DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected References for Browman Lecture: Ethical Issues Associated with Welfare

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selected References for Browman Lecture: Ethical Issues Associated with Welfare Selected references for Browman lecture: ethical issues associated with welfare Adamo, S.A. 2016. Do insects feel pain? A question at the intersection of animal behaviour, philosophy and robotics. Animal Behaviour 118: 75-79. Allen, C. 2013. Fish cognition and consciousness. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 26: 25-39. Anil, M.H. 2012. Religious slaughter: a current controversial animal welfare issue. Animal Frontiers 2: 64-67 doi:10.2527/af.2012-0051 Appel, M. & R.W: Elwood 2009. Gender differences, responsiveness and memory of a potentially painful event in hermit crabs. Animal Behaviour 78: 1373-1379. – “pain may be inferred” (contradicted by Puri & Faulkes) Arlinghaus, R. & A. Schwab. 2011. Five ethical challenges to recreational fishing: what they are and what they mean. American Fisheries Society Symposium 75: 219– 234. Arlinghaus, R. et al. 2007. Fish welfare: a challenge to the feelings-based approach, with implications for recreational fishing. Fish & Fisheries 8: 57-71. Arlinghaus, R. et al. 2009. Contrasting pragmatic and suffering-centred approaches to fish welfare in recreational angling. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2448-2463. Barron, A.B. & C. Klein 2016. What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 113: 4900-4908. Bekoff, M. (2007) The emotional lives of animals. New World Library Beleboni RO (ed) (2008) Unraveling animal welfare. ARBS-Ann Rev Biomed Sci 10:1-111 (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5016/1806-8774.2008.v10pTi) Bergqvist, J. & S. Gunnarsson. 2013. Finfish aquaculture: animal welfare, the environment, and ethical implications. Jour. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 26: 75-99. Born Free Foundation. 2012. The EU Zoo Inquiry 2011. Bovenkerk, B. & V.A. Braithwaite 2016. Beneath the surface: killing of fish as a moral problem. Franck L.B. Meijboom and Elsbeth N. Stassen (ed.) The end of animal life: a start for ethical debate. DOI 10.3920/978-90-8686-808-7_14, c Wageningen Academic Publishers. Braithwaite, V. 2010. Do fish feel pain? Oxford University Press. Broom, D.M. (2006) The evolution of morality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100: 20-28. Broom, D.M. 2010. Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 126: 1-11. Broom, D.M. 2014. Sentience and animal welfare. CABI Publishing, 200 p. Browman, H.I. & A.B. Skiftesvik (2007). Welfare of Aquatic Organisms. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 75(2) – entire issue (http://www.int- res.com/abstracts/dao/v75/n2/) Browman, H.I. & A.B. Skiftesvik (2011). Welfare of aquatic organisms is there some faith-based HARKing going on here? Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 94: 255-257. Brown, C. 2014. Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics. Animal Cognition 18: 1-17. Carbone, L. (2004) What animals want: expertise and advocacy in laboratory animal welfare policy. Oxford University Press. Chandroo, K.P., Duncan, I.J.H., Moccia, R.D. (2004) Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86:225-250. Chandroo, K.P., Yue, S., Moccia, R.D. (2004) An evaluation of current perspectives on consciousness and pain in fishes. Fish Fisheries 5: 281-295. Cooke, S.J. et al. 2016. Ten practical realities for institutional animal care and use committees when evaluating protocols dealing with fish in the field. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 26: 123-133. Cottee, S.Y. 2012. Are fish the victims of ‘speciesism’? A discussion about fear, pain and animal consciousness. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 38: 5-15. Cragg P, Keenan J, Sutherland G (eds) (2008) Blue sky to deep water: the reality and the promise. Proceedings Australian & New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching. Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. ISBN 1-877264-1. Cressey, D. 2014. Fish-kill method questioned. Nature 506: 419-420. Crook, R.J., R.T. Hanlon & E.T. Walters. 2013. Squid have nociceptors that display widespread long-term sensitization and spontaneous activity after bodily injury. Jour Neurosci. 33: 10021-10026. Dawkins, M.S. 2012. Why animals matter: Animal consciousness, animal welfare, and human well-being. Oxofrd University Press, 224 p. Dawkins, M.S. 2017. Animal welfare with and without consciousness. Journal of Zoology 301: 1-10. Diesch T.J. et al. 2007. Responsiveness to painful stimuli in anaesthetized newborn and young animals of varying neurological maturity (wallaby joeys, rat pups and lambs). AATEX 14: 549-552. Diggles BK, Cooke, SJ, Rose, JD, Sawynok W (2011) Ecology and welfare of aquatic animals in wild capture fisheries. Rev Fisher Fish Biol 21: 739-765. Duncan, I.J.H. (2006) The changing concept of animal sentience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100: 11-19. Elder, M.P. 2014. The fish pain debate: broadening humaity's moral horizon. Journal of Animal Ethics 4: 16-29. Elwood, R.W. & L. Adams 2015. Electric shock causes physiological stress responses in shore crabs, consistent with prediction of pain. Biology Letters 11: 20150800. European Union 2013. Welfare of companion animals in Europe: views and perspectives. Evans, J.C. 2009. The ethics of fish welfare. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2872-2874. Feinberg, T.E. & J. Mallatt. 2016. The nature of primary consciousness. A new synthesis. Consciousness and Cognition 43: 113-127. Fiorito et al. 2014. Cephalopods in neuroscience: regulations, research and the 3Rs. Invert. Neurosci. 14: 13-36. Gould SJ (1978) Sociobiology – art of storytelling. New Scient 80:530-533 Gould SJ (1993) Cordelia’s Dilemma. Nat Hist 2/93:10-18 Grandin, T. 2014. Animal welfare and society concerns: finding the missing link. Meat Science 98: 461-469. Habermas J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, Boston, 465 pp Hilborn R (2006) Faith-based fisheries. Fisher 31:554-555 Horvath, K., D. Angeletti, G. Nascetti & C. Carere. 2013. Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue. Ann Ist Super Sanità 2013 | Vol. 49, No. 1: 9-17. DOI: 10.4415/ANN_13_01_04 Huntingford, F.A. & S. Kadri. 2009. Taking account of fish welfare: lessons from aquaculture. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2862-2867. Huntingford, F.A., Adams, C., Braithwaite, V.A., Kadri, S., Pottinger, T.G., Dandoe, P, Turnbull, J.F. (2006) Current issues in fish welfare. Journal of Fish Biology 68: 332- 372. International Whaling Commisssion. 2010. Report of the workshop on welfare issues associated with the entanglement of large whales. IWC/62/15, Agenda item 5.2.1 http://iwcoffice.org/_documents/commission/IWC62docs/62-15.pdf Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medic 2, e124 Jones, R.C. 2013. Science, sentience, and animal welfare. Biol. Philos. 28: 1-30. Kerr NL (1998) HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 2:196-217. Key, B. 2014. Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding phenomenal consciousness. Biol. Philosophy DOI 10.1007/s10539-014-9469-4 Key, B. 2016. Why fish do not feel pain. Animal Sentience 2016.003 and comments on the article - http://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss3/1/ Kittilsen, S. 2013. Functional aspects of emotions in fish. Behav. Processes 100: 153- 159. Knutsson, S. 2016. Reducing suffering among invertebrates such as insects. Sentience Politics 1: 1-18. Kupsala, S., P. Jokinen & M. Vinnari. 2013. Who cares about farmed fish? Citizen perceptions of the welfare and the mental abilities of fish. Jour. Agric. Environ. Ethics 26: 119-135. Manciocco, A., P. Coluccio & A. Passantino. 2010. Considerations on psychophysical welfare of fish employed in scientific procedures and on Recommendation 2007/526/EC. Ann Ist Super Sanità 2010 | Vol. 46, No. 2: 198-203. DOI: 10.4415/ANN_10_02_14 Mellor, D.J. et al. 2005. The importance of ’awareness’ for understanding fetal pain. Brain Research Reviews. 49: 455-471. Metcalfe, J.D. 2009. Welfare in wild-capture marine fisheries. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2855-2861. Moore, M.J. 2014. How we all kill whales. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71: 760-763. Ohl, F. & F.J. van der Staay. 2012. Animal welfare: At the interface between science and society. The Veterinary Journal 192: 13-19. Polese, G. 2014. Dose-dependent effects of the clinical anesthetic isoflurane on Octopus vulgaris: a contribution to cephalopod welfare. Jour. Aquat. Aniam. Health. 26: 285-294. Proctor, H.S., G. Carder & A.R. Cornish. 2013. Searching for animal sentience: a systematic review of the scientific literature. Animals. 3: 882-906. Puri, S., Z. Faulkes. 2010. Do decapod crustaceans have nociceptors for extreme pH? PLOS ONE 5(4): e10244 Readman GD, Owen SF, Murrell JC, Knowles TG (2013) Do Fish Perceive Anaesthetics as Aversive? PLoS ONE 8(9): e73773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073773 Rose. J.D. 2002. The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10: 1-38.Rose, J.D. 2008. Interview with a fish. World Aquaculture 39(4). Rose, J.D. & C.J. Woodbury. 2008. Animal models of nociception and pain. Pp: 333-340, In: Pm: Conn (Ed.). Sourcebook of models for biomedical research. Totowa: Humana Press. Rose, J.D., R. Arlinghaus, S.J. Cooke, B.K. Diggles, W. Sawynok, E.D. Stevens & C.D.L. Wynne. 2014. Can fish really feel pain? Fish and Fisheries 15: 97-133. Sandøe, P. et al. 2009. Balancing the needs and preferences of humans against concerns for fishes: how to handle the emerging ethical discussions regarding capture fisheries? Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2868-2871. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from European Commission on General approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. The EFSA Journal (2009) 954: 1-26 Sherwin, C.M. (2001) Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy? Animal Welfare 10: S103-S118 (Supplement).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles The Republic of Uzbekistan Part I Overview and main indicators 1. Country brief 2. FAO Fisheries statistics Part II Narrative (2008) 3. Production sector Inland sub-sector Aquaculture sub-sector Recreational sub-sector 4. Post-harvest sector Fish utilization Source of information United Nations Geospatial Information Section http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm Fish markets Imagery for continents and oceans reproduced from GEBCO, www.gebco.net 5. Socio-economic contribution of the fishery sector Role of fisheries in the national economy Supply and demand Trade Food security Employment Rural development 6. Trends, issues and development Constraints and opportunities Government and non-government sector policies and development strategies Research, education and training Foreign aid 7. Institutional framework 8. Legal framework Additional information 9. FAO Thematic data bases 10. Publications 11. Meetings & News archive FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Part I Overview and main indicators Part I of the Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profile is compiled using the most up-to-date information available from the FAO Country briefs and Statistics programmes at the time of publication. The Country Brief and the FAO Fisheries Statistics provided in Part I may, however, have been prepared at different times, which would explain any inconsistencies. Country brief Prepared: March 2018 Uzbekistan covers an area of 447400km2. It is a landlocked country and mountains dominate the landscape in the east and northeast. The fisheries in Uzbekistan comprise two main components, namely inland capture fisheries and aquaculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Animal Welfare in U.S Fish Culture
    AQUATIC ANIMAL WELFARE IN U.S FISH CULTURE F. S. Conte Department of Animal Science University of California Davis 60th Annual Northwest Fish Culture Conference Redding, CA December 1-3, 2009 Animal Rights People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) http://www.animalactivist.com/ Animal Rights & Animal Welfare Animal Rights: A philosophy that animals have the same rights as people. Objective: to end the use of animals as companions and pets, and in extreme cases, opposition to the use of animals for food, fiber, entertainment and medical research. Animal Welfare: Concern for the well-being of individual animals, unrelated to the perceived rights of the animal or the ecological dynamics of the species. The position usually focuses on the morality of human action (or inaction), as opposed to making deeper political or philosophical claims about the status of animals Fish Welfare: A challenge to the feeling-based approach, with implications to recreational fisheries Table 1 Implications of animal welfare, animal liberation and animal rights concepts for the socially accepted interaction of humans with fish. Animal welfare Animal Animal Criteria liberation rights Fish have intrinsic value Yes/No No Yes Fish have rights No No Yes Duties towards fish Yes Yes Yes Catch, kill and eat Yes No No Regulatory catch-and-release Yes No No Voluntary catch-and-release Yes No No Recreational fishing Yes No No Fishery management Yes No No Use of animals (food, work, Yes No No manufacture, recreation and science) Robert Arlinghaus, Steven J. Cooke, Alexander Schwab & Ian G. Cowx. Fish and Fisheries, 2007, 8, 57-71.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 20062006 NationalNational SurveySurvey ofof Fishing,Fishing, Hunting,Hunting, andand Wildlife-AssociatedWildlife-Associated RecreationRecreation FHW/06-NAT 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Dirk Kempthorne, Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Secretary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Economics and Statistics Administration H. Dale Hall, Cynthia A. Glassman, Director Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Charles Louis Kincannon, Director U.S. Department of the Interior Economics and Statistics Dirk Kempthorne, Administration Secretary Cynthia A. Glassman, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service H. Dale Hall, Director U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Charles Louis Kincannon, Director Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Rowan Gould, Assistant Director The U.S. Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientifi c and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsi- bilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affi liated Island Communities. The mission of the Department’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fi sh, wildlife, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service is responsible for national programs of vital importance to our natural resources, including administration of the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs. These two programs provide fi nan- cial assistance to the States for projects to enhance and protect fi sh and wildlife resources and to assure their availability to the public for recreational purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • EIFAAC International Symposium Recreational Fishing in an Era of Change Lillehammer, Norway 14 – 17 June 2015
    REPORT M-369 | 2015 EIFAAC International Symposium Recreational fishing in an era of change Lillehammer, Norway 14 – 17 June 2015 COLOPHON Executive institution Norwegian Environment Agency Project manager for the contractor Contact person in the Norwegian Environment Agency Øystein Aas Arne Eggereide M-no Year Pages Contract number 369 2015 70 Publisher The project is funded by Norwegian Environment Agency, NINA, NASCO, Norwegian Environment Agency EIFAAC Registration Fees Author(s) Øystein Aas (editor) Title – Norwegian and English EIFAAC International Symposium - Recreational fishing in an era of change. Symposium Program and Abstracts. Summary – sammendrag Norway host an international symposium on recreational fisheries initiated and organised through the European Inland Fisheries and Aquaculture Advisory Commission (EIFAAC), in Lillehammer, 14 – 17 June 2015. Nearly 200 participants from around 20 countries have registered for the meeting. This report presents the full program of the Symposium, including abstracts for the more than 100 presentations given at the meeting. 4 emneord 4 subject words Konferanse, fritidsfiske, EIFAAC, program Conference, programme, EIFAAC, angling Front page photo Øystein Aas 2 EIFAAC International Symposium | M-369 | 2015 Content 1. Preface ....................................................................................................... 4 2. Symposium organisation ................................................................................... 5 3. Supporters and sponsors ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Recreational Fishing Participation Among Alaska Residents
    Special Publication No. 06-20 Factors Affecting Recreational Fishing Participation among Alaska Residents by William J. Romberg July 2006 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright © common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co. correlation coefficient nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Participation in Recreational Fishing
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 12-2013 Spatial and Temporal Participation in Recreational Fishing Dustin R. Martin University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Martin, Dustin R., "Spatial and Temporal Participation in Recreational Fishing" (2013). Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources. 79. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss/79 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PARTICIPATION IN RECREATIONAL FISHING by Dustin R. Martin A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Natural Resource Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Kevin L. Pope Lincoln, Nebraska December, 2013 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PARTICIPATION IN RECREATIONAL FISHING Dustin Robert Martin, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2013 Advisor: Kevin L. Pope Buffering inland fisheries against large-scale changes in ecosystem function, climate regimes, and societal valuations of natural resources requires progressive management approaches that incorporate fish and angler dynamics at large spatial and temporal scales. Current paradigms of inland fishery management generally utilize waterbody-specific, fish-centric frameworks designed to regulate fish populations directly, and anglers indirectly, through fish stock enhancement and harvest regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildli
    To: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge 5396 VT Route 105 Brunswick, VT 05905 Re: Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Recreational Hunting and Fishing Plan for New Hampshire and Vermont Position: Support Date: July 6, 2021 To Whom It May Concern: My name is Joseph Mullin, and I am the Assistant Manager, Northeastern States for the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF). As an avid sportsman, and a non-resident license holder who enjoys participating in the many outdoor opportunities that New Hampshire and Vermont have to offer, I submit this letter to express our general support while providing additional recommendations on the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Recreational Hunting and Fishing Plan for New Hampshire and Vermont (Hunting and Fishing Plan). It is my earnest hope that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service takes these recommendations into account when producing a final plan for this National Fish and Wildlife Refuge. Since 1989, CSF has dedicated itself to the mission of working with Congress, governors, and state legislatures to protect and advance hunting, angling, recreational shooting and trapping. The unique and collective force of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus, the Governors Sportsmen's Caucus, and the National Assembly of Sportsmen's Caucuses, working closely with CSF, and with the support of major hunting, recreational fishing and shooting, and trapping organizations, serves as an unprecedented network of pro-sportsmen elected officials that advance the conservation interests of America's hunters and anglers. It is from this voice – with more than three decades of organizational history and a staff with more than a century of combined policy experience on sportsmen’s issues – that we strongly support the proposed Hunting and Fishing Plan and offer additional recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Welfare in Recreational Fishing
    Chapter 19 Fish Welfare in Recreational Fishing Keno Ferter, Steven J. Cooke, Odd-Børre Humborstad, Jonatan Nilsson, and Robert Arlinghaus Abstract Recreational fishing is a popular activity around the globe, and fish welfare issues related to the activity have received increasing attention in some countries, particularly in central and northern Europe and Australia. This chapter offers an introduction to recreational fishing, reviews literature on fish welfare in relation to recreational fishing and provides an overview of potential biological impacts and ways to reduce such impacts. We first focus on the question on how to reduce impacts on the welfare of the fish during recreational fishing. Second, we describe two case studies highlighting that practical implications of the fish welfare discourse may be disjointed from the scientific information base and be rather about fundamental moral questions about the ethical acceptability of the activity per se. We end by providing an outlook on the future of recreational fishing in the light of the current fish welfare discourse. Keywords Best practice guidelines · Catch-and-release · Fish welfare · Function- based approach · Recreational fishing · Sublethal impacts Recreational fishing is a popular activity around the globe (Arlinghaus et al. 2015, 2019). Apart from the recognized biological and socio-economic importance of recreational fishing, fish welfare issues related to the activity have received increas- ing attention in some countries and in the academic literature (Huntingford et al. 2006; Arlinghaus et al. 2007a, b, 2012b; Cooke and Sneddon 2007; Volpato 2009; Arlinghaus and Schwab 2011). This chapter offers an introduction to recreational K. Ferter (*) · O.-B. Humborstad · J.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPORTANCE of MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING in SHANGHAI1 What Is Marine Recreational Fishing?
    IIFET 2014 Australia Conference Proceedings THE IMPORTANCE OF MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING IN SHANGHAI1 CHEN Ye2 (College of Economies & Management, Shanghai Ocean University) Abstract Recreational fishing, also called sport fishing, is fishing for pleasure or competition. Recreational fishing can advance fisheries technology and benefits related industries. Recreational fishing can also diversify and increase the income of fishermen. Recreational fishing promotes mutual understanding between urban dwellers and fishermen, which is important to “Harmonious Society”. Last but not least, recreational fishing can raise ordinary people’s awareness of the importance of environment protection and territorial waters, which is especially important after China outlined the "maritime power strategy” in 2012. Shanghai, the most modern city in China, is just beside East China Sea (Shanghai means “Upon-the-Sea” in Chinese language). Shanghai is also the birthplace of China’s tourism industry. Shanghainese spent a lot of money on tourism annually. Recreational fishing has the potential to be a big and profitable industry in Shanghai. As people’s income increases, the value of recreational fishing in Shanghai will became more obvious. To order to promote the development of marine recreational fishing, the municipal governance of Shanghai should cooperate with neighboring provinces, set up laws and regulation and promote the development of related industries. Key Words： marine recreational fishing Shanghai What is Marine Recreational Fishing? Recreational fishing, also called sport fisheries, is fishing for pleasure or competition. It can be contrasted with commercial fishing, which is fishing for profit, or subsistence fishing, which is fishing for survival. The most common form of recreational fishing is done with a rod, reel, line, hooks and any one of a wide range of baits.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Pond Management for Recreational Fishing
    MP360 Farm Pond Management for Recreational Fishing Fis ure / herie ult s C ac en u te q r A Cooperative Extension Program, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and U f County Governments in cooperation with the Arkansas n f i u v l e B Game and Fish Commission r e si n ty Pi of at Arkansas Farm Pond Management for Recreational Fishing Authors University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Aquaculture and Fisheries Center Scott Jones Nathan Stone Anita M. Kelly George L. Selden Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Brett A. Timmons Jake K. Whisenhunt Mark Oliver Editing and Design Laura Goforth Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 The Pond Ecosystem .................................................................................................1 Pond Design and Construction Planning............................................................................................................................................2 Site Selection and Pond Design.......................................................................................................2 Construction…………………………………………………………………………… .............................3 Ponds for Watering Livestock..........................................................................................................3 Dam Maintenance ............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Ocean Fish Farming
    Industrial Ocean Fish Farming quaculture is one of the fastest growing food production sectors. More A than half of seafood consumed globally is now farmed, and aquaculture recently surpassed global beef production.1 Unfortunately, one of the most prevalent forms of marine aquaculture is fraught with environmental and social havoc. What is Industrial Ocean Fish Farming? Industrial Ocean Fish Farming – sometimes referred to as open ocean or offshore aquaculture – is the mass breeding, rearing, and harvesting of seafood in areas of the ocean that are beyond coastal influence. Mainstream, industrial offshore aquaculture practices are essentially underwater factory farms with devastating environmental and socio-economic impacts. The most popular (and most risky) method of industrial ocean fish farming occurs in underwater net pens, pods, and Photo by NOAA National Ocean Service cages. The raising of finfish, such as salmon and yellowtail, in these difficult-to-manage atmospheres is most problematic because the nets and cages allow for free and unregulated exchange between the farmed fish and the surrounding ocean environment. As detailed below, this open exchange allows for fish escapes and spills, heightened threats to native wildlife, and the introduction of non-native pests and diseases, among numerous other harms. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration currently considers industrial ocean fish farming as a fishing activity under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. Simply because fish are removed from the industrial farm’s nets at time of harvest does not mean the activity is the same as fishing. Indeed, these activities are farming – just as a chicken or pig is raised for human consumption on a land-based farm – and should be regulated as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Productivity Commission Public Inquiry Into the Regulation of Marine Fisheries and Aquaculture
    Vegan Australia Level 3, 50 York Street, Sydney 2000 Email: [email protected] Phone: 0400 492 157 Web: veganaustralia.org.au 31 March 2016 Submission to the Productivity Commission public inquiry into the regulation of Marine Fisheries and Aquaculture Vegan Australia is pleased to have the opportunity to provide a submission to the Productivity Commission public inquiry into the regulation of the Australian Marine Fisheries and Aquaculture Sectors. Vegan Australia is a national organisation that educates the public about animal rights and veganism and also presents a strong voice for veganism to government, institutions, corporations and the media. Vegan Australia envisions a world where all animals live free from human use and ownership. The foundation of Vegan Australia is justice and compassion, for animals as well as for people and the planet. The first step each of us should take to put this compassion into action is to become vegan and to encourage others to do the same. Vegan Australia represents a growing section of the Australian community who believe that animals, including marine animals, should not be subjected to exploitation or cruelty, for any purpose, including food, clothing, and entertainment. As such, at a fundamental level, we believe that Australian fisheries and aquaculture operations should cease, and that Australians should cease to eat or use all animals, including fish and other sea animals, and their products. Instead we should be encouraging Australians to eat a plant-based diet, which has proven health benefits, and to cease using fish for other purposes. Vegan Australia believes that this inquiry into fisheries and aquaculture is an opportunity to reflect on our use of animals in these industry.
    [Show full text]