DOCSLIB.ORG

Camp Blanding Multiple At-Risk Species: Candidate Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for Multiple At-Risk Species in North Florida Camp Blanding Joint Training Center Clay County, FL © Kevin Enge © Peter Canavan © FWC © Andy Wraithmell Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Armory Board, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission in cooperation with the Army National Guard March 28, 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the Southeast Region of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, there are 470 Federal candidate species and other at-risk species ranging from narrow endemics to wide-ranging mammals and birds. Given the number and diversity of these species, it is clear that a monumental effort is needed for their conservation. Approaching such a task with a single-species mindset would be both ineffective and inefficient. The need to develop Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances that cover large geographic areas and address the needs of multiple species was emphasized in the Southeast Region’s Ecological Services Work Plan for fiscal year 2013 and beyond (Service 2013). To further the Work Plan’s “Desired Future Condition of At-Risk Species Conservation,” this Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances is designed to deliver conservation at the habitat scale. The premise of this strategy is that most candidate and at-risk species face threats associated with loss and/or degradation of habitat (a description of the substantive habitats addressed in this CCAA is discussed in the Description of the Enrolled Lands section below). Through this Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances, the State of Florida Armory Board will implement conservation actions on portions of the Camp Blanding Joint Training Center to effectively protect, restore, and manage the candidate and at-risk species’ (Covered Species) habitat so as to eliminate or reduce threats to a level that precludes or removes the need to list a species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.). Three conservation objectives and multiple conservation actions are presented in this Agreement to accomplish this goal. Where threats other than habitat loss and degradation are known, this Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances addresses specific actions to reduce or eliminate them. This Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances is unique in that the Covered Species are Federal candidates and/or species that are listed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Commission) as State-threatened species or species of special concern. Through this Agreement and the associated Enhancement of Survival Permit, the Armory Board will receive regulatory assurances from the Service in the event a Covered Species is Federally-listed in the future as well as from the Commission for the Covered Species that are State-listed as of the effective date of this Agreement. ii Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for Multiple At-Risk Species in North Florida Camp Blanding Joint Training Center Clay County, FL Agreement Number 1448-XXX-XXX Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE .......................................................................................... 4 3.0 THREATS TO THE COVERED SPECIES ........................................................................ 7 4.0 EXPECTED BENEFITS AND CONSERVATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........... 8 4.1 Expected Benefits ............................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Conservation Goals and Objectives ................................................................................. 8 5.0 EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS ON AND DESCRIPTION OF THE ENROLLED LANDS ........................................................................................................................................... 9 5.1 Flatwoods ....................................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Sandhill........................................................................................................................... 11 5.3 Scrub............................................................................................................................... 12 5.4 Ephemeral Wetlands ...................................................................................................... 12 5.5 Forested Wetlands .......................................................................................................... 12 5.6 Surface Waters ............................................................................................................... 13 6.0 CONSERVATION ACTIONS .......................................................................................... 13 6.1 Flatwoods ....................................................................................................................... 13 6.2 Sandhill........................................................................................................................... 15 6.3 Scrub............................................................................................................................... 17 6.4 Ephemeral Wetlands ...................................................................................................... 19 6.5 Forested Wetlands .......................................................................................................... 20 6.6 Surface Waters ............................................................................................................... 21 iii 7.0 MONITORING, REPORTING AND INDICATORS OF SUCCESS .............................. 22 7.1 Flatwoods ....................................................................................................................... 22 7.2 Sandhill........................................................................................................................... 23 7.3 Scrub............................................................................................................................... 23 7.4 Ephemeral Wetlands, Forested Wetlands and Surface Waters ..................................... 24 8.0 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES ........................................................................ 25 8.1 State of Florida Armory Board....................................................................................... 25 8.2 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission .................................................... 25 8.3 Army National Guard ..................................................................................................... 26 8.4 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...................................................................................... 26 9.0 FUNDING FOR THE AGREEMENT .............................................................................. 27 10.0 REGULATORY ASSURANCES TO THE LANDOWNER............................................ 27 The Service’s Assurances to the Armory Board ....................................................................... 27 The FWC’s Assurances to the Armory Board .......................................................................... 28 11.0 INCIDENTAL TAKE AUTHORIZATION ...................................................................... 28 NOTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 29 12.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 30 13.0 EMERGENCY SITUATIONS .......................................................................................... 31 14.0 Modifications .............................................................................................................. 31 15.0 TERMINATION ........................................................................................................ 31 16.0 ADDITIONAL CONESRVATION ACTIONS ......................................................... 32 17.0 SUCCESSION AND TRANSFER ............................................................................. 32 18.0 PERMIT REVOCATION .................................................................................................. 33 19.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS .................................................................................. 33 20.0 NOTIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................. 34 21.0 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) COMPLIANCE .................. 36 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................. 37 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – List of Habitat Types by Acreage Comprising the Enrolled Lands on Camp Blanding Joint Training Center…………………………………………………………………… 4 Table 2 – List of Covered Species and their associated Habitats on Camp Blanding
Recommended publications
  • New Alien Crayfish Species in Central Europe

    New Alien Crayfish Species in Central Europe

    NEW ALIEN CRAYFISH SPECIES IN CENTRAL EUROPE Introduction pathways, life histories, and ecological impacts DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften der Universität Ulm vorgelegt von Christoph Chucholl aus Rosenheim Ulm 2012 NEW ALIEN CRAYFISH SPECIES IN CENTRAL EUROPE Introduction pathways, life histories, and ecological impacts DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften der Universität Ulm vorgelegt von Christoph Chucholl aus Rosenheim Ulm 2012 Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Axel Groß Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Manfred Ayasse Zweitgutachter: Prof. apl. Dr. Gerhard Maier Tag der Prüfung: 16.7.2012 Cover picture: Orconectes immunis male (blue color morph) (photo courtesy of Dr. H. Bellmann) Table of contents Part 1 – Summary Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Invasive alien species – a global menace ....................................................................... 1 “Invasive” matters .......................................................................................................... 2 Crustaceans – successful invaders .................................................................................. 4 The case of alien crayfish in Europe .............................................................................. 5 New versus Old alien crayfish .......................................................................................
  • Japanese American Internment: a Tragedy of War Amber Martinez Kennesaw State University

    Japanese American Internment: a Tragedy of War Amber Martinez Kennesaw State University

    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects 4-21-2014 Japanese American Internment: A Tragedy of War Amber Martinez Kennesaw State University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Martinez, Amber, "Japanese American Internment: A Tragedy of War" (2014). Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 604. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT: A TRAGEDY OF WAR A Reflexive Essay Presented To The Academic Faculty Amber Martinez In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in American Studies Kennesaw State University (May, 2014) 1 Japanese American internment in the United States during World War II affected thousands of lives for generations yet it remains hidden in historical memory. There have been surges of public interest since the release of the internees, such as during the Civil Rights movement and the campaign for redress, which led to renewed interest in scholarship investigating the internment. Once redress was achieved in 1988, public interest waned again as did published analysis of the internment. After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan began, American pride and displays of homeland loyalty created a unique event in American history.
  • ANOTHER NEW EUPHYES from the SOUTHERN UNITED STATES COASTAL PLAIN (HESPERIIDAE) the Southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains Ar

    ANOTHER NEW EUPHYES from the SOUTHERN UNITED STATES COASTAL PLAIN (HESPERIIDAE) the Southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains Ar

    Journal of the Lepidopteri'ts' Society .50(1 ), 1996, 46- 53 ANOTHER NEW EUPHYES FROM THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES COASTAL PLAIN (HESPERIIDAE) JOHN A. SHUEY The Nature ConselVancy, Indiana Field Office, 1330 West 38th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46208, USA ABSTRACT. The taxon Euphyes dukesi calhouni Shuey, new subspecies endemic to FIOlida, is described. This subspecies is amply differentiated from Euphyes dukesi dukesi and the two taxa are allopatric. In northeaste rn F lorida and sout eastern G eorgia, whe re their known ranges closely approach one another, there is almost no evidence of inte r­ gradation. Euphyes dukesi calhouni is limited to swamp habitats that support large stands of the sedge hostplants, various Rhynchospora and Carex specie:; (Cype raceae). Additional key words: biogeography, we tlands, conservation. The southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains are rich regions for wetland butterflies, especially for genera such as Euphyes, Poanes, and Problema. For example , as currently known, eight named Euphyes spe­ cies or subspecies occur in the wetlands of these coastal plains. Four of these taxa are restricted to the coastal plain: Euphyes palatka palatka (Edwards), Euphyes palatka klotsi Mille r, Harvey and Miller, Euphyes berryi (Bell), and Euphyes bayensis Shuey. Just as interesting as their limited coastal distributions is the presence in these wetland skippers of well differentiated p eripheral populations, many of which have only recently bee n recognized and described. These peripheral populations are most probably the end result of allopatric diffe rentiation. For example, Euphyes palatka klotsi repre sents its spe­ cies on a few of the lower Florida Keys, separated from the nominate mainland subspecies by just tens of miles.
  • Kip Tokuda Civil Liberties Program

    Kip Tokuda Civil Liberties Program

    Kip Tokuda Civil Liberties Program 1. Purpose: The Kip Tokuda competitive grant program supports the intent of RCW 28A.300.405 to do one or both of the following: 1) educate the public regarding the history and lessons of the World War II exclusion, removal, and detention of persons of Japanese ancestry through the development, coordination, and distribution of new educational materials and the development of curriculum materials to complement and augment resources currently available on this subject matter; and 2) develop videos, plays, presentations, speaker bureaus, and exhibitions for presentation to elementary schools, secondary schools, community colleges, and other interested parties. 2. Description of services provided: Grants were provided to the following individuals and organizations: Bainbridge Island Japanese American Community (BIJAC): BIJAC offered workshops featuring four oral history documentary films of the Japanese American WWII experience and accompanying curricula aligning with OSPI-developed Assessments for use in distance-learning lessons during the COVID- 19 pandemic, and developed online interactive activities to use with the oral history films in online workshops. Erin Shigaki: In the first phase of the grant Erin used the funds to revise the design of three wall murals about the Japanese American exclusion and detention located in what was the historic Japantown or Nihonmachi in Seattle, WA. The first and second locations are in Seattle’s Chinatown-International District in “Nihonmachi Alley” and the third location is the side of the Densho building located on Jackson Street. Erin spent time working with a fabricator regarding material options and installation. Densho (JALP): From January to June, the content staff completed articles on a range of confinement sites administered by the War Relocation Authority (WRA), the Wartime Civil Control Administration (WCCA), the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), and the U.S.
  • Mike Roess Gold Head Branch State Park

    Mike Roess Gold Head Branch State Park

    Mike Roess Gold Head Branch State Park Unit Management Plan APPROVED STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks April 16, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN.....................................................................4 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW...............................................................5 Management Authority and Responsibility.............................................................5 Park Management Goals .............................................................................................6 Management Coordination.........................................................................................7 Public Participation......................................................................................................7 Other Designations......................................................................................................7 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................9 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT................................................11 Natural Resources......................................................................................................11 Topography............................................................................................................11
  • Wet-Mesic Flatwoods Communitywet-Mesic Flatwoods, Abstract Page 1

    Wet-Mesic Flatwoods Communitywet-Mesic Flatwoods, Abstract Page 1

    Wet-mesic Flatwoods CommunityWet-mesic Flatwoods, Abstract Page 1 Historical Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Suzan L. Campbell Overview: Wet-mesic flatwoods is a somewhat Rank Justification: The acreage of wet-mesic poorly drained to poorly drained forest on mineral flatwoods present in Michigan circa 1800 is difficult soils dominated by a mixture of lowland and upland to determine because the community type has hardwoods. The community occurs exclusively on characteristics that overlap those of several of the glacial lakeplain in southeastern Lower Michigan, forest types mapped based on General Land Office where an impermeable clay layer in the soil profile (GLO) survey notes, primarily hardwood swamp and contributes to poor internal drainage. Seasonal beech-sugar maple forest (Comer et al. 1995a, Kost hydrologic fluctuations and windthrow are important et al. 2007). Analysis of GLO survey notes reveals natural disturbances that influence community structure, that lowland forest dominated by hardwoods covered species composition, and successional trajectory of wet- approximately 570,000 ha (1,400,000 ac) of southern mesic flatwoods. Lower Michigan circa 1800 (Comer et al. 1995a). These stands were characterized by mixed hardwoods Global and State Rank: G2G3/S2 (490,000 ha or 1,200,000 ac), black ash (77,000 ha or 190,000 ac), elm (5,300 ha or 13,000 ac), and silver Range: Flatwoods communities characterized by maple-red maple (4,000 ha or 10,000 ac). The majority relatively flat topography, slowly permeable to of lowland forest acreage in southern Lower Michigan impermeable subsurface soil layers, and seasonal was associated with stream and river floodplains, hydrologic fluctuation occur scattered throughout the and is classified as floodplain forest (Tepley et al.
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R

    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R

    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
  • Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment

    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment

    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus pictus) Species Status Assessment Version 1.0 Photo by Christopher Anderson July 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic, Gulf & Mississippi Basin Regions Atlanta, GA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by Kathryn N. Smith-Hicks (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Heath Rauschenberger (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Service]), Lourdes Mena (Service), David Cook (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]), and Erin Rivenbark (Service). Other species expertise, guidance, and document reviews were provided by Paul Moler (FWC), Gary Warren (FWC), Lindsey Reisinger (University of Florida), Katherine Lawlor (FWC), Kristi Lee (FWC), and Kasey Fralick (FWC). Additionally, peer reviewers including Troy Keller and Chester R. Figiel, Jr. provided valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for Procambarus pictus (Black Creek crayfish), Version 1.0. July 2020. Atlanta, Georgia. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Black Creek crayfish (Procambarus pictus) are small to medium sized crayfish endemic to four northeastern Florida counties (Clay, Duval, Putnam, and St. Johns) in the Lower St. Johns River Basin. Black Creek crayfish rely on cool, flowing, sand-bottomed, and tannic-stained streams that are highly oxygenated. Locations that fulfill the species’ habitat requirements are typically headwater sections of streams that maintain a constant flow; however, they are found in small and large tributary streams. Within these streams, Black Creek crayfish require aquatic vegetation and debris for shelter with alternation of shaded and open canopy cover where they eat aquatic plants, dead plant and animal material, and detritus.
  • Argia the News Journal of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas

    Argia the News Journal of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas

    ISSN 1061-8503 TheA News Journalrgia of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas Volume 22 17 December 2010 Number 4 Published by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas http://www.DragonflySocietyAmericas.org/ ARGIA Vol. 22, No. 4, 17 December 2010 In This Issue .................................................................................................................................................................1 Calendar of Events ......................................................................................................................................................1 Minutes of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas, by Steve Valley ............................2 2010 Treasurer’s Report, by Jerrell J. Daigle ................................................................................................................2 Enallagma novaehispaniae Calvert (Neotropical Bluet), Another New Species for Arizona, by Rich Bailowitz ......3 Photos Needed ............................................................................................................................................................3 Lestes australis (Southern Spreadwing), New for Arizona, by Rich Bailowitz ...........................................................4 Ischnura barberi (Desert Forktail) Found in Oregon, by Jim Johnson ........................................................................4 Recent Discoveries in Montana, by Nathan S. Kohler ...............................................................................................5
  • 2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory

    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory

    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory ........................................................................................... 3 Alaska ... ........................................ ............................................................... 3 LEPIDOPTERISTS Zone 2: British Columbia .................................................... ........................ ............ 6 Idaho .. ... ....................................... ................................................................ 6 Oregon ........ ... .... ........................ .. .. ............................................................ 10 SOCIETY Volume 53 Supplement Sl Washington ................................................................................................ 14 Zone 3: Arizona ............................................................ .................................... ...... 19 The Lepidopterists' Society is a non-profo California ............... ................................................. .............. .. ................... 2 2 educational and scientific organization. The Nevada ..................................................................... ................................ 28 object of the Society, which was formed in Zone 4: Colorado ................................ ... ............... ... ...... ......................................... 2 9 May 1947 and formally constituted in De­ Montana .................................................................................................... 51 cember
  • Over 55 Years Ago, the United States Entered World War II. to Most Americans, Now, It’S Something That Happened “Over There” and Is Far Removed from Home

    Over 55 Years Ago, the United States Entered World War II. to Most Americans, Now, It’S Something That Happened “Over There” and Is Far Removed from Home

    by Mike Prero Over 55 years ago, the United States entered World War II. To most Americans, now, it’s something that happened “over there” and is far removed from home. We frequently read books and see movies about our soldiers in Japanese or German prisoner-of-war camps, but few members of the younger generation realize that between 1942 and 1946, the United States held almost 400,000 German, more than 50,000 Italian, and 5,000 Japanese soldiers in P.O.W. camps right here in the United States. I’ve been a Military collector ever since I entered the hobby, but my interest was really drawn to P.O.W. camps during a game of bridge a number of years ago. Our opponents, an elderly couple, had actually met and fallen in love in a Japanese P.O.W. camp in the Philippines. Fascinating! And so are P.O.W. camp covers. There were over 500 such P.O.W. camps in America during the war. One of them was right down the road from here, in Stockton, CA. Not surprisingly, most were located in the western and central states that had wide-open spaces: California, Texas, Idaho, Arizona, Nebraska, Kansas, Wyoming, etc. Although, there were a few in places like Maryland, Wisconsin, and Michigan. As with most World War II U.S. installations, there are a variety of covers from these P.O.W. camps, although they are definitely scarce compared to the number of camps that existed. I currently have 6,842 U.S. Military covers, but Major P.O.W.
  • Species of Greatest Conservation Need

    Species of Greatest Conservation Need

    APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Barking Hyla gratiosa II a Forest Forests near or within The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information System indicates treefrog shallow wetlands the loss suitable wetlands constitute the greatest threats to this species. DGIF recommends working to maintain or restore forested buffers surrounding occupied wetlands. These needs are consistent with action plan priorities to conserve and restore wetland habitats and associated buffers. Recently discovered populations within its known range, may indicate this species is more abundant than previously believed. An in-depth investigation into its status may warrant delisting. This species will be prioritized as Tier 2a. Amphibians Blue Ridge Desmognathus IV c Forest High elevation seeps, This species' distribution is very limited. Other than limiting dusky orestes streams, wet rock faces, logging activity in the occupied areas, no conservation salamander and riparian forests actions have been identified. Unless other threats or actions are identified, this species will be listed as Tier 4c. Amphibians Blue Ridge Eurycea III a Wetland Mountain streams and The needs of this species are consistent with priorities for two-lined wilderae adjacent riparian areas maintaining and enhancing riparian forests and aquatic salamander with mixed hardwood or habitats. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. spruce-fir forests up to 6000 feet. Amphibians Carpenter Lithobates III a Wetland Freshwater wetlands with The needs of this species are consistent with action plan frog virgatipes sphagnum moss priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland habitats and water quality.