DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Media Giants Increasingly Censor and Ban Conservative Voices and Organizations Online in April 2018, the MRC Released Let’S Look at Some Recent Examples

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Media Giants Increasingly Censor and Ban Conservative Voices and Organizations Online in April 2018, the MRC Released Let’S Look at Some Recent Examples TM Creating a Media Culture in America Where Truth and Liberty Flourish Vol. 26 • Issue 8 • August 2019 Social Media Giants Increasingly Censor and Ban Conservative Voices and Organizations Online In April 2018, the MRC released Let’s look at some recent examples. an extensive report, Censored! Ken Webster is a libertarian/ which documented how online media conservative who hosts a talk-radio MRC Headquarters • Reston, VA companies, such as Facebook, Google, show on KPRC in Houston and promotes Twitter, and YouTube, were suppressing his program on Facebook. On July 15, conservative speech. he posted an item about a INSIDE We warned that conser- local sheriff doing nothing vatives were under attack about “criminal illegal and that the censorship and immigrants.” Shortly PAGE 3 banning by the social media thereafter, Webster Conservative Leaders giants constituted the worst tweeted that he had been Call on Facebook to threat to free speech our “suspended from Facebook Stand Up to Antifa’s country has ever faced. for seven days” because Outrageous Violence Now, social media outlets he used the words “illegal are banning conservatives immigrants.” PAGE 4-5 almost daily. This is being Webster was censored BITS & PIECES: done, apparently, to muzzle Social media outlets are for describing a factual Extremists? conservative news on the banning conservatives situation. No Free Speech, almost daily. This is being MRC Poll, Shh! Internet going into the presi- Google is the most done, apparently, to muzzle Great-Great BS, dential election year. popular search engine in conservative news on the and Bury It! As Google Executive Jen the world. Yet it labeled the Internet going into the MiniBits Gennai admitted — in an Mueller Report, the official undercover video made by presidential election year. report that exonerated PAGE 6 Project Veritas in June — the company President Trump of “collusion” with Nationally Syndicated is “training our algorithms, like, if 2016 Russia, as “fiction” in its genre category. Column by Brent Bozell happened again, would we have … would That “fiction” label was not changed and Tim Graham: the outcome be different?” until The Washington Post reported on it Skipping the Also, last fall Gennai told Google em- on June 10. Google subsequently claimed Philly Fanatics at ployees, “We all got screwed over in 2016. that its Knowledge Graph had made an Netroots Nation The people got screwed over, the news error. The same Knowledge Graph had media got screwed over, so we’ve rapidly tagged the California GOP as the “party PAGE 7 been like, what happened there and how of Nazism” in 2018. This was also an MRC Impact do we prevent it from happening again?” error, claimed Google. Google apparently is injecting its Again in June, Project Veritas PAGE 8 liberal bias into its myriad online products published a leaked email from Google’s Join Us for the MRC’s and services. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Liam Hopkins, a member of Google’s Mediterranean Cruise and other sites seem to be doing the same “transparency and ethics group.” In the September 13-24, 2019 thing. MRC TechWatch has documented email, Hopkins described conservatives and exposed instances of this social Ben Shapiro and Dennis Prager — both media liberal bias. This, in turn, has been Jewish — and Dr. Jordan Peterson as further exposed through the various MRC “Nazis using dog whistles.” Hopkins divisions and through interviews of MRC also suggested that YouTube (owned by experts on radio and television. Continued on page 2 2 AUGUST 2019 Continued from page 1 Google) consider “disabling the suggestions feature” for these conservatives, which means their videos would no longer show up in the recommendations of other videos on the platform. Facebook has policies against violence and extremism, violations of which can lead to persons or groups being banned from its site. However, Facebook is clearly selective with this policy as the domestic terror group Antifa (and its member affiliates) has 119 pages on Facebook. Antifa engages in threats and violence against conservatives and Trump supporters all the time. In Portland (see p. 3), libertarian photojournalist Andy Ngo was severely beaten by Antifa thugs on June 29 and suffered a brain hemorrhage. Antifa doxxed and protested outside the home of Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and cracked the front door of his house. Yet the group’s Facebook page is still active. Antifa thugs rioted in D.C. during the Trump inauguration, smashing store windows and cars. Other Antifa groups have posted items on Facebook urging people to “use a brick” to “egg a Nazi,” or stated, “Concrete milkshakes are our favorite flavor.” Antifa radicals often throw “milkshakes,” made with quick-drying cement, at conservatives. Nonetheless, this left- wing terrorist group is still allowed on Facebook. The online scrapbooking site Pinterest is also censoring conservatives. Eric Cochran, who had worked at Pinterest for two years, wrote in Newsweek that the company engaged in “covert censorship of pro-lifers, Christians and Conservatives.” He noted in particular that the pro-life group GET READY Live Action (3.3 million members) was “blocked by Pinterest” and then its account was permanently removed. During a company meeting about content, Pinterest FOR 2020! employee Ifeoma Ozuma reportedly described Jewish conservative Ben Shapiro as a “white supremacist.” Project Veritas reported this on Twitter and then was temporarily With your support we were able to SURPASS suspended by the social media platform. and make the deposit on a OUR GOAL In early June, YouTube removed a Project Veritas video number of the incredible billboards for the about the censorship of conservatives at Pinterest. In DNC in Milwaukee next year! addition, the social media site Reddit suspended users who Here’s the final total: posted the video or linked to it. In late June, Twitter announced a new program that flags (donations from members) $27,957 tweets it finds politically offensive and requires users to click + $50,000 (from our major donor match offer) through a warning before they can actually see the tweet. = $77,957 !!!! The policy applies to “all verified political candidates and Because of you, as the leftist media and their government officials with more than 100,000 followers,” but seems intentionally designed to target President Trump. crazed liberal allies descend on Milwaukee in The censorship by Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, 2020, everywhere they turn they’ll be reminded and other Internet sites, puts everything conservatives have of the fact that Americans “Don’t Believe the fought for at risk. The Internet is truly the new battleground Liberal Media!” for liberal media bias and the MRC is fighting against this bias It’s going to drive them crazy — again! And we every day. can’t wait. We’re so thankful for your support! You can help by making a donation to our non-profit The leftist media and their tech giant cronies organization. Use the reply card and postage-paid envelope might have a bigger megaphone, but, with the enclosed with this newsletter to send your most generous gift help of patriotic Americans like you, we can today. Thank you. take them on every step of the way. Sincerely, Thank you again and stay tuned for all the exciting things we’ve got coming your way! L. Brent Bozell III Founder and President AUGUST 2019 3 Conservative Leaders Call on Facebook to Stand Up To Antifa’s Outrageous Violence The radical, left-wing domestic terrorist “The attack on journalist Andy Ngo is not fake news, is not group Antifa (“anti-fascist”) has been attacking merely words that people claim is hurtful, but is a serious conservatives and Trump supporters since 2017, and violent crime. Facebook needs to explain why it moves employing violence and brutality to destroy property to de-platform and stifle the voices of peaceful conservatives while allowing its platform to be used by radical leftist and injure people. In a June 29 attack in Portland, fascists like Rose City Antifa to organize events that routinely Ore., online photojournalist Andrew Ngo was beaten result in violent assaults against innocent bystanders.” up by Antifa terrorists — dressed all in black and — Heartland Institute Interim President Jim Lakely wearing masks — and suffered a brain hemorrhage “By continuing to allow Antifa- and a torn ear lobe. related groups to spew hate on Despite Antifa’s use of its platform, Facebook executives violence and incitement of and its board of directors are violence, Facebook allows the now tacitly encouraging violence terrorist group to use its social against conservatives. Facebook’s media platform to organize and opposition to my proposal seeking communicate while it censors ideological balance on the and de-platforms conservative company’s board is proof positive that it has no interest in hearing groups. from conservatives.” In response to this tacit — Justin Danhof, general counsel, support for domestic terrorism, National Center for Public Policy Research MRC President Brent Bozell and “As a former journalist myself, other conservative leaders, there’s no excuse whatsoever on July 3, called on Facebook for my former profession not to enforce its policy against exposing Antifa for what it is, a violent groups equally. Below terrorist communistic controlled are some of their statements. anti-American hate group. I’m disgusted with my former “The Department of Homeland profession’s lack of objective Security has classified Antifa’s reporting. Sad.” activities as ‘domestic terrorist — 60 Plus Association Chairman Jim violence.’ … [Facebook’s] Martin community standards certainly condemn violence and they “The hypocrisy of Facebook is stunning. It shamelessly claim to have ‘always banned individuals or organizations censors conservative opinions while allowing Antifa, which that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of routinely assaults journalists, to operate freely.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Booksellers, the First Amendment, and Controversial Texts
    January 2020 Tuesday Topic: Booksellers, The First Amendment, and Controversial Texts Welcome to Tuesday Topics, a monthly series covering topics with intellectual freedom implications for libraries of all types. Each message is prepared by a member of OLA's Intellectual Freedom Committee or a guest writer. Questions can be directed to the author of the topic or to the IFC Committee. Booksellers, the First Amendment, and Controversial Texts In the wake of the January 6th attack on the US Capitol, at least two booksellers have either elected to remove titles related to white supremacist violence from sale, or been pressed to do so by concerned citizens. Amazon.com has removed The Turner Diaries from its store, along with merchandise associated with the group QAnon, citing violation of its terms of service. The Turner Diaries, which was published in 1978 by William Luther Pierce under the pseudonym Andrew Macdonald, depicts a fictional coup in the US conducted by an underground group of white supremacists. It has been cited as a foundational text by modern racist and white nationalist groups, most famously in relation to the 1995 bombing of the Federal building in Oklahoma City. The availability of Andy Ngo’s forthcoming book, Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy, on the Powell’s Books website was the subject of protests in Portland during the week following the Capitol attack, as well. Powell’s has chosen to continue to sell the book through its online store, but will not carry physical copies of the books on its shelves. In an open letter published on the Powell’s website, President and owner Emily Powell cited the bookstore’s continued support of freedom of speech and public discourse in the decision to retain the title.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEN FREELON CHARLTON D. MCILWAIN MEREDITH D. CLARK About the Authors: Deen Freelon Is an Assistant Professor of Communication at American University
    BEYOND THE HASHTAGS DEEN FREELON CHARLTON D. MCILWAIN MEREDITH D. CLARK About the authors: Deen Freelon is an assistant professor of communication at American University. Charlton D. McIlwain is an associate professor of media, culture and communi- cation and Associate Dean for Faculty Development and Diversity at New York University. Meredith D. Clark is an assistant professor of digital and print news at the University of North Texas. Please send any questions or comments about this report to Deen Freelon at freelon@american.edu. About the Center For Media & Social Impact: The Center for Media & Social Impact at American University’s School of Communication, based in Washington, D.C., is an innovation lab and research center that creates, studies, and showcases media for social impact. Fo- cusing on independent, documentary, entertainment and public media, the Center bridges boundaries between scholars, producers and communication practitioners across media production, media impact, public policy, and audience engagement. The Center produces resources for the field and academic research; convenes conferences and events; and works collaboratively to understand and design media that matters. www.cmsimpact.org Internal photos: Philip Montgomery Graphic design and layout: openbox9 The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from the Spencer Foundation, without which this project would not have been possible. We also thank Ryan Blocher, Frank Franco, Cate Jackson, and Sedale McCall for transcribing participant interviews; David Proper and Kate Sheppard for copyediting; and Mitra Arthur, Caty Borum Chattoo, Brigid Maher, and Vincent Terlizzi for assisting with the report’s web presence and PR. The views expressed in this report are the authors’ alone and are not necessarily shared by the Spencer Foundation or the Center for Media and Social Impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Nation 2019
    REPORT TO THE NATION: 2019 FACTBOOK ON HATE & EXTREMISM IN THE U.S. & INTERNATIONALLY TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................3 Executive Summary: Report to the Nation, 2019…………………………………………………………………......................5–95 I. LATEST 2018 MAJOR U.S. CITY DATA………………………………………………………………………......................5 II. BIAS BY CITY IN 2018…………………………………………………………………......................................................6 III: 2019/2018 Latest Major U.S. City Trends: By City & Bias Motive………………………………………..................7 IV: OFFICIAL FBI & BJS DATA………………………………… ……………………………………………..........................12 V: EXTREMIST AND MASS HOMICIDES……………………………………………...................................................18 VI: HATE MIGRATES AND INCREASES ONLINE……………………………………………………………....................22 VII: RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION CONTINUES…………………………………………….................29 VIII: FLUCTUATIONS AROUND CATALYTIC EVENTS AND POLITICS……………………………………..............32 IX: U.S. NGO DATA OVERVIEW – EXTREMIST GROUPS………………………………………….………..................38 X: U.S. NGO DATA – RELIGION & ETHNIC HATE …………………………………….............................................39 XI: U.S. NGO DATA – EMERGING HATREDS: HOMELESS, TRANSGENDER & JOURNALISTS ……….........44 XII: POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND THREATS………………………………………………………………….....................48 XIII: HATE CRIME VICTIMS AND OFFENDERS…………………………………………………..…………....................54 XIV: HATE CRIME PROSECUTIONS……………………………………………………………………………....................61 XV: HATE
    [Show full text]
  • The Oregonian Portland Mayor and Chief Warn Protest Instigators
    The Oregonian Portland mayor and chief warn protest instigators: Expect stern police response By Gordon Friedman August 6, 2019 Demonstrators wishing to commit acts of violence or vandalism during a gathering planned for Aug. 17 in Portland should expect to be met with the full force of the law, Mayor Ted Wheeler and Police Chief Danielle Outlaw warned on Monday. In an interview at City Hall with The Oregonian/OregonLive, the pair, who collectively lead Portland’s police force, voiced their toughest stance yet against people using the cloak of free speech as a pretext to brawl on city streets. Wheeler stated repeatedly — 18 times in all — that he rejects the violence and subversion of free speech perpetrated by demonstrators, regardless of their politics. He promised a zero-tolerance approach, saying anyone who breaks the law during the demonstration next week should expect swift action by the police and raised the prospect of “mass arrests.” He indicated an extra-large presence of law enforcement officers, from outside agencies as well as the Portland Police Bureau, will be on hand to ensure that happens. And the mayor issued a stern repudiation of would-be instigators: “We don’t want you,” he said. He added, “But if you do come, we will be ready for you.” That echoes a message delivered by Outlaw, who said, “Don’t come. We don’t want you here. I don’t care what side you’re on.’’ Right-wing activists from around the country have indicated they plan to hold an “End Domestic Terrorism” gathering on Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldaw-JCC Tuesday Morning Men's Hour
    Moldaw-JCC Tuesday morning Men’s hour 8:30am free-for-all. 8:45am old-business. 9:00am new-business. 10am free-for-all Claerbout’s schedule and history Refresh to bring up-to-date. For each video link, I’ll tell you about it, then turn it on for maybe two minutes, and then invite group thoughts and discussion. Hopefully, some of you will have looked it over in advance and have found valuable thoughts for us. You are welcome to bring in links of your own. You introduce a link. I’ll broadcast it for a few minutes (starting from your predetermined best jump-in time). Then we’ll invite group thoughts and comments. If your link is text, you can talk about it and read a few minutes of it. I have no advertisements on Youtube because I pay $15/month to have them stripped out. 8:30am free-for-all. 8:45am old-business. 9:00am new-business. 10am free-for-all March 16 1. Dominic Frisbee, British Libertarian Love Songs (6:20) 2. Why the disconnect between intellectuals and the working class (6:34)? Jordan Peterson 3. Putin tells a joke about the Israeli army (0:38) 4. CNN, MSNTV coverup for Andrew Cuomo (10:42) 5. How planetary gears work (4:53) 6. ”NuVinci Mechanism for a continuously-variable bicycle gear shift (2:58). 7. Clash over Tulsi Gabbard: Democratic Strategist versus The Hill (11:17) 8. Indonesian volcano Sinabung eruption 11 June 2019 (2:17) A lake view (map) 9. NSA insider retiree reveals how lies got the USA into two wars (26:56) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks at the Turning Point
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks at the Turning Point U.S.A. Student Action Summit in West Palm Beach, Florida December 21, 2019 The President. Well, thank you very much. Thank you, everybody. What a group. What a group. What a group. I also want to thank a true American legend and a beloved national hero, Rush Limbaugh. Thank you, Rush. You know, I don't know if you know it or not: He's got like 39 million people listening. He's been—from day one, he's been so incredible. Good times, bad times, he doesn't waver, because he's tough as hell. He makes like—they tell me he makes like $50 million a year. And it may be—that may be on the low side. So if anybody wants to be a nice conservative talk show host, it's not a bad living. I will say. But I have to say, he's a very unique guy, and he's a great man, and he's been a great friend. So thank you to Rush. Thank you. And let me begin by wishing you a beautiful—look, do you remember this? Do you remember they were trying to take "Christmas" out of Christmas? Do you remember? Audience members. Boo! The President. They didn't want to let you say "Merry Christmas." You would go around, you'd see department stores that have everything—red, snow, beautiful ribbons, bows. Everything was there, but they wouldn't say "Merry Christmas." They're all saying "Merry Christmas" again.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and Restraint Within Antifa: a View from the United States by Nigel Copsey and Samuel Merrill
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 14, Issue 6 Violence and Restraint within Antifa: A View from the United States by Nigel Copsey and Samuel Merrill Abstract In recent months recurrent calls have been made by conservative right-wing politicians to designate Antifa a “domestic terrorist organization” in the United States. Fixated on the spectacle of its Black Bloc tactics they have equated Antifa, what is essentially an ad-hoc, non-hierarchical, geographically dispersed social movement comprised of local autonomous activist groups, with organized violent extremists. And yet, the evidence for such an equation has been mostly limited to a handful of instances that usually bare the hallmarks of political exaggeration or are alternatively attributable to individuals loosely associated with the Antifa movement. Why is this so? How do militant anti-fascists in the US understand violence and exercise restraint in their use of it? This article seeks an answer to these questions based on interviews with activists from Portland’s Rose City Antifa, one of the United States’ most well-known Antifa groups, and an analysis of a collection of the group’s Tweets. It reveals that Antifa exercises considerable restraint, internally and externally, with regards to both the literal and rhetorical use of violence within its street and digital activism. In turn it calls upon others to exercise reciprocal levels of restraint by ceasing their labelling of Antifa as a “domestic terrorist” organization. Keywords: Antifa, anti-fascism, restraint, violence, terrorism, street activism, digital activism I would say if we describe violence as being like, you know, a Richard Spencer face punch, I would say based on simply being a fascist, all fascists deserve, at a minimum, a Richard Spencer face punch.[1] I don’t think that people necessarily will go off the handle.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Report 3.0 Page 02
    BLACKBIRD.AI COVID-19 REPORT 3.0 PAGE 02 INTRODUCTION Blackbird.AI’s Intelligence Report responds to ongoing requests for insights into disinformation activity and threats around recent events across digital media. These insights are generated by Blackbird.AI’s AI-driven disinformation analysis platform. This analyzed 119,069,559 social media posts, between MAY 2 - MAY 20, 2020 with over surfaced as manipulated with a . 32,148,780 posts Blackbird Manipulation Index (BBMI) of 27% Blackbird.AI’s Constellation Platform clusters and visualizes entities (e.g. hashtags, URLs, images) in 3-D space to illuminate underlying narratives within social media discourse. Constellation's graphing capability visualizes narratives as nodes, forming coherent visual concepts. When combined with Blackbird's proprietary machine learning algorithms, Constellation reveals the critical threats worthy of further investigation which aids analysts in discerning anomalous patterns and harmful influence campaigns rapidly and efficiently. In the visual shown above, the cluster in the upper-left represents a far-right conspiracy cluster (blue) on one side of the ecosystem and a “StayAtHome” group driving a counter-narrative on the other side (green) In a time of widespread uncertainty, panic, economic pressures and geopolitical tensions, the value of information clarity and integrity has never been greater. 2020 has been a pressure cooker of consecutive changes with countries declaring state of emergencies and implementing sudden lockdown measures that have resulted in uncharted levels of isolation among the public. These changes have forced global communities to adapt and deal with a newfound fear and paranoia against the virus, our governments and even our livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • [FINAL] Portland Protests 2020: CRC Summary and Recommendations
    Portland Protests 2020: Citizen Review Committee Summary and Recommendations Presented by the Crowd Control and Use of Force Workgroup Citizen Review Committee Authors: Candace Avalos (Chair) Sylvan Fraser Taylor Snell Yume Delegato Community Member Authors: Barbara Christiansen Elizabeth Knight Michael Walsh Justine Vernigan Melora Golden Jake Dockter 1 I. Executive Summary The purpose of the Citizen Review Committee’s Crowd Control and Use of Force workgroup (CCUFWG) is to critically examine the Portland Police Bureau’s (PPB) use of force policies, training, and tactics in order to make recommendations based on best practices and legal standards. In response to the murder of George Floyd by police in May 2020, thousands of Portlanders took to the streets daily for months in protest of police brutality and the disproportionate impact on communities of color. During these protests, many concerning confrontations between Portland Police and the community occurred. In response, this workgroup set out to gather community input about what was happening on the ground at protests through a public forum and online surveys. This document compiles the information we gathered and the recommendations we have generated based on thorough analysis of community feedback, discussion with PPB leadership, and review of existing policies, established best practices, and legal standards. Our recommendations for improved policing practices to facilitate the First Amendment rights of all Portlanders cover the categories of equipment use, de-escalation, bias, and training. The recommendations summarized below are explained and elaborated upon in Section IV of this report. ● Equipment Use Recommendations: ○ Make permanent the existing ban on the use of CS gas by PPB, and extend it to other chemical weapons used for crowd management.
    [Show full text]
  • Jab343.Pdf (9.410Mb)
    ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND HUMAN INTERVENTIONS: DISTRIBUTING TELEVISION NEWS ONLINE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Joshua Albert Braun August 2011 © 2011 Joshua Albert Braun ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND HUMAN INTERVENTIONS: DISTRIBUTING TELEVISION NEWS ONLINE Joshua Albert Braun, Ph.D. Cornell University 2011 This manuscript examines distribution of television news products online, and includes case studies from observation and interviewing at the sister companies, MSNBC.com and MSNBC TV. In particular, I focus heavily on the cases of The Rachel Maddow Show, a news program that created a unique and highly popular Web presence; a team of Web producers at MSNBC.com responsible for handling television content; and Newsvine, a subsidiary of MSNBC.com that has built much of the infrastructure on which MSNBC television sites are based. I argue the forging of distribution paths is best understood through the frameworks provided by the sociology of socio-technical systems, and using the cases at hand, illustrate the implications of this perspective for sociological perspectives more commonly used to study media organizations. I use John Law’s framework of heterogeneous engineering, in tandem with insights from other sociologists of systems, as a springboard to examine the manner in which MSNBC.com has assembled diverse resources into a working, but highly dynamic, system of online distribution for television. I argue large contemporary media organizations are best understood, not as single, monolithic system builders, but as assemblages of myriad heterogeneous engineers pursuing related, but provincial objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Motion
    1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON 7 FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 8 CIDER RIOT, LLC; and ABRAM Case No. 19CV20231 9 GOLDMAN-ARMSTRONG, 10 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT PATRIOT PRAYER USA, 11 v. LLC’S & JOSEPH “JOEY” GIBSON’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 12 PATRIOT PRAYER USA, LLC; JOSEPH SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE “JOEY” GIBSON; IAN KRAMER; 13 CHRISTOPHER PONTE; DAVID WILLIS; MACKENZIE LEWIS; MATTHEW 14 COOPER; and JOHN DOES 1-25. 15 Defendants. 16 17 Preliminary Statement 18 Mr. Joey Gibson “has unpopular thoughts about freedom, guns, abortion and spirituality, 19 and he voices them on a public stage”. E. Hovde, The Oregonian, “The misunderstood Joey 20 Gibson,” Oct. 28, 2018 (copy submitted herewith as Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Joey Gibson in 21 Support of Motion to Strike (“Gibson Strike Decl.”) This is a textbook case of a Strategic Lawsuit 22 Against Public Participation (“SLAPP”), in which plaintiffs unabashedly seek to misuse the Courts 23 of Oregon as a tool to silence Mr. Gibson’s First Amendment activity in what is quintessentially 24 public space for First Amendment activities: the streets and sidewalks of Portland. 25 Plaintiffs are closely identified with “Antifa,” a loosely structured group of organizations, 26 that seek to replace American Constitutional government by any means necessary with what they 27 1 DEFENDANT PATRIOT PRAYER USA, LLC’S & JOSEPH “JOEY” James L. Buchal, (OSB 921618) 28 GIBSON’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SPECIAL MOTION TO MURPHY & BUCHAL LLP STRIKE 3425 SE Yamhill Street, Suite 100 Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLAINT Page 1 of 17 Juan C. Chavez, OSB #136428 Email
    Case 3:19-cv-01301 Document 1 Filed 08/17/19 Page 1 of 17 Juan C. Chavez, OSB #136428 Email: jchavez@ojrc.info PO Box 5248 Portland, OR 97208 Telephone: 503 944-2270 ext. 212 Facsimile: 971-275-1839 AttorneyS for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION LUIS ENRIQUE MARQUEZ, CaSe No. Plaintiffs, v. COMPLAINT JOSEPH BIGGS; TARA LAROSA; and JOHN State Tort Claim (Defamation, FalSe Light, DOES 1-100. Intentional Infliction of Emotional DiStreSS, and Negligence) DefendantS. Diversity JuriSdiction: 28 U.S. Code § 1332 Amount in Controversy: $322,000 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL INTRODUCTION 1. In July 2019, Mr. Marquez received word from Portland Police Bureau Officer CombS that there were “credible” threatS against hiS life. ThiS threat related to an event that will be occurring in Portland, OR on August 17, 2019, entitled “End DomeStic TerroriSm,” wherein right-wing faSciStS wiSh to violently confront “Antifa,” whom they perceive aS a threat. DefendantS Biggs, LaRosa, and AdamS have directed, encourage, and facilitated the organization COMPLAINT Page 1 of 17 Case 3:19-cv-01301 Document 1 Filed 08/17/19 Page 2 of 17 of a dangerous far-right lynch mob intent on injuring Mr. Marquez, aS evidenced in the imageS below. [Image deScription: Facebook posts on the page “End DomeStic TerroriSm.” The image to the left depictS Mr. Marquez with a rifle crosShair over hiS forehead. The image giveS the date and time of the “End DomeStic Terrorist’S [sic]” event organized by Defendant Biggs. The image to the right depictS Mr.
    [Show full text]