DOCSLIB.ORG

Representations of Jewish-Muslim Relations In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Representations of Jewish-Muslim Relations In REPRESENTATIONS OF JEWISH-MUSLIM RELATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY FRANCE A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2020 Adi S. Bharat School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents Abstract 4 Declaration 5 Copyright 6 Dedication 7 Acknowledgments 8 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 9 1.1. Terminology: Jews, Muslims, Relations, Interactions 11 1.2. Universalism and Difference 15 1.3. Jewish-Muslim Relations in Twentieth-Century France 35 1.4. Methodology, Corpus, and Overview 53 CHAPTER TWO: JEWISH-MUSLIM RELATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY NEWSPAPER DISCOURSE 56 2.1. Methodology 57 2.2. Contextualizing Le Figaro and Le Monde 62 2.2.1. Ethnoreligious Biases 62 2.2.2. Contemporary Standing 66 2.3. Historical and Socio-Political Contexts (1970-2018) 69 2.4. Analysis and Discussion 74 2.4.1. Frames 74 2.4.2. Corpus Analysis 77 2.4.3. Discourse Analysis 89 2.5. Conclusion 98 CHAPTER THREE: JEWISH-MUSLIM RELATIONS IN RECENT NOVELS 100 3.1. Novels and Authors 101 3.2. Existing Scholarship 104 2 3.3. Analysis and Discussion 109 3.3.1. Le sourire de l’ange 110 3.3.2. Ce sont nos frères et leurs enfants sont nos enfants 130 3.3.3. Avant la haine 149 3.4. Conclusion 169 CHAPTER FOUR: JEWISH-MUSLIM INTERRELIGIOUS AND INTERCULTURAL INITIATIVES 174 4.1. Defining Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue 177 4.2. History of Interreligious Dialogue Initiatives in France 180 4.3. Contemporary Jewish-Muslim Dialogue Initiatives 184 4.3.1. Overview of Contemporary Actors 184 4.3.2. Interreligious Dialogue and the State 187 4.4. Methodology 194 4.4.1. Fleeting Interactions and Thin Description 194 4.4.2. Recruiting Participants and the Interview Process 196 4.4.3. Thematic Analysis 198 4.5. Analysis and Discussion 200 4.5.1. Diverging and Intersecting Affliations and Identifications 201 4.5.2. The State, Media, and Politicians 208 4.5.3. Le mahJ et l’IMA 216 4.5.4. Queering Jewish-Muslim Relations? HM2F and Beit Haverim 224 4.6. Conclusion 233 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS 236 Bibliography 249 Appendix 269 Word count: 77,013 3 Abstract This thesis examines representations of Jewish-Muslim relations in contemporary French newspaper discourse, literary writing, and interreligious dialogue initiatives. Specifically, it analyses the extent to which a dominant discourse of inherently tense binary Jewish-Muslim relations exists and how individual Jewish and Muslim writers and interreligious dialogue activists navigate this difficult socio-political terrain. While I conceptualize some aspects of literary writing and interreligious dialogue as counter-narratives, this thesis does not simply seek to counterbalance the dominant narrative of polarization found in the media, but to demonstrate, first, how this narrative constructs public Jewish and Muslim identities and shapes the terrain on which interactions between Jews and Muslims occur. My thesis reveals that Jewish and Muslim writers and interreligious activists are deeply invested in challenging the oppositional model of Jewish-Muslim relations. However, my research also suggests that their level of success depends in large part on their ability to navigate normative understandings of Jewishness and Muslimness that are often overdetermined by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. First, this thesis traces how Jewish-Muslim relations are defined and constructed in the media, focusing on the national dailies Le Monde and Le Figaro due to their considerable agenda-setting and framing power as elite and prestigious sites of journalistic expression. Subsequently, I consider how a set of contemporary novelists, Emilie Frèche, Thierry Cohen, and Nadia Hathroubi-Safsaf, formulate their visions of intergroup relations within this broader context. The novelists in this project have been included in the extent to which their works can be read as—and often are explicitly stated by these authors to be—a set of political interventions into the contemporary and highly politicized category of Jewish-Muslim relations. Finally, I examine how Jewish and Muslim activists promote interreligious dialogue and the challenges they face in doing so within a French republican framework that privileges the non-differentiation of ethnoreligious specificities. I conclude that the initiatives most likely to effectively challenge the dominant model of polarized Jewish-Muslim relations in contemporary France are those that de- emphasize Jewishness and Muslimness as separate and mutually exclusive categories, and instead emphasize hybrid identities and shared histories, while adopting an embodied, differentiated approach to solidarity. 4 Declaration I declare that no portion of the work referred to in the thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning. 5 Copyright The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns certain copyright or related right in it (the “Copyright”) and he has given The University of Manchester certain rights to use such Copyright, including for administrative purposes. Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts and whether in hard or electronic copy, may be made only in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) and regulations issues under it or, where appropriate, in accordance with licensing agreements which the University has from time to time. This page must form part of any such copies made. The ownership of certain Copyright, patents, designs, trademarks and other intellectual property (the “Intellectual Property”) and any reproductions of copyright works in the thesis, for example graphs and tables (“Reproductions”), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the prior written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property and/or Reproductions. Further information on the conditions under which disclosure, publication and commercialisation of this thesis, the Copyright and any Intellectual Property and/or Reproductions described in it may take place is available in the University IP Policy (see http://documents.manchester.ac.uk/DocuInfo.aspx?DocID=24420) in any relevant Thesis restriction declarations deposited in the University Library, The University Library’s regulations (see http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/about/regulations/) and in The University’s policy on Presentation of Theses. 6 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the memory and legacy of Malcolm X whose life and work have been of utmost importance to my life-long, unfinished process of intellectual and spiritual decolonization, a process he once described as removing colonialism from the mind. 7 Acknowledgments All academic work is, to some degree, collaborative, especially multi-year projects such as a doctoral thesis. My sincerest thanks and gratitude go, first and foremost, to my supervisors, Joseph McGonagle and Barbara Lebrun, whose exemplary guidance and support proved invaluable to the successful completion of this thesis. I am also very grateful to Dalia Mostafa for her detailed feedback on the main chapters of this thesis. I would also like to thank all the participants I interviewed for the last chapter of this thesis. I am particularly grateful to Nadia Hathroubi-Safsaf and Thierry Cohen for discussing their work with me at great length. I am deeply grateful for the seemingly inexhaustible source of support that has been Jeffrey Mehlman, a remarkable thinker who continues to inspire me with his adventures in the French Trade. I can only hope that my adventures end up half as meaningful as his. I also benefited greatly from the support of my colleagues in Manchester. The Centre for Jewish Studies, in particular, provided me with a second academic home. I am indebted to Jean-Marc Dreyfus, Alexander Samely, Daniel Langton, and Laura Mitchell for their support and kindness. I would be remiss if I did not also mention David Alderson, the director of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in the Arts and Languages (CIDRAL) and a brilliant conversationalist. David and CIDRAL have been of great moral and intellectual assistance to me. Finally, I thank Katharine Halls, with whom I founded the Jewish-Muslim Research Network (JMRN). The JMRN has proved to be an invaluable interdisciplinary forum. I am also grateful to Elizabeth Johnstone for all her help and solidarity. Last, but not least, I thank my family, friends, and cats back in Singapore for their constant support, even if they have not always understood what I have been doing all these years. 8 Chapter One: Introduction and Background In recent decades, with antisemitism and Islamophobia on the rise, relations between France’s Jews and Muslims have been depicted as increasingly tense. In particular, a group of French writers have pinpointed the source of a new antisemitism to be France’s Muslim population (Brenner 2002, 2004; Draï 2002; Taguieff 2002; Trigano 2003; Finkielkraut 2003; Attal 2004; Giniewski 2005). With state school seen as a hotbed of antisemitism, Jews have increasingly turned to private Jewish schools. According to Kimberly Arkin (2014), this sense of siege has in turn led to private-schooled (mainly Sephardi) Jewish youths racially constructing their Jewishness as separate from and hostile to Muslims and Arabs (and ‘white’ French people), as a defence mechanism to a perception of being under attack from both broader French society and, especially, Muslims and Arabs. This situation is partly a result of the particular histories of France’s colonial presence in the Maghreb and of France’s related postcolonial realities (see Chronology, Table 1 in Appendix). Economic crisis, high unemployment rates, especially for segments of Muslims, increasing antisemitic and anti-Muslim discourse and hate crimes, as well as the looming threat of further acts of terrorism, have only complicated issues and hardened outlooks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solidarität Der Österreichischen Linken Mit Der Algerischen Widerstandsbewegung
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Solidarität der österreichischen Linken mit der algerischen Widerstandsbewegung Keller, F. Publication date 2010 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Keller, F. (2010). Solidarität der österreichischen Linken mit der algerischen Widerstandsbewegung. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:05 Oct 2021 Solidarität der österreichischen Linken mit der algerischen Widerstandsbewegung ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. D.C. van den Boom ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Agnietenkapel] op dinstag 15 juni 2010, te 12:00 uur door Friedrich Keller geboren te Wenen, Oostenrijk Promotor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Hate Crime Survey
    2008 Hate Crime Survey About Human Rights First HRF’s Fighting Discrimination Program Human Rights First believes that building respect for human The Fighting Discrimination Program has been working since rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which 2002 to reverse the rising tide of antisemitic, racist, anti- every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, Muslim, anti-immigrant, and homophobic violence and other intolerance, and violence. bias crime in Europe, the Russian Federation, and North America. We report on the reality of violence driven by Human Rights First protects people at risk: refugees who flee discrimination, and work to strengthen the response of persecution, victims of crimes against humanity or other mass governments to combat this violence. We advance concrete, human rights violations, victims of discrimination, those whose practical recommendations to improve hate crimes legislation rights are eroded in the name of national security, and human and its implementation, monitoring and public reporting, the rights advocates who are targeted for defending the rights of training of police and prosecutors, the work of official anti- others. These groups are often the first victims of societal discrimination bodies, and the capacity of civil society instability and breakdown; their treatment is a harbinger of organizations and international institutions to combat violent wider-scale repression. Human Rights First works to prevent hate crimes. For more information on the program, visit violations against these groups and to seek justice and www.humanrightsfirst.org/discrimination or email accountability for violations against them. [email protected]. Human Rights First is practical and effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State
    Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State By Neil Grant Landers A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in French in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Debarati Sanyal, Co-Chair Professor Soraya Tlatli, Co-Chair Professor Karl Britto Professor Stefania Pandolfo Fall 2013 1 Abstract of the Dissertation Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State by Neil Grant Landers Doctor of Philosophy in French Literature University of California, Berkeley Professor Debarati Sanyal, Co-Chair Professor Soraya Tlatli, Co-Chair Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State addresses the way the Algerian civil war has been portrayed in 1990s novelistic literature. In the words of one literary critic, "The Algerian war has been, in a sense, one big murder mystery."1 This may be true, but literary accounts portray the "mystery" of the civil war—and propose to solve it—in sharply divergent ways. The primary aim of this study is to examine how three of the most celebrated 1990s novels depict—organize, analyze, interpret, and "solve"—the civil war. I analyze and interpret these novels—by Assia Djebar, Yasmina Khadra, and Boualem Sansal—through a deep contextualization, both in terms of Algerian history and in the novels' contemporary setting. This is particularly important in this case, since the civil war is so contested, and is poorly understood. Using the novels' thematic content as a cue for deeper understanding, I engage through them and with them a number of elements crucial to understanding the civil war: Algeria's troubled nationalist legacy; its stagnant one-party regime; a fear, distrust, and poor understanding of the Islamist movement and the insurgency that erupted in 1992; and the unending, horrifically bloody violence that piled on throughout the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving-Nowhere.Pdf
    MA’AN Development Center MOVINGMOVING NOWHERE: FIRING ZONES AND FORCIBLE TRANSFER IN THE JORDAN VALLEY NOWHERE FIRING ZONES AND FORCIBLE TRANSFER IN THE JORDAN VALLEY 1 2 MOVINGMOVING NOWHERE: FIRING ZONES AND FORCIBLE TRANSFER IN THE JORDAN VALLEY NOWHERE FIRING ZONES AND FORCIBLE TRANSFER IN THE JORDAN VALLEY 2015 3 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Physical Security 6 Eviction Orders And Demolition Orders 10 Psychological Security 18 Livelihood Reductions 22 Environmental Concerns 24 Water 26 Settler Violence 28 Isuues Faced By Other Communities In Area C 32 International Humanitarian Law 36 Conclusion 40 Photo by Hamza Zbiedat Hamza by Photo 4 Moving Nowhere Introduction Indirect and direct forcible transfer is currently at the forefront of Israel’s ideological agenda in area C. Firing zones, initially established as a means of land control, are now being used to create an environment so hostile that Palestinians are forced to leave the area or live in conditions of deteriorating security. re-dating the creation of the state of Israel, there was an ideological agenda within Pcertain political spheres predicated on the notion that Israel should exist from the sea to the Jordan River. Upon creation of the State the subsequent governments sought to establish this notion. This has resulted in an uncompromising programme of colonisation, ethnic cleansing and de-development in Palestine. The conclusion of the six day war in 1967 marked the beginning of the ongoing occupation, under which the full force of the ideological agenda has been extended into the West Bank. Israel has continuously led projects and policies designed to appropriate vast amounts of Palestinian land in the West Bank, despite such actions being illegal under international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Killings</Em>
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Michigan School of Law Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 39 Issue 2 2018 Targeting the Targeted Killings Case - International Lawmaking in Domestic Contexts Yahli Shereshevsky Hebrew University of Jerusalem Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Yahli Shereshevsky, Targeting the Targeted Killings Case - International Lawmaking in Domestic Contexts, 39 MICH. J. INT'L L. 241 (2018). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol39/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TARGETING THE TARGETED KILLINGS CASE – INTERNATIONAL LAWMAKING IN DOMESTIC CONTEXTS Yahli Shereshevsky* INTRODUCTION ................................................. 242 I. THE DEBATE OVER TARGETED KILLINGS ............... 244 A. Three Main Controversies in the International Law Debate over Targeted Killings ....................... 244 B. Targeted Killings in Israel: From the Targeted Killings Case to the 2014 Gaza Conflict ............. 247 1. The Targeted Killings Case ..................... 247 2. The 2014 Gaza Conflict Report ................. 249 II. THREE COMPLEMENTARY EXPLANATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE FORMAL MEMBERSHIP APPROACH: JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, THE U.S. LEGAL POSITION AND THE INTERPRETIVE COMMUNITY OF MILITARY LAWYERS, AND A PRESSING NEED ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of German Anti-Semitism
    Chapter 1 Writings on the Wall Chapter 1 A Concise History of German Anti-Semitism In 1942, in a suburb of Berlin known as Wannsee, Reinhard Heydrich (head of the infamous Nazi secret police, the Gestapo) finalized the Nazi commitment to the extermination of the Jews within the Third Reich’s sphere of influence (Gilbert 281). According to some historians, these announcements made at Wannsee were the culmination of step-by-step decisions that had brought about what Adolf Hitler meant when, in 1920, he announced the Nazi party’s position that “None but members of the Nation may be citizens of the State. None but those of German blood, whatever their creed, may be members of the Nation. No Jew, therefore, may be a member of the Nation” (qtd. in Gilbert 23). Both ancient and contemporary European and German anti-Semitic forces were about to collide in Wannsee. That collision tragically ignited one of history’s most devastating and most documented genocidal conflagrations—what today is commonly called the “Holocaust.” Some historians suggest the Holocaust was the result of the Nazi targeting of Jews as scapegoats by suggesting that world-Jewry collectively had had something to do with the “stab in the back” that brought the World War I German war effort and World War I itself to a turbulent end. Some researchers suggest European Jewry was singled out for “special treatment” because they, the Jews, were somehow responsible for the unexpectedly final battlefield- failures, the consequent enormous war reparation payments, the collapsing stock markets and the subsequent spiraling inflation that financially crippled the German nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Gaza War Assessment: the New Face of Conflict
    2014 Gaza War Assessment: The New Face of Conflict A report by the JINSA-commissioned Gaza Conflict Task Force March 2015 — Task Force Members, Advisors, and JINSA Staff — Task Force Members* General Charles Wald, USAF (ret.), Task Force Chair Former Deputy Commander of United States European Command Lieutenant General William B. Caldwell IV, USA (ret.) Former Commander, U.S. Army North Lieutenant General Richard Natonski, USMC (ret.) Former Commander of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Command Major General Rick Devereaux, USAF (ret.) Former Director of Operational Planning, Policy, and Strategy - Headquarters Air Force Major General Mike Jones, USA (ret.) Former Chief of Staff, U.S. Central Command * Previous organizational affiliation shown for identification purposes only; no endorsement by the organization implied. Advisors Professor Eliot Cohen Professor of Strategic Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Lieutenant Colonel Geoffrey Corn, USA (ret.) Presidential Research Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law, Houston JINSA Staff Dr. Michael Makovsky Chief Executive Officer Dr. Benjamin Runkle Director of Programs Jonathan Ruhe Associate Director, Gemunder Center for Defense and Strategy Maayan Roitfarb Programs Associate Ashton Kunkle Gemunder Center Research Assistant . — Table of Contents — 2014 GAZA WAR ASSESSMENT: Executive Summary I. Introduction 7 II. Overview of 2014 Gaza War 8 A. Background B. Causes of Conflict C. Strategies and Concepts of Operations D. Summary of Events
    [Show full text]
  • Howard G. Brown
    1 Howard G. Brown Department of History Home address: Binghamton University 63 Dodd Road State University of New York Vestal, NY 13850 P.O. Box 6000 cell phone: 607-262-0007* Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 [email protected] telephone: (607) 777-2625 fax: (607) 777-2896 * preferred number to call Education 1990 Doctor of Philosophy Balliol College, Oxford University 1986 Master of Arts York University, Toronto 1985 Bachelor of Arts (Honours) University of Saskatchewan 1983 Bachelor of Education University of Saskatchewan Academic Positions 1994-present Assistant, Associate, Full Professor Binghamton University, SUNY 1997-98 Visiting Scholar Cornell University 1991-94 Assistant Professor University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh 1990-91 Visiting Assistant Professor Smith College 1988-89 Part-time Lecturer University of Keele, U.K. 1988 Tutor Lincoln College, Oxford Publications Books Mass Violence and the Self: From the French Wars of Religion to the Paris Commune (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, December 2018), c. 400 pp. Ending the French Revolution: Violence, Justice, and Repression from the Terror to Napoleon (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2006), 461 pp. (paperback, 2007). - received the American Historical Association’s Leo Gershoy Award for the best book in seventeenth and eighteenth-century European history in 2006 - received the University of Virginia’s Walker Cowen Prize for an outstanding work of scholarship in eighteenth-century studies (in manuscript) in 2004 Taking Liberties: Problems of a New Order from the French Revolution to Napoleon (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), 210 pp. Edited and co-authored introduction (pp. 1-19) with Judith A. Miller (simultaneous cloth and paperback). War, Revolution, and the Bureaucratic State: Politics and Army Administration in France, 1791- 1799 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 361 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Dniester Jews Between
    PARALLEL RUPTURES: JEWS OF BESSARABIA AND TRANSNISTRIA BETWEEN ROMANIAN NATIONALISM AND SOVIET COMMUNISM, 1918-1940 BY DMITRY TARTAKOVSKY DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark D. Steinberg, Chair Professor Keith Hitchins Professor Diane P. Koenker Professor Harriet Murav Assistant Professor Eugene Avrutin Abstract ―Parallel Ruptures: Jews of Bessarabia and Transnistria between Romanian Nationalism and Soviet Communism, 1918-1940,‖ explores the political and social debates that took place in Jewish communities in Romanian-held Bessarabia and the Moldovan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic during the interwar era. Both had been part of the Russian Pale of Settlement until its dissolution in 1917; they were then divided by the Romanian Army‘s occupation of Bessarabia in 1918 with the establishment of a well-guarded border along the Dniester River between two newly-formed states, Greater Romania and the Soviet Union. At its core, the project focuses in comparative context on the traumatic and multi-faceted confrontation with these two modernizing states: exclusion, discrimination and growing violence in Bessarabia; destruction of religious tradition, agricultural resettlement, and socialist re-education and assimilation in Soviet Transnistria. It examines also the similarities in both states‘ striving to create model subjects usable by the homeland, as well as commonalities within Jewish responses on both sides of the border. Contacts between Jews on either side of the border remained significant after 1918 despite the efforts of both states to curb them, thereby necessitating a transnational view in order to examine Jewish political and social life in borderland regions.
    [Show full text]
  • La Stratégie Du Guépard Ou Le « Nouveau » F.N. « Si Nous Voulons
    La stratégie du Guépard ou le « nouveau » F.N. « Si nous voulons que tout reste tel que c'est, il faut que tout change ». « Dans l’hypothèse où Marine Le Pen réussirait son pari, nous aurions une extrême-droite national-populiste débarrassée des « oripeaux du passé », avec une jeune génération sans passé compromettant. Il lui faudra alors déterminer une stratégie. Tout en se donnant l’apparence de crédibilité politique, le FN devra « radicaliser » son discours afin de retrouver un électorat, sonélectorat1. Les faits semblent donner raison à cette hypothèse deux ans après. Pourquoi le FN aurait-il régressé ? Toutes les conditions sont remplies pour qu’une extrême droite nationale – populiste prospère en France… C’est sur un fond de décor social dégradé qu’on peut essayer d’analyser ce qui s’est produit au congrès de Tours en 2011. En quittant la présidence du FN, J.M. Le Pen a tourné une page de l’histoire du FN. On peut même dire que c’est une nouvelle histoire qui commence. Deux lignes sont clairement apparues dans ce congrès nous replongeant dans l’histoire des extrêmes–droites. Il est nécessaire d’opérer un « retour en arrière afin d’éclairer le présent, tant il est vrai que l’histoire est une maladie dont on ne guérit jamais tout à fait »2 . On a pu observer l’opposition entre une droite contre-révolutionnaire et la nouvelle droite de Marine Le Pen sur une ligne qu’on pourrait qualifier de « nationale-républicaine », voire de populiste et bonapartiste. S’il y a incontestablement un changement de style, qui renvoie à une histoire différente de celle dont se réclame B.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Peace Prize Speeches
    Boualem Sansal 2011 Grossman 2010 Magris 2009 Kiefer 2008 Friedländer 2007 Lepenies 2006 Pamuk 2005 Esterházy 2004 Sontag 2003 Achebe 2002 Habermas 2001 Djebar 2000 Stern 1999 Walser 1998 Kemal 1997 Vargas Llosa 1996 Schimmel 1995 Semprún 1994 Schorlemmer 1993 Oz 1992 Konrád 1991 Dedecius 1990 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade Havel 1989 Lenz 1988 Speeches Jonas 1987 Bartoszewski 1986 Kollek 1985 Paz 1984 Sperber 1983 Kennan 1982 Kopelew 1981 Cardenal 1980 Menuhin 1979 Lindgren 1978 Kołakowski 1977 Frisch 1976 Grosser 1975 Frère Roger 1974 The Club of Rome 1973 Korczak 1972 Dönhoff 1971 Myrdal 1970 Mitscherlich 1969 Senghor 1968 Bloch 1967 Bea/Visser 't Hooft 1966 Sachs 1965 Marcel 1964 Weizsäcker 1963 Tillich 1962 Radhakrishnan 1961 Gollancz 1960 Heuss 1959 Jaspers 1958 Wilder 1957 Schneider 1956 Hesse 1955 Burckhardt 1954 Buber 1953 Guardini 1952 Schweitzer 1951 Tau 1950 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade 2011 Gottfried Honnefelder, President of the German Publishers and Booksellers Association Greeting Humankind’s richness lies in its diversity cultures that have always accompanied human and colorfulness. Indeed, who would want to do history. without the variety of ethnicities, each of which is a unique combination of heritage, language, No one knows the simultaneous richness religion and culture. Together, this variety of and potential threat of ethnic diversity – a diver- differences forms an almost inexhaustible spect- sity born of an abundance of histories, languages rum of perspectives – each of which is equally and religions – better than someone who not different and distinct – with which we view the only lives and speaks in it, but also writes about world and ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Air and Missile Defense During the 2014 Gaza
    Israel’s Air and Missile Defense During the 2014 Gaza War Rubin Uzi Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 111 www.besacenter.org THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 111 Israel’s Air and Missile Defense During the 2014 Gaza War Uzi Rubin Israel’s Air and Missile Defense During the 2014 Gaza War Uzi Rubin © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel. 972-3-5318959 Fax. 972-3-5359195 [email protected] http://www.besacenter.org ISSN 1565-9895 February 2015 Cover picture: Flickr/Israel Defense Forces The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies advances a realist, conservative, and Zionist agenda in the search for security and peace for Israel. It was named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace lay the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. The center conducts policy-relevant research on strategic subjects, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and Middle East regional affairs. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author’s views or conclusions. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official and general publics.
    [Show full text]