DOCSLIB.ORG

Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited Revisited Marriage www.futureofchildren.org The Future of Children Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited VOLUME 25 NUMBER 2 FALL 2015 3 Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited: Introducing the Issue 11 Why Marriage Matters for Child Wellbeing 29 The Evolving Role of Marriage: 1950 –2010 51 Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing Volume 25 Volume 67 Marriage and Family: LGBT Individuals and Same-Sex Couples 89 The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns 111 One Nation, Divided: Culture, Civic Institutions, and the Marriage Divide 129 The Family Is Here to Stay — or Not Number 2 155 Lessons Learned from Non-Marriage Experiments Fall 2015 A COLLABORATION OF THE WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT A COLLABORATION OF THE WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION The Future of Children promotes effective policies and programs for children by providing timely, objective information based on the best available research. Senior Editorial Staff Journal Staff Sara McLanahan Kris McDonald Editor-in-Chief Associate Editor Princeton University Princeton University Director, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, and William S. Tod Jon Wallace Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Managing Editor Princeton University Janet M. Currie Senior Editor Lisa Markman-Pithers Princeton University Outreach Director Director, Center for Health and Wellbeing; Princeton University Chair, Department of Economics; Associate Director, Education and Henry Putnam Professor of Economics Research Section and Public Affairs Stephanie Cencula Ron Haskins Outreach Coordinator Senior Editor Brookings Institution Brookings Institution Regina Leidy Senior Fellow, Cabot Family Chair, and Communications Coordinator Co-Director, Center on Children and Families Princeton University Cecilia Elena Rouse Tracy Merone Senior Editor Administrator Princeton University Princeton University Dean, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Katzman-Ernst Professor in the Economics of Education, and Professor of Economics and Public Affairs The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of the Isabel Sawhill Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University or the Brookings Institution. Senior Editor Brookings Institution Copyright © 2015 by The Trustees of Princeton University Senior Fellow This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0. Articles may be reproduced with proper attribution: “From The Future of Children, The Future of Children would like to thank the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation in a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at the Administration for Children and Families for its generous support. The views expressed in Princeton University and the Brookings Institution.” this issue are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions of ACF. To purchase a print copy, download free electronic copies, or sign up for our e-newsletter, ISSN: 1054-8289 go to our website, www.futureofchildren.org. If you would like additional information about ISBN: 978-0-9857863-4-2 the journal, please send questions to [email protected]. VOLUME 25 NUMBER 2 FALL 2015 Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited 3 Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited: Introducing the Issue by Sara McLanahan and Isabel Sawhill 11 Why Marriage Matters for Child Wellbeing by David C. Ribar 29 The Evolving Role of Marriage: 1950 –2010 by Shelly Lundberg and Robert A. Pollak 51 Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing by Wendy D. Manning 67 Marriage and Family: LGBT Individuals and Same-Sex Couples by Gary J. Gates 89 The Growing Racial and Ethnic Divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns by R. Kelly Raley, Megan M. Sweeney, and Danielle Wondra 111 One Nation, Divided: Culture, Civic Institutions, and the Marriage Divide by W. Bradford Wilcox, Nicholas H. Wolfinger, and Charles E. Stokes 129 The Family Is Here to Stay— or Not by Ron Haskins 155 Lessons Learned from Non -Marriage Experiments by Daniel Schneider www.futureofchildren.org Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited: Introducing the Issue Marriage and Child Wellbeing Revisited: Introducing the Issue Sara McLanahan and Isabel Sawhill arriage is on the decline. instability undermines parents’ investments Men and women of the in their children, affecting the children’s youngest generation cognitive and social-emotional development are either marrying in in ways that constrain their life chances.2 their late twenties or not Mmarrying at all. Childbearing has also been Previous Research postponed, but not as much as marriage. With these trends as background, the The result is that a growing proportion of Future of Children first addressed the issue children are born to unmarried parents— of marriage and its effects on children a roughly 40 percent in recent years, and decade ago, in 2005. Then, we found that over 50 percent for children born to women children raised in single-parent families under 30. didn’t fare as well as those raised in two- parent families, that the rise of single Many unmarried parents are cohabiting parenthood was contributing to higher when their child is born. Indeed, almost all rates of poverty, and that children raised of the increase in nonmarital childbearing by same-sex couples fared no better or during the past two decades has occurred worse than those raised by opposite-sex to cohabiting rather than single mothers.1 parents (this last conclusion was tentative, But cohabiting unions are very unstable, given the lack of good research at the leading us to use the term “fragile families” time). The issue went on to consider a to describe them. About half of couples variety of ways that government policy who are cohabiting at their child’s birth will might encourage marriage or enhance the split by the time the child is five. Many of quality of parents’ relationships. Marriage these young parents will go on to form new education programs promoted and funded relationships and to have additional children by the Bush administration received special with new partners. The consequences of attention, although at the time there were this instability for children are not good. no findings from strong evaluations to Research increasingly shows that family tell us what those programs might have www.futureofchildren.org Sara McLanahan is the editor-in-chief of the Future of Children, as well as the director of the Center for Research on Child Wellbeing and the William S. Tod Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs at Princeton University. Isabel Sawhill is a senior editor of the Future of Children, as well as a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. VOL. 25 / NO. 2 / FALL 2015 3 Sara McLanahan and Isabel Sawhill accomplished. We also reviewed financial of cohabiting parents with children, for incentives in tax and benefit programs example, has increased dramatically during and found that they create some penalties the past two decades. How should we for marriage, although the effect of those view these partnerships? Are they just penalties on behavior and the feasibility of marriages without a piece of paper, or are altering them, given the budgetary costs, they something else? We know that such were unclear. After reviewing the evidence, relationships are, on average, less stable or the editors concluded that marriage was durable than marriage, and they seem to important for child wellbeing but that entail less commitment. But cohabitation can policymakers shouldn’t focus on marriage be short- or long-term; it can be a precursor to the exclusion of other strategies aimed at to marriage or to single motherhood; it the same goal, such as alleviating poverty, can involve two biological parents, or reducing unintended pregnancies, and only one parent plus an unrelated male or encouraging fathers’ monetary and emotional female partner; and it can involve a second involvement. parent who is either very engaged or very uninvolved in the child’s life. Repartnering A Decade of Change and serial cohabitation are common, often Although many of the findings and leading to half siblings and creating a shifting conclusions of the earlier issue remain set of members in a child’s household. relevant, the past decade has produced a number of developments and research In addition to an increase in cohabiting findings that made it worthwhile to revisit parent families, we’ve seen much greater marriage and child wellbeing. acceptance of families formed by same- sex partners. The data on married same- Whereas most scholars now agree that sex couples and their children are still not children raised by two biological parents in robust. Since marriage was prohibited among a stable marriage do better than children such couples until very recently, most of in other family forms across a wide range what we know about how children fare in gay of outcomes, there is less consensus about or lesbian households is based on children why. Is it the quality of parenting? Is it the born to heterosexual couples who later split availability of additional resources (time and up. This fact makes it difficult to directly money)? Or is it just that married parents compare children raised in stable, same-sex have different attributes than those who households with children raised in stable aren’t married? Thus a major theme we heterosexual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Marriage and Families Across Time and Place M01 ESHL8740 12 SE C01.QXD 9/14/09 5:28 PM Page 3
    M01_ESHL8740_12_SE_C01.QXD 9/14/09 5:28 PM Page 2 part I Understanding Marriage and Families across Time and Place M01_ESHL8740_12_SE_C01.QXD 9/14/09 5:28 PM Page 3 chapter 1 Defining the Family Institutional and Disciplinary Concerns Case Example What Is a Family? Is There a Universal Standard? What Do Contemporary Families Look Like? Ross and Janet have been married more than forty-seven years. They have two chil- dren, a daughter-in-law and a son-in-law, and four grandsons. Few would dispute the notion that all these members are part of a common kinship group because all are related by birth or marriage. The three couples involved each got engaged, made a public announcement of their wedding plans, got married in a religious ceremony, and moved to separate residences, and each female accepted her husband’s last name. Few would question that each of these groups of couples with their children constitutes a family, although a question remains as to whether they are a single family unit or multiple family units. More difficult to classify are the families of Vernon and Jeanne and their chil- dren. Married for more than twenty years, Vernon and Jeanne had four children whom have had vastly different family experiences. Their oldest son, John, moved into a new addition to his parents’ house when he was married and continues to live there with his wife and three children. Are John, his wife, and his children a separate family unit, or are they part of Vernon and Jeanne’s family unit? The second child, Sonia, pursued a career in marketing and never married.
    [Show full text]
  • Placement of Children with Relatives
    STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship Terminology
    Fox (Mesquakie) Kinship Terminology IVES GODDARD Smithsonian Institution A. Basic Terms (Conventional List) The Fox kinship system has drawn a fair amount of attention in the ethno­ graphic literature (Tax 1937; Michelson 1932, 1938; Callender 1962, 1978; Lounsbury 1964). The terminology that has been discussed consists of the basic terms listed in §A, with a few minor inconsistencies and errors in some cases. Basically these are the terms given by Callender (1962:113-121), who credits the terminology given by Tax (1937:247-254) as phonemicized by CF. Hockett. Callender's terms include, however, silent corrections of Tax from Michelson (1938) or fieldwork, or both. (The abbreviations are those used in Table l.)1 Consanguines Grandparents' Generation (1) nemesoha 'my grandfather' (GrFa) (2) no hkomesa 'my grandmother' (GrMo) Parents' Generation (3) nosa 'my father' (Fa) (4) nekya 'my mother' (Mo [if Ego's female parent]) (5) nesekwisa 'my father's sister' (Pat-Aunt) (6) nes'iseha 'my mother's brother' (Mat-Unc) (7) nekiha 'my mother's sister' (Mo [if not Ego's female parent]) 'Other abbreviations used are: AI = animate intransitive; AI + O = tran- sitivized AI; Ch = child; ex. = example; incl. = inclusive; m = male; obv. = obviative; pi. = plural; prox. = proximate; sg. = singular; TA = transitive ani­ mate; TI-0 = objectless transitive inanimate; voc. = vocative; w = female; Wi = wife. Some citations from unpublished editions of texts by Alfred Kiyana use abbreviations: B = Buffalo; O = Owl (for these, see Goddard 1990a:340). 244 FOX
    [Show full text]
  • Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with At-Risk Families
    ISSUE BRIEF January 2013 Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) is a family-centered What’s Inside: treatment approach proven effective for abused and at-risk children ages 2 to 8 and their caregivers—birth parents, • What makes PCIT unique? adoptive parents, or foster or kin caregivers. During PCIT, • Key components therapists coach parents while they interact with their • Effectiveness of PCIT children, teaching caregivers strategies that will promote • Implementation in a child positive behaviors in children who have disruptive or welfare setting externalizing behavior problems. Research has shown that, as a result of PCIT, parents learn more effective parenting • Resources for further information techniques, the behavior problems of children decrease, and the quality of the parent-child relationship improves. Child Welfare Information Gateway Children’s Bureau/ACYF 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20024 800.394.3366 Email: [email protected] Use your smartphone to https:\\www.childwelfare.gov access this issue brief online. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families https://www.childwelfare.gov This issue brief is intended to build a better of the model, which have been experienced understanding of the characteristics and by families along the child welfare continuum, benefits of PCIT. It was written primarily to such as at-risk families and those with help child welfare caseworkers and other confirmed reports of maltreatment or neglect, professionals who work with at-risk families are described below. make more informed decisions about when to refer parents and caregivers, along with their children, to PCIT programs.
    [Show full text]
  • 14-436 Statement of Adult Acting in Loco Parentis (As a Parent)
    TANF/SFA FOR CHILDREN LIVING WITH UNRELATED ADULTS Statement of Adult Acting in Loco Parentis (as a Parent) Fill out this form if you are caring for a needy child you are not related to and you do not have court-ordered custody or guardianship of the child. SECTION 1. AGENCY INFORMATION (COMPLETED BY AGENCY STAFF ONLY) 1. COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICE (CSO) 2. CASE MANAGER NAME 3. UNRELATED ADULT’S CLIENT ID NUMBER SECTION 2. INFORMATION ON ADULT CARING FOR THE CHILD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) 4. LAST NAME 5. FIRST NAME 6. MIDDLE NAME 7. PHONE NUMBER (INCLUDE AREA CODE) ( ) 8. CURRENT ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, AND ZIP CODE) 9. PREVIOUS ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, AND ZIP CODE) SECTION 3. INFORMATION ON THE CHILD’S PARENTS (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) 10. NAME OF CHILD’S MOTHER 11. MOTHER’S PHONE NUMBER 12. MOTHER’S CURRENT OR LAST KNOWN ADDRESS ( ) 13. NAME OF CHILD’S FATHER 14. FATHER’S PHONE NUMBER 15. FATHER’S CURRENT OR LAST KNOWN ADDRESS ( ) SECTION 4. INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) 16. Do you have permission from the child’s parents to care for the child? Yes No If yes, is it in w riting? Yes No 17. EXPLAIN HOW THE CHILD CAME TO LIVE WITH YOU 18. How long do you expect the child to live w ith you? 19. Are you planning to seek court-ordered custody or guardianship? Yes No SECTION 5. INFORMATION ABOUT THE CARE AND CONTROL OF A CHILD "In loco parentis" means in the place of a parent or instead of a We consider you as acting in loco parentis when: parent.
    [Show full text]
  • Children and Stepfamilies: a Snapshot
    Children and Stepfamilies: A Snapshot by Chandler Arnold November, 1998 A Substantial Percentage of Children live in Stepfamilies. · More than half the Americans alive today have been, are now, or eventually will be in one or more stepfamily situations during their lives. One third of all children alive today are expected to become stepchildren before they reach the age of 18. One out of every three Americans is currently a stepparent, stepchild, or stepsibling or some other member of a stepfamily. · Between 1980 and 1990 the number of stepfamilies increased 36%, to 5.3 million. · By the year 2000 more Americans will be living in stepfamilies than in nuclear families. · African-American children are most likely to live in stepfamilies. 32.3% of black children under 18 residing in married-couple families do so with a stepparent, compared with 16.1% of Hispanic origin children and 14.6% of white children. Stepfamily Situations in America Of the custodial parents who have chosen to remarry we know the following: · 86% of stepfamilies are composed of biological mother and stepfather. · The dramatic upsurge of people living in stepfamilies is largely do to America’s increasing divorce rate, which has grown by 70%. As two-thirds of the divorced and widowed choose to remarry the number of stepfamilies is growing proportionately. The other major factor influencing the number of people living in stepfamilies is the fact that a substantial number of children entering stepfamilies are born out of wedlock. A third of children entering stepfamilies do so after birth to an unmarried mother, a situation that is four times more common in black stepfamilies than white stepfamilies.1 Finally, the mode of entry into stepfamilies also varies drastically with the age of children: while a majority of preschoolers entering stepfamilies do so after nonmarital birth, the least frequent mode of entry for these young children (16%) fits the traditional conception of a stepfamily as formed 1 This calculation includes children born to cohabiting (but unmarried) parents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Steps to Adoption We Hope This Information Will Make Your Experience a Little Easier
    HOW LONG DOES ADOPTING TAKE? Adopting a child always requires a waiting period of some “Thank you for asking duration. When home studies are presented, the custodial agency for the child must assess the strengths of all the about adoption!” interested families and decide which family can best meet the needs of a specific child. The time frame is not predictable and it can be frustrating for families who are ready and prepared to adopt. A prospective parent who has abilities/strengths to meet the needs for a waiting child with special needs may wait 9 months or more. If you have more questions WHAT KIND OF CHILDREN ARE WAITING? or need additional information: Most of the children who wait are: Please call: • Age six years old or older and have been in foster 1-800-DO-ADOPT care for eighteen (18) months or longer; OR • Have a close relationship with brothers or sisters your local department of social services and are placed with their sibling(s); www.dss.virginia.gov/localagency • Are a minority, based on racial, multi-racial, or ethnic heritage; • Have physical, mental, or emotional condition; or • Have a hereditary tendency, congenital problem, or birth injury leading to substantial risk of future disability. HOW MUCH DOES IT COST TO ADOPT? There is no charge when you adopt a special needs child in the custody of a local department of social services. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE? Adoption assistance, also called subsidized adoption is a means of providing a money payment and/or services to adoptive parent(s) on behalf of a child with special Facebook: Virginia Adopts needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage and the Family in the United States: Resources for Society a Review of Research on the Benefits Generated from Families Rooted in Marriage
    Marriage and the Family in the United States: Resources for Society A review of research on the benefits generated from families rooted in marriage. 2012 Prepared by Theresa Notare, PhD Assistant Director, Natural Family Planning Program and H. Richard McCord, EdD Former Executive Director Secretariat of Laity, Marriage, Family Life and Youth, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Washington, DC United States of America Marriage and the Family in the United States: Resources for Society A review of research on the benefits generated from families rooted in marriage. Contents Introduction .………………………..…………………………...… p. 1 Psychological Development and Emotional Well-Being .………… p. 3 Physical Health of Family Members ………….…………………. p. 11 Economic Benefits ......……………………….………………….. p. 16 Conclusion—Marriage is a Good for Society .….……………….. p. 23 The Family in the United States: A Resource for Society Review of the Research Introduction The family generates important social virtues and many benefits for individuals and society. The following is a review of the research that shows the married family’s positive influence on individual and societal well-being. Also briefly discussed are some of the negative outcomes generated by non-married families. Research on marriage and the family in the United States demonstrates that many individual and social benefits are rooted in the permanent union of one man with one woman.1 Studies consistently show what Catholic Church teaching has always affirmed, namely, that The well-being of the individual
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded Medical Leave Under the Families First Coronavirus
    Expanded Medical Leave Under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act Recognizes that it takes a Village to Raise a Child By: Alison Smith, Partner in Kelley Kronenberg’s Fort Lauderdale office. By now, most employers are familiar with, and have had to implement, aspects of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”), (i.e., paid and/or family medical leave). Pursuant to the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act (“EFMLA”), which as the name suggests, expands the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), most employers with fewer than 500 employees are required to provide any employee who has worked for their company for at least 30 days, up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave. The first 10 days are unpaid (unless the employee requests paid sick leave or uses accrued leave time), and the remainder is paid for up to another 10 weeks (assuming the employee has not already used or exhausted FMLA leave for other qualifying reasons). Pay provided must be no less than two-thirds of the employee's regular rate, capped at $200 per day and $10,000 in the aggregate. This leave is specifically permitted so that the employee (who must not be able to work or telecommute), can provide child care for a son or daughter under the age of 18 if that child’s school or place of care is closed, or the childcare provider is unavailable due to a public health emergency (or, if the child is 18 years of age or older, has a mental or physical disability and is incapable of self-care because of that disability).
    [Show full text]
  • Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean
    Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean Prepared by: Dr. Godfrey St. Bernard The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago Phone Contacts: 1-868-776-4768 (mobile) 1-868-640-5584 (home) 1-868-662-2002 ext. 2148 (office) E-mail Contacts: [email protected] [email protected] Prepared for: United Nations Division of Social Policy and Development Department of Economic and Social Affairs Program on the Family Date: May 23, 2003 Introduction Though an elusive concept, the family is a social institution that binds two or more individuals into a primary group to the extent that the members of the group are related to one another on the basis of blood relationships, affinity or some other symbolic network of association. It is an essential pillar upon which all societies are built and with such a character, has transcended time and space. Often times, it has been mooted that the most constant thing in life is change, a phenomenon that is characteristic of the family irrespective of space and time. The dynamic character of family structures, - including members’ status, their associated roles, functions and interpersonal relationships, - has an important impact on a host of other social institutional spheres, prospective economic fortunes, political decision-making and sustainable futures. Assuming that the ultimate goal of all societies is to enhance quality of life, the family constitutes a worthy unit of inquiry. Whether from a social or economic standpoint, the family is critical in stimulating the well being of a people. The family has been and will continue to be subjected to myriad social, economic, cultural, political and environmental forces that shape it.
    [Show full text]
  • "Family Complexity and Kinship" In
    Family Complexity and Kinship∗ ELIZABETH THOMSON Abstract Increases in parental cohabitation, separation or divorce, and re-partnering or remar- riage have generated an increase in the complexity of family and kinship ties. As a result, many scholars claim that family and kinship have become voluntary, with rights and obligations to be negotiated in the same way as those between friends and neighbors. This essay briefly reviews the demographic trends that have produced complex families and kin, and their projections into the future. It argues that kinship structures arising from stable nuclear family and kin networks provide a template for the organization of more complex family ties. Although a considerable degree of voluntariness can be found in ties among complex families and kin, rights and obligations remain structured in terms of blood and marriage, and are also strongly influenced by periods of coresidence. Guidelines do exist for relationships in complex families and kinship networks, and they can be used to further institutional arrange- ments that fit the circumstances of increasingly diverse types of families andkin. During the twentieth century, and particularly since mid-century, intimate partnerships have undergone dramatic changes. Marriage is no longer required for couples to live together and have children. Couples have freedom to end their relationship, even when they have become parents. These trends are further along in some societies than others, but they are emerging in virtually all affluent “western” societies (Andersson, Thomson, & Duntava, forthcoming). Because separation and divorce usually occur during the childrear- ing years, the trend is toward an increasing pool of single parents who return to the partnership market.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards of Practice for Pediatric Palliative Care Professional Development and Resource Series
    STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE SERIES STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE SERIES STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE SERIES ii Table of Contents 1 / Introduction 1 2 / What is Pediatric Palliative and Hospice Care? 3 3 / How Does Pediatric Palliative Care and Hospice Differ from Palliative Care and Hospice for Adults? 5 4 / Identifying Children for Pediatric Palliative Care and Hospice 7 5 / Clinical Excellence and Safety (PPC CES) 11 6 / Compliance with Laws and Regulations (CLR) 15 7 / Ethical Behavior and Consumer Rights (PPC EBR) 19 8 / Inclusion and Access (PPC IA) 25 9 / Organizational Excellence (PPC OE) 29 10 / Patient and Family-Centered Care (PPC PFC) 33 11 / Performance Measurement (PPC PM) 39 12 / Stewardship and Accountability (PPC SA) 43 13 / Workforce Excellence (PPC WE) 45 iii STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE SERIES 1 / Introduction PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE SERIES 1 Introduction / The palliative care and/or hospice interdisciplinary team provides family centered care that includes the child and family as one unit of care, respecting individual preferences, values, and cultural beliefs, with the child and family active in decision making regarding goals and plan of care. The family and caregivers have the right to be informed about the illness, potential treatments and outcomes. The family
    [Show full text]