DOCSLIB.ORG

Crisis, Revolution, and Russian Jews Jonathan Frankel Index More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crisis, Revolution, and Russian Jews Jonathan Frankel Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51364-7 - Crisis, Revolution, and Russian Jews Jonathan Frankel Index More information Index Aaronsohn, Aharon, 143 Statutes of, 35, 39, 42, 50, 53 Abrahami, Zvi, 160 Alsace, 284 Abramovich, Rafael, 11, 216, 222, Altmann, Alexander, 293–94 230 Amalgamated Clothing Workers of Abuya, Elisha ben, 275 America, 69, 172, 221 Adler, Cyrus, 307 American Communist Party, 221 Agnon, S.Y., 188 American Jewish Committee, 3, 5, 69, 143, Agudat Israel, 20, 232 224, 224n21, 231–33 Ahad Haam, 17, 66, 108–9, 114, 127–29, American Jewish Conference, 228, 231–33, 146, 179, 193–94, 201n48, 247–48, 233n59, 234 251, 253, 266–67 American Jewish Congress, 138, 146, 224, Al parashat drakhim (“At the 226, 232 Crossroads”), 107 American Jewish Joint Distribution An-sky on, 97 Committee, 5, 140–41, 234 and Kishinev pogrom, 263 American Jewish Relief Committee for Aharoni, Arye, 73n4 Sufferers from the War, 141n15 Aharonovich, Yosef, 187n6, 190 American Labor Party, 220 Alexander II, 1, 285, 298, 308–9 Amerikanstvo, 19, 58 Alexander III, 60, 276 Am Olam, 19, 20n10, 22, 283 Alexandria, 28, 49 Amsterdam, Avrom, 173 aliya, 17 Anderson, Benedict, 35n12 Second, 10, 70, 128, 173–74, 183–88, Anglo-French free trade treaty, 38 189n12, 191n19, 193–94, 202, 204, Anglo-Jewish Association, 3, 30, 139, 206, 212, 214, 214n79, 215, 220 306 Third, 71, 153, 174 An-sky, S. (Shloyme Zanvil Rappoport), See also Yishuv 4, 103, 116, 116n48, 278, Alkalai, Yehuda, 29 Chapter 4 al-Karmil, 199 In Shtrom, 11, 72, 73, 75–88, 91–2, Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums, 33, 94–5, 97 35, 46–8, 50–3 Di shvue (The Oath), 82 Alliance Israelite´ Universelle, 35–53, 306, Tsum Bund (To the Bund), 82 307 anti-Semitism, 15, 58–60, 150n46, 165, and Russian Jewry, 21–2 166, 168, 229, 234, 244, 265, 269, and Zionism, 143 279 establishment of, 2, 5, 17–18, 30, 37, anti-Zionism, 65, 138, 149, 159, 186 291 Socialist/Left, 4, 160, 162–64, 173, 176, Manifesto – “Appel a` tous les Israelites,”´ 179, 228 35, 36n17, 40, 42, 53 Soviet, 167–68, 170–71, 176–77 Statement of Goals (Expose´), 35–6, 40, Soviet Anti-Zionist Committee (ASKO), 42–4, 51, 53 166 311 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51364-7 - Crisis, Revolution, and Russian Jews Jonathan Frankel Index More information 312 Index Arab-Jewish relations/conflict, 10, 98, 161, Berdyczewski, Micha Yosef, 105, 187, 163, 178, 184–89, 189n12, 190, 188 190n16, 191–95, 195n30, 196–204, Berlin, 30, 177, 214, 240, 253, 256, 268, 208n64, 209–10, 212, 213n75, 268n117, 273, 279, 285–86, 288, 228–30 297, 300 and Arab nationalism, 176–77, 198–99 Congress of, 31 and Communists, 176–77 Berger, Yitzhak, 113 Arbeter Tsaytung, 59 Berkowitz, Y. D., 73n4 Archives Israelites´ , 33, 37, 39, 45, 51 Berlin, Naftali Zvi, 21 Aronson, Grigorii, 222 Bern, 82 Assembly of Jewish Notables, 287–88 BetAriffarm,187n6 assimilation, 16, 105, 159, 196, 246–47, Biale, David, 294 Chapter 11 Bialik, N., 96, 114, 119n54, 263 of Western Jewry, 17, 24–5, 249, 269 “Masa Nemirov,” 96n64, 119n54 Astruc, Aristide, 38 “In the City of Slaughter” (“Ba’ir Austria, 33, 134, 153, 267, 285 haharega”), 96, 96n64, 114–15, Reichsrat of, 70, 262n90 115n41 Austria-Hungary/Habsburg Empire, 36, Biltmore program, 232 39, 60, 125, 146, 149, 158, 262n90, Bilu, 19, 23 285, 302 Birobijan, 169, 230 autoemancipationism, 18–19, 30, 58 Bismarck, Otto von, 38 autonomism, 4, 62, 66, 108, 173, 217–18, treaty of 1871, 270 239–40, 243, 246, 256–57, 261, Bittelman, Alexander, 220, 227 265–69, 275, 277, 280 Black Hundred organizations, 60, 63 Axelrod, P., 59 Bloch, Simon, 37–8, 38n25, 39–40, 51–2, 52n74 Bakon, Yitzhak, 98–9, 108, 113n35, 116, Blood Libel, 5 116n50, 121n57, 128 Bloody Sunday (9 January 1905), 61 Balfour Declaration, 132, 143, 146–49, Blumenfeld, Efraim, 196 163, 177, 226 Board of Delegates of American Israelites, Baltic states, 269 43–4, 44n47 Baltimore, 47, 53 Board of Deputies, 43, 45, 46, 306–7 Bar-Giora, 70, 184, 197–99, 208n64 Bobruisk, 116n50, 117 Bar-Kochba, 205, 208n64, 214 Boevoi otriad (kamf organizatsiye), 61, 70, Baron, Salo Wittmayer, 240, 261, 295 79 Bartal, Israel, 306, 307 Bolsheviks (Bolshevik regime, party), Bartanovsky, Zvi, 188 11–12, 136, 149, 150n46, 151, Bar Yohai, Shimon, 205 152n52, 154, 163, 166, 169–72, 175, Bar Yosef, Hamutal, 99 212, 226, 235, 269–70 Baskin, Joseph, 221 Boreisha, Menachem, 231 Beduin, 190, 197, 213n75 Borne,¨ L., 284, 291 Beilis trial, 153 Borokhov, Ber, 113, 113n36, 119–20, 164, Belgium, 35 175, 195–97, 215 Belinsky, Vissarion, 102 “Our Platform,” 175, 196 Ben-Ammi (M. I. Rabinovich), 263 Borokhovtsy, 195 Belorussia, 217, 242 Bramson, Leon, 260 Belostok, 107–9, 129, 159 Brandeis, Louis Dembitz, 145, 223 Ben-Chananja, 39 Brenner, Yosef Haim, 4, 89, 89n39, 173, Ben-Gurion (Grin), David, 10, 170, 174, 187–88, 193, 202, 204, 206, 208–10, 176, 179, 183, 195, 197, 213, 211n70, 212, 214, Chapter 5 213n75, 220 A kleyner felieton, 121n57 “From Petah Tikva to Sejera,” 212 Baemek akhor (“In the Valley of Ben-Hillel Ha-Cohen, Mordechai, 107n22 Trouble”), 109 Benisch, Abraham, 30, 38n24, 44–6, 50 Bahoref (“In the Winter”), 100, 104–5, Ben-Zakai, Yohanan, 248 105n14, 106, 109 Ben Zvi, Yitshak, 195–98, 207, 212–13 Ben mayim le-mayim (“Between the Berdichev, 221 Waters”), 208 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51364-7 - Crisis, Revolution, and Russian Jews Jonathan Frankel Index More information Index 313 Briyah ’aluvah (“A Miserable Being”), Central Committee for the Relief of Jews 106 Suffering Through the War, 141n15 Der kampf, 107, 173 Central Powers, 134, 138, 144 Hu amar lah (“He Told Her”), 114, Cesarani, David, 32 115n41 Chaikovsky, Nikolai, 116, 116n49 Mialef ad mem (“From A. to M.”), 117, Chanin, Nokhem, 226, 234 124 Charney, David, 220 Mi’ever legevulin (“Beyond the Limits”), Cheka, 270 124 Cherny peredel, 59 Mikhtavim lerusiyah (“Letters to Chernyshevsky, N., 243, 251 Russia”), 118 China, 11 Min hameizar (“From the Narrows”), Chinese Communist Party, 132 117 Chorin, Aaron, 289–90 Misaviv lanekuda (“Circling the Point”), Churchill, Winston, 10, 131, 152 100, 117, 120, 122 Cincinnati, 44 Mizvah, 105 Civil War in Russia, 1, 5, 12, 134–35, Shana ahat (“A Single Year”), 117 136–37, 153, 166–67, 221, 228, 241, Brezhnev period, 171, 177 253, 257, 268–69, 273 Brinker, Menachem, 99, 102, 129 anti-Bolshevik/White forces, 134–38, British Conjoint Committee, 143 149–50, 150n46, 270 British White Papers of 1939, 233 Clayton, Gilbert, 152n52 Brody, 23 Clermont-Tonnerre statement, 287 Brutzkus, Julius, 260 Cohen, Borekh Mordkhe (Virgily), 107, Buber, Martin, 137, 214 107n22, 220 Buchanan, George, 137 Cohen, Gershon, 303–4 Buckle, H. T., 243, 251, 253 Cohen, Yaakov, 197 Bund, 4–6, 10–11, 88n34, 120, 148–50, Cohn, Albert, 44, 49 157, 159–60, 217, 246, 250, 256, Comintern, 150, 153, 168, 171, 174–76, 274, 278 227 and Russian Revolution of 1905–07, 57, Second Congress of, 167 61–9, 264 Seventh Congress of, 177 and Zionism, 160, 163–66, 175–76, Communists, 11, 140–53, 168–77, 215, 228–29 222, 228–29, 232, 234 Ans-ky, 76–84, 84n29, 85–8, 93–7 bloc, 171, 177 Bolshevism against, 167–74, 216 Comte, A., 243, 251 Brenner, 107, 107n22, 108–9, 109n27, Consistoire Central, 26, 30, 39, 46 114, 116n50, 117, 118n53, 121, 123, Constantinople, 23, 28 128–29, 173 Cooper, Anthony Ashley, seventh earl of Central Federation of Bundist Shaftesbury, 22, 28–9 Organizations in America, 63 Cossacks, 85–6, 89, 119n54, 135, 139, Galician, 69 198, 219 Fourth Congress, 108, 108n25, 159 Cremieux,´ Adolphe, 25–6, 30–1, 35, 38, Friends of, 63 42, 45, 49, 291, 306 ideology, 6n3, 7n4, 169, 217 Crimea, 169 in Poland, 226, 233, 250n37 Crimean War, 34 in the U.S., 68–9, 172, Chapter 9 Kombund (the Communist Bund), Damascus, 24–5, 28, 28n25, 49 168 Christian population of, 38 Damascus Affair/Case, 5, 15, 17–18, 23–8, Cahan, Abe, 172, 227 30, 57, 137, 289, 291 Cahen, Isidore, 38, 51 See also Jewry of Damascus Cahen, Samuel, 37 Debs, Eugene Victor, 222 capitalism, 196, 290 Derenbourg, Joseph Naftali, 289 print-capitalism, 35n12 Der fraynd, 72–3 Carlyle, Thomas, 126n74 Der Jude, 26 Carr, E. H., 9 Der Orient, 30, 33 Carvallo, Jules, 38, 46 Der veg, 73 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51364-7 - Crisis, Revolution, and Russian Jews Jonathan Frankel Index More information 314 Index Der veker, 228, 230, 232, 234 Educatore Israelita´ , 41 Der yidishe kemfer, 213n75 Egypt, 28, 31, 136, 270 Deutscher, Isaac, 12 Ein Ganim, 184 Dewey, Thomas, 220 Einhorn, David, 47, 50, 50n67, 53, 222, Diaspora/Exile/Galut, 15, 90, 97, 108, 234 125, 175, 179, 191, 201–2, 202n50, Eisner, Kurt, 151 204–6, 206n58, 207–8, 212, 235, eksterny, 103, 196, 254 240, 256–57, 261–62, 266, 266n108, Eliasberg, Mordekhay, 21 275, 281, 290 emancipation, 2–3, 16, 18, 30, 38, 46, kibbutz hagaluyot (“ingathering of the 57–8, 60–1, 153, 245, 264, 267–68, exiles”), 113, 178–79 274, 281, 286–87, 291, 307 nationalism, 172, 214, 235, 239, 280 Endelman, Todd, 296 shlilat hagalut (“negation of the exile”), Enlightenment, 244, 254, 274, 282–85, 179, 255, 280 288–89, 307 Di fraye arbiter velt, 121n57 Entente Powers, 144 Dinur (Dinaburg), Ben Zion, 17–18, 21, Epstein, A., 94n54 247, 254n56, 278, 280–81, 286, Epstein, Shakhne, 222, 224–25 290–91, 305 Epstein, Yitshak, 193 Be-mifneh ha-dorot, 17, 280 Erlich, Henryk, 220, 227, 250n37 Disraeli, Benjamin, 190n16 Eshkol, Levi, 183 Di varhayt, 73 Etkes, Emanuel, 297 Dizengoff, Meir, 263 Ettinger, Shmuel, 33, 280–81, 286–87, Djemal, Pasha, 136, 138, 142
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catholicism HDT WHAT? INDEX
    ST. BERNARD’S PARISH OF CONCORD “I know histhry isn’t thrue, Hinnissy, because it ain’t like what I see ivry day in Halsted Street. If any wan comes along with a histhry iv Greece or Rome that’ll show me th’ people fightin’, gettin’ dhrunk, makin’ love, gettin’ married, owin’ th’ grocery man an’ bein’ without hard coal, I’ll believe they was a Greece or Rome, but not befur.” — Dunne, Finley Peter, OBSERVATIONS BY MR. DOOLEY, New York, 1902 “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Roman Catholicism HDT WHAT? INDEX ROMAN CATHOLICISM CATHOLICISM 312 CE October 28: Our favorite pushy people, the Romans, met at Augusta Taurinorum in northern Italy some even pushier people, to wit the legions of Constantine the Great — and the outcome of this would be an entirely new Pax Romana. While about to do battle against the legions of Maxentius which outnumbered his own 4 to 1, Constantine had a vision in which he saw a compound symbol (chi and rho , the beginning of ) appearing in the cloudy heavens,1 and heard “Under this sign you will be victorious.” He placed the symbol on his helmet and on the shields of his soldiers, and Maxentius’s horse threw him into the water at Milvan (Mulvian) Bridge and the Roman commander was drowned (what more could one ask God for?). 1. In a timeframe in which no real distinction was being made between astrology and astronomy, you will note, seeing a sign like this in the heavens may be classed as astronomy quite as readily as it may be classed as astrology.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Europe Abroad: Exploring Actor-Networks in Transnational Movements and Migration History, the Case of the Bund
    IRSH 57 (2012), pp. 229–255 doi:10.1017/S0020859012000211 r 2012 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Eastern Europe Abroad: Exploring Actor-Networks in Transnational Movements and Migration History, The Case of the Bund F RANK W OLFF IMIS, Osnabru¨ck University E-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY: The ‘‘transnational turn’’ is one of the most discussed topics in historio- graphy, yet it has inspired more theoretical tension than empirically saturated studies. This article combines both aspects by examining the transnational network formation of one of the most important social movements in late imperial Russia, the Jewish Labour Bund. It furthermore introduces into historiography one of the most fruitful theories in recent social sciences, ‘‘actor-network theory’’. This opens the view on the steady recreation of a social movement and reveals how closely the history of the Bund in eastern Europe was interwoven with large socialist organizations in the New World. Based on a large number of sources, this contribution to migration and movement history captures the creation and the limits of global socialist networks. As a result, it shows that globalization did not only create economic or political net- works but that it impacted the everyday lives of authors and journalists as well as those of tailors and shoemakers. Repeatedly, the Russian Revolutions have attracted the world’s interest. But the emergence of this revolutionary movement was by no means only a Russian matter. Even before Red October, it had a great impact on movements and societies around the globe. Moreover, the Russian movement itself relied on actors who lived and worked far from Russian itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelicals, Jews, and Anti-Catholicism in Britain, C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 10.14324/111.444.jhs.2016v47.009 provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Evangelicals, Jews, and anti-Catholicism in Britain, c. 1840–1900 david feldman Jews in the nineteenth century became entangled in a series of affairs. The term “affair” did not connote merely an injustice but the process through which a perceived wrong became the object of mobilized public opinion. Most famously, for the Jews, there were the Damascus, Mortara, and Dreyfus affairs. All three placed Jews in conflict with the Catholic Church. The emergence of these affairs was one facet of a new political culture constituted by the reformed franchise, by petitions, public meetings, and a press which together constituted “public opinion”.1 Evangelical Protestants offered Jews support in these struggles. The nature of this support has become the subject of growing but divergent interest among scholars. Nadia Valman has explored the figure of “the Jew” in the evangelical imagination. She highlights the gendered ambivalence of evangelical representations of “the Jew”. She draws attention to the repeated iteration of the dual images of the “good” (spiritual and feeling) Jewess and the “bad” (materialistic and legalistic) Jew.2 In contrast to this approach, which points to an irreducible ambivalence in evangelical attitudes, recent books by Donald Lewis and by Hilary and William Rubinstein, reach unreservedly positive conclusions. Lewis deprecates what he sees as “an article of faith” among scholars “that the professed love of Jews by Christians is in some way a form of antisemitism, in spite of all evidence to the contrary.” The Rubinsteins highlight what they regard as a powerful and neglected tradition of Christian philosemitism.3 The 1 Miles Taylor, “John Bull and the Iconography of Public Opinion in England c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mortara Affair and the Question of Thomas Aquinas's Teaching
    SCJR 14, no. 1 (2019): 1-18 The Mortara Affair and the Question of Thomas Aquinas’s Teaching Against Forced Baptism MATTHEW TAPIE [email protected] Saint Leo University, Saint Leo, FL 33574 Introduction In January 2018, controversy over the Mortara affair remerged in the United States with the publication of Dominican theologian Romanus Cessario’s essay de- fending Pius IX’s decision to remove Edgardo Mortara, from his home, in Bologna.1 In order to forestall anti-Catholic sentiment in reaction to an upcoming film, Cessario argued that the separation of Edgardo from his Jewish parents is what the current Code of Canon Law, and Thomas Aquinas’s theology of baptism, required.2 For some, the essay damaged Catholic-Jewish relations. Writing in the Jewish Review of Books, the Archbishop of Philadelphia, Charles Chaput, lamented that Cessario’s defense of Pius revived a controversy that has “left a stain on Catholic- Jewish relations for 150 years.” “The Church,” wrote Chaput, “has worked hard for more than 60 years to heal such wounds and repent of past intolerance toward the Jewish community. This did damage to an already difficult effort.”3 In the 1 On June 23rd, 1858, Pope Pius IX ordered police of the Papal States to remove a six-year-old Jewish boy, Edgardo Mortara, from his home, in Bologna, because he had been secretly baptized by his Chris- tian housekeeper after allegedly falling ill. Since the law of the Papal States stipulated that a person baptized must be raised Catholic, Inquisition authorities forcibly removed Edgardo from his parents’ home, and transported him to Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Home That Never Was: Rethinking Space and Memory in Late Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Jewish History Wolff, Frank
    www.ssoar.info The home that never was: rethinking space and memory in late nineteenth and twentieth-century Jewish history Wolff, Frank Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Wolff, F. (2013). The home that never was: rethinking space and memory in late nineteenth and twentieth-century Jewish history. Historical Social Research, 38(3), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.38.2013.3.197-215 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-379776 The Home that Never Was: Rethinking Space and Memory in Late Nineteenth and Twentieth- Century Jewish History ∗ Frank Wolff Abstract: »Das Zuhause, das es nie gegeben hat: Neue Überlegungen zu Raum und Erinnerung in der jüdischen Geschichte des späten 19. und 20. Jahrhun- derts«. Recent research on Jewish migration and “Jewish spaces” usually asks for the relevance of “Jewish spaces” in Jewish life. This article looks the other way and examines how the changing conditions of Jewish life altered emi- grant’s perceptions of their “old home” in East Europe. It argues that in Jewish memory East Europe functioned as a mythscape which changed from a repres- sive and revolutionary over a progressive to the lost “old home”.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of Fourth Amendment Disrespect: from Elian to the Internment
    Fordham Law Review Volume 70 Issue 6 Article 18 2002 Stories of Fourth Amendment Disrespect: From Elian to the Internment Andrew E. Taslitz Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrew E. Taslitz, Stories of Fourth Amendment Disrespect: From Elian to the Internment, 70 Fordham L. Rev. 2257 (2002). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol70/iss6/18 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stories of Fourth Amendment Disrespect: From Elian to the Internment Cover Page Footnote Visiting Professor, Duke University Law School, 2000-01; Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law; J.D., University of Pennsylvania School of Law, 1981, former Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I thank my wife, Patricia V. Sun, Esq., Professors Robert Mosteller, Sara Sun-Beale, Girardeau Spann, joseph Kennedy, Eric Muller, Ronald Wright, and many other members of the Triangle Criminal Law Working Group, for their comments on early drafts of this Article. I also thank my research assistants, Nicole Crawford, Eli Mazur, and Amy Pope, and my secretary, Ann McCloskey. Appreciation also goes to the Howard University School of Law for funding this project, and to the Duke University Law School for helping me see this effort through to its completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Family, Church and State: an Essay on Constitutionalism and Religious Authority Carol Weisbrod University of Connecticut School of Law
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Faculty Articles and Papers School of Law 1988 Family, Church and State: An Essay on Constitutionalism and Religious Authority Carol Weisbrod University of Connecticut School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers Part of the Family Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Weisbrod, Carol, "Family, Church and State: An Essay on Constitutionalism and Religious Authority" (1988). Faculty Articles and Papers. 146. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers/146 +(,121/,1( Citation: 26 J. Fam. L. 741 1987-1988 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Aug 15 18:30:25 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=1531-0183 FAMILY, CHURCH AND STATE: AN ESSAY ON CONSTITUTIONALISM AND RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY By Carol Weisbrod* I. INTRODUCTION The following essay attempts a formal pluralist analysis of rela- tions between church and state in the United States and suggests that such an analysis is useful in describing the role of religious and other non-state authority in the American context. The specific focus is on church-state interactions in relation to the family, and illustrative ma- terial is taken from the history of American family law.
    [Show full text]
  • Contradistinction to What the Ministers 01 Rcn- Gion Require, Is More Than
    ponents, that no one can be more opposed to a contradistinction to what the ministers 01 rcn- A BOARD OP DEPUTIES. church tyranny than wo are; but we ourself too gion require, is more than we can determine; No. II. often want li ght and information, and therefore but to our understanding there can be no diver - In our No. 15, we commenced a discussion, desire to have those at hand who have the confi- sity of wants whore the interests so perfectly co- somewhat desultory indeed, on the plan indefi- dence of the !)eoplc , and are able to impart to us incide. For we hold i ( self-evident, that the peo- nitcly propounded from New York, respecting a such instruction that we can follow it imp licitl y pie both need reli gious information and arc also Board of Deputies for the !Tnited States. Since in our private affairs and in the administration desirous to obtain it , as much as the ministers then we have had a conversation with a gentle- of public business. should be capable and anxious to impart it. To man in Baltimore, received a letter from an in - But in stating this as one,if not the first of all suppose for a moment that it were otherwise fluential Israelite in the West, and inserted a the objects of a Board of Deputies, we do not would constitute our religious teachers a species communication in our last from Dr. Mayer in mean to confine its action to this point only. So of oli garchy with interests divers and separate Charleston, all , in a measure, controverting the much can be done by united action, so many from those of their constituents, in which case position we assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern Church
    Chapter 1 The Modern Church A man jumped from the crowd—a knife shimmered. Count Rossi’s scream was loud, but brief. The pope’s friend and now political colleague was suddenly on the ground, dying, stabbed with a dagger in the neck as he ascended the assembly hall stairs to present his plan for a new con- stitutional order. Rossi had been warned. The anger was tangible ever since Pius IX had withdrawn the papal army from the First Italian War of Independence. Violence had broken out in the streets of Rome, and Count Rossi had been declared an enemy of the people. That’s why none of the Civic Guards who witnessed his murder in the courtyard made any attempt to arrest the killer. Whatever His Holiness might say, it was nec- essary to get him out of Rome. Thankfully, the King of the Two Sicilies had offered him refuge. Pius escaped to Gaeta, about seventy-five miles south, disguised as an ordinary priest. Giving government addresses to a papal parliament was not some- thing popes or their assistants were used to doing. For centuries popes had governed their territory as monarchs, gaining vital protection for the Church against hostile kings, dukes, and nations. But when Giovanni-Ma- ria Mastai-Ferretti was elected Pope Pius IX in 1846, the world around him was moving toward parliamentary governments. The world was changing fast, in ways both good and bad. The sobriquet “first modern pope” has been applied to various popes of the recent and not-so-recent past. Pius IX probably deserves it most, though he would have wanted it least.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1 The principal works were Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987); Ilan Pappé, Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948–1951 (Basingstoke: Macmillan in associa- tion with St. Antony’s College Oxford, 1988); Avi Shlaim, Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist Movement and the Partition of Palestine (Oxford: Clarendon, 1988). 2 On the origins of this myth, see pp. 85–87. 3 In particular, see Barbara Tuchman, The Bible and the Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour (New York: New York University Press, 1956), pp. xiv, 311–312, 337; Franz Kobler, The Vision was There: A History of the British Movement for the Restoration of the Jews (London: Lincolns-Prager, 1956), pp. 117–124; David Fromkin, A Peace to End all Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East (New York: Avon Books, 1989), pp. 267–268, 283, 298; Ronald Sanders, The High Walls of Jerusalem: A History of the Balfour Declaration and the Birth of the British Mandate for Palestine (New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1983), pp. 73–74, 615. 4 Leonard Stein, The Balfour Declaration (London: Vallentine Mitchell, 1961). 5 Ibid., pp. 549–550. In his explanation of the Balfour Declaration David Lloyd George himself had emphasised the importance of the need for pro- Allied propaganda among Jewry. David Lloyd George, Memoirs of the Peace Conference, Vol. II (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1939), pp. 723–724. 6 Mayir Vereté, ‘The Balfour Declaration and its Makers’, Middle Eastern Studies, 6, 1 (Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara: Contemporary Lessons in the Child Welfare Wars Bruce A
    Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2000 The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara: Contemporary Lessons in the Child Welfare Wars Bruce A. Boyer Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, [email protected] Steven Lubet Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Boyer, Bruce A, and Lubet, Steven, The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara: Contemporary Lessons in the Child Welfare Wars, 45 Vill. L. Rev. 245 (2000) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2000] Article THE KIDNAPPING OF EDGARDO MORTARA: CONTEMPORARY LESSONS IN THE CHILD WELFARE WARS BRUCE A. BOYER* STEVEN LUBET** I. INTRODUCTION IN recent years, with increasing regularity, legal scholars and other com- mentators have called for changes in the legal systems and rules that govern child welfare.' Much of this discourse has been driven by a series of wrenching custody cases, in which judges have been called upon to bal- ance the claims of biological parents against those of third parties who have established durable attachments with children in their care. Under- standably, public opinion almost invariably supports the "de facto" or "psy- chological" parents, on the ground that it would do enormous harm to remove young children from a nurturing home. At the same time, claims of birth parents tend to be discounted as rigid formalities-mere proce- dural rights of adults that should not be allowed to interfere with the obvi- ous and unarguable interests of the children.
    [Show full text]
  • BEDE JARRETT, ARTHUR DAY and HANS HERZL Simon Mayers
    ZIONISM AND ANTI-ZIONISM IN THE CATHOLIC GUILD OF ISRAEL: BEDE JARRETT, ARTHUR DAY AND HANS HERZL Simon Mayers* ABSTRACT: This article examines Zionism and Anti-Zionism in the discourse of key members of the Catholic Guild of Israel, an English Catholic movement for the conversion of the Jews. The central theme in the discourse of the Guild was Jewish ‘power’. It was argued that the Jews had great vitality, zeal and energy, which made them dangerous outside of the Church, but an asset if they could be brought into it. This idea was disseminated by Bede Jarrett and Arthur Day, the two most senior and prolific members of the Guild. Their notions of Jewish power influenced their views about Jews and Zionism. They both saw Jewish power and Zionism as a threat and opportunity, but Jarrett placed the emphasis on threat, whilst Day placed the emphasis on opportunity. One prominent member of the Guild who did not gravitate to their views was Hans Herzl, a convert to Catholicism and the son of the Zionist leader, Theodor Herzl. On the surface Hans adopted the anti-Zionism of Jarrett. Unlike Jarrett, however, Hans believed in Jewish nationalism, although he interpreted it as a spiritual rather than political movement. His ideal Jewish nation was a ‘Christian theocracy of Jewish faith’ with the Pope as sovereign and protector. During the early decades of the twentieth-century, Jews were often stereotyped and mythologized in English Catholic newspapers, books, sermons and pastoral letters, as usurers, cowards, bolsheviks, conspirators, Christ-Killers and Antichrists.1 From 1917 onwards, following the Balfour Declaration, these myths and stereotypes combined with criticisms of Zionism to form a new composite construction: ‘the Zionist Menace’.
    [Show full text]