Evolution of the Smartphone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of the Smartphone MWJPerspective Evolution of the Smartphone Todd Gillenwater, Mobile Products CTO and VP of Engineering Qorvo, Greensboro, N.C. n less than 10 years, mobile Ride-sharing companies like Uber smartphone designed for global phones have evolved from rely on the ubiquity of mobile de- use may support more than 30 tools used mostly for talking vices that let users find and pay for bands today, compared with fewer and texting to highly complex, rides that are automatically direct- than 10 in 2010. The trend is con- Isophisticated devices that are cen- ed to their locations. tinuing, as regulators allocate new tral to almost every aspect of our All of these applications mean that higher frequency bands at 3.5 GHz lives. They have changed the way high speed, highly reliable data con- and above and refarm existing we communicate, letting us share nections are essential to everyone’s spectrum, such as the 600 MHz experiences in real time by upload- daily life. Demand for mobile data band previously used for TV broad- ing and downloading live video. continues to grow rapidly: the No- casting. Channel bandwidth has in- They guide us while driving, mak- vember 2016 Ericsson Mobility Re- creased, from 200 kHz with 2G to ing paper maps almost port predicts that global smartphone 20 MHz with 4G, even more using obsolete. They have subscriptions will rise from 3.3 bil- carrier aggregation (CA) in LTE Ad- become univer- lion in 2015 to 6.8 billion in 2022, vanced (see Figure 1). This is be- sal controllers with the data used per smart- ing combined with techniques for for Internet of phone expected to rise nearly 8x producing higher data rates and Things (IoT) to 11 GB/month over the same capacity from a given bandwidth, devices rang- period. Trends such as virtual re- such as MIMO, more complex ing from home ality and real-time video require modulation and network densifi- thermostats high performance networks cation, including the use of small to hotel room that provide low latency as well cells. door locks. as higher data rates. Today, key trends include LTE And they have To handle the growth in mo- Advanced, which network opera- enabled com- bile data, successive network tors are now deploying, and its panies to create generations—2G, 3G, 4G (LTE) successor LTE Advanced Pro (de- entire new cloud- and, in the future, 5G—have used fined in 3GPP Release 13 and based business a variety of methods to progres- later releases). These LTE network models. sively increase network enhancements ensure that 4G will capacity and data continue to play an important role rates. One way even after 5G begins to be de- is allocating ployed. LTE will operate in paral- many more lel with 5G and provide adequate frequency performance for many applica- bands. tions. LTE Advanced introduced A flag- CA, which aggregates the band- ship LTE width of up to five RF carriers, Reprinted with permission of MICROWAVE JOURNAL from the February 2017 issue. ©2017 Horizon House Publications, Inc. MWJPerspective TABLE 1 COMMON CELLULAR BANDS 1 Gbps 600 Mbps Band Uplink (MHz) Downlink (MHz) Duplex Type 4 CA ate 450 Mbps 2 × 2 MIMO 1 1920 to 1980 2110 to 2170 FDD R 3 CA Cat 11/12 3 1710 to 1785 1805 to 1880 FDD ata D 300 Mbps 2 × 2 MIMO 4 1710 to 1755 2110 to 2155 FDD 20 + 20 MHz Cat 9 150 Mbps 2 × 2 MIMO 7 2500 to 2570 2620 to 2690 FDD ownlink D 10 + 10 MHz Cat 6 2 × 2 MIMO 17 704 to 716 734 to 746 FDD 25 1850 to 1915 1930 to 1995 FDD 2013 2014 2015 2016 40 2300 to 2400 2300 to 2400 TDD 41 2496 to 2690 2496 to 2690 TDD Fig. 1 Increasing downlink data rate enabled by carrier s 66 1710 to 1780 2110 to 2200 FDD aggregation. called component carriers (CC). between different bands, between LTE Advanced allows maximum the transmit and receive frequen- network data rates up to 1 Gbps, cies of each frequency division du- Third and LTE Advanced Pro will increase plex (FDD) LTE band and between Harmonic the possible number of CCs to 32, LTE and other wireless services, allowing up to 3 Gbps. Wi-Fi is be- such as Wi-Fi and public safety coming more important with the communications. High perfor- introduction in LTE Advanced Pro mance acoustic filters are needed Uplink Downlink Downlink of licensed assisted access (LAA), to achieve the required isolation. Band 17 Band 17 Band 4 which uses CA to combine licensed Bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filters LTE spectrum with unlicensed Wi- provide better performance (high- Fi spectrum at 5 GHz to achieve er Q factors) than surface acoustic s Fig. 2 With carrier aggregation, the greater data rates. wave (SAW) filters, especially at third harmonic of the Band 17 uplink higher frequencies, and are typi- signal can interfere with the receive SMARTPHONE TRENDS AND cally used for the most demanding signal in Band 4. CHALLENGES applications. As smartphone data perfor- The isolation challenges increase interference, the filters in the RF mance requirements continue to with CA, because the RF front-end front-end must provide very high grow, so does the complexity of must communicate simultaneously rejection of the problem harmon- the RF front-end, creating a series on multiple bands. This leads to ics without adding unacceptable of new challenges for the engineers new requirements for cross-isola- insertion loss. High linearity is re- working on smartphone designs. tion between bands, to avoid situ- quired in all the components— Today’s requirements are creat- ations where the transmit signal of PAs, switches, filters—to minimize ing design challenges that include one aggregated band interferes the generation of harmonics. maximizing linearity and isolation, with receive signals on another ag- A different cross-isolation issue managing power consumption and gregated band, which will degrade occurs when aggregating closely antenna tuning. Greater integration the sensitivity of the receiver. There spaced bands, which typically is required, since an increasing num- are various problem scenarios. share the same RF pathway within ber of bands must squeeze into the When aggregating widely sepa- the RF front-end. Examples include limited space allocated to the RF rated frequency bands, issues can bands 1 and 3 and bands 25 and front-end. Another important trend arise with harmonic frequencies 66. In these cases, the problem is is the emergence of smartphone generated at multiples of the trans- that the transmit frequency of one market tiers, each with differing RF mit frequency by non-linear com- band is close to the receive fre- requirements. This article discusses ponents in the RF chain, including quency of the other aggregated each of these and how the smart- power amplifiers (PA), switches and band. Multiplexers, which combine phone will evolve to handle 5G. even filters. With some band com- all the transmit and receive filters binations, such as bands 17 and 4 for multiple aggregated bands into Isolation (see Table 1), the third harmonic of a single device, provide an effi- The requirement to accommo- the lower frequency band (17) falls cient solution, allowing simultane- date more LTE bands within the into the receive frequency range ous use of the aggregated bands RF front-end creates challenges of the higher frequency band (4), while providing isolation between achieving the necessary isolation as shown in Figure 2. To prevent them. Multiplexers will become MWJPerspective increasingly important as network operators aggregate three or more Hexaplexer bands (see Figure 3), due to limits Band 1 on the available space and number Quadplexer Tx of antennas within the smartphone. Band 1 Band 1 Tx Rx Power Management Duplexer Single Filter Band 3 Band 1 Band 3 Several trends require better Rx Rx Tx Common Band 3 Common Common Common power management to maximize Port Rx Port Port Port smartphone battery life and avoid Band 3 Band 3 Band 3 Tx Tx Rx overheating. Greater transmission bandwidth, achieved with tech- Band 3 Band 7 niques such as uplink CA, will re- Rx Tx quire more power. Also, intra-band Band 7 uplink CA, which combines compo- Rx nent carriers within a single band, involves higher peak-to-average s Fig. 3 Multiplexers become increasingly important as network operators aggregate power ratios than standard LTE sig- bands to increase data rates. nals, increasing the demand on PA linearity. For example, doubling the a Network Problem” in this issue, space allocated to the RF front- uplink bandwidth with CA to 20 + page 102.) end has not increased. In today’s flagship phones, typically only 10 20 MHz (200 resource blocks) more Antennas than doubles the probability that to 15 percent of the internal area the peak-to-average power ratio of The number of antennas in is dedicated to cellular, Wi-Fi and the modulated signal envelope will smartphones has grown with the Bluetooth RF functionality. Smart- exceed 4.5 dB. requirement to support faster data phones are getting thinner, reduc- Another emerging requirement services as well as the growing ing the internal volume, and manu- is Power Class 2, a new standard range of RF frequencies and tech- facturers need to use the available that doubles output power to 26 nologies. Today’s handsets may space for new functionality and to dBm to overcome the greater prop- include as many as six or seven an- maximize battery size to respond agation losses of high frequency tennas, including primary cellular to user demands for longer op- bands (e.g., Band 41). The greater and diversity receive (DRx), Wi-Fi, erating time.
Recommended publications
  • 1G 2G 3G LTE 4G What's Next
    What’s Next in the Cellular Evolution & How to Leverage it for New Business As you will come to see, this goal can 2006 only be accomplished by phasing out 3G and reallocating the extra bandwidth to 4G LTE. This task can only be described 2001 as daunting and challenging from not just 2018 our security perspective, but more so from theirs. 1989 Looking for more proof? First, because of demand it is necessary to upgrade all cellular networks on a regular basis. Two 2002 billion people on the planet use cellphones, according to James Katz, professor of com- munication at Rutgers University. In fact, as of 2011 there were more cellphone sub- 1999 scribers in the United States than people, ac- LTE cording to a study, underwritten by CTIA, a trade association representing the wireless 1983 1G 2G 3G 4G communications industry in the U.S., as re- ported by Bridget Kelly, author of “What Is Courtesy of Napco StarLink the Role of the Cell Phone in Communica- tion Today?” Ride the New Wave in Cellular for New RMR Society at large is becoming more mo- bile-oriented because of convenience, busi- There’s undeniably a lot of upside system control, remote video monitoring or ness and personal lifestyles. According to for savvy installing security contractors long-distance doorbells. We as an industry market research firm Statista of New York and fire/life-safety professionals whose are on the small screen to the tune of brand City, the number of smartphone users is billable offerings keep pace with the new relevance and new recurring revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Wireless Communications (Key Milestones in the Development of Wireless Communications Are Listed)
    Lect4: History of Wireless Communications (key milestones in the development of wireless communications are listed) Dr. Yazid Khattabi Communication Systems Course EE Department University of Jordan 2018 Dr. Yazid Khattabi. The University of Jordan 1 History of wireless communications Terrestrial fixed links (telephone services) ~ 1940s. Satellite intercontinental links ~1960s. Cellular mobile communications: The fastest growing industry. 1G, 2G. 2.5G, 3G, 3.9G, 4G,5G Number of subscribers increasing rapidly Financial investment More developments address challenges understanding the wireless channel characteristics 2018 Dr. Yazid Khattabi. The University of Jordan 2 History of wireless communications . 1820: Oersted demonstrated that an electric current produces a magnetic field. 1831: Faraday showed that a changing magnetic field produces an electric field. 1837: Samuel Morse invented Telegraph (not wireless). 1864: From that Maxwell predicted EM radiation existence. Formulated the basic theory of electromagnetics (which is basis of wireless comm.) [41]. 1876: Alexander Bell Invention of the telephone (not wireless). 1887: Hertz verified Maxwell’s theory experimentally. 1894: coherer invented by Lodge: a sensitive device that detects radio signals and was used to demonstrate wireless communication at a 150 yards distance. 2018 Dr. Yazid Khattabi. The University of Jordan 4 History of wireless communications . 1895: Marconi has demonstrated first radio signal transmission ~ 2 km. • 1897: Marconi patented a radio telegraph system and founded the Wireless Telegraph and Signal Company [42,43]. He demonstrated mobile wireless communication to ships. • 1898: Marconi experiments with a land ‘mobile’ radio system (LMR) – the apparatus is the size of a bus with a 7 m antenna. • 1916: The British Navy uses Marconi’s wireless apparatus in the Battle of Jutland to track and engage the enemy fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Wireless Radio Technologies: a Survey
    future internet Review Long-Range Wireless Radio Technologies: A Survey Brandon Foubert * and Nathalie Mitton Inria Lille - Nord Europe, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 11 January 2020; Published: 14 January 2020 Abstract: Wireless networks are now a part of the everyday life of many people and are used for many applications. Recently, new technologies that enable low-power and long-range communications have emerged. These technologies, in opposition to more traditional communication technologies rather defined as "short range", allow kilometer-wide wireless communications. Long-range technologies are used to form Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWAN). Many LPWAN technologies are available, and they offer different performances, business models etc., answering different applications’ needs. This makes it hard to find the right tool for a specific use case. In this article, we present a survey about the long-range technologies available presently as well as the technical characteristics they offer. Then we propose a discussion about the energy consumption of each alternative and which one may be most adapted depending on the use case requirements and expectations, as well as guidelines to choose the best suited technology. Keywords: long-range; wireless; IoT; LPWAN; mobile; cellular; LoRa; Sigfox; LTE-M; NB-IoT 1. Introduction Wireless radio technologies, such as Wi-Fi, are used daily to enable inter-device communications. In the last few years, new kinds of wireless technologies have emerged. In opposition to standard wireless technologies referred to as “short-range”, long-range radio technologies allow devices to communicate over kilometers-wide distances at a low energy cost, but at the expense of a low data rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Land Mobile Radio Services: Background
    Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Staff Paper Private Land Mobile Radio Services: Background December 18, 1996 Michele Farquhar, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Project Team David Wye John Borkowski Eli Johnson Sean Fleming Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Staff Paper Private Land Mobile Radio Services: Background December 18, 1996 Michele Farquhar, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Project Team David Wye John Borkowski Eli Johnson Sean Fleming Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Staff Paper The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the many representatives of the private wireless community who contributed to this Staff Paper. Within the Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, many people were also generous with their time and attention, and contributed valuable insights and comments. The information, perspectives, and suggestions all these contributors provided greatly improved the final product. The views expressed in this Staff Paper do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Communications Commission or any individual Commissioner. This Staff Paper is not a statement of policy by the Commision, nor does it bind the Commission in any way. We do not intend by this Paper to prejudge the outcome of any proceeding that is now or may in the future come before the Commission. Executive Summary Since the 1920s, the private land mobile radio services (PLMRS) have been meeting the internal communication needs of private companies, state and local governments, and other organizations. These services provide voice and data communications that allow entities to control their business operations and production processes, protect worker and public safety, and respond quickly in times of natural disaster or other emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Interface of 5G New Radio
    Radio Interface of 5G New Radio Marceau Coupechoux 3 Mar. 2021 MC 5G New Radio 3 Mar. 2021 1 / 83 Introduction Why 5G ? Some potential 5G applications : Multimedia Health • Tele-surgery • Ultra HD video • Bio-connectivity: monitoring, • Immersive and interactive diagnosis, treatment experiences (AR/VR, virtual presence, tactile internet) • Network games • Live/streaming/on demand • Collaborative productions, social networks • Mobile and adaptive • Wearable device contents communications • On demand networking (for • Ambulance- temporary events) hospital [Da Vinci] communications MC 5G New Radio 3 Mar. 2021 2 / 83 Introduction Why 5G ? Industry Energy • Collaborative robots • Smart grids • Factory monitoring and control automation • Fault detections • Consumptions forecasts • Remote • Flow routing controls and • Smart meters diagnostics • Renewable energy management • Indoor communications • Home monitoring • Logistics: goods identification, tracking • Connected drones, collaborating drones [LAAS/CNRS] MC 5G New Radio 3 Mar. 2021 3 / 83 Introduction Why 5G ? Public services Intelligent Transport Systems • Public safety: operations of first responders in case of emergency • Real-time control of vehicles or disaster; presence and • Driver assistance localization of survivors; low • Road traffic monitoring (floating network and terminal energy car data) consumptions • Accident prevention • Remote vehicles diagnostics • Public warning system • V2X communications • Multimedia priority service for police, army, firemen • Platooning • Wide area sensor monitoring • Mobility support: high quality (forests, air and water quality) network access in buses, trains • Private mobile radio (PMR) and airplanes And many others that we don’t even know today... For more information and references : [3GPP 22.891, 2016] MC 5G New Radio 3 Mar. 2021 4 / 83 Introduction Outlines 1 Introduction 2 Use cases classification 3 Challenges 4 Key enablers 5 5G NR radio interface 6 Conclusion MC 5G New Radio 3 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Overview Tim Burgener | April 2017 Agenda
    Cellular Overview Tim Burgener | April 2017 Agenda • Cellular Frequencies • Certifications • Cellular Antennas • Operational Highlights • Security • IIoT • Field Input 4/20/2017 2 Cellular Frequencies Do you need to memorize this? 4/20/2017 3 Cellular Frequencies Do you need to memorize this? 4/20/2017 4 Cellular Frequencies * Excerpt taken from Red Lion Product hardware guide 4/20/2017 5 Cellular Frequencies MC7354-AM MC7304-EU AT&T Verizon Vodafone - Germany LTE Band I - 2100 Band II - 1900 Band III - 1800 Band IV - 1700 Band V - 850 Band VII (7) - 2600 Band VIII (8) - 900 Band XXII (12) - 700 Band XIII (13) - 700 Band XVII (17) - 700 Band XX (20) - 800 Band XXV (25) - 1900 UMTS Band I - 2100 Band II - PCS 1900 Band III - DCS 1800 Band IV - AWS 1700/2100 Band V - 850 Band VI - 800 Band VIII - 900 CDMA Band 0 - 800 Band 1 - PCS Band 10 - 800 4/20/2017 6 Cellular Frequencies Why do we have different radios in different products? • Don’t remember all the frequencies. Remember the product breakdown has already been done. What happened to GE? – Generic within a region – (AM and EU) Specific Carriers • RAM6900-AT, -VZ, -EU • Software selection • Field switching 4/20/2017 7 Cellular Frequencies 4/20/2017 8 Cellular Frequencies Some sources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LTE_networks Customer has a question? Cross reference their country/network with our product guide. http://www.worldtimezone.com/gsm.html http://blog.fosketts.net/2012/05/14/making-sense-global-mobile- phone-networks/ 4/20/2017 9
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Communications
    Cellular Communications Definition A cellular mobile communications system uses a large number of low-power wireless transmitters to create cells—the basic geographic service area of a wireless communications system. Variable power levels allow cells to be sized according to the subscriber density and demand within a particular region. As mobile users travel from cell to cell, their conversations are "handed off" between cells in order to maintain seamless service. Channels (frequencies) used in one cell can be reused in another cell some distance away. Cells can be added to accommodate growth, creating new cells in unserved areas or overlaying cells in existing areas. Overview This tutorial discusses the basics of radio telephony systems, including both analog and digital systems. Upon completion of this tutorial, you should be able to accomplish the following: 1. describe the basic components of a cellular system 2. identify and describe digital wireless technologies Topics 1. Mobile Communications Principles 2. Mobile Telephone System Using the Cellular Concept 3. Cellular System Architecture 4. North American Analog Cellular Systems 5. Cellular System Components 6. Digital Systems Self-Test Correct Answers Acronym Guide 1. Mobile Communications Principles Each mobile uses a separate, temporary radio channel to talk to the cell site. The cell site talks to many mobiles at once, using one channel per mobile. Channels use a pair of frequencies for communication—one frequency, the forward link, for transmitting from the cell site, and one frequency, the reverse link, for the cell site to receive calls from the users. Radio energy dissipates over distance, so mobiles must stay near the base station to maintain communications.
    [Show full text]
  • 000. {Water 015% {I025 Patent Application Publication Nov
    US 20120282942A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0282942 A1 Uusitalo et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 8, 2012 (54) METHODS, APPARATUSES AND COMPUTER Publication Classi?cation PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR CONFIGURING (51) Int. Cl. FREQUENCY AGGREGATION H04W 72/00 (2009.01) (52) Us. or. ................................................... .. 455/452.2 (75) Inventors: Mikko Aleksi Uusitalo, Helsinki (57) ABSTRACT (Fl); Mika Petri Olavi Rinne, An apparatus for determining Whether to deactivate a second Espoo (Fl); Antti Sakari Sorri, ary cell includes a processor and memory storing executable Helsinki (Fl); Carl Simon Wijting, computer program code that cause the apparatus to at least Espoo (Fl); Claudio Rosa, Randers perform operations including determining that a secondary (DK) cell should be deactivated based on a measurement(s) of the secondary cell or received information associated With fre quency spectrum of the secondary cell. The computer pro (73) Assignees: Nokia Siemens Networks Oy; gram code may cause the apparatus to generate a deactivation Nokia Corporation message responsive to the measurement(s) indicating sec ondary cell interference or the received information indicat ing that the apparatus should no longer use the frequency (21) Appl. No.: 13/099,019 spectrum. The computer program code may cause the appa ratus to provide the deactivation message to a netWork device. Corresponding methods and computer program products are (22) Filed: May 2, 2011 also provided. @150; " _' 00?. 0mm rage iremzzzmriif * % 000. {water 015% {i025 Patent Application Publication Nov. 8, 2012 Sheet 1 0f 11 US 2012/0282942 A1 Fig‘ 18. m FIG. Patent Application Publication Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Location for Futuristic Cellular Communications
    O. Kanhere and T. S. Rappaport, “Position Location for Futuristic Cellular Communications - 5G and Beyond,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 70-75, January 2021. Position Location for Futuristic Cellular Communications - 5G and Beyond Ojas Kanhere and Theodore S. Rappaport NYU WIRELESS NYU Tandon School of Engineering Brooklyn, NY 11201 {ojask, tsr}@nyu.edu Abstract—With vast mmWave spectrum and narrow of geo-tagged Wi-Fi hotspots have been used by beam antenna technology, precise position location is companies such as Apple and Google. The UE now possible in 5G and future mobile communication may be localized using the known positions of all systems. In this article, we describe how centimeter- level localization accuracy can be achieved, particularly Wi-Fi hotspots that the UE can hear, where the through the use of map-based techniques. We show how UE position estimate is formed from the weighted data fusion of parallel information streams, machine average of the received signal strengths, providing learning, and cooperative localization techniques further an accuracy of tens of meters. Although FCC improve positioning accuracy. requirements specify a horizontal localization error of less than 50 m for 80 percent of enhanced I. INTRODUCTION 911 (E911) callers, a localization error less than Precise position location (also called position- 3 m will be required for positioning applications ing or localization) is a key application for the of the future. Additionally, FCC requires a vertical fifth generation (5G) of mobile communications localization error less than 3 m for 80 percent of and beyond, wherein the position of objects is E911 callers by April 2021, to identify the caller’s determined to within centimeters.
    [Show full text]
  • M2M Cellular Antennas: SISO V. MIMO
    M2M Cellular Antennas: SISO v. MIMO Introduction This whitepaper discusses Single Input Single Output (“SISO”) and Multiple Input Multiple Output (“MIMO”) antennas for use in 4G1 LTE cellular technology. Frequency Bands As seen in Figure 1. Cellular Frequency Bands2, in 2G cellular technologies, only certain bands were required for operation in most of the world—thus, a quad-band radio operating at four frequencies, with antennas in two basic ranges, was sufficient. 3G Cellular typically added two more bands in most regions: the AWS and UMTS frequency pairs of 1700/2100 MHz and 1900/2100 MHz. FIGURE 1. CELLULAR FREQUENCY BANDS However, in 4G LTE, the number of available bands has increased dramatically— particularly if the cellular device is to be deployed in multiple areas of the world. Thus, LTE antennas need to support a wide-range of cellular frequencies: typically from 700 MHz to 2600 MHz to cover deployments today. This support needs to include antenna parameters such as: • Efficiency: The radiated power / power delivered to the antenna input (which takes into account mismatch loss, as well as antenna losses and losses in the surroundings). • Return Loss: The amount of power that is reflected at the input to the antenna or device, due to a less than perfect impedance match. • Isolation: A measure of power transfer from one antenna to another, also applicable to two-port antennas (such as dual-polarized or dual-band antennas) • Correlation Coefficient: A measure of the correlation between antennas in a multi-antenna system for their radiation pattern characteristics. 1 Please see Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Global-5G-Rise-Of-A-Transformational-Technology.Pdf
    Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 5 INTENSIFYING ROLE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS......................................... 7 Global Mobile Adoption ............................................................................................ 8 Transformational Elements ..................................................................................... 10 Expanding Use Cases ............................................................................................ 12 THE IMPACT OF 5G ............................................................................................... 16 5G Rollout............................................................................................................ 16 1G to 5G Evolution ................................................................................................ 17 5G Technical Objectives ......................................................................................... 21 5G Applications .................................................................................................... 22 5G Frequency Use ................................................................................................. 25 5G Schedule ......................................................................................................... 30 5G Device Availability ............................................................................................ 31 5G Phase One (Release 15) ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Intersection of HFC and 5G
    The Intersection of HFC and 5G A Technical Paper prepared for SCTE/ISBE by Keith R. Hayes Principal Broadband Advisors Group, LLC 175 Hog Farm Circle Canton, GA 30115 770-378-3595 [email protected] © 2017 SCTE-ISBE and NCTA. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Title Page Number Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ 3 Content ___________________________________________________________________________ 3 1. Wireless Mobility Evolution _______________________________________________________ 3 2. 5G Timeline and Foundational Pillars _______________________________________________ 4 3. 5G Spectrum and Radio Access Network (RAN) Densification ____________________________ 7 4. The 5G PAC (Power, Attachment, Connectivity) Conundrum ____________________________ 10 Conclusion ________________________________________________________________________ 12 Abbreviations ______________________________________________________________________ 13 Bibliography & References ___________________________________________________________ 14 List of Figures Title Page Number Figure 1 – Cellular Standards Timeline. Source: Broadband Advisors Group, LLC 3 Figure 2 – Verizon Wireless and ATT Coverage Map. Source: Engadget.com 5 Figure 3 – Key Capabilities IMT 2020 (5G) vs IMT 2015. Source: ITU-R M.2083.0 6 Figure 4 – 3GPP Release Calendar. Source: 3GPP.org 7 Figure 5 – Spectrum by Carrier US. Source: Sprint 9 Figure 6 – Cellular Block Licenses – top 3 US markets. Source: FCC 10 Figure 7 – 500-foot
    [Show full text]