DOCSLIB.ORG

Characteristics of the European Automotive System: Is There a Distinctive European Approach?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characteristics of the European Automotive System: Is There a Distinctive European Approach? A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Jürgens, Ulrich Working Paper Characteristics of the European automotive system: Is there a distinctive European approach? WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP III 2003-301 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Jürgens, Ulrich (2003) : Characteristics of the European automotive system: Is there a distinctive European approach?, WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP III 2003-301, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49646 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu WZB – discussion paper Ulrich Jürgens Characteristics of the European Automotive System: Is There a Distinctive European Approach? SP III 2003-301 [email protected] ZITIERWEISE/CITATION: Ulrich Jürgens Characteristics of the European Automotive System: Is There a Distinctive European Approach? Discussion Paper SP III 2003-301 Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (2003) Forschungsschwerpunkt: Research Area: Organisationen und Organizations and Wissen Knowledge Arbeitsgruppe: Working Group: Wissen, Produktionssysteme Knowledge, Production Systems und Arbeit and Work Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH (WZB) Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785 Berlin Telefon: +49 30 25491-272, Fax: +49 30 25491-255 www.wz-berlin.de/ow/wpa Abstract The paper discusses pro and cons concerning the hypothesis of a distinctive European approach regarding its automotive system. Its aim is to develop an international comparison of the structural changes in the international automo- tive industry. A special focus is laid on the ways of coordinating competencies and knowledge. What are the differences that set the European industry apart from its North American and Japanese competitors in this regard? The paper discusses EU market characteristics and particularities of the European de- mand structures, the history of specific European approaches in the area of production systems and new forms of work and the recent changes of supplier relations since the 1990s. The analysis shows that the approach taken in the course of the restructuring of the supplier industry in Europe led to the devel- opment of specific capabilities related to cross company and interorganisational cooperation in the 1990s which partially explains the successful development of the European auto industry in recent time. Zusammenfassung Das Paper diskutiert das Für und Wider der Hypothese eines besonderen euro- päischen Entwicklungsweges in der Automobilindustrie. Ziel ist, die gegenwärti- gen Umstrukturierungen dieser Industrien mit einer international vergleichenden Perspektive zu erfassen. Im Zentrum steht die Frage nach der Koordination von Kompetenzen und Wissen: Welche Unterschiede lassen sich hier im Vergleich der europäischen Industrie mit der in Nordamerika und Japan feststellen? Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass insbesondere hinsichtlich der Reorganisation der Zu- lieferbeziehungen ein besonderer europäischer Ansatz entwickelt wurde, der zur Herausbildung spezifischer Formen der unternehmensübergreifenden und interorganisationalen Kooperation geführt hat. Die damit verbundenen Lernpro- zesse haben zu spezifisch europäischen Konzepten und Kompetenzen geführt, die wesentlich zu der relativ erfolgreichen Entwicklung des Automobilsektors in Europa in den vergangenen Jahren beigetragen haben. Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 2. European Level Automobile Policy ..................................................... 3 3. Market Characteristics ........................................................................ 11 4. The Quest for an Alternative “European” Production System ............. 14 5. Europe’s Supplier Structure and the Direction of Its Restructuring ..... 19 5.1 Strategies towards Modularisation ...................................................... 19 5.2 The Trend towards Specialisation........................................................ 21 5.3 Niches and Specialists Related to the Sports Car/Racing Tradition .... 22 6. Challenges for Cross-company and Inter-organisational Cooperation 24 6.1 Cooperation at the Point of Assembly ................................................. 24 6.2 Cooperation at the Point of Product Development .............................. 27 6.3 Cooperation at the Interface between the OEMs and the Small and Medium enterprises (SME) ................................................................. 29 7. Conclusions ........................................................................................ 32 8. References ......................................................................................... 33 1. Introduction* The European Car Industry has had a strong start into the new century. After three problem-ridden previous decades, this is somewhat surprising. Only ten years ago, the Japanese auto industry seemed invincible, the 1980s saw the French and Italian car industries on their knees, and in the 1990s the German car companies scrambled to regain competitiveness. By the year 2000, the Europeans seem to have re-invented themselves. They were the ones to open the new round of mergers & acquisitions. As a result, the US car industry is no longer the Big Three after the takeover of Chrysler by Daimler, and two of the Japanese Big Five now belong to alliances dominated by European car compa- nies. Admittedly, it is not all roses within the European car industry. This is for instance indicated by the increasing difficulties of Fiat. In addition, the European resurgence may be owed to protectionist factors (such as the 10% tariff on cars imported to the EU versus 2.5% for passenger cars and 25% (!) for light trucks in the case of the USA and 0% in Japan1). However, some of the credit can be ascribed to good decision-making of European management and to differences in the approach the Europeans have taken vis-à-vis the restructuring of the automotive system. What might some of these differences be that set the Euro- pean industry apart from its North American and Japanese rivals? There certainly are characteristic features, which support the hypothesis of a European distinctiveness: – institutional conditions, industry policies of the EU and its member states, industrial relation systems, tax policies, environmental regulations; – the customer structure in terms of social characteristics, income, tastes re- flecting for instance geographical particularities, structures of urbanisation; – the industry structure in terms of OEM supplier, small and big company configurations. On the other hand, a number of factors speak against the hypothesis of Euro- pean distinctiveness: * This paper is based on research carried out at the Social Science Research Cen- ter Berlin (WZB) in the context of a research programme on Coordinating Compe- tencies and Knowledge in the European Automobile System (CoCKEAS) between 2000 and 2002. The CoCKEAS Programme was part of the work activities of the international network of automotive industry researchers, GERPISA, and it was fi- nanced by the European Union in its framework 5 programme (cf. Lung 2001). I am very grateful for all comments made in the context of the CoCKEAS and GERPISA activities. I would like to thank in particular Paul Bailey, Bruce Bel- zowski, Michel Freyssenet, Yannick Lung, Glenn Mercer, Anne Posthuma, Mari Sako, Mario Salerno, Takahiro Fujimoto and Koichi Shimokawa for their thoughtful and productive comments on the previous versions of the paper. I would also like to thank Peter Jansen for his help in compiling this report. As usual, any errors and lacks of clarity remain the responsibility of the author. The paper will also be published in forthcoming issues of the Actes du GERPISA, and, in a shortened version, in the International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management. 1 Cf. Jama (2001: 24). - 1 - – For a long time now, American companies have had a strong presence in Europe. The Japanese automakers have followed, and since recently stepped up pace to increase production inside Europe.2 Thus, today around 1/3 of the European automotive activities are being governed from outside. At least for the American manufacturers, however, it is also true that they have been part of the European automotive system for such a long time that their factories
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Separate Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2019
    201Separate financial9 statements PPorscheorsche TaycanTaycan TurboTurbo S 3 Content Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results of operations, financial position and net assets 31 Porsche Automobil Holding SE (financial statements pursuant to the German Commercial Code) 37 Sustainable value enhancement in the Porsche SE Group 41 Overall statement on the economic situation of Porsche SE and the Porsche SE Group 43 Remuneration report 44 Opportunities and risks of future development 52 Publication of the declaration of compliance and corporate governance report 78 Subsequent events 79 Forecast report and outlook 80 Glossary 85 4 Financials 86 Balance sheet of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 90 Income statement of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 91 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 92 Independent auditor’s report 212 Responsibility statement 220 5 VVolkswagenolkswagen IID.3D.3 6 1 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 7 8 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results
    [Show full text]
  • A Trip Through Autoland Saxony How Felix Discovered That the Future of the Automobile Starts Right Here at His Very Doorstep
    AUTO! A Trip Through Autoland Saxony How Felix discovered that the future of the automobile starts right here at his very doorstep. Hey Oldster, ... FeFelix wwhhispers as a greeting. Then hhee cacasttss a critical ggllancece what’s up? inside tthhe DKW F1, built almost 90 years aaggo iinn Zwickauu,, Saxony. Evveery couple ofof wweeeks, Felix is draawwn from tthhe WWeesst Saxxoon UnUniveversity of AAppplied Sciencesces Zwickau to tthhe August Horch Museum – and hhee always lingers for tthhe lloongest time witthh “his” DKW oldtimer. Some of FeFelix’ fellow sttuudents ccllaim he’s having conversations wwiitthh tthehe vinttaage ccaar; so far, FeFelix hhaassnn’t deniieded iitt ... YESTERDAY IN “AUTOLAND SAXONY:” 1900 AUDI is born “Coswiga” – the first passenger car from Saxony, built in Coswig in . in Saxony – in 1910 founded by the auto pioneer August Horch (under the Latin version of ces in the 1932 his last name) in Zwickau. In , Horch, Audi, DKW, and Wanderer joined for Steering wheel on Chemnitz-based “Auto-Union.” It’s trademark – the four interlocked rings. – what most car drivers take for granted today began its the left, gearshift lever in the center 1921 mass-produced front-wheel- global success story in Saxony (Audi Factory) in . The 1931 Lightweight drive was launched for the first time ever in in the DKW F1 from Saxony. 1955 s- construction with thermosetting plastics – In , Germany’s first vehicle with a mas renaissance of produced plastic body was the Sachsenring P70 (later known as “Trabant”). The 1990 “Autoland Saxony” was launched by VW in – with the founding of the VW Sachsen .
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF, 19 Pages, 505.25 KB
    VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Shareholdings of Volkswagen AG and the Volkswagen Group in accordance with sections 285 and 313 of the HGB and presentation of the companies included in Volkswagen's consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 12 as of 31.12.2019 Exchange rate VW AG 's interest Equity Profit/loss (1€ =) in capital in % in thousands, in thousands, Name and domicile of company Currency Dec. 31, 2019 Direct Indirect Total local currency local currency Footnote Year I. PARENT COMPANY VOLKSWAGEN AG, Wolfsburg II. SUBSIDIARIES A. Consolidated companies 1. Germany ASB Autohaus Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,272 1,415 2018 AUDI AG, Ingolstadt EUR 99.64 - 99.64 13,701,699 - 1) 2019 Audi Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,971 - 1) 2018 Audi Electronics Venture GmbH, Gaimersheim EUR - 100.00 100.00 60,968 - 1) 2019 Audi Frankfurt GmbH, Frankfurt am Main EUR - 100.00 100.00 8,477 - 1) 2018 Audi Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg EUR - 100.00 100.00 13,425 - 1) 2018 Audi Hannover GmbH, Hanover EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,621 - 1) 2018 AUDI Immobilien GmbH & Co. KG, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 82,470 3,399 2019 AUDI Immobilien Verwaltung GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 114,355 1,553 2019 Audi Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,525 - 1) 2018 Audi München GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 270 - 1) 2018 Audi Real Estate GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,859 4,073 2019 Audi Sport GmbH, Neckarsulm EUR - 100.00 100.00 100 - 1) 2019 Audi Stuttgart GmbH, Stuttgart EUR - 100.00 100.00 6,677 - 1) 2018 Auto & Service PIA GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 19,895 - 1) 2018 Autonomous Intelligent Driving GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 250 - 1) 2018 Autostadt GmbH, Wolfsburg EUR 100.00 - 100.00 50 - 1) 2018 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotion 3-2019
    auto motion IAV-Kundenmagazin | 03/2019 Next Level Automatisiertes Fahren bei IAV Bis zum selbstfahrenden automotion | Editorial 3 Fahrzeug sind es fünf Level. Wir erklären, was sie bedeuten. Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser, in Hamburg gilt seit einiger Zeit: The HEAT is on! Dahinter steckt die das System in einen Comfort Layer und einen Active Safety allerdings keine ungewöhnliche Hitzewelle in der Hansestadt – Layer aufteilt. Mehr dazu erfahren Sie in unserem Bericht auf stattdessen macht in der dortigen HafenCity ein autonomer, Seite 12. elektrisch angetriebener Shuttle von sich reden. Der Klimaschutz ist derzeit eines der beherrschenden Themen der SublineHEAT (Hamburg Electric Autonomous Transportation) wurde von politischen Debatte. Sicher ist: Auch der Mobilitätssektor muss IAV in Kooperation mit Partnern wie der Hamburger Hochbahn AG, einen Beitrag zur Verringerung der CO2-Emissionen leisten. Wie der Hamburger Behörde für Wirtschaft, Verkehr und Innovation genau das am besten zu erreichen ist, sollte aber offen und je nach (BWVI), der Siemens Mobility GmbH, dem IKEM – Institut für Anwendungsfall diskutiert werden. Neben batterieelektrischen Klimaschutz, Energie und Mobilität sowie dem Deutschen Zentrum Antrieben ist beispielsweise auch der Einsatz von Wasserstoff für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) entwickelt. Das Projekt will beweisen, und von synthetischen Kraftstoffen eine interessante Option. dass selbstständig fahrende Kleinbusse vollständig in den Über diese Fragen sprechen Dr. Joachim Damasky vom VDA und Straßenverkehr und den ÖPNV einer Metropole integriert werden IAV-Geschäftsführer Matthias Kratzsch im automotion-Interview können. Eine dreiwöchige Testphase im August verlief sehr erfolg- ab Seite 24. reich, und im Februar 2020 folgt bereits der nächste Schritt: Dann wird HEAT mit maximal 25 Kilometern pro Stunde autonom Weitere Themen in dieser Ausgabe: Schadensanalysen von me- durch die HafenCity fahren.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Skoda Auto 2008
    SIMPLY CLEVER ŠkodaAuto ANNUAL REPORT 2008 PEOPLE BEHIND ŠKODA We stand on firm foundations built over a long history and tradition of automobile manufacturing. We offer attractive, functional, practical, and elegant vehicles at a high level of quality. We managed to further reinforce our positions in key world markets in 2008, despite the ongoing financial crisis. We are well prepared to meet growing competitive pressures and the knowledge and innovation of our people give us the strength and capacity to successfully face the risks and challenges to come. ŠKODA AUTO A COMPANY WITH A TRADITION AND A FUTURE 67.5 percent of total Škoda Auto Group sales volume was realized on European Union markets. 200.2 billion CZK was the total level of Škoda Auto Group revenues. 26,695 was the worldwide number of Škoda Auto Group employees at year end. 674,530 Škoda-brand vehicles were delivered to customers worldwide. 2,000,000th vehicle of the highly successful Škoda Octavia model line rolled off the assembly line in March. CONTENTS Selected Data and Financial Figures According to IFRS 3 Letter from the Chairman 4 2008 Milestones 6 Škoda Auto Group Profile 9 Who We Are 9 Whence We Come 11 Where We Stand 11 Product Portfolio 12 Statutory and Supervisory Boards of Škoda Auto 15 Board of Directors 15 Supervisory Board 20 Report of the Supervisory Board 22 Škoda Auto Corporate Governance 23 Declaration of Compliance with Codex of Corporate Governance Recommendations 23 Degree of Compliance with Codex of Corporate Governance Recommendations 23 Škoda Auto
    [Show full text]
  • Sanofi-Synthelabo Annual Report 2001
    annual report Contents Group profile page 1 Chaiman’s message page 3 Key figures page 6 Stock exchange information page 8 Corporate governance page 11 Management Committee page 12 Prioritizing R&D and growth so as to drive back disease Research and development page 16 Medicine portfolio page 22 International organization page 36 2001 Annual report 2001 Annual report Working for the long term, a company - which respects people and their environment Ethics page 46 page 50 Sanofi-Synthélabo Human resources policy Health Safety Environment policy page 54 This annual report was designed and produced by: The Sanofi-Synthélabo Corporate Communications and Finance Departments and the Harrison&Wolf Agency. Photo credits: Getty Images / Barry Rosenthal • Getty Images / Steve Rowell • INSERM / J.T. Vilquin • CNRS / F. Livolant • Photothèque Sanofi-Synthélabo • Photothèque Sanofi-Synthélabo Recherche Montpellier • Publicis Conseil / Adollo Fiori • Luc Benevello • Olivier Culmann • Michel Fainsilber • Vincent Godeau • Florent de La Tullaye • Patrick Lefevre • Gilles Leimdorfer • Martial Lorcet • Fleur Martin Laprade • Patrice Maurein • Bernadette Müller • Laurent Ortal • Harutiun Poladian Neto • Anne-Marie Réjior • Marie Simonnot • Denys Turrier • The photographs which illustrate this document feature Sanofi-Synthélabo employees: we would like to thank them for their contribution. 395 030 844 R.C.S. Paris Group Profile 2nd pharmaceutical group in France 7th pharmaceutical group in Europe One of the world’s top 20 pharmaceutical groups Four areas of specialization Sanofi-Synthélabo has a core group of four therapeutic areas: • Cardiovascular / thrombosis • Central nervous system • Internal medicine • Oncology This targeted specialization enables the group to be a significant player 2001 Annual report 2001 Annual report in each of these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2005 ANNUAL REPORT 2005 Chronik 2005 >>>
    V OLKSWAGEN AG ANNUAL REPORT 2005 ANNUAL REPORT 2005 REPORT ANNUAL chronik 2005 >>> key figures volkswagen group Volume Data 2005 2004 % Vehicle sales (units) 5,192,576 5,142,759 + 1.0 Production (units) 5,219,478 5,093,181 + 2.5 Employees at Dec. 31 344,902 342,502 + 0.7 Financial Data (IFRSs), € million 2005 20041) % Sales revenue 95,268 88,963 + 7.1 Operating profit before special items 3,143 2,037 + 54.3 Special items 351 395 – 11.1 Operating profit after special items 2,792 1,642 + 70.0 Profit before tax 1,722 1,088 + 58.2 Profit after tax 1,120 697 + 60.7 Cash flows from operating activities 10,810 11,457 – 5.6 Cash flows from investing activities 10,466 15,078 – 30.6 Automotive Division2) Cash flows from operating activities 8,112 8,881 – 8.7 Cash flows from investing activities 5,721 7,046 – 18.8 of which: investments in property, plant and equipment 4,316 5,425 – 20.4 as a percentage of sales revenue 5.0 6.8 capitalized development costs 1,432 1,501 – 4.6 as a percentage of sales revenue 1.7 1.9 Net cash flow 2,391 1,835 + 30.3 Net liquidity at Dec. 31 706 – 1,912 x Return ratios in % 2005 20041) Return on sales before tax 1.8 1.2 Return on investment after tax (Automotive Division) 2.6 1.3 Return on equity before tax (Financial Services Division) 18.9 20.0 1) Restated. 2) Including allocation of consolidation adjustments between the Automotive and Financial Services divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Societal Risk Perception by Laypersons Living in Venezuela
    Societal risk perception by laypersons living in Venezuela. A Latin countries comparison* La percepción de riesgo social por laicos que viven en Venezuela. Una comparación entre países Latinos Received: 23 July 2015 | Accepted: 01 December 2015 Ana Gabriela Guédez** Universidad de Jean Jaurès, Francia ABSTRACT The present study presents the mean risk magnitude judgments on 91 activities, substances, and technologies expressed by Venezuelan adults living in the two main cities of this country: Caracas and Maracaibo. These judgments were compared methodically with findings on other samples of previous studies, namely four other Latin countries: France, Spain, Brazil, and Portugal. The aim of this study was to structure the cross-country differences in risk perception between the aforementioned countries and Venezuela using cluster analysis. A 91-hazard x 5 country matrix was created. Two main clusters were found. The Economically and Socially Challenging group (Venezuela and Portugal) and the Western Europe group (France and Spain). Brazil was situated closer to the **Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva. E-mail: Venezuelan and Portugal cluster than was the Western Europe group. [email protected] The common denominator in the Economically and Socially Challenging group can be the economic and social problems that both of these countries struggle against. It was reasonable that Brazil was closer to this cluster, given its similarities to both countries (in geographical and cultural terms). More explanations for these clusters were presented in the discussion. Finally, some recommendations and limitations are also presented and more research in this field is suggested as well. Keywords risk perception, social psychology, latin countries, Venezuela.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Low Carbon Automotive Directory
    UK Low Carbon Automotive Directory UK Trade & Investment is the Government department that helps Contents Introduction 3 UK based companies succeed in an About this directory 4 UK Trade & Investment 5 increasingly global economy. BIS: The Department for Growth 6 Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership 7 Low Carbon Know How 8 Cenex 9 Our range of expert services is Government/NGOs/Trade and Stakeholder Bodies 10 tailored to the needs of individual Academic Research 16 Development 23 businesses to maximise their Production/Manufacture 38 Consultants 58 international success. We provide Training and Qualifications 69 Aftermarket 71 companies with knowledge, advice Matrix of UK Low Carbon Vehicle Capabilities 74 and practical support. UK Low Carbon Automotive Directory Page 2 Introduction Low carbon is the only game in town. This is true From decades of experience, the UK automotive for every nation and for every major industry, not supply chain has built up great business acumen, least the automotive industry which, for decades, contributing to outstanding performance. Partnership in has given us the many and considerable benefits international business is something that comes naturally that come from motorised road transport. And now, to our companies and the UK government supports the automotive sector is again leading the way in that by providing one of the most business-enabled developing low-carbon technologies to ensure that environments in the world. The UK is open for business future generations can continue to enjoy those benefits. and welcomes overseas investment in our low-carbon industries. In 2010, again, the Ernst & Young European The low carbon automotive sector has made Attractiveness Survey found that the UK was the best breathtaking strides in recent years and now promises destination in Europe for foreign direct investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Škodaauto ANNUAL REPORT 2006
    SIMPLY CLEVER MORE ROOM... ŠkodaAuto ANNUAL REPORT 2006 ...FOR REVIEW Even in the dynamic life of an automotive manufacturer there are moments of genuflection, moments in which to stop and size up the situation. And also to look back, because the present is always a product of the past. Our look in the rear-view mirror is a pleasant one: we see ten million customers that have purchased a Škoda-brand vehicle from the commencement of production until the present day. Contents MORE ROOM FOR REVIEW Selected Data and Financial Figures According to IFRS 3 Letter from the Chairman 4 Milestones in 2006 6 Škoda Auto Group Profile 7 Statutory and Supervisory Bodies of Škoda Auto 10 Report of the Supervisory Board 15 MORE ROOM FOR GROWTH Report on the Operations of ŠKODA AUTO a.s. and Škoda Auto Group 18 Development of the Economy 18 Risk Management System 21 Financial Situation 22 Technical Development 28 Purchasing 31 MORE ROOM FOR CHALLENGES Production and Logistics 34 Quality 37 Sales and Marketing 38 MORE ROOM FOR LIFE Human Resources 44 Sponsorship and Corporate Citizenship 47 Organisation and Information Systems 48 The Environment 49 MORE ROOM FOR THE FUTURE Short-term Outlook 54 Financial Section 56 Auditor’s Report on the Annual Report and the Report on Relations 57 Auditor’s Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements 58 Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2006 59 Auditor’s Report on the Separate Financial Statements 96 Separate Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2006 97 Report on Relations 130 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 135 Persons Responsible for the Annual Report and Post-Balance Sheet Events 137 Business Results in Review 138 List of non-consolidated capital holdings of ŠKODA AUTO a.s.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual and Sustainability Report 2017 of Porsche AG
    SCAN THIS CHART – how to use the augmented reality options Performance. Augmented reality makes the fascination of Porsche an even more intense experience. Annual and Simply download the Porsche Newsroom app from the App Sustainability Report Store or Google Play, select the of Porsche AG augmented reality function in the menu and look out for the 2017 labels SCAN THIS CHART and SCAN THIS PAGE. View the labelled tables, diagrams and pages on the screen of your smartphone or tablet – and SCAN bring the content to life. THIS CHART Performance. Letter from the Executive Board of Porsche AG 6 Living sustainably is an overarching strategic You have before you two volumes: Perspective Important events 8 target for Porsche. For us, economic success, is intended to inspire, stimulate and motivate Business performance 18 ecological awareness and social responsibility you – to confront, challenge and familiarise Outlook 26 are not contradictions. On the contrary, when you with the topics and theories that an auto­ combined, they form a whole which defines motive company like Porsche must address in Sustainability strategy and sustainability management 28 the company’s attitude times of industrial system upheaval. Strategy and organisation 30 Stakeholder management 34 Economic success distinguishes Porsche – as What will identity mean in future? This is the Our way – management approaches in our action areas 40 does social compatibility. Precisely as a man u­ overriding question which Porsche already facturer of exclusive, high­performance sports has to consider today. Alongside inspiration Employees, society, sport 50 cars, Porsche regards itself as being obliged is information – about Porsche’s philoso­ Employees 52 to enhance the acceptance of the company and phy in the interplay between digitalisation, Society 60 its products worldwide by means of socially connectivity and electrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint of Paice Llc and Abell Foundation, Inc
    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436 In the Matter of Investigation CERTAIN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES No. 337-TA­ AND COMPONENTS THEREOF COMPLAINT OF PAICE LLC AND ABELL FOUNDATION, INC. UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930. AS AMENDED COMPLAINANTS: PROPOSED RESPONDENTS: Paice LLC Volkswagen AG 11I South Calvert Street, Suite 2310 Brieffach I849 Baltimore, MD 21202 D-38436 Wolfsburg Tel: (410) 539-1007 Germany Tel: +49-5361-9-0 Abel] Foundation, Inc. I I I South Calvert Street, Suite 2300 Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Baltimore, MD 21202 ' 2200 Ferdinand Porsche Dr. Tel: (410)547-1300 Herndon, VA 20171 Tel: 703-364-7000 COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANTS: Dr. lng. H.C. F. Porsche AG Ruffin B. Cordell Porscheplatz 1 Linda Liu Kordziel D-70435 Stuttgart Ahmed J. Davis Germany Thomas S. Fusco Tel: +49-711911-0 Brian J. Livedalen FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. 1425 K Street NW, Suite 1100 980 Hammond Drive, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20005 Atlanta, GA 30328 Tel: (202) 783-5070 Tel: (610) 252-5747 Fax: (202)783-2331 Audi AG Ettinger Stral3e D-85045, Ingolstadt Germany V ' Tel: +49-084189-0 Audi of America, LLC 2200 Ferdinand Porsche Dr. Herndon, VA 20171 Tel: 703-364-7000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ .. A. OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... .. B. PAICE AND ABELL BACKGROUND .............................................................
    [Show full text]