DOCSLIB.ORG

Austria 2016/22

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IMPEL REVIEW INITIATIVE (IRI) “A voluntary scheme for reporting and offering advice to environmental authorities” Report on the IRI that took place in Graz from 14 to 17 June 2016 at the Burg Graz Draft version 3.0 Page 1 Title report: Number report: IRI Austria 2016/22 Project managers: Report adopted at IMPEL General Tony Liebregts (NL) and Michael Schubert Assembly: Author: Number of pages: Rob Kramers and Birna Guttormsdottir Report: 49 Annexes: 8 Tony Liebregts (team leader), Rob Kramers (rapporteur), Birna Guttormsdóttir (rapporteur), Horst Büther, Florin Homorean, Martine Blondeel, Lenka Nemcová, Romano Ruggeri Executive summary: The IRI took place from 14 to 17 June 2016 in Graz. Besides the interviews that were held at the Burg Graz also a site visit to a Stölzle – Oberglas GmbH facility was undertaken during the IRI. The scope of the IRI was on environmental inspection at IED installation by the Province of Styria and the competent authority (District Authority). Never the less some conclusions, good practices and opportunities for the developments were also addressed on the permitting process. The IRI team admired the thorough preparation of the IRI by the colleagues of Styria and their open communication with the team. Although a number of opportunities of developments have been identified the team agreed that all ingredients are in place to be able to comply to the RMCEI and the IED (art 23). Further streamlining of procedures, tasks and legislation would only be needed for a very successful implementation. The most important opportunities of development are: - To enhance the role of the Province regarding environmental inspections - To change the steps and procedures for planning of inspections - To develop handbooks, guidance and training plan for the coordinators (inspectors) - To strengthen the role of the coordinator (inspector) regarding the environmental inspections. Let them act more as an inspector than a coordinator Disclaimer: This report is the result of a project within the IMPEL network. The content does not necessarily represent the view of the national administrations. Page 2 Introduction to IMPEL The European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law (IMPEL) is an international non-profit association of the environmental authorities of the EU Member States, acceding and candidate countries of the European Union and EEA countries. The association is registered in Belgium and its legal seat is in Bruxelles, Belgium. IMPEL was set up in 1992 as an informal Network of European regulators and authorities concerned with the implementation and enforcement of environmental law. The Network’s objective is to create the necessary impetus in the European Community to make progress on ensuring a more effective application of environmental legislation. The core of the IMPEL activities concerns awareness raising, capacity building and exchange of information and experiences on implementation, enforcement and international enforcement collaboration as well as promoting and supporting the practicability and enforceability of European environmental legislation. During the previous years, IMPEL has developed into a considerable, widely known organisation, being mentioned in a number of EU legislative and policy documents, e.g. the 6th Environment Action Programme and the Recommendation on Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections. The expertise and experience of the participants within IMPEL make the network uniquely qualified to work on both technical and regulatory aspects of EU environmental legislation. Information on the IMPEL Network is also available through its website at www.impel.eu. Page 3 Table of contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. The IRI Scheme ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Purpose of the IRI ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Scope of the IRI in Austria (Graz) ...................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Structure ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Part A – Regulatory framework of environmental protection in Austria / Styria. ............................. 7 2.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Institutions ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Legislation ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Environmental policy ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.4. Implementation of the IED directive .............................................................................................. 12 2.5. Styria ............................................................................................................................................... 15 2.6. Coordinators of directorate 15 ....................................................................................................... 19 2.7. The formal experts of directorate 15 ............................................................................................. 20 2.8. External interaction ........................................................................................................................ 22 3. Part C – Performing inspection tasks (Environmental Inspection Cycle) ......................................... 23 3.1. Planning of inspections ................................................................................................................... 24 2.1. Execution framework ..................................................................................................................... 27 2.2. Execution and reporting ................................................................................................................. 28 2.3. Performance monitoring ................................................................................................................ 32 4. Part D – Site visit ........................................................................................................................... 33 5. Summary of findings ..................................................................................................................... 38 5.1. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 38 5.2. Good practices ................................................................................................................................ 39 5.3. Opportunities of development ....................................................................................................... 40 Annex 1: Environmental Inspection Cycle .............................................................................................. 42 Annex 2: Terms of Reference for IMPEL project ..................................................................................... 43 Page 4 1. Introduction 1.1. The IRI Scheme The IRI scheme is a voluntary scheme providing for informal reviews of environmental authorities in IMPEL Member countries. It was set up to implement the European Parliament and Council Recommendation (2001/331/EC) providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections (RMCEI), where it states: “Member States should assist each other administratively in operating this Recommendation. The establishment by Member States in cooperation with IMPEL of reporting and advice schemes relating to inspectorates and inspection procedures would help to promote best practice across the Community.” 1.2. Purpose of the IRI The aims of the IRI are to: • Provide advice to environmental authorities seeking an external review of their structure, operation or performance by experts from other IMPEL member countries for the purpose of benchmarking and continuous improvement of their organisation; • Encourage capacity building in environmental authorities in IMPEL member countries; • Encourage the exchange of experience and collaboration between these authorities on common issues and problems; • Spread good practice leading to improved quality of the work of environmental authorities and contributing to continuous improvement of quality and consistency of application of environmental law across IMPEL member countries (˝the level playing field˝). The IRI is an informal review, not an audit process. The IRI is intended to enable the environmental authority and review team to explore how the authority carries out its tasks. It aims at identifying areas of good practice for dissemination together with opportunities to develop existing practice within the authority and authorities in other IMPEL member countries. 1.3. Scope of the IRI in Austria (Graz) The IRI uses a questionnaire to review the environmental authority against the requirements of the RMCEI and the IED. The IMPEL
Recommended publications
  • The Empire in the Provinces: the Case of Carinthia

    The Empire in the Provinces: the Case of Carinthia

    religions Article The Empire in the Provinces: The Case of Carinthia Helmut Konrad Institut für Geschichte, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Attemsgasse 8/II, [505] 8010 Graz, Austria; [email protected] Academic Editors: Malachi Hacohen and Peter Iver Kaufman Received: 16 May 2016; Accepted: 1 August 2016; Published: 5 August 2016 Abstract: This article examines the legacy of the Habsburg Monarchy in the First Austrian Republic, both in the capital, Vienna, and in the province of Carinthia. It concludes that Social Democracy, often cited as one of the six ingredients that held the old Empire together, took on distinct forms in the Republic’s different federal states. The scholarly literature on the post-1918 “heritage” of the Monarchy therefore needs to move beyond monolithic generalizations and toward regionally focused comparative studies. Keywords: empire; socialism; Jews; Habsburg Monarchy; Austria; Vienna; Carinthia; German Nationalism; Sprachenkampf 1. Introduction Which forms did the ideas take that allowed the Habsburg monarchy to persist, despite the diversity of nationalisms present in the small Republic of German-Austria, for so long after the end of the First World War? What was the “glue” that held this multiethnic empire together, when its collapse had been predicted since 1848, and which of its elements continued to exist beyond 1918? How was this heritage expressed in the different regions of the new republic? At least six factors can be identified as ingredients of the “glue” that held the monarchy together: first, the Emperor, a figure who symbolized the fusion of the complex linguistic, ethnic and religious components of the Habsburg state; second, the administrative officials, who were loyal to the Emperor and worked in the ubiquitous and even architecturally similar buildings of the Monarchy’s district authorities and train stations; third, the army, whose members promoted the imperial ideals through their long terms of service and acknowledged linguistic diversity.
  • 2Nd Report by the Republic of Austria

    2Nd Report by the Republic of Austria

    Strasbourg, 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 [English only] SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY AUSTRIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I...................................................................................................................................5 I.1. General Remarks..............................................................................................................5 I.2. Comments on the Questions and the Resolution of the Council of Europe ........................7 PART II ...............................................................................................................................17 II.1. The Situation of the National Minorities in Austria .......................................................17 II.1.1. The History of the National Minorities .......................................................................18 The Croat minority in Burgenland ........................................................................................18 The Slovene minority ...........................................................................................................19 The Hungarian minority .......................................................................................................21 The Czech minority..............................................................................................................21 The Slovak minority.............................................................................................................22
  • Burgenland-Roma

    Burgenland-Roma

    Data » Ethnology and Groups » Roma in Austria » Burgenland-Roma http://romani.uni-graz.at/rombase Burgenland-Roma Romani-Project The Roma residing in present Burgenland, which is the furthest east of the nine Austrian federal states, and borders with Hungary, belong to the group whose members are called Ungrian Roma, → Ungrika-Roma or Romungri in older literature. This group living in the western region of Hungarian influence, ranging from southern Slovakia to northern Slovenia, are characterised by their long-term settlement and, consequently, by a strong Hungarian influence in their culture. History At the end of the 14th century, Roma are first mentioned in western Hungary, to which today’s Burgenland belonged at that time. From the beginning of the 15th century, larger Roma groups started entering the Pannonic border area of western Hungary. Most likely due to the fact that they served in the war as soldiers and blacksmiths, the Roma were at first tolerated and to a certain extent even supported by some of the Hungarian nobility. This favourable condition lead to the first settlements: in the second half of the 17th century, there is documentary evidence of the founding of villages under Christoph Batthyány. In contrast to the liberal Battyány, who controlled southern Burgenland, the Esterházy of northern Burgenland expelled the Roma from their area of influence. This contrast characterises the situation of the Roma at that time as one situated somewhere between acceptance and discrimination. After the end of the Osmanic Reign in 1688, the situation of the Roma living in western Hungary changed. The law was laid down that they were to be banned from the country.
  • Report Name:Elisabeth Koestinger Again Austrian Minister

    Report Name:Elisabeth Koestinger Again Austrian Minister

    Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: January 31,2020 Report Number: AU2020-0001 Report Name: Elisabeth Koestinger Again Austrian Minister Responsible for Agriculture Country: Austria Post: Vienna Report Category: Agricultural Situation, Agriculture in the News Prepared By: Roswitha Krautgartner Approved By: Emily Scott Report Highlights: On January 7, 2020, Elisabeth Köstinger from the Austrian Peoples’ Party (ÖVP) was sworn in as Minister responsible for the agriculture portfolio in the newly formed ÖVP - Greens Party coalition government. Köstinger is heading the Ministry of Agriculture, Regions, and Tourism. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY New “Old” Austrian Minister Responsible for Agriculture Köstinger Elisabeth Köstinger, Minister for Agriculture, Regions, and Tourism Elisabeth (“Elli”) Köstinger from the Austrian Peoples’ Party (ÖVP) again took over the agricultural agenda in the new government as Minister of Agriculture, Regions, and Tourism. (NOTE: Austria changes the name - and portfolio - of their ministries with every new government). The Ministry of Agriculture is now officially the Ministry of Agriculture, Regions, and Tourism, where it was previously known as the Ministry of Sustainability and Tourism.) Köstinger previously served Minister of Sustainability and Tourism also covering for agriculture during the ÖVP - Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) government 2017-2018. Köstinger was the first Austrian female Agriculture Minister. She is a well-known expert in Austrian and European agricultural and environmental policy. Before her position as Agriculture Minister she was a member of the European parliament. Köstinger is a close confidant of head of the ÖVP, Sebastian Kurz, and played a major role during the coalition negotiations.
  • S-GRA2 Mobility

    S-GRA2 Mobility

    Rural-Urban Outlooks: Unlocking Synergies (ROBUST) ROBUST receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 727988.* August 2018 Federal Institute for Mountainous and Less-Favoured Areas Lisa Bauchinger [email protected] Snapshot: Expressions of Urban – Peri-Urban – Rural Relationships Analysing regional mobility in the Metropolitan Area of Styria Metropolotian Area of Styria, Austria 1. Brief Description The three-year INTERREG Central Europe project “Peripheral Access” (2017 – 2020) involves nine partners from seven European countries with regional case studies in each of these countries, including the Metropolitan Area of Styria in Austria. The main objective of the project is to improve mobility patterns in rural areas. In order to achieve this goal, the project focuses on integrating transport modes through multimodal mobility points, new ways to employ Intelligent Technology Systems (ITS) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in transport and smart mobility. Moreover, it aims to enhance institutional cooperation between transport authorities and to implement cross-border marketing approaches. Therefore, each partner region conducts an analysis of the status quo of the regional mobility patterns for further development of the supply and the comparability of case study regions. The first progress-report of the case study (Verkehrsplus 2018) serves as the basis for this rapid appraisal of project approach and findings. The analysis of the mobility patterns in the Metropolitan Area of Styria concentrates on the peripheral areas of the region, in the districts Graz-Umgebung (surrounding area of Graz) and Voitsberg. The city of Graz is included only indirectly by analysing the transport links from and out of the city.
  • Bezirkswahlbehörde Deutschlandsberg KUNDMACHUNG

    Bezirkswahlbehörde Deutschlandsberg KUNDMACHUNG

    Bezirkswahlbehörde Deutschlandsberg KUNDMACHUNG Die Bezirkswahlbehörde Deutschlandsberg für die Landwirtschaftskammerwahlen 2021 veröffentlicht gemäß § 33 der Landwirtschaftskammer-Wahlordnung 2005, LGBl. Nr. 90, idgF., nachstehend die Namen der von den Wählergruppen vorge- schlagenen KandidatInnen für die Bezirkskammer für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Deutschlandsberg Liste 1 Steirischer Bauernbund STBB 1 Polz Christian, 1973, Landwirt, 8523 Frauental a. d. L. 2 Silly Franz, 1970, Weinbauer, 8543 St. Martin i. S. 3 Strohrigl Heidemarie, 1959, Landwirtin, 8521 Wettmannstätten 4 Harzl Karl, 1966, Landwirt, 8510 Stainz 5 Temmel Franz, 1973, Landwirt, 8554 Eibiswald 6 Weißensteiner Brigitte, 1974, Landwirtin, 8510 Stainz 7 Wechtitsch Erich, 1968, Landwirt, 8552 Eibiswald 8 Rossmann Florian, 1985 Landwirt, 8553 Eibiswald 9 Haring Peter, 1979, Landwirt, 8521 Wettmannstätten 10 Fuchs Sandra Maria, 1981, Landwirtin, 8522 Groß St. Florian 11 Klug Stefan, 1988, Landwirt, 8511 St. Stefan ob Stainz 12 Wallner Franz-Josef, 1994, Landwirt, 8522 Groß St. Florian 13 Peter Andreas, 1978, Landwirt, 8541 Bad Schwanberg 14 Gegg Johann, 1969, Tischlermeister, 8541 Bad Schwanberg 15 Schuster Andreas, 1977, Landwirt, 8551 Wies 16 Fellner Stephan, 1983, Landwirt, 8523 Frauental a. d. L. 17 Koch Georg, 1973, Landwirt, 8543 St. Martin i. S. 18 Mandl Manfred, 1970, Landwirt, 8524 Deutschlandsberg 19 Gamper Günter, 1971, Land- u. Forstwirt, 8503 Lannach 20 Pongratz Gerhard, 1993, Landwirt, 8544 Pölfing-Brunn 21 Stangl Andreas, 1965, Landwirt, 8504 Preding 22 Gaisch Johann, 1967, Landwirt, 8542 St. Peter i. S. 23 Malli Monika, 1970, Landwirtin, 8553 Eibiswald 24 Kölbl Wolfgang, 1973, Landwirt, 8511 St. Stefan ob Stainz 25 Pistolnig Franz, 1969, Landwirt, 8522 Groß St. Florian 26 Gegg Stefan, 1970, Landwirt, 8541 Bad Schwanberg 27 Hofer Stefan, 1969, Landwirt, 8523 Frauental a.
  • Report of the European Commission of Human Rights Would Be Made Available to the Committee of Ministers As Soon As Possible

    Report of the European Commission of Human Rights Would Be Made Available to the Committee of Ministers As Soon As Possible

    COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONSEIL DE L' EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS ^5th session Strasbourg, Confidential CM (69) PV M- MINUTES of the sitting held on 12 December 1969 at 10 a.m., CMPV013 at OECD Headquarters, 19 rue de Franqueville, Paris PRESENT; MM. K. Waldheim AUSTRIA P. Harmel BELGIUM S. Kypr ianou CYPRUS P. Hartling DENMARK J. de Lipkowski (1) PRANCE V7;- Scheel FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF- GERMANY P. Pipinelis GREECE H.S. Bjornsson (2) ICELAND . P.J. Hillery IRELAND D. Coppo (J>) • ITALY V. (1) Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, replacing Mr. M. Schumann, Minister for Foreign Affairs. (2) Ambassador Extraordinary- and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Iceland to the Council of Europe, replacing Mr. E. Jonsson, Minister for Foreign Affairs. (J') Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, replacing Mr. A. Moro, Minister for Foreign Affairs (Chairman). 16.257 02.2/11 CM (69) PV ^• - 2 - MM. G. Thorn LUXEMBOURG G. Borg Olivier- MALTA P.J. Gelderman (1) NETHERLANDS G. Lyng NORWAY T. Nilsson' SWEDEN W. Spuhler SWITZERLAND I.S. 9a£layangil TURKEY- -••"-• G. Thorns on (2) UNITED. KINGDOM L. Toncic-Sorinj Secretary General S. Sforza Deputy Secretary General H. Leleu Director of Political Affairs H. Beesley Secretary-of the Committee of Ministers Mr. A. MORO,-. the Italian Minister for Foreign Affairs, took the Chair at 10 a.m. The Chairman declared open the- M-5th session .of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. After congratulating Mr. Toncic-Sorinj on his election as Secretary General and paying tribute to his qualities, he called him to make his solemn declaration in accordance with the Statute.
  • START up INFORMATION City/Partnership Metropolitan Area

    START up INFORMATION City/Partnership Metropolitan Area

    START UP INFORMATION City/Partnership Metropolitan Area Styria – Graz & Surroundings Contact Dr. Bernd Gassler, Metropolitan Area Styria; [email protected] Project Urban – Rural Cooperation Cooperation Thematic Area Concrete Challenge Faced Mobility, Land use management The main challenges are to overcome the urban sprawl, to avoid sealing, to minimize emission and to promote sustainable and alternative mobility solutions. Because of demographic challenges (population decline in the periphery areas and population growth in the urban and suburban areas) the region must ensure appropriate measures. SHORT SUMARY OF THE CITY’S CONTEXT The functional, economic and demographic centre of Styria is known as its “metropolitan area” and is characterized by both urbanity and rural areas. It includes the City of Graz and the districts Graz-Surrounding & Voitsberg. With its 52 municipalities it covers about 1.900 km². Approximately 487.000 inhabitants live in the region, this leads to an average population density of 257 IN/km2 (City of Graz included). Regarding the single values in the two districts Voitsberg and Graz-Umgebung, the population density varies from 20 IN/km2 in very rural areas to 100 IN/km2 in peripheral-rural and 600 IN/km2 in (sub)-urban municipalities in the south of Graz. Beside the City of Graz there are two sub centres in the western part of the area: the cities Koeflach & Voitsberg. Referring to the geographical framework, the area is embedded in the south eastern alpine foothills, not far from the border between Austria and Slovenia. The northern and eastern transition zone of the city region of Graz is affected by a relatively abrupt switchover from urban to rural areas once from a topographic and twice from a functional point.
  • Der Neue Öffentliche KINDERSPIELPLATZ

    Der Neue Öffentliche KINDERSPIELPLATZ

    MärzMäMärzrz 2019200119 1 Zugestellt durch Post.at Kostenlose amtliche Information Nr. 2 / 2019 Verlagspostamt 8522 der Marktgemeinde Groß St. Florian Juni Der neue öffentliche KINDERSPIELPLATZ )RWRÁLHJHQGH.DPHUD²&KULVWLDQ)UH\GO 2 Juni 2019 Der Bürgermeister informiert iebe Florianerinnen und Florianer! gierten zu den einzelnen Verbänden und L Vor der Urlaubszeit wende ich $XVVFKVVHQJHlQGHUWZHUGHQ PLFK ZLHGHU DQ HXFK ,Q JHZRKQWHU O Der Gemeinderat hat über eine kostenlose Entsor- Weise berichte ich über die wichtigs- gung von WindelnEHUDWHQ%HVFKORVVHQZXUGHGDVV WHQ(UHLJQLVVHLQGHU0DUNWJHPHLQGH den )DPLOLHQ PLW .OHLQNLQGHUQ XQG PLW 3ÁHJHSHU- sonen kostenlos Windelsäcke zur Verfügung gestellt YRQBgm. Alois Resch ZHUGHQ 'LH $EJDEHQPHQJH LVW YRUHUVW PLW 6WFN EHVFKUlQNW'DPLW6LHGLHVH:LQGHOVlFNH]XJHZLHVHQ Beschlüsse des Gemeinderates EHNRPPHQ PVVHQ 6LH YRUKHU HLQHQ $QWUDJ VWHOOHQ ROJHQGH%HVFKOVVHZXUGHQLQGHU*HPHLQGHUDWV- 'LHVH $QWUlJH N|QQHQ 6LH EHUHLWV LP 0DUNWJHPHLQ- FVLW]XQJ DP 0lU] JHIDVVW ZREHL ZLHGHU deamt ausfüllen! sämtliche Beschlüsse einstimmig erfolgten: O 'HU2EPDQQYRP3UIXQJVDXVVFKXVV+HUU*5-RKDQQ O 'D +HUU *5 -DNRE 6FKPLWW ]XUFNJHWUHWHQ LVW ZXUGH -|EVWOKDWLQGLHVHU6LW]XQJEHUGLHhEHUSUIXQJGHV +HUU .DUO 6WURKPDLHU DOV *HPHLQGHUDW DQJHOREW (QWZXUIHV GHV 5HFKQXQJVDEVFKOXVVHV EHULFKWHW $Q- 'DKHU PXVVWH DXFK GLH =XVDPPHQVHW]XQJ GHU 'HOH- schließend wurde die Kassenführung für das Haus- haltsjahr 2018 entlastet. O %HVFKORVVHQZXUGHQGHURechnungsabschluss 2018 Inhaltsverzeichnis XQG GLH 5HFKQXQJVDEVFKOVVH GHU 9RONVVFKXOH Bericht des Bürgermeisters
  • Graz - Lieboch - Voitsberg - Köflach Gültig Ab 13

    Graz - Lieboch - Voitsberg - Köflach Gültig Ab 13

    700 Graz - Lieboch - Voitsberg - Köflach Gültig ab 13. Dezember 2020 Am 19. März (Josefitag) und an den Freitagen nach Christi Himmelfahrt und Fronleichnam Verkehr wie an schulfreien Werktagen Haltestelle Montag - Freitag (Werktag) Verkehrsbeschränkung F0 S0 F0 S0 Verkehrshinweis K Graz Hauptbahnhof ab 19:45 21:05 Graz Griesplatz ab 5:30 6:05 8:00 8:00 9:05 10:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:30 16:30 17:30 18:30 19:55 21:15 23:05 Graz Andreas-Hofer-Platz 23:08 Graz Elisabethinergasse 5:32 6:07 8:02 8:02 9:07 10:02 12:02 13:02 14:02 15:32 16:32 17:32 18:32 19:57 21:17 Graz Hauptbahnhof 23:13 Graz Lissagasse 5:33 6:08 8:03 8:03 9:08 10:03 12:03 13:03 14:03 15:33 16:33 17:33 18:33 19:58 21:18 Graz Don Bosco Bahnhof 5:34 6:09 8:04 8:04 9:09 10:04 12:04 13:04 14:04 15:34 16:34 17:34 18:34 19:59 21:19 23:17 Graz Don Bosco-Süd 5:35 6:10 8:05 8:05 9:10 10:05 12:05 13:05 14:05 15:35 16:35 17:35 18:35 20:00 21:20 23:18 Graz Niclas-Strobl-Weg 5:37 6:12 8:07 8:07 9:12 10:07 12:07 13:07 14:07 15:37 16:37 17:37 18:37 20:01 21:21 23:20 Graz Kapellenwirt 5:38 6:13 8:08 8:08 9:13 10:08 12:08 13:08 14:08 15:38 16:38 17:38 18:38 20:02 21:22 23:21 Graz Wagner-Jauregg-Straße 5:39 6:14 8:09 8:09 9:14 10:09 12:09 13:09 14:09 15:39 16:39 17:39 18:39 20:03 21:23 23:22 Graz P+R Webling 5:40 6:15 8:10 8:10 9:15 10:10 12:10 13:10 14:10 15:40 16:40 17:40 18:40 20:04 21:24 23:23 Graz Schwarzer Weg 5:41 6:16 8:11 8:11 9:16 10:11 12:11 13:11 14:11 15:41 16:41 17:41 18:41 20:05 21:25 23:24 Graz Weiberfelderweg 5:41 6:16 8:11 8:11 9:16 10:11 12:11 13:11 14:11 15:41 16:41 17:41
  • Austrian Federalism in Comparative Perspective

    Austrian Federalism in Comparative Perspective

    CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | VOLUME 24 Bischof, Karlhofer (Eds.), Williamson (Guest Ed.) • 1914: Aus tria-Hungary, the Origins, and the First Year of World War I War of World the Origins, and First Year tria-Hungary, Austrian Federalism in Comparative Perspective Günter Bischof AustrianFerdinand Federalism Karlhofer (Eds.) in Comparative Perspective Günter Bischof, Ferdinand Karlhofer (Eds.) UNO UNO PRESS innsbruck university press UNO PRESS innsbruck university press Austrian Federalism in ŽŵƉĂƌĂƟǀĞWĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞ Günter Bischof, Ferdinand Karlhofer (Eds.) CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | VOLUME 24 UNO PRESS innsbruck university press Copyright © 2015 by University of New Orleans Press All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage nd retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, LA 138, 2000 Lakeshore Drive. New Orleans, LA, 70148, USA. www.unopress.org. Printed in the United States of America Book design by Allison Reu and Alex Dimeff Cover photo © Parlamentsdirektion Published in the United States by Published and distributed in Europe University of New Orleans Press by Innsbruck University Press ISBN: 9781608011124 ISBN: 9783902936691 UNO PRESS Publication of this volume has been made possible through generous grants from the the Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration, and Foreign Affairs in Vienna through the Austrian Cultural Forum in New York, as well as the Federal Ministry of Economics, Science, and Research through the Austrian Academic Exchange Service (ÖAAD). The Austrian Marshall Plan Anniversary Foundation in Vienna has been very generous in supporting Center Austria: The Austrian Marshall Plan Center for European Studies at the University of New Orleans and its publications series.
  • Deutschlandsberg

    Deutschlandsberg

    Deutschlandsberg (DL; B603) WIBIS Steiermark Factsheet Bezirksprofil Autoren: Beate Friedl, Karolin Gstinig, Dominik Janisch, Nicholas Katz, Eric Kirschner, Andreas Niederl LÄNDLICHER BEZIRK MIT INDUSTRIELLER TRADITION :: ELekTRONIK UND FAHRZEUGBAU Bevölkerung Arbeit Wirtschaft Demografie 2018 Beschäftigung 2018 Betriebe/Unternehmen 2018 DL Stmk. Rang1 DL Stmk. Rang Betriebe4 Beschäftigte5 Einwohner (01.01.2018) 60.734 1.240.214 10 Unselbstständig Beschäftigte 20.386 512.395 11 Arbeitergeberbetriebe 1.620 100,0 % Trend Ø2014-2018 0,1 % 0,5 % 5 Trend 2017-2018 2,6 % 3,2 % 10 Kleinstbetriebe (1-9 Beschäftigte) 1.294 16,9 % Prognose 2018-2030 -1,2 % 2,2 % 5 Trend Frauen 2017-2018 3,5 % 2,7 % 3 Kleinbetriebe (10-49 Beschäftigte) 274 27,0 % Bevölkerungsanteil 4,9 % 100,0 % 10 Trend Männer 2017-2018 2,1 % 3,5 % 11 Mittelbetriebe (50-249 Beschäftigte) 43 19,8 % Geburtenquote2 8,0 9,2 10 Trend Ø2014-2018 2,5 % 2,0 % 3 Großbetriebe (ab 250 Beschäftigte) 9 36,3 % Sterbequote2 10,9 10,3 6 Beschäftigungsanteil 4,0 % 100,0 % 11 Wanderquote2 1,7 3,5 6 Industrie und wissensintensive Dienstleister Katasterfläche [km2] 863 16.399 10 Anteil an der Gesamtbeschäftigung DL Stmk. Rang Beschäftigungsstruktur Flächenanteil 5,3 % 100,0 % 10 Industrie (ÖNACE B-E): TOP 3 aus C6 40,1 % 22,7 % 1 …Fahrzeugbau, sonstiger Anteil Dauersiedlungsraum 41 % 32 % 7 9,9 % 3,0 % 1 Deutschlandsberg Steiermark Österreich Fahrzeugbau Einwohner / km2 Dauersiedl. 171 237 10 3,5 2,1 5,9 0,7 4,8 1,0 …Elektrotechnik und Elektronik 9,4 % 2,7 % 1 …Nahrungs-, Futtermittel-, Bevölkerungsprognose nach Altersgruppen (in %) 49,9 25,4 3,2 % 2,1 % 6 29,8 Getränkeherstellung u.