DOCSLIB.ORG

State Guarantee for Capital Borrowings by Coràs Iompair Eirann (CIÉ) for Infrastructure Investment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Guarantee for Capital Borrowings by Coràs Iompair Eirann (CIÉ) for Infrastructure Investment EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 07.VI.2006 C (2006)2095 final Subject: State aid No N 478/2004 – Ireland State guarantee for capital borrowings by Coràs Iompair Eirann (CIÉ) for infrastructure investment Sir, Procedure 1. By letter dated 10 September 2004, registered at the European Commission on 14 September 2004 (A/30519), the Irish authorities notified to the Commission, in accordance with Article 88 (3) of the EC Treaty, its intention to authorise the Minister for Finance to guarantee capital borrowings of up to € 800 million by Coràs Iompair Eirann (CIÉ)1 for infrastructure investment. The notification was registered under State aid case No. N 478/2004. 2. However, the notification was considered incomplete and by letter of 18 November 2004 (D/20889), the Commission requested the Irish authorities to provide additional information. The requested information was received by letter dated 21 June 2005, registered on 28 June 2005 (A/16124). 3. On 5 October 2005, a technical meeting between the Irish authorities and the Commission took place in Brussels, in the course of which the Commission requested further information. This information was received by the Commission on 17 February 2006 (A/14169). 1 Corás Iompair Eireann is a national statutory responsible for the provision of public transport in Ireland. Mr Dermot AHERN Ministry of Foreign Affairs St. Stephen's Green 80 Dublin 2 Ireland Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles – Belgique/Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel – België Telephone: 00-32 (0) 2 299 11.11. Facts General background 4. Ireland has one of the most limited rail networks in the EU. The National Development Plan (NDP) 2000-2006 seeked to address the deficiencies in Irish public transport and rail is made a priority. In particular, the Economic and Social Infrastructure Operational Programme (ESIOP), prepared within the framework of the NDP 2000-2006, set out, amongst others, the Government’s Public Transport Policy, which focuses on the development of the public transport infrastructure to provide for increased capacity and frequency of services. A key objective of this plan is to give Ireland a rail system up to the most modern EU standard. 5. In November 2005, the Irish Government launched Transport 21, which follows up on the NDP and addresses transport investment requirements for the next ten years, at an estimated cost of €34.4 billion. As far as CIE is concerned, the investments will concern mainly the Railway Development Plan. Beneficiary 6. CIÉ is the national statutory corporation entrusted with the provision of public transport in Ireland. It is wholly owned by the Irish Government. 7. CIÉ has three main subsidiaries established for operational purposes. Iarnród Eirann (Irish rail), Bus Eirann (Irish Bus) and Bus Átha Cliath (Dublin Bus). Each of these subsidiaries is a limited liability company, wholly owned by CIÈ. The notified measure relates exclusively to the activities of Iarnród Eirann. 8. Iarnród Eireann is active both as network operator and as railway undertaking. It owns the totality of the railway infrastructure in Ireland, and is currently the only undertaking providing rail services, both passengers and freight, in Ireland.23 The notified measure 9. Currently the Minister for Finance is empowered to guarantee borrowings by CIÉ of up to IR£ 250 million (approx. € 320 million) for any purpose.4 This guarantee was communicated by the Irish government to the Commission on 3 July 2000, in reply to a letter sent by the Commission to Ireland following the adoption of the Commission’s “Notice on the application of Article 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees. 2 Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings was transposed into Irish law by S.I. 238/1999. Nevertheless, to date no applications to run rail services in Ireland has been received by the relevant Irish authorities and today Einród Eireann is the only railway undertaking operating in Ireland. 3 The Dublin – Belfast “Enterprise” link is jointly operated by Iarnród Eureann and Northern Ireland Railways. On this link, only passenger service is offered. 4 Section 4 of the Transport Act 1974 in conjunction with Section 5 of the Transport Act 1964. 2 10. The notified measure will increase this guarantee with respect to investments into rail infrastructure and allow the Minister for Finance to guarantee capital borrowings by CIÉ for the purpose of capital investment in respect of railway infrastructure of up to € 800 million. 11. The increased guarantee will be provided for by an amendment to Section 5 of the Transport Act 1964, which will provide the following. “(1) The Board may from time to time borrow money, including money in a currency other than the currency of the State, to defray expenditure incurred by it that is properly chargeable to capital […]. (2) The aggregate at any one time of borrowings under this section which have not been repaid shall not exceed € 800,000,000. Without prejudice to the foregoing, the aggregate at any one time of borrowings which are not made for the purpose of capital investment in respect of railway infrastructure shall not exceed € 317,434,510.61 [being the equivalent of IR£ 250,000,000] (3) For the purpose of subsection (2), railway infrastructure shall be defined as comprising any land, buildings, structures, equipment, and systems, used in connection with, or necessary or incidental to, the railway.” 12. The guarantee in question will be provided to CIÉ free of charge and cover the borrowed amounts in full (100%). 13. The Guarantee will be administered at the level of central Government by the Department of Finance. 14. The Guarantee will be used to support borrowings raised in the open market according to open and non-discriminatory tendering procedures. A notice was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 15 October 2002 seeking expression of interest in providing CIÉ’s financial requirements for the next three years. Applicants were, in particular, required to demonstrate that they had the capacity, resources, experience and financial stability to provide the services required. Provided that all other terms of references are met, the relevant contract will be awarded to the lending institution that has quoted the lowest cost. 15. Iarnród Eireann has a small infrastructure construction department, which carries out standard maintenance work and minor up-grading of existing infrastructure, such as safety up-grades of level crossings. The department does, however, not have the resources to carry out major infrastructure work. 16. Accordingly, all major infrastructure work is procured on the construction market, through call for tenders published in the Official Journal of the European Union and adjudicated according to the relevant rules of EC public procurement law. 17. The infrastructure constructions which will be covered by the State guarantee consist in major infrastructure work. The vast majority of the works will thus be procured through tender procedure; minor works may be carried out by Iarnród Eireann in house construction department. 3 18. The projected investments in railway infrastructure under the National Development Plan and under Transport 21 relate to borrowings drawn down up to 31 December 2015. The repayment terms might stretch beyond that date; on the basis that CIÉ will repay the borrowings raised under the guarantee in the ten years subsequent to 2016, Ireland does not anticipate that it will grant authority to guarantee these loans beyond 2026. Objective of the measure 19. The objective of the notified measure is to assist CIÉ and Iarnród Eirann in raising the finance needed to implement the Railway Development Programme. Ireland has confirmed that the notified guarantee will not be used to support borrowings for any purposes other than investment in railway infrastructure, as set out in the Railway Development Plan. 20. Consequently, the capital borrowings made with support of the notified measure will only be used for the development, construction or upgrading of fixed assets in Ireland. 21. Einród Eireann is obliged to keep separate accounts with regard to costs, receipts and revenues related to activities in the areas of railway infrastructure operation, railway passenger operation and railway freight operations.5 In addition, it is obliged within the framework of separated accounts to keep independent accounts of activities covered from public funds and it may not redistribute between its different activities. Accounts for business relating to the provision of transport services and those for business relating to the management of railway infrastructure are kept separate.6 Public subsidies paid to either one of these two areas may not be transferred to the other. Appreciation of the measure 22. According to Article 87(1) EC Treaty, “any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the common market.” 23. It thus has to first to be assessed whether the measure the Irish government envisages constitute State aid in the sense of Article 87 (1), and then, should it constitute State aid, whether such an aid is compatible with the common market. Presence of State aid 24. The measure notified by the Irish government is a guarantee for loans which CIÉ takes out in order to co-finance investment into railway infrastructure. The measure can only constitute State aid if the construction of railway infrastructure is to be considered an economic activity, and thus the body carrying out this activity is to be considered an undertaking in the sense of Art. 87 (1) EC Treaty. 5 Article 10 of Act No 77/2002 6 In accordance with Article 6 of Directive 91/440 4 25.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issues Associated with Planning, Implementing, Managing and Operating Public Transport Projects in Ireland
    Urban Transport XIX 79 Issues associated with planning, implementing, managing and operating public transport projects in Ireland R. Byrne Murray1, M. Murphy1 & A. Ahern2 1College of Engineering and Built Environment, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland 2School of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland Abstract Whilst considering the context to which public transport is planned in Ireland and internationally, the research has been concerned with studying the methodology and the roles of key stakeholders for the planning, implementation, management and operation of public transport projects in order to gauge the efficiency and suitability of the Irish planning process in relation to our international counterparts The paper will present principal findings from structured interviews undertaken with key stakeholders involved in the Irish process and will provide a basis for debating the issues raised as a consequence of these interviews. Key issues raised include: 1) the possible complexity of the planning process in Ireland; 2) the role of political agendas in the decision making process; and 3) the governance and institutional arrangements for planning public transport projects in Ireland in contrast with other international countries. Keywords: public transport planning, institutional arrangements, governance, political agendas, public transport decision making, planning process, Irish planning, transport planning issues, stakeholders, planning complexities. 1 Introduction Whilst considering
    [Show full text]
  • Waterford Bypass
    ENGINEERS IRELAND WATERFORD BYPASS WATERFORD BYPASS JOHN T. MURPHY, BE, CEng, FIEI, HDipMM, RConsEI Project Director, Mott MacDonald Ireland JOE SHINKWIN, BE, CEng, MIEI, DipMechEng Project Manager, Mott MacDonald Ireland Presented to a meeting of the Cork Region of Engineers Ireland 23rd February 2010 SYNOPSIS The N25 Waterford Bypass comprises a 16.3 km of dual carriageway bypass of Waterford City, 9.5 km of major link roads and an additional 13 km of side roads. It includes a 465 metre long dual carriageway cable-stayed bridge over the River Suir (with a 230m main span), plus a number of major viaduct and grade separated interchange structures totalling over 50 bridges. This paper describes the development of the current route for the N25 Waterford Bypass including the various phases of route selection. It deals with the project’s inclusion as a pilot PPP project and the development of the PPP contract. It follows the project through the statutory processes (including the discovery of Viking remains and the need to find a new route around the designated national monument site in Woodstown). The paper also describes the selection of the chosen bridge type for the Suir River Crossing and looks at some of the other major structures. Finally, the paper will briefly describe the construction contract and various aspects of construction. 1 MURPHY and SHINKWIN INTRODUCTION crossing of the Suir in the Waterford viii) were evaluated without area would impose costs on, and quantification while items v), vi), and vii) The need for a second river crossing of produce benefits for, the community at were derived in the process of the the River Suir in Waterford has been large.
    [Show full text]
  • Galway County Development Board - Priority Actions 2009-2012
    Galway CDB Strategy 2009-2012, May 2009 Galway County Development Board - Priority Actions 2009-2012 Table of Contents Galway County Development Board ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Priority Actions 2009-2012.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Galway County Development Board........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Format of Report.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 1: Priority Strategy - Summary....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2 - Detailed Action Programme.....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Mobility Policy Review
    Sustainable Mobility Policy Review Background Paper 9 Statistics and Trends Contents Context and questions for consideration .............................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Trends in public transport use ......................................................................................................... 4 3 Demographics of public transport users ...................................................................................... 16 4 Finances and funding ....................................................................................................................... 25 5 Availability and reliability ................................................................................................................ 38 6 Operator statistics ............................................................................................................................ 45 7 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 55 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... 57 Data Sources and References ................................................................................................................ 58 Prepared by
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Reidy Iarnrod Eireann Conference
    The Future For Iarnród Éireann Michael Reidy Strategic & Business Planning Manager Chartered Institute Of Highways and Transportation 17 th February 2011 Background 1 PLANNING OVERVIEW • Very significant population growth recorded over 1996- 2006 • c.40% of national population in the greater Dublin area. • Significant widening of the Dublin Commuter belt. • 16 of 20 NSS Gateways and Hubs on national rail network • Future population projections now less clear. Widening Of The Dublin Rail Commuter Belt Dundalk OUTER Commuter Belt INNER Commuter Belt Longford Drogheda Mullingar Balbriggan Iarnrod Eireann Portrush Rail Network Coleraine Larne Antrim Athlone Clonsilla Howth Bangor Belfast Maynooth Portadown Connolly Sligo Newry Ballina Dundalk Heuston Longford Westport Drogheda Greystones Mullinga r Balbriggan Kildare Knockcroghery Athlone Ballinasloe Clonsilla Howth Portarlington Maynoot h Galway Connolly Athenry Heuston Kildare Greyston es Portarlington Athy Athy Portlaoise Wicklow Ballybrophy Portlaoise Wicklow Ennis Carlow Arklow Limerick Kilkenny Gorey Limerick Jnc Ballybrophy New Ross Wexford Tralee Rosslare Europort Waterford Banteer Mallow Carlow Killarney Cork Arklow Cobh Kilkenny Gorey 2 Rail Policy Influences • Positive Influences • Negative Influences – Political acceptability – Competition for fund – Sustainability – Low densities – Regional development – Economic – EU policies commentators Expanding the Railway Expand Decline Rebuild •Recession and •Rapid population •Emphasis on Sustainable declining and economic growth Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Rail Network Strategy Review Final Report
    2030 Rail Network Strategy Review Final Report October, 2011 i Contents Executive Summary viii 1 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Report 1 1.2 Objectives of the Review 1 1.3 Study Methodology 2 1.4 Layout of the Report 3 2 The Policy Context for the Strategic Review 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Government Transport Investment Policies 5 2.3 Policy Factors Underlying Transport Investment 7 2.4 European Transport Policies 11 2.5 Institutional Structures 12 2.6 Overview 13 3 Objectives & Strategic Priorities 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Overriding Strategic Objective of Iarnród Éireann 17 3.3 Economic Development Needs 18 3.4 The Contribution of Rail to Economic Development Needs 21 3.5 Other Objectives for the Railway System 26 3.6 Implications for Development of the Strategy 29 ii 4 Recent Rail Developments 4.1 Introduction 31 4.2 Rehabilitation of Infrastructures & Other Key Investments 31 4.3 Rolling Stock 34 4.4 Service Development 35 4.5 Passenger Demand 37 4.6 Financial Performance 40 4.7 Overview 42 5 Mapping Current Rail Demand 5.1 Introduction 45 5.2 Profile of InterCity Rail Passengers 47 5.3 Development of a National Rail Model 49 5.4 Passenger Demand Across the Network 50 5.5 Inter-Urban Demand 52 5.6 Passenger Boardings 54 5.7 Passenger Kilometres 56 5.8 Financial Performance 58 5.9 Mode Competition 60 5.10 Defining Potential Demand 62 5.11 Conclusions 63 iii 6 Infrastructure & Service Review 6.1 Introduction 65 6.2 Network Classification 65 6.3 Population Catchments 67 6.4 Line Quality 69 7 Passenger Demand Forecasts 7.1 Introduction 81 7.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework
    Limerick City and County Council Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework Study 2 The following people and organisations contributed Mr David Clements to the development of the Movement Framework Organisations/Individuals consulted as part of Study: the development of the study: Limerick City and County Council: Ultan Gogarty – Limerick Institute of Technology Paul Crowe Orlaith Borthwick, Gary Rowan – Limerick Chamber Vincent Murray Miriam Flynn – Bus Éireann Rory McDermott Joe Hoare – University Hospital Limerick Carmel Lynch Insp. Paul Reidy, Sgt. Peter Kelly – An Garda Neal Boyle Síochána John J. Ryan Helen O’Donnell, Philip Danaher – Limerick City Kieran Reeves Business Association Mairead Corrigan Brian Kirby – Mary Immaculate College Robert Reidy, John Moroney – University of Limerick Smarter Travel Office: Limerick Pat O’Neill Michael Curtin – Eurobus Limerick Lise-Ann Sheehan Consultant Members of the Project Team for National Transport Authority: delivery of the Movement Framework Study: Mr Hugh Creegan Tiago Oliveira, Arup Consulting Engineers David O’Keeffe, Arup Consulting Engineers Clifford Killeen, Arup Consulting Engineers Images Photography for this report was provided by Limerick City & County Council and Arup Consulting Engineers. Graphics for this report were provided by Arup Consulting Engineers. 3 Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework Study 1 Executive Summary and Introduction 7 1.1 Executive Summary 8 1.2 Introduction - The Limerick Metropolitan District Movement Framework Study 9 2 Literature
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Ireland. Wikipedia. Last Modified
    Republic of Ireland - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Republic of Ireland Permanent link From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page information Data item This article is about the modern state. For the revolutionary republic of 1919–1922, see Irish Cite this page Republic. For other uses, see Ireland (disambiguation). Print/export Ireland (/ˈaɪərlənd/ or /ˈɑrlənd/; Irish: Éire, Ireland[a] pronounced [ˈeː.ɾʲə] ( listen)), also known as the Republic Create a book Éire of Ireland (Irish: Poblacht na hÉireann), is a sovereign Download as PDF state in Europe occupying about five-sixths of the island Printable version of Ireland. The capital is Dublin, located in the eastern part of the island. The state shares its only land border Languages with Northern Ireland, one of the constituent countries of Acèh the United Kingdom. It is otherwise surrounded by the Адыгэбзэ Atlantic Ocean, with the Celtic Sea to the south, Saint Flag Coat of arms George's Channel to the south east, and the Irish Sea to Afrikaans [10] Anthem: "Amhrán na bhFiann" Alemannisch the east. It is a unitary, parliamentary republic with an elected president serving as head of state. The head "The Soldiers' Song" Sorry, your browser either has JavaScript of government, the Taoiseach, is nominated by the lower Ænglisc disabled or does not have any supported house of parliament, Dáil Éireann. player. You can download the clip or download a Aragonés The modern Irish state gained effective independence player to play the clip in your browser. from the United Kingdom—as the Irish Free State—in Armãneashce 1922 following the Irish War of Independence, which Arpetan resulted in the Anglo-Irish Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005 1
    Annual Report 2005 1 Annual Report 2005 © Department of Transport Department of Transport Transport House, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland Tel 01-6707444 Fax 01-6709633 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.transport.ie Copies of this report may be downloaded from www.transport.ie in pdf format. The Department may be contacted from any part of the country for the price of a local call by dialling 1890-443311 An Roinn Iompair Teach Iompair, Sráid Chill Dara, Baile Átha Claith 2, Éire Tel 01-6707444 Fax 01- 6709633 Rphoist: [email protected] Láithair Eangach: http://www.transport.ie Is féidir teangmhail a dhéanamh leis an Roinn ó aon pháirt den tír le haghaidh praghas glaoch áitiúil má dhiailionn tú 1890-443311 Annual Report 2005 Statement of the Minister It is my pleasure to introduce my 3 Department’s Annual Report for 2005 which reports on progress against our ambitious commitments and objectives set down in our most recent Statement of Strategy 2005-2007. Significant progress on implementing the Agreed Pass, Sligo Inner Relief Road, South Programme for Government has been made by Eastern Motorway section of M50. the Department in the course of 2005. The commencement of work on 15 other In 2005 my Department was given an projects including Dundalk/border on the extraordinary opportunity by Government: To M1, Arklow/Gorey Bypass on the N11 and prepare a plan to transform this country’s the Monaghan By Pass on the N2; transport network within a ten-year financial Major public transport developments framework. The opportunity was great, the including completion of the DART upgrade challenge immense but we met that challenge with project (extended platforms for 8 car trains, the launch, on 1 November, 2005 of the Transport accessibility improvements), entry into 21 project.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Infrastrucure
    9. NATIONAL ANTI- POVERTY STRATEGY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY (NAP/INCLUSION) The ten year National Anti-Poverty strategy (NAP) was launched 9.1 in 1997 to help achieve the objective of eliminating poverty in Introduction Ireland. This was revised and further developed in the NAP Building an Inclusive Society: Review of the National Anti-Poverty Strategy (2002). The Lisbon Strategy, which is outlined above, also refers to social cohesion goals and required Member States to produce Action Plans against Poverty and Social Exclusion (NAP/inclusion). Two NAP/inclusion plans, 2001-2003 and 2003-2005 have already been completed. The second NAP/inclusion plan was recently reviewed and the Office for Social Inclusion, which was set up to co-ordinate the Anti-Poverty and Social Inclusion policy, has produced a report on the consultation for the next NAP/inclusion for the period 2006-2009. The overall goal of the NAP/inclusion process is to “…reduce substantially and ideally eliminate poverty in Ireland and to build a socially inclusive society”, where poverty is defined in the following way: People are living in poverty if their income and resources (material, cultural and social) are so inadequate as to preclude them from having a standard of living, which is regarded as acceptable by Irish society generally. As a result of inadequate income and resources, people may be excluded and marginalised from participating in activities, which are considered the norm for other people in society. The overall goal of the strategy is to be achieved through more
    [Show full text]
  • Ten-Year Strategy for the Haulage Sector First Consultation Document
    Ten-year Strategy for the Haulage Sector First Consultation Document Contents Minister’s Foreword .......................................................................................................................... 3 Consultation Process ......................................................................................................................... 4 Road Haulage .................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Ireland’s haulage fleet ............................................................................................................ 5 2. COVID-19 & Brexit.................................................................................................................. 6 COVID-19 ................................................................................................................................... 6 Questions .................................................................................................................................. 7 Brexit ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Questions .................................................................................................................................. 9 3. Making Road Freight Transport Cleaner: Environmental Regulation, Sustainability and Decarbonisation ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Top-30 of Economists in Ireland
    Working Paper No. 301 June 2009 www.esri.ie Estimating the Impact of Metro North Edgar Morgenroth Subsequently published as D. Jacobson and D. Ó Broin (eds.) Local Dublin, Global Dublin: Public Policy in an Evolving City Region. Dublin: DCU Press/ Glasnevin Publishing. 2010. Abstract: The single largest project under the Irish National Development Plan (NDP) 2007-2013, is the construction of a Metro system. Despite the fact that this is the largest project under the NDP and the government’s transport strategy, Transport 21, no cost benefit analysis on the project has been published. This paper aims at addressing this lack of published analysis by considering the likely economic impact one of the Metro projects, Metro-North. In doing so the paper implements two novel methods namely the use of estimates from hedonic house price models and the results from macroeconomic studies instead of the conventional cost-benefit analysis. The two methods come up with contradictory results in that the hedonic pricing methodology would suggest that the Metro-North project should not proceed while the macroeconomic approach suggests the investment should go ahead. These results are dependent on the underlying assumptions, excluded benefits and parameters used, but given the analysis in the paper alternatives can be implemented readily. Key Words: Metro North, impact assessment JEL Code: H43, H54, R42, R53 Corresponding Author: [email protected] ESRI working papers represent un-refereed work-in-progress by members who are solely responsible for the content and any views expressed therein. Any comments on these papers will be welcome and should be sent to the author(s) by email.
    [Show full text]