Diehards and Democracy Elites, Inequality and Institutions in African Elections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diehards and Democracy Elites, Inequality and Institutions in African Elections Briefing Note 1201 April 2012 Diehards and democracy Elites, inequality and institutions in African elections Multi-party elections are a salient feature of Africa’s rapidly evolving political landscape. International support for elections is prioritised above all other strategies for consolidating democracy. The legacies of political reform are diverse, and variable. Technology, natural resource endowments, rising inequality, volatile food and fuel costs, and entrenched elites are influencing elections in ways few anticipated. These notes examine some essential traits of recent African elections, and consider their implications for future contests. • Elections viewed as democratic benchmark, hegemonies adapt • Political competition invigorated, old elites recycled • Fewer civil wars and coups, more electoral violence • Economic growth attended by inadequate job creation and popular discontent • Electoral management improved, electoral disputes common • Extensions to presidential term limits rebuffed, constitutions remain vulnerable Democratic Africa Elections in 2012 Africa is undergoing rapid political transition. Governments and politicians are confronted by voluble demands for greater transparency and accountability. The proliferation of mobile telecommunications has intensified scrutiny. Hegemonies – old and new – have adapted to fundamental changes in external relations and political rivalry. African leaders confronted the uncertainties of the post-Cold War era with pragmatism and resilience. In the late 1980s and 1990s, economic liberalisation imposed by the World Presidential, Bank and IMF coincided with dwindling external patronage. national assembly, As governments looked to internal constituencies to local underscore their legitimacy, political reform ensued. In 2012, Presidential, only four countries in Africa lack multi-party constitutions: national assembly National assembly, Eritrea, Swaziland, Libya and Somalia. local National assembly Multi-party elections are widely regarded as the benchmark for appraising the democratic credentials of African Local governments. In 1989, three African countries were labelled electoral democracies. By 2011, the number had risen to 181 and 15 countries held presidential, legislative and/or local Voting and tactics government elections during the year. Twenty-three countries Substantial external funding for elections has recast political have polls scheduled for 2012.2 Popular participation in competition in Africa. Many multi-party elections involve the elections is usually enthusiastic. In South Africa, voter turnout recycling of protagonists. In Nigeria, former military ruler has exceeded 76% in all parliamentary contests since 1994.3 Major General Muhammadu Buhari ran for the presidency in 2003, 2007 and 2011. Four potential candidates for the 2013 International donors intent on improving “governance” in presidential elections in Kenya – Raila Odinga, Uhuru Africa are closely involved in the funding, planning and Kenyatta, William Ruto, and Kalonzo Musyoka – were monitoring of elections. Polls are costly: the 2011 elections in stalwarts of the Kenya African National Union (KANU) which the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) cost over US$700m, ruled unopposed for 39 years after independence. In most 4 of which 37% was donor-funded. Support is underpinned by countries, new faces remain a rarity among those competing a belief that democracy will improve the accountability of for the highest offices. governments – and development. But multi-party elections have produced diverse political outcomes and myriad Political liberalisation has motivated opposition. Since 1991, unintended consequences, not all of which are progressive. 31 ruling parties or heads of state have been voted from www.africaresearchinstitute.org Registered charity 1118470 office. In Ghana, the opposition has twice secured power Electoral violence is orchestrated by political elites to peacefully since the first multi-party elections in 1992. But intimidate voters. “Youth wings” or party “task forces” are incumbent presidents win most African polls, prevailing over prominent exponents. In Zimbabwe, victory for the stifled or fragmented opposition. Twenty candidates opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in the attempted – unsuccessfully – to end the 26-year rule of 2008 parliamentary election triggered an immediate and President Paul Biya in Cameroon’s 2008 presidential election. brutal response from President Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF). A Ethnicity is commonly used to mobilise electoral support, campaign of beatings and targeted assassinations of MDC intensifying and reinforcing political divisions. Nationwide officials and supporters forced party leader, Morgan support for the Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) in the 2002 Tsvangirai, to withdraw from the presidential run-off vote. elections, which marked the end of a decade-long civil war, was short-lived. In 2007, the SLPP was predominantly Elections can exacerbate existing tensions. A recurrence of supported by the Mende south and east of the country, factional clashes in northern Nigeria followed Goodluck while the Temne and Limba north and Krio community in Jonathan’s victory in the 2011 presidential election. More the west rallied behind the All People’s Congress (APC). than 800 people were killed in the fighting. Perceived Ethnic or sectarian electoral loyalties more often reflect the consolidation of power by politicians from the dispensing and pursuit of patronage benefits than predominantly Christian south, and enduring economic entrenched enmity. disparity between northern and southern states, fuelled the unrest. Clashes in Kenya’s Rift Valley following the 2007 Vote-buying is common, and effective. Cash – or favours – elections reflected grievances among Kalenjin and Maasai for votes constitutes a more immediate and tangible reward over traditional lands allocated to Kikuyu in the 1970s by than promises to deliver public goods or reform policy. In President Jomo Kenyatta. Zambia, opposition leader Michael Sata resourcefully adopted “Don’t Kubeba” – “Don’t Tell” – as his campaign The compulsion to retain public office – and susceptibility slogan for the 2011 presidential election, encouraging to resort to violence – is most pronounced in countries people to accept “gifts” from rival Movement for Multi-party where state resources are the principal, or most easily Democracy politicians but not let that influence how they accessible, repository of economic opportunity. Where would vote. Sata won the presidency, and his Patriotic Front elections are “winner takes all” contests, violence is a cheap secured a majority in parliament. and effective electoral device. The prevalence of electoral violence is a clear signal of the possibility of more “The problem of Africa in general and Uganda widespread and protracted strife. in particular is not the people but the leaders who want to overstay in power” Growth, youth and protest – Yoweri Museveni, President of Uganda, 19865 Democratic reforms have coincided with declarations of an economic renaissance in Africa, prompted by growth Resounding victories at polls with voter turnouts above 90% averaging 6% in the 2000s.8 Continental summaries and are usually associated with countries governed by former projections mask significant variations. Ghana’s GDP grew liberation movements. President Paul Kagame polled 93% by 13.5% in 2011. In neighbouring Côte d’Ivoire, GDP of Rwanda’s 2010 presidential vote. The Ethiopian People's contracted by 5.8%.9 Democratic reforms and economic Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) led by Prime growth have raised expectations among African electorates. Minister Meles Zenawi won all but two of the 547 The economic – and democratic – potential of an emerging parliamentary seats in 2010. In Rwanda and Ethiopia, middle class in Africa is widely extolled. But per capita national elections have become formalities. The need for income in sub-Saharan Africa was lower in 2005 than in national reconstruction and accelerated development is 1975. Inequality is rising and poverty levels remain cited as justification for consensus politics and the restriction stubbornly high. In Sierra Leone, while GDP growth of inter-party competition. averaged 5% a year in 2007-11, the purchasing power of low-income earners halved.10 No government in Violence sub-Saharan Africa has yet created the conditions for Accession to power through elections is the norm in Africa. sustainable and transformative agricultural or industrial In the 1960s and 1970s, three-quarters of African leaders development. were forced from office by coup d’état or assassinated.6 In the 2000s, there were eight military coups on the continent. The Scant progress was recorded in raising the quantity – or number of civil wars halved between 1992 and the quality – of formal sector employment in Africa during the mid-2000s. While elections have generally been more 2000s, despite democratic reforms. In South Africa, which peaceable mechanisms for contesting power, politically boasts the continent’s largest and most diversified economy, motivated violence occurred in 60% of African elections in 624,000 jobs were created during the 2000s. In 1997-98, 1990-2008.7 1.8m jobs were created in a single year. In 2012, a quarter of www.africaresearchinstitute.org South Africa’s labour force – and more than half of 15-24 year the chairman of the National Electoral Commission was olds –
Recommended publications
  • Predators 2021 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PREDATORS 2021 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Azerbaijan 167/180* Eritrea 180/180* Isaias AFWERKI Ilham Aliyev Born 2 February 1946 Born 24 December 1961 > President of the Republic of Eritrea > President of the Republic of Azerbaijan since 19 May 1993 since 2003 > Predator since 18 September 2001, the day he suddenly eliminated > Predator since taking office, but especially since 2014 his political rivals, closed all privately-owned media and jailed outspoken PREDATORY METHOD: Subservient judicial system journalists Azerbaijan’s subservient judicial system convicts journalists on absurd, spurious PREDATORY METHOD: Paranoid totalitarianism charges that are sometimes very serious, while the security services never The least attempt to question or challenge the regime is regarded as a threat to rush to investigate physical attacks on journalists and sometimes protect their “national security.” There are no more privately-owned media, only state media assailants, even when they have committed appalling crimes. Under President with Stalinist editorial policies. Journalists are regarded as enemies. Some have Aliyev, news sites can be legally blocked if they pose a “danger to the state died in prison, others have been imprisoned for the past 20 years in the most or society.” Censorship was stepped up during the war with neighbouring appalling conditions, without access to their family or a lawyer. According to Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh and the government routinely refuses to give the information RSF has been getting for the past two decades, journalists accreditation to foreign journalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Leaders in Africa: Presidents, Patrons Or Profiteers?
    Political Leaders in Africa: Presidents, Patrons or Profiteers? By Jo-Ansie van Wyk Occasional Paper Series: Volume 2, Number 1, 2007 The Occasional Paper Series is published by The African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD). ACCORD is a non-governmental, non-aligned conflict resolution organisation based in Durban, South Africa. ACCORD is constituted as an education trust. Views expressed in this Occasional Paper are not necessarily those of ACCORD. While every attempt is made to ensure that the information published here is accurate, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage that may arise out of the reliance of any person upon any of the information this Occassional Paper contains. Copyright © ACCORD 2007 All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISSN 1608-3954 Unsolicited manuscripts may be submitted to: The Editor, Occasional Paper Series, c/o ACCORD, Private Bag X018, Umhlanga Rocks 4320, Durban, South Africa or email: [email protected] Manuscripts should be about 10 000 words in length. All references must be included. Abstract It is easy to experience a sense of déjà vu when analysing political lead- ership in Africa. The perception is that African leaders rule failed states that have acquired tags such as “corruptocracies”, “chaosocracies” or “terrorocracies”. Perspectives on political leadership in Africa vary from the “criminalisation” of the state to political leadership as “dispensing patrimony”, the “recycling” of elites and the use of state power and resources to consolidate political and economic power.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ethnic Armies Shape the Capacity of Presidents to Defy Term Limits
    Military Loyalty and the Failure of Democratization in Africa: How Ethnic Armies Shape the Capacity of Presidents to Defy Term Limits Kristen A. Harkness School of International Relations University of St. Andrews1 Open Access Copy—Please Do Not Cite Forthcoming in Democratization Abstract: The military plays a crucial role in furthering or hindering democratization in Africa. Beyond direct intervention through coups, armies more subtly and perniciously condition the political trajectory of states through their loyalty. Leaders who can rely on unwavering military support for protection against internal unrest face fewer risks and greater chances of success in rolling back liberalization and entrenching authoritarian practices. Constructing ethnic armies, which tie the fate of soldiers to the regime, is a profoundly powerful way to affect such loyalty. Through a mixed methods analysis of presidential bids to challenge term limits, including a paired comparison of Senegal and Cameroon, I demonstrate that ethnic armies triple the chances of success and, in so doing, encourage defiance in the first place: 82% of presidents back by ethnic armies attempt to defy their constitutions and extend their hold on power, as opposed to 31% of other leaders. Conversely, ethnically diverse armies are far more likely to defend constitutional politics and constrain leaders to abide by term limits. The ethnic composition of the military thus critically shapes the prospects for African liberalization. Key Words: democratization, term limits, civil-military relations, ethnic politics, African politics Many African countries took their “indispensable first steps” toward liberalization2 and free and fair elections after the end of the Cold War.3 Long-time dictators were voted out of office, multi-party competition replaced single party regimes, and respect for civil liberties and human rights increased.
    [Show full text]
  • 1,385,298 2,199 Refugees/ Asylum Seekers USD 29,611,512
    EXTERNAL UNHCR NIGERIAWEEKLY UPDATE 18-25 June, 2015 HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS Summarize, in a few bullet points, the main activities conducted by UNHCR during the reporting period in operations covered in this updates and their impact on beneficiaries. Make sure the sentences are result-oriented and concise. Details on the activities listed in this section can be added in the Achievements section. Also place emphasis on the expansion of UNHCR’s presence, airlift of NFIs, distributions, most at risk groups of population, etc. KEY FIGURES Examples: 1,385,298 -UNHCR distributed plastic sheeting to 500 households in operation 1 since January; Internally Displaced Persons in North East(IOM and NEMA, -Five schools have been established since January in operation 2, thus increasing refugee June 2015 DTM) children’s access to primary school from 10 per cent to 50 per cent; -UNHCR together with the authorities conducted a rapid assessment in XXX site where they identified 175 unaccompanied minors. 2,199 refugees/ asylum seekers Refugees and Asylum as of 31 May 2015 FUNDING UNHCR Representative to Nigeria & ECOWAS, Angèle Dikonguè-Atangana (center), and NHRC President, Prof Bem Angwe (left), appending their signatures to the agreement, 25 USD 29,611,512 June. Abuja Garriba©unhcr Requested for the situation On 25 June, UNHCR and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen collaboration, promote and share experiences with a view to facilitating capacity-building. UNHCR and the Federal Capital Territory Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) distributed non-food items to Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Abuja. UNHCR and NEMA have planned CCCM trainings in Maiduguri and Damaturu for 30 protection actors and state representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Reconfigured Power in Africa Richard Joseph
    “The third wave of democracy did sweep across much of sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s, but has now subsided, except for ripples and eddies.” Democracy and Reconfigured Power in Africa richarD Joseph n July 2009, President Barack Obama declared This is an appropriate moment, therefore, to in Accra, Ghana, that Africa no longer needs step back from the volatility and try to under- Istrongmen—it needs strong institutions. stand the deeper dynamics of political change Almost a year later, at a meeting of the African and continuity in the region. In this exercise, Union in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Secretary of State the perspective of Richard L. Sklar, a longtime Hillary Clinton contended that many African lead- student of African affairs and retired professor of ers seem more concerned with staying eternally political science at the University of California, in power than with ably serving their people. In Los Angeles, is helpful. Sklar has argued for the some cases, she said, democracy “as one election, importance of studying power and the means by one time” still prevails. which it is acquired and exercised. He contends How much do these views correspond with what that all governmental systems are mixed, and is taking place in African countries? What patterns everything that is good in governance may not emerge in the configuration of political power? And necessarily be “democratic.” finally, how do we assess Africa’s democratic pros- Sklar calls attention, for example, to the sig- pects in light of global developments? nificance of oligarchic entities, such as the US As once impregnable autocracies fall in North Supreme Court or the British House of Lords, Africa, the people of sub-Saharan Africa can in capitalist democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • DANISH INSTITUTE for INTERNATIONAL STUDIES STRANDGADE 56 • 1401 COPENHAGEN K • DENMARK TEL +45 32 69 87 87 • [email protected]
    DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES STRANDGADE 56 • 1401 COPENHAGEN K • DENMARK TEL +45 32 69 87 87 • [email protected] • www.diis.dk CAN NEPAD SUCCEED WITHOUT PRIOR POLITICAL REFORM? Ian Taylor DIIS Working Paper no 2005/23 © Copenhagen 2005 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mails: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi as ISBN: 87-7605-112-9 Price: DKK 25.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk Ian Taylor, Dr., Lecturer at University of St. Andrews, Department for International Relations CONTENTS Nepad Elites and their Democratic Qualifications............................................................................4 The African Peer Review Mechanism................................................................................................10 The Great Retreat .................................................................................................................................13 Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................................................19 Bibliography...........................................................................................................................................23 DIIS WORKING PAPER 2005/23 Can NEPAD Succeed without prior Political Reform? Ian Taylor The New Partnership for Africa’s Development or Nepad has
    [Show full text]
  • New Study Links African Conflict to Lack of Term Limits
    US Press VOA News on COVID-19 % Search ' Lang ( Live TV ) Live Radio & News Freedom Iran Pandemic " Africa ! New Study Links African Conflict to Lack of # Term Limits By Salem Solomon $ May 03, 2018 11:29 AM TIGRAY CONFLICT Ethiopian Refugee Crisis CHILD MARRIAGE The Worth of a Girl SOUTH SUDAN South Sudan in Focus MUSIC TIME IN AFRICA ARCHIVE A Journey from Chadian President Idriss Deby attends a meeting with EU and African leaders to discuss how to ease the European Shortwave to Union's migrant crisis, at the Elysee Palace in Paris, on Aug. 28, 2017. Digital This week, Chad’s parliament voted to introduce a new constitution that will allow two more terms for President Idriss Deby, who has led the country since 1990. On May 17, Burundians will vote on a constitutional amendment that would enable President Pierre Nkurunziza, president since 2005, to stay in office an additional 16 years. And in the Democratic Republic of Congo, a worsening humanitarian crisis unfolds while President Joseph Kabila refuses to step down, despite reaching the end of his mandated time in office nearly 18 months ago. The Dragon's Reach - China's Economic Power Play Democratic Republic of Congo's President Joseph Ka FILE - Democratic Republic of Congo's President Joseph Kabila holds a news conference at the State House in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, Jan. 26, 2018. An analysis by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies (ACSS) earlier this year found that less than 40 percent of countries have enforced constitutional term limits, and leaders in just 15 countries have stepped down after two terms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines
    The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines Dear Country Expert, In this section, we distinguish between the head of state (HOS) and the head of government (HOG). • The Head of State (HOS) is an individual or collective body that serves as the chief public representative of the country; his or her function could be purely ceremonial. • The Head of Government (HOG) is the chief officer(s) of the executive branch of government; the HOG may also be HOS, in which case the executive survey only pertains to the HOS. • The executive survey applies to the person who effectively holds these positions in practice. • The HOS/HOG pair will always include the effective ruler of the country, even if for a period this is the commander of foreign occupying forces. • The HOS and/or HOG must rule over a significant part of the country’s territory. • The HOS and/or HOG must be a resident of the country — governments in exile are not listed. • By implication, if you are considering a semi-sovereign territory, such as a colony or an annexed territory, the HOS and/or HOG will be a person located in the territory in question, not in the capital of the colonizing/annexing country. • Only HOSs and/or HOGs who stay in power for 100 consecutive days or more will be included in the surveys. • A country may go without a HOG but there will be no period listed with only a HOG and no HOS. • If a HOG also becomes HOS (interim or full), s/he is moved to the HOS list and removed from the HOG list for the duration of their tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter Accounts Compiled in May 2016 By
    Diplomatic Twitter accounts Compiled in May 2016 by www.unfoldzero.org Twitter accounts: Europe Andorra Prime Minister: Mr. Antoni Martí @GovernAndorra Albania President: Mr. Bujar Nishani @BujarNishani Prime Minister: Mr. Edi Rama, @ediramaal Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Ditmir Bushati @AlbanianMFA UN office in Geneva @AlMissionUNGen Austria Federal Chancellor: Mr. Werner Faymann @Werner_Faymann Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Sebastian Kurz @MFA_Austria Belarus Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Vladimir Makei @BelarusMFA UN office in Geneva @BelarusUNOG Belgium Prime Minister: Mr. Charles Michel @CharlesMichel Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Didier Reynders @dreynders Bosnia and President: Mr. Bakir Izetbegović @B_Izetbegovic Herzegovina Prime Minister: Mr. Denis Zvizdić @DrZvizdic Bulgaria President: Mr. Rosen Plevneliev @PlevnelievRP Prime Minister: Mr. Boyko Borissov @BoykoBorissov Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Daniel Mitov @MFABulgaria Croatia President: Mrs. Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović @KolindaGK Prime Minister: Mr. Tihomir Orešković @ZoranMilanovi Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Miro Kovač @MVEP_hr Czech Republic President: Mr. Miloš Zeman @MZemanOficialni Prime Minister: Mr. Bohuslav Sobotka @SlavekSobotka Minister of Foreign Affairs: Lubomír Zaorálek @ZaoralekL Denmark Prime Minister: Mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen @larsloekke Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Kristian Jensen @UM_dk UN office in Geneva @DKUNmisgva Estonia President: Mr. Toomas Hendrik Ilves @IlvesToomas Prime Minister: Mr. Taavi Rõivas @TaaviRoivas Finland President: Mr. Sauli Niinistö @TPKanslia Prime Minister: Mr. Juha Sipilä @juhasipila Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Timo Soini @Ulkoministeriö UN office in Geneva @FinlandGeneva France President: Mr. François Hollande @fhollande Page 1 Diplomatic Twitter accounts Compiled in May 2016 by www.unfoldzero.org Prime Minister: Mr. Manuel Valls @manuelvalls Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr Jean-Marc Ayrault @jeanmarcayrault UN office in Geneva @FranceONUGeneve Germany Chancellor: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa: Sovereign... Or Conquered?!
    Afr ica: Sovereign... or Conquered?! Th e Libyan masses are threatened. People`s Democratic President Abdelaziz Republic of Angola President José Eduardo Republic of Benin President Yayi Boni Republic of Algeria Boutefl ika dos Santos Republic of Botswana President Ian Khama Burkina Faso President Blaise Republic of Burundi President Pierre Compaoré Nkurunziza Republic of Cameroon President Paul Biya Republic of Cape Verde President Pedro Pires Central African President François Republic Bozizé Th e Republic of Chad, President Idriss Déby Union of the Comoros President Ahmed Republic of the Congo President Denis Sassou- Abdallah Sambi Nguesso Republic of Cote President Laurent Democratic Republic of President Joseph Kabila Republic of Djibouti President Ismail Omar d’Ivoire Gbagbo the Congo Guelleh Arab Republic of Egypt President a.i.Mohamed Republic of Equatorial President Obiang State of Eritrea President Isaias Hussein Tantawi Guinea Nguema Mbasogo Afewerki Federal Democratic President Girma Gabonese Republic President Ali Ben Republic of the Gambia President Yahya Republic of Ethiopia Woldegiorgis Bongo Jammeh Republic of Ghana President John Atta Republic of Guinea President Alpha Condé Republic of Kenya President Mwai Kibaki Mills Kingdom of Lesotho King Letsie III Republic of Liberia President Ellen Great Socialist People`s Secretary General of Johnson-Sirleaf Libyan Arab Jamahiriya the General People’s Congress Mohamed Abu Al-Quasim al-Zwai Republic of Madagascar President of the High Republic of Malawi President Bingu wa Republic
    [Show full text]
  • 96D0f5329bd91be4150f0445eed
    REPUBLIQUEDU CAMEROUN REPUBLIQUE OF CAMEROON Paix - Travail - Patrie Peace - Work- Fatherland ------- ------- CABINET CIVIL CABINET CIVIL ------- ------- CELLULE DE COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION UNIT HIGH-LEVEL VISITS BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA Visits of Nigerian Heads of Visits at the ministerial level State to Cameroon - The Vice - Prime Minister, Amadou Ali has visited - President Goodluck JONATHAN participated in Abuja on many occasions as a Special Envoy of the Summit of Heads of State and Government the Head of State. on Maritime Safety and Security in the Gulf of - The Prime Minister, Head of Government, Guinea, which took place in Yaounde on June Philemon Yang represented the Head of State 24-25, 2013. during the centenary celebrations of the Nigerian - President Goodluck JONATHAN’s first trip Federation on February 27, 2014 in Yaounde. He abroad was in Cameroon on May 20, 2010. This also participated in the International Conference was during celebrations marking Cameroon’s on Peace, Security and Development, which was 50th anniversary of independence. Two former organised during the event. Nigerian leaders; Mr OLUSEGUN OBASANJO - Mr. Rene Emmanuel SADI, Minister of Territorial and YAKUBU GOWON were also present in the Administration and Decentralisation, paid a visit event. to Abuja on March 15, 2014. He was a Special - President-elect His Excellency Alhadji Umaru Envoy of the Head of State to his Nigerian Musa YAR’ADUA paid a courtesy visit to counterpart H.E. Goodluck JONATHAN. Cameroon on May 12, 2007. - Minister Rene Emmanuel SADI was bearer - President Olusegun OBASANJO paid two visits to of a message from H.E Paul Biya to President Cameroon (1999 and 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon: Background to a Crisis
    Number 130 November 1991 CSISAFRICA NOTES A publication of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C. Cameroon: Background to a Crisis by Pierre Englebert Located on the Gulf of Guinea on the west coast of Africa, Cameroon is a country with a mixed colonial heritage, parts or all of its territory having been administered at one time or another by Germany, France, and Britain. Sometimes referred to as an "Africa in miniature, " Cameroon is socially diverse, comprising various ethnic groups of West and Central African descent, adherents of Islam and Christianity, and speakers of French, English, and numerous African languages. Once one of Africa's outstanding success stories, blending economic growth and political stability in a continent short of both, Cameroon now faces serious economic difficulties and a crisis of political legitimacy. The Historical Sequence, 1472-1985 The Portuguese were the first Europeans to set foot in Cameroon. Sometime around 1472, they provided the territory with its future name by designating as Rio dos Camares what is today the Wouri river, a reference to the waterway's crawfish mistakenly thought to be shrimp (carriaroes). Bismarck's Germany became the first colonial occupant with the establishment of the so-called Kamerun protectorate in 1884. The three decades of German rule were marked both by repression and by the development of modern infrastructure. In 1916, midway in World War I, French, Belgian, and British troops forced the surrender of the German governor. The League of Nations subsequently granted France a mandate over four-fifths of the territory and Britain a mandate over the remaining western fifth, made up of two separate regions along the Nigerian border (see Mark W.
    [Show full text]