Cerrado Manifesto

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cerrado Manifesto September 11th, 2017 Brazil destroyed 18,962 km2 of the Cerrado between 2013 and 20151. In other words, every two months during that time, an area of the Cerrado the size of the Greater London disappeared. Deforestation rates of the Cerrado have exceeded those of the Amazon for over 10 years. The pace of this destruction makes the Cerrado one of the most threatened ecosystems on the planet. Considered the birthplace of many of Brazil's great water systems, the Cerrado – the world’s most biodiverse savannah – has already lost 50% of its original area. According to a recent article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution2, the rate of destruction in the Cerrado will result in the catastrophic extinction of species. Moreover, continued destruction of the Cerrado will cause changes in the region’s rainfall patterns, affecting agricultural productivity3, as has already occurred in the Amazon4. The Cerrado stores the equivalent of 13.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2)5, and the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from native vegetation conversion will impede Brazil's international commitments under the climate and biodiversity conventions. The main cause of conversion in the Cerrado is the expansion of agribusiness. Between 2007 and 2014, 26% of agricultural expansion in the Cerrado occurred directly into areas of native vegetation6. In Matopiba alone – located in the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia, and considered the main frontier of vegetation conversion – 62% of agricultural expansion replaced native vegetation7. Recent analyses suggest that, between 2000 and 2016, 49% of pastureland expansion in Matopiba occurred in the Cerrado8. An area that is converted for grazing is often later used for crops such as soy9. It is unnecessary for the livestock and agricultural sectors to continue expanding into natural habitats in the Cerrado, especially considering there are around 40 million hectares already cleared in Brazil suitable for cultivating soy – the main crop associated with the destruction of native vegetation10. Modest gains in cattle-raising efficiency would free millions of hectares for other types of land use11. Responsibility for this problem – and the search for solutions that can quickly stop the destruction of the Cerrado – is shared by all actors of the production and supply chains, from the producers to 1 INPE & Funcate, 2017. 2 Strassburg et al., 2017. 3Silvério et al., 2015; Spera et al., 2016; Costa e Pires, 2009. 4 Meyfroidt et al., 2014. 5 CEPF, 2016. 6 Carneiro Filho & Costa, 2016. 7 Ibidem. 8 IPAM, unpublished. 49% of the existing pasture area in Matopiba in 2016 was a result of native vegetation conversion since 2000. Data for this analysis is available on the Mapbiomas platform: http://mapbiomas.org/map#transitions. 9 Carneiro Filho & Costa, 2016. 10 Carneiro Filho & Costa, 2016. 11 Strassburg et al., 2014. consumers, including traders, meat-packing companies, retailers, investors, agricultural producers, and land developers. It should be noted that, while enforcement of environmental legislation, including the Forest Code, is important, it is not enough to ensure conservation of the biome, since it allows legal conversion of up to 80% of rural properties. The private sector has learned that it is possible to produce commodities while avoiding supply chains being directly associated with further conversion of natural ecosystems, as exemplified by the Amazon Soy Moratorium. Collaboration between different links of the production chain, together with government support and civil society monitoring, was the path taken by the Soy Moratorium, and should now inspire similar solutions in the Cerrado. The undersigned civil society organizations call for immediate action in defense of the Cerrado by companies that purchase soy and meat from within the biome, as well as by investors active in these sectors. This includes the adoption of effective policies and commitments to eliminate deforestation and conversion of native vegetation and disassociate their supply chains from recently converted areas. The Brazilian government also needs to ensure that the law and international commitments are met by putting instruments and policies in place that can improve governance of agricultural production in the Cerrado. It is essential that protected areas be created, and that the right of access to the land is guaranteed for indigenous people, traditional communities, and small farmers in the region. It is also crucial that official data on deforestation and native vegetation conversion in the Cerrado be published annually, as is already the case for the Amazon. Incentives and economic instruments need to be developed by both the government and the private sector to reward farmers’ efforts to conserve areas of native vegetation, even when they are eligible for legal clearance. This collective and multisectoral effort will enable production to continue while a diversified economy is developed in the region, guaranteeing rights and income for local communities and adequate protection of the Cerrado’s valuable natural ecosystems. THE FUTURE OF THE CERRADO IN THE HANDS OF THE MARKET: DEFORESTATION AND NATIVE VEGETATION CONVERSION MUST BE STOPPED MANIFESTO COSIGNERS . WWF-Brazil . Greenpeace Brazil . Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM) . Institute of Agricultural and Forest Management and Certification (Imaflora) . The Nature Conservancy (TNC) . Earth Innovation Institute (EII) . Institute for Society, Population and Nature (ISPN) . Conservation International – Brazil (CI-Brasil) . Association for the Preservation of the Upper Itajaí Valley (APREMAV) . Green Initiative . APREC Coastline Ecosystems . Avina Foundation . Engajamundo . GeoLab/USP . Lagesa/UFMG . Lapig/UFG . PHS . Life Center Institute (ICV) . Amazon Institute of People and Environment (IMAZON) . Socio-Environmental Institute (ISA) . Pro-Nature Foundation (Funatura) . Conservation Strategy Fund (CSF) . Minas Gerais Association for Environmental Defense (AMDA) . LABAQUAC/Hippocampus Project . Ecological Research Institute (IPÊ) . Boticário Group Foundation for Nature Protection . BVRio Institute . Law for a Green Planet Institute . Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira . Wildlife Conservation Society – Brazil (WCS-Brazil) . Institute for the Conservation and Sustainable Development of the Amazon (IDESAM) . Çarakura Institute . Biodiversitas Foundation . American Man Museum Foundation (FUMDHAM) . National Wildlife Federation (NWF) . Ecoa – Ecology and Action . GTA Network . Zero Deforestation Group . Forest Code Observatory . Climate Observatory . Enviroment Defend Fund (EDF) . Center for Studies and Environmental Research of Northeast Brazil (Cepan) . Both Ends . Sociedade Civil Mamirauá (SCM) – Mamirauá Institute . Vitória Amazônica Foundation (FVA) . International Institute of Education of Brazil (IIEB) . Union of Concerned Scientists – UCS . Both ENDS . Slow Food Brasil . Sociedade Civil Mamirauá . Articulação Pacari de Plantas Medicinais do Cerrado . PEQUI - Pesquisa e Conservação do Cerrado . Instituto Pe. João Peter . Agência 10envolvimento . Instituto Oca Brasil . Instituto Mamirauá . Instituto Federal de Brasília (IFB) . Cerratenses – Centro de Excelência do Cerrado . Jardim Botânico de Brasília . Mighty Earth APPENDIX Additional data and references underpinning this manifesto 1. Rates of deforestation and conversion are extremely high A serious and consistent conversion process is taking place in the Cerrado. Even during successive droughts and crop shortfalls, the rates of conversion in the Matopiba region remained high, as demonstrated for the period between 2013 and 2015 (INPE & FUNCATE, 2017). In addition, the 10 municipalities with the highest deforestation rates in the Cerrado are located in Matopiba. 2. Territorial expansion and land conversion in Matopiba are uncontrolled Studies predict the conversion of 6.6 million hectares of land with low productive capacity and a high risk of desertification (Carneiro Filho & Costa, 2016). 3. The rates of deforestation and conversion could increase in 2017 due to: i. Increased rainfall after five years of drought, leading to a record soy harvest in 2017 (CONAB, 2017). ii. Capitalization of producers because of their harvests, increasing their capacity to invest in the expansion of their production into areas of native vegetation. iii. Potential approval of laws on foreign land ownership, further intensifying the strong real estate speculation market in the region (six bills included in PL 2289/2007, House of Representatives, 2017a). iv. Potential approval of laws regarding new regulations for the licensing of agricultural production, making procedures more flexible and facilitating land conversion (19 bills included in PL 3729/2004, House of Representatives, 2017b). 4. The expansion of production should only occur in previously cleared areas The 40 million hectares mentioned in this manifesto (Carneiro Filho & Costa, 2016) are enough for Brazil to meet the goals of soy production expansion over the next 50 years. The soy sector already knows how to expand into previously cleared areas, as this is standard practice in regions other than Matopiba, such as the Amazon biome and other areas of the Cerrado. 5. The law does not go far enough The law still allows for the legal deforestation and conversion of 40 million hectares of the Cerrado. Soy production expanded by over 250% in Matopiba between 2000 and 2014 (Agrossatélite, 2015), mainly through the conversion of native vegetation, which
Recommended publications
  • CERRADO BIOME an Assessment Developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME
    CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AND SOCIAL INCLUSION IN THE CERRADO BIOME An assessment developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME AREA OF DETAIL Brazil Sources: Reference layers: http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ Matopiba: http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/geociencias/default_prod.shtm Cerrado Biome: http://maps.lapig.iesa.ufg.br/lapig.html Photo: CEA CONTENTS About this report 2 Executive summary 3 Introduction 13 Proposed priorities 18 PRIORITY 1 Strong implementation of the Forest Code 18 PRIORITY 2 Protection and management of community and conservation lands 26 PRIORITY 3 Incentives for conservation 36 PRIORITY 4 Improved sustainability and productivity of existing agricultural lands and pasturelands 40 PRIORITY 5 Cover photos: Building the case for biodiversity ponsulak/Shutterstock (soybeans) Bento Viana/ISPN (palm and cut fruit) and landscape conservation 46 Paulo Vilela/Shutterstock (soy plants) Peter Caton/ISPN (baskets) Research agenda 49 Alf Ribeiro/Shutterstock (tractors) Conclusion 51 ABOUT THIS REPORT This document outlines a set of opportunities that can contribute to conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems, growth in agricultural production, and support for social inclusion and traditional livelihoods in Brazil’s Cerrado biome for the future of the region. It was prepared by CEA Consulting at the request of the Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA), a philanthropic collaborative of the ClimateWorks Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. It was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the ClimateWorks Foundation. The intended audience for this report is the full range of stakeholders working in the Cerrado biome; the recommendations included here are not designed for any particular actor and in fact would necessarily need to be undertaken by many different actors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of the Cerrado's Water
    THE RELEVANCE OF THE CERRADO’S WATER RESOURCES TO THE BRAZILIAN DEVELOPMENT Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima1; Euzebio Medrado da Silva1; Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho1; Eder de Souza Martins1; Adriana Reatto1; Vinicius Bof Bufon1 1 Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, km 18, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil, 70670-305. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cerrado (Brazilian savanna) is the second largest Brazilian biome (204 million hectares) and due to its location in the Brazilian Central Plateau it plays an important role in terms of water production and distribution throughout the country. Eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this Biome. It contributes to more than 90% of the discharge of the São Francisco River, 50% of the Paraná River, and 70% of the Tocantins River. Therefore, the Cerrado is a strategic region for the national hydropower sector, being responsible for more than 50% of the Brazilian hydroelectricity production. Furthermore, it has an outstanding relevance in the national agricultural scenery. Despite of the relatively abundance of water in most of the region, water conflicts are beginning to arise in some areas. The objective of this paper is to discuss the economical and ecological relevance of the water resources of the Cerrado. Key-words: Brazilian savanna; water management; water conflicts. INTRODUCTION The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome in extension, with about 204 million hectares, occupying 24% of the national territory approximately. Its largest portion is located within the Brazilian Central Plateau which consists of higher altitude areas in the central part of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil
    The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil Pantanal Program Mônica Harris, Erika Guimarães, George Camargo, Cláudia Arcângelo, Elaine Pinto Cerrado Program Ricardo Machado, Mario Barroso, Cristiano Nogueira CI in Brazil • Active since 1988. • Two Hotspots: Atlantic Forest and Cerrado • Three Wilderness Areas: Amazon, Pantanal and Caatinga • Marine Program Cerrado overview • 2,000,000 km2 Savannah • approximately 4,400 of its 10,000 plant species occur nowhere else in the world • 75% loss of the original vegetation cover • Waters from the Cerrado drain into the lower Pantanal Pantanal overview • A 140,000 km2 central floodplain surrounded by a highland belt of Cerrado • Home for at least: – 3,500 species of plants –300fishes –652 birds –102 mammals – 177 reptiles – 40 amphibians • Largest wetland in the world, with extremely high densities of several large vertebrate species The Cerrado – Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor – The Beginning: • Priority Setting Workshop for the Cerrado and the Pantanal (1998) • Partnership:CI, Ministry for the Environment, Funatura, Biodiversitas and UnB. • Priority areas were identified for biodiversity conservation by 250 specialists TheThe ResultsResults:: Priority Areas for the Conservation of the Cerrado and Pantanal Corredores de Biodiversidade Cerrado / Pantanal CorridorsCorridors Chapada dos Guimarães betweenbetween # # thethe CerradoCerrado # Unidade de conservação Pantanal Matogrossense andand thethe Áreas prioritárias Taquaril Emas Rios # Corredores propostos PantanalPantanal Pantanal Rio
    [Show full text]
  • Soy and Cattle: Report 7
    Report 7 November 2019 1 Executive Summary This report presents 12 cases of land clearing based on alerts data from DETER (System for Monitoring Deforestation on Real Time) and PRODES (Program for Deforestation Calculation) observed between 27 August 2019 and 26 September 2019, in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado biomes. Land clearing alerts considered in this report were visually confirmed. Eight of the selected cases are in the Amazon biome, and four are in the Cerrado biome. Cleared land per municipality of all cases included in this report (in hectares) Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) Cumaru do Norte (Pará) São Félix do Xingu (Pará) Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) Damianópolis (Goiás) Terminology Barreiras (Bahia) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Amazon (18,232 ha) Cerrado (4,685 ha) Rapid Response Soy & Cattle – Report 7 – November 2019 2 Table of Contents Amazon Biome 1. Fazenda Rio Preto I e II – Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) .................... 4 2. Fazenda Rio Dourado – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ........................................ 7 3. Fazenda Nossa Senhora da Medalha – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) ............... 10 4. Fazenda Cabocla – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ................................................ 12 5. Fazenda Brusque do Xingu – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) …………………..….…… 15 6. Fazenda Macuco – Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) …………………………………..…… 18 7. Fazenda Nove de Julho – Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) ……………………………...… 20 8. Fazenda São José I – Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) ………................…. 23 Cerrado Biome 9. Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 02 and Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 03 – Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) ……………………………………………………………………… 25 10. Fazenda Grotão – Damianópolis (Goiás) ……………………………………….……….
    [Show full text]
  • Plano De Ação Para Prevenção E Controle Do Desmatamento E Das Queimadas No Estado Do Maranhão
    Governo do Estado do Maranhão Casa Civil Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais Grupo Permanente de Trabalho Interinstitucional PLANO DE AÇÃO PARA PREVENÇÃO E CONTROLE DO DESMATAMENTO E DAS QUEIMADAS NO ESTADO DO MARANHÃO (Decreto nº 27.317, de 14 de abril de 2011) São Luis, Maranhão Novembro de 2011 ROSEANA SARNEY Governadora do Estado do Maranhão WASHINGTON LUIZ DE OLIVEIRA Vice-Governador LUIS FERNANDO MOURA DA SILVA Secretário-Chefe da Casa Civil CARLOS VICTOR GUTERRES MENDES Secretário de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais HILDO AUGUSTO DA ROCHA NETO Secretário de Estado de Assuntos Políticos CONCEIÇÃO DE MARIA CARVALHO DE ANDRADE Secretária de Estado do Desenvolvimento Agrário e Agricultura Familiar FRANCISCO ASSIS CASTRO GOMES Secretário de Estado do Desenvolvimento Social JURANDIR FERRO DO LAGO FILHO Secretário de Estado do Turismo CLÁUDIO DONISETE AZEVEDO Secretário de Estado da Agricultura, Pecuária e Pesca OLGA MARIA LENZA SIMÃO Secretária de Estado da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior JOÃO BERNARDO BRINGEL Secretário de Estado da Educação JOSÉ MAURÍCIO DE MACEDO SANTOS Secretário de Estado do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio CARLOS ALBERTO FRANCO DE ALMEIDA Secretário Extraordinário de Assuntos Estratégicos FÁBIO GONDIM PEREIRA DA COSTA Secretário de Estado do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão JOSÉ AUGUSTO SILVA OLIVEIRA Universidade Estadual do Maranhão 2 Grupo Permanente de Trabalho Interinstitucional Casa Civil Luis Francisco de Assis Léda Maria Odinéa Melo Santos Ribeiro Secretaria de
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 12 the Cerrados of Brazil.Pdf
    00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page i The Cerrados of Brazil 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page ii 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iii The Cerrados of Brazil Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna Editors Paulo S. Oliveira Robert J. Marquis Columbia University Press New York 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iv Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex © 2002 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The cerrados of Brazil : ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna / Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-231-12042-7 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0-231-12043-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Cerrado ecology—Brazil. I. Oliveira, Paulo S., 1957– II. Marquis, Robert J., 1953– QH117 .C52 2002 577.4'8'0981—dc21 2002022739 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page v Contents Preface vii 1 Introduction: Development of Research in the Cerrados 1 Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis I Historical Framework and the Abiotic Environment 2 Relation of Soils and Geomorphic Surfaces in the Brazilian Cerrado 13 Paulo E. F. Motta, Nilton Curi, and Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine
    remote sensing Article Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine Carlos M. Souza Jr. 1,* , Julia Z. Shimbo 2, Marcos R. Rosa 3 , Leandro L. Parente 4 , Ane A. Alencar 2 , Bernardo F. T. Rudorff 5 , Heinrich Hasenack 6 , Marcelo Matsumoto 7 , Laerte G. Ferreira 4, Pedro W. M. Souza-Filho 8 , Sergio W. de Oliveira 9, Washington F. Rocha 10 , Antônio V. Fonseca 1 , Camila B. Marques 2, Cesar G. Diniz 11 , Diego Costa 10 , Dyeden Monteiro 12, Eduardo R. Rosa 13 , Eduardo Vélez-Martin 6 , Eliseu J. Weber 14 , Felipe E. B. Lenti 2 , Fernando F. Paternost 13, Frans G. C. Pareyn 15, João V. Siqueira 16, José L. Viera 15, Luiz C. Ferreira Neto 11, Marciano M. Saraiva 5 , Marcio H. Sales 17, Moises P. G. Salgado 5 , Rodrigo Vasconcelos 10, Soltan Galano 10, Vinicius V. Mesquita 4 and Tasso Azevedo 18 1 Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (Imazon), Belém 66055-200, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (Ipam), Brasília 70863-520, Brazil; [email protected] (J.Z.S.); [email protected] (A.A.A.); [email protected] (C.B.M.); [email protected] (F.E.B.L.) 3 Programa de Pós-Gradução em Geografia Física, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil; [email protected] 4 Image Processing and GIS Laboratory (LAPIG), Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiania 74001-970, Brazil; [email protected] (L.L.P.); [email protected] (L.G.F.); [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Program Cerrado Pantanal
    © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana FACTSHEET BR 2016 CERRADO Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © PANTANALPROGRAM © Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana THE WWF-BRAZIL WWF-Brazil is an environmental organization that works to conserve various Brazilian ecosystems, including two of South America’s most important regions: the Cerrado and the Pantanal. The Cerrado, Pantanal and Upper Paraguay River Basin are included in WWF’s 35 global priority places. This vast area is the focus of our conservation work undertaken through the Cerrado Pantanal Program. © Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © CERRADO PANTANAL PRIORITY AREAS The Cerrado Ecoregion The Pantanal Ecoregion Upper Paraguay River Basin © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana CERRADO © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana Stretching across 11 states and the Federal District, the Cerrado is South America’s second largest phytogeographic domain. It can also be found in the states of Roraima, Amapá, Amazonas and Pará and partially covers Bolivia and Paraguay. The Cerrado covers roughly 25% of the country and is one of the biologically richest savannas on the planet. The Cerrado is connected to four of Brazil’s five biomes – the Amazon, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Pantanal. It is regarded as the “cradle” of Brazil’s water resources, since it feeds not only Brazil’s major aquifers, but also six of the country’s eight river basins and the Pantanal. Area Over 2 million sq km Conservation Less than 10% of the Cerrado is covered by protected areas Biodiversity The
    [Show full text]
  • Caracterização Botânica E Fitossociologia De Uma Área De Cerrado, No Maranhão, Sob Pastejo Por Bovinos
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS E VETERINÁRIAS CÂMPUS DE JABOTICABAL CARACTERIZAÇÃO BOTÂNICA E FITOSSOCIOLOGIA DE UMA ÁREA DE CERRADO, NO MARANHÃO, SOB PASTEJO POR BOVINOS Gonçalo Mendes da Conceição Licenciado em Ciências/Biologia JABOTICABAL – SÃO PAULO – BRASIL Fevereiro de 2012 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS E VETERINÁRIAS CÂMPUS DE JABOTICABAL CARACTERIZAÇÃO BOTÂNICA E FITOSSOCIOLOGIA DE UMA ÁREA DE CERRADO, NO MARANHÃO, SOB PASTEJO POR BOVINOS Gonçalo Mendes da Conceição Orientadora: Profª Dra. Ana Cláudia Ruggieri Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias – Unesp, Câmpus de Jaboticabal, como parte das exigências para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Zootecnia. JABOTICABAL – SÃO PAULO – BRASIL Fevereiro de 2012 Conceição, Gonçalo Mendes da C744c Caracterização botânica e fitossociologia de uma área de cerrado, no Maranhão, sob pastejo por Bovinos / Gonçalo Mendes da Conceição. – – Jaboticabal, 2012 xii, 113 f. ; il. ; 28 cm Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, 2012 Orientadora: Ana Cláudia Ruggieri Banca examinadora: Jose Ricardo Soares Telles de Souza, Valdo Rodrigues Herling, Ricardo Andrade Reis, Euclides Braga Malheiros. Bibliografia 1. Forrageira nativa. 2. Pastagem do cerrado. 3. Propriedade rural. 4. Cerrado. I. Título. II. Jaboticabal-Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias. CDU 636.2:636.084.22 DADOS CURRICULARES DO AUTOR GONÇALO MENDES DA CONCEIÇÃO - nascido em 05 de novembro de 1959, na Comunidade Quinlombola denominada de Itaperinha, localizada no município de Tutóia/Maranhão. Filho de João Mendes da Conceição e Joaquina Mendes da Conceição. Iniciou seus estudos superiores na Universidade Vale do Acaraú, no município de Sobral/Ceará, formando-se em Licenciatura em Ciências.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Fire in the Cerrado and Amazonian Rainforests of Brazil: Past and Present
    Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 1, 2011 Pivello: The Use of Fire in Brazil doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0701024 Page 24 FORUM ARTICLE THE USE OF FIRE IN THE CERRADO AND AMAZONIAN RAINFORESTS OF BRAZIL: PAST AND PRESENT Vânia R. Pivello Department of Ecology, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, CEP 05508-090, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Tel.: 055-11-3091-7600; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Humans have been changing the natural fire regimes in most Brazilian vegetation types for over 4000 years. Natural lightning fires can easily happen in savannas and grasslands, but they are rare in the moist rainforests. Today, anthropogenic fires are frequent in both the fire-adapted cerrado (Brazilian savanna) and the fire-sensitive rainforest. In this paper, I compare two very different biomes concerning their susceptibilities and responses to fire: the Amazon rainforest and the cerrado. I present an overview of their fire history, espe- cially regarding human-made fires for land management, and pull together information about the use of fire by indigenous peoples in the cerrado and the Amazon, as this informa- tion is very fragmented. Accordingly, I describe how fire regimes have changed in these biomes over time due to agricultural practices and the consequences of the current altered fire regimes. After European settlement, fire frequency greatly increased in the cerrado, especially related to cattle ranching, and more recently in the more seasonal landscapes in the Amazon. In cerrado natural preserves, however, managers try to keep fire away, but wildfires eventually come and develop into destructive events.
    [Show full text]
  • CLUA Cerrado Biome Assessment August 2016
    CLUA Cerrado Biome Assessment August 2016 Maps by topic Background Physical geography 2 Land use and vegetation 3 Carbon stock 4 Protected, indigenous, and community lands 5 Priority areas for potential protection 7 Deforestation and fire Deforestation by municipality over time 11 Fires by municipality 12 Deforestation and protected areas, cropland, & pasture 13 Agricultural infrastructure & suitability 16 Risk of future deforestation 19 Other Hydrography and hydroelectric power 23 The following maps illustrate the geography of the Cerrado, in particular how deforestation is playing out across Matopiba. They draw heavily upon data generated or hosted by LAPIG Maps. v The Cerrado is a tropical savanna that occupies the central part Brazil, north of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, and south and east of the Amazon. Matopiba is an economic zone in the north of the biome. Note: the Cerrado is an ecosystem type characterized by mosaic savanna that can be found across central Brazil, as well as in parts of Rondônia, Pará, Paraná, and Roraima. These maps show the official boundaries of the political Cerrado rather than the extent of cerrado ecosystem. 2 Matopiba The Cerrado contains part of nine states. Much of the southern Cerrado has been deforested for crops and pasture, while the north has more intact savanna. Matopiba 3 Carbon Stock Northern parts of the Cerrado, near the Amazon, tend to have more carbon-dense, rainforest- like vegetation. 4 Conservation areas can be broadly divided into federal and state protected areas and indigenous lands. In total, Brazil recognizes 12 different types of conservation units, with varying levels of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire in Cerrado and Pantanal - Ecology and Management
    FIRE IN CERRADO AND PANTANAL - ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT Acknowlegments1 purposes long before the Europeans arrive in South America. Natural fire occurrence is related to I would like to congratulate the organizers for the 2nd lightning, which has been noticed in some protected International Wildland Fire ecology and Fire areas. Management Congress, held concurrently with the th 5 Symposium on Fire and forest Meteorology and The existence of several species that tolerate or is thank very much The Nature Conservancy, dependent on fire in the Cerrado vegetation is further represented here by Dr. Ronald L. Myers, for the evidence that fire has been a major ecological factor opportunity to participate at this Congress. in this biome. Studies about fire ecological impacts on climate, soils, nutrient cycling, fauna and flora are available, and they are important to guide the Introduction understanding of the fire regime that could be accepted for a distinct area or region in the future. The Portuguese term Cerrado means closed and designates a vast phytogeographic province Fire regime has been tremendously affected by the dominated by an unambiguous savanna like rural activities in Cerrado and Pantanal region, vegetation, once it can only be found in Central mainly in the last 20 years. Like in many other places Brazil and some fragments in the Southeast, of the world the principal causes are related to Northeast and in the Amazonia. The Cerrado grazing and agriculture, but other reasons are also of occupies more than 1,8 million Km2, comprising 22% cultural importance, as pest control, poisonous of the Brazilian territory.
    [Show full text]