SVBC Brazil (Acre)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Supplementary Material Clariss Domin Drechs
CLARISSA ROSA et al. LONG TERM CONSERVATION IN BRAZIL SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Table SI. Location of sites of the Brazilian Program for Biodiversity Research network. Type id Latitude Longitude Site name CLARISSA ROSA, FABRICIO BACCARO, CECILIA CRONEMBERGER, JULIANA HIPÓLITO, CLAUDIA FRANCA BARROS, Module 1 -9.370 -69.9200 Chandless State Park DOMINGOS DE JESUS RODRIGUES, SELVINO NECKEL-OLIVEIRA, GERHARD E. OVERBECK, ELISANDRO RICARDO Running title: Long term Grid 2 1.010 -51.6500 Amapá National Forest DRECHSLER-SANTOS, MARCELO RODRIGUES DOS ANJOS, ÁTILLA C. FERREGUETTI, ALBERTO AKAMA, MARLÚCIA conservation in Brazil Module 3 -3.080 -59.9600 Federal University of Amazonas BONIFÁCIO MARTINS, WALFRIDO MORAES TOMAS, SANDRA APARECIDA SANTOS, VANDA LÚCIA FERREIRA, CATIA Grid 4 -2.940 -59.9600 Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve NUNES DA CUNHA, JERRY PENHA, JOÃO BATISTA DE PINHO, SUZANA MARIA SALIS, CAROLINA RODRIGUES DA Academy Section: Ecosystems Module 5 -5.610 -67.6000 Médio Juruá COSTA DORIA, VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, LUCIANA R. PODGAISKI, MARCELO MENIN, NARCÍSIO COSTA BÍGIO, SUSAN Grid 6 -1.760 -61.6200 Jaú National Park ARAGÓN, ANGELO GILBERTO MANZATTO, EDUARDO VÉLEZ-MARTIN, ANA CAROLINA BORGES LINS E SILVA, THIAGO Module 7 -2.450 -59.7500 PDBFF fragments JUNQUEIRA IZZO, AMANDA FREDERICO MORTATI, LEANDRO LACERDA GIACOMIN, THAÍS ELIAS ALMEIDA, THIAGO e20201604 Grid 8 -1.780 -59.2700 Uatumã Biological Reserve ANDRÉ, MARIA AUREA PINHEIRO DE ALMEIDA SILVEIRA, ANTÔNIO LAFFAYETE PIRES DA SILVEIRA, MARILUCE Grid 9 -2.660 -60.0600 Experimental Farm from UFAM REZENDE MESSIAS, MARCIA C. M. MARQUES, ANDRE ANDRIAN PADIAL, RENATO MARQUES, YOUSZEF O.C. BITAR, 93 Grid 10 -3.030 -60.3700 Anavilhanas National Park MARCOS SILVEIRA, ELDER FERREIRA MORATO, RUBIANI DE CÁSSIA PAGOTTO, CHRISTINE STRUSSMANN, RICARDO (2) 93(2) Module 11 -3.090 -55.5200 BR-163 M08 BOMFIM MACHADO, LUDMILLA MOURA DE SOUZA AGUIAR, GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES YUMI OKI, SAMUEL Module 12 -4.080 -60.6700 Tupana NOVAIS, GUILHERME BRAGA FERREIRA, FLÁVIA RODRIGUES BARBOSA, ANA C. -
CERRADO BIOME an Assessment Developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AND SOCIAL INCLUSION IN THE CERRADO BIOME An assessment developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME AREA OF DETAIL Brazil Sources: Reference layers: http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ Matopiba: http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/geociencias/default_prod.shtm Cerrado Biome: http://maps.lapig.iesa.ufg.br/lapig.html Photo: CEA CONTENTS About this report 2 Executive summary 3 Introduction 13 Proposed priorities 18 PRIORITY 1 Strong implementation of the Forest Code 18 PRIORITY 2 Protection and management of community and conservation lands 26 PRIORITY 3 Incentives for conservation 36 PRIORITY 4 Improved sustainability and productivity of existing agricultural lands and pasturelands 40 PRIORITY 5 Cover photos: Building the case for biodiversity ponsulak/Shutterstock (soybeans) Bento Viana/ISPN (palm and cut fruit) and landscape conservation 46 Paulo Vilela/Shutterstock (soy plants) Peter Caton/ISPN (baskets) Research agenda 49 Alf Ribeiro/Shutterstock (tractors) Conclusion 51 ABOUT THIS REPORT This document outlines a set of opportunities that can contribute to conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems, growth in agricultural production, and support for social inclusion and traditional livelihoods in Brazil’s Cerrado biome for the future of the region. It was prepared by CEA Consulting at the request of the Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA), a philanthropic collaborative of the ClimateWorks Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. It was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the ClimateWorks Foundation. The intended audience for this report is the full range of stakeholders working in the Cerrado biome; the recommendations included here are not designed for any particular actor and in fact would necessarily need to be undertaken by many different actors. -
Green Economy in Amapá State, Brazil Progress and Perspectives
Green economy in Amapá State, Brazil Progress and perspectives Virgilio Viana, Cecilia Viana, Ana Euler, Maryanne Grieg-Gran and Steve Bass Country Report Green economy Keywords: June 2014 green growth; green economy policy; environmental economics; participation; payments for environmental services About the author Virgilio Viana is Chief Executive of the Fundação Amazonas Sustentável (Sustainable Amazonas Foundation) and International Fellow of IIED Cecilia Viana is a consultant and a doctoral student at the Center for Sustainable Development, University of Brasília Ana Euler is President-Director of the Amapá State Forestry Institute and Researcher at Embrapa-AP Maryanne Grieg-Gran is Principal Researcher (Economics) at IIED Steve Bass is Head of IIED’s Sustainable Markets Group Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many participants at the two seminars on green economy in Amapá held in Macapá in March 2012 and March 2013, for their ideas and enthusiasm; the staff of the Fundação Amazonas Sustentável for organising the trip of Amapá government staff to Amazonas; and Laura Jenks of IIED for editorial and project management assistance. The work was made possible by financial support to IIED from UK Aid; however the opinions in this paper are not necessarily those of the UK Government. Produced by IIED’s Sustainable Markets Group The Sustainable Markets Group drives IIED’s efforts to ensure that markets contribute to positive social, environmental and economic outcomes. The group brings together IIED’s work on market governance, business models, market failure, consumption, investment and the economics of climate change. Published by IIED, June 2014 Virgilio Viana, Cecilia Viana, Ana Euler, Maryanne Grieg-Gran and Steve Bass. -
Conservation Versus Development at the Iguacu National Park, Brazil1
CONSERVATION VERSUS DEVELOPMENT AT THE IGUACU NATIONAL PARK, BRAZIL1 Ramon Arigoni Ortiz a a Research Professor at BC3 – Basque Centre for Climate Change – Bilbao – Spain Alameda Urquijo, 4 Piso 4 – 48009 – [email protected] Abstract The Iguacu National Park is a conservation unit that protects the largest remnant area of the Atlantic Rainforest in Brazil. The Colono Road is 17.6 km long road crossing the Iguacu National Park that has been the motive of dispute between environmentalists, government bodies and NGOs defending the closure of the Colono Road; and organised civil institutions representing the population of the surrounding cities defending its opening. In October 2003, 300 people invaded the Park in an attempt to remove the vegetation and reopen the road, which was prevented by members of the Brazilian Army and Federal Police. Those who advocate the reopening of the Colono Road claim significant economic losses imposed on the surrounding cities. This paper investigates this claim and concludes that a possible reopening of the Colono Road cannot be justified from an economic perspective. Keywords: Iguacu Park; Brazil; Colono Road; economic development; environmental degradation; valuation; cost-benefit analysis 1 WWF-Brazil provided the financial support to this work, which I am grateful. However, WWF-Brazil is not responsible for the results and opinions in this study. I am also grateful to two anonymous referees for their constructive comments, corrections and suggestions. The remaining errors and omissions are responsibility of the author solely. Ambientalia vol. 1 (2009-2010) 141-160 1 Arigoni, R. 1. INTRODUCTION sentence. The Colono Road remained closed until The Iguacu National Park is a conservation May 1997 when an entity named ´Friends of the unit located in Parana State, south region of Brazil Park´ (Movimento de Amigos do Parque) (Figure 1), comprising an area of 185,000 ha. -
The Relevance of the Cerrado's Water
THE RELEVANCE OF THE CERRADO’S WATER RESOURCES TO THE BRAZILIAN DEVELOPMENT Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima1; Euzebio Medrado da Silva1; Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho1; Eder de Souza Martins1; Adriana Reatto1; Vinicius Bof Bufon1 1 Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, km 18, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil, 70670-305. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cerrado (Brazilian savanna) is the second largest Brazilian biome (204 million hectares) and due to its location in the Brazilian Central Plateau it plays an important role in terms of water production and distribution throughout the country. Eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this Biome. It contributes to more than 90% of the discharge of the São Francisco River, 50% of the Paraná River, and 70% of the Tocantins River. Therefore, the Cerrado is a strategic region for the national hydropower sector, being responsible for more than 50% of the Brazilian hydroelectricity production. Furthermore, it has an outstanding relevance in the national agricultural scenery. Despite of the relatively abundance of water in most of the region, water conflicts are beginning to arise in some areas. The objective of this paper is to discuss the economical and ecological relevance of the water resources of the Cerrado. Key-words: Brazilian savanna; water management; water conflicts. INTRODUCTION The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome in extension, with about 204 million hectares, occupying 24% of the national territory approximately. Its largest portion is located within the Brazilian Central Plateau which consists of higher altitude areas in the central part of the country. -
The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil
The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil Pantanal Program Mônica Harris, Erika Guimarães, George Camargo, Cláudia Arcângelo, Elaine Pinto Cerrado Program Ricardo Machado, Mario Barroso, Cristiano Nogueira CI in Brazil • Active since 1988. • Two Hotspots: Atlantic Forest and Cerrado • Three Wilderness Areas: Amazon, Pantanal and Caatinga • Marine Program Cerrado overview • 2,000,000 km2 Savannah • approximately 4,400 of its 10,000 plant species occur nowhere else in the world • 75% loss of the original vegetation cover • Waters from the Cerrado drain into the lower Pantanal Pantanal overview • A 140,000 km2 central floodplain surrounded by a highland belt of Cerrado • Home for at least: – 3,500 species of plants –300fishes –652 birds –102 mammals – 177 reptiles – 40 amphibians • Largest wetland in the world, with extremely high densities of several large vertebrate species The Cerrado – Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor – The Beginning: • Priority Setting Workshop for the Cerrado and the Pantanal (1998) • Partnership:CI, Ministry for the Environment, Funatura, Biodiversitas and UnB. • Priority areas were identified for biodiversity conservation by 250 specialists TheThe ResultsResults:: Priority Areas for the Conservation of the Cerrado and Pantanal Corredores de Biodiversidade Cerrado / Pantanal CorridorsCorridors Chapada dos Guimarães betweenbetween # # thethe CerradoCerrado # Unidade de conservação Pantanal Matogrossense andand thethe Áreas prioritárias Taquaril Emas Rios # Corredores propostos PantanalPantanal Pantanal Rio -
Road Impact on Habitat Loss Br-364 Highway in Brazil
ROAD IMPACT ON HABITAT LOSS BR-364 HIGHWAY IN BRAZIL 2004 to 2011 ROAD IMPACT ON HABITAT LOSS BR-364 HIGHWAY IN BRAZIL 2004 to 2011 March 2012 Content Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Area of Study ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Habitat Change Monitoring ........................................................................................................................ 8 Previous studies ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Terra-i Monitoring in Brazil ..................................................................................................................... 9 Road Impact .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Areas ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Carbon Stocks and Biodiversity ............................................................................................................. 17 Future Habitat Change Scenarios ............................................................................................................ -
Caracterização Pedológica Das Unidades Regionais Do Estado Do Acre República Federativa Do Brasil
'---~ '~ Mlnlsténo , da Agncultul"II e do Abastecimento ISSN 0100-9915 Janeiro, 2000 Número, 29 CARACTERIZAÇÃO PEDOLÓGICA DAS UNIDADES REGIONAIS DO ESTADO DO ACRE REPÚBLICA FEDERATIVA DO BRASIL Presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA E DO ABASTECIMENTO Ministro Marcus Vinicius Pratinl de Moraes EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA Diretor-Presidente Alberto Duque Portugal Diretores-Executivos Elza Ângela Battaggia Brito da Cunha Dante Daniel Giacomelll Scolarl José Roberto Rodrigues Peres EMBRAPA ACRE Chefe Geral Ivandir Soares Campos Chefe Adjunto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento João Batista Martiniano Per.ira Chefe Adjunto de Comunicação, Negócios e Apoio Evandro Orfanó Flguelredo Chefe Adjunto de Administração Milcíades Heitor de Abreu Pardo ISSN 0100-9915 Circular Técnica ~ 29 Janeiro, 2000 CARACTERIZAÇÃO PEDOLÓGICA DAS UNIDADES REGIONAIS DO ESTADO DO ACRE Eufran Ferreira do Amaral B Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária Embrapa Acre Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento Embrapa Acre. Circular Técnica, 29. Exemplares desta publicação podem ser solicitados à Embrapa Acre Rodovia BR-364, km 14, sentido Rio Branco/Porto Velho Caixa Postal, 392 CEP 69908-970, Rio Branco-AC Telefones (068) 224-3931, 224-3932, 224-3933, 224-4035 Fax: (068) 224-4035 [email protected] Tiragem: 300 exemplares Com itê de Publicações Edson Patto Pacheco Elias Meio de Miranda Francisco José da Silva Lédo Geraldo de Meio Moura Ivandir Soares Campos Jaílton da Costa Carneiro Jair Carvalho dos Santos João Alencar de Sousa Marcílio José Thomazini Mauricília Pereira da Silva - Secretária Murilo Fazolin - Presidente Rita de Cássia Alves Pereira Tarcísio Marcos de Souza Gondim Expediente Coordenação Editorial: Murilo Fazolin Normalização Orlane da Silva Maia Copydesk Claudia Carvalho Sena / Suely Moreira de Meio Diagramação e Arte Final Fernando Farias Sevá AMARAL, E.F. -
Brazilian Amazon)
BRAZILIAN FORESTRY LEGISLATION AND TO COMBAT DEFORESTATION GOVERNMENT POLICIES IN THE AMAZON (BRAZILIAN AMAZON) THIAGO BANDEIRA CASTELO1 1 Introduction The forest legislation can be understood as a set of laws governing the relations of exploitation and use of forest resources. In Brazil, the first devices aimed at protected areas or resources have his record even in the colonial period, where the main objective was to guarantee control over the management of certain features such as vegetation, water and soil. Since then, the forest legislation has been undergoing constant changes (Medeiros, 2005) that directly affect the actors linked to the management, as the te- chnical institutions that monitor and control the exploitation of environmental areas, as well as researchers working in the area. In this scenario, the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) (Law 7,735/1989) has been active in protecting the environment, ensuring the sustainable use of natural resources and promoting environmental quality nationwide. However, the need for decentralization of administrative actions of IBAMA, due to the large size of Brazil that overloads the supervisory actions of the body, led to publication of the Law 11,284/2006 of public forest management, which regulates the management decentralization process Union forest to the states and municipalities. Subsequent to this, the rural actors such as farmers and entrepreneurs with political support from government wards opened the discussions on the reform of the main legal instrument of legislation - The Forest Code. New forms that aim to address the growing need of the country in parallel with the environmental protection have been placed under discussion. -
Download Bulletin
BULLETIN 18 July 31, 2020 Covid-19: Samuele Schirò/pixabay Public Policies and Society’s Responses Quality information for refining public policies and saving lives Policy Briefing Note 18 Pandemic remains severe, public policies fail, and compliance to social distancing decreases. Brazilian tragedy quickly approaches the 100,000 deaths mark. New actions are necessary Conclusions • Over 660 thousand lives have been lost and 17 million people have been infected around the world, equivalent to the population of the Netherlands or Ecuador. With almost 100,000 lives lost, Brazil has the second-highest death toll in the world. • AllBrazilianstates,withoutexception,areatthehighestriskstageswhenclassifiedunderthecriteria of the Harvard Global Health Institute, measured by the 7-day average of new Covid-19 cases. • 25 states relaxed social distancing measures between May and July. Several state governors have relaxed their policies even with rising infection and death rates, with the 7-day average new daily deaths at least 100% higher in June than in May in 17 states. • TestingdataandstateexpendituresconfirmthatmostBrazilianstateshavechosentouseserological tests, also known as rapid tests, not considered the optimal option for accurate diagnoses and controlling the pandemic. • Public policies adopted by the states were not part of integrated strategies grounded in mass testing programs and tracing infected individuals and their personal contacts. • Regularproductionanddisclosureofdatabythestateshaveimproved,albeitstillinsufficientto design and implement high-quality public policies. 1 Solidary Research Network - Bulletin 18 July 31, 2020 • There was a gradual decline in compliance with stay-at-home orders by the population. Mobility levels in July remained practically the same from mid-March levels. • The omission of the Federal Government in drafting a national strategy remains at the root of the states’ disarticulated responses and community behavior. -
In Search of the Amazon: Brazil, the United States, and the Nature of A
IN SEARCH OF THE AMAZON AMERICAN ENCOUNTERS/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS A series edited by Gilbert M. Joseph and Emily S. Rosenberg This series aims to stimulate critical perspectives and fresh interpretive frameworks for scholarship on the history of the imposing global pres- ence of the United States. Its primary concerns include the deployment and contestation of power, the construction and deconstruction of cul- tural and political borders, the fluid meanings of intercultural encoun- ters, and the complex interplay between the global and the local. American Encounters seeks to strengthen dialogue and collaboration between histo- rians of U.S. international relations and area studies specialists. The series encourages scholarship based on multiarchival historical research. At the same time, it supports a recognition of the represen- tational character of all stories about the past and promotes critical in- quiry into issues of subjectivity and narrative. In the process, American Encounters strives to understand the context in which meanings related to nations, cultures, and political economy are continually produced, chal- lenged, and reshaped. IN SEARCH OF THE AMAzon BRAZIL, THE UNITED STATES, AND THE NATURE OF A REGION SETH GARFIELD Duke University Press Durham and London 2013 © 2013 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by Heather Hensley Typeset in Scala by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in - Publication Data Garfield, Seth. In search of the Amazon : Brazil, the United States, and the nature of a region / Seth Garfield. pages cm—(American encounters/global interactions) Includes bibliographical references and index. -
Soy and Cattle: Report 7
Report 7 November 2019 1 Executive Summary This report presents 12 cases of land clearing based on alerts data from DETER (System for Monitoring Deforestation on Real Time) and PRODES (Program for Deforestation Calculation) observed between 27 August 2019 and 26 September 2019, in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado biomes. Land clearing alerts considered in this report were visually confirmed. Eight of the selected cases are in the Amazon biome, and four are in the Cerrado biome. Cleared land per municipality of all cases included in this report (in hectares) Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) Cumaru do Norte (Pará) São Félix do Xingu (Pará) Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) Damianópolis (Goiás) Terminology Barreiras (Bahia) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Amazon (18,232 ha) Cerrado (4,685 ha) Rapid Response Soy & Cattle – Report 7 – November 2019 2 Table of Contents Amazon Biome 1. Fazenda Rio Preto I e II – Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) .................... 4 2. Fazenda Rio Dourado – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ........................................ 7 3. Fazenda Nossa Senhora da Medalha – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) ............... 10 4. Fazenda Cabocla – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ................................................ 12 5. Fazenda Brusque do Xingu – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) …………………..….…… 15 6. Fazenda Macuco – Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) …………………………………..…… 18 7. Fazenda Nove de Julho – Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) ……………………………...… 20 8. Fazenda São José I – Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) ………................…. 23 Cerrado Biome 9. Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 02 and Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 03 – Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) ……………………………………………………………………… 25 10. Fazenda Grotão – Damianópolis (Goiás) ……………………………………….……….