DOCSLIB.ORG

CERRADO BIOME an Assessment Developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CERRADO BIOME an Assessment Developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AND SOCIAL INCLUSION IN THE CERRADO BIOME An assessment developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME AREA OF DETAIL Brazil Sources: Reference layers: http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ Matopiba: http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/geociencias/default_prod.shtm Cerrado Biome: http://maps.lapig.iesa.ufg.br/lapig.html Photo: CEA CONTENTS About this report 2 Executive summary 3 Introduction 13 Proposed priorities 18 PRIORITY 1 Strong implementation of the Forest Code 18 PRIORITY 2 Protection and management of community and conservation lands 26 PRIORITY 3 Incentives for conservation 36 PRIORITY 4 Improved sustainability and productivity of existing agricultural lands and pasturelands 40 PRIORITY 5 Cover photos: Building the case for biodiversity ponsulak/Shutterstock (soybeans) Bento Viana/ISPN (palm and cut fruit) and landscape conservation 46 Paulo Vilela/Shutterstock (soy plants) Peter Caton/ISPN (baskets) Research agenda 49 Alf Ribeiro/Shutterstock (tractors) Conclusion 51 ABOUT THIS REPORT This document outlines a set of opportunities that can contribute to conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems, growth in agricultural production, and support for social inclusion and traditional livelihoods in Brazil’s Cerrado biome for the future of the region. It was prepared by CEA Consulting at the request of the Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA), a philanthropic collaborative of the ClimateWorks Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. It was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the ClimateWorks Foundation. The intended audience for this report is the full range of stakeholders working in the Cerrado biome; the recommendations included here are not designed for any particular actor and in fact would necessarily need to be undertaken by many different actors. This report was developed through an extended This document is accompanied by several research and consultation process, lasting from supporting documents that the authors hope early 2015 to mid-2016. We reviewed dozens will provide a repository of information on the of publications, drew from a broad set of data Cerrado biome. These materials specifically sources, conducted roughly one hundred expert address and include: interviews, consulted with approximately fifty • Biodiversity stakeholders through three separate review workshops, and conducted site visits. The authors • Hydrology are solely responsible for the report’s content, • Trends in deforestation and associated carbon including any errors. However, the report would emissions not have been possible without the many people • Social and political contexts who contributed to this project, and we extend our • Trends in the agricultural sector warmest gratitude for their help. • Funding sources • Corporate deforestation commitments • Maps of the region These materials can be found at: www.climateandlandusealliance.org/reports/ cerrado/ Suggested Citation: Credits: Dickie, A., Magno, I., Giampietro, J., Dolginow, A. GreenInfo Network, maps 2016. “Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Imaginary Office, design Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado CEA and ISPN, photography Biome.” CEA Consulting. Authors: Amy Dickie Iran Magno James Giampietro Alex Dolginow Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado Biome 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Cerrado biome is a dynamic, mosaic landscape that spans the center of Brazil. It is one of the largest and most biologically diverse tropical savannas in the world, has a rich social and cultural history, is home to a wide variety of indigenous peoples and traditional communities, and is an important region for the provisioning of freshwater across Brazil. Since the 1970s, agribusiness has been steadily and livestock sectors in the region through the expanding across the Cerrado biome, contributing Agricultural Development Plan Matopiba (PDA- to Brazil’s emergence as a global leader in agri- MATOPIBA) (Decree 8447, May 2015). Although cultural commodity production. As a result, nearly the details of this plan have not yet been formal- half the biome has been deforested.1 Continued ized, it clearly aims to spur growth in large-scale agricultural productivity within the Cerrado that agriculture in the region, primarily through expan- supports economic development and also works sion of transportation infrastructure. It has been in harmony with thriving traditional livelihoods heavily criticized by civil society organizations for and conservation of native habitat is important for being formulated with limited consultation and the long-term health and prosperity of the biome. transparency and for not including social and envi- Achievement of these multiple objectives will be ronmental representation on its governing body.3 challenging and will require a significant increase (See callout box on next page.) in resources, attention, and political will devoted to the region; however, the tools and frameworks exist to achieve this vision. The health and pros- perity of the Cerrado biome is a matter of national importance. Given the central role that the Cerrado plays in food and water security and the region’s rich social diversity and cultural heritage, the Cerrado agenda cannot be separated from the national agenda. Today, Matopiba—the northern portion of the Cerrado where the majority of the biome’s intact native habitat is found—is one of the primary agricultural frontiers in Brazil.2 This landscape is the last great expanse of the Cerrado biome that has not been converted to large-scale mechanized Photo: CEA agriculture. The Ministry of Agriculture (MAPA) is actively supporting the growth of the agriculture 1. Rene Beuchle et al., “Land Cover Changes in the Brazilian 4. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), “Ecosystem Cerrado and Caatinga Biomes from 1990 to 2010 Based on Profile: Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot,” April 2016. a Systemic Remote Sensing Sampling Approach,” Applied 5. Agroecology is the integrative study of the ecology of the Geography 58 (2015): 116–127. entire food system, encompassing ecological, economic, and 2. Matopiba is named for the initial letters of the states that social dimensions. Charles Francis et al., “Agroecology: the compose the region: Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí, and Bahia. Ecology of Food Systems,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3. Talise Rocha, “Plano para Desenvolvimento Agropecuário 22, no. 3 (2003): 99–118. no Matopiba e Questionado,” Observatorio ABC, October 2015. Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado Biome 3 PDA-MATOPIBA aims to boost the trend seen • compliance with existing environmental and over the last several years of large-scale agribusi- community rights laws; nesses advancing into the region to produce soy • reconciliation of long-standing land claims and other agricultural commodities for export. At and disputes; the same time, another vision for this landscape is • official recognition of traditional people’s being championed by the traditional cultures and and rural communities’ claims over lands and historical communities of the Matopiba region territories; (e.g., indigenous people, quilombolas, extractiv- ists, geraizeiros, ribeirinhos, and family farmers). • secure land tenure for both private owners This vision is for the continued development and and communities; economic flourishing of a wide diversity of agricul- • improved management of existing conserva- tural systems across the landscape. Most of these tion units (including sustainable use and full systems are small in scale, have been practiced in protection); the region for generations, operate in accordance • robust implementation of agribusiness with the principles of agroecological production,5 commitments to zero- or zero-net- and coexist well with natural habitat in complex deforestation supply chains; mosaics. These communities, their lands, and their • support for traditional agriculture and way of life are threatened by PDA-MATOPIBA agroecological practices and markets; and by the expansion of large-scale agriculture generally. • expansion of low-carbon agricultural practices and sustainable intensification of pasturelands; To build toward a future Cerrado that maintains and ecological integrity, biodiversity, carbon stores, • continuous improvements to monitoring and and a diversified set of agricultural systems, the mapping of natural resources in the Cerrado expansion of large-scale agricultural needs to be (including forests, native vegetation, soils, both constrained and guided to areas where it will biodiversity, and water). displace the least biologically and socially valuable resources. Careful planning for the region should Effective implementation of these strategies allow for large-scale agriculture to grow and con- depends upon leadership, collaboration, and tribute to rural economic development in a way commitment—across a range of government, that harmonizes with other uses of the landscape private sector, community, and civil society stake- and other economic development pathways. holders. It will not be easy, especially given the current instability in Brazil’s political and economic This report outlines five high-level strategies that, climate. Yet together, the strategies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Relevance of the Cerrado's Water
    THE RELEVANCE OF THE CERRADO’S WATER RESOURCES TO THE BRAZILIAN DEVELOPMENT Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima1; Euzebio Medrado da Silva1; Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho1; Eder de Souza Martins1; Adriana Reatto1; Vinicius Bof Bufon1 1 Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, km 18, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil, 70670-305. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cerrado (Brazilian savanna) is the second largest Brazilian biome (204 million hectares) and due to its location in the Brazilian Central Plateau it plays an important role in terms of water production and distribution throughout the country. Eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this Biome. It contributes to more than 90% of the discharge of the São Francisco River, 50% of the Paraná River, and 70% of the Tocantins River. Therefore, the Cerrado is a strategic region for the national hydropower sector, being responsible for more than 50% of the Brazilian hydroelectricity production. Furthermore, it has an outstanding relevance in the national agricultural scenery. Despite of the relatively abundance of water in most of the region, water conflicts are beginning to arise in some areas. The objective of this paper is to discuss the economical and ecological relevance of the water resources of the Cerrado. Key-words: Brazilian savanna; water management; water conflicts. INTRODUCTION The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome in extension, with about 204 million hectares, occupying 24% of the national territory approximately. Its largest portion is located within the Brazilian Central Plateau which consists of higher altitude areas in the central part of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil
    The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil Pantanal Program Mônica Harris, Erika Guimarães, George Camargo, Cláudia Arcângelo, Elaine Pinto Cerrado Program Ricardo Machado, Mario Barroso, Cristiano Nogueira CI in Brazil • Active since 1988. • Two Hotspots: Atlantic Forest and Cerrado • Three Wilderness Areas: Amazon, Pantanal and Caatinga • Marine Program Cerrado overview • 2,000,000 km2 Savannah • approximately 4,400 of its 10,000 plant species occur nowhere else in the world • 75% loss of the original vegetation cover • Waters from the Cerrado drain into the lower Pantanal Pantanal overview • A 140,000 km2 central floodplain surrounded by a highland belt of Cerrado • Home for at least: – 3,500 species of plants –300fishes –652 birds –102 mammals – 177 reptiles – 40 amphibians • Largest wetland in the world, with extremely high densities of several large vertebrate species The Cerrado – Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor – The Beginning: • Priority Setting Workshop for the Cerrado and the Pantanal (1998) • Partnership:CI, Ministry for the Environment, Funatura, Biodiversitas and UnB. • Priority areas were identified for biodiversity conservation by 250 specialists TheThe ResultsResults:: Priority Areas for the Conservation of the Cerrado and Pantanal Corredores de Biodiversidade Cerrado / Pantanal CorridorsCorridors Chapada dos Guimarães betweenbetween # # thethe CerradoCerrado # Unidade de conservação Pantanal Matogrossense andand thethe Áreas prioritárias Taquaril Emas Rios # Corredores propostos PantanalPantanal Pantanal Rio
    [Show full text]
  • Soy and Cattle: Report 7
    Report 7 November 2019 1 Executive Summary This report presents 12 cases of land clearing based on alerts data from DETER (System for Monitoring Deforestation on Real Time) and PRODES (Program for Deforestation Calculation) observed between 27 August 2019 and 26 September 2019, in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado biomes. Land clearing alerts considered in this report were visually confirmed. Eight of the selected cases are in the Amazon biome, and four are in the Cerrado biome. Cleared land per municipality of all cases included in this report (in hectares) Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) Cumaru do Norte (Pará) São Félix do Xingu (Pará) Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) Damianópolis (Goiás) Terminology Barreiras (Bahia) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Amazon (18,232 ha) Cerrado (4,685 ha) Rapid Response Soy & Cattle – Report 7 – November 2019 2 Table of Contents Amazon Biome 1. Fazenda Rio Preto I e II – Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) .................... 4 2. Fazenda Rio Dourado – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ........................................ 7 3. Fazenda Nossa Senhora da Medalha – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) ............... 10 4. Fazenda Cabocla – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ................................................ 12 5. Fazenda Brusque do Xingu – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) …………………..….…… 15 6. Fazenda Macuco – Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) …………………………………..…… 18 7. Fazenda Nove de Julho – Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) ……………………………...… 20 8. Fazenda São José I – Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) ………................…. 23 Cerrado Biome 9. Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 02 and Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 03 – Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) ……………………………………………………………………… 25 10. Fazenda Grotão – Damianópolis (Goiás) ……………………………………….……….
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Brazil's Southeast Region: Limitations and Future Challenges to Development
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics de Castro, César Nunes Working Paper Agriculture in Brazil's Southeast region: Limitations and future challenges to development Texto para Discussão, No. 1952a Provided in Cooperation with: Institute of Applied Economic Research (ipea), Brasília Suggested Citation: de Castro, César Nunes (2014) : Agriculture in Brazil's Southeast region: Limitations and future challenges to development, Texto para Discussão, No. 1952a, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), Brasília This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/121530 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu capa_1952a.pdf 1 29/05/2014 10:05:02 Ipea’s mission Enhance public policies that are essential to Brazilian development by producing and disseminating knowledge and by advising the state in its strategic decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expansion of Irrigated Agriculture in Brazil and the Potential Regional Limitations1
    THE EXPANSION OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE IN BRAZIL AND THE POTENTIAL REGIONAL LIMITATIONS1 Angel dos Santos Fachinelli Ferrarini2 Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho3 Santiago Vianna Cuadra4 Daniel de Castro Victoria5 Summary Regional expansion of irrigated agriculture causes a growth in food production in the country, minimizes risks for the farmer and strengthens food security for future generations. However, at the same time, it has a damaging effect on water availability, via demands for water use, which may intensify situations of microregional water scarcity6. The TERM-BR model was used to simulate expansion scenarios in irrigated areas, aiming at verifying the impact in the water use for 2025. Scenarios were adapted from the National Water Resources Plan (PNRH) and simulations were carried out for areas deemed potentially suitable for irrigation based on the Ministry of National Integration report (MI). Irrigated agriculture was separated from dry farming in terms of differential productivity. The Climatic Water Balance (CWB) was estimated for Northeastern States in order to compare regional water supply and demand. Results for the Brazil regions suggest that the greater impact on the GDP, investment and use of regional families would take place in the state of Mato Grosso, in the Midwest region of the country. The comparative result of the CWB and the TERM- BR model for states in the Northeastern region point to potential water availability problems in the states of Alagoas and Pernambuco in particular. Introduction The irrigated agriculture area has been growing constantly for the last 20 years in Brazil. The Brazilian Agricultural Census has registered a total of 1,959,810 irrigated hectares in 1985 and 4,545,532 hectares in 2006, a growth of 132% during the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Plano De Ação Para Prevenção E Controle Do Desmatamento E Das Queimadas No Estado Do Maranhão
    Governo do Estado do Maranhão Casa Civil Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais Grupo Permanente de Trabalho Interinstitucional PLANO DE AÇÃO PARA PREVENÇÃO E CONTROLE DO DESMATAMENTO E DAS QUEIMADAS NO ESTADO DO MARANHÃO (Decreto nº 27.317, de 14 de abril de 2011) São Luis, Maranhão Novembro de 2011 ROSEANA SARNEY Governadora do Estado do Maranhão WASHINGTON LUIZ DE OLIVEIRA Vice-Governador LUIS FERNANDO MOURA DA SILVA Secretário-Chefe da Casa Civil CARLOS VICTOR GUTERRES MENDES Secretário de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais HILDO AUGUSTO DA ROCHA NETO Secretário de Estado de Assuntos Políticos CONCEIÇÃO DE MARIA CARVALHO DE ANDRADE Secretária de Estado do Desenvolvimento Agrário e Agricultura Familiar FRANCISCO ASSIS CASTRO GOMES Secretário de Estado do Desenvolvimento Social JURANDIR FERRO DO LAGO FILHO Secretário de Estado do Turismo CLÁUDIO DONISETE AZEVEDO Secretário de Estado da Agricultura, Pecuária e Pesca OLGA MARIA LENZA SIMÃO Secretária de Estado da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior JOÃO BERNARDO BRINGEL Secretário de Estado da Educação JOSÉ MAURÍCIO DE MACEDO SANTOS Secretário de Estado do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio CARLOS ALBERTO FRANCO DE ALMEIDA Secretário Extraordinário de Assuntos Estratégicos FÁBIO GONDIM PEREIRA DA COSTA Secretário de Estado do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão JOSÉ AUGUSTO SILVA OLIVEIRA Universidade Estadual do Maranhão 2 Grupo Permanente de Trabalho Interinstitucional Casa Civil Luis Francisco de Assis Léda Maria Odinéa Melo Santos Ribeiro Secretaria de
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 12 the Cerrados of Brazil.Pdf
    00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page i The Cerrados of Brazil 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page ii 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iii The Cerrados of Brazil Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna Editors Paulo S. Oliveira Robert J. Marquis Columbia University Press New York 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iv Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex © 2002 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The cerrados of Brazil : ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna / Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-231-12042-7 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0-231-12043-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Cerrado ecology—Brazil. I. Oliveira, Paulo S., 1957– II. Marquis, Robert J., 1953– QH117 .C52 2002 577.4'8'0981—dc21 2002022739 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page v Contents Preface vii 1 Introduction: Development of Research in the Cerrados 1 Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis I Historical Framework and the Abiotic Environment 2 Relation of Soils and Geomorphic Surfaces in the Brazilian Cerrado 13 Paulo E. F. Motta, Nilton Curi, and Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Brazil and Argentina: Developments and Prospects for Major Field Crops
    Chapter 2 A Comparison of Economic and Agricultural Settings Introduction Brazil and the United States have large domestic markets that consume most of their agricultural rgentina, Brazil, and the United States have output. For the United States, export markets are an Acompeted in international agricultural markets for important but residual destination for much of its decades. However, a very different set of demographic, cereal and oilseed (and products) output. In Brazil’s geographic, and economic circumstances underlies case, international markets compete more directly each country’s competitive position. This chapter with domestic markets as a source of demand. With a provides some perspective to the differences and simi- relatively small population, Argentina relies most larities that distinguish these three agricultural directly on international markets as an outlet for its competitors. In addition, it sets the stage for a later grain and oilseed production. discussion of agricultural development in Argentina and Brazil by comparing their population and Abundant Land Base Strikes a economic characteristics, land base, the climate Common Theme for each country’s principal areas of agricultural production, and finally, the transportation and The combined total land area of 1.1 billion hectares marketing infrastructure. for Argentina and Brazil is 22 percent larger than U.S. area. Yet they are almost identical to the United States Agriculture’s Economic Role in area devoted to agricultural activities—about 419 Differs Sharply million hectares in 1998 (table B-2). However, only 78 million hectares were involved in field crop production The U.S. economy is both huge (in terms of aggregate in these two countries in 1998, compared with 177 GDP) and wealthy (in terms of GDP per capita).
    [Show full text]
  • Production and Protection: a First Look at Key Challenges in Brazil
    Executive Summary PRODUCTION AND PROTECTION: A FIRST LOOK AT KEY CHALLENGES IN BRAZIL Climate Policy Initiative December 2013 Brazil has vast natural resources that carry immense area they covered in 1985. Today, Brazil has a relatively potential for the country's economic and environmental consolidated institutional framework and well-established goals. As in many other nations, there is frequent instruments for the protection of natural resources in tension between these goals, compounded by rising public lands. These have been extensively used in the pressures from increasing global demand for food, along Amazon. However, challenges remain in the protection with climate change risk. Using land eciently is crucial of native vegetation cleared in small increments, on to achieve both sets of goals. Yet, the promotion of private property, and with Brazil's ecosystems beyond ecient land use still stands as a great challenge. the Amazon, while sustainable forestry is underdeveloped. A Production and Protection (P&P) strategy is an integrated approach towards land use intended to help Ways forward to address these challenges include: address these challenges. This report applies a P&P framework to Brazil to understand where land can be • Improve existing monitoring techniques to used more eciently across important sectors within the adequately deal with small-scale Amazon country. deforestation. Once driven by large-scale forest clearings, Amazon deforestation currently results We nd that there is ample scope for enhanced primarily from the cutting down of forest in small protection of natural resources and growth of increments (see Figure 1). This is likely a symptom of agricultural production in Brazil within a P&P some of the technical shortcomings of Brazil's current framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine
    remote sensing Article Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine Carlos M. Souza Jr. 1,* , Julia Z. Shimbo 2, Marcos R. Rosa 3 , Leandro L. Parente 4 , Ane A. Alencar 2 , Bernardo F. T. Rudorff 5 , Heinrich Hasenack 6 , Marcelo Matsumoto 7 , Laerte G. Ferreira 4, Pedro W. M. Souza-Filho 8 , Sergio W. de Oliveira 9, Washington F. Rocha 10 , Antônio V. Fonseca 1 , Camila B. Marques 2, Cesar G. Diniz 11 , Diego Costa 10 , Dyeden Monteiro 12, Eduardo R. Rosa 13 , Eduardo Vélez-Martin 6 , Eliseu J. Weber 14 , Felipe E. B. Lenti 2 , Fernando F. Paternost 13, Frans G. C. Pareyn 15, João V. Siqueira 16, José L. Viera 15, Luiz C. Ferreira Neto 11, Marciano M. Saraiva 5 , Marcio H. Sales 17, Moises P. G. Salgado 5 , Rodrigo Vasconcelos 10, Soltan Galano 10, Vinicius V. Mesquita 4 and Tasso Azevedo 18 1 Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (Imazon), Belém 66055-200, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (Ipam), Brasília 70863-520, Brazil; [email protected] (J.Z.S.); [email protected] (A.A.A.); [email protected] (C.B.M.); [email protected] (F.E.B.L.) 3 Programa de Pós-Gradução em Geografia Física, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil; [email protected] 4 Image Processing and GIS Laboratory (LAPIG), Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiania 74001-970, Brazil; [email protected] (L.L.P.); [email protected] (L.G.F.); [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Program Cerrado Pantanal
    © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana FACTSHEET BR 2016 CERRADO Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © PANTANALPROGRAM © Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana THE WWF-BRAZIL WWF-Brazil is an environmental organization that works to conserve various Brazilian ecosystems, including two of South America’s most important regions: the Cerrado and the Pantanal. The Cerrado, Pantanal and Upper Paraguay River Basin are included in WWF’s 35 global priority places. This vast area is the focus of our conservation work undertaken through the Cerrado Pantanal Program. © Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © CERRADO PANTANAL PRIORITY AREAS The Cerrado Ecoregion The Pantanal Ecoregion Upper Paraguay River Basin © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana CERRADO © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana Stretching across 11 states and the Federal District, the Cerrado is South America’s second largest phytogeographic domain. It can also be found in the states of Roraima, Amapá, Amazonas and Pará and partially covers Bolivia and Paraguay. The Cerrado covers roughly 25% of the country and is one of the biologically richest savannas on the planet. The Cerrado is connected to four of Brazil’s five biomes – the Amazon, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Pantanal. It is regarded as the “cradle” of Brazil’s water resources, since it feeds not only Brazil’s major aquifers, but also six of the country’s eight river basins and the Pantanal. Area Over 2 million sq km Conservation Less than 10% of the Cerrado is covered by protected areas Biodiversity The
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's Changing Macroeconomic Conditions
    Brazil’s Changing Macroeconomic Conditions: Impacts on Agriculture Constanza Valdes, Kim Hjort, Ralph Seeley, ERS/USDA Corresponding author: Constanza Valdes ERS-USDA Email: [email protected] Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31-August 2 The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Copyright 2016 by Constanza Valdes, Kim Hjort, and Ralph Seeley. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 1 Brazil’s Changing Macroeconomic Conditions: Impacts on Agriculture Constanza Valdes, Kim Hjort, and Ralph Seeley Abstract Brazil has attained remarkable economic progress over the past decade with parallel modernization and expansion of its agricultural sector. With continuing productivity increases and the availability of additional land suitable for farming, further growth in agricultural production and exports has become the norm. However, current domestic macroeconomic challenges, including slow income growth, a depreciating Real, and administered prices to control inflation, are further challenged by adverse external events, including the substantial depreciation of China’s currency on prospects for soybean and beef exports. This confluence of domestic and foreign economic challenges will negatively impact the agricultural sector’s ability to continue the pace of its projected growth and may significantly slow export expansion. If that should happen, world food prices may rise unless other world market suppliers such as the United States can fill the deficit.
    [Show full text]