Agriculture in Matopiba

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agriculture in Matopiba Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado Biome Technical Annex: The Agriculture Sector, Agriculture Supply Chains, and Transportation Infrastructure August 2016 This technical annex accompanies the “Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado Biome” report, developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting. The full report and associated materials can be found at: www.climateandlandusealliance.org/reports/cerrado/v Table of Contents Introduction 3 Overview of agriculture in Brazil 6 Overview of agriculture in the Cerrado 12 Agriculture in Matopiba 16 Soy and the soy supply chain 27 The beef and milk supply chain 40 Pasture intensification 55 Agricultural certifications 61 Transportation infrastructure 65 2 AGRICULTURE This section was produced in partnership with AgroIcone 3 Agriculture in the Cerrado Historical background and overview • Beginning in the mid 1970s, agricultural production in the Cerrado expanded greatly – through a large scale national investment in agricultural research and development. Today, it is one of the most intensive and productive agricultural regions in the world. • In the twenty years between 1991 and 2011, the value of Brazil’s agricultural exports increased ten-fold, from USD 7.9 billion to USD 81 billion.1 The Cerrado has been at the heart of this growth. Today, the biome accounts for about 40 percent of the total GDP from Brazil’s agricultural sector.2 Notes on this section: • Much of the agricultural data is provided by state rather than biome, so much of the information presented here is not perfectly aligned to the biome. • Comprehensive information on the agricultural sector is limited by the fact that the latest Agricultural Census was published in 2006 and there are no current plans for another census. As a result, a number of the charts in this chapter only provide data through 2006. Sources: (1) FAOSTAT, 2015. (2) MMA, 2014. 4 Agriculture in the Cerrado Soy • Soy production has grown at a rapid clip in the past few decades. Planted area has tripled since the mid 1990s and export value has quadrupled since 2006. Soy accounts for almost 40% of Brazil’s agricultural exports, by value.1 • Of the Cerrado states, Mato Grosso has by far the most land area planted with soy, but Matopiba is growing in importance for soy production.2 Beef • Brazil has the largest commercial cattle herd in the world and is the #2 producer and exporter of beef globally. However, the majority of Brazil’s beef is consumed domestically.3 • The processing segments of the supply chain is highly concentrated for both soy and beef. • The beef sector is not growing as quickly as the soy sector. Slower growth and a trend towards intensification could free up land for crop expansion onto former pasture lands. Sources: Photos by CEA, from western Bahia. (1) MDIC, AgroIcone. (2) IBGE - Produção Agrícola Municipal, via AgroIcone. (3) USDA, 2015. 5 AGRICULTURE OVERVIEW OF AGRICULTURE IN BRAZIL 6 Brazil is a top global producer and exporter of agricultural commodities Brazil’s agriculture, world share 2014/2015, %1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1 Orange juice 1 • Brazil is important to world food production. 1 Sugar • Brazil leads world production 1 and export of orange juice, 2 Soybeans sugar, and coffee. 2 • It is second for production and 4 export of soybeans, producing Chickens 1 30% of the world’s soybeans and accounting for almost 40% 1 Indicates Coffee x of global soybean exports. 1 world rank • 2 Brazil is the world’s second top Beef exporter of beef. 2 3 Corn 2 Production 5 Exports Cotton 3 4 Pork 4 Source: Data from USDA. 7 Agriculture exports account for over 40% of Brazil’s total exports by value Brazil’s trade balance 300 5 year increments 1-year increments • Brazil has exported 250 about $100 billion USD worth of agricultural 200 commodities, on an annual basis, over the past few 150 years, and billion imported about US$ US$ $30 billion. 100 • Brazil’s total exports are worth about $230 billion 50 USD. • The agriculture sector is important 0 for maintaining Brazil’s trade 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 balance. Brazil Exp Total Brazil Imp Total Agribusiness Exp Agribusiness Imp Source: Ministério da Agricultura. Chart and text adapted from AgroIcone. 8 Agriculture is an important, but not leading, sector for foreign investment Foreign investment in Brazil $12 Metallic mineral extraction $10 Oil extraction and Brazil’s agriculture related services sector averaged USD $350 million in foreign $8 Agriculture, livestock and investment per year services related to these from 2007 to 2009, activities hitting almost USD Activities of suport the $6 $500 million in 2008. mineral extracion However, it lags far US $ Billion US behind mineral and oil Silviculture, Forest $4 exploitation extraction. Non-metallic mineral $2 extraction Fishing and acquaculture $0 Coal extraction Source: Bacen, http://www.bcb.gov.br/rex/ied/port/ingressos/htms/index1.asp?idpai=INVEDIR, via AgroIcone. 9 Soy and beef are the commodities most linked to deforestation, especially in Matopiba Soy export value - all of Brazil 35 30 Soy 25 • Soy production has grown at a rapid clip in the last 20 Soybean oil few decades. Planted 15 Soybean meal US $ Billions $ US area has tripled since the 10 Soybean mid-1990s. Soy accounts 5 for almost 40% of Brazil’s agricultural exports, by 0 value. 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1997 Beef export value - all of Brazil 8 7 6 Beef Salted meat 5 • Brazil has the largest Casings 4 commercial cattle herd in Offals US $ Billions $ US 3 the world and is the #2 Processed meat 2 producer and exporter of Fresh beef beef globally. 1 0 2006 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: MDIC, via AgroIcone. 10 Pesticides, nutrient pollution, soil erosion, and genetic engineering are significant concerns for Brazilian agriculture • Pesticides are a major concern in the Cerrado because of the human and ecosystem health impact. Brazil is now the world’s largest buyer of pesticides, and some pesticides that are outlawed in the United States and/or Europe are still allowed in the Cerrado, with pesticide companies and users arguing that the needs in the Cerrado’s tropical climate differ from those of more temperate regions. However, cases such as an accidental crop-dusting of a school which sent 30 children and teachers to the hospital have fueled a strong anti-pesticide movement.1 • Nutrient pollution from excess nitrogen and phosphorous from crop agriculture, is a growing concern in the Cerrado. These nutrients can pollute surface and groundwater (aquifers) and causing algae blooms that strangle aquatic ecosystems. Left unchecked, nitrogen pollution of drinking water sources can lead to major health effects such as “blue baby syndrome.”2 • Soil erosion impacts the long-term productivity of crops and pastures. Unchecked overgrazing in particular can cause erosion, compaction, and destruction, especially in sensitive riparian areas. Soil erosion also leads to significant carbon loss in the Cerrado. • Genetic engineering is a concern for many Brazilians because of its possible effects on human health and its potential to contaminate non-GMO crops. 60% of cotton, 54% of corn, and 91.8% of soy grown in Brazil are now genetically engineered.3,4 Sources: (1) Prade 2015. (2) Neto et al. 2011. (3) Thuswol 2013. (4) Reuters Brasil 2014. 11 AGRICULTURE OVERVIEW OF AGRICULTURE IN THE CERRADO 12 Cropland and pastureland currently account for almost half of the land cover in the Cerrado • The southern Cerrado states of Mato Grosso do Sul, Sao Paulo, and Goiás are dominated by pasture and croplands. • Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso are also used extensively for pasture and cropland. • The northern part of the biome is still largely covered with natural vegetation. Source: CEA and Greeninfo Network, using data from LAPIG Maps. 13 Agricultural production in the Cerrado states nearly doubled between 2005 and 2010 Total agricultural production in Cerrado states 900 800 700 • Major increases in crop 600 500 production occurred in the 400 Cerrado states between 2005 and 2010. 300 Millions of tonnesMillions 200 • Soy is one of the main 100 growth crops in the Cerrado, - and its planted area has 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2011 2012 2013 more than tripled since 1990. • The southern Cerrado’s Planted soy area by states - Cerrado planted soy area is far larger than Matopiba’s, but both 20 São Paulo are growing. 18 Minas Gerais 16 • Matopiba accounts for about Mato Grosso do Sul 14 16% of planted soy area in 12 Goiás the Cerrado. 10 Mato Grosso 8 Tocantins 6 Maranhão Millions of hectaresMillions 4 2 Piauí 0 Bahia 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Source: Pesquisa Agrícola Municipal, <http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/tabela/listabl.asp?c=1612&z=p&o=28> via AgroIcone, April 2015. 14 For sugarcane and soy, planted area (rather than productivity gains) has driven yield growth in recent years Soybean productivity in Cerrado and planted area Corn productivity in Cerrado and planted area 5 20 6 12 Yield: 108% Yield: 16% 18 Yield: 72% Yield: 39% 4 Area: 3% Area: 78% 16 5 10 Area: 3% Area: 28% 14 4 8 3 12 10 million hectares 3 6 thousandkg/ha million million hectares - - thousandkg/ha - - 2 8 2 4 6 1 4 1 2 2 Planted areaPlanted Productivity 0 0 areaPlanted 0 0 Productivity 2003 2010 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 1999 2010 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 Soybean planted area Soybean productivity Corn planted area Corn productivity Sugarcane productivity in Cerrado and planted area 100 9 Yield: 14% • Soybeans have the greatest planted area 90 Yield: -2% 8 Area: 31% Area: 113% in Brazil among the agricultural crops.
Recommended publications
  • CERRADO BIOME an Assessment Developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME
    CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AND SOCIAL INCLUSION IN THE CERRADO BIOME An assessment developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting August 2016 MAP 1: BRAZIL’S CERRADO BIOME AREA OF DETAIL Brazil Sources: Reference layers: http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ Matopiba: http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/geociencias/default_prod.shtm Cerrado Biome: http://maps.lapig.iesa.ufg.br/lapig.html Photo: CEA CONTENTS About this report 2 Executive summary 3 Introduction 13 Proposed priorities 18 PRIORITY 1 Strong implementation of the Forest Code 18 PRIORITY 2 Protection and management of community and conservation lands 26 PRIORITY 3 Incentives for conservation 36 PRIORITY 4 Improved sustainability and productivity of existing agricultural lands and pasturelands 40 PRIORITY 5 Cover photos: Building the case for biodiversity ponsulak/Shutterstock (soybeans) Bento Viana/ISPN (palm and cut fruit) and landscape conservation 46 Paulo Vilela/Shutterstock (soy plants) Peter Caton/ISPN (baskets) Research agenda 49 Alf Ribeiro/Shutterstock (tractors) Conclusion 51 ABOUT THIS REPORT This document outlines a set of opportunities that can contribute to conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems, growth in agricultural production, and support for social inclusion and traditional livelihoods in Brazil’s Cerrado biome for the future of the region. It was prepared by CEA Consulting at the request of the Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA), a philanthropic collaborative of the ClimateWorks Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. It was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the ClimateWorks Foundation. The intended audience for this report is the full range of stakeholders working in the Cerrado biome; the recommendations included here are not designed for any particular actor and in fact would necessarily need to be undertaken by many different actors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of the Cerrado's Water
    THE RELEVANCE OF THE CERRADO’S WATER RESOURCES TO THE BRAZILIAN DEVELOPMENT Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima1; Euzebio Medrado da Silva1; Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho1; Eder de Souza Martins1; Adriana Reatto1; Vinicius Bof Bufon1 1 Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, km 18, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil, 70670-305. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cerrado (Brazilian savanna) is the second largest Brazilian biome (204 million hectares) and due to its location in the Brazilian Central Plateau it plays an important role in terms of water production and distribution throughout the country. Eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this Biome. It contributes to more than 90% of the discharge of the São Francisco River, 50% of the Paraná River, and 70% of the Tocantins River. Therefore, the Cerrado is a strategic region for the national hydropower sector, being responsible for more than 50% of the Brazilian hydroelectricity production. Furthermore, it has an outstanding relevance in the national agricultural scenery. Despite of the relatively abundance of water in most of the region, water conflicts are beginning to arise in some areas. The objective of this paper is to discuss the economical and ecological relevance of the water resources of the Cerrado. Key-words: Brazilian savanna; water management; water conflicts. INTRODUCTION The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome in extension, with about 204 million hectares, occupying 24% of the national territory approximately. Its largest portion is located within the Brazilian Central Plateau which consists of higher altitude areas in the central part of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil
    The Cerrado-Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor in Brazil Pantanal Program Mônica Harris, Erika Guimarães, George Camargo, Cláudia Arcângelo, Elaine Pinto Cerrado Program Ricardo Machado, Mario Barroso, Cristiano Nogueira CI in Brazil • Active since 1988. • Two Hotspots: Atlantic Forest and Cerrado • Three Wilderness Areas: Amazon, Pantanal and Caatinga • Marine Program Cerrado overview • 2,000,000 km2 Savannah • approximately 4,400 of its 10,000 plant species occur nowhere else in the world • 75% loss of the original vegetation cover • Waters from the Cerrado drain into the lower Pantanal Pantanal overview • A 140,000 km2 central floodplain surrounded by a highland belt of Cerrado • Home for at least: – 3,500 species of plants –300fishes –652 birds –102 mammals – 177 reptiles – 40 amphibians • Largest wetland in the world, with extremely high densities of several large vertebrate species The Cerrado – Pantanal Biodiversity Corridor – The Beginning: • Priority Setting Workshop for the Cerrado and the Pantanal (1998) • Partnership:CI, Ministry for the Environment, Funatura, Biodiversitas and UnB. • Priority areas were identified for biodiversity conservation by 250 specialists TheThe ResultsResults:: Priority Areas for the Conservation of the Cerrado and Pantanal Corredores de Biodiversidade Cerrado / Pantanal CorridorsCorridors Chapada dos Guimarães betweenbetween # # thethe CerradoCerrado # Unidade de conservação Pantanal Matogrossense andand thethe Áreas prioritárias Taquaril Emas Rios # Corredores propostos PantanalPantanal Pantanal Rio
    [Show full text]
  • Soy and Cattle: Report 7
    Report 7 November 2019 1 Executive Summary This report presents 12 cases of land clearing based on alerts data from DETER (System for Monitoring Deforestation on Real Time) and PRODES (Program for Deforestation Calculation) observed between 27 August 2019 and 26 September 2019, in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado biomes. Land clearing alerts considered in this report were visually confirmed. Eight of the selected cases are in the Amazon biome, and four are in the Cerrado biome. Cleared land per municipality of all cases included in this report (in hectares) Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) Cumaru do Norte (Pará) São Félix do Xingu (Pará) Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) Damianópolis (Goiás) Terminology Barreiras (Bahia) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Amazon (18,232 ha) Cerrado (4,685 ha) Rapid Response Soy & Cattle – Report 7 – November 2019 2 Table of Contents Amazon Biome 1. Fazenda Rio Preto I e II – Canabrava do Norte (Mato Grosso) .................... 4 2. Fazenda Rio Dourado – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ........................................ 7 3. Fazenda Nossa Senhora da Medalha – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) ............... 10 4. Fazenda Cabocla – Cumaru do Norte (Pará) ................................................ 12 5. Fazenda Brusque do Xingu – São Félix do Xingu (Pará) …………………..….…… 15 6. Fazenda Macuco – Paranatinga (Mato Grosso) …………………………………..…… 18 7. Fazenda Nove de Julho – Brasnorte (Mato Grosso) ……………………………...… 20 8. Fazenda São José I – Peixoto de Azevedo (Mato Grosso) ………................…. 23 Cerrado Biome 9. Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 02 and Fazenda Santa Maria Gleba 03 – Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) ……………………………………………………………………… 25 10. Fazenda Grotão – Damianópolis (Goiás) ……………………………………….……….
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Brazil's Southeast Region: Limitations and Future Challenges to Development
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics de Castro, César Nunes Working Paper Agriculture in Brazil's Southeast region: Limitations and future challenges to development Texto para Discussão, No. 1952a Provided in Cooperation with: Institute of Applied Economic Research (ipea), Brasília Suggested Citation: de Castro, César Nunes (2014) : Agriculture in Brazil's Southeast region: Limitations and future challenges to development, Texto para Discussão, No. 1952a, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), Brasília This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/121530 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu capa_1952a.pdf 1 29/05/2014 10:05:02 Ipea’s mission Enhance public policies that are essential to Brazilian development by producing and disseminating knowledge and by advising the state in its strategic decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expansion of Irrigated Agriculture in Brazil and the Potential Regional Limitations1
    THE EXPANSION OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE IN BRAZIL AND THE POTENTIAL REGIONAL LIMITATIONS1 Angel dos Santos Fachinelli Ferrarini2 Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho3 Santiago Vianna Cuadra4 Daniel de Castro Victoria5 Summary Regional expansion of irrigated agriculture causes a growth in food production in the country, minimizes risks for the farmer and strengthens food security for future generations. However, at the same time, it has a damaging effect on water availability, via demands for water use, which may intensify situations of microregional water scarcity6. The TERM-BR model was used to simulate expansion scenarios in irrigated areas, aiming at verifying the impact in the water use for 2025. Scenarios were adapted from the National Water Resources Plan (PNRH) and simulations were carried out for areas deemed potentially suitable for irrigation based on the Ministry of National Integration report (MI). Irrigated agriculture was separated from dry farming in terms of differential productivity. The Climatic Water Balance (CWB) was estimated for Northeastern States in order to compare regional water supply and demand. Results for the Brazil regions suggest that the greater impact on the GDP, investment and use of regional families would take place in the state of Mato Grosso, in the Midwest region of the country. The comparative result of the CWB and the TERM- BR model for states in the Northeastern region point to potential water availability problems in the states of Alagoas and Pernambuco in particular. Introduction The irrigated agriculture area has been growing constantly for the last 20 years in Brazil. The Brazilian Agricultural Census has registered a total of 1,959,810 irrigated hectares in 1985 and 4,545,532 hectares in 2006, a growth of 132% during the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Plano De Ação Para Prevenção E Controle Do Desmatamento E Das Queimadas No Estado Do Maranhão
    Governo do Estado do Maranhão Casa Civil Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais Grupo Permanente de Trabalho Interinstitucional PLANO DE AÇÃO PARA PREVENÇÃO E CONTROLE DO DESMATAMENTO E DAS QUEIMADAS NO ESTADO DO MARANHÃO (Decreto nº 27.317, de 14 de abril de 2011) São Luis, Maranhão Novembro de 2011 ROSEANA SARNEY Governadora do Estado do Maranhão WASHINGTON LUIZ DE OLIVEIRA Vice-Governador LUIS FERNANDO MOURA DA SILVA Secretário-Chefe da Casa Civil CARLOS VICTOR GUTERRES MENDES Secretário de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais HILDO AUGUSTO DA ROCHA NETO Secretário de Estado de Assuntos Políticos CONCEIÇÃO DE MARIA CARVALHO DE ANDRADE Secretária de Estado do Desenvolvimento Agrário e Agricultura Familiar FRANCISCO ASSIS CASTRO GOMES Secretário de Estado do Desenvolvimento Social JURANDIR FERRO DO LAGO FILHO Secretário de Estado do Turismo CLÁUDIO DONISETE AZEVEDO Secretário de Estado da Agricultura, Pecuária e Pesca OLGA MARIA LENZA SIMÃO Secretária de Estado da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior JOÃO BERNARDO BRINGEL Secretário de Estado da Educação JOSÉ MAURÍCIO DE MACEDO SANTOS Secretário de Estado do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio CARLOS ALBERTO FRANCO DE ALMEIDA Secretário Extraordinário de Assuntos Estratégicos FÁBIO GONDIM PEREIRA DA COSTA Secretário de Estado do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão JOSÉ AUGUSTO SILVA OLIVEIRA Universidade Estadual do Maranhão 2 Grupo Permanente de Trabalho Interinstitucional Casa Civil Luis Francisco de Assis Léda Maria Odinéa Melo Santos Ribeiro Secretaria de
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 12 the Cerrados of Brazil.Pdf
    00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page i The Cerrados of Brazil 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page ii 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iii The Cerrados of Brazil Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna Editors Paulo S. Oliveira Robert J. Marquis Columbia University Press New York 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iv Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex © 2002 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The cerrados of Brazil : ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna / Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-231-12042-7 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0-231-12043-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Cerrado ecology—Brazil. I. Oliveira, Paulo S., 1957– II. Marquis, Robert J., 1953– QH117 .C52 2002 577.4'8'0981—dc21 2002022739 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page v Contents Preface vii 1 Introduction: Development of Research in the Cerrados 1 Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis I Historical Framework and the Abiotic Environment 2 Relation of Soils and Geomorphic Surfaces in the Brazilian Cerrado 13 Paulo E. F. Motta, Nilton Curi, and Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Brazil and Argentina: Developments and Prospects for Major Field Crops
    Chapter 2 A Comparison of Economic and Agricultural Settings Introduction Brazil and the United States have large domestic markets that consume most of their agricultural rgentina, Brazil, and the United States have output. For the United States, export markets are an Acompeted in international agricultural markets for important but residual destination for much of its decades. However, a very different set of demographic, cereal and oilseed (and products) output. In Brazil’s geographic, and economic circumstances underlies case, international markets compete more directly each country’s competitive position. This chapter with domestic markets as a source of demand. With a provides some perspective to the differences and simi- relatively small population, Argentina relies most larities that distinguish these three agricultural directly on international markets as an outlet for its competitors. In addition, it sets the stage for a later grain and oilseed production. discussion of agricultural development in Argentina and Brazil by comparing their population and Abundant Land Base Strikes a economic characteristics, land base, the climate Common Theme for each country’s principal areas of agricultural production, and finally, the transportation and The combined total land area of 1.1 billion hectares marketing infrastructure. for Argentina and Brazil is 22 percent larger than U.S. area. Yet they are almost identical to the United States Agriculture’s Economic Role in area devoted to agricultural activities—about 419 Differs Sharply million hectares in 1998 (table B-2). However, only 78 million hectares were involved in field crop production The U.S. economy is both huge (in terms of aggregate in these two countries in 1998, compared with 177 GDP) and wealthy (in terms of GDP per capita).
    [Show full text]
  • Production and Protection: a First Look at Key Challenges in Brazil
    Executive Summary PRODUCTION AND PROTECTION: A FIRST LOOK AT KEY CHALLENGES IN BRAZIL Climate Policy Initiative December 2013 Brazil has vast natural resources that carry immense area they covered in 1985. Today, Brazil has a relatively potential for the country's economic and environmental consolidated institutional framework and well-established goals. As in many other nations, there is frequent instruments for the protection of natural resources in tension between these goals, compounded by rising public lands. These have been extensively used in the pressures from increasing global demand for food, along Amazon. However, challenges remain in the protection with climate change risk. Using land eciently is crucial of native vegetation cleared in small increments, on to achieve both sets of goals. Yet, the promotion of private property, and with Brazil's ecosystems beyond ecient land use still stands as a great challenge. the Amazon, while sustainable forestry is underdeveloped. A Production and Protection (P&P) strategy is an integrated approach towards land use intended to help Ways forward to address these challenges include: address these challenges. This report applies a P&P framework to Brazil to understand where land can be • Improve existing monitoring techniques to used more eciently across important sectors within the adequately deal with small-scale Amazon country. deforestation. Once driven by large-scale forest clearings, Amazon deforestation currently results We nd that there is ample scope for enhanced primarily from the cutting down of forest in small protection of natural resources and growth of increments (see Figure 1). This is likely a symptom of agricultural production in Brazil within a P&P some of the technical shortcomings of Brazil's current framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine
    remote sensing Article Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine Carlos M. Souza Jr. 1,* , Julia Z. Shimbo 2, Marcos R. Rosa 3 , Leandro L. Parente 4 , Ane A. Alencar 2 , Bernardo F. T. Rudorff 5 , Heinrich Hasenack 6 , Marcelo Matsumoto 7 , Laerte G. Ferreira 4, Pedro W. M. Souza-Filho 8 , Sergio W. de Oliveira 9, Washington F. Rocha 10 , Antônio V. Fonseca 1 , Camila B. Marques 2, Cesar G. Diniz 11 , Diego Costa 10 , Dyeden Monteiro 12, Eduardo R. Rosa 13 , Eduardo Vélez-Martin 6 , Eliseu J. Weber 14 , Felipe E. B. Lenti 2 , Fernando F. Paternost 13, Frans G. C. Pareyn 15, João V. Siqueira 16, José L. Viera 15, Luiz C. Ferreira Neto 11, Marciano M. Saraiva 5 , Marcio H. Sales 17, Moises P. G. Salgado 5 , Rodrigo Vasconcelos 10, Soltan Galano 10, Vinicius V. Mesquita 4 and Tasso Azevedo 18 1 Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (Imazon), Belém 66055-200, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (Ipam), Brasília 70863-520, Brazil; [email protected] (J.Z.S.); [email protected] (A.A.A.); [email protected] (C.B.M.); [email protected] (F.E.B.L.) 3 Programa de Pós-Gradução em Geografia Física, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil; [email protected] 4 Image Processing and GIS Laboratory (LAPIG), Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiania 74001-970, Brazil; [email protected] (L.L.P.); [email protected] (L.G.F.); [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Program Cerrado Pantanal
    © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana FACTSHEET BR 2016 CERRADO Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © PANTANALPROGRAM © Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana THE WWF-BRAZIL WWF-Brazil is an environmental organization that works to conserve various Brazilian ecosystems, including two of South America’s most important regions: the Cerrado and the Pantanal. The Cerrado, Pantanal and Upper Paraguay River Basin are included in WWF’s 35 global priority places. This vast area is the focus of our conservation work undertaken through the Cerrado Pantanal Program. © Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil © CERRADO PANTANAL PRIORITY AREAS The Cerrado Ecoregion The Pantanal Ecoregion Upper Paraguay River Basin © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana CERRADO © Bento Viana / WWF-Brazil © Bento Viana Stretching across 11 states and the Federal District, the Cerrado is South America’s second largest phytogeographic domain. It can also be found in the states of Roraima, Amapá, Amazonas and Pará and partially covers Bolivia and Paraguay. The Cerrado covers roughly 25% of the country and is one of the biologically richest savannas on the planet. The Cerrado is connected to four of Brazil’s five biomes – the Amazon, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, and Pantanal. It is regarded as the “cradle” of Brazil’s water resources, since it feeds not only Brazil’s major aquifers, but also six of the country’s eight river basins and the Pantanal. Area Over 2 million sq km Conservation Less than 10% of the Cerrado is covered by protected areas Biodiversity The
    [Show full text]