DOCSLIB.ORG

FY12 Capital Improvement Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY12 Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Five Year Plan Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon FY2012-2016 Draft Five Year Plan Capital Improvement Program Table of Contents Page # INTRODUCTION Section I Introduction 1 TriMet Facilities Map 5 5 Year Plan Summary of Expenditure-Constant Dollars 6 REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS Section II Vehicles i Fixed Route Buses - Active Fleet R-01 Fixed Route Buses - Expansion & Reserve Fleet Requirement R-03 Fixed Route Buses - Contingency Fleet R-04 Fixed Route Buses - Capital Requirements R-05 Light Rail Vehicles R-12 ATP Vehicles - Active & Expansion Fleet R-13 ATP And Community Based Vehicles - Capital Requirements R-14 Customer Facilities & Amenities ii Bus Shelters R-15 Neighborhood Bus Shelters R-16 Downtown Transit Mall Shelters R-17 Bus Transit Centers And Park & Rides R-19 Light Rail Stations, Park & Rides, Transit Centers R-32 Customer Information & TTO R-36 Operations v Operations & Administration Facilities R-37 Light Rail Shop And Trolley Barn R-47 Light Rail Track And Structures R-51 Light Rail Electrification And Signaling System R-52 Shop Equipment Replacement/Repair >$5,000 R-53 Shop Equipment Replacement/Repair <=$5,000 R-58 Capital Light Rail Shop Equipment >$5,000 R-68 Operations Light Rail Shop Equipment <=$5,000 R-71 MOW Equipment Inventory And Replacement Plan R-74 Fare Revenue Capital Equipment Inventory And Investment Plan R-77 Capital Facilities Maintenance Equipment >$5,000 R-78 Table of Contents FY2012-2016 Draft Five Year Plan Capital Improvement Program Table of Contents Page # Capital Facilities Maintenance Equipment <=$5,000 R-85 Bus Maintenance Non-Revenue Vehicles >$5,000 R-92 Bus Maintenance Non-Revenue Vehicles <=$5,000 R-102 LIFT Shop Equipment >$5,000 R-111 LIFT Shop Equipment <=$5,000 R-112 Information Technology vii Information Technology - Communications, Computing, Security, Servers, Voice, Cable, Fare, Etc. R-113 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Section III Vehicles 4 40-Ft Hybrid Buses for Expansion I-01 Safety System Security Improvements I-02 Rail Safety Enhancements I-04 Positive Train Control I-05 Work Environment Improvements (Safety Program) I-06 Customer Amenities Concession Services Development I-07 Bus On-Street Related Maintenance I-08 Bus Stop Development I-09 Operating Projects Milwaukie Bus Stop Improvement Carryover I-12 Park & Ride Signage and Shared Use Support I-13 Lloyd District Transit Tracker Enhancements I-14 Rockwood/188th MAX Station Rehabilitation I-15 Bike Stations-Beaverton Transit Center I-16 Gresham Civic Station I-17 Orenco MAX Bike & Ride I-18 Transit Enhancement Projects I-19 Table of Contents FY2012-2016 Draft Five Year Plan Capital Improvement Program Table of Contents Page # Service Tigard Park & Ride Expansion: Land Acquisition I-20 Bike to Transit Facilities I-21 Willamette Shore Trolley Program I-22 BRT First Corridor I-23 Operations Rail Maintenance Equipment I-24 Operator Training Equipment I-25 Purchase Rail and Other Track Materials for RI59 Girder Rail Track I-26 Purchase and Install Track Switch Heaters and Covers I-27 Union Station Area Bus Layover and Turnaround I-28 On-Board Energy Storage Units I-31 Lake Oswego DEIS IGA I-32 Storm Water Underground Injection Control (UIC) Permit I-33 Type-1/2/3 LRV Communication Systems Upgrade for Orange Line I-36 WES Switch Heater Installation I-37 Conversion of MAX Track Switches to Powered Operation for Service Quality I-38 Type 4 LRV Spare Parts I-40 Facilities Rail Facilities Expansion - Elmo Remodel and Central MOW Base I-41 Pier Park Bus Layover/Operator Restroom Facility I-42 WES Maintenance Facility Air Compressor Upgrade I-44 Permanent Operator Restrooms at Priority End-of-Route Locations I-45 Merlo Garage Contamination Cleanup I-47 Ruby/Elmonica Mezzanine Fall Protection Retrofit I-49 All Facilities Maintenance I-50 Barbur Boulevard Stormwater Retrofit I-51 Table of Contents FY2012-2016 Draft Five Year Plan Capital Improvement Program Table of Contents Page # Information Technology (See Replacement Table 17) Sensitive Information Security Program R-129 Oracle HR Pension/Retiree Benefits Project R-129 Legal/HR Systems R-130 Transit Tracker Displays - Blue & Red MAX Lines R-131 Bus Automatic Stop Announcement System R-133 LIFT MDT, Dispatch & Communications System R-133 Multi-Modal Trip Planner R-133 FMIS/MMIS Project R-133 Operator Self-Serve Application R-133 CCTV - East and Westside Locations R-138 Table of Contents TriMet FY2012 - FY2016 Draft Capital Improvement Program Introduction TriMet’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes a Replacement and an Improvement Program. The Replacement Program includes the necessary replacement and rehabilitation of existing capital assets. The Improvement Program includes additions to the capital plant that further TriMet’s program priorities. TriMet’s draft Five Year Action Plan is as follows: Focusing On Our Customers Create a culture of safety Restore, expand and build more service Upgrade and improve access to transit with focused investments Modernize fare collection Increase employee presence on the system Living Within Our Means Enhance employee productivity Increase fare inspection Bring health care costs in line Building Partnerships for Transit Growth Engage our customers and constituents Encourage partnerships with local governments. The FY2012-FY2016 Draft Capital Improvement Plan includes many projects that further these principles. Projects that upgrade and improve access to transit with focused investments include: bus replacement, Eastside light rail station improvements, Transit Tracker, Bus Stop Development, Security and Public Address are included. TriMet is beginning to work on how to modernize fare collection within existing resources. As in the past, there is continued emphasis on cost-effectively extending the useful life of equipment, vehicles, facilities, and making capital replacement expenditures only when cost of maintenance warrants the expenditure. This had led to a substantial reduction in replacement costs. 1 It is important to note that funding has not been identified for all capital projects in the CIP, and most projects in the improvement section are discretionary. All costs shown in the Draft Capital Improvement Program are 2012 dollars. Capital Budgeting Policies and Approaches For planning purposes, TriMet uses a definition of “capital” that is close to the Federal Transit Administration’s definition of capital. Capital projects entail acquisition, construction, improvement, and maintenance of facilities and equipment for use in transit. Examples include: . Replacement of vehicles; . Expansion of vehicle fleets; . Crime prevention and security equipment; . Purchase and installation of service and support equipment; . Accessory and miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units, bus stop signs, supervisory vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and shop and garage equipment; . Construction of maintenance facilities, including land acquisition, design, engineering, demolition; . Rehabilitation of maintenance facilities, including design and engineering, land acquisition, and relocation; . Construction of other facilities, e.g., transfer facilities, intermodal terminals and bus shelters, including design and engineering, land acquisition, etc.; and . Capital support equipment, including computer hardware, software, bus diagnostic equipment, and other equipment that enhances operating efficiency. Rolling stock, including rail cars, locomotives, work trains, ferryboats; . Track; . Line equipment; . Line structures; . Passenger stations, depots and terminals, including ferry terminals; . Signals and communications; . Power equipment and substations; . Projects to improve safety and security; . Operational support, including computer hardware and software; . Systems extensions or new system construction, including engineering, demolition, etc.; and 2 . Land acquisition, design, and construction for fixed guideways. For budgeting and accounting purposes, however, TriMet has revised its definition of capital. Many items that were once defined as capital are now considered operating projects. These include projects such as roof replacement, rail grinding, and ice caps. As a rule, projects that cannot be tagged for fixed asset inventory are operating projects. Projects that previously fell under the definition of capital should continue to be maintained in and considered for funding via the Draft Capital Improvement Plan. If funded they will be show up in the operating budget as one-time-only expenditures, instead of being included in the capital budget. 1. Priorities: TriMet views its capital projects as either (a) additions to the capital plant or as (b) rehabilitation and replacement of the existing capital plant. Capital budgeting priorities are: . First Priority: Mandatory Replacement Mandatory Safety Regulatory Requirements Second Priority: Improvement Program While replacement projects may occasionally be deferred for one or two years, they are not elective. Adequate maintenance and replacement is necessary to maintain safe, reliable and attractive service for our customers and minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. It attracts new customers and helps keep current customers. 2. Planning and Budgeting Replacement Projects TriMet plans and budgets Replacement projects as follows: . Each department maintains an inventory and condition assessment of capital items. The purpose of the inventory is to estimate the life expectancy, condition and replacement costs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple
    APPENDIX A Key FRA Regulations (Affecting Joint Use) The following is a listing of key FRA specifications. This listing is intended as a regulations taken from the Code of Federal general identification of the operative code Regulations (49 CFR 200-299), Federal sections, along with a general description Railroad Administration, that may affect of the requirements. This identification joint operation of light rail transit or diesel code section should not imply or impute multiple unit vehicles with railroads. The that the code provision will need to be selected regulations concern operational modified to operate light rail transit or procedures, standards, and certain design DMU with railroads. Regulation Number and Section Comment §209: Railroad Safety Enforcement Policy procedures for assessing Procedures penalties and for appealing penalties. Also includes, fitness-for-duty and follow-up on FRA recommendations. §210: Railroad Noise Emission Covers total sound emitted by moving Compliance Regulations rail cars and locomotives. Does not apply to: • Steam engines; • Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation; • Sound emitted by warning devices such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety; • Special-purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars. §211: Rules of Practice Subpart C - Rules of practice that apply to Waivers rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued §211.41: Processing of petitions for under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous waiver of safety rules safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. Page A-1 Regulation Number and Section Comment §212: State Safety Participation Establishes standards and procedures for Regulations State participation in investigative and surveillance activities under Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan
    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan CONVENIENCE SAFETY RELIABILITY EFFICIENCY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FRIENDLY SERVICE EQUITY & ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements The City of Wilsonville would like to acknowledge the following for their dedication to the development of this Transit Master Plan. Their insight and outlook toward the future of this City helped create a comprehensive plan that represents the needs of employers, residents and visitors of Wilsonville. Transit Master Plan Task Force Planning Commission Julie Fitzgerald, Chair* Jerry Greenfield, Chair Kristin Akervall Eric Postma, Vice Chair Caroline Berry Al Levit Paul Diller Phyllis Millan Lynnda Hale Peter Hurley Barb Leisy Simon Springall Peter Rapley Kamran Mesbah Pat Rehberg Jean Tsokos City Staff Stephanie Yager Dwight Brashear, Transit Director Eric Loomis, Operations Manager City Council Scott Simonton, Fleet Manager Tim Knapp, Mayor Gregg Johansen, Transit Field Supervisor Scott Star, President Patrick Edwards, Transit Field Supervisor Kristin Akervall Nicole Hendrix, Transit Management Analyst Charlotte Lehan Michelle Marston, Transit Program Coordinator Susie Stevens Brad Dillingham, Transit Planning Intern Julie Fitzgerald* Chris Neamtzu, Planning Director Charlie Tso, Assistant Planner Consultants Susan Cole, Finance Director Jarrett Walker Keith Katko, Finance Operations Manager Michelle Poyourow Tami Bergeron, Planning Administration Assistant Christian L Watchie Amanda Guile-Hinman, Assistant City Attorney Ellen Teninty Stephan Lashbrook,
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project: Health Impact Assessment
    Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project: Health Impact Assessment Program Partner Metro Funders US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Network of Public Health Institutes Oregon Public Health Institute www.orphi.org Prepared by: Steve White, Sara Schooley, and Noelle Dobson, Oregon Public Health Institute For more information about this report contact: Steve White, [email protected] Acknowledgements: This project relied on the time and expertise of numerous groups and individuals. Metro staff members Kathryn Sofich, Jamie Snook, Brian Monberg, and Cliff Higgins served on the Project Team and provided documentation, data, and input for all phases of the HIA. They also helped create and sustain interest within Metro for participating in this project. Other Metro staff members also provided valuable comments and critiques at the five brown bags held at Metro to talk about this project and HIA more generally. Substantial input was also provided by the project’s Advisory Committee which provided input on scoping and assessment methodology, and reviewed drafts at various stages. AC members included: Julie Early-Alberts, State of Oregon Public Health Division Gerik Kransky, Bicycle Transportation Alliance Scott France, Clackamas County Community Health John MacArthur, Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium Mel Rader, Upstream Public Health Maya Bhat, MPH, Multnomah County Health Department Brendon Haggerty, Clark County Public Health Joe Recker, TriMet Amy Rose, Metro Daniel Kaempff, Metro Special thanks are also due to Aaron Wernham, project director for Pew Charitable Trust’s Health Impact Project, for providing valuable insight and advice at the project’s outset regarding the coordination of HIA and Environmental Impact Statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit a Section 143: Urban Center Zones
    EXHIBIT A SECTION 143: URBAN CENTER ZONES CONTENTS SECTION 143: URBAN CENTER ZONES ........................................................................... 1 I. Purpose and Applicability ........................................................................................................ 1 A. Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Applicability ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. Land Use Zones ........................................................................................................................ 2 A. Urban Center – Residential Medium Density (UC‐RM) ............................................................. 2 B. Urban Center – Mixed Use Urban Density (UC‐MU) ................................................................. 2 C. Urban Center – Activity Center (UC‐AC) .................................................................................... 3 D. Urban Center – Neighborhood Center (UC‐NC) ........................................................................ 3 E. Urban Center – Office/Research (UC‐OR) ................................................................................. 3 F. Urban Center – Research Park (UC‐RP) ..................................................................................... 3 III. Housing Types ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbatim Comments
    2011 CALTRAIN RIDER SURVEY On-Board Survey VERBATIM COMMENTS Prepared by COREY, CANAPARY & GALANIS RESEARCH 447 Sutter Street – Penthouse North San Francisco, CA 94108 2011 CALTRAIN ONBOARD RIDER SURVEY . VERBATIM COMMENTS CONTENTS VERBATIM COMMENTS BY CATEGORY Coding of respondent comments was done to provide a department specific or subject specific listing of comments. These department/subject specific categories are listed below. 1. Schedules/Frequency .................................................................... 4 – 11 2. Routes/Stops .................................................................................... 12 3. On-time Performance/Reliability................................................... 13 – 19 4. Delay Information/Service Announcements/Updates .................... 20 – 29 5. Transit Connections/Transfers ...................................................... 30 – 31 6. Crowding/Seat Availability.................................................................... 32 7. Fares/Fare Policy/Ticket Validation Procedure .............................. 33 – 39 8. Personnel ..................................................................................... 40 – 46 9. Enforcement/Security................................................................... 47 – 50 10. Safety Issues ........................................................................................ 51 11. Bikes/Bike Cars ............................................................................ 52 – 54 12. Train Cleanliness-Exterior/Interior................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Southern California's Future on Track
    Keeping Southern California’s 25Future on Track CONTENTS Message from the Board Chair .........................1 CEO’s Message .....................................................3 A Quarter Century of Moving People: The Metrolink Story .............................................5 How It All Began ................................................19 Metrolink’s Top Priority: Safety .......................27 WHO WE ARE Environment ........................................................31 Metrolink is Southern California’s regional commuter rail service in its Metrolink Relieves Driving Stress ...................35 25th year of operation. Metrolink is governed by The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Board Members Past and Present ..................40 a joint powers authority made up of an 11-member board representing Metrolink Pioneering Staff the transportation commissions of Still on Board ......................................................47 Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties. Metrolink Employees Metrolink operates seven routes Put Customers First ...........................................48 through a six-county, 538-route-mile network with 60 stations. Facts at a Glance ...............................................50 For more information, including how to ride, go to www.metrolinktrains.com MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to provide safe, efficient, dependable and on-time transportation service that offers outstanding customer experience and enhances quality of life. For
    [Show full text]
  • MAG Regional Commuter Rail System Study Update Final Report
    2018 REGIONAL COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM STUDY UPDATE Maricopa Association of Governments | May 2018 APPENDICES MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM STUDY UPDATE Appendix A: Methodology for Cost Estimating May 2018 Page intentionally left blank. Table of contents 1.0 METHODOLOGY FOR COST ESTIMATING __________________________________ 1 1.1 Purpose __________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 General __________________________________________________________ 1 1.3 Cost Estimate Format _______________________________________________ 1 1.4 Capital Cost Estimates ______________________________________________ 2 1.5 O&M Cost Estimates ________________________________________________ 2 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND BASIS OF ESTIMATE _________________________________ 3 2.1 General __________________________________________________________ 3 i Page intentionally left blank. ii 1.0 METHODOLOGY FOR COST ESTIMATING 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to present the methodology that will be used to estimate the capital and the annual operating and maintenance (O&M) costs for the MAG System Study Update commuter rail corridors. The cost estimates will follow the methodology discussed below to the maximum extent practical given that no conceptual engineering has been completed to date. Where no detail for cost estimating is available, unit costs on a major level such as route track mile, complete station, or other lump sum will be utilized. 1.2 General The cost estimates for the MAG System Study Update are based upon: Conceptual level design or less. Recent costs experienced or estimated for the commuter rail and freight railroad industries. Costs experienced on recent commuter rail projects. Unit costs obtained from major vendors, as appropriate. Federal funding sources and will follow Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration procedures. In addition, the following will be included with the cost estimates: A comprehensive list of assumptions and all supporting documents supporting line item costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Area: Southeast
    PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources.
    [Show full text]