Invasion of Malaya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Invasion of Malaya CHAPTER 8 INVASION OF MALAYA Y dawn on 8th December, seventeen sorties had been carried out by B Hudsons of No . 1 Squadron R.A.A.F. against Japanese ships and troops engaged in the landing at Kota Bharu . Continuous heavy rains had created conditions in which the Kota Bharu airfield would normally hav e been regarded as unserviceable, and a thick blanket of cloud hung lo w over the sea . However, ground staff and crews sprang to their tasks, an d low-level attacks were made on enemy vessels, amid intense anti-aircraf t fire from the Japanese . It appeared, when results were reviewed, that one transport had been blown up, one containing tanks and artillery had been set ablaze, and one had disappeared after receiving direct hits .' Of the squadron's ten serviceable Hudsons, two, with their crews, had been lost . The captain of one of the latter was Flight Lieutenant Ramshaw,2 who had first located the Japanese convoys . Most of the other Hudsons were damaged, but were made again serviceable after daylight. They, and other aircraft mustered for early daylight operations, then attacked landing craf t and Japanese troops ashore. Air Force headquarters planned an all-out effort against Japanese trans - ports at Kota Bharu at dawn on the 8th, but when the squadrons arrived over the area the ships had withdrawn. At 7.30 a.m. Japanese bombers and fighters began delivering heavy attacks on Malaya's northern airfields , using light bombs against planes and personnel, and avoiding seriou s damage to airfield surfaces . They were notably successful in arriving ove r the airfields while defending craft were descending or taking off . The performance of the enemy aircraft, and the accuracy of the bombing , came "as an unpleasant surprise "3 to Malaya Command, despite Intelli- gence reports of the performance of the Zero fighters which had bee n sent to the Far Eastern Air Command headquarters.4 It appeared that the fighters had been given increased range by auxiliary fuel tanks, torpedo - shaped and made of aluminium, which could be jettisoned when their contents had been used . Eight attacks were made in ten hours on Kot a Bharu airfield, which was frequently strafed by low-flying aircraft . On the beaches where the Japanese had landed, the ground force s received little air support, and it soon became apparent that the Japanes e had complete mastery of the air in the vicinity . Although the Dogras stuck gamely to their task, a gap made by the enemy remained open . The Awagisan Maru was sunk, and Ayato Maru and Sakewa Maru were damaged . 2 F-Lt J . C . Ramshaw; No. 1 Sqn RAAF. Draftsman ; of Malvern, Vic ; b . Bangalore, India, 1 8 Oct 1914. Killed in action 8 Dec 1941 . A. E . Percival, Despatch on Operations of Malaya Command, from 8th December 1941 to 15th February 1942 . ' It transpired that the information had lain unnoticed among the accumulation of Intelligenc e material at the headquarters . Its establishment did not include an Intelligence staff at the time the report was received, and the Combined Intelligence Bureau was inadequate for the needs of the three Services. 138 INVASION OF MALAYA 8 Dec 1941 Brigadier Key,5 commanding the 8th Indian Brigade, decided that if th e airfield were to be held this gap must be closed before dusk; but the 1/13th Frontier Force Rifles and the 2/ 12th Frontier Force Regiment , ordered forward for the purpose, were delayed by numerous rivers an d creeks, and by the nature of the country generally . In the confused situatio n which resulted, Key received during the afternoon a report that the airfiel d was already being attacked from the ground. This report was a repeat of one already dispatched to Air Head- quarters at Singapore during the temporary absence from his headquarter s of the station commander, Wing Commander Noble.6 On his return, Noble was dismayed to find the station headquarters ablaze and the staff pre - paring to leave, as Singapore had acted on the report and ordered a with- drawal. Having ordered his staff to remain, Noble joined Key in a recon- naissance of the airfield and discovered from the Indians that the Japanes e were not yet about the perimeter defences . In the meantime the Australians of No . 1 Squadron were working o n their Hudsons under periodic air attack. During the afternoon, they detected what they thought to be aimed small-arms fire in their vicinity ; a supposition which their commanding officer verified . Faced with the headquarters order to withdraw, Noble began an orderly retreat after Ke y had agreed to it. When the last of the few serviceable Hudsons had flow n off at dusk, the Australian ground staff joined the station headquarters staff and left by truck for Krai, where they were to entrain for Singapore . In view of this occurrence, the reappearance of Japanese transport s off the beach soon after dark, and the prospect of his forward troop s becoming isolated and overwhelmed, Key, with higher approval, ordere d withdrawal during the night to a position north of Kota Bharu township — a course which he found had been decided upon also by Malaya Com- mand. By midnight, the troops and guns on the airfield had been evacuated , and it was in enemy hands . The purpose for which troops had bee n stationed in Kelantan had thus disappeared in twenty-four hours . The fact that the main Japanese landings were at Singora and Patan i had been revealed in the course of dawn air reconnaissance on 8th December ; and later in the morning many Japanese planes, mostly fighters , were found to be using the Singora airfield. The Japanese had forestalle d Operation MATADOR, for which the troops of the 11th Indian Divisio n had been standing by at half an hour's notice in drenching rain since th e afternoon of 6th December. As the division was disposed, with three battalions beside trains, two in camp with their trucks loaded, and on e forward near the frontier, they were ill prepared for any other move. There they remained, despite what was happening, and endeavours t o obtain authority from Malaya Command for action, until about 1 .30 p.m. Then, when vital hours had been lost, orders which had been issued at Maj-Gen B . W. Key, DSO, MC. Comd 8 Ind Bde 1940-42 ; GOC 11 Ind Div 1942. Regular soldier; b. 19 Dec 1895 . • Gp Capt C. H. Noble, OBE . Station Comd Kota Bharu 1941, Lahat 1942, Ender 1942-43 ; Assist Comdt RAF Base Batavia 1942 . Of Melbourne; b. Bristol, Gloucester, England, 18 Apr 1905 . Khlaung Ngae 23]0. bra Setup) P9`Bessr Z~ \ \`lam II ""' . iPEERLIS ;'TM I^^'. Kangar K dia g it A u n .Nerang' if' `\\~ \~an at Jitra j K Japan's opening moves in Malaya 140 INVASION OF MALAYA 8Dec 11 .30 a.m. reached III Indian Corps headquarters requiring it to adopt the alternative plan and occupy selected defensive positions on th e Singora and Kroh-Patani roads, and to dispatch a mobile column toward s Singora, in an endeavour to obstruct the Japanese advance . The 28th Indian Brigade was allotted to the 11th Division as a reserve force, an d entrained at Ipoh at 5 p .m. That such a restricted manoeuvre was all that remained of the dynamic plan to move into Thailand was naturall y dispiriting to the troops and their commanders . Even this might be fore- stalled by the enemy; and the men would be tired and confused before they could give battle . The main defensive line now to be held, running from east of Jitr a to the west coast, was in the State of Kedah, astride the main road an d railway from Malaya into Thailand. Its right flank rested on jungle-clad hills which had been considered by the planners of Malay a's defence system to be militarily impenetrable . Selected for the protection of the airfiel d at Alor Star and others south of it, the line was the only so-called pre - pared position of such extent on the Malayan mainland. Its system of communication trenches and line signal communications was, however , incomplete ; it had not been wired, and anti-tank mines had not been laid. In fulfilment of orders, a force known as "Krohcol" (Lieut-Colonel Moorhead') based on Kroh, and comprising in the first instance 3/16th Punjab, was sent to seize a position known as "The Ledge ", thirty miles beyond the frontier. Another force, "Laycol" (Brigadier Lays ) comprising two companies and the carrier platoon of 1/8th Punjab, with anti-tan k guns and engineers, advanced along the Changlun road towards Ba n Sadao, eight miles beyond the frontier on the way to Singora . An armoure d train, manned by a platoon of the 2/ 16th Punjab and some engineers , entered Thailand from Padang Besar, in Perlis, northernmost state o f Malaya. The vanguard of Krohcol crossed the frontier in mid-afternoon, an d was immediately fired upon by Thai armed constabulary. As a result, it had cleared only three miles of the road past the frontier when it halted for the night . Laycol reached Ban Sadao at dusk, and took up a position north of the village . There, about 9 p.m., a Japanese column o f thirty-five vehicles, preceded by tanks, and with headlights blazing, bor e down on it. Two of the tanks were knocked out by gun and rifle fire , but the Japanese infantry, who had dismounted at the beginning of th e action, were soon engaged in an enveloping movement .
Recommended publications
  • Australians Into Battle : the Ambush at Gema S
    CHAPTER 1 1 AUSTRALIANS INTO BATTLE : THE AMBUSH AT GEMA S ENERAL Percival had decided before the debacle at Slim River G that the most he could hope to do pending the arrival of further reinforcements at Singapore was to hold Johore. This would involve giving up three rich and well-developed areas—the State of Selangor (includin g Kuala Lumpur, capital of the Federated Malay States), the State of Negr i Sembilan, and the colony of Malacca—but he thought that Kuala Lumpu r could be held until at least the middle of January . He intended that the III Indian Corps should withdraw slowly to a line in Johore stretching from Batu Anam, north-west of Segamat, on the trunk road and railway , to Muar on the west coast, south of Malacca . It should then be respon- sible for the defence of western Johore, leaving the Australians in thei r role as defenders of eastern Johore. General Bennett, however, believing that he might soon be called upo n for assistance on the western front, had instituted on 19th December a series of reconnaissances along the line from Gemas to Muar . By 1st January a plan had formed in his mind to obtain the release of his 22nd Brigade from the Mersing-Jemaluang area and to use it to hold the enem y near Gemas while counter-attacks were made by his 27th Brigade on the Japanese flank and rear in the vicinity of Tampin, on the main road near the border of Malacca and Negri Sembilan . Although he realised tha t further coastal landings were possible, he thought of these in terms of small parties, and considered that the enemy would prefer to press forwar d as he was doing by the trunk road rather than attempt a major movement by coastal roads, despite the fact that the coastal route Malacca-Muar- Batu Pahat offered a short cut to Ayer Hitam, far to his rear .
    [Show full text]
  • Malaya Command 1939]
    7 December 2019 [MALAYA COMMAND 1939] Malaya Command The Malaya Infantry Brigade (1) Headquarters, The Malaya Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Bn. The Loyal Regiment (North Lancashire) 1st Bn. The Manchester Regiment (2) 2nd Bn. The Gordon Highlanders 12th Indian Infantry Brigade (3) Headquarters, 12th Indian Infantry Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Bn. The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (Princess Louise’s) 5th Bn. 2nd Punjab Regiment 4th Bn. 19th Hyderabad Regiment 22nd Mountain Regiment, Indian Artillery 15th Field Company, Queen Victoria’s Own Madras Sappers and Miners The Malaya Anti-Aircraft Brigade Headquarters, The Malaya Anti-Aircraft Brigade & Signal Section 1st Anti-Aircraft Regiment, Hong Kong and Singapore Royal Artillery (4) (H.Q., 6th, 9th and 10th Anti-Aircraft Batteries, H.K.S.R.A.) 2nd Anti-Aircraft Regiment, Hong Kong and Singapore Royal Artillery (5) (H.Q., 11th, 12th and 13th Anti-Aircraft Batteries, H.K.S.R.A.) 3rd Anti-Aircraft Regiment, Royal Artillery (6) (H.Q., 11th, 29th and 30th Anti-Aircraft Batteries, Royal Artillery) ©www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 7 December 2019 [MALAYA COMMAND 1939] Singapore Fortress Headquarters, Singapore Fortress & Signal Section The Singapore Armoured Car Company 1st (Singapore Volunteer Corps) Bn. The Straits Settlement Volunteer Force 2nd (Singapore Volunteer Corps) Bn. The Straits Settlement Volunteer Force 7th Heavy Regiment, Royal Artillery (7) (H.Q., 11th, and 31st Heavy Batteries, Royal Artillery, and 5th and 7th Heavy Batteries, H.K.S.R.A.) 9th Heavy Regiment,
    [Show full text]
  • Malaya Command (1930-42) History & Personnel
    2019 www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Author: Robert PALMER A CONCISE HISTORY OF: MALAYA COMMAND (HISTORY & PERSONNEL) A concise history of Malaya Command between 1930 and 1942, including details of the senior officers who held appointments in the Command during this period. Copyright ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk (2019) [MALAYA COMMAND (1930-42) HISTORY & 7 December 2019 PERSONNEL] A Concise History of Malaya Command (1930-42) (History & Personnel) Version: 1_1 This edition dated: 7 December 2019 ISBN: Not allocated. All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means including; electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, scanning without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Author: Robert PALMER, M.A. (copyright held by author) Assisted by: Stephen HEAL Published privately by: The Author – Publishing as: www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk © www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 [MALAYA COMMAND (1930-42) HISTORY & 7 December 2019 PERSONNEL] Malaya Command Malaya is a country in south-east Asia, although it was not a homogeneous state between the two world wars. It comprised four Straits Settlements, namely: • Singapore; • Malacca; • Dinding; • Penang. These were territories of the United Kingdom, being established as such on 1 April 1867. There were also four Federated Malay States established by the British government in 1895: • Selangor; • Perak; • Negeri Sembilan; • Pahang. The U.K. government was responsible for foreign affairs and defence of these four states. There were five unfederated states, namely: • Perlis; • Kedah; • Kelantan; • Terengganu; • Jahore. These unfederated states were nominally independent but part of the British protectorate of Malaya.
    [Show full text]
  • The Companion Guide V1 D3
    Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 The Organisation of the 1st Battalion Cambridgeshires .................................................................... 6 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6 2. The standard infantry battalion in 1942 ............................................................................... 6 3. The Elements of the Battalion .............................................................................................. 8 4. Attached Units .................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Royal Army Medical Corps Personnel. ....................................................................... 13 5. Brigade Structure ................................................................................................................ 13 6. Neighbouring Battalions ..................................................................................................... 13 6.1 4th and 5th Suffolks...................................................................................................... 13 6.2 5th Loyals .................................................................................................................... 14 6.3 1/5th Sherwood Foresters (Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Regiment) ................. 15 6.4
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of FRIDAY, the 2Oth of FEBRUARY, 1948 Published By
    flumi), 38216 1347 THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of FRIDAY, the 2oth of FEBRUARY, 1948 published by Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 26 FEBRUARY, 1948 REPORT ON THE AIR OPERATIONS DURING THE CAMPAIGNS IN MALAYA AND NETHERLAND EAST INDIES FROM STH ' DECEMBER, 1941 TO I2TH .MARCH, 1942. The following report was submitted to the they were in office, but in general the survey Secretary of State for Air on July 26th, 1947, deals with the period between ist June, 1941, by Air Vice-Marshal Sir PAUL MALTBY, and the outbreak of war. It indicates the K.B.E., C.B., D.S.O., A.F.C., Assistant Air energetic measures which were taken immedi Officer Commanding Far East Command, ately beforehand to prepare the Command foi Royal ,Air Force, from January izth to war, and points a picture of the situation as it ' February loth, 1942, and Air.*0fficer Com- existed at the outbreak of hostilities. mandtng Royal Air Force in Java from The narrative contains only brief reference to February nth to March izth, 1942. developments in Hong Kong, Burcma and the Indian Ocean, operational control of which *. - . FOREWORD. passed out of the hands of the A.O.C. Far East A report on the operations in Malaya and the Command soon after the Japanese had landed ISLE.I. would be incomplete without a survey in Malaya. Their presence in the Command of the situation in the Far East before war during the pre-war penod did, however,, broke out ,there. A convenient date for begin- appreciably divert attention, and work from ning such a survey is ist June, 1941, soon after pressing matters of local application, and to the date, 24th April, 1941, on which the late this degree affected preparation for war in Air Vice-Marshal C.
    [Show full text]
  • Malayan Campaign 1941-42 Lessons for ONE SAF
    POINTER MONOGRAPH NO. 6 Malayan Campaign 1941-42 Lessons for ONE SAF Brian P. Farrell ■ Lim Choo Hoon ■ Gurbachan Singh ■ Wong Chee Wai EDITORIAL BOARD Advisor BG Jimmy Tan Chairman COL Chan Wing Kai Members COL Tan Swee Bock COL Harris Chan COL Yong Wui Chiang LTC Irvin Lim LTC Manmohan Singh LTC Tay Chee Bin MR Wong Chee Wai MR Kuldip Singh A/P Aaron Chia MR Tem Th iam Hoe SWO Francis Ng Assistant Editor MR Sim Li Kwang Published by POINTER: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces SAFTI MI 500 Upper Jurong Road Singapore 638364 website: www.mindef.gov.sg/safti/pointer First published in 2008 Copyright © 2008 by the Government of the Republic of Singapore. All right reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Ministry of Defence. Body text set in 12.5/14.5 point Garamond Book Produced by touche design CONTENTS About the Authors iv Foreword viii Chapter 1 1 Th e British Defence of Singapore in the Second World War: Implications for the SAF Associate Professor Brian P. Farrell Chapter 2 13 Operational Art in the Malayan Campaign LTC(NS) Gurbachan Singh Chapter 3 30 Joint Operations in the Malayan Campaign Dr Lim Choo Hoon Chapter 4 45 Command & Control in the Malayan Campaign: Implications for the SAF Mr Wong Chee Wai Appendices 62 ABOUT THE AUTHORS ASSOC PROF BRIAN P. FARRELL is the Deputy Head of the Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © and Moral Rights for This Thesis Are Retained by the Author And/Or Other Copyright Owners. a Copy Can Be Downloa
    McCrum, Ronald. (2014) The role and consequences of the part played by the civilian authorities in the fall of Singapore, February 1942. PhD thesis. SOAS University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/20319/ Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. THE ROLE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE PART PLAYED BY THE CIVILIAN AUTHORITIES IN THE FALL OF SINGAPORE, FEBRUARY 1942. Ronald McCrum Thesis submitted for the degree MPhil in History 2014 Department of History SOAS, University of London 1 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 3 ABBREVIATIONS 4 INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER ONE. BACKGROUND. 18 CHAPTER TWO. A COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION. 44 CHAPTER THREE. THE IMPRECISE BATTLE PLAN. 70 CHAPTER FOUR. CIVIL DEFENCE IN DISARRAY. 95 CHAPTER FIVE. RESPONDING TO THE CAMPAIGN. 117 CHAPTER SIX. THE CIVIL AUTHORITIES DURING THE SEIGE OF SINGAPORE. 150 CHAPTER SEVEN. THE CONSEQUENCES. 176 CHAPTER EIGHT. CONCLUSION. 192 ANNEX A. MAP OF SINGAPORE. ANNEX. B. MAP OF MALAYA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 4 NAKED ISLAN D HE Situation Facing General Wavell, As He Saw It
    CHAPTER 1 4 NAKED ISLAN D HE situation facing General Wavell, as he saw it at the beginning o f T February, was that Ambon Island had fallen to the enemy on 31st January; there was still a convoy at Balikpapan which might at any time move south on Macassar or Bandjermasin ; and a third force, reported to be in the South China Sea, might be heading for Singapore or Sumatra. Rangoon was endangered by the enemy advance in Burma, and the Britis h forces had been driven from the mainland of Malaya. In Wavell's view much depended on the ability of the forces on Singapore Island to make a prolonged resistance . He considered that an active defence should enable the island to be held for some time—perhaps for some months—while th e forces at his command were being strengthened. Mr Churchill's thoughts had turned, while he was concluding his talks in Washington, to the possibility of a withdrawal to Singapore Island such as had now occurred. "How many troops would be needed to defend this area?" he had asked in a message to General Wavell on 15th January. "What means are there of stopping landings [such] as were made in Hong Kong? What are defences and obstructions on landward side? Are yo u sure you can dominate with fortress cannon any attempt to plant sieg e batteries? Is everything being prepared, and what has been done about the useless mouths? "1 These questions, which but for his preoccupation with more immediat e issues he might well have asked much earlier, brought a disconcertin g reply.
    [Show full text]
  • Wwii-Text.Pdf
    a heritage trail CONTENTS. » northwest » city 01 Sarimbun Beach Landing _________p.3 27 Sook Ching Screening Centre 02 Lim Chu Kang Landing Site ________p.3 (Hong Lim Complex) _____________p.23 03 Ama Keng Village _______________p.4 28 Fort Canning Command Centre ___p.24 04 Tengah Airfield _________________p.4 29 The Cathay _____________________p.25 05 Jurong-Kranji Defence Line _______p.5 30 Kempeitai Headquarters 06 Kranji Beach Battle ______________p.6 (YMCA) _______________________p.26 07 Causeway ______________________p.7 31 Raffles Library & Museum 08 Kranji War Cemetery ____________p.8 (National Museum of Singapore) __p.27 32 Former St. Joseph’s Institution (Singapore Art Museum) _________p.28 » northeast 33 Padang _________________________p.29 09 The Singapore Naval Base ________p.9 34 Municipal Building (City Hall) _____p.29 10 Sembawang Airfield _____________p.11 35 St. Andrew’s Cathedral __________p.29 11 Seletar Airfield__________________p.11 36 Lim Bo Seng Memorial ___________p.30 12 Punggol Beach Massacre Site _____p.12 37 Cenotaph ______________________p.30 13 Japanese Cemetery Park _________p.12 38 Indian National Army Monument _p.30 39 Civilian War Memorial ___________p.31 40 Singapore Volunteer Corps » central Headquarters (Beach Road Camp) p.32 14 Battle for Bukit Timah ____________p.13 41 Kallang Airfield _________________p.32 15 Ford Factory (Memories at Old Ford Factory) ___p.14 16 Bukit Batok Memorial ____________p.15 » east 17 Force 136 & 42. The Changi Museum _____________p.35 Grave of Lim Bo Seng _____________p.16 43. Changi Prison ___________________p.35 44. Johore Battery __________________p.36 45. India Barracks __________________p.37 » south 46. Selarang Barracks _______________p.37 18 Pasir Panjang Pillbox _____________p.17 47. Robert Barracks _________________p.37 19 Kent Ridge Park _________________p.17 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaya Would Require at The
    Chapter Four­ Preparing for War The Australian army had plenty of experience in transforming recruits into soldiers at home. It had experienced training and fighting both in the Middle East and Western Europe. However, it had no experience at all of what in 1940 was known as the Far East. In Australia, the training of the three battalions of the 22nd Brigade had been along what were then conventional lines, suited to the wide spaces of the desert or the fields of Western Europe. It had been anticipated that the posting to Malaya would require at the very least some alteration to the training regime. With time, it in fact precipitated a raft of changes in many facets of army life. In Malaya the AIF faced two challenges from the outset. The soldiers needed to acclimatise to the different conditions that pertained in a new and unfamiliar environment-the climate, the terrain, the local foodstuffs and even their drinking water which had always to be boiled. They also had to deal with what were often inappropriate, inadequate or insufficient clothing, equipment, weapons and ammunition. The soldiers of the 211 8th Battalion had no more say in the suitability or quality of their equipment than they had had in the location of their posting. While they could expect to be paid, fed, clothed, equipped, trained and eventually taken to the war, they were justified in concluding that "the AIF in Malaya was ... low on the priority list as far as food, clothes and equipment was concerned.") They had no option but to put up with the chronic shortages that affected the various aspects of their daily life and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface 1 Introduction
    Notes Preface 1. Basil Liddell Hart, The British Way in Warfare (New York: Macmillan, 1933), Chapter 1, ‘The Historical Strategy of Britain’. Liddell Hart’s treatise was writ- ten in reaction to Britain’s costly participation on the Western Front during the Great War; for Michael Howard’s interpretation, see ‘The British Way in Warfare: A Reappraisal’, in The Causes of Wars, and Other Essays (Boston: Unwin Paperbacks, 1985), p. 200. 1 Introduction 1. Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987); Philip Darby, British Defence Policy East of Suez 1947 to 1968 (London: OUP for RIIA, 1973); Nicholas Tarling, The Fall of Imperial Britain in South-East Asia (London: OUP, 1993); Correlli Barnett, The Lost Victory: British Dreams, British Realities 1945–1950 (London: Macmillan Press–now Palgrave, 1995). 2. Barnett condensed this argument for his 1995 presentation to the RUSI. See ‘The British Illusion of World Power, 1945–1950,’ The RUSI Journal, 140:5 (1995) 57–64. 3. Michael Blackwell has studied this phenomenon using a socio-psychological methodology. See Michael Blackwell, Clinging to Grandeur: British Attitudes and Foreign Policy in the Aftermath of the Second World War, (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1993). 4. Tarling, p. 170. 5. Darby, p. 327. 6. See John Garnett, ‘Defence Policy-Making,’ in John Baylis et al. (eds), Contemporary Strategy, Vol. II: The Nuclear Powers, 2nd edn (London: Croom Helm, 1987) pp. 1–27. 7. Richard Rosecrance, Defense of the Realm: British Strategy in the Nuclear Epoch (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968), Appendix Table 1, Defense Expenditures, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legendary Overseas Chinese Anti-Japanese Army in the Defence of Singapore During the Japanese Invasion of February 1942
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Arts - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2009 The legendary overseas Chinese anti-Japanese Army in the defence of Singapore during the Japanese invasion of February 1942 Jung Kwok University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kwok, Jung, The legendary overseas Chinese anti-Japanese Army in the defence of Singapore during the Japanese invasion of February 1942 2009, 63-72. https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers/875 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] When the Soldiers Return: November 2007 Conference Proceedings, pp. 63-72. The Legendary Overseas Chinese Anti-Japanese Army in the Defence of Singapore during the Japanese Invasion of February 1942 JOHN KWOK University of Wollongong Known as the Overseas Anti-Japanese Army by the Chinese in Singapore but officially as Dalforce by the British, this was a Chinese militia unit formed to defend Singapore Island during the Japanese invasion in 1942. Its unit history written by its deputy commander Major Hu Tie Jun suggests that the Overseas Anti-Japanese Army was a heroic and patriotic army. The legendary exploits of the Overseas Chinese Anti-Japanese Army has since been picked up by Singaporean journalist writer Foong Choon Hon and made into a popular wartime narrative in Singapore in his best seller war narrative The Price of Peace.
    [Show full text]