Machiavellian Heroes Through the Prism of Aristotle Robert Acosta University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2009-01-01 Machiavellian Heroes Through the Prism of Aristotle Robert Acosta University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Acosta, Robert, "Machiavellian Heroes Through the Prism of Aristotle" (2009). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 193. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/193 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MACHIAVELLIAN HEROES THROUGH THE PRISM OF ARISTOTLE ROBERT ACOSTA Department of Political Science APPROVED: ___________________________________ Robert Webking, Ph.D., Chair ____________________________________ Charles Boehmer, Ph.D. ____________________________________ William Springer, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Patricia D. Witherspoon, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Dedicated to my models of excellent men: Joaquin Acosta Jr. Joaquin Acosta Sr. and Raul Rivas Sr. And for my muse, Vanessa Desiree Garcia, 0.4. -Robert Acosta MACHIAVELLIAN HEROES THROUGH THE PRISM OF ARISTOTLE By ROBERT ACOSTA, B.A., POLITICAL SCIENCE THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Political Science THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my all-star thesis committee of Robert Webking, Charles Boehmer, and William Springer. Dr. Springer, for providing an indispensable moral compass; Dr. Boehmer for helping me navigate the labyrinths of the graduate school bureaucracy; and Dr. Webking for being a mentor and friend, Ethics 1156b8-33. I would like to thank my editors-in-chief: my mother, Evangelina Acosta and my brother, Adrian Acosta. Not only did they read and edit, they both inspired me to return to my studies. In this I have found peace. I would like to thank my sister, Veronica Carmona, and my nephews and godsons, Adrian Noe Carmona and Andres Esteban Carmona. They provided the much needed distractions that allowed me to finish this thesis happy and whole. I would like to thank my grandmother, Angelina G. Rivas, for showing me the strength of perseverance through faith. Lastly, I would like to thank my godfathers, Armando Acosta and Raul Rivas Jr. Thank you for all your support, it has meant more than you could know. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..v Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 2. PART ONE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 3. PART TWO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..35 Theseus…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….36 Romulus……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………51 Cyrus…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………68 Moses………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..94 4. PART THREE………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………114 LIST OF REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………143 CURRICULUM VITA…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………149 v “Forgive us our virtues-thus one should pray to men.” -Friedrich Nietzsche INTRODUCTION: “Don’t worry if I say anything that seems to you different from what we want, because all will turn out to the purpose”-Ligurio in Machiavelli’s Mandragola1 This thesis is concerned with a traditional problem of political philosophy. The problem is primarily concerned with the thought and enterprise of Niccolo Machiavelli. Machiavelli’s political thought is believed to represent a radical break with the philosophy of the ancients. Machiavelli’s uniqueness lies in his apparent re-conception of human nature, human fulfillment, and the subsequent idea of human virtue. Machiavelli regards his venture as both dangerous and excellent, as it represents the foundation of new modes and orders for the common benefit of mankind.2 Machiavelli’s thought has had practical consequences and is therefore worthy of analysis. The central problem that this thesis is concerned with then, is the problem that is presented by the character of Machiavelli’s philosophy; in essence Machiavelli’s virtue. The problem confronted by this thesis is neither unique nor original. The originality of this thesis lies not in the problem, but in the nature of the solution to the problem that is presented in the person of Machiavelli. The novelty of this work lies in its analysis of Machiavelli through the prism of Aristotle. The hypothesis of this paper is that there is a direct correlation between the political philosophies of Aristotle and Machiavelli. Machiavelli incorporates three fundamental theses of Aristotelian political philosophy: 1. Machiavelli agrees with Aristotle’s thesis that politics is the master science. 2. Machiavelli agrees with 1 Machiavelli, Niccolo. Mera J. Flaumenhaft, translator. Mandragola. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press 1981. Page 29. 2 See Preface to the Discourses on Livy. 1 Aristotle’s thesis that man is a political animal. 3. Machiavelli’s ideal prince reflects Aristotle’s conception of human nature. This thesis contends that Machiavelli’s radical re-conception of human nature is actually a re-packaging of Aristotle’s fundamental political philosophy. The validity of these hypotheses will be tested by an examination of the case studies that Machiavelli advocates studying in Chapter VI of The Prince. The extent of Aristotle’s influence can be measured by the extent that the case studies reflect these general Aristotelian premises. If the case studies reflect Aristotle then our hypotheses would be validated. If Machiavelli incorporates elements of Aristotle’s thought, it is presumed that Machiavelli’s heroes: Theseus, Romulus, Cyrus, and Moses would reflect Aristotle by way of Machiavelli. The notion of a direct connection between Aristotle and the thought of Machiavelli is significant because many interpretations of Machiavelli focus singularly on his claim of innovation and ignore the relationship between his ideas and those of Aristotle. The void in this area of Machiavelli scholarship is indicated by this passage, “But, and this is more noteworthy, there is no trace of Platonic or Aristotelian teleology, no reference to any ideal order, to any doctrine of man’s place in nature in the great chain of being.”3 This thesis will attempt to exhibit a direct link between Aristotelian teleology, Aristotelian conceptions of human nature, and the thought of Machiavelli. As students of Machiavelli, we must remain wary and remember that it is dangerous to take Machiavelli at face value. It would not be surprising if Machiavelli was to heed the advice that he offers in Chapter XVIII of The Prince,”-And the one who has known best how to use the fox has come out 3 Berlin, Isaiah. The Originality of Machiavelli, in Against the Current. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. P. 37. 2 best. But it is necessary to know well how to color this nature, and to be a great pretender and dissembler; and men are so simple and so obedient to present necessities that he who deceives will always find someone who will let himself be deceived.”4 Despite this, it is assumed by most analysts that Machiavelli is simply stating the truth when he declares he is departing “from the orders of others.”5 In addressing the Machiavellian mission, Leo Strauss puts it bluntly, “Accordingly he rewrites, as it were, Aristotle’s Ethics.”6 Machiavelli’s thought becomes an eradication of the political philosophy of Aristotle. Machiavelli advises his readers in Chapter XXI of The Prince, that “A prince is also esteemed when he is a true friend and a true enemy, that is, when without any hesitation he discloses himself in support of someone against another…And it will always happen that the one who is not friendly will seek your neutrality, and he who is friendly to you will ask that you declare yourself with arms.”7 Let us heed Machiavelli’s advice and issue a blunt call to arms, and announce that the purpose of this thesis is to correct the “old-fashioned and simple opinion” that Machiavellian thought cannot be understood by virtue of an Aristotelian prism. The Significance of the Problem: A Review of the Literature: The significance of the problem of Machiavelli is manifest by the consequence of his thought. It is by virtue of the famous, or perhaps infamous, Machiavellian maxims that we have become familiar with the adjective: Machiavellian. Leo Strauss begins his analysis on 4 Machiavelli, Niccolo. Harvey C. Mansfield, translator. The Prince. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, p. 70. 5 Ibid, p. 61. 6 Strauss, Leo. Niccolo Machiavelli in Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983. P. 214. 7 Machiavelli, Niccolo. Harvey C. Mansfield, translator. The Prince. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, p. 89-90. 3 Machiavelli by stressing the climate of the conventional opinions regarding Machiavelli. “We shall not shock anyone, we shall merely expose ourselves to good-natured or at any rate harmless ridicule, if we profess ourselves inclined to the old-fashioned and simple opinion according to which Machiavelli