Maritime Treasures Off Peninsular Malaysia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maritime Treasures Off Peninsular Malaysia MARITIME TREASURES OFF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA OOI Keat Gin Asia-Pacific Research Unit (APRU-USM), School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia [email protected] ABSTRACT UAD = Underwater Archaeology Division The Malay Peninsula – or what is present day UCH = Underwater Cultural Heritage West/Peninsular Malaysia – shores are flanked on either UKM = Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia side by the South China Sea on the east and the Straits of UMS = Universiti Malaysia Sabah Malacca (Melaka) on the west, both essentially important UNESCO = United Nations Educational, Scientific and sea-borne passages between the East and the West. By the Cultural Organization first millennium BCE and the early part of the first mil- lennium CE the Malay Peninsula possessed trading sites INTRODUCTION on the lower reaches of rivers and along the coasts. Com- The Straits of Malacca was a pivotal passage of the Mari- plementing the peninsula’s strategic location was the sea- time Silk Route. The Malay Peninsula then acted as a sonal monsoonal pattern that facilitated the comings and ‘connector’ for the confluence and interaction of traders goings of merchant fleets enabling long-distant seaborne deriving from East Asia with counterparts from South and trade to develop. The peninsula acted as a ‘connector’ for West Asia and within Southeast Asia. A multitude of nat- the confluence of traders from East Asia to interact with ural elements and man-made disasters (warfare in particu- counterparts from South and West Asia and within South- lar) resulted in shipwrecks in the Straits and the South east Asia. The Straits of Malacca was a pivotal passage of China Sea. This paper shall revisit the beginnings of mari- the Maritime Silk Route. A multitude of natural elements time archaeology in that part of the Malay Peninsula, and man-made disasters (warfare in particular) resulted namely Peninsular Malaysia, ascertain the players and the in shipwrecks in the Straits and the South China Sea. This contemporary playing field, the benefits of this endeav- paper shall revisit the beginnings of maritime archaeolo- our, look towards its developments, and envisage its fu- gy in that part of the Malay Peninsula, namely Peninsular ture directions. Malaysia, ascertain the players and the contemporary playing field, the benefits of this endeavour, look towards HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: STRATEGICALLY its developments, and envisage its future directions. ON THE MARITIME SILK ROUTE Although the Sanskrit name of Suvarnabhumi (‘Land of ABBREVIATIONS Gold’) was generally attributed to Sumatra during the first ICSID = International Centre for Settlement of Invest- century CE, it could also have referred to neighbouring ment Disputes Malay Peninsula across the Straits of Malacca (Wheatley JMA = Jabatan Muzium dan Antikuiti (Museum and An- 1961; 1980: 285). During this early period there were tiquities Department) visits from the Indian sub-continent to the vicinity of the JWN = Jabatan Warisan Negara (National Heritage De- Straits. The auriferous area of central Pahang yielded partment), gold, the much sought after precious metal by the Indians. KPKM = Kementerian Peloncongan dan Kebudayaan It undoubtedly owed to this metal that the ancient Greek Malaysia (Malaysian Ministry of Tourism and Culture) term ‘Golden Khersonese’ was likely attributed to the TLDM = Tentera Laut DiRaja Malaysia (Royal Navy of Malay Peninsula. The Indians also recorded the term Su- Malaysia) varnadvipa meaning ‘Golden Peninsula (or Island)’, again Sdn Bhd = Sendirian Berhad (Private Limited) another probable reference to the Malay Peninsula. By the MARE = Marine Archaeology Research Excavation third century CE the Chinese were aware that the Malay MHS = Malaysian Historical Salvage Sdn Bhd Peninsula was an important intermediate point on the sea NARA = National Aquatic Resources Research and De- route to India. During the first millennium CE the Malay velopment Agency Peninsula was on the international trade route between NHA = National Heritage Act 2005 (2006) China and India. The Straits of Malacca was the pivotal PSD = Public Services Department sea passage in this East-West maritime international trade SEAMEO SPAFASoutheast Asian Ministers of Education particularly, from the fifth century CE owing to the de- Organization Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine cline and subsequent abandonment of the trans-peninsular Arts JOURNAL OF INDO-PACIFIC ARCHAEOLOGY 36 (2015): 5-15 OOI: MARITIME TREASURES OFF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA Figure 1: Malaysia Peninsula place names for terrestrial (red) and underwater (blue) archaeology sites mentioned in the text: Kedah, 1. Sungai Batu in Lembah Bujang, 2. Kuala Selinsing, 3. Langkasuka, 4. Chi-tu, 5. Khao Sam Kaeo (off map to the North), 6. Phu Kao Thong; 1. Sungai Langat, 2. Kuala Pontian, 4. Kuala Merbok, 5. Pulau Ketam, 6. Sungai Melaka, 7. Pantai Chendering, Japanese wreck, 8. Mersing, Johor – Risdam, 9. Cape Rachado – Vereenignk, 10. Tanjung Bidara – Diana, 11. Beting Bambek, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan – Nassau. overland trade route that was beset with formidable natu- Beginning from the second century CE there was an ral obstacles (Miksic 1999: 74-5). apparent steady decline in the use of the overland Silk Trade between the Indian sub-continent and Southeast Road trading network due to unsettling conditions in Cen- Asia was active during the first century CE. Not only tral and West Asia. Gradually there was a shift to the were Indian goods, mainly luxurious items such as beads Maritime Silk Route where the Straits of Malacca con- made from carnelian, agate and glass and intaglios made nected the South China Sea to the Bay of Bengal and the from Roman design, brought to Southeast Asia, but also Indian Ocean. The Malay Peninsula then was strategically point to trading relations between the Roman world and positioned on this maritime trade traffic. On the peninsu- Southeast Asia (Southworth 2004a: 643; Glover 1989). At la’s west coast emerged the port-polity of Kedah (Rahman the same time intra trade between territories within and Yatim 1990). Kedah’s location (Figure 1) on the Southeast Asia itself was evident from a notable example northeast shores of the Straits offered an unenviable posi- of the wide distribution of the Dongson bronze drums tion in commanding the sea traffic entering from the west throughout the region pointing to trading links (Calo and leaving from the east. At Sungai Batu in Lembah Bu- 2009, 2014). jang there were evidences pointing to iron smelting indi- 6 JOURNAL OF INDO-PACIFIC ARCHAEOLOGY 36 (2015) cating some form of long term settlement (Mokhtar Nai- 1980: 12; Hall 1985: 30). Within insular Southeast Asia zatul 2009; Mokhtar Naizatul, Mokhtar Saidin and Jeffrey native crafts crisscrossed the Malay Archipelago involved Abdullah undated). Further south along the western coast in local and regional commerce as well as feeding interna- of the peninsula was Kuala Selinsing, Perak that occupied tional trade with spices, jungle products, sea produce, and an important point on the north-central path of the Straits. other exotic goods. ‘The emergence of Melaka as a trad- The Peninsula’s east coast boasted two important points, ing hub in the 15th and 16th centuries,’ declared Muzium viz. Langkasuka (present-day Patani, Southern Thailand) Negara (National Museum) Director-General Datuk Ibra- and Chi-tu (‘Inland Kingdom’) in Kelantan’s interior. him Ismail in a news conference held in conjunction with Langkasuka’s prominence owed it to its commanding the exhibition ‘The Miracle of Shipwreck Treasures,’ at position between the Gulf of Thailand and the South Chi- the museum in Kuala Lumpur in September 2011, ‘at- na Sea, and proximity to the southern tip of the Indochi- tracted merchants from around the world’ (Bernama nese peninsula (present-day southern Vietnam) (Wheatley 2011). 1961; 1980: 253-4, 26; Southworth 2004b: 2, 764-5). The indigenous maritime empires that oversaw trade Recent research on the Isthmus of Kra, Thailand in the and commerce (local, regional, and international) in last decade had pointed to the existence of polities such as Southeast Asia, namely Srivijaya (seventh to thirteen cen- Khao Sam Kaeo and Phu Kao Thong that were at least of turies CE) and Melaka (1400-1511 CE) maintained and the mid-first century CE (Bellina et al 2012; Bellina et al sustained the Straits of Malacca as the major East-West 2014; Glover and Bellina 2011; Hung et al 2013). Such sea route. By the advent of the Portuguese and Spanish in discoveries lead to the likely and probable possibility of the sixteenth century the seaborne East-West trading route pushing further back the beginnings of intra-regional was well established; both Iberian powers appeared as trade and even long-distance trade to the mid-first century new players in an old (East-West) trading game. From the CE. seventeenth century when the Protestant powers – Dutch There are clear evidences that Indian socio-cultural and English – entered the scene, they reorganized the and economic exchanges were made with the Malay Pen- rules of the old trading system; they not only controlled insula in the late centuries BCE and early centuries CE, the sea passages in the all-important Straits of Malacca Kedah particularly was a significant example. Thereafter but also in one form or another exerted power and influ- between the fifth and tenth centuries CE Chinese officials ence over territories throughout insular Southeast Asia. In and religious pilgrims on seaward journeys en route to an agreement
Recommended publications
  • 461114 1 En Bookbackmatter 209..247
    Conclusion: Convergent Paths In November 1945, the President of the Republic of Vietnam, Hồ Chí Minh, sent a letter addressed to ‘the President of the Republic of Indonesia’, proposing that a joint declaration of solidarity to be made by Indonesia and Vietnam in the form of a ‘Preparatory Commission Struggling for a Federation of the Free Peoples of Southern Asia’. The letter, entrusted to an American journalist named Harold Isaacs, did not reach President Soekarno.1 It was handed to Vice-President Mohammad Hatta, who then passed it on to Prime Minister Sutan Sjahrir. Sjahrir discussed the offer with Soedjatmoko Koko, the interpreter to foreign correspon- dents of the Republican government, but told him that he would not reply and preferred just to ignore the letter. Sjahrir indifference sprang from his conviction that the situation in Indonesia and Vietnam were very different. The Indonesian nationalists were up against the Dutch, who were ‘a weak colonial power and could be defeated quickly.’ Hồ Chí Minh had to contend with the French, who could and would resist him for a long time. Furthermore, he looked askance at the fact that the DRV government depended on support from the communists, which was not the case in Indonesia. In conclusion, Sjahrir argued, ‘If we ally ourselves with Hồ Chí Minh, we shall weaken ourselves and delay Independence.’2 The story of the missed opportunity for cooperation between Vietnam and Indonesia3 as a result of Sjahrir’s ‘betrayal of the greater Asian revolution’,as 1Harold Robert Isaacs is the author of No Peace for Asia, which has been cited widely in this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia, September 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Malaysia, September 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: MALAYSIA September 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Malaysia. Short Form: Malaysia. Term for Citizen(s): Malaysian(s). Capital: Since 1999 Putrajaya (25 kilometers south of Kuala Lumpur) Click to Enlarge Image has been the administrative capital and seat of government. Parliament still meets in Kuala Lumpur, but most ministries are located in Putrajaya. Major Cities: Kuala Lumpur is the only city with a population greater than 1 million persons (1,305,792 according to the most recent census in 2000). Other major cities include Johor Bahru (642,944), Ipoh (536,832), and Klang (626,699). Independence: Peninsular Malaysia attained independence as the Federation of Malaya on August 31, 1957. Later, two states on the island of Borneo—Sabah and Sarawak—joined the federation to form Malaysia on September 16, 1963. Public Holidays: Many public holidays are observed only in particular states, and the dates of Hindu and Islamic holidays vary because they are based on lunar calendars. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date); Chinese New Year (movable set of three days in January and February); Muharram (Islamic New Year, movable date); Mouloud (Prophet Muhammad’s Birthday, movable date); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (movable date in May); Official Birthday of His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (June 5); National Day (August 31); Deepavali (Diwali, movable set of five days in October and November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date); and Christmas Day (December 25). Flag: Fourteen alternating red and white horizontal stripes of equal width, representing equal membership in the Federation of Malaysia, which is composed of 13 states and the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Change and Continuity in the Minangkabau Matrilineal System
    CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN THE MINANGKABAU MATRILINEAL SYSTEM Tsuyoshi Kato It is said fhat in Minangkabau society in ancient times, property was given to one's children instead of to one's kemanakan (one's sororal nieces and nephews).1 One day, Datuk Katumanggungan and Datuk Perpatih nan Sebatang, the two founders of the Minangkabau a d a t, wished to go to Aceh. After they sailed out from the port of Tiku/Pariaman on the west coast, the sea suddenly ebbed, for that was the divine decree of God. As a consequence, their ship ran aground on the sand. The two datuk gathered all their children and kemanakan together and said, "Hai, children and kemanakan, let us tow this ship, because it has run aground on the sand." Their children answered, "We are afraid that we will be run over by the ship." Their kemanakan replied, "If that is the wish of our elders, let us tow the ship. It does not matter even if we are run over by the ship and killed in the process, for it is the ship of our elders that has run aground." All the kema­ nakan then got off onto the sand and pulled the ship. With the assis­ tance of the spirits, the ship floated again of itself and moved to the middle of the sea. Later, following the advice of Cati Bilang Pandai, their able servant, the two datuk decreed that from that time on all the property was to be given, not to the children, but to the kemanakan as a reward of their services.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews Skeleton: Some Thoughts on the Relocation of Cultural Heritage Disputes” (Gerstenblith)
    159 Reviews Skeleton: Some Thoughts on the Relocation of Cultural Heritage Disputes” (Gerstenblith). Douglas Owsley and Richard Jantz interpret the Kennewick case as “a clash Edited by Charles R. Ewen between two systems of conceptualizing and tracing human history” (p. 141), although they assert that the origin of the lawsuit lies more with a lack of compliance with existing laws than with the ideological battle. In their chapter they Claiming the Stones/Naming the Bones: describe in great detail the myriad of research questions that Cultural Property and the Negotiation of the Kennewick skeleton raises and could potentially answer National and Ethnic Identity with further scientifi c study. ELAZAR BARKAN AND RONALD BUSH Patty Gerstenblith’s article, on the other hand, frames (EDITORS) the Kennewick case (and NAGPRA as a whole) in terms of social justice—returning to marginalized groups some Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, control over their own pasts (and thus their cultural identi- CA, 2003. 384 pp., 33 illus., index. $50.00 ties). She argues from a particularistic stance, outlining the paper. long history that has served to disconnect Native American groups from their cultural patrimony through a privileging Claiming the Stones/Naming the Bones is a timely volume of scientifi c evidence while simultaneously, through displace- that attempts to crosscut multiple disciplines (including ment and policies of cultural eradication, making it diffi cult archaeology, physical anthropology, literature, cultural stud- obtain such evidence. ies, ethnomusicology, and museum studies) and offer per- Neither Owsley and Jantz nor Gerstenblith overtly draw spectives regarding disputes over the defi nition and owner- attention to global vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • India – Thailand Relations: and Cultural Links in Soft Power Policy
    วารสารบัณฑิตศาสน มมร. India – Thailand Relations: And Cultural Links in Soft Power Policy Phrmaha Wutthipong Rodbamrung Research Scholar Jawaharlal Nehru University India Abstract I. Introduction The article will explore the religious Thailand is part of Suvarnabhumi and cultural ties between India and Thailand territory, which finds mention even in since the ancient time. The relations in terms Ramayana by written Valmiki in c.1000 BC. of religious and cultural ties had promoted Buddhism was embraced in Thailand, while relations that contributed to the concept of the kingdom of Thailand was small state in soft power which is the popular concept in the year seven hundred in Sukkhothai international politics. It will also examine the period. Prior to that, Thailand had long ‘Look East Policy’ and ‘Look West Policy’, history in which as per the legend, Thailand and how the two Policies ‘remarriage’ in was the kingdom of Daravati, which was order to promote ‘people to people’ and the city of Mons and Thais who lived in the tourism destination under the broad domain basin site of Chao Phra ya river. U-thong of the two mechanisms: The Bay of Bengal was the ancient city, which is situated in Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Suphanburi province. Phra Pathom Cedi Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) and was the big stupa which was discovered Mekong Ganga Cooperation (MCG) work to and made in third century B.C.1 (272-232 promote the role of religion and culture in B.C.). India-Thai Relations in the modern period. Accordingly, Venerable Sona and Keywords: Suvarnabhumi; Dvaravati; Venerable Uttara had been sent by King Buddhism; Brahmanism; Religious links; Asoka to Suvarnabhumi, (the land of gold) cultural links; Look East Policy, Look which was believed that gold was available in West Policy, BIMSTEC, Mekong Ganga Southeast Asia, such as Burma, Thailand, Cooperation (MCG).
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology (AN) 1
    Anthropology (AN) 1 AN-262 Primate Behavior, Evolution and Ecology Credits: 3 ANTHROPOLOGY (AN) Term Offered: Spring Term Course Type(s): None AN-103 Cultural Anthropology Credits: 3 The study of primatology, which examines the lifeways, biology, and Term Offered: All Terms behavior of our closest living relatives. Various topics will be explored Course Type(s): SS.SV including taxonomy and classification, diet, behavior, grouping patterns, Introduction to comparative study of human beliefs and behavior. locomotion, and land usage patterns of monkeys, apes and prosimians. Emphasis on the concepts used in studying human culture; analysis These topics will be explored within the frameworks of natural selection, of non-Western societies with respect to ecology, economy, social and sexual selection, and evolution. Also listed as BY-262. political organization, religion, and art; implications for American society. AN-263 Peoples and Cultures of South America Credits: 3 AN-104 Introduction to Biological Anthropology Credits: 3 Prerequisite(s): AN-103 or AN-113 Term Offered: All Terms Course Type(s): RE Course Type(s): HE.EL, HEPE, SS.SV A social and cultural survey of representative peoples in South America Introduction to physical anthropology; racial variation and the and the Caribbean, emphasizing the comparative study of economic, evolutionary origins of the human species; concepts and principles used political, social, and religious organization. in the study of living and fossil evidence for human evolution and genetic AN-264 North American Indians Credits: 3 diversity; unique influence of culture on human biology; human evolution Term Offered: All Terms in the present and future. Course Type(s): GU, RE AN-107 Introduction to Archaeology Credits: 3 A survey of the cultural, social and linguistic diversity of Pre-Columbian Term Offered: All Terms North American societies; problems of contemporary Indian groups.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call to Action: the Past and Future of Historical Archaeology
    A Call to Action: The Past and Future of Historical Archaeology FINAL PROGRAM 49th Annual Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology January 6-9, 2016 • Washington, D.C. OMNI SHOREHAM HOTEL FLOOR PLAN LOWER LEVEL 2 B Terrace Health Veranda Empire Club To Room Parkview Rooms Robert’s ADA Elevator Private Blue Room Blue Robert’s Restaurant Dining Palladian Diplomat to Blue Room Prefunction Room Room Room Room & Parkview Building Empire Foyer Sales Conference Room Parking Lot Rest Bird Cage Walk Rooms Women’s Lounge ADA Lift to (Lower Level) Ambassador and Little Something Men’s Clothing Executive Regency Ball Rooms Capitol East Registration Gormet ADA Elevator Store Room Telephones ATM to Roberts Restaurant Committee Level 1B Room Director’s Room East and Palladian Room WEST LOBBY West Room Elevators EAST LOBBY Elevators Coat Check Stairs Embassy Room AMBASSADOR Telephones Women’s News Stand Men’s Business West BALLROOM Gift Shop MAIN LOBBY Jewelry Restroom Center Registration Lounge Store Men’s Women’s Men’s Lounge Concerge Telephones Restroom Restroom President’s Desk (Lower Level) Hampton Room Board Room Front Desk Council Regency Gallery Room Senate Room Chairman’s & Reception Board Room Room Forum Room East Congressional West Conference Calvert Conference Governors Marquee Lounge Center Room Cabinet Center Board Room Room REGENCY BALLROOM EAST LOBBY MAIN ENTRANCE Calvert Room For Access to Diplomat ballrooms Capitol Room BALLROOMS (East Lobby) ADA Ramp Chairman’s Boardroom To Lobby Please use elevators on the West Side Embassy Room Blue Room and go to level 1B. Governor’s Boardroom Blue Pre-Function Hampton Room Hampton For Access to the Empire Ballroom President’s Boardroom and Health Club/Outdoor Pool East Registration Please use elevators on the West Side BALLROOMS (West Lobby) of the Hotel and go to level 2B.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and Development / Peter G. Gould
    Theme01: Archaeology and Development / Peter G. Gould Poster T01-91P / Mohammed El Khalili / Managing Change in an ever-Changing Archeological Landscape: Safeguard the Natural and Cultural Landscape of Jarash T01-92P / Wai Man Raymond Lee / Archaeology and Development: a Case Study under the Context of Hong Kong T01A / RY103 / SS5,SS6 T01A01 / Emmanuel Ndiema / Engaging Communities in Cultural Heritage Conservation: Perspectives from Kakapel, Western Kenya T01A02 / Paul Edward Montgomery / Branding Barbarians: The Development of Renewable Archaeotourism Destinations to Re-Present Marginalized Cultures of the Past T01A03 / Selvakumar Veerasamy / Historical Sites and Monuments and Community Development: Practical Issues and ground realities T01A04 / Yoshitaka SASAKI / Sustainable Utilization Approach to Cultural Heritage and the Benefits for Tourists and Local Communities: The Case of Akita Fortification, Akita prefecture, Japan. T01A05 / Angela Kabiru / Sustainable Development and Tourism: Issues and Challenges in Lamu old Town T01A06 / Chulani Rambukwella / ENDANGERED ARCHAEOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CITY OF KANDY AND ITS SUBURBS IN SRI LANKA T01A07 / chandima bogahawatta / Sigiriya: World’s Oldest Living Heritage and Multi Tourist Attraction T01A08 / Shahnaj Husne Jahan Leena / Sustainable Development through Archaeological Heritage Management and Eco-Tourism at Bhitargarh in Bangladesh T01A09 / OLALEKAN AKINADE / IGBO UKWU ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE AS A BOOST TO NIGERIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE OLALEKAN AJAO AKINADE, [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Orang Asli and Melayu Relations
    1 Orang Asli and Melayu Relations: A Cross-Border Perspective (paper presented to the Second International Symposium of Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, Padang, July 18-21, 2001) By Leonard Y. Andaya In present-day Malaysia the dominant ethnicity is the Melayu (Malay), followed numerically by the Chinese and the Indians. A very small percentage comprises a group of separate ethnicities that have been clustered together by a Malaysian government statute of 1960 under the generalized name of Orang Asli (the Original People). Among the “Orang Asli” themselves, however, they apply names usually associated with their specific area or by the generalized name meaning “human being”. In the literature the Orang Asli are divided into three groups: The Semang or Negrito, the Senoi, and the Orang Asli Melayu.1 Among the “Orang Asli”, however, the major distinction is between themselves and the outside world, and they would very likely second the sentiments of the Orang Asli and Orang Laut (Sea People) in Johor who regard themselves as “leaves of the same tree”.2 Today the Semang live in the coastal foothills and inland river valleys of Perak, interior Pahang, and Ulu (upriver) Kelantan, and rarely occupy lands above 1000 meters in elevation. But in the early twentieth century, Schebesta commented that the areas regarded as Negrito country included lands from Chaiya and Ulu Patani (Singora and Patthalung) to Kedah and to mid-Perak and northern Pahang.3 Most now live on the fringes rather than in the deep jungle itself, and maintain links with Malay farmers and Chinese shopkeepers. In the past they appear to have also frequented the coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia, September 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Malaysia, September 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: MALAYSIA September 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Malaysia. Short Form: Malaysia. Term for Citizen(s): Malaysian(s). Capital: Since 1999 Putrajaya (25 kilometers south of Kuala Lumpur) Click to Enlarge Image has been the administrative capital and seat of government. Parliament still meets in Kuala Lumpur, but most ministries are located in Putrajaya. Major Cities: Kuala Lumpur is the only city with a population greater than 1 million persons (1,305,792 according to the most recent census in 2000). Other major cities include Johor Bahru (642,944), Ipoh (536,832), and Klang (626,699). Independence: Peninsular Malaysia attained independence as the Federation of Malaya on August 31, 1957. Later, two states on the island of Borneo—Sabah and Sarawak—joined the federation to form Malaysia on September 16, 1963. Public Holidays: Many public holidays are observed only in particular states, and the dates of Hindu and Islamic holidays vary because they are based on lunar calendars. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date); Chinese New Year (movable set of three days in January and February); Muharram (Islamic New Year, movable date); Mouloud (Prophet Muhammad’s Birthday, movable date); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (movable date in May); Official Birthday of His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (June 5); National Day (August 31); Deepavali (Diwali, movable set of five days in October and November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date); and Christmas Day (December 25). Flag: Fourteen alternating red and white horizontal stripes of equal width, representing equal membership in the Federation of Malaysia, which is composed of 13 states and the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The development of modern education in Negara Brunei Darussalam with special reference to provision for the disabled Saman, Haji Abdullah Bin Haji How to cite: Saman, Haji Abdullah Bin Haji (1990) The development of modern education in Negara Brunei Darussalam with special reference to provision for the disabled, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6323/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN EDUCATION IN NEGARA BRUNEI DARUSSALAM WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PROVISION FOR THE DISABLED HAJI ABDULLAH BIN HAJI SAMAN The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Thesis submitted to the University of Durham in fulfilment of a degree of MA in Education Faculty of Social Sciences 2 5 JAN 1990 Dedicated to: ( Wife, Fatimah Binti Haji Lianaf; and My Daughters; Fatillah Amalina, Fatillah Hi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks to the Government of His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Dipertuan of Negara Brunei Darussalam for granting me a scholarship for my studies at the University of Durham, England.
    [Show full text]