DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Review of Monodontids Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Review of Monodontids Report GLOBAL REVIEW OF MONODONTIDS REPORT 13-16 March 2017 © North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Please cite this report as: NAMMCO (2018) Report of the NAMMCO Global Review of Monodontids. 13-16 March 2017, Hillerød, Denmark, Available at https://nammco.no/topics/sc-working-group-reports/ DISCLAIMER: The content of this report contains the view of the Symposium Expert Group and do not necessarily represent the views of the NAMMCO Scientific Committee or Council. NAMMCO Scientific Committee reviewed the draft report at its next meeting in November 2017 and NAMMCO Council was presented with the final report and the review results at its 26th meeting in March 2018. NAMMCO Postbox 6453, Sykehusveien 21-23, N-9294 Tromsø, Norway, +47 77687371, [email protected], www.nammco.no, www.facebook.com/nammco.no Report NAMMCO Global Review of Monodontids March 2017 Contents 1. WELCOME AND MEETING INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 5 2. CAFF/CBMP STATE OF THE ARCTIC MARINE BIODIVERSITY REPORT ............................................. 7 3. STOCK DEFINITION .................................................................................................................................. 8 4. BELUGAS ................................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Sakhalin-Amur ................................................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Ulbansky .......................................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Tugursky .......................................................................................................................................... 12 4.4 Udskaya ............................................................................................................................................ 13 4.5 Shelikhov ......................................................................................................................................... 14 4.6 Anadyr .............................................................................................................................................. 14 4.7 Cook Inlet ......................................................................................................................................... 15 4.8 Eastern Bering Sea ........................................................................................................................... 17 4.9 Bristol Bay ....................................................................................................................................... 17 4.10 Eastern Chukchi Sea ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.11 Eastern Beaufort Sea ........................................................................................................................ 19 4.12 Eastern High Arctic – Baffin Bay (Somerset Island) and West Greenland ..................................... 21 4.13 Western Hudson Bay ....................................................................................................................... 22 4.14 James Bay ........................................................................................................................................ 23 4.15 Eastern Hudson Bay ......................................................................................................................... 23 4.16 Ungava Bay ...................................................................................................................................... 25 4.17 Cumberland Sound ........................................................................................................................... 25 4.18 St Lawrence Estuary ........................................................................................................................ 26 4.19 Southwest Greenland ....................................................................................................................... 27 4.20 Svalbard ........................................................................................................................................... 28 4.21 Barents-Kara-Laptev Seas ................................................................................................................ 29 4.22 White Sea ......................................................................................................................................... 29 5. NARWHALS ...................................................................................................................................... 30 5.1 Somerset Island ................................................................................................................................ 31 5.2 Jones Sound...................................................................................................................................... 33 5.3 Smith Sound ..................................................................................................................................... 33 5.4 Admiralty Inlet ................................................................................................................................. 34 5.5 Eclipse Sound ................................................................................................................................... 35 5.6 Inglefield Bredning .......................................................................................................................... 36 5.7 Melville Bay ..................................................................................................................................... 37 5.8 Eastern Baffin Island ........................................................................................................................ 37 5.9 Northern Hudson Bay ...................................................................................................................... 38 3 Report NAMMCO Global Review of Monodontids March 2017 5.10 East Greenland ................................................................................................................................. 39 5.11 Northeast Greenland ........................................................................................................................ 40 5.12 Svalbard-Northwest Russian Arctic ................................................................................................. 40 6. BELUGAS AND NARWHALS: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ............................... 42 7. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND COOPERATION (BELUGAS AND NARWHALS) ................. 48 8. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 50 STOCK DISTRIBUTION MAPS ......................................................................................................................... 62 SUMMARY TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... 64 PARTICIPANT LIST ......................................................................................................................................... 79 AGENDA AND PROVISIONAL SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 80 4 NAMMCO Global Review of Monodontids 13-16 March 2017, Hillerød Denmark Report 1. WELCOME AND MEETING INFORMATION 1.1 Introduction Jill Prewitt, Scientific Secretary of NAMMCO, welcomed the participants (Appendix 1) to Hillerød and expressed the satisfaction of NAMMCO that this long-awaited review was taking place. She conveyed the deep regrets of the chair of the Planning Group, Arne Bjørge (IMR, Norway), who was not able to attend the meeting due to health issues, and thanked Rod Hobbs, the vice-chair, for agreeing to step in. She briefly introduced NAMMCO, summarized background for the Global Review, and acknowledged Christina Lockyer, the former NAMMCO General Secretary, for her efforts to launch this Global Review. She also thanked the other members of the Planning Group (Barry, Bjørge, Desportes, Ferguson, Guldborg-Hansen, Hobbs, Marcoux, Reeves, Shpak, Suydam) and noted that the Arctic Council’s Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) biodiversity working group had joined the effort to organise the review. Although Tom Barry (CAFF Secretariat) was unable to participate, his colleague Tom Christensen, co-chair of CAFFs Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP), attended. She also thanked the funders who made the Global Review possible, primarily NAMMCO, the Government of Greenland, Shell Oil and the US Marine Mammal Commission. 1.2 Chair’s welcome Hobbs, the meeting Chair, welcomed the participants and noted that the International Whaling Commission’s (IWC’s) Scientific Committee had reviewed the status of belugas and narwhals in 1992 (IWC 1993) and conducted a more thorough updated review of beluga stocks in 1999 (IWC 2000). Additionally, the NAMMCO Scientific Committee’s Working Group on the Population Status of Beluga and Narwhal in the North Atlantic carried out an extensive review in 1999 (NAMMCO 2000). A significant amount of new information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Established/Outsider Relations in Hérouxville
    Space without scales: established/outsider relations in Hérouxville Tim Nieguth Aurélie Lacassagne Laurentian University Abstract: In 1965, Norbert Elias and John Scotson published a seminal study on the dynamics of established/outsider relations. Their analysis has been criticized on several grounds, including its relative inattention to space. A number of recent studies have sought to build on Elias and Scotson's model by putting greater emphasis on space. These studies represent important interventions in the development of a relational approach to local established/outsider relations. Nonetheless, such an approach would benefit from further refinement. In particular, an Eliasian approach can be especially valuable to the study of local power relations and identity constructions if it takes into account the overlapping nature of configurations, emphasizes that individuals are simultaneously embedded in a large number of configurations, recognizes that different spatial contexts are not merely external resources to be manipulated by (local) actors, and refuses to treat conflicts that happen to play out in local contexts as purely local phenomena. Keywords: Established/outsiders, scale, immigration, national identity, settler societies, urban/rural divide Résumé: En 1965, Norbert Elias et John Scotson ont publié un ouvrage dressant les bases des études sur les logiques d’exclusion. Leur analyse a fait l’objet de plusieurs critiques dont le peu d’attention accordée à la question de l’espace. En s’inspirant des travaux de Norbert Elias et de John Scotson, de nouvelles recherches ont tenté de remédier à la situation en accordant plus d’attention aux enjeux d’espace. Du coup, ces études ont grandement contribué au développement d’une sociologie relationnelle.
    [Show full text]
  • NUNAVUT a 100 , 101 H Ackett R Iver , Wishbone Xstrata Zinc Canada R Ye C Lve Coal T Rto Nickel-Copper-PGE 102, 103 H Igh Lake , Izo K Lake M M G Resources Inc
    150°W 140°W 130°W 120°W 110°W 100°W 90°W 80°W 70°W 60°W 50°W 40°W 30°W PROJECTS BY REGION Note: Bold project number and name signifies major or advancing project. AR CT KITIKMEOT REGION 8 I 0 C LEGEND ° O N umber P ro ject Operato r N O C C E Commodity Groupings ÉA AN B A SE M ET A LS Mineral Exploration, Mining and Geoscience N Base Metals Iron NUNAVUT A 100 , 101 H ackett R iver , Wishbone Xstrata Zinc Canada R Ye C lve Coal T rto Nickel-Copper-PGE 102, 103 H igh Lake , Izo k Lake M M G Resources Inc. I n B P Q ay q N Diamond Active Projects 2012 U paa Rare Earth Elements 104 Hood M M G Resources Inc. E inir utt Gold Uranium 0 50 100 200 300 S Q D IA M ON D S t D i a Active Mine Inactive Mine 160 Hammer Stornoway Diamond Corporation N H r Kilometres T t A S L E 161 Jericho M ine Shear Diamonds Ltd. S B s Bold project number and name signifies major I e Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD 83 A r D or advancing project. GOLD IS a N H L ay N A 220, 221 B ack R iver (Geo rge Lake - 220, Go o se Lake - 221) Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. T dhild B É Au N L Areas with Surface and/or Subsurface Restrictions E - a PRODUCED BY: B n N ) Committee Bay (Anuri-Raven - 222, Four Hills-Cop - 223, Inuk - E s E E A e ER t K CPMA Caribou Protection Measures Apply 222 - 226 North Country Gold Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents
    NUNAVUT EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents Arts & Culture Alianait Arts Festival Qaggiavuut! Toonik Tyme Festival Uasau Soap Nunavut Development Corporation Nunatta Sunakkutaangit Museum Malikkaat Carvings Nunavut Aqsarniit Hotel And Conference Centre Adventure Arctic Bay Adventures Adventure Canada Arctic Kingdom Bathurst Inlet Lodge Black Feather Eagle-Eye Tours The Great Canadian Travel Group Igloo Tourism & Outfitting Hakongak Outfitting Inukpak Outfitting North Winds Expeditions Parks Canada Arctic Wilderness Guiding and Outfitting Tikippugut Kool Runnings Quark Expeditions Nunavut Brewing Company Kivalliq Wildlife Adventures Inc. Illu B&B Eyos Expeditions Baffin Safari About Nunavut Airlines Canadian North Calm Air Travel Agents Far Horizons Anderson Vacations Top of the World Travel p uit O erat In ed Iᓇᓄᕗᑦ *denotes an n u q u ju Inuit operated nn tau ut Aula company About Nunavut Nunavut “Our Land” 2021 marks the 22nd anniversary of Nunavut becoming Canada’s newest territory. The word “Nunavut” means “Our Land” in Inuktut, the language of the Inuit, who represent 85 per cent of Nunavut’s resident’s. The creation of Nunavut as Canada’s third territory had its origins in a desire by Inuit got more say in their future. The first formal presentation of the idea – The Nunavut Proposal – was made to Ottawa in 1976. More than two decades later, in February 1999, Nunavut’s first 19 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) were elected to a five year term. Shortly after, those MLAs chose one of their own, lawyer Paul Okalik, to be the first Premier. The resulting government is a public one; all may vote - Inuit and non-Inuit, but the outcomes reflect Inuit values.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem Overview
    i SUMMARY OF THE HUDSON BAY MARINE ECOSYSTEM OVERVIEW by D.B. STEWART and W.L. LOCKHART Arctic Biological Consultants Box 68, St. Norbert P.O. Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA R3V 1L5 for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans Central and Arctic Region, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 Draft March 2004 ii Preface: This report was prepared for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Central And Arctic Region, Winnipeg. MB. Don Cobb and Steve Newton were the Scientific Authorities. Correct citation: Stewart, D.B., and W.L. Lockhart. 2004. Summary of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem Overview. Prepared by Arctic Biological Consultants, Winnipeg, for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Winnipeg, MB. Draft vi + 66 p. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 2.0 ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW.........................................................................................................3 2.1 GEOLOGY .....................................................................................................................4 2.2 CLIMATE........................................................................................................................6 2.3 OCEANOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................8 2.4 PLANTS .......................................................................................................................13 2.5 INVERTEBRATES AND UROCHORDATES.................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • BAFFIN ISLAND 1953: TAGEBUCH EINER POLAR- Rale Du Nouveau Québec and the Commission Scolaire Du EXPEDITION
    REVIEWS • 253 HBC agents gave no credit. During this period the outside The final section of the book deals with Qumaq’s reflec- world intervened with the news of the war. In addition, tions from the vantage of age—changes, importance of the slow move to Puvirnituq and other settlements began, hunting and fishing, the divisions over James Bay, his dif- and prefabricated houses replaced the traditional tents and ficulties as he aged and experienced illnesses, the friends igloos. Employment at the trading post and the sale of stone who helped him, and his family, who had figured through- sculptures began to alter Inuit lives. out the narrative. Part three documents significant changes to Inuit life As befitting an individual with little formal school- from 1953 to the late 1960s. Central to these changes was ing, yet writing in syllabics, the style is relatively simple the introduction of federal aid: old age pensions, disabil- and straightforward. Besides the observations on changes ity allowances, and family allowances. The Bay began to in lifestyle, a strength of the book is the discussion on the purchase Inuit sculptures, though the author notes that each evolution of autonomy, whether in co-operatives, villages, manager had a different concept of their value (p. 81). Their or region, and especially the opposition to the James Bay attitude changed with the arrival of manager Peter Mur- agreement. In translating this work, Louis-Jacques Dorais doch in 1955. Under his management, there was a certain has done a great service by bringing Qumaq’s story to a stability, even though the Bay would still not allow Inuit to wider readership.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Water Diversion Schemes in North America: a Solution to Water Scarcity?
    Water Resources Management III 385 Massive water diversion schemes in North America: a solution to water scarcity? F. Lasserre Department of Geography, Laval University, Canada Abstract Massive water diversion projects have been proposed by engineers or public officials in the United States since 1951, but so far, only regional water transfers have been built, often at great cost and questionable economic benefit. Public opinions and governments are still worried in Canada and in the Great Lakes area that these projects could somehow be carried on. However, these massive undertakings prove to be poorly profitable compared to other means of water management, and are not necessary since water withdrawals are stabilizing in the United States, and other demand management techniques are emerging. Keywords: water supply, water diversion, aqueduct, water transfer, irrigation, water conflict, Canada, United States. 1 Massive water transfer projects were once considered Large-scale diversions of Great Lakes and Canada's waters have been discussed for several decades. Various proposals for transferring Canadian or Great Lakes water have emerged since the 1950s, beginning with the United Western Investigation in 1951, an extensive study conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation. The proposals have often been made by engineering corporations because of the obvious possibility to profit from large construction projects. Proposals to import water were also meant to satisfy rapidly growing urban areas like Phoenix and Las Vegas. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the top five fastest-growing cities in the U.S. from 2000 to 2002 were all in Arizona and Nevada. With this great influx of people to an area with no substantial supply of freshwater, the temptation to look at the large water reserves in northern United States and in Canada was strong.
    [Show full text]
  • NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas Cultural Heritage and Interpretative
    NTI IIBA for Phase I: Cultural Heritage Resources Conservation Areas Report Cultural Heritage Area: Dewey Soper and Interpretative Migratory Bird Sanctuary Materials Study Prepared for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 1 May 2011 This report is part of a set of studies and a database produced for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. as part of the project: NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas, Cultural Resources Inventory and Interpretative Materials Study Inquiries concerning this project and the report should be addressed to: David Kunuk Director of Implementation Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 3rd Floor, Igluvut Bldg. P.O. Box 638 Iqaluit, Nunavut X0A 0H0 E: [email protected] T: (867) 975‐4900 Project Manager, Consulting Team: Julie Harris Contentworks Inc. 137 Second Avenue, Suite 1 Ottawa, ON K1S 2H4 Tel: (613) 730‐4059 Email: [email protected] Report Authors: Philip Goldring, Consultant: Historian and Heritage/Place Names Specialist Julie Harris, Contentworks Inc.: Heritage Specialist and Historian Nicole Brandon, Consultant: Archaeologist Note on Place Names: The current official names of places are used here except in direct quotations from historical documents. Names of places that do not have official names will appear as they are found in the source documents. Contents Maps and Photographs ................................................................................................................... 2 Information Tables .......................................................................................................................... 2 Section
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC Exploration the SEARCH for FRANKLIN
    CATALOGUE THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHT ARCTIC EXPLORATION & THE SeaRCH FOR FRANKLIN WILLIAM REESE COMPANY 409 Temple Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 789-8081 A Note This catalogue is devoted to Arctic exploration, the search for the Northwest Passage, and the later search for Sir John Franklin. It features many volumes from a distinguished private collection recently purchased by us, and only a few of the items here have appeared in previous catalogues. Notable works are the famous Drage account of 1749, many of the works of naturalist/explorer Sir John Richardson, many of the accounts of Franklin search expeditions from the 1850s, a lovely set of Parry’s voyages, a large number of the Admiralty “Blue Books” related to the search for Franklin, and many other classic narratives. This is one of 75 copies of this catalogue specially printed in color. Available on request or via our website are our recent catalogues: 320 Manuscripts & Archives, 322 Forty Years a Bookseller, 323 For Readers of All Ages: Recent Acquisitions in Americana, 324 American Military History, 326 Travellers & the American Scene, and 327 World Travel & Voyages; Bulletins 36 American Views & Cartography, 37 Flat: Single Sig- nificant Sheets, 38 Images of the American West, and 39 Manuscripts; e-lists (only available on our website) The Annex Flat Files: An Illustrated Americana Miscellany, Here a Map, There a Map, Everywhere a Map..., and Original Works of Art, and many more topical lists. Some of our catalogues, as well as some recent topical lists, are now posted on the internet at www.reeseco.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Fisheries Management Plan for Narwhal in the Nunavut Settlement Area
    Integrated Fisheries Management Plan for Narwhal in the Nunavut Settlement Area Hunter & Trapper Organizations Consultations March 2012 Discussion Topics • Why changes are needed to narwhal co-management • Overview of the draft Narwhal Management Plan • Marine Mammal Tag Transfer Policy Development • HTO & hunter roles and responsibilities under the revised management system Why do we need changes to the Narwhal Management System? Increased national and international interest in how the narwhal fishery in Nunavut is managed. Strengthen narwhal co-management consistent with; • NLCA wildlife harvesting and management provisions such as • Establishing Total Allowable Harvest (TAH), Basic Needs Level (BNL) • Increased roles for Regional Wildlife Organizations (RWOs) and Hunters and Trappers Organizations (HTOs) • Available scientific and Inuit knowledge • Sustainable harvesting • International trade requirements Why do we need changes to the Narwhal Management System? International Exports • Must conform to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) • Canadian CITES Export Permits require a Non-Detriment Finding (NDF) • In 2010 and 2011, exports of narwhal products from some areas were not allowed • CITES Parties will meet in spring 2013, and may request a review of narwhal trade • If trade is deemed harmful to the survival of the species, trade restrictions or bans could be imposed. • Important that the Narwhal Management Plan is approved and implemented by January 2013 Importance of Improving the Narwhal Management System • Improvements to the narwhal management system will assist • Co-management organizations to clearly demonstrate that narwhal harvesting is sustainable • Continued sustainable harvest for future generations of Inuit • Continued trade/export of narwhal tusks and products from Canada • A formal Management Plan will outline the management objectives for narwhal and the measures to achieve sustainable harvesting.
    [Show full text]
  • 198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals
    198 13. Repulse Bay. This is an important summer area for seals (Canadian Wildlife Service 1972) and a primary seal-hunting area for Repulse Bay. 14. Roes Welcome Sound. This is an important concentration area for ringed seals and an important hunting area for Repulse Bay. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 15. Southampton-Coats Island. The southern coastal area of Southampton Island is an important concentration area for ringed seals and is the primary ringed and bearded seal hunting area for the Coral Harbour Inuit. Fisher and Evans Straits and all coasts of Coats Island are important seal-hunting areas in late summer and early fall. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 16.7.2 Communities Affected Communities that could be affected by impacts on seal populations are Resolute and, to a lesser degree, Spence Bay, Chesterfield Inlet, and Gjoa Haven. Effects on Arctic Bay would be minor. Coral Harbour and Repulse Bay could be affected if the Quebec route were chosen. Seal meat makes up the most important part of the diet in Resolute, Spence Bay, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay. It is a secondary, but still important food in Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. Seal skins are an important source of income for Spence Bay, Resolute, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay and a less important income source for Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. 16.7.3 Data Gaps Major data gaps concerning impacts on seal populations are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • First International Polar Year, 1882-83
    ARCTIC VOL. 34, NO. 4 (DECEMBER 1981), P. 370-376 First InternationalPolar Year, 1882-83 C .J . TAYLOR’ ABSTRACT. During 1882-83 eleven countries cooperated in a project to study the geophysics and geodesy of the polar regions by establishing 14 research stations. Three of these were located in Canada’s Arctic: one each by the United States, Germany and Britain. They accumulated dataon terrestial magnetism and boreal phenomena and brought back valuable informationon arctic living. This year will mark the 100th anniversary of the first mathematical work. With his colleague Wilhelm Weber he International Polar Year, probably the most ambitious of established in 1836 the Gottingen Magnetic Union(Mag- 19th-century international scientific projects and the fore- netische Verein) which united a world-wide network of runner of more recent cooperative ventures such as Inter- observatories. Gauss delineated the three categories of national Geophysical Year. Eleven countries launched 14 geomagnetic observations - declination, inclination, and expeditions - 12 in the Arctic and two in the southern intensity - and invented instruments for the accurate hemisphere - and the accumulated data furthered the measurement of these phenomena.He also deviseda sched- world’s knowledge of meteorology, geomagnetism and ule of observations so that data would be collected inthe boreal phenomena. Of the ten arctic researchstations that same way at identical times around the globe (Dictionary were ultimately established during IPY, three were in of Scientific Biography, 1972). Canada: Fort Rae (British), Lady FranklinBay, Ellesmere Meanwhile the British scientificestablishment was also Island (U.S.) and Clearwater Fiord,Baf€in Island (German). affected by positivist notions of fact gathering, and Auxiliary observatories were established by the German geomagnetic surveys became among the most ambitious polar year committeeat six Moravian missions Labradorin of its schemes.
    [Show full text]