Translation Series No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translation Series No \, 701. Pigment that had previously been scattered regrouped in such a way that a pigment band formed on the middle of the,tail, on the 12th to the 18th and most frequently on the 13th to the 15th myotomes (counting from the anus); in addition, a double row formed-on the lower edge of the tail and above the intestine. The band that formed on the middle of the tail in the prolarval stage remained as one throughout the entire larval stage, with the difference that it became narrower and subsequently occupied only two or three (the 15th to the 16th, the 111.th to the '16th, the 16th to the 17th, and the 16th to the 18th), and more frequently two (the 16th to the 17th),• myotomes. After the absorption of the yolk sac the large melanophores • /354 passed to the lower surface of the abdomen, .an the middle of which they formed a distinct pigment row that occasionally split in two. A few large, starry cells were located along both sides of this row. There was a i.ow of cells on the isthmus. Towards the moment of formation of rays the band on the middle of the tail disappearedl and in its place there remained single large eelanophores. Banded flounder larvae at this stage were fairly easily distinguished by a comparatively large number (11 to 13) of myotomes in the• trunk, the absence of melanophores in the depth of the body above the chord and by a slight pigmentation on the lower edge of the tail. The Arctic Flounder -_-_- Linpttn claninlls (Pallas) Information on the development of the arctic flounder is extremely meager. Reports on the reprodUction and egg sizes of _ 702. arctic flounder from the White Sea are available,in a study. by A.N. Nikolaey (1955). We have investigated artificially fertilized eggs which were kindly given to us by N.A. Pertsev, the Director . of the White Sea Biological Station of Moscow State University, as well as three prolaryae from 3.7 to 6.6 nm long and twelve larvae from 6.53 to_7.89 mm,long, caught with a plankton net from 21 July to 30 August 1946' in Kara Bay. The above prolaryae and larvae have been described by L.A. Ponomareya (1949). A comparison of this limited material with that on the banded flounder is.undoubtedly of great interest. The' eggs of the arctic flounder are pelagic, and at a salinity of 27 to 28%0 float in the open water. The membrane is thin and the yolk is colourless end transparent. The diameter of ripe White Sea arctic flounder eggs, according to Nikolaev, varies from 1.2 to 1.6 mm. The diameter ,of fixed eggs that we examined ranged from 1.54 to 1.70 min. The periyitelline space in live-eggs. _ represented a narrow aperture, whose size after fixation. increased as a result • . of the shrinking of the yolk. • Prolaryae (evidently recently hatched) 3.7 min long (see fig. 51) had a large yolk sac. Their heads were straightened and separated from the yolk sac to the level of the forward edge and middle of the auditory capsule, „.;• 4' • 703. The pigmentation of the body was of an embryonic. nature. Large melanophores were thickly scattered over the .entire body of the Prolarva„ and there was a small quantity on the intestineand the yolk sac. The eyes were dark. Prolarvae from 6.35 to 6.66 mmulong . (see fig. 51, 2) had a fairly large yolk sac 0.90 to 1.29 mm long and 0.32 • to 0.42 mm high. The tail was long and the distance from the end of the snout to the insertion of the anal fin represented 35.7 to 36.7% of the length of the body. The pectoral fins were small, and their ends reached the fourth myotome. To judge from the base, which was situated vertically, they were mobile. • in the body. There were 11 + 26 myotomesi A mesenchymal accumulation was noticeable under the urostyle, in the place of the - hypurals. The pigment lost its embryonic nature., and of it there remained a small number of cells scattered on the tail; the trunk was practically devoid of pigment. A somewhat indistinct accumulation of melanophores was noticeable on the tail around the 16th myotome, and there was a row of such melanophores on the lower edge of the tail. In older larvae 6.53 to 7.12 lulu long the yolk sac . had been absorbed. The pigmentation. changed little in comparison with the preceding stage: the number of scattered melanophores decreased on the tail and increased on the lower portion of the forward half of the intestine. In older larvae 7.89 (7.58 to 7.71) mrn. long, caught on 30 August . 1946 at Ustt-Kara, the myotomes were sigmoid. The-height of 1 704.. the body represented 11.1 to 11.6% of its length. At the • base of the dorsal and anal fin folds there appeared the /355 stripes of pterygiophores, from which there branched out fin rays, the length of most of which still _did not exceed 1/3 .of the height of the fin folds. They rthe fin-rayg were best developed in the central area. Their mumber decreased progressively towards the front and the rear, and at the beginning and end of the fin folds they were entirely absent. Thera were 24 to 35 rays in the dorsal fin fold and 22 to 27 in the anal fold. 3 Figure 51- Prolarvae and larvae of L. glacialis. 1... 3.7 min (after Ponomareva); 2- 6.7 mm; 3- 7.1 mm • Thee intestine formed a full loop, which was still small and situated in the rear portion of the abdominal cavity. The urostyle was curved slightly upwards, and under it were outlined the hypurals and the tail fin rays. - • Pigment was for the most part still of a larval • nature, with the difference that the number of'scattered melanophores decreased on the upper portion of the tail and • 705. the pigmentary cells themoelves became much larger. The *melanophores which. had been under the urostyle extended alông the length of the outlined tail fin rays. - . In larvae 7.96 (6.98) mm long the height of the body increased to 18.3% of its length. .The fin rays, with the •exception of the first and last three to four in the dorsal end anal fins, were differentiated. Thèy were noticeably longer than in the preceding stage and fell slightly short of the edges of the fin folds. There were about 50 rays in the dorsal fin and about 38 in the anal fin. Eight or nine fin rays were outlined in the tail. • The intestinal loop filled the entire rear half of the - abdominal cavity. The end of the rectum was pulled somewhat forward as compared with its position in the preceding stage. The pigmentation of the right and left sides was 1.■ asymmetrical. On the right side there was a large number of small, scattered melanophores on the head and the forward portion of the trunk, and a few larger starry cells in Various areas of the tail. - .- =- The first spot of the upper row of the tâil was outlined and was also visible on the left side. The left side of the body, with the exception of one pigmentary cell remaining from a band on the middle of the tail, and a few cells on the end of the intestine and the lower edge of the tail, was devoid of pigment. • .* 706. The change in the proportions of the body in the course of development of the prolarvae and larvae that have been described is shown in Table 53. Table 53 /356 ■ 1 The Correlation of Body Parts of Prolarvae and Larvae of L,r1Palal,i5 Percentage of length Percentage of length . Length, in mra Number of of body of head specimens aA H 1C 0 aa V // I 1 "1 / 6 ,35-6 ,66 2 35 ,7-36 ,7 4 ,16-4 ,7 13,75 28 ,5-33 ,0 16 ,4-16 ,6 6 ,53-7 ,12 9 33 ,3-37 ,7 4 ,5-5 ,1 1,3 ,25-14 ,6 27 ,1-27 ,6 15 ,1-19 ,0 6 ,93-7 ,89 3 37,4-41,0 11 ,i-18,3 18 ,45-23 ,2 19 ,74-22 ,1 17 ,45-19 ,1 As may be seen from the data in Table 53, during the period of development the following changes take place in the parts of the bodies of larvae: the distance from the end of the snout to the insertion of the anal fin, the height of the body, the length of the head, and the length of the snout increase, and the eyes -decrease in size. In fingerlings 28 mm long, caught on 11 August 1945 with a fingerling trawl in Baidarata Bay, both eyes were on the right side, and the fingerlings' metamorphosis had evidently long been completed. Juvenile fish 98 mm long had the appearance of adults. The Black Flounder -- Lluzettu_db_smana. (Herzenstein) . We have given a brief outline of the structure of black flounder eggs in published keys to the.pelagic eggs ' 707. of fish of Peter the Great Bay (Pertseva-Ostroumova, 1955). .The development of prolarvae and larvae from 3.5 to 58 mm in length under artificial conditions has been traced by Kurata (1956). We studied embryonic and postembryonic development - in series obtained through the artificial fertilization and incubation of eggs. Brood stock was taken from fyke nets set out under the ice in the region around Vladivostok, off Cape Burnyi and in the area adjacent to the 19th kilometre station of the Maritime Railway, as well as by fishing with Danish seines of the Tafuin.Fish Combine in Ussuri Bay and Anna Bay.
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Larvae of Three Arctic Species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae)
    Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) Morgan S. Busby, Deborah M. Blood & Ann C. Matarese Polar Biology ISSN 0722-4060 Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by 2017. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) 1 1 1 Morgan S. Busby • Deborah M. Blood • Ann C. Matarese Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 26 June 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Identification of fish larvae in Arctic marine for L. proboscidea in comparison to the other two species waters is problematic as descriptions of early-life-history provide additional evidence suggesting the genus Limanda stages exist for few species. Our goal in this study is to may be paraphyletic, as has been proposed in other studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2018/027 Central and Arctic Region Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically Significant Species, Functional Groups and Community Properties (ESSCP) in the Western Arctic Biogeographic Region D.G. Cobb1, S. MacPhee1, J. Paulic1, K. Martin1, V. Roy2, J. Reist1, C. Michel1, A. Niemi1, E. Richardson3, and A. Black4 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada Freshwater Institute 501 University Crescent Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N6 2Canadian Museum of Nature PO Box 3443, Station D Ottawa, ON, K1P6P4 3Environment and Climate Change Canada Eastgate Offices 9250 – 49th Street Edmonton, AB, T6B 1K5 4Environment and Climate Change Canada 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON, K1A 0H3 November 2020 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Cobb, D.G., MacPhee, S., Paulic, J., Martin, K., Roy, V., Reist, J., Michel, C., Niemi, A., Richardson, E., and Black, A. 2020. Information in Support of the Identification of Ecologically Significant Species, Functional Groups and Community Properties (ESSCP) in the Western Arctic Biogeographic Region. DFO Can.
    [Show full text]
  • Taste Preferences in Fish
    FISH and FISHERIES, 2003, 4, 289^347 Taste preferences in ®sh Alexander O Kasumyan1 & Kjell B DÖving2 1Department of Ichthyology,Faculty of Biology,Moscow State University,119992 Moscow,Russia; 2Department of Biology, University of Oslo, N-0136 Oslo, Norway Abstract Correspondence: The ¢sh gustatory system provides the ¢nal sensory evaluation in the feeding process. Alexander O Unlike other vertebrates, the gustatory system in ¢sh may be divided into two distinct Kasumyan, Department of subsystems, oral and extraoral, both of them mediating behavioural responses to food Ichthyology,Faculty items brought incontact withthe ¢sh.The abundance of taste buds is anotherpeculiarity of Biology,Moscow of the ¢sh gustatory system. For many years, morphological and electrophysiological State University, techniques dominated the studies of the ¢sh gustatory system, and systematic investiga- 119992 Moscow, tions of ¢sh taste preferences have only been performed during the last 10 years. In the Russia E-mail: present review,basic principles in the taste preferences of ¢sh are formulated. Categories alex_kasumyan@ or types of taste substances are de¢ned in accordance with their e¡ects on ¢sh feeding mail.ru behaviour and further mediation by the oral or extraoral taste systems (incitants, sup- pressants, stimulants, deterrents, enhancers and indi¡erent substances). Information Received17July 2002 on taste preferences to di¡erent types of substances including classical taste substances, Accepted3April 2003 free amino acids, betaine, nucleotides, nucleosides, amines, sugars and other hydrocar- bons, organic acids, alcohols and aldehydes, and their mixtures, is summarised. The threshold concentrations for taste substances are discussed, and the relationship between ¢sh taste preferences with ¢sh systematic positionand ¢sh ecology is evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • BSAI Other Flatfish Assessment
    Chapter 11 Assessment of the Other flatfish stock complex in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands by Thomas K. Wilderbuer and Daniel G. Nichol Executive Summary Summary of Changes in Assessment Inputs Changes in the Input Data 1) The 2012 catch (total and discarded) was updated, and catch through 18 October, 2012 were included in the assessment. 2) The 2012 Eastern Bering Sea shelf and slope and Aleutian Islands trawl survey biomass estimates and standard errors of other flatfish species are included in the assessment. Changes in the Assessment Methodology 1) There were no changes in the assessment methodology. Summary of Results A summary of the 2012 recommended ABCs and OFLs (in bold) relative to the 2011 recommendations for Other flatfish in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands (BSAI) is as follows: As estimated or As estimated or specified last year for: recommended this year for: Quantity 2012 2013 2013 2014 M (natural mortality rate) for rex sole 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 M (natural mortality rate) for Dover sole 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.085 M (natural mortality rate) for all others 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Tier 5 5 5 5 Biomass (t) 111,060 111,060 114,200 114,200 FOFL (F=M)for rex sole 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 FOFL (F=M)for Dover sole 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.085 FOFL (F=M)for all other species 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 maxFABC for rex sole 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 maxFABC for Dover sole 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.064 maxFABC for all other species 0.113 0.113 0.113 0.113 FABC for rex sole 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 FABC for Dover sole 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.064 FABC for all other species 0.113 0.113 0.113 0.113 OFL (t) 17,100 17,100 17,800 17,800 maxABC (t) 12,700 12,700 13,300 13,300 ABC (t) 12,700 12,700 13,300 13,300 As determined last year for: As determined this year for: Status 2012 2013 2013 2014 Overfishing n/a n/a n/a n/a Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments Specific to this Assessment There were no comments or requests from the 2012 December SSC meeting pertaining to BSAI Other flatfish.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 9 OTHER FLATFISH by Paul D. Spencer, Gary E. Walters
    CHAPTER 9 OTHER FLATFISH by Paul D. Spencer, Gary E. Walters, and Thomas K. Wilderbuer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The other flatfish species complex had previously included Alaska plaice, which are assessed with an age-structured population model. Because the 2002 harvest specifications separated Alaska plaice from the other flatfish complex, the assessment of Alaska plaice has been presented as a separate chapter in this SAFE document. The assessment of the remaining other flatfish, excluding Alaska plaice, is presented in this chapter. The following changes have been made to this assessment relative to the November 2001 SAFE: Changes in the input data 1) The 2001 catch (total and discarded) was updated, and catch through 28 September, 2002 were included in the assessment. 2) 2002 trawl survey biomass estimates and standard errors of other flatfish species were included in the assessment. Changes in assessment methodology 1) The tier 4 approach in previous assessments of applying the flathead sole F40 and F35 fishing rates is examined with respect to the available data for the other flatfish complex, and it is recommended that this complex be assessed under tier 5. A natural mortality rate of 0.20 was used for the tier 5 calculations, based upon values used in age-structured analyses of BSAI flatfish. A summary of the harvest recommendations for 2003 (under tier 5) is compared to the tier 4 recommendations used in the 2002 assessment. 2001 Assessment 2002 Assessment recommendations recommendations (Tier 4) (Tier 5) Exploitable biomass 78,293 t 106,739 t ABC 18,065 t 14,691 t Overfishing 21,832 t 19,588 t FABC F0.40 = 0.30 0.15 Foverfishing F0.35 = 0.38 0.20 INTRODUCTION Prior to 2001, the “other flatfish” species complex included Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus).
    [Show full text]
  • F Latfishes Families Bothidae, Cvnoalossidae, and F'leuronectidae
    NORTHEAST PAC IF IC F latfishes Families Bothidae, Cvnoalossidae, and F'leuronectidae Ponald E, Kramer a i@i!liam H. Bares Brian C. F'aust + Barry E. Bracken illustrated by Terry Josey Alaska 5ea Grant Col/egeProgram Universityor Alaska Fa>rbanks P.O.Pox 755040 Fairbanks,Aiaska 99775-5040 907! 474-6707 ~ Fax 907! 47a 5285 Alaska Rshenes0eveioprnent Foundation 508 West seoono'Avenue, suite 212 Anonorage.Alaska 99501-2208 Marine Advisory Bulletin No. 47 a 1995 a $20.00 ElmerE. RasmusonLibrary Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guide to northeast Pacific flatfishes: families Bothidae, Cynoglossidae, and Pleuronectidae/by Donald E. Kramer ... Iet al,l Marine advisory bulletin; no. 47! 1. Flatfishes Identification. 2. Flattishes North Pacific Ocean. 3. Bothidae. 4. Cynoglossidae.5, Pleuronectidae. I. Kramer,Donald E. II. AlaskaSea Grant College Program. III. AlaskaFisheries Development Foundation. IV, Series. QL637.9.PSG85 1995 ISBN 1-5 !t2-032-2 Credits Thisbook is the resultof work sponsoredby the Universityof AlaskaSea GrantCollege Program, which is cooperativelysupported by the U.S,Depart- mentof Commerce,NOAA Office of SeaGrant and ExtramuralPrograms, undergrant no. NA4f! RG0104, projects A/7 I -01and A/75-01, and by the Universityof Alaskawith statefunds. The Universityof Alaskais an affirma- tive action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution. SeaGrant is a unique partnership with public and private sectors com- bining research,education, and technologytransfer for public service,This national network of universities meets
    [Show full text]
  • Other Flatfish
    CHAPTER 10 OTHER FLATFISH by Paul D. Spencer, Gary E. Walters, and Thomas K. Wilderbuer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following changes have been made to this assessment relative to the November 2002 SAFE: Changes in the input data 1) The 2002 catch (total and discarded) was updated, and catch through 20 September, 2003 were included in the assessment. 2) 2003 trawl survey biomass estimates and standard errors of other flatfish species were included in the assessment. Changes in assessment results 1) A summary of the harvest recommendations for 2003 is compared to the recommendations used in the 2002 assessment is as follows: 2002 Assessment 2003 Assessment recommendations recommendations Exploitable biomass 106,739 t 90,327 t ABC 14,691 t 13,549 t Overfishing 19,588 t 18, 065 t FABC 0.15 0.15 Foverfishing 0.20 0.20 INTRODUCTION The Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands “other flatfish” group have typically included those flatfish besides rock sole, yellowfin sole, arrowtooth flounder, and Greenland turbot. Flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon) were part of the other flatfish complex until they were removed in 1995, and Alaska plaice was removed from the complex in 2002, as sufficient biological data exists for these species to construct age-structured population models. In contrast, survey biomass estimates are the principal data source used to assess the remaining other flatfish. Although over a dozen species (Table 1) of flatfish are found in the BSAI area, the other flatfish biomass consists primarily of starry flounder, rex sole, longhead dab, and butter sole. Catch History The miscellaneous species found in the other flatfish species category are listed in Table 1, and their catches from 1995-2003 are shown in Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Acknowledgements...............................................93 Introduction............................................................1 Whitefishes.............................................................8 Arctic Cisco (Qaaktaq) .............................................................. 9 Bering Cisco (Tiipuq) .............................................................. 12 Broad Whitefish (Aanaakdiq) ................................................... 14 Humpback Whitefish (Pikuktuuq) ....................................... 17 Least Cisco (Iqalusaaq) ........................................................... 19 Round Whitefish (Savigunnaq) ............................................. 22 Inconnu (Siibruaq)............................................... ........ ............ 24 Char......................................................................26 Dolly Varden Char (Iqalukpik) ............................................. 27 Arctic Char (Paiqfuk) ............................................................... 29 Lake Trout (Iqaluaqpak) ......................................................... 31 Pacific.Salmon.....................................................33 Chum Salmon (Iqalugruaq) ................................................... 34 Chinook Salmon (Iqalugruaq)............................... ..... .......... 36 Red Salmon Photo ................................................................... 37 Pink Salmon (Amaqtuuq) ...................................................... 38 Other.Freshwater.Fishes.....................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact of the Invasive European Flounder (Platichthys Flesus) on the Native European Plaice (Pleuronectes Platessa) on Nursery Grounds in Iceland
    Master’s thesis Ecological impact of the invasive European flounder (Platichthys flesus) on the native European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) on nursery grounds in Iceland Theresa Henke Advisor: Guðbjörg Ásta Ólafsdóttir, Ph.D. University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, May 2018 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Guðbjörg Ásta Ólafsdóttir, Ph.D. Reader: Camille Leblanc, Ph.D. Program Director: Catherine Chambers, Ph.D. Theresa Henke Ecological impact of the invasive European flounder (Platichthys flesus) on the native European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) on nursery grounds in Iceland 45 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2018 Theresa Henke All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, Reykjavík, May 2018 ii Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. __________________________________________ Theresa Henke iii iv Abstract In recent years the number of invasive species that have been introduced to new environments has strongly increased, and their further distribution may be favored by both anthropogenic influence and climate change. In 1999, the European flounder (Platichthys flesus), a flatfish species native to central European coasts, was first identified in the southwest of Iceland at the mouth of the Ölfusa river and has since then spread around the whole country. This project investigated the ecological impact of juvenile flounder on juveniles of the native European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) on nursery grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List of Threatened and Declining Species of Lampreys and Fishes of the Baltic Sea
    Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 109 HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species of lampreys and fishes of the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 109 HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species of lampreys and fishes of the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Editor: Dr. Ronald Fricke, Curator of fishes, Ichtyology Contact address: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Photographs © BfN, Krause & Hübner. Cover photo: Gobius niger For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited to as: HELCOM 2007: HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species of lampreys and fish of the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings, No. 109, 40 pp. Information included in this publication or extracts there of is free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above. Copyright 2007 by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission - Helsinki Commission ISSN 0357-2944 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................6 2 Species and area covered.............................................................................................7 2.1 Species covered..............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog
    Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photographs of various fish studied for this report. Background photograph shows Arctic icebergs and ice floes. Photograph from iStock™, dated March 23, 2011. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog By Lyman K. Thorsteinson and Milton S. Love, editors Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Disclaimer: This Scientific Investigations Report has been technically reviewed and approved for publication by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The information is provided on the condition that neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of this information. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]