Technical Report 02-06

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical Report 02-06 National Cooperative for the nagra Disposal of Radioactive Waste TECHNICAL REPORT 02-06 Project Opalinus Clay Models, Codes and Data for Safety Assessment Demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste (Entsorgungsnachweis) December 2002 Hardstrasse 73, CH-5430 Wettingen/Switzerland, Telephone +41-56-437 11 11 National Cooperative for the nagra Disposal of Radioactive Waste TECHNICAL REPORT 02-06 Project Opalinus Clay Models, Codes and Data for Safety Assessment Demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste (Entsorgungsnachweis) December 2002 Hardstrasse 73, CH-5430 Wettingen/Switzerland, Telephone +41-56-437 11 11 This report was prepared by a project team consisting of (in alphabetical order): Peter Gribi (Vibro- Consult AG, Brugg), Richard Klos (Aleksandria Sciences, UK), Georg Kosakowski (Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen), Gerhard Mayer (Colenco Power Engineering AG, Baden), Peter Robinson (Quintessa Ltd., UK), Paul Smith (Safety Assessment Management Ltd., UK), with contributions from many other individuals. The figures were prepared by Bruno Kunz and Claudia Frei (Nagra). The project was managed by Jürg Schneider and Piet Zuidema. ISSN 1015-2636 "Copyright © 2002 by Nagra, Wettingen (Switzerland) / All rights reserved. All parts of this work are protected by copyright. Any utilisation outwith the remit of the copyright law is unlawful and liable to prosecution. This applies in particular to translations, storage and processing in electronic systems and programs, microfilms, reproductions, etc." I NAGRA NTB 02-06 Summary The present report is designed to provide readers with the necessary information to perform, if they so wish, independent checks of the results of the evaluation of the "assessment cases" described in the Safety Report (Nagra 2002c) for Project Entsorgungsnachweis. It also describes the conceptual models and corresponding codes for the near field, geosphere and biosphere that were used in the safety assessment to evaluate the assessment cases, including the reasons why they are considered adequate for their intended purposes, and the operational elements and procedures that were used to manage the required large number of calculations. Models and codes not described in this report are the supporting models used to derive parameter values for the near field, geosphere and biosphere codes, and to support model assumptions. These include, for example, groundwater flow models, mechanistic models of sorption, temperature evolution models, waste dissolution models, etc., and are described in the Project Entsorgungs- nachweis reference reports. An assessment case is a specific set of assumptions regarding the broad evolution of the repository and its environment, the conceptualisation of individual features, events and pro- cesses (FEPs) relevant to the fate of radionuclides within the disposal system and the parameters used to describe these FEPs. In the safety assessment, a broad range of assessment cases is analysed in order to illustrate the impact of various detrimental FEPs and uncertainties on the level of safety provided by the disposal system. The assessment cases are defined, the underlying reasoning documented and the results of their analysis presented in the Safety Report. In the interests of transparency, the Safety Report presents these descriptions in a mainly qualitative fashion, without exhaustively documenting all relevant formulae and data. The present report complements the Safety Report with a comprehensive description of models, codes and data and thus provides traceability within the safety assessment. The two reports together satisfy the assessment principle (see Chapter 2 of the Safety Report) that the develop- ment of the safety case and its results should be documented in manner that provides both transparency and traceability. In the safety assessment for Project Entsorgungsnachweis, assessment cases are divided into a number of groups, according to the issues or uncertainties that they address. The main part of the present report focuses, in turn, on groups of assessment cases that explore: • the consequences of particular scenario, conceptual and parameter uncertainties, where this range can be bounded with reasonable confidence on the basis of available scientific under- standing, • more speculative "what if?" possibilities that are considered in order test the robustness of the disposal system, • various design or system options, and • different stylised possibilities for the characteristics and evolution of the surface environ- ment ("biosphere"). Overviews are given of the conceptual models underlying the assessment cases and the various assumptions and simplifications that are made in order to arrive at sets of mathematical equations and input parameters so that each case can be evaluated using corresponding computer codes, with references to appendices that give detailed descriptions of the codes and the equations that they solve, as well as tables containing the data used and the data source. In the appendices, descriptions are given of the capabilities of each code in terms of the phe- nomena (or "Super-FEPs") that they address. This is important within the FEP management procedure to allow an evaluation of the suitability of a given code to address a given Super-FEP NAGRA NTB 02-06 II (Nagra 2002d). It is shown that the codes used are sufficiently versatile to evaluate all the required assessment cases. There are a few safety-relevant phenomena that the codes are not "qualified" to evaluate, but, in all cases, either significant effects can be ruled out by supple- mentary studies (e.g. for criticality), effects are intrinsically favourable to safety and can be conservatively neglected (e.g. transport resistances in the SF / HLW near field), or parameters (e.g. canister breaching time) can be chosen to ensure that calculations err on the side of pessimism. In addition to the models and codes used to analyse the assessment cases, simplified insight models are used to examine particular aspects of system performance and sensitivity to key system properties and model assumption. The insight models are described in Chapter 9. The deterministic evaluation of assessment cases is complemented by probabilistic calculations to build further system understanding and, in particular, to indicate the performance of the system for parameter combinations not analysed by deterministic calculations. The computa- tional tool used to sample input parameters from probability density functions (PDFs) and the PDFs themselves are described in Appendices 2 and 3, respectively. Except for a few cases, no justifications are given in the present report for the model assump- tions made and no final or intermediate results are presented, except where this is considered to help understanding. For a full presentation of results and a justification of assumptions, the reader is referred to the Safety Report and the reference reports. It is, however, noted that all assessment cases are evaluated using, to some extent, pessimistic or conservative conceptual assumptions, parameters and model simplifications, resulting in calcu- lated doses that should be regarded as upper bounds for, rather than predictions of, expected doses. To assess the degree of bias introduced by such assumptions, the modelling approaches used to evaluate each assessment case are examined systematically in Chapter 10. It first sum- marises the various assumptions and simplifications made in order to arrive at sets of mathe- matical equations and input parameters so that each case can be quantitatively evaluated, and then it assesses these assumptions and simplifications in terms of their degree of realism, pessimism or conservatism. This information is then used as a tool to systematically assess the bias that has been introduced into the models ("bias audit"). III NAGRA NTB 02-06 Zusammenfassung Der vorliegende Bericht hat zum Ziel, alle Informationen zu dokumentieren, die für den unab- hängigen Nachvollzug der in Nagra (2002c) enthaltenen Resultate aller Rechenfälle für das Projekt Entsorgungsnachweis notwendig sind. Er beschreibt die konzeptuellen Modelle und entsprechenden Rechencodes für das Nahfeld, die Geosphäre und die Biosphäre, die in der Sicherheitsanalyse für die Durchführung der Rechenfälle Verwendung fanden, sowie die in der Datenverarbeitung der grossen Anzahl durchzuführender Rechenfälle benutzten Werkzeuge. Der Bericht nennt ferner die Gründe, wieso die eingesetzten Rechencodes als für den vorgesehe- nen Verwendungszweck geeignet gelten. Nicht im vorliegenden Bericht dokumentiert sind die Modelle und Rechencodes, die für die Herleitung von Parameterwerten für die Nahfeld-, Geosphären- und Biosphären-Rechencodes und für die Begründung von Modellannahmen Ver- wendung fanden. Hierzu gehören zum Beispiel Grundwassermodelle, mechanistische Sorptions- modelle, Temperaturverlaufsmodelle und Abfallauflösungsmodelle. Diese Modelle und Rechen- codes sind in den Referenzberichten des Projekts Entsorgungsnachweis beschrieben. Ein Rechenfall ist definiert durch die spezifische Konzeptualisierung bestimmter Vorgänge und Ereignisse (abgekürzt mit der englischen Bezeichnung FEPs für „features, events and processes“), die für den Verbleib der Radionuklide im Lagersystem relevant sind, sowie durch die in der Modellierung dieser FEPs benutzten Parameter. In der Sicherheitsanalyse werden
Recommended publications
  • 0 Qsummary Mark
    Beijing (CHN) World Championships 22-30 August 2015 综合成绩 / SUMMARY 男子掷铁饼 / Discus Throw Men - Qualification With qualifying standard of 65.00 (Q) or at least the 12 best performers (q) advance to the Final RECORDS RESULT NAME COUNTRY AGE VENUE DATE World Record WR 74.08 Jürgen SCHULT GDR 26 Neubrandenburg (Jahn Sportpark) 6 Jun 1986 Championships Record CR 70.17 Virgilijus ALEKNA LTU 33 Helsinki (OS) 7 Aug 2005 World Leading WL 68.29 Piotr MALACHOWSKI POL 32 Cetniewo (OPO) 1 Aug 2015 27 August 2015 RANK PLACE GROUP BIB NAME COUNTRY DATE of BIRTH RESULT 1 1 A 623Fedrick DACRES JAM 28 Feb 94 65.77 Q 戴克斯 福德瑞克 1994 年2月28 日 2 2 A 802 Piotr MALACHOWSKI POL 07 Jun 83 65.59 Q 马拉科夫斯基 皮奥特里 1983 年6月7日 3 1 B 449 Gerd KANTER EST 06 May 79 64.78 q 坎特 赫尔德 1979 年5月6日 4 3 A 386 Apostolos PARELLIS CYP 24 Jul 85 64.41 q 帕雷利斯 阿波斯托罗斯 1985 年7月24 日 5 2 B 811Robert URBANEK POL 29 Apr 87 64.23 q 乌尔巴内科 罗伯特 1987 年4月29 日 6 3 B 553Christoph HARTING GER 04 Oct 90 64.23 q 哈廷 克里斯托夫 1990 年10 月4日 7 4 A 592 Vikas GOWDA IND 05 Jul 83 63.86 q 高达 维卡斯 1983 年7月5日 8 5 A 226 Philip MILANOV BEL 06 Jul 91 63.85 q 米拉诺夫 菲利普 1991 年7月6日 9 6 A 921Daniel STÅHL SWE 27 Aug 92 62.66 q 斯托尔 丹尼尔 1992 年8月27 日 10 7 A 184Julian WRUCK AUS 06 Jul 91 62.63 q 拉克 朱利安 1991 年7月6日 11 4 B 359Mauricio ORTEGA COL 04 Aug 94 62.54 q 奥尔特加 毛里西奥 1994 年8月4日 12 5 B 175Benn HARRADINE AUS 14 Oct 82 62.48 q 哈拉代 本恩 1982 年10 月14 日 13 8 A 844Victor HOGAN RSA 25 Jul 89 62.41 霍根 维克多 1989 年7月25 日 14 9 A 725Andrius GUDŽIUS LTU 14 Feb 91 62.22 古德休斯 安德留斯 1991 年2月14 日 15 6 B 558Daniel JASINSKI GER 05 Aug 89 61.70 亚辛斯基 丹尼尔
    [Show full text]
  • Discus Throw
    12th IAAF World Championships in Athletics Berlin From Saturday 15 August to Sunday 23 August 2009 Discus Throw MEN ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHL Qualification ROUND RESULTS ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC Qualification standard 64.50 or at least best 12 qualified 18 August 2009 TIME TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY Start 10:04 18 °C 68 % Group A End 10:52 19 °C 64 % RANK BIB NAME NAT YEAR START RESULT 1 2 3 1 551 Robert HARTING GER 84 8 66.81 Q 66.81 2 390 Gerd KANTER EST 79 2 66.73 Q 66.73 3 1201 Casey MALONE USA 77 6 65.13 Q 65.13 4 381 Mario PESTANO ESP 78 3 65.03 Q 65.03 5 1006 Bogdan PISHCHALNIKOV RUS 82 7 62.93 q 62.93 61.09 60.08 6 339 Omar Ahmed EL GHAZALY EGY 84 15 62.84 q 62.84 62.09 X 7 399 Aleksander TAMMERT EST 73 10 62.24 62.24 61.93 59.44 8 1245 Ian WALTZ USA 77 14 62.04 X 60.27 62.04 9 137 Benn HARRADINE AUS 82 4 61.74 60.73 61.74 60.79 10 874 Gaute MYKLEBUST NOR 79 11 60.80 X 60.80 X 11 482 Bertrand VILI FRA 83 9 60.68 60.68 X X 12 113 Jorge BALLIENGO ARG 78 13 59.19 56.69 55.32 59.19 13 1158 Oleksiy SEMENOV UKR 82 12 58.78 58.78 57.31 X 14 1059 Daniel SCHÄRER SUI 85 5 58.50 58.50 58.23 57.22 623 Haider Naser ABDULSHAHEED IRQ 81 1 NM X X X 1 2 Issued Tuesday, 18 August
    [Show full text]
  • HEMISPHERES Hemispheres
    HEMISPHERES Hemispheres The Tufts University Journal of International Affairs A Tufts University Student Publication Vol. 31, 2008 Vol. HEMISPHERES Mayer Campus Center Tufts University Medford, MA 02155 [email protected] http://ase.tufts.edu/hemispheres International Migration VOL. 31, 2008 HEMISPHERES Hemispheres The Tufts University Journal of International Affairs A Tufts University Student Publication Vol. 31, 2008 Vol. HEMISPHERES Mayer Campus Center Tufts University Medford, MA 02155 [email protected] http://ase.tufts.edu/hemispheres International Migration VOL. 31, 2008 Hemispheres The Tufts University Journal of International Affairs Vol. 31 2008 Editor-in-Chief Nicholas D. Malouta Assistant Editors Treasurer and Outreach Christopher Giliberti Coordinator Arun Yang Benjamin Sacks Photography Editors Layout Editor Kalpana Ganti Ernest Kim Scott Newton Design Editor Events Coordinator Suh Lee Adrienne Serafin National Solicitation Editors-at-Large Coordinator Christine Loftus Cory Siskind Ashley Semler Benjamin Filippo Established in 1976, Hemispheres is the Tufts University Journal of International Affairs. The Journal addresses a variety of social, economic, political, and legal issues, both contemporary and historical, within the framework of international relations. The articles contained herein reflect diverse views of undergraduates at Tufts, as well as other universities. While the Editorial Board is solely responsible for the selection of articles appearing in Hemispheres, the Board does not accept responsibility for any opinions or biases contained within. Correspondence should be addressed to: Hemispheres, Mayer Campus Center #52, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155. Hemispheres is distributed without charge to the students, faculty and administration of Tufts University. For further information about Hemispheres, please refer to our website at http://ase.tufts.edu/hemispheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Discus Throw 2018
    Club - 66 m throwers at 06.09.2018 07.06.1966 Ludvík Daněk 06.01.1937 CZE 66.06 1 Long Beach, California 25.05.1968 Jay Silvester 27.08.1937 USA 66.54 1 CalR Modesto, California 16.05.1971 Timothy Vollmer 13.09.1946 USA 67.38 2 Lancaster, California 03.07.1971 Géza Fejér 20.04.1945 HUN 66.92 1 v-ROM Budapest 02.09.1971 János Murányi 13.01.1944 HUN 66.38 1 Budapest 10.07.1972 Richard Bruch 02.07.1946 SWE 66.16 1 Mölndal 05.05.1973 John Powell 25.06.1947 USA 66.62 1 San José, California 13.07.1973 Siegfried Pachale 24.10.1949 GDR 66.18 1 Cottbus 29.07.1973 Pentti Kahma 03.12.1943 FIN 66.30 1 Ylivieska 10. 03.04.1974 John Van Reenen 26.03.1947 RSA 68.04 1 Port Elizabeth 01.06.1975 Mac Wilkins 15.11.1950 USA 66.48 1 Rio Vista, California 22.06.1975 Wolfgang Schmidt 16.01.1954 GDR 66.80 1 v-GBR, ROM Dresden 21.08.1975 Markku Tuokko ¶ 24.06.1951 FIN 66.40 1 Skövde 25.04.1976 Norbert Thiede 03.04.1949 GDR 66.90 1 Rostock 31.07.1976 Vladimir Lyakhov 17.06.1937 RUS 66.04 1 Tallinn 01.04.1977 Kenneth Stadel 19.02.1952 USA 66.52 1 TexR Austin, Texas 27.05.1977 Hein-Direck Neu ¶ 13.02.1944 FRG 68.08 1 Bremerhaven 15.06.1977 Alwin Wagner 11.08.1950 FRG 66.52 1 Bebra 22.07.1977 Arthur Swarts ¶ 14.02.1945 USA 66.48 1 Scotch Plains, New Jersey 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Jahresrückblick 2012 Distelberger Und Schrott Sind NÖLV-Athleten 2011 Nach Dem Sieg Bei Der ÖLV-Athletenwahl Gewann Hürdensprinterin Beate Schrott (Union St
    1220 Wien, Erzherzog Karl-Straße 108 Tel./Fax: +43 (0)1/ 203 62 11 [email protected], www.noelv.info, www.noelv.eu/downloads/Jahresrueckblick_2012.pdf (siehe auch /Jahresrueckblick_2013.pdf, /Jahresrueckblick_2011.pdf) ZVR-Zahl: 494316663 Jahresrückblick 2012 Distelberger und Schrott sind NÖLV-Athleten 2011 Nach dem Sieg bei der ÖLV-Athletenwahl gewann Hürdensprinterin Beate Schrott (Union St. Pölten) nun auch die NÖLV-Wahl. Mehrkämpfer Dominik Distelberger (UVB Purgstall) setzte sich bei den Männern durch. Knappe Entscheidung bei den Frauen Bei der Wahl zur Athletin des Jahres war es knapp an der Spitze. Beate Schrott gewann knapp vor Marathonläuferin Tanja Eberhart (ULC Hirtenberg) und Mittelstrecken Läuferin Jennifer Wenth (SVS Leichtathletik). Drei österreichische Rekorde und als erste Österreicherin unter 13 Sekunden lief Beate Schrott 2011 über die 100m Hürden. Für Olympia 2012 in London ist sie außerdem fix qualifiziert. Tanja Eberhart nahm 2011 an der Cross- und der U23-Europameisterschaft teil und war mit 2:44:11h schnellste Österreicherin beim Vienna City Marathon. Beate Schrott Jennifer Wenth zeigte bei der Cross-EM in diesem Jahr mit der besten österreichischen Platzierung (10.) auf. Außerdem nahm sie an der Hallen- und U23-EM teil. Distelberger souverän Bei den Männern holte sich Mehrkampfass Dominik Distelberger (UVB Purgstall) den Sieg vor Martin Strasser und Gerhard Mayer (beide SVS-Leichtathletik). Bereits Anfang 2011 holte sich Dominik Distelberger den 12. Platz in der Siebenkampf-Weltrangliste. Beim traditionellen Mehrkampfmeeting in Götzis stelle er mit 7840 Punkten eine neue persönliche Bestleistung im Zehnkampf auf. Der Speerwurf-Routinier aus Schwechat Martin Strasser zeigte ebenfalls eine starke Saison. Er wurde österreichischer Meister mit 67,23m und war in den letzten sieben Jahren immer auf dem Stockerl.
    [Show full text]
  • Discus Throw
    12th IAAF World Championships in Athletics Berlin From Saturday 15 August to Sunday 23 August 2009 Discus Throw MEN ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHL Qualification START LIST ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC ATHLETIC RESULT NAME NAT AGE DATE VENUE WR74.08 Jürgen SCHULT GDR 266 Jun 1986 Neubrandenburg CR70.17 Virgilijus ALEKNA LTU 337 Aug 2005 Helsinki WL71.64 Gerd KANTER EST 3025 Jun 2009 Kohila Qualification standard 64.50 or at least best 12 qualified Group A 18 August 2009 10:05 START BIB NAME NAT YEAR PERSONAL BEST 2009 BEST 1 623 Haider Naser ABDULSHAHEED IRQ 81 59.77 2 390 Gerd KANTER EST 79 73.38 71.64 3 381 Mario PESTANO ESP 78 69.50 66.63 4 137 Benn HARRADINE AUS 82 66.37 64.40 5 1059 Daniel SCHÄRER SUI 85 63.55 63.55 6 1201 Casey MALONE USA 77 68.49 68.49 7 1006 Bogdan PISHCHALNIKOV RUS 82 65.88 65.58 8 551 Robert HARTING GER 84 68.65 68.10 9 482 Bertrand VILI FRA 83 63.66 63.66 10 399 Aleksander TAMMERT EST 73 70.82 65.17 11 874 Gaute MYKLEBUST NOR 79 63.32 62.85 12 1158 Oleksiy SEMENOV UKR 82 65.40 60.60 13 113 Jorge BALLIENGO ARG 78 66.32 62.72 14 1245 Ian WALTZ USA 77 68.91 64.47 15 339 Omar Ahmed EL GHAZALY EGY 84 66.58 66.34 1 2 Issued Monday, 17 August 2009 at 12:10 Timing
    [Show full text]
  • UEFA Champions League Through Japanese Eyes Football For
    2.04 UEFA Champions League 03 Through Japanese eyes 06 Football for disabled people 09 Youth No. 22 – February 2004 competitions 12 COVER IN THIS ISSUE Second round At the end of February, the UEFA of the youth competitions 12 Champions League enters its direct UEFA Champions League knock-out phase. All eyes will first knock-out round 03 Executive again be on the starball, including those Committee elections 15 of Marcelo Zalayeta (Juventus). Football in Japan 06 News from PHOTO: BONGARTS Football for disabled people 09 member associations 17 Focus onEditorial European football A new calendar year is ahead of us but we are in the middle of the UEFA club competition season. I have just taken over from Gerhard Aigner as the CEO of UEFA. It is one of the most interesting jobs in football and, together with my colleagues, I will continue building on the founda- tions laid down by Mr Aigner in serving European football in the best possible way. The new format of the UEFA Champions League has been a success. After an interesting group stage we are now entering the knock-out stage, with some very exciting matches on the pro- gramme. We are just finalising the fine- tuning of the new format for the UEFA Cup, so as to be prepared for an interesting start to next season. The most challenging and important project in European club football in recent years is now under implementation. I am referring to the UEFA club licensing system which comes into force for qualification next season. All member associations and leagues are taking part in developing club football towards better finances and infrastructure which will safeguard the future of our game.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Parapsychology
    1 J OURNAL OF P ARA P SYCHOLOGY R HINE R ESEARCH C ENTER Volume 82, Number 1 Spring 2018 ISSN 0022-3387 1 Journal of Parapsychology Volume 82, Number 1 Spring 2018 ISSN 0022-3387 2 Journal of Parapsychology Editor-in-Chief Previous Editors Etzel Cardeña, Lund University, Sweden Founding editors: William McDougall and Joseph Banks Rhine. Past editors: Betty M. Humphrey, Gardner F. Murphy, John A. Associate Editors Palmer, Dorothy H. Pope, J. G. Pratt, K. Ramakrishna Rao, Lou- John Palmer, Rhine Research Center, USA isa E. Rhine, Bernard F. Riess, W. G. Roll, C. E. Stuart Chris A. Roe, University of Northampton, UK Caroline Watt, University of Edinburgh, UK Editorial Staff Statistical Associate Editor Nikolaos Koumartzis, Layout Editing Jessica Utts, University of California, Irvine, USA Robert Gebelein, Business Manager Book Reviews Editor Shawnee Phillips, Finances Carlos Alvarado, Sofia University. The Journal of Parapsychology, founded in 1937, is published 2-3 Editorial Board times a year by The Rhine Research Center, 2741 Campus Walk Carl Martin Alwood, University of Gothenburg, Sweden Ave., Building 500, Durham, NC 27705. The Journal publishes Pascal Baseilhac, Ki France, Tours, France original reports of experimental research in parapsychology, as Vilfredo De Pascalis, Sapienza Universitá di Roma, Italy well as research reviews, methodological, theoretical, and histor- Renaud Evrard, University of Lorraine, France ical papers, abstracts, and selected invited addresses from Para- Miguel Farias, Coventry University, UK psychological Association conventions, book reviews, and letters. Morris Freedman, University of Toronto, Canada. Christopher C. French, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK Print and electronic version of the Journal are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Why South Africa Received the 2010 FIFA World Cup
    Africa's place in the International Football System - Why South Africa received the 2010 FIFA World Cup By Mark-Marcel Muller Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts International Studies at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Dr Janis van der W esthuizen Department Political Science University of Stellenbosch March 2007 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I, the un{4.ersigned. M4-.r:".~ ~ JMr.~(. /!..~ /ft:C ..... .. hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously submitted it in its entirety or in part at any university for a degree Date Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract For millions of people around the globe, football is an important part of every-day life. Similarly, many African governments have found in international football competitions one of the few opportunities to be internationally represented. Furthermore, through successful participation of their respective national football sides, they internally seek to foster nationhood. In fact, football is an integral part of African self-esteem with regards to being recognised by the rest of the world. However, to succeed in international sports means to succeed in a politico-economic structure far from equality and general solidarity. This thesis goes about the question why South Africa received the FIFA 2010 World Cup. Thereby it will distinguish the position of the African continent within the international football system. This mega sport event which takes place every four years receives global attention. For a nation to be chosen by the world football body FIFA to host this event elevates a nation to an equal participant in the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Schedule.Xlsx
    Date Baton Rouge Berlin Morning Time Time Sex Event Round Saturday 8/15 3:05 AM 10:05 M Shot PutQualification Saturday 8/15 3:10 AM 10:10 W 100 Metres Hurdles Heptathlon Saturday 8/15 3:50 AM 10:50 W 3000 Metres Steeplechase Heats Saturday 8/15 4:00 AM 11:00 W Triple Jump Qualification Saturday 8/15 4:20 AM 11:20 W High Jump Heptathlon Saturday 8/15 4:40 AM 11:40 M 100 Metres Heats SaturdaSaturdayy 88/15/15 55:00:00 AM 12:00M Hammer Throw QQualificationualification Saturday 8/15 5:50 AM 12:50 W 400 Metres Heats Saturday 8/15 6:00 AM 13:00 M 20 Kilometres Race Walk Final Saturday 8/15 6:20 AM 13:20 M Hammer ThrowQualification Afternoon session Saturday 8/15 11:15 AM 18:15 M 1500 Metres Heats Saturday 8/15 11:20 AM 18:20 W Shot Put Heptathlon Saturday 8/15 11:50 AM 18:50 M 100 Metres Quarter-Final Saturday 8/15 12:00 PM 19:00 W Pole Vault Qualification Saturday 8/15 12:25 PM 19:25 W 10,000 Metres Final Saturday 8/15 1:15 PM 20:15 M Shot Put Final Saturday 8/15 1:20 PM 20:20 M 400 Metres Hurdles Heats Saturday 8/15 2:10 PM 21:10 W 200 Metres Heptathlon Date Baton Rouge Berlin Date Time Time Morning session Sex Event Round Sunday 8/16 3:05 AM 10:05 W Shot PutQualification Sunday 8/16 3:10 AM 10:10 W 800 Metres Heats Sunday 8/16 3:45 AM 10:45 W Javelin Throw Qualification Sunday 8/16 4:00 AM 11:00 M 3000 Metres Steeplechase Heats Sunday 8/16 4:35 AM 11:35 W Long Jump Heptathlon SundaSundayy 88/16/16 44:55:55 AM 11:11:5555 W 100 Metres Heats Sunday 8/16 5:00 AM 12:00 W 20 Kilometres Race Walk Final Sunday 8/16 5:15 AM 12:15 W Javelin Throw
    [Show full text]
  • Discus Throw 2019.Xlsx
    Club - 67 m throwers at 17.07.2019 18.09.1968 Jay Silvester 27.08.1937 USA 68.40 1 Reno, Nevada 21.09.1969 Rickard Bruch 02.07.1946 SWE 68.06 1 Malmö 16.05.1971 Timothy Vollmer 13.09.1946 USA 67.38 2 Lancaster, California 03.04.1974 John Van Reenen 26.03.1947 RSA 68.04 1 Port Elizabeth 25.05.1974 John Powell 25.06.1947 USA 68.06 1 CalR Modesto, California 10.07.1974 Ludvík Daněk 06.01.1937 CZE 67.18 1 Praha 24.04.1976 Mac Wilkins 15.11.1950 USA 69.18 1 MSR Walnut, California 12.05.1976 Wolfgang Schmidt 16.01.1954 GDR 68.04 1 Berlin 29.05.1976 Siegfried Pachale 24.10.1949 GDR 67.54 1 Karl-Marx-Stadt 10. 21.05.1977 Kenneth Stadel 19.02.1952 USA 67.90 2 CalR Modesto, California 27.05.1977 Hein-Direck Neu ¶ 13.02.1944 FRG 68.08 1 Bremerhaven 14.08.1977 Markku Tuokko ¶ 24.06.1951 FIN 67.06 1 EP Helsinki 12.10.1977 Ferenc Tégla 15.07.1947 HUN 67.38 1 Szentes 13.08.1978 Velko Velev ¶ 04.01.1948 BUL 67.82 1 Rīga 07.04.1979 Alfred Oerter 19.09.1936 USA 67.00 1 Westfield, New Jersey 12.05.1979 Knut Hjeltnes ¶ 08.12.1951 NOR 69.50 1 CalR Modesto, California 07.10.1979 Arthur Swarts ¶ 14.02.1945 USA 67.18 1 Scotch Plains, New Jersey 23.03.1980 Juri Dumtšev 05.08.1958 RUS 67.26 1 Leselidze 14.04.1980 Benjamin Plucknett ¶ 13.04.1954 USA 67.14 1 Salinas, California 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Teilnehmer Und Bessere Leistungen
    Nummer 13 | 07.08.2008 ……………………………............. Alfred Proksch Österreichs ältester Leichtathlet geht auf seinen 100-er zu Seite 8 EDITORIAL „Ni hao!“ Olympia ruft Johann Gloggnitzer ÖLV Präsident Vorolympisches 8.8.2008 – ein besonders Datum: Beginn der Olympischen Spiele in Peking. Und wie jedes Mal vor den Spielen gab es die Diskussionen um die Nominierung der österreichischen Mannschaft. Von unseren neun Athletinnen und Athleten, die im Herbst in den Olympiakader nominiert wurden, haben sich letztendlich nur drei für Olympia qualifiziert. Zwei Dopingfälle, eine überraschende Schwangerschaft und einige weitere Aktive knapp an der ÖOC-Norm haben zum kleinen Olympiateam geführt. Statistikern fällt allerdings auf, dass die Olympiateams unseres Landes seit Barcelona 1992 immer kleiner werden. 14 von 28 olympischen Sommersport- verbänden haben schlussendlich nur Ni hao (Hallo) Peking: Günther Weidlinger, Eva Maria Gradwohl & Gerhard Mayer. (F: Seeböck) mehr 70 Sportlerinnen und Sportler (inklusive einiger Grenzfälle) zum österreichischen Olympiateam bei- gesteuert. Titelstory: Olympische Spiele Peking 1 Günther Weidlinger, Gerhard Mayer und Mit drei Aktiven liegt die Leichtathletik im Porträt Günther Weidlinger 4 Eva Maria Gradwohl vertreten Durchschnitt. Das darf aber klarerweise nicht unser Anspruch für die Zukunft Bilanz Austrian Top4 5 Österreichs Leichtathletik bei den Olympischen Spielen in Peking. Das sein. Für Peking überhaupt nicht Porträt Alfred Proksch 6 qualifiziert sind die in der Vergangenheit engagierte Team hat gleich zu Beginn Summer Youth Olympic Games 7 so erfolgreichen Sportarten der Leichtathletikbewerbe ihre Auftritte. Leserbrief: Selbstverliebte Funktionäre? 9 Gewichtheben, Moderner Fünfkampf, Bestenliste, Mixed Zone, Impressum 10 Ringen, Bogenschießen, Rudern… Wie seit Jahrzehnten nicht werden die Offensichtlich gibt es dort ähnliche Sportbewerbe in Peking von politischen Probleme, wie bei uns.
    [Show full text]