This Work Has Been Submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
This work has been submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research. Thesis Title: Individual lability, perceived stress, participant/researcher interaction, goal intention and PKRNG effects Creator: Drennan, S. L. R Example citation: Drennan, S. L. (2015) Individual lability, perceived stress, participant/researcher interaction, goalintention and PKARNG effects. Doctoral thesis. The University of Northampton. Version: Accepted version T http://nectar.Cnorthampton.ac.uk/8833/ NE 1 Individual Lability, Perceived Stress, Participant/Researcher Interaction, Goal-Intention and PK-RNG Effects Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy At the University of Northampton 2015 Sophie Louise Drennan © [Sophie Louise Drennan] [2015]. This thesis is copyright material and no quotation from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The process of this thesis over a six year period has involved a large number and variety of people who have played different roles. Initial gratitude most go to the Bial Foundation, Portugal for providing the bursary to complete the empirical studies. My hearty thanks must go to the people who volunteered to be participants for the three empirical research studies as without them, none of this research would be possible. They graciously allowed me to take up their time with my literally ‘random’ tests during the first three years and enabled me to remember what exactly it is I enjoy about conducting active research. Further thanks must go to the individuals at the University of Northampton who supported me through some of the most difficult periods. Particular mention must go the Psychology Technicians, (‘the boys’), Ian Maxwell and Drew Munn, who not only assisted with a lot of the technical details for the empirical studies, but whose helter-skelter room was a haven away from away from all the hub-bub and made me laugh at my own foibles. In addition, Roz Collings, who was (and still is) a friend before she joined my Supervisory team and without whose straight-talking, no-nonsense approach I would be in a far less able position. That woman knows her stuff. To Dr Christine Simmonds-Moore who allowed the use of her newly developed psychometric tool for the empirical studies – just when you need a measure of PK, one happens to come along at exactly the right time. David Watson, who has to wrangle us Postgraduate students into some kind of order and hears and sees everything and Simone Apel, who had the patience to coach me through some of the final hurdles. Also, to Dr Chris Roe and Dr Richard Broughton, my Director of Studies and former Second Supervisor – if it wasn’t for their involvement, I would have thrown in the towel a long while ago. They have enabled me to remember how strong I actually am in the face of adversity. Lastly, those friends and family members who have stood on the side-lines cheering me on, even if they weren’t quite sure what it was I was actually doing for all of these six years. Their support has been invaluable: my parents Andrew Drennan and Coral Drennan; my sisters Sasha Drennan and Beth Garrard; Jessica Twinberrow; Sarah Metcalfe; Lottie Brookes; Leanne, Amy and Lily Merrigan – for the laughter and tears, and for knowing the importance in this process for the tremendous amount of coffee, cups of tea, cake and wine. Finally, my beloved Fat Cat, Boo – formerly a stray at the University of Northampton Park Campus and my unofficial office cat. Never underestimate the power of pets to get you through those soulless nights of angst. 3 ABSTRACT The research within this thesis has been concerned with the concept of individual lability and how this may impact the occurrence of psychokinetic (PK) effects. Although frequently used as a descriptor within the fields of psychology, parapsychology has attempted to explore individual lability as a construct in its own right. Defined as an ‘ease of change’, within parapsychological research individual lability has been afforded the ability to either act as a contributing or mediating factor in the production of PK effects. To that effect, a major concern for this thesis was to operationalize the construct of individual lability via the development of a psychometric measure – an initial Lability Scale and then a further Revised Lability Scale. In order to make sense of the theoretical assumptions about individual lability this thesis explores the background of the production of PK effects in both real-world and experimental environments. It identifies shared individual elements in the reports of PK effects relating to heightened arousal, neurological activity, personality traits, emotional states and creativity that may help to identify multiple dimensions of individual lability. Drawing on the perspectives of lability models which emphasize an interaction between differing lability levels of random systems as a predictor of PK effects, it is suggested that successful outcomes are more likely between high levels of one system and low levels of another system. For the purposes of the three empirical studies a Random Number Generator (RNG) with different levels of Table, Pseudo and Live were employed to explore this interaction. An initial online survey consisting of measures of creative, neurological, state and Openness to Experience enabled the creation of the 71-item, 5 factor Lability Scale (LS) using factor analysis. Factors were defined as: Intuitive Cognition, Conceptual Cognition, Ego-Orientated Cognition, Emotional Interpretation and Analytical Cognition. The LS had good internal reliability and did not correlate with additional measures of anomalous experience and PK experiences, thus demonstrating face-value validity. The LS was subsequently employed in a series of three PK-RNG experiments exploring the lability interaction which incorporated a standardised design of a computerised I Ching task measured using the Q-sort method and separate group samples (N = 50). Study One included the impact of perceived stress, Study Two included the impact of the participant/research interaction, Study Three included the impact of goal-orientated striving. The primary hypothesis that levels of individual lability (Low, Medium, High) would significantly interact with Q-sort ratings of RNG system lability was not supported for all three experiments. In addition, the impact of the additional variables 4 was non-significant. However, significant correlations were found between all of the LS factors apart from Analytical Cognition. It was also observed that there was a significant difference between lability levels between genders, with males on average having lower lability levels. In addition, a final analysis combining the individual and RNG lability data from all three studies was conducted, although there was also no significant interaction effect found between levels of individual and RNG lability. However, following the consistent lack of response from the Analytical Cognition factor it was deemed necessary to psychometrically refine the Lability Scale further. Therefore, a second factor analysis was conducted on the combined experimental data (N = 147) and the 32-item, 3 factor Revised Lability Scale was developed. Three identified factors were defined as: Creative Expression, Emotional Interpretation and Spiritual Interpretation. It was noted that the factor structure was somewhat reversed to that of the initial LS but the majority of items remained consistent. However, analysis showed that there was no interaction found between levels of individual lability and RNG lability. There were significant relationships between Creative Expression and Table RNG and Pseudo RNG lability levels. In addition, consistent difference between the genders in relation to the three factors were found with large effect sizes, with males having significantly lower levels overall. The final Discussion questioned the lack of significant findings for the lability PK-RNG interaction in relation to the complexity of the methodology and the multiple variables introduced in the empirical studies. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 14 1.1. Psychokinesis ................................................................................................................. 14 1.2. Lability ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.3. Theories of lability as a mechanism for PK effects ....................................................... 16 1.3.1. Summary ................................................................................................................. 17 1.4. Outline of Thesis Structure ............................................................................................ 18 1.4.1. Chapter Three ......................................................................................................... 18 1.4.2. Chapter Four ........................................................................................................... 18 1.4.3. Chapter Five ............................................................................................................ 19 1.4.4. Chapter Six ............................................................................................................. 20 1.4.5. Chapter Seven ........................................................................................................