DOCSLIB.ORG

UNHCR Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNUAL TRIPARTITE CONSULTATIONS ON RESETTLEMENT Geneva, 18 – 19 June 2003 ___________________________________________ UNHCR PROJECTED GLOBAL RESETTLEMENT NEEDS 2004 Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2004 Table of Contents Table of Preliminary Projections -------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 AFRICA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Great Lakes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Refugees in Burundi Refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) Refugees in Rwanda Refugees in United Republic of Tanzania East and Horn of Africa ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Refugees in Eritrea Refugees in Ethiopia Refugees in Kenya Refugees in Somalia Refugees in Sudan Refugees in Uganda West and Central Africa ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20 Refugees in Benin Refugees in the Central African Republic (CAR) Refugees in Côte d'Ivoire Refugees in Gabon Refugees in Ghana Refugees in Guinea Refugees in Liberia Refugees in Nigeria Refugees in Sierra Leone Southern Africa ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31 Refugees in Angola Refugees in South Africa, Namibia and Mozambique Refugees in Zambia and Zimbabwe THE AMERICAS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 35 Refugees in Costa Rica Refugees in Cuba Refugees in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Belize Refugees in Venezuela, Panama, Peru, Ecuador, Surinam, and Guyana Refugees in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay ASIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39 South Asia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 39 Refugees in India Refugees in Nepal Refugees in Sri Lanka East Asia and Pacific ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 42 Refugees in China and Hong Kong Refugees in Indonesia Refugees in Malaysia Refugees in Thailand EUROPE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 46 Eastern Europe ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 46 Refugees in Armenia Refugees in Azerbaijan Refugees in Belarus Refugees in Georgia Refugees in Russian Federation Refugees in Ukraine South-Eastern Europe --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51 Refugees in Albania Refugees in Bosnia and Herzegovina Refugees in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Refugees in Serbia and Montenegro Southern Europe --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 56 Refugees in Turkey Refugees in Cyprus Refugees in Malta CASWANAME ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59 Central Asia --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 60 Refugees in Kazakhstan Refugees in Kyrgyzstan Refugees in Tajikistan Refugees n Turkmenistan Refugees in Uzbekistan South-West Asia ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 Refugees in Iran Refugees in Pakistan North Africa and The Middle East ----------------------------------------------------------- 65 Refugees in Egypt Refugees in Iraq Refugees in Jordan Refugees in Lebanon Refugees in Saudi Arabia Refugees in Syria Refugees in Yemen UNHCR Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2004 Sub-Region* Country of Asylum** Needs*** Capacity Africa Great Lakes Burundi 500 500 Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) 715 115 Rwanda 4,000 1,380 Tanzania 2,000 2,000 East and Horn of Africa Eritrea 1,195 115 Ethiopia 6,000 3,000 Kenya 6,000 6,000 Somalia 225 225 Sudan 1,000 1,000 Uganda 550 550 West and Central Africa Benin 29 29 Central African Republic (CAR) 380 40 Côte d’Ivoire 15,000 15,000 Gabon 2,000 300 Ghana 1,525 1,525 Guinea 4,540 4,540 Liberia 215 30 Nigeria 190 190 Sierra Leone 8,000 500 Southern Africa Angola 225 225 South Africa, Namibia and Mozambique 207 207 Zambia and Zimbabwe 3,340 600 Africa TOTAL: 57,836 38,071 The Americas Costa Rica 600 300 Cuba 55 55 Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El 20 20 Salvador, Nicaragua and Belize Venezuela, Panama, Peru, Ecuador, 900 500 Surinam and Guyana Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, 15 15 Uruguay, Paraguay America TOTAL: 1,590 890 Asia South Asia India 200 200 Nepal 20 20 Sri Lanka 30 30 East Asia and Pacific China and Hong Kong 314 314 Indonesia 176 176 Malaysia 695 234 Thailand 435 305 Asia TOTAL: 1,870 1,279 1 Europe Eastern Europe Armenia 3 3 Azerbaijan 195 195 Belarus 41 41 Georgia 900 150 Russian Federation 377 377 Ukraine 350 40 South-Eastern Europe Albania 40 40 Bosnia and Herzegovina 120 120 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 50 50 Serbia and Montenegro 500 500 Southern Europe Turkey 3,000 3,000 Cyprus 15 15 Malta 50 50 Europe TOTAL: 5,641 4,581 CASWANAME Central Asia Kazakhstan 60 60 Kyrgyzstan 240 240 Tajikistan 50 50 Turkmenistan 47 47 Uzbekistan 250 250 South-West Asia Iran 2,000 1,500 Pakistan 1,000 1,000 North Africa and the Egypt 4,000 3,000 Middle East Iraq 600 600 Jordan 1,000 1,000 Lebanon 1,200 1,200 Saudi Arabia 200 200 Syria 1,000 1,000 Yemen 40 40 CASWANAME TOTAL: 11,687 10,187 GLOBAL TOTAL: 78,624 55,008 * Region and Sub-region: Countries in this report are grouped according to the established regional boundaries as covered by the geographic Bureaux of UNHCR. ** Country of Asylum: Figures indicate resettlement need and expected submissions according to countries of asylum, not by country of origin. *** Needs and Capacity: Where possible, this report indicates both the number of refugees considered by UNHCR to be in need of resettlement, as reported by individual Field Offices, and the anticipated number of resettlement submissions given the capacity of that Field Office. 2 GLOBAL RESETTLEMENT NEEDS IN 2004 Introduction This report provides an overview of UNHCR’s projection of both resettlement needs among refugee populations of concern to UNHCR, as identified by UNHCR Field Offices, and anticipated resettlement submissions for 2004. The document is intended to help the reader appreciate the various situations in which UNHCR and the international community are responding to resettlement need, to assist resettlement countries in planning their activities, and to assist UNHCR in prioritising its activities and allocation of resources. The conditions and needs presented in this document have been synthesised from Country Operation Plans (COPs) submitted by UNHCR Field Offices for 2004. While preparing their COPs for 2004, all Field Offices undertook a six-step exercise to proactively plan for future resettlement needs of refugee populations under their responsibility and to identify the resources required to meet that resettlement need. As part of the exercise, Field Offices were requested to subdivide each refugee population under their responsibility into large categories reflecting group characteristics, such as country of origin, ethnicity or religion. These groups were then further sub-divided according to characteristics linked to their refugee experience, such as cause and date of flight or political affiliation. Field Offices were then requested to consider the current protection needs and durable solutions prospects in the medium to long term for each sub-group. If resettlement was identified as the most appropriate durable solution for the sub-group, or for sections of the sub-group, the Field Office was requested to identify the relevant submission category or categories that would best apply to the group, according to Chapter 4 of the Resettlement Handbook. The process also called for both the identification of actual resettlement need within the refugee population and an estimation of how many refugees the office would be able to process for resettlement given their current resettlement capacity and staffing levels. In this respect, the process is part of on-going efforts to more comprehensively assess resettlement needs and to adequately plan for resource requirements associated with achieving the goal of enhanced resettlement activities worldwide. The figures specified in this report are the total number of persons UNHCR anticipates submitting for resettlement from a given country in 2004. Where possible, and where a dramatic difference between resettlement need and capacity has been identified, this report highlights how limited capacity in many Field Offices results in only a portion of refugees in need of resettlement being submitted for the consideration of resettlement countries. At the same time, it is important to note that the resettlement needs specified here are those reported by individual Field Offices. Additional needs are generally believed to exist, but Field Offices require additional support to more thoroughly and comprehensively assess this need. The resettlement requirements estimated by UNHCR in this report are not exhaustive nor can be seen as definitive. Clearly, variable factors such as new protection emergencies and 3 changing conditions in countries of asylum and origin will affect resettlement needs throughout the year. Furthermore, administrative capacity and human resource limitations may have an impact
Recommended publications
  • Donor Profiles

    Donor Profiles

    Donor Profiles Australia Earmarked at the Sectoral Level: Australia: 636,047 (RSD in Nauru) USD 13,763,992 of which USD 7,295,918 unrestricted (53%), USD 5,652,911 earmarked at the sub-regional Supplementary Programme Budget level (40%), USD 84,794 earmarked at the country Earmarked at the Sub-Regional Level: level (1%), USD 730,369 earmarked at the sectoral South-West Asia: 5,652,911 (Protection and level (6%). Integration Activities for Displaced Afghans) Annual Programme Budget Earmarked at the Sectoral Level: Earmarked at the Country Level: Indonesia: 94,322 (Information on Durable Papua New Guinea: 84,794 (Establishment of Port Solutions for East Timorese Refugees) Moresby Office) Austria USD 239,897 of which 100% unrestricted. List of Sectors and Symbols A: Community Services B: Crop Production/Livestock/Fisheries/Forestry Belgium C: Domestic Needs/Household Support D: Education USD 5,979,900 of which USD 1,705,287 unrestricted E: Food (29%), USD 2,995,223 earmarked at the sub- F: Health/Nutrition regional level (50%), USD 1,279,390 earmarked G: Income Generation at the sectoral level (21 %). H: Legal Assistance/Protection I: Operational Support (to Agencies) Annual Programme Budget J: Sanitation Earmarked at the Sub-Regional Level: K: Shelter/Other Infrastructure Great Lakes Region: 2,558,791; West and Central L: Transport/Logistics Africa: 436,432 M: Water N: Programme Support Earmarked at the Sectoral Level: Belgium: 49,086 (UNHCR Brussels) Undefined Global Programmes Supplementary Programme Budget HQs: Headquarters Earmarked at the Sectoral Level: Operational Reserve Afghanistan: 986,207 (C, L, Administrative Support) Junior Professional Officers • Amounts mentioned are based on the value of contributions Junior Professional Officers: 244,097 • Included in this section are donors who contributed USD 100,000 and above.
  • Annual Report 2008 EN

    Annual Report 2008 EN

    THE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OMBUDSMAN) THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN Provision and protection of human rights and freedoms in Azerbaijan Summary of the Annual Report for 2008 Baku 2009 1 FOREWORD The first Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan is concluding her seven years’ activity. The aim of the report based on summarizing of seven year long activity of the Commissioner is to evaluate the state of promotion and protection of human and civil rights and liberties in the country, to provide information on the analysis of the state of the important problems linked to human rights, restoration of violated rights, situation with provision of human rights protection and prevention of violations, as well as to inform about the measures and steps taken by the Commissioner for learning of the state of ensuring of human rights and liberties. As usually, the report was prepared being based on the generalized analysis of the proposals and complaints, visits of the Commissioner and the staff members of the Office to the penitentiaries, investigatory and temporary detention places (TDPs), military units, orphanages, boarding schools, camps and settlements of the refugees and internally displaced persons, healthcare and social care facilities, as well as on the cases discovered during meetings with the local population and investigations, official responses of the state bodies, officials also the information provided by mass media. The report reflects the activities of the Commissioner in the area of human rights protection, educational and awareness raising events in this field, organization of the scientific-analytical work, public relations, and issues of international cooperation.
  • State Programme on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development 2003-2005 Azerbaijan Progresses Toward the Achievement of the Mill

    State Programme on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development 2003-2005 Azerbaijan Progresses Toward the Achievement of the Mill

    STATE PROGRAMME ON POVERTY REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2003-2005 AZERBAIJAN PROGRESSES TOWARD THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS PROGRESS REPORT – 2003/2004 BAKU – 2005 DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN on Approval of the State Programme on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2003-2005 The consistent reform program carried out in the Republic of Azerbaijan in recent years has helped to ensure economic development, gradual improvement of macroeconomic performance and improvement of the living standards in the country. Thus, in the period 1996-2002, Gross Domestic Product increased by 1.7 times, capital investment increased by 7.8 times, nominal monetary income of population increased by 3 times and average monthly wages and pensions increased by 5 times. There are improvements in other economic performance indicators. However, these ongoing efforts and achievements have not yet led to a sufficiently high level of economic development and the living standards of the population have still not reached international standards: part of population is still unemployed, minimum wages are not sufficient to meet the minimum subsistence level and a number of factors causing poverty have not been eliminated. In order to further strengthen social protection of the population for the near future, ensure poverty reduction in the country and implement necessary measures to meet the commitments of the 2000 United Nations Millennium Summit, I hereby decree: 1. The “State Program on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2003-2005” shall be approved. 2. The Ministry of Economic Development of the Republic of Azerbaijan shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of measures set out in the State Program.
  • Coping Strategies of Internal Refugees in Baku, Azerbaijan a Qualitative

    Coping Strategies of Internal Refugees in Baku, Azerbaijan a Qualitative

    Coping strategies of internal refugees in Baku, Azerbaijan A qualitative field study Av Jenny Geuken LUNDS UNIVERSITY Socialhögskolan Bachelor thesis (SOPA63) VT13 Supervisor: Kristina Göransson Author: Jenny Geuken Title: Coping Strategies of internal refugees in Baku, Azerbaijan, A qualitative study Supervisor: Kristina Göransson Abstract This paper explores how internal refugees living in Baku, from the area of Nagorno-karabakh, have coped with trauma during the waiting period of returning to their home regions. Also including how they have dealt with the waiting period itself and not just their trauma. Results were reached using a qualitative research method in the form of interviewing 10 Internal refugees. The data was later analyzed through the transactional coping theory. All participants of the study used hope of returning to their home regions, helping- and talking to each other about their problems. Other coping strategies employed were patience, withdrawal, work and visiting graves. They have used both approach- and avoidant styles of coping. Avoidant styles of coping were more common in dealing with their trauma, while approach styles of coping was common in dealing with stressors of everyday life as a internal refugee. There were also differing attitudes towards the idea of receiving mental health services where the majority would not use them. Instead all internal refugees desired to return home. Key words: Trauma, IDP mental health, IDP mental healthcare, Coping strategies, dealing with trauma, Azerbaijan. Acknowledgments I want to send out a thank you to supervisors both in the field and from Lunds university. A special thanks to teachers and representatives from the azerbaijani university who helped a great deal in contacting the field and making this study possible.
  • Capacity Building and Income Generating Activities Indonesia

    Capacity Building and Income Generating Activities Indonesia

    Success Story A UNHCR Livelihoods Project Capacity building and income generating activities Indonesia LOCATION “I used the profit of my business to cover our daily life Jakarta, Cipayung-Bogor, costs… sometimes, I use my cash if my husband gets and Lombok areas of fever, influenza, or other health problems which are Indonesia not in the emergency category”. - Sandhira DURATION a refugee from Sri Lanka 3 – 5 years IMPLEMENTING OVERVIEW PARTNER Most participants of this project were refugees and asylum seekers who were stranded in Church World Service Indonesia while trying to reach another destination, usually Australia. As of December 2008, Indonesia (CWS) there were a total of 350 recognized refugees in Indonesia, 353 asylum seekers and 19 other persons of concern under temporary protection. These persons of concern had arrived from Iraq, and originated from 14 different countries. Of the recognized refugees, the three most common countries of origin were Iraq (53 percent), Sri Lanka (22 percent), and Afghanistan (11 percent). BUDGET Somalia is also a significant country of origin (14 percent of total in 2007). 2008: US $ 12,000 2009: US $ 22,500 The majority of the refugees and asylum seekers are adult males between the ages of 18 and 59, and they comprise 63 percent of all persons of concern. Adult women comprise only eight percent. These figures show that unaccompanied men (i.e. single men or those traveling without their family) make up the majority of those seeking refuge via ocean routes in the direction of Indonesia. There are also 128 youth (between 5-17 years old), some of which were born to refugees or asylum seekers in Indonesia, and 32 refugee children aged between 0-4 years.
  • After the Boats Have Stopped

    After the Boats Have Stopped

    refugee council of australia brief AFTER THE BOATS HAVE November 2018 STOPPED: Asher Hirsch Refugees stranded in Indonesia and Australia’s containment policies There are over 14,000 refugees living in limbo in Indonesia. Many came to Indonesia seeking to reach Australia or be resettled to another safe country. However, since the beginning of Australia’s Operation Sovereign Borders in 2013, and the reduction of reset- tlement options, many have found themselves stranded, without basic rights. There are few solutions for refugees in Indonesia. While refugees are able to stay on a temporary basis, Indonesia does not allow refugees to settle down and build a new life. Refugees in Indonesia are not allowed to work, have only minimal healthcare or social support, and may face arbitrary detention and destitution. Many refugees face prolonged delays as they wait for resettlement, and without any longer-term solutions on the horizon, some may feel there is no viable alternative but to return home, even where they will face danger. Every week, hundreds of refugees and asylum seekers demon- This brief provides an overview of Australia’s role in stopping ref- strate in front of the UNHCR building in Makassar, Sulawesi, de- ugees leaving Indonesia en route to Australia, and highlights the manding a fair resettlement process. Photo credit: Nicole Curby precarious situation refugees now face in Indonesia. As of September 2018, there were 13,801 refugees and people seeking asylum registered with the United Nations High Com- Refugees in Indonesia missioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Indonesia. 29% are children, 25% adult women and 52% are elderly.
  • Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and Its Alternatives

    Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and Its Alternatives

    Forced displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict: return and its alternatives August 2011 conciliation resources Place-names in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict are contested. Place-names within Nagorny Karabakh itself have been contested throughout the conflict. Place-names in the adjacent occupied territories have become increasingly contested over time in some, but not all (and not official), Armenian sources. Contributors have used their preferred terms without editorial restrictions. Variant spellings of the same name (e.g., Nagorny Karabakh vs Nagorno-Karabakh, Sumgait vs Sumqayit) have also been used in this publication according to authors’ preferences. Terminology used in the contributors’ biographies reflects their choices, not those of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. For the map at the end of the publication, Conciliation Resources has used the place-names current in 1988; where appropriate, alternative names are given in brackets in the text at first usage. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. Altered street sign in Shusha (known as Shushi to Armenians). Source: bbcrussian.com Contents Executive summary and introduction to the Karabakh Contact Group 5 The Contact Group papers 1 Return and its alternatives: international law, norms and practices, and dilemmas of ethnocratic power, implementation, justice and development 7 Gerard Toal 2 Return and its alternatives: perspectives
  • Protection Space in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines ��������������������

    Protection Space in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines

    The Search Protection Space in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines First published 2012 A PDF version of this All rigths reserved. Printed by Clung book is available at No part of this Wicha Press Co, Ltd. By JRS Asia Paci!c www.jrsap.org publication may be 43 Soi Rachwithi 12, reproduced, stored Publisher: Fr Bernard Victory Monument, Original language: in a retrieval system, Hyacinth Arputhasamy Phayathai, Bangkok English or transmitted, in any SJ 10400 Thailand form or by any means, © JRS Asia Paci!c electronic, mechanical, Designer: Molly Mullen ISBN photoopying, recording and/or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers Foreword Fr Bernard Hyacinth Arputhasamy SJ........................................................................ 1 List of terms Abbreviations used in this text............................................................................... 3 Introduction Chapter one Protection concerns............................................................................................... 9 Chapter two Chapter three Chapter four Conclusion Resources Index “When I was 3 years old, I was displaced. Now, my son is 3 years old, and he is displaced. His mother died on our journey from Sri Lanka by boat. I am doing Foreword this for his children, so they won’t have to be displaced.” – Kasun, Sri Lanka “Why would someone leave one’s own home, land, family and country to go to anoth- er?” A group of primary school students were asked during a recent trip to Australia. By Bernard Hyacinth Many enthusiastic hands were raised with answers like these: because they want to Arputhasamy, SJ run away from violence and war, it is not safe in their own country, it is dangerous and life-threatening, to seek a better life, because of poverty, there is no education and Regional Director chance to work, to start a new life, and the like.
  • International Protection Considerations Regarding Azerbaijani Asylum-Seekers and Refugees

    International Protection Considerations Regarding Azerbaijani Asylum-Seekers and Refugees

    International Protection Considerations Regarding Azerbaijani Asylum-Seekers and Refugees United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Geneva September 2003 Department of International Protection 1 Protection Information Section TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 3 II. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 3 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ON AZERBAIJAN..................................................................... 3 1.1. General Information on Nagorno-Karabakh .................................................. 9 2. THE POLITICAL CONTEXT AND ACTORS SINCE 2001................................................... 10 2.1. Referendum, August 2002 ............................................................................. 12 2.2. Presidential Elections – October 2003, Outlook .......................................... 13 2.3. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Peace Initiatives Since 1999............. 14 2.4. Regional Implications ................................................................................... 20 2.5. Internally Displaced Persons........................................................................ 21 3. REVIEW OF THE GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN AZERBAIJAN...................... 22 3.1. Freedom of Movement................................................................................... 24 3.2. Organized Crime..........................................................................................
  • [ 1993 ] Part 3 Chapter 15 Refugees and Displaced Persons

    [ 1993 ] Part 3 Chapter 15 Refugees and Displaced Persons

    Refugees and displaced persons 1071 Chapter XV Refugees and displaced persons During 1993, the world's refugee population, treatment of asylum-seekers, to uphold asylum as including internally displaced persons, increased an indispensable instrument for the international from 18.9 million to 23 million, severely taxing the protection of refugees, and to respect scrupulously capacity of the international community to the fundamental principle of non-refoulement respond. (resolution 48/116). The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) continued to deal with com- plex and protracted refugee crises through as- sistance and protection while pursuing a strategy Programme and finances of UNHCR aimed at prevention, preparedness and voluntary repatriation. Although heavily burdened by new refugee populations, UNHCR assisted some 1.8 million refugees to return home voluntarily in Programme policy 1993, at a total cost of $191 million. It endeavoured Executive Committee action. At its forty- to secure asylum for those compelled to flee and fourth session (Geneva, 4-8 October 1993),(1) the to respond rapidly to their emergency needs, com- Executive Committee of the UNHCR Programme plementing these efforts with prevention and expressed concern at the inadequacy of interna- solution-oriented activities in their countries of tional protection for various groups of refugees. origin. It noted the size and complexity of the refugee Some 469,000 Afghan refugees were repatriated problem, the risk of new refugee situations de- from Iran and Pakistan during 1993, with UNHCR veloping and challenges to refugee protection, in- assistance, and an additional 400,000 returned cluding the denial of UNHCR access to people in spontaneously.
  • Perspectives from Nagorno-Karabakh Idps" (2019)

    Perspectives from Nagorno-Karabakh Idps" (2019)

    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 6-5-2019 A State of Longing: Perspectives from Nagorno- Karabakh IDPs Isabelle McRae Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McRae, Isabelle, "A State of Longing: Perspectives from Nagorno-Karabakh IDPs" (2019). University Honors Theses. Paper 686. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.702 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. A STATE OF LONGING A State of Longing: Perspectives from Nagorno-Karabakh IDPs By Isabelle McRae An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in University Honors And International Studies Thesis Advisor Harry Anastasiou, Ph.D. Portland State University 2019 A STATE OF LONGING i Abstract Since the ceasefire in 1994, the intractable conflict of Nagorno-Karabakh continues to have a severe impact on security and development in the Caucasus region. Internally displaced Azerbaijanis (IDPs) from Nagorno-Karabakh are one of the main stakeholders in the conflict, and yet little study has addressed the impact of their symbolic values and identity issues vis-à-vis resolution efforts. Accordingly, this thesis focuses on four themes which arose in the author’s ethnographic research in Azerbaijan with internally displaced Azerbaijanis. The paper will address the group’s relation to the land, the framing of kinship and identity, relations with Armenia and the Armenian community, and perspectives on youth and trauma.
  • A Transit Country No More: Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Indonesia

    A Transit Country No More: Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Indonesia

    A Transit Country No More: Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Indonesia MMC Research Report, May 2021 Front cover photo credit: Anadolu Agency / Getty Images. Refugees in Jakarta wait to relocate by UNHCR. Acknowledgements Researched and written by: Bryony Lau About MMC The Mixed Migration Centre (MMC) is a global network Research team: Bryony Lau, Syahri Ramadhan and consisting of six regional hubs (Asia, East Africa & Yemen, Tasnim Yusuf Europe, North Africa, West Africa and Latin America & Caribbean) and a central unit in Geneva. The MMC is a Reviewed by: Jennifer Vallentine, Bram Frouws, Jane leading source of independent and high-quality data, Linekar, Hanh Nguyen and Abdullah Mohammadi research, analysis and expertise on mixed migration. The MMC aims to increase understanding of mixed migration, Editing: Anthony Morland to positively impact global and regional migration policies, to inform evidence-based protection responses Layout and design: Simon Pegler with map design by for people on the move and to stimulate forward thinking Ashok Rai in public and policy debates on mixed migration. The MMC’s overarching focus is on human rights and Special thanks: protection for all people on the move. All 4Mi, online survey and key informant respondents for sharing their time and perspective; UNHCR Indonesia, The MMC is part of, and governed by, the Danish Refugee IOM Indonesia and the International Detention Coalition Council (DRC). While its institutional link to DRC ensures for their input and review. MMC’s work is grounded in operational reality, it acts as an independent source of data, research, analysis and This study was implemented with funding from DANIDA.