DOCSLIB.ORG

Charles Lyell and Gideon Mantell, 1821-1852: Their Quest for Elite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charles Lyell and Gideon Mantell, 1821-1852: Their Quest for Elite CHAPTER FOUR SOCIAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE GEOLOGICAL CAREERS OF LYELL AND MANTELL The most striking social difference between Lyell and Mantell, or for that matter, between the ‘gentleman-specialists’ and Mantell, concerns their respective family backgrounds. In Mantell’s case, the fact that his father was a provincial shoe-maker, with dissenting religious beliefs and radical political views, resulted in Mantell having a markedly different social status from Lyell, and as a consequence, much more restricted educational and occupational opportunities. In this chapter the extent to which these factors proved to be a handicap to Mantell’s geological career are explored. Other social factors are also examined. These include patronage, the advantages of having an established network of influential friends and contacts, the resolution of career-choice clashes, fashioning a socially acceptable occupation in the world of gentlemanly geology, the importance of a supportive spouse and the income requirements for the lifestyle of a gentleman-specialist. In addition, personal qualities and factors such as ambition, diligence, and health problems are taken into account. The main emphasis in this chapter focuses on Mantell, since his case history epitomises that of an ‘outsider’, in contrast to the more orthodox case of Lyell. Nevertheless, Lyell also faced some career obstacles, which further illustrate aspects of early nineteenth-century geological life. 4.1 LITERATURE REVIEW The literature reviewed in this chapter falls into two broad categories: first, biographical material concerning Lyell and Mantell, and second, studies pertaining to scientific patronage, provincialism, occupational opportunities in natural history, and living standards, costs, and incomes. Most of these issues are interlinked, and in a broad sense the various factors reviewed focus on the question of how could a gentleman, or more pertinently, an ambitious person with gentlemanly pretensions, establish the necessary base 175 to achieve elite status in natural history during the first half of the nineteenth century. In this regard both Lyell and Mantell provide complementary and contrasting case histories. 4.1.1 LYELL AND MANTELL The review of biographical data on Lyell and Mantell has been restricted to material examining or raising relevant social factors that affected the geological careers of the two men. For this reason most of the pre-1970 biographies are not discussed,1 but use is made of his Life and Letters. (1) LYELL One of the earliest and most important sources of information on Lyell is Life, Letters and Journals of Sir Charles Lyell,2 edited by his sister-in-law, Katherine M. Lyell, and published in 1881. Extracts from these two volumes, which are typical of this late Victorian biographical genre, have been cited frequently in the literature on Lyell’s work and the history of English geology.3 They provide useful insights into Lyell’s boyhood,4 his close family relationships, the high opinion he held of Mantell in the 1830s,5 his social milieu, his determination to establish a successful career in geology, and to his apparent indifference to money. The relative importance of Lyell’s letters to Mantell in these two volumes is indicated below. 1 Examples in this category include:iA. Geikie, The Founders of Geology, J. Murray, London, 1897;iH.B. Woodward, History of Geology, Watts and Co., London, 1911; iE.B. Bailey, Charles Lyell, Doubleday, New York, 1962. 2 K.M. Lyell (ed.), Life, Letters and Journals of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart. author of ‘Principles of Geology &c’, 2 vols, J. Murray, London, 1881. 3 Extracts from these volumes are cited, for example, in:iJ.B. Morrell, ‘London Institutions and Lyell's Career: 1820-41’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 1976, 32, pp. 132- 146;iN.A. Rupke, The Great Chain of History. William Buckland and the English School of Geology (1814-1849), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983, pp. 72, 88, and 246;iM.J.S. Rudwick, The Great Devonian Controversy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985, pp. 73, 75, and 380. 4 The first 31 pages of Volume 1 contains an autobiographical sketch of Lyell’s life until he entered Oxford at the age of 17 years. It was written in 1831-32 for the information of his fiancee, Mary Elizabeth Horner, who was then living in Bonn, Germany. As such, it has inherent limitations, but it does give a picture of a pleasurable, uncomplicated and privileged childhood. 5 K.M. Lyell, op. cit. (note 2), vol. 1, p. 377 and pp. 444-446. 176 Quoted Recipients of Lyell’s Letters Number of Letters Quoted Lyell’s sisters and mother 68 Charles Lyell Senior 49 L. Horner 42 G.A. Mantell 36 C. Bunbury 27 G. Tichnor 27 J. Fleming 15 C. Darwin 14 R.I. Murchison 7 A. Sedgwick 5 Since Horner was Lyell’s father-in-law, and Bunbury his wife’s brother-in- law, the quoted letters from Lyell to Mantell comprise the highest number written to any English geologist outside Lyell’s extended family. Additionally, these two volumes are interesting because of the nature of a number of subtle deletions and exclusions that Katherine Lyell made to some of the letters from Lyell to Mantell. These omissions have been identified by comparing the text of Lyell’s original letters with the 36 extracts quoted in the two volumes. For the most part the excisions made by Katherine Lyell relate to late nineteenth-century social conventions and to the impropriety of discussing financial matters, family incomes, and disparaging remarks concerning certain institutions and individuals. There are also strong indications of the editor deliberately fashioning and enhancing a favourable image of her brother-in-law. Lyell’s attitude to money is portrayed as that of the gentleman, relatively unconcerned with financial matters, as indicated in this extract from a letter to his father, dated 10 April 1827: I am quite clear, from all that I have seen of the world, that there is most real independence in that class of society who, possessing moderate means, are engaged in literary and scientific hobbies; and that in ascending from them upwards, the feeling of independence decreases pretty nearly in the same ratio as the fortunes increase.6 6 CL to CL Senior, 10 April 1827. Quoted in K.M. Lyell, op. cit. (note 2), vol. 1, pp. 170-171. 177 Lyell’s seeming offhand attitude to money is further illustrated in his letter to Murchison, 21 months later, following their joint expedition to Sicily: I shall never hope to make money by geology, but not to lose, and tax others for my amusement; and unless I can secure this, it would in my circumstances be selfish in me to devote myself as much as I hope to do to it.7 However, these and other quoted extracts from Lyell’s correspondence and journals do not provide an altogether balanced assessment of Lyell’s attitude to financial matters. A reading of all of Lyell’s 232 letters to Mantell indicates that Lyell was financially shrewd and worldly, and well aware of the importance of money. Under Katherine Lyell’s editorship, omissions range from a single key word to an entire significant letter, in order to enhance and consolidate a desired image. For example, in his letters to Mantell dated 14 June 1832 and 30 April 1833, Lyell made the following respective comments on his lectures at King’s College, London, and at the Royal Institution: My lectures were splendidly attended. [(chiefly by persons who honoured me) to the last. As yet, far less profitable for purse, & surely for solid fame than writing. But I won’t be hasty.]8 and My introductory lecture at Royal Institn. last Thursdy was attended by 250 persons, [95 of them proprietors who pay nothing.]9 The words in square parentheses in each of these quoted extracts, and which relate to Lyell’s income, were omitted from K. Lyell’s volumes.10 Other topics that were subject to editorial deletion concerned adverse references to the Established Church, particular individuals, and even the names of specific authors. In a letter to Mantell describing Buckland’s recent appointment as Canon at Christ Church, Lyell commented: 7 CL to R.I. Murchison, 15 January 1829, quoted in ibid., vol.1, p. 234. 8 CL to GAM, 14 June 1832, Mantell mss, ATL-NZ, Folder 63. (Supp. Vol.-Letter 92). 9 CL to GAM, 30 April 1833, Mantell mss, ATL-NZ, Folder 63. (Supp.Vol.-Letter 100). 10 K.M. Lyell, op. cit. (note 2), vol. 1, pp. 388 and 395 respectively. 178 The Canon has a glorious house & [but for the daily everlasting chapel going & long chants] is admirably set down for himself and geology.11 Again, the words in parentheses were omitted12 in this quoted letter in Life, Letters and Journals of Sir Charles Lyell. The socially disparaging term ‘tradesman’ was excised in a reference to the London publisher, John Murray,13 and in the same letter the following sentence was also excised: Featherstonaugh has made an ass of himself by a poem on the deluge which is despicable low and vulgar to a degree that would disgust you.14 Another exclusion concerns Katherine Lyell’s suppression of references to George Toulmin,15 whose name was purposely left blank in an important quoted extract from Lyell’s letter to Mantell dated 29 December 1827:16 I marvel less at Dr Toulmin anticipations ( as I supposed them ) in Geol.l speculations now that I observe he followed Hutton & cites him. I think he ran unnecessarily counter to the feelings & prejudices of the age.17 In a follow-up letter Lyell wrote on 5 February 1828, Katherine Lyell deleted the following sentence:18 I will send Toulmin very soon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Formal and Informal Networks of Knowledge and Etheldred Benett's
    Journal of Literature and Science Volume 8, No. 1 (2015) ISSN 1754-646X Susan Pickford, “Social Authorship, Networks of Knowledge”: 69-85 “I have no pleasure in collecting for myself alone”:1 Social Authorship, Networks of Knowledge and Etheldred Benett’s Catalogue of the Organic Remains of the County of Wiltshire (1831) Susan Pickford As with many other fields of scientific endeavour, the relationship between literature and geology has proved a fruitful arena for research in recent years. Much of this research has focused on the founding decades of the earth sciences in the early- to mid-nineteenth century, with recent articles by Gowan Dawson and Laurence Talairach-Vielmas joining works such as Noah Heringman’s Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology (2003), Ralph O’Connor’s The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802-1856 (2007), Virginia Zimmerman’s Excavating Victorians (2008) and Adelene Buckland’s Novel Science: Fiction and the Invention of Nineteenth-Century Geology (2013), to explore the rhetorical and narrative strategies of writings in the early earth sciences. It has long been noted that the most institutionally influential early geologists formed a cohort of eager young men who, having no tangible interests in the economic and practical applications of their chosen field, were in a position to develop a passionately Romantic engagement with nature, espousing an apocalyptic rhetoric of catastrophes past and borrowing epic imagery from Milton and Dante (Buckland 9, 14-15). However, as Buckland further notes, this argument – though persuasive as far as it goes – fails to take into account the broad social range of participants in the construction of early geological knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Graphic Innovations of Geologist Henry T
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Uncovering strata: an investigation into the graphic innovations of geologist Henry T. De la Beche Renee M. Clary Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Clary, Renee M., "Uncovering strata: an investigation into the graphic innovations of geologist Henry T. De la Beche" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 127. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/127 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. UNCOVERING STRATA: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE GRAPHIC INNOVATIONS OF GEOLOGIST HENRY T. DE LA BECHE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Curriculum and Instruction by Renee M. Clary B.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1983 M.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1997 M.Ed., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1998 May 2003 Copyright 2003 Renee M. Clary All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments Photographs of the archived documents held in the National Museum of Wales are provided by the museum, and are reproduced with permission. I send a sincere thank you to Mr. Tom Sharpe, Curator, who offered his time and assistance during the research trip to Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • MG17 3 2010 Complete.Pdf 16363KB 26 May 2018
    MERCIAN Geologist VOLUME 17 PART 3 AUGUST 2010 East Midlands Geological Society Contents President Vice-President Mercian News 142 Tim Colman John Travis Geobrowser 143 The Record 146 Secretary Treasurer From the Archives 147 Janet Slatter Colin Bagshaw David G. Bate 149 Editorial Board Sir Henry Thomas de la Beche Tony Waltham Andy Howard and the founding of the British Geological Survey John Carney Tony Morris John N. Carney 166 Alan Filmer Gerry Slavin Magma mixing in the South Leicestershire Diorite: Council evidence from an Ordovician pluton at Croft Quarry Keith Ambrose Duncan Short Tim Colman 173 David Bate Gerry Slavin Gold in Britain: past , present and future Paul Guion Ian Sutton Stephen Gurney, Timothy Astin, Geoffrey Griffi ths 181 Richard Hamblin Neil Turner Origin and structure of Devensian depressions Sue Miles Geoff Warrington at Letton, Herefordshire Gerry Shaw Albert Horton 185 Correspondence Building stones of St Mary’s Church Society Secretary, 100 Main Street, at Colston Bassett, Nottinghamshire Long Whatton, Loughborough LE12 5DG Helen Boynton and Trevor Ford 195 01509 843297 [email protected] William W. Watts, pioneer Midlands geologist Mercian Geologist Editor, Reports 11 Selby Road, Nottingham NG2 7BP 0115 981 3833 [email protected] Members’ Evening, 2010: Shetland: John Aram 203 Mercian Geologist is printed by John Browns; Golcona Mine: John Jones 205 and published by the East Midlands Geological Society. James Hutton: Gerard Slavin, Gerry Shaw, Brenda Slavin 207 No part of this publication may be reproduced in printed or electronic form without prior consent of the Society. Charnian fossils: Helen Boynton 210 ISSN 0025 990X Wave Rock, Australia: Alan Filmer 211 © 2010 East Midlands Geological Society Registered Charity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Case Study 25
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Brief Description of item(s) 294 manuscript notebooks of the geologist Sir Charles Lyell (1797-1875). In two series: 263 numbered notebooks, 1825-1874, on geology, natural history, social and political subjects; 31 additional notebooks, 1818-1871, with indices. Mostly octavo format. For details see Appendix 1. In good condition. 2. Context The nineteenth century saw public debate about how to conduct science reach new heights. Charles Lyell was a pivotal figure in the establishment of geology as a scientific discipline; he also transformed ideas about the relationship between human history and the history of the earth. Above all, he revealed the significance of ‘deep time’. At a time when the Anglican church dominated intellectual culture, geology was a controversial subject. Lyell played a significant part in separating the practice of science from that of religion. Through his major work, The Principles of Geology, he developed the method later adopted by Darwin for his studies into evolution. Lyell observed natural phenomena at first hand to infer their underlying causes, which he used to interpret the phenomena of the past. The method stressed not only a vast geological timescale, but also the ability of small changes to produce, eventually, large ones. The Principles combined natural history, theology, political economy, anthropology, travel, and geography. It was an immediate success, in Britain, Europe, North America and Australia. Scientists, theologians, leading authors, explorers, artists, and an increasingly educated public read and discussed it. Lyell’s inductive method strongly influenced the generation of naturalists after Darwin. Over the rest of his life, Lyell revised the Principles in the light of new research and his own changing ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted Thesis (PDF, 12Mb)
    Victorian Egyptology and the Making of a Colonial Field Science, 1850 – 1906 by Meira Gold Wolfson College Department of History and Philosophy of Science This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date of Submission: December 2019 Declaration This thesis is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my thesis has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the History and Philosophy of Science Degree Committee. Abstract Victorian Egyptology and the Making of a Colonial Field Science, 1850-1906 Meira Gold This dissertation provides a new account of the origins of archaeological fieldwork in the Nile Delta. It considers how practitioners from diverse disciplinary backgrounds circulated knowledge about the built environment of pharaonic ruins: monuments, architecture, burials, and soil mounds that remained in situ. I trace the development of Egyptology from an activity that could be practiced long-distance through a network of informants to one that required first-hand field experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the History of Geology Group of the Geological Society
    HOGG Newsletter of the History of Geology Group of The Geological Society Number 68 February 2020 Front cover WILLIAM AUGUSTUS EDMOND USSHER (1849‒1920), the centenary of whose death is remembered this year. Born in County Galway, Ireland in 1849, Ussher joined the Geological Survey of Great Britain (now British Geological Survey) in 1868 and spent his whole career (retiring in 1909) as a field and mapping surveyor. He is best known for his work in the south-west of England (Cornwall, Devon, Somerset), particularly his work on the Devonian, Carboniferous and Triassic strata. In 1894, he was awarded the Geological Society’s Murchison Medal. Many Survey maps and memoirs bear his name as does the Ussher Society founded in 1962 as a focus for geological research in south-west England. Originally published under the title Proceedings of the Ussher Society, its journal was renamed Geoscience in South-West England in 1998. Sources Anon. 1920. Obituary of Mr W. A. E. Ussher. Nature, 105, 144. Anon [R. D. Oldham] 1921. Obituary Proceedings of the Geological Society in Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 77, lxxiii‒lxxiv. British Geological Survey. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discoveringGeology/geologyOfBritain/archives/pioneers/pioneers.cfc?method=search &currentTab=tab_U Burt, E. 2013. W. A. E. Ussher: an insight into his life and character. Geoscience in South-West England, 13, 165‒171. Dineley, D. L. 1974. W. A. E. Ussher: his work in the south-west. Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 3, 189‒201. House, M. R. 1978. W. A. E. Ussher: his ancestral background. Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 4, 115‒118.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of Geological Mapping in England
    The beginning of geological mapping in England John Henry The speaker has spent his professional life producing engineering geological maps from air photographs and satellite images for large construction projects. Although we take geological maps for granted now, supported by air photography, GPS, geophysics, frequent borehole cores and rapid communication, the first geologists did not have these advantages. Accurate maps produced by the OS were fundamental to the development of geology. De la Beche commented that finding a good base map was the first essential and such maps were very rare. Martin Lister (1630-1712) proposed to the Royal Society the production of a new map with legends showing sands and clays etc in a soil or minerals map in order to understand more as knowing soils at outcrop points to what is beneath. Christopher Packe (1686-1749) produced A new philosophico- chorographical chart of east Kent in 1743, the first geomorphological map, which showed the distribution of chalk, gravel and clay pits and soils at a scale of 1¼ miles to the inch. These iniatives led nowhere at the time. In the British Isles, geological mapping began with William Smith (1769-1839). His career began when he was apprenticed to a surveyor. His first solo job, in 1792-93 in Wiltshire, was to produce the High Littleton Estate map with detail of the villages. He was tasked to go down mines and measure sections. In the course of this work, he noticed differences in the fossils in different strata and that they were always in the same sequence in different shafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Humphry Davy, Mining and the Sublime Landscapes of Cornwall
    Journal of Literature and Science Volume 7, No. 1 (2014) ISSN 1754-646XJournal of Literature and Science 7 (2014) Trower, “Primitive Rocks”: 20-40 Shelley Trower, “Primitive Rocks”: 20-40 Primitive Rocks: Humphry Davy, Mining and the Sublime Landscapes of Cornwall Shelley Trower The newly established Geological Society of London, formed in 1807, set out as a primary purpose its ambition to produce a geological map of Britain. The editors of the first issue of the Society’s journal, Transactions of the Geological Society (1811), stated their hope that its members will continue to donate mineral specimens which will lay the foundations of such a map (“Preface” viii). A few years later, in 1814, a similar society was formed in Cornwall which then produced its own journal, Transactions of the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall (1818), the first issue of which echoed the London version of Transactions, though on a smaller scale: “In the construction of a geological map of Cornwall, the Society has made considerable progress, and the Council trust that from the zealous and united exertion of its members, its completion may be confidently anticipated” (“Preface” viii). At this point the president of the London Society, George Bellas Greenough, was about to publish his Geological Map of England and Wales (1819), the result of a cooperative collaboration between the society’s members who sent in rock specimens from various localities throughout much of Britain. What such maps clearly highlighted were regional differences in geology, differences which formed a basis for understanding how particular regions were not only comprised of certain kinds of rocks but also exhibited other properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Horner: a Portrait of an Inspector of Factories
    BERNICE MARTIN LEONARD HORNER: A PORTRAIT OF AN INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES Leonard Horner was the most impressive and influential of the first English factory inspectors. For 26 years from 1833 to 1859 he adminis- tered the Factory Act mainly in the textile district of Lancashire. His work and that of his colleagues in the Factory Department made a success of this major experiment in legislative intervention in industry and despite the gloomy predictions of their early opponents they did not ruin the British economy in the process. The first generation of Inspectors laid the foundation for successive extensions of the Factory Act so that by the end of the 19th century working conditions and hours of labour for women and children were under legal regulation in all the major branches of manufacturing industry. Horner was ac- knowledged by his contemporaries to be the major figure among the early Inspectors; he even had the singular honour of being praised by Marx in Capital. This short biography will concentrate on Horner's work as Inspector of Factories since this is undoubtedly his major achievement. However it will also be concerned with other aspects of his life and interests, both because these have some importance in their own right and also in order to examine the extent to which Horner's life and thought form a coherent whole. Finally, an assessment will be made of Horner's place in social reform and in the development of English economic and social policy in the 19th century. I HORNER'S EARLY LIFE AND CAREER1 Leonard Horner was born in Edinburgh in 1785.
    [Show full text]
  • HOGG Bulletin No 1.Pdf
    HOGG Bulletin No 1 February 2021 https://historyofgeologygroup.co.uk Twitter @HOGGroup [email protected] Dear Readers, This is the first of a new style of emailed Bulletin to be sent to HOGG members and associates to provide up-to-date news of current and forthcoming events of interest to historians of geology. By issuing these Bulletins at approximately six-weekly intervals it is hoped to provide such news in a timelier manner than was possible under previous arrangements. If you have news of events that should be included in the next Bulletin (mid-March), please send to [email protected] by 10th March. The format of the Bulletin will be simple: 1. Notifications 2. Forthcoming Events 3. Recent Publications 4. A.O.B. 1. Notifications The HOGG Newsletter The Newsletter itself will now be published just twice a year, in April and October. It will be printed, and the first edition will be sent to all HOGG members in April. It is hoped that the Newsletter will quickly develop to include more member-led content, with short papers, news of current research, essays and articles as well as reports of meetings, book reviews etc. as before. At present there is no forum for such things. Short of the fully peer-reviewed journal there is no way for shorter pieces of work or news of on-going research – or simply enthusiastic musings – to be shared with those of a like mind. It is hoped that the HOGG Newsletter might fill that gap and might, in time, encourage others to join the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR PEOPLE WHO LOVE MAPS JOURNAL of the INTERNATIONAL MAP COLLECTORS’ SOCIETY JUNE 2019 No.157 ISSN 0956-5728
    157 INTERNATIONAL MAP COLLECTORS’ SOCIETY JUNE 2019 No.157 FOR PEOPLE WHO LOVE MAPS JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL MAP COLLECTORS’ SOCIETY JUNE 2019 No.157 ISSN 0956-5728 ARTICLES John Phillips (1800–1874): The introduction of lithography in geological mapmaking in Great Britain 10 John Henry Mapping Nauru: A microcosm of imperialism 28 Alice Tonkinson and Robert Clancy REGULAR ITEMS A Letter from the Chairman 3 Editorial 5 New Members 5 IMCoS Matters 6 ICHC 2019, Amsterdam IMCoS September trip to Oxford Mapping Matters 40 Cartography Calendar 46 Exhibition Review: Imaginary Cities 48 Book Reviews 51 Shanghai chengshi ditu jicheng 上海城市地图集成 (Complete atlas of Shanghai antiquated maps) ed. by Sun Xun 孙逊 and Zhong Chong Scotland Defending the Nation, Mapping the Military Landscape by Carolyn Anderson and Christopher Fleet The Diaries of William Lloyd Holden, 1829 and 1830 ed. by Jonathan Pepler Atlas – A World of Maps From the British Library by Tom Harper Library Book Sale 61 Copy and other material for future issues should be submitted to: Editor Ljiljana Ortolja-Baird, Email [email protected] 14 Hallfield, Quendon, Essex CB11 3XY United Kingdom Consultant Editor Valerie Newby Designer Bobby Birchall Advertising Manager Jenny Harvey, 27 Landford Road, Putney, London SW15 1AQ United Kingdom, Tel +44 (0)20 8789 7358, Email [email protected] Front cover Detail of ‘Geological Please note that acceptance of an article for publication gives IMCoS the right to place it on our Map of the E. Part of Yorkshire’ by website and social media. Articles must not be reproduced without the written consent of the author John Phillips published in Part I of and the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Horner in Bonn and Liu Tungsheng in Beijing Tic
    Open Geosci. 2018; 10:925–931 Research Article Ian Smalley* and Slobodan B. Markovic An enthusiasm for loess: Leonard Horner in Bonn and Liu Tungsheng in Beijing https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0073 tic. Liu followed determinedly in these footsteps; a great Received Jan 10, 2018; accepted Dec 18, 2018 scholar, and a great enthusiast. Loess scholarship needs careful and precise investigation Abstract: Liu Tungsheng featured on the list of twelve no- and reporting but it also needs a broad sweep of enthusi- table loess investigators prepared for the great LoessFest asm, an appreciation of loess for the extraordinary mate- meeting, held in Heidelberg and Bonn in 1999. He fully de- rial that it is. served his position on this list of eminent loess scholars; in fact it might be argued that his was the major contri- Keywords: Loess, loess investigation, loess enthusiasm, bution. His contribution was a true paradigm shift in the Leonard Horner, Liu Tungsheng world of loess investigation. Obruchev and Richthofen had produced an earlier paradigm shift when they propagated the idea that loess deposits form by aeolian deposition- a “The thick silt sediment in North China deposited by the wind paradigm shift away from the earlier Lyellian idea of la- during the dry period of the Quaternary period is unique in many custrine or fluvial deposition. But that was a fairly simple aspects. Its great thickness, wide distribution, complex develop- ment history, rich fossil contents and the characteristic topogra- shift, a tweak of the sedimentological event structure. Liu, phy it shows make it unequalled as compared with the loess de- and his co-workers in China, produced a new vision, a new posits in other parts of the world.” way of looking at loess, not so much a paradigm shift as a Liu & Chang 1964 p.523 [12] paradigm enlargement.
    [Show full text]