DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Guide to Legal Citation V4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Australian Guide to Legal Citation V4 4 Australian Guide to Legal Citation Fourth Edition USTRALIAN UIDE A G TO LEGAL CITATION Fourth Edition Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Melbourne 2018 Published and distributed by the Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with the Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Australian Guide to Legal Citation / Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc., Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc. 4th ed. ISBN 9780646976389. Bibliography. Includes index. Citation of legal authorities - Australia - Handbooks, manuals, etc. 808.06634 First edition 1998 Second edition 2002 Third edition 2010, 2011 (with minor corrections), 2012 (with minor corrections) Published by: Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc Reg No A0017345F · ABN 21 447 204 764 Melbourne University Law Review Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 6593 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 9347 8087 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Website: <http://www.mulr.unimelb.edu.au> Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Reg No A0046334D · ABN 86 930 725 641 Melbourne Journal of International Law Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 7913 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 8344 9774 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Website: <http://www.mjil.unimelb.edu.au> © 2018 Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc and Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc. This work is protected by the laws of copyright. Except for any uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) or equivalent overseas legislation, no part of this work may be reproduced, in any manner or in any medium, without the written permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION Fourth Edition MELBOURNE UNIVERSITY LAWREVIEW Melbourne University Law Review Melbourne Journal of International Association Inc Law Inc © 2018 The Melbourne University Law Review Association and the Melbourne Journal of International Law gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the sponsors of the fourth edition of the Australian Guide to Legal Citation. v Foreword to the Fourth Edition Citation of sources has long been a defining feature of academic scholarship. Even the most original thinker will have derived inspiration from the writings of others, and it is only proper that that debt be acknowledged. Citation also contributes to the history of ideas, by marking out the pathways of intellectual development. Citation of sources in judgments is, by comparison, a relatively recent phenomenon. In the High Court, for example, the number of citations per case increased tenfold between 1920 and 1996, from 23 to 240.1 In part, of course, this increase reflects the growth in the length of judgments. But it is also to be explained by the evolution of paper-based argument, the much greater accessibility of judgments and academic articles, and the availability of sophisticated search engines.2 Proper citation serves important rule of law purposes. Reference to authorities which govern, or guide, decision-making ensures that the judicial process ‘is injected with a certain degree of consistency, predictability and coherence’.3 Citation makes a judge’s reasons more comprehensible, and the process of adjudication more transparent, by exposing not only the path of reasoning but its foundations. Citation also enhances the development of legal principle. Footnotes are a rich resource for practitioners confronted with the same or a related question, and for academics seeking to elucidate the principles which inform judicial decisions and to identify and explain doctrinal developments. All of which makes the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (‘Guide’) an indispensable resource. The Guide has given us a national language of citation, which enhances communication across the legal system. And it epitomises the commitment to precision and consistency on which accurate citation depends. The Honourable Justice Chris Maxwell AC President of the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria November 2017 __________ 1 Russell Smyth, ‘Citations by Court’ in Tony Blackshield, Michael Coper and George Williams (eds), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (Oxford University Press, 2001) 98, 98. 2 Dietrich Fausten, Ingrid Nielsen and Russell Smyth, ‘A Century of Citation Practice on the Supreme Court of Victoria’ (2007) 31(3) Melbourne University Law Review 733, 801. 3 Russell Smyth, ‘What Do Judges Cite? An Empirical Study of the “Authority of Authority” in the Supreme Court of Victoria’ (1999) 25(1) Monash University Law Review 29, 32. vi Foreword to the Third Edition The third edition of the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (‘Guide’) deserves celebration. The Guide is the successor to the Melbourne University Law Review Style Guide, the bane and vade mecum of student editors for many years. The first edition of the Guide appeared in 1998 and the second in 2002. This third edition is considerably longer and more detailed than its predecessors, offering guidance on the citation of new sources of law. Until I worked on the Melbourne University Law Review as a student in the 1970s, I was oblivious to the delights, agonies and obsessions of editorial style and citation methods. That experience imparted enduring respect for well-tempered punctuation as well as accurate and judicious footnoting. It is easy to dismiss rules of punctuation and legal citation as the province of pedants and to imply that attention to such matters privileges style over substance. Punctuation, however, can be critical to meaning and clarity. Lynne Truss acknowledges this significance in her charming meditation on punctuation, Eats, Shoots and Leaves, which she dedicates: To the memory of the striking Bolshevik printers of St Petersburg who, in 1905, demanded to be paid the same rate for punctuation marks as for letters, and thereby directly precipitated the first Russian Revolution.1 As for citation, scholars have a responsibility to acknowledge the sources of their information and ideas carefully so that they can be readily traced by their readers. In this sense, citation practices are akin to musical scales — technical exercises that ground scholarly sonatas. The third edition expands and updates earlier versions of the Guide. Now legal scholars have a stern but reliable guide to the vexing issue of the use of ellipses in quotations, or the citation of parties’ submissions in court cases. The distinction between em- and en- dashes is helpfully explicated. One particularly welcome change from earlier editions is the inclusion of examples for almost all rules. The third edition also contains a number of tables that present complex rules in a simple and accessible manner. __________ 1 Lynne Truss, Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation (Profile Books, 2003) v. vii This volume mirrors the increasing significance of both comparative and international law in Australian legal scholarship. The earlier single chapter on the citation of international materials has now become seven chapters. The international section (Part IV) devotes considerable attention to treaties and the documents generated by international institutions. It includes an entirely new chapter on the citation of documents from international criminal tribunals, reflecting the astonishing growth in the law in this area over the past decade. Part V introduces rules for citing legal materials from China, France, Germany, Malaysia, Singapore and South Africa and contains extensive revisions of rules relating to the United Kingdom and the United States. Such guidelines will enhance the accessibility of foreign legal sources and thus gently erode Australian legal parochialism. The third edition is the product of intense and detailed work. It is meticulous without being stultifying. The authors are respectful sticklers working on behalf of readers everywhere and all Australian legal scholars will benefit from the careful scrutiny and sensibility of the three generations of the Guide’s authors. Sticklers unite! Like the printers of St Petersburg, the authors of this Guide take the conventions of language and research seriously. May this compendium repay their hard work by encouraging precision in prose and clarity in citation. Hilary Charlesworth Professor of Law and ARC Federation Fellow The Australian National University Melbourne University Law Review Editor 1979 January 2010 viii Foreword to the First Edition Many publishers and some publications have their own Style Guides. For years, the editors of the Melbourne University Law Review referred to the Style Guide published by the Review’s constituent body to solve problems of how to cite materials referred to in the articles and notes appearing in each issue. Now the Melbourne University Law Review Association has produced an Australian Guide to Legal Citation. The project is ambitious. As its Preface says, the Guide ‘attempts to set down and clarify citation customs where they exist, and to determine the best practice where no particular custom has been established’. In so doing the Association seeks to emulate other, long established and authoritative citation guides published by university law reviews. Of these, the ‘Bluebook’ is, perhaps, the best known. Published by a group of law reviews led by the Harvard Law Review, The Bluebook:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Essay Open Chambers: High Court Associates and Supreme Court Clerks Compared
    REVIEW ESSAY OPEN CHAMBERS: HIGH COURT ASSOCIATES AND SUPREME COURT CLERKS COMPARED KATHARINE G YOUNG∗ Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court by Artemus Ward and David L Weiden (New York: New York University Press, 2006) pages i–xiv, 1–358. Price A$65.00 (hardcover). ISBN 0 8147 9404 1. I They have been variously described as ‘junior justices’, ‘para-judges’, ‘pup- peteers’, ‘courtiers’, ‘ghost-writers’, ‘knuckleheads’ and ‘little beasts’. In a recent study of the role of law clerks in the United States Supreme Court, political scientists Artemus Ward and David L Weiden settle on a new metaphor. In Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court, the authors borrow from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s famous poem to describe the transformation of the institution of the law clerk over the course of a century, from benign pupilage to ‘a permanent bureaucracy of influential legal decision-makers’.1 The rise of the institution has in turn transformed the Court itself. Nonetheless, despite the extravagant metaphor, the authors do not set out to provide a new exposé on the internal politics of the Supreme Court or to unveil the clerks (or their justices) as errant magicians.2 Unlike Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s The Brethren3 and Edward Lazarus’ Closed Chambers,4 Sorcerers’ Apprentices is not pitched to the public’s right to know (or its desire ∗ BA, LLB (Hons) (Melb), LLM Program (Harv); SJD Candidate and Clark Byse Teaching Fellow, Harvard Law School; Associate to Justice Michael Kirby AC CMG, High Court of Aus- tralia, 2001–02.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Guide
    Research Guide FINDING CASES I. HOW TO FIND A CASE WHEN YOU KNOW THE CITATION A. DECIPHERING LEGAL CITATIONS 1. CASE CITATIONS A case citation includes: the names of the parties, the volume number of the case reporter, the abbreviated name of the reporter, the page number where the case can be found, and the year of the decision. EXAMPLE: Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta, 30 Cal.3d 800 (1982). Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta = names of the parties 30 = volume number of the case reporter Cal. = abbreviated name of the case reporter, California Reports 3d = series number of the case reporter, California Reports 800 = page number of the case reporter (1982) = year of the decision 2. ABBREVIATIONS OF REPORTER NAMES The abbreviations used in citations can be deciphered by consulting: a. Prince’s Bieber Dictionary of Legal Abbreviations, 6th ed. (Ref. KF 246 .p74 2009) b. Black's Law Dictionary (Ref. KF 156 .B624 2009). This legal dictionary contains a table of abbreviations. Copies of Black's are located on dictionary stands throughout the library, as well as in the Reference Collection. 3. REPORTERS AND PARALLEL CITATIONS A case may be published in more than one reporter. Parallel citations indicate the different reporters publishing the same case. EXAMPLE: Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta, 30 Cal.3d 800, 180 Cal. Rptr. 628, 640 P.2d 764 (1982). 02/08/12 (Rev.) RG14 (OVER) This case will be found in three places: the "official" California Reports 3d (30 Cal. 3rd 800); and the two "unofficial" West reporters: the California Reporter (180 Cal.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 0 APR 2018 and STATE of VICTORIA the REGISTRY BRISBANE Plaintiff 10 ANNOTATED SUBMISSIONS for the ATTORNEY-GENERAL for the STATE of QUEENSLAND (INTERVENING)
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA No. M2 of2017 MELBOURNEREG~IS~T~R~Y--~~~~~~~ BETWEEN: HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA CRAIG WILLIAM JOHN MINOGUE FILED Plaintiff 3 0 APR 2018 AND STATE OF VICTORIA THE REGISTRY BRISBANE Plaintiff 10 ANNOTATED SUBMISSIONS FOR THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (INTERVENING) PART I: Internet publication I. These submissions are in a form suitable for publication on the Internet. PART 11: Basis of intervention 2. The Attorney-General for the State of Queensland ('Queensland') intervenes in these 20 proceedings in support of the defendant pursuant to s 78A of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). PART Ill: Reasons why leave to intervene should be granted 3. Not applicable. PART IV: Submissions 30 Summary 4. Queensland's written submissions are confined to addressing the novel arguments of the plaintiff directed to constitutionalising his particular conception of the rule of law. The plaintiff submits that if ss 74AAA and 127A ofthe Corrections Act 1986 (Vie) apply to his parole application then they operate retrospectively and that such retrospectivity is inconsistent with the constitutional assumptions of the rule of law and therefore 40 invalid. 1 1 Plaintiffs submissions, 2 [4](c), 19 [68]; (SCB 84(36), 85(37)(c)). Intervener's submissions Mr GR Cooper Filed on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State CROWN SOLICITOR of Queensland (Intervening) 11th Floor, State Law Building Form 27c 50 Ann Street, Brisbane 4000 Dated: 30 April2018 Per Kent Blore Telephone 07 3239 3734 Ref PL8/ATT110/3710/BKE Facsimile 07 3239 6382 Document No: 7880475 5. Queensland's primary submission is that ss 74AAA and 127 A ofthe Corrections Act do not operate retrospectively as they merely prescribe criteria for the Board to apply in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Guide to Legal Citation, Third Edition
    AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL AUSTRALIAN CITATION AUST GUIDE TO LEGAL CITA AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO TO LEGAL CITATION AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGALA CITUSTRATION ALIAN Third Edition GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION AGLC3 - Front Cover 4 (MJ) - CS4.indd 1 21/04/2010 12:32:24 PM AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION Third Edition Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Melbourne 2010 Published and distributed by the Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with the Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Australian guide to legal citation / Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc., Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc. 3rd ed. ISBN 9780646527390 (pbk.). Bibliography. Includes index. Citation of legal authorities - Australia - Handbooks, manuals, etc. Melbourne University Law Review Association Melbourne Journal of International Law 808.06634 First edition 1998 Second edition 2002 Third edition 2010 Reprinted 2010, 2011 (with minor corrections), 2012 (with minor corrections) Published by: Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc Reg No A0017345F · ABN 21 447 204 764 Melbourne University Law Review Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 6593 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 9347 8087 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Internet: <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mulr> Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Reg No A0046334D · ABN 86 930 725 641 Melbourne Journal of International Law Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 7913 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 8344 9774 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Internet: <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mjil> © 2010 Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc and Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Murdoch University School of Law Michael Olds This Thesis Is
    Murdoch University School of Law THE STREAM CANNOT RISE ABOVE ITS SOURCE: THE PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT INFORMING A LIMIT ON THE AMBIT OF THE EXECUTIVE POWER OF THE COMMONWEALTH Michael Olds This thesis is presented in fulfilment of the requirements of a Bachelor of Laws with Honours at Murdoch University in 2016 Word Count: 19,329 (Excluding title page, declaration, copyright acknowledgment, abstract, acknowledgments and bibliography) DECLARATION This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other University. Further, to the best of my knowledge or belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. _______________ Michael Olds ii COPYRIGHT ACKNOWLEDGMENT I acknowledge that a copy of this thesis will be held at the Murdoch University Library. I understand that, under the provisions of s 51(2) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all or part of this thesis may be copied without infringement of copyright where such reproduction is for the purposes of study and research. This statement does not signal any transfer of copyright away from the author. Signed: ………………………………… Full Name of Degree: Bachelor of Laws with Honours Thesis Title: The stream cannot rise above its source: The principle of Responsible Government informing a limit on the ambit of the Executive Power of the Commonwealth Author: Michael Olds Year: 2016 iii ABSTRACT The Executive Power of the Commonwealth is shrouded in mystery. Although the scope of the legislative power of the Commonwealth Parliament has been settled for some time, the development of the Executive power has not followed suit.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Government Advertising and Accountability with Amendments to Term of Reference (A)
    The Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee Government advertising and accountability December 2005 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 71593 9 This document is prepared by the Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Members of the Committee Senator Michael Forshaw (Chair) ALP, NSW Senator John Watson (Deputy Chair) LP, TAS Senator Carol Brown ALP, TAS Senator Mitch Fifield LP, NSW Senator Claire Moore ALP, QLD Senator Andrew Murray AD, WA Substitute member for this inquiry Senator Kim Carr ALP, VIC (replaced Senator Claire Moore from 22 June 2005) Former substitute member for this inquiry Senator Andrew Murray AD, WA (replaced Senator Aden Ridgeway 30 November 2004 to 30 June 2005) Former members Senator George Campbell (discharged 1 July 2005) Senator the Hon William Heffernan (discharged 1 July 2005) Senator Aden Ridgeway (until 30 June 2005) Senator Ursula Stephens (1 July to 13 September 2005) Participating members Senators Abetz, Bartlett, Bishop, Boswell, Brandis, Bob Brown, Carr, Chapman, Colbeck, Conroy, Coonan, Crossin, Eggleston, Evans, Faulkner, Ferguson, Ferris, Fielding, Fierravanti-Wells, Joyce, Ludwig, Lundy, Sandy Macdonald, Mason, McGauran, McLucas, Milne, Moore, O'Brien, Parry, Payne, Ray, Sherry, Siewert, Stephens, Trood and Webber. Secretariat Alistair Sands Committee Secretary Sarah Bachelard Principal Research Officer Matt Keele Research Officer Alex Hodgson Executive Assistant Committee address Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee SG.60 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3530 Fax: 02 6277 5809 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_fpa iii iv Terms of Reference On 18 November 2004, the Senate referred the following matter to the Finance and Public Administration References Committee for inquiry and report by 22 June 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ State Library Level 1
    NJ State Library Level 1 Oversize Books State Reports and Laws Zzz Fiction Collection 001-976 AK TX (by author last name) 900s Superseded NJSA Aaa Biography (B) Zp/P4 US Documents (After 910s) 800s Old NJ Law (by SuDoc Number) Current Law Texts A1.1 A KE Law Reviews National Reporter System (U. of Cincinnati Law Rev. to Zoning & Planning Law Rpt.) 001s National Reporter System Supreme Court Briefs Errors and Appeals Briefs Appellate Division Briefs General Collection General Collection Old NJ Material (published before 2000) (published before 2000) Old British Reports by call number by call number Old U.S. Code Old Law Texts HD Z State Reports and Laws WA WY 300s Law Reading Room* Old NJ Law Staff Old Law Texts 300s Staff Staff Staff Staff Staff *Law Reading Room Call # Ranges: Old NJ Law: NJ KFN 1801 N45 1981 to Key NJ KFN 1930.5 N49 1988 (continues with Note: For Law materials, please NJ KFN 1934.5 to NJ KFX in row 104) refer to “Law Materials Level 1” on Computer Old Law Texts: JX 231 A37 to KF 1375 page 2 of this handout (Online-catalog R69 (continues with HD to Z in row 3) access only) Law Materials Level 1 Title Row Title Row Alabama Reports and Session Laws 107 NJ Forms Legal and Business 11 Alaska Reports and Session Laws 107 NJ Law Journal 119 Alcoholic Beverage Control 12 NJ Law Reports 10 American Digest 99 NJ Law Times Reporter 10 American Jurisprudence 99 NJ Laws 11 Arizona Reports and Session Laws 107 NJ Legislative Index 11 Arkansas Reports and Session Laws 107, 108 NJ Misc.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoning Law Reports for Official Digital Case Law Peter W
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Spring 2011 Abandoning Law Reports for Official Digital Case Law Peter W. Martin Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Courts Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, and the Science and Technology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Peter W., "Abandoning Law Reports for Official Digital Case Law" (2011). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 1197. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/1197 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS ARTICLES ABANDONING LAW REPORTS FOR OFFICIAL DIGITAL CASE LAW* Peter W. Martin** I. INTRODUCTION Like most states Arkansas entered the twentieth century with the responsibility for case law publication imposed by law on a public official lodged within the judicial branch. The "reporter's" office was then, as it is still today, a "constitutional" one.' Title and role reach all the way back to Arkansas's * Q Peter W. Martin, 2011. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Locate a Case Using a Digest
    Sacramento County Public Law Library 609 9th St. Sacramento, CA 95814 saclaw.org (916) 874-6012 >> Home >> Law 101 DIGESTS How to Locate a Case Using a Digest The Law Library has two sets of West Digests in print format (now published by Thomson Reuters): Table of Contents The United States Supreme Court Digest, used to locate 1. How to Locate a Case Using United States Supreme Court cases, is located in Compact Topic and Key Number System in Shelving next to the Supreme Court Reporter, at KF 101 .1 Westlaw ...................................... 2 U55. Like all digests, each volume in the set is updated 2. Abbreviations and Locations of with pocket parts. Case Reporters ............................ 4 West’s California Digest, located in Row C-9 of Compact Shelving at KFC 57 .W47, is used to locate California Supreme Court and California Appellate Court cases. Digests are arranged alphabetically by topic. Examples of the approximately 400 topics are: Banks and Banking, Franchises, Insurance, Libel and Slander, Partnership, Fraud, and Criminal Law. Each topic is divided into subtopics known as "key numbers." A complete list of topic headings is available in the front of each digest volume. A complete list of key numbers is available at the beginning of each topic. A Quick Reference Guide to West Key Number System is available online west.thomson.com/documentation/westlaw/wlawdoc/wlres/keynmb06.pdf. Locate a topic and key number that interests you by scanning the list of topic headings and key numbers or by using the Descriptive Word Index at the end of each set of digests.
    [Show full text]
  • Loislaw Case Coverage Federal Reporters
    Loislaw Case Coverage Loislaw includes comprehensive coverage of cases and associated citations for the reporters and date ranges listed here (except as noted for the F. Supp and B.R. reporters) and select coverage of cases and associated citations for unofficial reporters not listed here or reporters outside of the date ranges we cover. Jurisdiction Court Reporter Citation Style Date Range Volumes Status Federal Reporters U.S. U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Reports U.S. 1754-present 1-present Official Supreme Court Reporter S.Ct. 1935-present 55-present Unofficial U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F.2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F.3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F.2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F.3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F.2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F 3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F.2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F.3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F 2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F.3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F.2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F.3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Federal Reporter, 2d F.2d 1924-1993 1-999 Unofficial Federal Reporter, 3d F.3d 1993-present 1-present Unofficial U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Libraries Legal Research Toolkit for Kentucky
    Public Libraries Legal Research Toolkit for Kentucky Presented by the American Association of Law Libraries Legal Information Services to the Public Special Interest Section (AALL LISP-SIS) Compiled by Marcus Walker, Law School Archivist/Digital Collections Librarian, University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law Library Legislative Branch State Statutes Official printed versions are Baldwin’s Kentucky Revised Statutes (published by Thomson Reuters) and Michie’s Kentucky Revised Statutes (published by LexisNexis). The online version is available at the Legislative Research Commission website: https://legislature.ky.gov/Law/Statutes/Pages/default.aspx. State Constitution The Kentucky Constitution can be found in either of the official versions of the Kentucky Revised Statutes. Michie’s (LexisNexis) has the constitution contained within Volume 1, while Baldwin’s (Thomson Reuters) spreads it out over Volumes 1, 2, and 2A. An online version can be found at the Legislative Research Commission website: https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/constitution. The page is divided into topics. Click on a topic for a summary for each constitutional article. Click the summary to read the full text of the article as a PDF. State Session Laws If you are seeking acts passed within a current session, the Secretary of State maintains a database of enacted legislation that is updated almost immediately after approval. Go to https://www.sos.ky.gov/admin/Executive/legislation/Pages/default.aspx, and click the database link. At the end of each session, the Legislative Research Commission produces bound volumes of the Kentucky Acts with the legislation arranged in chronological order. An online version is available at https://legislature.ky.gov/Law/Pages/KyActs.aspx.
    [Show full text]
  • California Style Manual
    CALIFORNIA STYLE MANUAL Fourth Edition A HANDBOOK OF LEGAL STYLE FOR CALIFORNIA COURTS AND LAWYERS By Edward W. Jessen Reporter of Decisions for the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal .W4-23370-9 ©1942, 1961, 1977, 1986,2000 by the Supreme Court of California Page composition by Imagelnk, San Francisco Cover design by Side by Side Designs, San Francisco Editiorial preparation and manufacturing West Group, California's Official Legal Publisher FOREWORD For almost 60 years, the legal community of California has benefited from the publication of the California Style Manual. The manual provides a guide to standard legal style in the appellate courts, and benefits litigants and jurists alike by establishing a common stylistic base that permits read- ers to focus readily on substance rather than form. In the 14 years since publication of the third edition of the Style Manual, much has changed in the processes used for creating legal docu- ments. A personal computer on the desk is now the rule rather than the exception for most lawyers and judges. At the same time, the availability of diverse reference resources has expanded the ease and scope of research. This latest revision of the manual reflects and responds to many of the changes that the legal profession has experienced, while maintaining a steady hold on the practices that have served the courts and the profession so well. I extend my appreciation to the Reporter of Decisions and those who have assisted him in the task of revising this valuable reference tool. Ronald M. George Chief Justice of California iii SUPREME COURT APPROVAL To the Reporter of Decisions: Pursuant to the authority conferred on the Supreme Court of Cali- fornia by Government Code section 68902, the California Style Manual, Fourth Edition, as submitted to this court for review is approved and adopted as the official organ for the styles to be used in the publication of the Official Reports.
    [Show full text]