DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Guide to Legal Citation, Third Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL AUSTRALIAN CITATION AUST GUIDE TO LEGAL CITA AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO TO LEGAL CITATION AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGALA CITUSTRATION ALIAN Third Edition GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION AGLC3 - Front Cover 4 (MJ) - CS4.indd 1 21/04/2010 12:32:24 PM AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION Third Edition Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Melbourne 2010 Published and distributed by the Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with the Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Australian guide to legal citation / Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc., Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc. 3rd ed. ISBN 9780646527390 (pbk.). Bibliography. Includes index. Citation of legal authorities - Australia - Handbooks, manuals, etc. Melbourne University Law Review Association Melbourne Journal of International Law 808.06634 First edition 1998 Second edition 2002 Third edition 2010 Reprinted 2010, 2011 (with minor corrections), 2012 (with minor corrections) Published by: Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc Reg No A0017345F · ABN 21 447 204 764 Melbourne University Law Review Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 6593 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 9347 8087 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Internet: <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mulr> Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Reg No A0046334D · ABN 86 930 725 641 Melbourne Journal of International Law Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 7913 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 8344 9774 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Internet: <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mjil> © 2010 Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc and Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc. This work is protected by the laws of copyright. Except for any uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) or equivalent overseas legislation, no part of this work may be reproduced, in any manner or in any medium, without the written permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. The Australian Guide to Legal Citation has been adopted by: Adelaide Law Review Alternative Law Journal Australasian Journal of Natural Resource Law and Policy Australia and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal Australian Indigenous Law Review Australian International Law Journal Australian Law Librarian Bond Law Review Constitutional Law and Policy Review Deakin Law Review eLaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law Elder Law Review Federal Law Review Flinders Law Journal Indigenous Law Bulletin James Cook University Law Review Journal of Applied Law and Policy Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association Journal Jurisprudence Journal of Law and Financial Management Journal of Law, Information and Science Journal of Social Security and Workers Compensation Legal Education Review Legal Issues in Business Media and Arts Law Review Melbourne Journal of International Law Melbourne University Law Review Monash University Law Review New Zealand Armed Forces Law Review Newcastle Law Review Proctor Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal Revenue Law Journal Sports Law eJournal Sydney Law Review University of New England Law Journal University of New South Wales Law Journal University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review University of Tasmania Law Review University of Western Sydney Law Review The Melbourne University Law Review Association and the Melbourne Journal of International Law gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the sponsors of the third edition of the Australian Guide to Legal Citation. v Foreword to the Third Edition The third edition of the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (‘Guide’) deserves celebration. The Guide is the successor to the Melbourne University Law Review Style Guide, the bane and vade mecum of student editors for many years. The first edition of the Guide appeared in 1998 and the second in 2002. This third edition is considerably longer and more detailed than its predecessors, offering guidance on the citation of new sources of law. Until I worked on the Melbourne University Law Review as a student in the 1970s, I was oblivious to the delights, agonies and obsessions of editorial style and citation methods. That experience imparted enduring respect for well-tempered punctuation as well as accurate and judicious footnoting. It is easy to dismiss rules of punctuation and legal citation as the province of pedants and to imply that attention to such matters privileges style over substance. Punctuation, however, can be critical to meaning and clarity. Lynne Truss acknowledges this significance in her charming meditation on punctuation, Eats, Shoots and Leaves, which she dedicates: To the memory of the striking Bolshevik printers of St Petersburg who, in 1905, demanded to be paid the same rate for punctuation marks as for letters, and thereby directly precipitated the first Russian Revolution.1 As for citation, scholars have a responsibility to acknowledge the sources of their information and ideas carefully so that they can be readily traced by their readers. In this sense, citation practices are akin to musical scales — technical exercises that ground scholarly sonatas. The third edition expands and updates earlier versions of the Guide. Now legal scholars have a stern but reliable guide to the vexing issue of the use of ellipses in quotations, or the citation of parties’ submissions in court cases. The distinction between em- and en-dashes is helpfully explicated. One particularly welcome change from earlier editions is the inclusion of examples for almost all rules. The third edition also contains a number of tables that present complex rules in a simple and accessible manner. This volume mirrors the increasing significance of both comparative and international law in Australian legal scholarship. The earlier single chapter on the citation of international materials has now become seven chapters. The international section (Part IV) devotes considerable attention to treaties and the documents generated by international institutions. It includes an entirely new chapter on the citation of documents from international criminal tribunals, reflecting the astonishing growth in the law in this area over the past decade. 1 Lynne Truss, Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation (Profile Books, 2003) v. vi Part V introduces rules for citing legal materials from China, France, Germany, Malaysia, Singapore and South Africa and contains extensive revisions of rules relating to the United Kingdom and the United States. Such guidelines will enhance the accessibility of foreign legal sources and thus gently erode Australian legal parochialism. The third edition is the product of intense and detailed work. It is meticulous without being stultifying. The authors are respectful sticklers working on behalf of readers everywhere and all Australian legal scholars will benefit from the careful scrutiny and sensibility of the three generations of the Guide’s authors. Sticklers unite! Like the printers of St Petersburg, the authors of this Guide take the conventions of language and research seriously. May this compendium repay their hard work by encouraging precision in prose and clarity in citation. Hilary Charlesworth Professor of Law and ARC Federation Fellow The Australian National University Melbourne University Law Review Editor 1979 January 2010 vii Foreword to the First Edition Many publishers and some publications have their own Style Guides. For years, the editors of the Melbourne University Law Review referred to the Style Guide published by the Review’s constituent body to solve problems of how to cite materials referred to in the articles and notes appearing in each issue. Now the Melbourne University Law Review Association has produced an Australian Guide to Legal Citation. The project is ambitious. As its Preface says, the Guide ‘attempts to set down and clarify citation customs where they exist, and to determine the best practice where no particular custom has been established’. In so doing the Association seeks to emulate other, long established and authoritative citation guides published by university law reviews. Of these, the ‘Bluebook’ is, perhaps, the best known. Published by a group of law reviews led by the Harvard Law Review, The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation has become the standard work in the field in the United States and has now passed through many editions. Other university law reviews have entered the field, for example, the University of Chicago Manual of Legal Citation and, in Canada, the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation published by the McGill Law Journal. Not all such works attract only praise. Judge Posner has written of the Bluebook that it ‘creates an atmosphere of formality and redundancy in which the drab, Latinate, plethoric, euphemistic style of law reviews and judicial opinions flourishes’.1 But this Guide is not, and does not pretend to be a guide to legal style any more than it is a guide to substantive law. The Guide is concerned only with how sources may be identified. Its principles require that they be identified clearly and accurately, simply and efficiently, and with due sensitivity. The way in which the material from
Recommended publications
  • Statute Law Repeals: Twentieth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill

    Statute Law Repeals: Twentieth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill

    2015: 50 years promoting law reform Statute Law Repeals: Twentieth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill LC357 / SLC243 The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM No 357) (SCOT LAW COM No 243) STATUTE LAW REPEALS: TWENTIETH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers June 2015 Cm 9059 SG/2015/60 © Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Print ISBN 9781474119337 Web ISBN 9781474119344 ID 20051507 05/15 49556 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ii The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman Professor Elizabeth Cooke1 Stephen Lewis Professor David Ormerod QC Nicholas Paines QC. The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Elaine Lorimer. The Law Commission is located at 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London SW1H 9AG The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Pentland, Chairman Caroline Drummond David Johnston QC Professor Hector L MacQueen Dr Andrew J M Steven The Chief Executive of the Scottish Law Commission is Malcolm McMillan.
  • Journals House of Lords

    Journals House of Lords

    977607FCOV PPSysB Page 1 06-10-05 18:32:09 Layout: COVERS Unit: PAG3 JOURNALS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2003-04 VOLUME 237 LAID ON THE TABLE BY THE CLERK OF THE PARLIAMENTS PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS BY THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 9776079000 13-10-05 13:36:25 Table: LJOIND PPSysB Unit: PAG1 2003–04 911 GENERAL INDEX See also Judicial Index and Membership of the House, below Abbreviations: Finding aids: 1a;2a;3a First, second, third readings AFFIRMATIVE INSTRUMENTS CWH Committee of the Whole House COMMITTEES DPRRC Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform DIVISIONS Committee GRAND COMMITTEE GC Grand Committee MOTIONS (including motions to HC House of Commons annul (“Prayers”)) HL House of Lords “PING-PONG” HM Her Majesty PRE-LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY JCCB Joint Committee on Consolidation Bills PRIVATE BILLS JCHR Joint Committee on Human Rights PUBLIC BILLS RA Royal Assent SPECIAL PROCEDURE ORDERS SO Standing Order UNSTARRED QUESTIONS UBC Unopposed Bill Committee Abortion: Reports: Unstarred question, 16 Mar, 261. 1st (Smoking Policy in the House of Lords), 16 Nov, 875. ccess to justice A : Adolescent Health: Motion for papers, after debate, withdrawn, Unstarred question, 15 Jun, 508. 16 Jun, 515. Adoption Act 1976: Access to Justice Act 1999: Papers (per Act): 5 Feb, 154; 19 Apr, 363; 7 Papers (per Act): 9 Mar, 237; 29 Mar, 320; 26 Sep, 671. Apr, 385; 20 Jul, 651; 7 Sep, 672; 9 Nov, 841. Affirmative Instruments: [Hybrid instruments are marked *. Regulatory Acquisition of Land Act 1981: reform orders are not included] See Papers (per Act): 11 Oct, 726.
  • Seminary Studies

    Seminary Studies

    ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES VOLUME VI JANUARI 1968 NUMBER I CONTENTS Heimmerly-Dupuy, Daniel, Some Observations on the Assyro- Babylonian and Sumerian Flood Stories Hasel, Gerhard F., Sabbatarian Anabaptists of the Sixteenth Century: Part II 19 Horn, Siegfried H., Where and When was the Aramaic Saqqara Papyrus Written ? 29 Lewis, Richard B., Ignatius and the "Lord's Day" 46 Neuffer, Julia, The Accession of Artaxerxes I 6o Specht, Walter F., The Use of Italics in English Versions of the New Testament 88 Book Reviews iio ANDREWS UNIVERSITY BERRIEN SPRINGS, MICHIGAN 49104, USA ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES The Journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary of Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan SIEGFRIED H. HORN Editor EARLE HILGERT KENNETH A. STRAND Associate Editors LEONA G. RUNNING Editorial Assistant SAKAE Kos() Book Review Editor ROY E. BRANSON Circulation Manager ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES publishes papers and short notes in English, French and German on the follow- ing subjects: Biblical linguistics and its cognates, textual criticism, exegesis, Biblical archaeology and geography, an- cient history, church history, theology, philosophy of religion, ethics and comparative religions. The opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors. ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES is published in January and July of each year. The annual subscription rate is $4.00. Payments are to be made to Andrews University Seminary Studies, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104, USA. Subscribers should give full name and postal address when paying their subscriptions and should send notice of change of address at least five weeks before it is to take effect; the old as well as the new address must be given.
  • From Mabo to Yorta Yorta: Native Title Law in Australia

    From Mabo to Yorta Yorta: Native Title Law in Australia

    Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 19 Access to Justice: The Social Responsibility of Lawyers | Contemporary and Comparative Perspectives on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples January 2005 From Mabo to Yorta Yorta: Native Title Law in Australia Lisa Strelein Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Lisa Strelein, From Mabo to Yorta Yorta: Native Title Law in Australia, 19 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 225 (2005), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol19/iss1/14 This Rights of Indigenous Peoples - Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Mabo to Yorta Yorta: Native Title Law in Australia Dr. Lisa Strelein* INTRODUCTION In more than a decade since Mabo v. Queensland II’s1 recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights to their traditional lands, the jurisprudence of native title has undergone significant development. The High Court of Australia decisions in Ward2 and Yorta Yorta3 in 2002 sought to clarify the nature of native title and its place within Australian property law, and within the legal system more generally. Since these decisions, lower courts have had time to apply them to native title issues across the country. This Article briefly examines the history of the doctrine of discovery in Australia as a background to the delayed recognition of Indigenous rights in lands and resources.
  • The Patents Act 1977 (As Amended)

    The Patents Act 1977 (As Amended)

    The Patents Act 1977 (as amended) An unofficial consolidation produced by Patents Legal Section 1 October 2013 Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Note to users This is an unofficial consolidation of the Patents Act 1977, as amended up to and including 1 October 2013. This consolidation therefore includes (amongst other changes) the amendments to the 1977 Act made by: the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 the Patents and Trade Marks (World Trade Organisation) Regulations 1999 the Patents Regulations 2000 the Enterprise Act 2002 the Regulatory Reform (Patents) Order 2004 the Patents Act 2004, the Medicines (Marketing Authorisations etc.) Amendment Regulations 2005 the Intellectual Property (Enforcement, etc.) Regulations 2006 the Patents (Compulsory Licensing and Supplementary Protection Certificates) Regulations 2007 the Legal Services Act 2007 the Patents Act 1977 (Amendment) Regulations 2011, and the Crime and Courts Act 2013 In some cases, the amending legislation applies transitional provisions to the changes made to the 1977 Act. It is particularly important to be aware of these transitional provisions in the case of the changes made by the Regulatory Reform (Patents) Order 2004 and by certain provisions of the Patents Act 2004. A number of the repealed provisions of the 1977 Act have been re-enacted or replaced by new provisions of that Act or by provisions in other legislation. Some wording of the 1977 Act has been ‘modified in effect’ by other pieces of legislation, although not actually amended, and footnotes show where this is the case. The Manual of Patent Practice should be consulted for more guidance on all these matters.
  • Patents Act 1977 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 19 August 2021

    Patents Act 1977 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 19 August 2021

    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: Patents Act 1977 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 19 August 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Patents Act 1977 1977 CHAPTER 37 An Act to establish a new law of patents applicable to future patents and applications for patents; to amend the law of patents applicable to existing patents and applications for patents; to give effect to certain international conventions on patents; and for connected purposes. [29th July 1977] Extent Information E1 This Act does not extend to the Channel Islands or the Colonies for extent provision see s. 132(2) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended (with modifications) (2.1.1993) by S.I. 1992/3091, reg.5 Act extended (8.2.1997) by S.I. 1996/3120, reg. 5 Act applied (8.2.1997) by S.I. 1997/64, rule 9 Act extended (1.3.2002) by The Patents and Plant Variety Rights (Compulsory Licensing) Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/247), reg. 26(1) (subject to reg. 26(2)(3)) C2 Act modified (10.6.2003) by Patents Act 1977 (Isle of Man) Order 2003 (S.I. 2003/1249), arts. 2, 3, Sch. C3 Act modified (Isle of Man) (11.11.2013) by The Patents (Isle of Man) Order 2013 (S.I.
  • Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?

    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?

    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts? Kcasey McLoughlin BA (Hons) LLB (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Newcastle January 2016 Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University's Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Kcasey McLoughlin ii Acknowledgments I am most grateful to my principal supervisor, Jim Jose, for his unswerving patience, willingness to share his expertise and for the care and respect he has shown for my ideas. His belief in challenging disciplinary boundaries, and seemingly limitless generosity in mentoring others to do so has sustained me and this thesis. I am honoured to have been in receipt of his friendship, and owe him an enormous debt of gratitude for his unstinting support, assistance and encouragement. I am also grateful to my co-supervisor, Katherine Lindsay, for generously sharing her expertise in Constitutional Law and for fostering my interest in the High Court of Australia and the judges who sit on it. Her enthusiasm, very helpful advice and intellectual guidance were instrumental motivators in completing the thesis. The Faculty of Business and Law at the University of Newcastle has provided a supportive, collaborative and intellectual space to share and debate my research.
  • Social Security Act 2000

    Social Security Act 2000

    c i e AT 5 of 2000 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 2000 Social Security Act 2000 Index c i e SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 2000 Index Section Page 1 Application to the Island of Acts of Parliament etc ................................................... 5 1A Power to make other provision in respect of social security .................................... 6 2 Orders: supplemental provisions ................................................................................. 7 3 Interpretation ................................................................................................................... 7 4 Short title etc .................................................................................................................... 8 SCHEDULE 1 9 ACTS OF PARLIAMENT TO WHICH SECTION 1 APPLIES 9 SCHEDULE 2 11 ENACTMENTS REPEALED OR REVOKED 11 ENDNOTES 13 TABLE OF LEGISLATION HISTORY 13 TABLE OF RENUMBERED PROVISIONS 13 TABLE OF ENDNOTE REFERENCES 13 c AT 5 of 2000 Page 3 Social Security Act 2000 Section 1 c i e SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 2000 Received Royal Assent: 2 March 2000 Passed: 21 March 2000 Commenced: 21 March 2000 AN ACT to provide for the application to the Island of certain Acts of Parliament and statutory instruments relating to social security; and for connected purposes. 1 Application to the Island of Acts of Parliament etc (1) The Treasury may by order apply to the Island as part of the law of the Island, subject to such exceptions, adaptations and modifications as may be specified in the order, any legislation of the United Kingdom to which this
  • Who's That with Abrahams

    Who's That with Abrahams

    barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008/09 Who’s that with Abrahams KC? Rediscovering Rhetoric Justice Richard O’Connor rediscovered Bullfry in Shanghai | CONTENTS | 2 President’s column 6 Editor’s note 7 Letters to the editor 8 Opinion Access to court information The costs circus 12 Recent developments 24 Features 75 Legal history The Hon Justice Foster The criminal jurisdiction of the Federal The Kyeema air disaster The Hon Justice Macfarlan Court NSW Law Almanacs online The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Hon Justice Ward Saving St James Church 40 Addresses His Honour Judge Michael King SC Justice Richard Edward O’Connor Rediscovering Rhetoric 104 Personalia The current state of the profession His Honour Judge Storkey VC 106 Obituaries Refl ections on the Federal Court 90 Crossword by Rapunzel Matthew Bracks 55 Practice 91 Retirements 107 Book reviews The Keble Advocacy Course 95 Appointments 113 Muse Before the duty judge in Equity Chief Justice French Calderbank offers The Hon Justice Nye Perram Bullfry in Shanghai Appearing in the Commercial List The Hon Justice Jagot 115 Bar sports barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008-09 Bar News Editorial Committee Cover the New South Wales Bar Andrew Bell SC (editor) Leonard Abrahams KC and Clark Gable. Association. Keith Chapple SC Photo: Courtesy of Anthony Abrahams. Contributions are welcome and Gregory Nell SC should be addressed to the editor, Design and production Arthur Moses SC Andrew Bell SC Jeremy Stoljar SC Weavers Design Group Eleventh Floor Chris O’Donnell www.weavers.com.au Wentworth Chambers Duncan Graham Carol Webster Advertising 180 Phillip Street, Richard Beasley To advertise in Bar News visit Sydney 2000.
  • The Australian Legal System Contact Points Where Law Comes from Libraries Griffith University

    The Australian Legal System Contact Points Where Law Comes from Libraries Griffith University

    The Australian Legal System Contact Points Where Law Comes From Libraries Griffith University https://www.griffith.edu.au/library Queensland University of Technology Law Library https://www.qut.edu.au/law/about/qut–law–library Supreme Court Library http://www.sclqld.org.au/ University of Queensland Walter Harrison Law Library https://web.library.uq.edu.au/locations-hours/law-library-walter-harrison-library James Cook University University Library https://www.jcu.edu.au/library © 2016 Caxton Legal Centre Inc. queenslandlawhandbook.org.au 1 The Court System Commonwealth Administrative Appeals Tribunal http://www.aat.gov.au/ Family Court of Australia http://www.familycourt.gov.au//wps/wcm/connect/fcoaweb/home Federal Court of Australia http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/ Federal Circuit Court of Australia http://www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au//wps/wcm/connect/fccweb/home High Court of Australia http://www.hcourt.gov.au/ Queensland All Queensland state courts are listed on the Queensland courts website. http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/courts Department of Justice and Attorney-General http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/ Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal http://www.qcat.qld.gov.au/ Self-representation Court Network http://www.courtnetwork.com.au/Whatcouldwedoforyou.aspx QPILCH Self Representation Service www.qpilch.org.au Self-Represented Litigants Service (SRLS) http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/representing-yourself-in-court/advice-and-support Mediation services Australian Commercial Disputes Centre https://disputescentre.com.au/ Relationships Australia Queensland http://www.raq.org.au Dispute Resolution Centres https://www.qld.gov.au/law/legal-mediation-and-justice-of-the-peace/setting-disputes-out-of- court/dispute-resolution-centres/ Legal Aid Queensland http://www.legalaid.qld.gov.au © 2016 Caxton Legal Centre Inc.
  • Research Guide

    Research Guide

    Research Guide FINDING CASES I. HOW TO FIND A CASE WHEN YOU KNOW THE CITATION A. DECIPHERING LEGAL CITATIONS 1. CASE CITATIONS A case citation includes: the names of the parties, the volume number of the case reporter, the abbreviated name of the reporter, the page number where the case can be found, and the year of the decision. EXAMPLE: Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta, 30 Cal.3d 800 (1982). Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta = names of the parties 30 = volume number of the case reporter Cal. = abbreviated name of the case reporter, California Reports 3d = series number of the case reporter, California Reports 800 = page number of the case reporter (1982) = year of the decision 2. ABBREVIATIONS OF REPORTER NAMES The abbreviations used in citations can be deciphered by consulting: a. Prince’s Bieber Dictionary of Legal Abbreviations, 6th ed. (Ref. KF 246 .p74 2009) b. Black's Law Dictionary (Ref. KF 156 .B624 2009). This legal dictionary contains a table of abbreviations. Copies of Black's are located on dictionary stands throughout the library, as well as in the Reference Collection. 3. REPORTERS AND PARALLEL CITATIONS A case may be published in more than one reporter. Parallel citations indicate the different reporters publishing the same case. EXAMPLE: Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta, 30 Cal.3d 800, 180 Cal. Rptr. 628, 640 P.2d 764 (1982). 02/08/12 (Rev.) RG14 (OVER) This case will be found in three places: the "official" California Reports 3d (30 Cal. 3rd 800); and the two "unofficial" West reporters: the California Reporter (180 Cal.
  • The Court of Session Etc. Fees Order 2018

    The Court of Session Etc. Fees Order 2018

    SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2018 No. 83 COURT OF SESSION The Court of Session etc. Fees Order 2018 Made - - - - 23rd February 2018 Laid before the Scottish Parliament 27th February 2018 Coming into force in accordance with article 1 The Scottish Ministers make the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by section 107(1) and (2) of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014(a) and all other powers enabling them to do so. Citation, commencement and effect 1. —(1) This Order may be cited as the Court of Session etc. Fees Order 2018 and, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), comes into force on 25th April 2018. (2) Article 3(2)(b) and schedule 2 come into force, and article 3(2)(a) and schedule 1 cease to have effect, on 1st April 2019. (3) Article 3(2)(c) and schedule 3 come into force, and article 3(2)(b) and schedule 2 cease to have effect, on 1st April 2020. Interpretation 2. —(1) In this Order— “Office of Court” has the same meaning as in Rule 3.1 of the Rules of Court; “partner” means a person to whom a person is married, or with whom the person is in a civil partnership; “Rules of Court” mean the Rules of the Court of Session 1994( b); “Table of Fees” means the Table of Fees in schedule 1, 2 or 3 of this Order. (2) For the purposes of any reference in this Order to a party— (a) except in relation to a special case, a set of persons with the same interest, for whom one and the same first paper is or has been lodged, is to be treated as a single party; and (b) in relation to a special case, each person or set of persons who appear as one of the separate parties to the case is to be treated as a party.