The Ubiquitin-Like Modifier FAT10 in Cancer Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology ; 79 (2016). - S. 451-461 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2016.07.001 The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 in cancer development a a,b,∗ Annette Aichem , Marcus Groettrup a Biotechnology Institute Thurgau at the University of Konstanz, CH-8280 Kreuzlingen, Switzerland b Division of Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany a b s t r a c t During the last years it has emerged that the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 is directly involved in cancer development. FAT10 expression is highly up-regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-␥ and TNF-␣ in all cell types and tissues and it was also found to be up-regulated in many cancer types such as glioma, colorectal, liver or gastric cancer. While pro-inflammatory cytokines within the tumor microenvironment probably contribute to FAT10 overexpression, an increasing body of evidence argues that pro-malignant capacities of FAT10 itself largely underlie its broad and intense overexpression in tumor tissues. FAT10 thereby regulates pathways involved in cancer development such as the NF-B- or Wnt-signaling. More- over, FAT10 directly interacts with and influences downstream targets such as MAD2, p53 or -catenin, leading to enhanced survival, proliferation, invasion and metastasis formation of cancer cells but also of non-malignant cells. In this review we will provide an overview of the regulation of FAT10 expression as well as its function in carcinogenesis. Contents 1. Introduction . 452 2. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10, a protein of the immune system . 452 2.1. The structure of FAT10 and how it targets for proteasomal degradation . 452 2.2. FAT10 in adaptive and innate immunity . 452 2.3. Which are the targets of FAT10 and how is it conjugated to its substrates . 453 3. Regulation of FAT10 expression under inflammatory conditions and during cancer development . 454 3.1. FAT10 expression levels in different cancer types . 454 3.2. The transforming capacity of FAT10 . 454 4. What are the mechanisms behind FAT10 overexpression?. .455 5. Functional consequences of FAT10 up-regulation in inflammation and cancer. .455 5.1. MAD2 and chromosomal instability . 455 5.2. p53 . 456 5.3. -catenin . 458 5.4. Smad2 . 459 6. Summary and future prospects . 459 Conflict of interest. .459 Acknowledgements . 459 References . 459 Abbreviations: AIPL1, aryl-hydrocarbon receptor like-1; APC/C, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome; DUB, deubiquitylating enzyme; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; FAT10, HLA-F adjacent transcript 10; GSK, glycogen synthase kinase; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HOX, homeobox; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; MAD2, mitotic arrest deficient 2; mTEC, medullary thymic epithelial cells; NF-B, nuclear factor kappa-B; NUB1L, NEDD8-ultimate buster 1 long; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; SUMO, small-ubiquitin-like modifier; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; UBD, Ubiquitin D; ULM, ubiquitin-like modifier; UPS, ubiquitin proteasome system; USE1, UBA6-specific E2 enzyme 1. ∗ Corresponding author at: Division of Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstr. 10, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Groettrup). Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-347923 452 1. Introduction for activation and covalent attachment to substrate proteins by an E1–E3 enzymatic cascade (Hochstrasser, 2009). Of all these ULMs, A causal link between chronic inflammation or infection and FAT10 is the only modifier which acts as an autonomous transfer- tumorigenesis is nowadays a generally accepted principle leading able signal for degradation by the 26S proteasome and it was shown to the development of various cancer types. The underlying mech- that this process can occur independently of ubiquitin (Hipp et al., anism is in part based on the upregulation and secretion of several 2005; Schmidtke et al., 2009). FAT10 is a protein of the immune sys- proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)␣, tem and it is strongly up-regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines interferon (IFN)␥ or interleukin-6 (IL-6) by stromal cells as well (Fan et al., 1996; Raasi et al., 1999) and during the maturation as by infiltrating immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, of antigen presenting cells (Buerger et al., 2015; Ebstein et al., or by cytokines, secreted by tumor cells themselves (Zamarron 2009; Lukasiak et al., 2008). Moreover, numerous recent publica- and Chen, 2011). Such inflammatory conditions are generated to tions point to a direct involvement of FAT10 in cancer development. promote healing and regeneration of the affected tissue. How- These recent insights will be presented in this review along with ever, the persisting expression of these cytokines can also provide the current state of knowledge on the regulation and function of a niche for cancer development by promoting DNA damage and FAT10 expression in inflammation and tumorigenesis (Fig. 1). abnormal tissue healing. This is based on the fact that pro- inflammatory cytokines cause the activation of transcription 2. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10, a protein of the factors such as nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-B) and signal trans- immune system ducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3, which play a central role as activators of anti-apoptotic gene expression and cell prolif- 2.1. The structure of FAT10 and how it targets for proteasomal eration. Furthermore, these cytokines promote optimal conditions degradation for tumor cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis formation, apoptosis resistance as well as angiogenesis, i.e. processes which The Fat10 gene (originally designated Ubiquitin D (Ubd)) was are all prerequisites for cancer development (Grivennikov et al., identified by genomic sequencing of the human major histocom- 2010; Karin, 2006). patibility complex (MHC) by Sherman Weissman and colleagues in The reversible post-translational modification of proteins with 1996 (Fan et al., 1996). The structural model of the 165 amino acid a single ubiquitin or with ubiquitin chains is an important mech- long, 18 kDa protein FAT10 as well as a previously published NMR anism to regulate the function, activity, cellular distribution but structure of the N-terminal ubiquitin-like domain of FAT10 predicts also the stability of proteins by mediating their proteolysis by the two ubiquitin-like domains, both with a typical -grasp fold. The N- 26S proteasome. The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is not and C-terminal ubiquitin-like domains are 29% and 36% identical to only an important regulator of protein degradation but also reg- ubiquitin, respectively, arranged in a tandem array and separated ulates cancer-relevant processes such as cell cycle progression, by a short linker (Fan et al., 1996; Groettrup et al., 2008; Theng et al., proliferation, DNA damage response, angiogenesis and apoptosis 2014). In contrast to ubiquitin and other ubiquitin-like modifiers (Ciechanover, 1998; Haglund and Dikic, 2005). Moreover, inhibitors which are expressed as inactive precursors and which need to be of the proteasome are already in use or under further investiga- activated by proteolytic processing at their C-terminus by specific tion for the development of cancer therapies (Chen and Dou, 2010; proteases (Kerscher et al., 2006), FAT10 is already synthesized as a Tu et al., 2012). Ubiquitylation as well as poly-ubiquitylation is mature protein with a free diglycine motif at its C-terminus and can achieved by an enzymatic cascade where first ubiquitin is adeny- directly be activated and conjugated to substrate proteins (Raasi lated at its C-terminal diglycine residue by one of its two ubiquitin et al., 2001). A central function of FAT10 modification is to target E1 activating enzymes UBE1 (Ciechanover et al., 1981) or UBA6 (Jin proteins for degradation by the proteasome (Hipp et al., 2005; Raasi et al., 2007; Pelzer et al., 2007) and then transferred onto the active et al., 2001; Schmidtke et al., 2014). This process was shown to site-cysteine of the respective E1 enzyme to form a thioester bond. be independent of ubiquitylation but to be dependent on a non- In a second step, ubiquitin is transferred to the active site cysteine of covalent interaction partner of FAT10, namely NEDD8-ultimate a cognate ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (E2) by a transthiolation buster 1 long (NUB1L) (Hipp et al., 2005; Schmidtke et al., 2009, reaction. Finally, different classes of ubiquitin ligases (E3s) catal- 2006). NUB1L, a likewise interferon-inducible protein (Kito et al., yse the isopeptide linkage of ubiquitin to the -amino-group of an 2001), acts as a soluble receptor and brings FAT10 and FAT10ylated internal lysine residue of a substrate protein (Finley, 2009; Kerscher proteins to the proteasome where it binds to the 19S regulatory et al., 2006). Ubiquitin itself contains 7 lysine residues (at positions subunits RPN10 (S5a) and RPN1 (S2). It was shown that FAT10 6, 11, 27, 29, 33, 48 and 63) which are used to build up chains itself could also directly bind to the VWA domain of RPN10 in the of different linkage types conveying different outcomes for such absence of NUB1L but that the docking of NUB1L to the proteasome modified proteins. Modification of a protein with a single ubiqui- was necessary for the accelerated degradation of FAT10 (Rani et al., tin is not enough