DOCSLIB.ORG

Happy Birthday, Libertarian Party! 1 Message

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Happy Birthday, Libertarian Party! 1 Message Caryn Ann Harlos <[email protected]> Happy Birthday, Libertarian Party! 1 message Libertarian National Committee, Inc. <[email protected]> Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:34 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: Caryn Ann Harlos <[email protected]> Dear Caryn Ann, The Libertarian Party of the United States was founded on December 11, 1971, in Colorado Springs. A group of determined Liberty advocates led by David F. Nolan spent five months meeting, debating, and amending what would become the Libertarian Party’s first platform. Recognizing that the Republicans and Democrats had abandoned the original principles of Liberty the American founding fathers had set forth, this group, including John Hospers, Ed Crane, Manuel Klausner, Murray Rothbard, Roy Childs, Tonie Nathan, and Jim Dean, formed a party dedicated to the ideas of all markets being completely free. Today we are celebrating our 48th birthday and the great gift bestowed upon us and the nation by our party founders — and we hope you will celebrate the day in Liberty. In 2014, the Libertarian Party began working to purchase a headquarters and established the David. F Nolan Memorial Building Fund. Rent in the DC area has always been extremely high, so purchasing a building saves valuable resources and builds equity for the party’s future. As of November 2019, we have paid off over 80% of the building and 68% of the mortgage! We currently still owe approximately $160,000. Our physical office location in Alexandria, Va., allows us to be headquartered in the center of the political world and has been a key asset in growing our influence and legitimacy in the last few years, as well as giving our team a home in which to organize. Your gift will be felt by decades of future Libertarians who will go on to grow the party and advance our principles. Ownership of a building in this ideal location will ground us in the work that we do and give a permanent home to those who cannot find a comparable vehicle for liberty with any other party in the political universe. At the end of an already thrilling year, we have been given an opportunity that will allow our efforts and our funds to be much more focused in 2020 and the gains we will fight for and win. We are so excited to announce that a gift has been offered to us of up to $60,000 toward the Libertarian Party’s building fund to match any of the birthday gifts you give to the building fund. This opportunity will double any birthday gift to the Libertarian Party you make and could even allow us to pay off our mortgage in 2020! Please consider making whatever year-end gift you can to our building fund to help us take advantage of this matching gift! Thank you, Caryn Ann. From a living room in Colorado to where we are today, we are so grateful for your partnership and your support. We cannot wait to kick off 2020 as our best year ever, once we end 2019 with another victory. Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe Libertarian National Committee, Inc. 1444 Duke St, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appeal Denied in Gates Case " I F Tuesday’S Supreme Court Session
    24 - EVENING HERALD, Mon., Oct. 13, 1880 iUanrhpBtpr Cloudy Variable cloudiness WPATUCD ‘‘’‘*^5'’ Sunny tomorrow and continued cool. ► • j Appeal denied in Gates case " i f Tuesday’s Supreme Court session. By DAVE LAVALLEE C. Bieluch has set a hearing next after the initial order allowed during routine fingerprinting. headquarters at Troop H. Within two The motion to dismiss the appeal was Herald Reporter Tuesday at 10 a.m. to consider the Heiman to appeal the decision to ter­ Bieluch said the evidence sought hours of the completion of the tests. granted without an opinion from the carrying out of the initial order. minate the 2()-day stay. could be of material use to determine GLASTONBURY - The State court. Gates' blood will be analyzed at a ■ In mid-July Bieluch ruled that the " Q Supreme Court in Hartford has dis­ The Supreme Court's ruling, which whether the defendant committed state licensed hospital. state may obtain samples of hair, \ 'v :. y't missed defense attorney Maxwell dismissed Heiman’s appeal of the the murder. He said it could not Heiman, who is defending Larry blood, and body fluids from Gates to Heiman's appeal to block a Hartford order to obtain the evidence, also dis­ , "practicably” be obtained from any Gates is free on 6100,000 bond. Neal Gates, 19, of Glastonbury, who compare them with evidence found in Earthquake damage Superior Court order, requiring that missed the appeal of Bieluch’s other source, Mrs. Hart was found shot to death Homeless victims was arrested June 25 and charged in a car and on the body of Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Presidency
    Women and the Presidency By Cynthia Richie Terrell* I. Introduction As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one”1 given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them.2 Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.”3 The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency. There is a reason, however, why historical inevitably has not yet been realized. Although Americans have selected a president 58 times, a man has won every one of these contests. Before 2019, a major party’s presidential debates had never featured more than one woman. Progress toward gender balance in politics has moved at a glacial pace. In 1937, seventeen years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Gallup conducted a poll in which Americans were asked whether they would support a woman for president “if she were qualified in every other respect?”4 * Cynthia Richie Terrell is the founder and executive director of RepresentWomen, an organization dedicated to advancing women’s representation and leadership in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic Costs and Benefits
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gros, Daniel Article — Digitized Version Regional disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic costs and benefits Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Gros, Daniel (1991) : Regional disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic costs and benefits, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 26, Iss. 5, pp. 207-213, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02928992 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/140311 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu SOVIET UNION Daniel Gros* Regional Disintegration in the Soviet Union: Economic Costs and Benefits The disintegration of the Soviet Union as a pofitical entity has already begun. As an economic entity it is still intact.
    [Show full text]
  • December 6-7, 2008, LNC Meeting Minutes
    LNC Meeting Minutes, December 6-7, 2008, San Diego, CA To: Libertarian National Committee From: Bob Sullentrup CC: Robert Kraus Date: 12/7/2008 Current Status: Automatically Approved Version last updated December 31, 2008 These minutes due out in 30 days: January 6, 2008 Dates below may be superseded by mail ballot: LNC comments due in 45 days: January 21, 2008 Revision released (latest) 14 days prior: February 14, 2009 Barring objection, minutes official 10 days prior: February 18, 2009 * Automatic approval dates relative to February 28 Charleston meeting The meeting commenced at 8:12am on December 6, 2008. Intervening Mail Ballots LNC mail ballots since the last meeting in DC included: • Sent 9/10/2008. Moved, that the tape of any and all recordings of the LNC meeting of Sept 6 & 7, 2008 be preserved until such time as we determine, by a majority vote of the Committee, that they are no longer necessary. Co-Sponsors Rachel Hawkridge, Dan Karlan, Stewart Flood, Lee Wrights, Julie Fox, Mary Ruwart. Passed 13-1, 3 abstentions. o Voting in favor: Michael Jingozian, Bob Sullentrup, Michael Colley, Lee Wrights, Mary Ruwart, Tony Ryan, Mark Hinkle Rebecca Sink-Burris, Stewart Flood, Dan Karlan, James Lark, Julie Fox, Rachel Hawkridge o Opposed: Aaron Starr o Abstaining: Bill Redpath, Pat Dixon, Angela Keaton Moment of Reflection Chair Bill Redpath called for a moment of reflection, a practice at LNC meetings. Opportunity for Public Comment Kevin Takenaga (CA) welcomed the LNC to San Diego. Andy Jacobs (CA) asked why 2000 ballot access signatures were directed to be burned by the LP Political Director in violation of election law? Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. A LeftLeft----LibertarianLibertarian Theory of Rights Arabella Millett Fisher PhD University of Edinburgh 2011 Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................v Declaration.................................................................................................................. vi Introduction..................................................................................................................1 Part I: A Libertarian Theory of Justice...................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLICAN for State Senator
    vote am let Information Your offici~l .l91{) .Pri~ Y:<>ters' Pamphlet; ip YOU MUST BE REGISTERED 20 DAYS BEFORE THE accordance with. f.* nf!w 1977 Qregqn l~w, is .divideclinlli ELECTION IN ORDER FOR YOUR NAME TO BE IN­ fmJr separat~ ~ions. .. < ·.. · . < CLUDED IN THE POLL BOOK. All materialr~l~tting iW f!l~~~ure~ .·appears first. ·'fbi$ in~l~ ;aeh ~~tui:JI)neasur¢, th~ h$-llot titl~; an imp~r~ You may retester and vote within 20 days of .. ti$.l~~~~~t ~laining t~tti~~ and ·i~ ~ffeet .~· election day if: ··•·•• ~.Y ~~en.~.fiJ~ ])y.pro:P()~!lt$1iln9/or opp<m~nts· ';['b,~ 1. You deliver to the appropriate county clerk or a person laW a~l~'f:S t~ legi~~~ture to sul)rtrit an argutne~ti~fa\'Pf .· of ~ . q1easJ;tre .· jt re.f~l'S tO the . })OOple. Cit~:dS or designated by the county clerk a completed voter registra­ ~rg~~tioo$ . may al~ .file arguments by P\ire~i~ tion fonn and obtain a "Certificate of Registration." space for $300 or suf).ndtting a petition signed ])y ~®9 IMPORTANT: If the county clerk receives your applica­ tion more than ten days prior to election day, your el~t$: . .... < / ••• . .. ·.. ·· ··•···•••······• certificate will be mailed to you. During the last ten days ....· .. 'fP~. ~el!;t .·t\v~ ~~~M (i()ntain .material. $ttbmi~ ~/ before the election you must obtain the certificate in can(i.i(i4f.es for ~~~an.~ffices. This y~ar REPUBLIC~ person. Certificates are issued by the county clerk or .ap~.firSt, PEM!()¢~TS ap~.se(X)t).(i, Tbe 9J'der '1~ .
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Awards Committee Report
    2018 AWARDS COMMITTEE REPORT Submitted to: Libertarian National Committee, Apr. 17, 2018 Submitted by: James W. Lark, III Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee Member, 2018 Awards Committee The members of the 2018 Awards Committee are Tim Hagan, Daniel Hayes, and Jim Lark; these members were elected by the LNC during the December 2017 meeting. It is likely two additional members will be elected during the upcoming LNC meeting in Denver. An article soliciting nominations for the 2018 awards appeared on LP.org on Mar. 30; the article is available at www.lp.org/call-nominations-2018-libertarian-party-awards/. A similar article will appear in the next issue of LP News. In addition, solicitations for nominations will be sent to the LP e-mail list; such a solicitation was sent on Apr. 12. Submissions should be sent to [email protected]. The deadline for submissions is 5:00 p.m. EDT on May 31. Please note that the committee has already received several nominations. Two awards ceremonies are scheduled to take place during the LP national convention. At this moment we are uncertain of the dates and times for the ceremonies. APPENDIX: Libertarian Party national award recipients and Hall of Liberty members 1996: Samuel Adams Award: Don Ernsberger Thomas Paine Award: Jacob Hornberger Thomas Jefferson Award: David Nolan 1998: Samuel Adams Award: Steve Dasbach Thomas Paine Award: Harry Browne Thomas Jefferson Award: David Bergland 2000: Samuel Adams Award: Richard Rider Thomas Paine Award: Michael Cloud Thomas Jefferson Award: Ed Clark
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet
    STATE OF OREGON VOTERS' PAMPHLET GENERAL ELECTION November 2, 1976 Complied and Distributed by CLAY MYERS Secretary of State This Voters' Pamphlet Is the personal property of the recipient elector to assist him at the Polls. (ORS 255.025(3)). See page 2 for Voter Instructions and recent election law changes. 2 _______________ Official Voters' Pamphlet INFORMATION STATEMENT The material contained in the Voters' Pamphlet is Written either by the candidate or by designated political committee, by supporters or opponents of ballot measures and by statutorily appointed committees. The Secretary of State then compiles and publishes the statements supplied by the candidates or organizations. Candidates and committees not submitting Voters' Pamphlet material by the legal deadline or who choose not to purchase space are not allocated space in this publication, Each household in the state will receive one Voters' Pamphlet to be shared by all voting members of the household. Additional copies of the Pamphlet are available at the Post Office, Courthouses and other public buildings. VOTER REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS NAME CHANGES You must be registered by October 2, 1976, to have your If your name has changed within 60 days before an election name printed in the poll book. and you have not re-registered, you may vote by presenting proof of the name change to the Election Board at your precinct. YOU MAY REGISTER TO VOTE IF: 1. You are a citizen of the United States 2. You will be 18 or older on election day VOTING BY ABSENTEE BALLOT 3. You are a resident of Oregon YOUMAY APPLY FORAN ABSENTEE BALLOT IF: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Gov. Gary Johnson, Judge Jim Gray Top LP Ticket LP Top Gray Jim Judge Johnson, Gary Gov
    WWW.LP.ORG MiniMuM GovernMent • MaxiMuM FreedoM The Party of Principle™ David Bergland Moderates Wrights/ Johnson Debate - Page 3 June 2012 The Official Newspaper of the Libertarian Party Volume 42, Issue 2 Voting Libertarian is the Only Cure for Big Government - Page 5 Winner of Libertarian Solutions Contest - Page 6 In This Issue: Chair’s Corner.............................2 LPGov. Gary Johnson, News Judge Jim Gray Top LP Ticket roller-coaster ride, a heart-rending LP Presidential Debate................3 celebration of the party’s 40-year A history, the election of our high- profile presidential and vice-presidential Bylaw Changes...........................3 candidates and a refreshing departure from today’s scripted, tightly controlled, and Convention News..................3-6,8 taxpayer-funded Republican and Demo- cratic conventions -- that was the 2012 Platform Changes.......................5 Libertarian National Convention held at the Red Rock Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada LP Candidates......................6-8,11 on May 2 to 6. The presidential debate between Lee Libertarian Solutions..............6,15 Wrights and Gary Johnson was as friendly as a reunion of two old friends. The presi- Awards.......................................8 dential and vice presidential nominations were decisive. The Libertarian Party elected former two-term New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (left) as its presidential can- An array of Libertarian Heroes and diate for the 2012 election. Judge Jim Gray (right), a veteran trial judge in California, was elected Vice President. Gov. Gary Johnson Inverview......9 other fascinating speakers graced the con- Then came the election for party of- ian Presidential nominee, receiving 419 of vention with inspiring talks and powerful, ficers.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Polit
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2019-01-01 Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians? Jacqueline Ann Fiest University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Fiest, Jacqueline Ann, "Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians?" (2019). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1985. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1985 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? JACQUELINE ANN FIEST Master’s Program in Communication APPROVED: Eduardo Barrera, Ph.D., Chair Sarah De Los Santos Upton, Ph.D. Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jacqueline Ann Fiest 2019 Dedication This paper is dedicated to my dear friend Charlotte Wiedel. This would not have been possible without you. Thank you. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? by JACQUELINE ANN FIEST, BA THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]