A Roman Dictator

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Roman Dictator The Artios Home Companion Series Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Teacher Overvie w Julius Caesar is the most famous of the Roman rulers. Many of the Roman rulers were assassinated as others became jealous of the Caesar’s power or were concerned about his tactics. Julius Caesar was assassinated in the Roman Senate and stabbed twenty-three times by senators including his close friend Brutus. Shakespeare wrote depicting these events in his play Julius Caesar. Reading and Assignments Based on your student’s age and ability, the reading in this unit may be read aloud to the student and journaling and notebook pages may be completed orally. Likewise, other assignments can be done with an appropriate combination of independent and guided study. In this unit, students will: Complete two lessons in which they will learn about Julius Caesar. Explore the following website: ▪ Julius Caesar http://www.history.com/topi cs/ancient-history/julius- caesar Visit www.ArtiosHCS.com for additional resources. Key People, Places, and Events Julius Caesar Spartacus Pompey Bust of Gaius Julius Caesar in Naples Ancient: Elementary Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Page 314 Leading Ideas Blessed is the nation whose God is the It is God who executes judgment, LORD, the people whom he has chosen putting down one and lifting up as his heritage! another. — Psalm 33:12 — Psalm 75:7 Additional Material for Parent or Teacher : Julius Caesar http://rome.mrdonn.org/caesar.html Julius Caesar – Eyewitness http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/caesar2.htm Ancient: Elementary Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Page 315 L e s s o n O n e History Overview and Assignments Death of a Republic The Murder of Caesar, by Karl von Piloty (1826-1886), 1865 Reading and Assignments Read the article: Julius Caesar. After reading the article, summarize the story you read by either: ▪ Retelling it out loud to your teacher or parent. OR ▪ Completing an appropriate notebook page. Either way, be sure to include the answers to the discussion questions and an overview of key people, places, dates, and events in your summary. Be sure to visit www.ArtiosHCS.com for additional resources. Key People, Places, and Events Julius Caesar Spartacus Pompey Ancient: Elementary Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Page 316 Discussion Questions 1. How did Julius Caesar die? 4. What language is Julius Caesar believed 2. What close friend of Caesar’s was to have spoken? involved in his murder? 5. How did Julius Caesar come to power? 3. Why did the senators murder Caesar? Adapted for Elementary School from the book: Ancient Civilizations source ushistory.org Julius Caesar members of the Senate took turns stabbing Julius Caesar (100-44 B.C.), the dictator of the entire Roman Empire. Stunned that even his good friend Brutus was in on the plot, Caesar choked out his final words: “kai su, teknon?” (“You too, my child?”). On the steps of the Senate, the most powerful man in the ancient world died in a pool of his own blood. Julius Caesar’s military might, political savvy, and diplomatic genius made him supremely popular among the Roman citizenry. The first conspirator greeted Caesar, Roman soldiers’ appearance changed very little over the then plunged a knife into his neck. Other centuries. The army of Julius Caesar looked very similar to the soldiers in this 2nd-century B.C. carving. stabbers followed suit. One by one, several Ancient: Elementary Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Page 317 About “Et Tu, Brute?” reform the situation by two brothers, In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, were met with Caesar, the title character manages to utter opposition that eventually resulted in their “Et tu, Brute?” (“and you, Brutus?”) as he is deaths. slain. This is not historically accurate. According to the 1st century A.D. Roman historian Suetonius, Julius Caesar spoke mainly Greek and not Latin, as was the case with most patricians at the time. In his history about the life of Julius Caesar, Suetonius writes that as the assassins Julius Caesar led his Roman legions as far north as plunged their daggers into the dictator, Britain in 55 B.C. He and his army may have seen this view upon landing at Deal Beach. Caesar saw Brutus and spoke the Greek phrase “kai su, teknon,” meaning “you too, In addition, slavery was on the rise, and my child.” violent slave revolts were commonplace. There is still debate whether or not it was shouted in shock or spoken as a warning. On one hand, Caesar may have been amazed to find a close friend like Brutus trying to kill him; on the other hand, he may have meant that Brutus would pay for his crime in the future for this treachery. Either way, the words were Greek, so we’ll leave “Et tu, Brute?” for Shakespeare. Roman coins celebrated Caesar’s military victories in In this 19th century painting by Abel de Pujol, Caesar Gaul (present-day France). leaves his wife on the Ides of March, the day of his murder. Long before Julius Caesar became dictator (from 47 to 44 B.C.) and was A Revolting Development subsequently murdered, the Roman Spartacus (109-71 B.C.) was a captured Republic had entered a state of rapid soldier who was sold into slavery to be a decline. The rich had become wealthier and gladiator. But he escaped his captors and more powerful as a result of Rome’s many formed an army of rebel slaves. Against military successes. great odds, Spartacus’s slave army defeated Meanwhile, life for the average Roman two Roman battalions. seemed to be getting worse. Attempts to Spartacus wanted to leave Italy, but his Ancient: Elementary Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Page 318 army and supporters of the slave revolt Over time, however, the triumvirate urged him to attack Rome. A Roman army broke down. Crassus was killed in battle, led by Crassus finally defeated Spartacus and Pompey began entertaining ideas of and his men. ruling without the dangerously popular Over 5,000 men from Spartacus’s army Caesar. While Caesar was fighting in Gaul were crucified along Rome’s main road, the (modern-day France), Pompey and the Appian Way, as a warning to other slaves Senate ordered Caesar to return to Rome not to revolt. without his army. But when Caesar crossed Finally, a new practice developed in the Rubicon River in northern Italy, he which the army was paid with gold and land. brought his army with him in defiance of the Soldiers no longer fought for the good of the Senate’s order. This fateful decision led to a Republic but fought instead for tangible civil war. Caesar defeated Pompey’s forces rewards. Gradually, soldiers became more and entered Rome in 46 B.C., triumphant loyal to the generals who could pay them and unchallenged. than to the Roman Republic itself. It was Upon his return, Caesar made himself within this changing atmosphere that dictator and absolute ruler of Rome and its military leaders such as Julius Caesar were territories. During his rule, he enacted able to seize control of and put an end to the several reforms. Caesar founded many Roman Republic. colonies in newly conquered territories and Julius Caesar was a man of many talents. provided land and opportunity for poor Born into the patrician class, Caesar was Romans who chose to migrate there. He intelligent, educated, and cultivated. An reduced the number of slaves and opened excellent speaker, he possessed a sharp citizenship up to people living in the sense of humor, charm, and personality. All provinces. Finally, he created a new of these traits combined helped make him a calendar named the Julian calendar. This skilled politician. very calendar, with a few minor Moreover, Caesar was a military genius. adjustments, is the same one used around His many successful military campaigns the world today. gained him broad support and popularity In 44 B.C., Julius Caesar ordered the among the common people. Caesar also Senate to make him dictator for life. won the undying loyalty of his soldiers, who Typically, dictators served for a limited time supplied him with the necessary muscle to (usually six months), then stepped down. seize power. Caesar’s actions threatened to end the Julius Caesar began his rise to power in Republic once and for all. Fearing this 60 B.C. by forging an alliance with another change, a group of senators plotted and general, Pompey, and a wealthy patrician, executed the murder of Caesar on the Ides Crassus. Together, these three men of March. Although the senators succeeded assumed control of the Roman Republic, in ending Caesar’s life, they did not realize and Caesar was thrust into the position of at that time that the Republic had died with consul. Historians have since dubbed the him. period of rule by these three men the First Rome would now become an empire. Triumvirate. Ancient: Elementary Unit 24: A Roman Dictator Page 319 Timeline for General Gaius Julius Caesar (100-44 B.C.) 100 Born in Rome 84 Marries Cornelia, daughter of the powerful consul Cinna 75 Captured and ransomed by Mediterranean pirates. After his release, Caesar fulfills his promise to crucify the pirates. 67 Marries Pompeia after Cornelia’s death 63 Elected Pontifex Maximus (High Priest) 61 Becomes governor of Spain 60 Forms triumvirate with Crassus and Pompey 59 Elected consul 58 Becomes governor of Gaul 53 Crassus killed at Battle of Carrhae in Mesopotamia 49 Caesar and his army cross the Rubicon into Italy, sparking civil war. 48 Pompey murdered in Egypt; Caesar has affair with Cleopatra and makes her queen of Egypt.
Recommended publications
  • The Electronic Passport to Ancient Rome
    The Electronic Passport to Ancient Rome A New Power Rises decreed that each brother would The earliest empires had been in the east. build a city, but Romulus’ city Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, India, and Greece were would be much larger. Romulus all home to at least one powerful civilization. completed his city on April 21, 753BC. Remus was upset that Romulus had built his city, so he climbed About 387BC, a city on the Italian peninsula began acquiring land and building an empire. That city over the wall. The enraged Romulus killed his was Rome. For more than one thousand years, brother with an ax. The city came to be known as Rome controlled the western world. Rome, named for its legendary founder. Rome grew into an empire in part because of The early Romans lived in small how it treated the people it conquered. If a city was communities that grew into city-states, often ruled defeated by another empire, its citizens were forced by kings from wealthy families. About fifty years from the land if they were after Romulus founded the city, the legends say the lucky, and enslaved if Etruscans conquered the Romans. they were not. Initially, The Etruscans were brutal rulers who rained the Romans extended the terror on the Roman people. They were eventually rights of citizenship to the ousted by a group of Roman aristocrats who people they conquered. Rome founded the Roman Republic. conquered many of its allies by force, but once the new people became The Patricians and the Plebeians citizens, they often joined the Roman The patricians were the noble families of army.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective on the Early Roman Dictatorship, 501-300 B.C
    A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. BY Jeffrey A. Easton Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts. Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Committee Members Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date defended: April 26, 2010 The Thesis Committee for Jeffrey A. Easton certifies that this is the approved Version of the following thesis: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. Committee: Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date approved: April 27, 2010 ii Page left intentionally blank. iii ABSTRACT According to sources writing during the late Republic, Roman dictators exercised supreme authority over all other magistrates in the Roman polity for the duration of their term. Modern scholars have followed this traditional paradigm. A close reading of narratives describing early dictatorships and an analysis of ancient epigraphic evidence, however, reveal inconsistencies in the traditional model. The purpose of this thesis is to introduce a new model of the early Roman dictatorship that is based upon a reexamination of the evidence for the nature of dictatorial imperium and the relationship between consuls and dictators in the period 501-300 BC. Originally, dictators functioned as ad hoc magistrates, were equipped with standard consular imperium, and, above all, were intended to supplement consuls. Furthermore, I demonstrate that Sulla’s dictatorship, a new and genuinely absolute form of the office introduced in the 80s BC, inspired subsequent late Republican perceptions of an autocratic dictatorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussolini's Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità
    “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità Benjamin Barron Senior Honors Thesis in History HIST-409-02 Georgetown University Mentored by Professor Foss May 4, 2009 “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgments ii List of Illustrations iii Introduction 1 I. Mussolini and the Power of Words 7 II. The Restrained Side of Mussolini’s Romanità 28 III. The Shift to Imperialism: The Second Italo-Ethiopian War 1935 – 1936 49 IV. Romanità in Mussolini’s New Roman Empire 58 Conclusion 90 Bibliography 95 i PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first came up with the topic for this thesis when I visited Rome for the first time in March of 2008. I was studying abroad for the spring semester in Milan, and my six-month experience in Italy undoubtedly influenced the outcome of this thesis. In Milan, I grew to love everything about Italy – the language, the culture, the food, the people, and the history. During this time, I traveled throughout all of Italian peninsula and, without the support of my parents, this tremendous experience would not have been possible. For that, I thank them sincerely. This thesis would not have been possible without a few others whom I would like to thank. First and foremost, thank you, Professor Astarita, for all the time you put into our Honors Seminar class during the semester. I cannot imagine how hard it must have been to read all of our drafts so intently. Your effort has not gone unnoticed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History, Rome
    4rome.qxd 4/14/04 2:33 AM Page 125 Ancient Rome Lesson 11 Rome: Republic to Empire OBJECTIVES Overview This lesson traces the history of Rome from its founding Students will be able to: myths through its kings, the republic, and the end of the republic. First, students hold a discussion on what a dictator • Explain the founding is. Then they read and discuss an article on the beginning of myths of Rome. Rome, the Roman Republic, and its transformation into an • Identify Cincinnatus, empire. Finally, in small groups, students role play members Julius Caesar, Cicero, and of a congressional committee deciding on whether the U.S. Augustus. Constitution should be amended to give the president greater • Describe the government powers in an emergency. of the Roman Republic, the checks on it, and its use of dictators. • Express a reasoned opin- STANDARDS ADDRESSED ion on whether the United States should adopt an California History–Social Science Standard 6.7: Students amendment to grant the analyze the geographic, political, economic, religious, president greater powers and social structures during the development of Rome. in an emergency. (1) Identify the location and describe the rise of the Roman Republic, including the importance of such mythi- cal and historical figures as Aeneas, Romulus and Remus, PREPARATION Cincinnatus, Julius Caesar, and Cicero. (2) Describe the government of the Roman Republic and its significance Handout 11A: Timeline of (e.g., written constitution and tripartite government, Ancient Rome—1 per student checks and balances, civic duty). Handout 11B: Map of the (4) Discuss the influence of Julius Caesar and Augustus in Roman Empire—1 per student Rome’s transition from republic to empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Republic ROME's GOVERNMENT P.269 COMPARE
    Name ____KEY_____________________P#____HR____________ Section 2: The Roman Republic ROME’S GOVERNMENT p.269 MAIN IDEA: Rome’s republic was shaped by a _struggle_ between wealthy _landowners_ and regular _citizens_______ as it gradually expanded the right to __vote___. COMPARE / CONTRAST Early Rome was divided into 2 classes Patricians – wealthy landowners or nobles Plebeians – artisans, shopkeepers, owners of small farms Rome’s ruling class Lower class Could not hold office Most of Rome’s people Both -considered citizens -had to pay taxes -served in the army -had the right to vote -could not marry people in different class HOW DID ROME’S GOVERNMENT WORK? p.269-270 Tripartite – 3 part government Who? ONLY patrician men Checks and Balances – no group has too much power = 3 part gov. 1._Ran the government_ 2._Made Laws_________ 3._Acted as Judges___ Consuls: top government Senate: most important Praetors: officials; 2 patricians chosen a lawmaking body year -interpret laws Who? 300 patrician men -act as judges in court Jobs of each 1.-headed the army What did they do? -gave advise to consuls -200s B.C. proposed laws, held 2.-ran the government debates, & approved building programs Term: 1 year Term: Life Veto: reject other’s decisions Assembly of Centuries: -elected consuls & praetors -passed laws PLEBEIANS AGAINST PATRICIANS p.270-271 Why were the Plebeians upset with the Patricians? After they fought in the army and paid taxes to support the Roman Republic, they wanted to have more of a say. How did the Plebeians take action? What did they do? 494 B.C. – Plebeians went on strike They refused to serve in the army They left the city to set up their own republic Were the Plebeians actions effective? YES What was the outcome? Patricians agreed to share power; needed plebeians to serve in their army Council of the Plebs – 471 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015Burden-Strevensphd.Pdf
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Burden-Strevens, C. W. (2015) Cassius Dio's Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Glasgow. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/63189/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic Christopher Burden-Strevens Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow st October 1 , 2015 © Christopher Burden-Strevens, 01/10/2015 Abstract: Dio’s Speeches & the Collapse of the Roman Republic This thesis argues that Cassius Dio used his speeches of his Late Republican and Augustan narratives as a means of historical explanation.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Dictatorial Authority Did Good, and Not Harm, to the Roman Republic Dictatorship and Constitutional Change in Machiavelli De Wilde, M
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Why Dictatorial Authority Did Good, and not Harm, to the Roman Republic Dictatorship and Constitutional Change in Machiavelli de Wilde, M. DOI 10.1111/raju.12194 Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Published in Ratio Juris License Article 25fa Dutch Copyright Act Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): de Wilde, M. (2018). Why Dictatorial Authority Did Good, and not Harm, to the Roman Republic: Dictatorship and Constitutional Change in Machiavelli. Ratio Juris, 31(1), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12194 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 Ratio Juris. Vol. 31 No. 1 March 2018 (86–99) NOTES • DISCUSSIONS • BOOK REVIEWS Why Dictatorial Authority Did Good, and not Harm, to the Roman Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: the Rise of Rome
    254-257 UO3-824133 4/3/04 4:07 PM Page 254 New Empires and New Faiths Each civilization that you will study in this unit made important contributions to history. • The Romans invented concrete and used the arch in building. • The Christians helped shape the West’s religious beliefs. • The Muslims spread the religion of Islam and invented algebra. 500 B..C.. 100 100 B..C.. AncientAncient 509 B.C. 312 B.C. 146 B.C. 44 B.C. RomeRome Rome Romans Rome Julius Caesar becomes a build destroys is killed Cha 9 pters 8 & republic the Carthage Appian Wall painting of a young couple of Way ancient Rome Rise of Rise of c. A.D.30 c. A.D. 100 ChristianityChristianity Jesus preaches Churches founded Chapter 10 in Galilee and throughout Roman Judaea world St. Matthew IslamicIslamic Civilization Chapter 11 Islamic prayer rug 254 (l)Cott Nero DIV f.25v Portrait of St. Matthew/British Library, London/Bridgeman Art Library, (tr)Scala/Art Resource, NY, (br)Ancient Art & Architecture Collection 254-257 UO3-824133 8/3/04 5:29 PM Page 255 N 0° 30°E 0° 30°E N W E Chapters 8 & 9 S W E Chapter 10 Chapter 11 S 60°N 60°N 60°N EUROPE EUROPE Caspian Caspian Sea Caspian Sea EUROPE Sea Black Sea Black Sea Black Sea T T T i i i g g g r r r E i E i E i up s up s up s h R h R h R . ra . ra . ra . R t t t e e e s 30°N s 30°N s 30°N s u R R R d .
    [Show full text]
  • Lex Licinia Sextia
    Lex Licinia Sextia For other Licinian laws, see Licinia (disambiguation). diers engaged in the siege of Velitrae, the voting on the bills had to be postponed. Gaius Licinius and Lucius Sex- tius proposed a fourth bill regarding the sacred Sibylline The Lex Licinia Sextia, also known as the Licinian Ro- [1] gations, was a series of laws proposed by the tribunes of Books. the plebs, Lucius Sextius Lateranus and Gaius Licinius In 368 BC the Roman troops came back from Velitrae. Stolo. These laws provided for a limit on the interest rate As the controversy dragged and given that with the return of loans and a restriction on private ownership of land. of the troops voting could be carried out, the patrician A third law, which provided for one of the two consuls senate appointed Marcus Furius Camillus as dictator (a to be a plebeian, was rejected. Two of these laws were head of state with extraordinary powers appointed for a passed in 368 BC, after the two proponents had been term of six months at times of crisis), who strongly op- elected and re-elected tribunes for nine consecutive years posed the bills and threatened the use of violence. How- and had successfully prevented the election of patrician ever, he had to resign for unclear reasons. The plebeian magistrates for five years (375-370 BC). In 367 BC, dur- tribunes put the bills to the vote of the Plebeian Coun- ing their tenth tribunate, this law was passed. In the same cil (the assembly of the plebeians). The bills on land and year they also proposed a fourth law regarding the priests debt were passed, but the one on plebeian consuls was who were the custodians of the sacred Sibylline Books.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republican Imperatorial Salutation
    THE REPUBLICAN IMPERATORIAL SALUTATION THE ROMAN REPUBLICAN IMPERATORIAL SALUTATION: HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT BY MICHAEL OSTROFF, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Michael Ostroff, September 2016 McMaster Universty MASTER OF ARTS (2016) Hamilton, Ontario (Classics) TITLE: The Roman Republican Imperatorial Salutation: History and Development AUTHOR: Michael Ostroff SUPERVISOR: Professor C. Eilers NUMBER OF PAGES: vi, 87 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Prof. Eilers for supervising my thesis and steering my disordered thoughts throughout the process of writing this work. I would also like to thank Prof. George and Prof. Pope for their helpful and thoughtful criticism and commentary on my thesis as members of my committee. Finally, I would like to thank Prof. Corner. Without his help and guidance, I would never have been able to make it through this program. iii Abstract The Roman Republican imperatorial salutation was an influential ritual during the late Republican period. This ritual has received little attention over the last 50 years since Robert Combes released his now seminal book on the title of imperator. In this thesis, I argue for why multiple of the topics covered in that book require a re-examination, in particular the arguments surrounding the possible first salutations. This encompasses a thorough examination of the potential salutation of Quinctius Poenus, Combes’ arguments concerning the salutation of Scipio Africanus, and my own theory as to who the recipient of this ritual acclamation was. This thesis covers the second century BCE and how the socio-economic, political, and military changes of that period were reflected in the growth and increasing popularity of the imperatorial salutation.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective on the Early Roman Dictatorship, 501-300 B.C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KU ScholarWorks A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. BY Jeffrey A. Easton Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts. Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Committee Members Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date defended: April 26, 2010 The Thesis Committee for Jeffrey A. Easton certifies that this is the approved Version of the following thesis: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. Committee: Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date approved: April 27, 2010 ii Page left intentionally blank. iii ABSTRACT According to sources writing during the late Republic, Roman dictators exercised supreme authority over all other magistrates in the Roman polity for the duration of their term. Modern scholars have followed this traditional paradigm. A close reading of narratives describing early dictatorships and an analysis of ancient epigraphic evidence, however, reveal inconsistencies in the traditional model. The purpose of this thesis is to introduce a new model of the early Roman dictatorship that is based upon a reexamination of the evidence for the nature of dictatorial imperium and the relationship between consuls and dictators in the period 501-300 BC. Originally, dictators functioned as ad hoc magistrates, were equipped with standard consular imperium, and, above all, were intended to supplement consuls. Furthermore, I demonstrate that Sulla’s dictatorship, a new and genuinely absolute form of the office introduced in the 80s BC, inspired subsequent late Republican perceptions of an autocratic dictatorship.
    [Show full text]