DOCSLIB.ORG

2015Burden-Strevensphd.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015Burden-Strevensphd.Pdf Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Burden-Strevens, C. W. (2015) Cassius Dio's Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Glasgow. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/63189/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic Christopher Burden-Strevens Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow st October 1 , 2015 © Christopher Burden-Strevens, 01/10/2015 Abstract: Dio’s Speeches & the Collapse of the Roman Republic This thesis argues that Cassius Dio used his speeches of his Late Republican and Augustan narratives as a means of historical explanation. I suggest that the interpretative framework which the historian applied to the causes and success of constitutional change can be most clearly identified in the speeches. The discussion is divided into eight chapters over two sections. Chapter 1 (Introduction) sets out the historical, paideutic, and compositional issues which have traditionally served as a basis for rejecting the explanatory and interpretative value of the ὅὂἷἷἵhἷὅΝiὀΝϊiὁ’ὅΝwὁὄkΝaὀἶΝἸὁὄΝἵὄitiἵiὅiὀgΝhiὅΝRoman History more generally. Section 1 consists of three methodological chapters which respond to these issues. In Chapter 2 (Speeches and Sources) I arguἷΝthatΝϊiὁ’ὅΝprosopopoeiai approximate more closely with the political oratory of that period than has traditionally been recognised. Chapter 3 (Dio and the Sophistic) argues that Cassius Dio viewed the artifice of rhetoric as a particular danger in his own time. I demonstrate that this preoccupation informed, credibly, his presentation of political oratory in the Late Republic and of its destructive consequences. Chapter 4 (Dio and the Progymnasmata) argues that although the texts of the progymnasmata in which Dio will have been educated clearly encouraged invention with a strongly moralising focus, it is precisely his reliance on these aspects of rhetorical education which would have rendered his interpretations persuasive to a contemporary audience. Section 2 is formed of three case-studies. In Chapter 5 (The Defence of the Republic) I explore how Dio placed speeches-in-character at three Republican constitutional crises to set out an imagined case for the preservation of that system. This case, I argue, is deliberately unconvincing: the historian uses these to elaborate the problems of the distribution of power and the noxious influence of and . Chapter 6 (The Enemies of the Republic) examines the ἷxὂlaὀatὁὄyΝὄὁlἷΝὁἸΝϊiὁ’ὅΝὅὂἷἷἵhἷὅΝ fromΝthἷΝὁὂὂὁὅitἷΝὂἷὄὅὂἷἵtivἷέΝItΝiὀvἷὅtigatἷὅΝϊiὁ’ὅΝὂlaἵἷmἷὀtΝὁἸΝdishonest speech into the mouths of military figures to make his own distinctive argument about the role of imperialism in the fragmentation of the res publica. Chapter 7 (Speech after the Settlement) argues that Cassius Dio used his three speeches of the Augustan age to demonstrate how a distinctive combination of Augustan virtues directly counteracted the negative aspects of Republican political and rhetorical culture which the previous two case-studies had explored. Iὀἶἷἷἶ,Ν iὀΝ ϊiὁ’ὅΝ aἵἵὁuὀtΝ ὁἸΝ χuguὅtuὅΝ thἷΝ ἸailuὄἷὅΝ ὁἸΝ thἷΝ res publica are reinvented as positive forces which work in concert with Augustan to secure beneficial constitutional change. © Christopher Burden-Strevens, 01/10/2015 3 Acknowledgements ‘This was not, like the fabled Goddess of Wisdom, the offspring of a single brain. It ought to be regarded as the work of many heads and many hands.’ James Madison, March 10th 1834 I would not dream of comparing this thesis to an undertaking as momentous as the United States Constitution must have been, even if the process of writing it has at times felt comparably exhausting. However, this thesis would never even have been started without the support and contribution of many other heads and hands. The thanks I extend here do not match up to their input, but I will try my best. I cannot begin to express my gratitude to my supervisors, Catherine Steel and Henriette van der Blom. I would not have wanted to supervise me as I first arrived, a rather shambolic 22-year-old graduate. I owe to them the inspiration for the methodological ἵhaὂtἷὄὅΝὁἸΝthiὅΝthἷὅiὅμΝitΝwaὅΝthἷyΝwhὁΝuὀἶἷὄliὀἷἶΝthἷΝimὂὁὄtaὀἵἷΝὁἸΝϊiὁ’ὅΝἷἶuἵatiὁὀΝaὀἶΝ his relationship with his time and sources. For the case-studies, their expertise in the Late Republic has been invaluable. But this is not comparable to the debt I owe them for their patience and support in the herculean (but happily not sisyphean) task of turning me into an efficient and organised human being. I would have been unable to put this thesis together without the support of my colleagues. Within Glasgow, I am grateful above all to Lisa Hau. She has been an endless source of encouragement and friendship in research and teaching. Outwith Glasgow, I am particularly grateful to Adam Kemezis, Christopher Mallan, Brandon Jones, and William Rees, whose research in recent years on Cassius Dio has been of enormous help. The stimulating discussion and kind encouragement of John Rich, Christa Grey, Jen Hilder, Saskia Roselaar, Roman Frolov, Jesper Madsen, Carsten Lange, Zara Chadha, and Elena Giusti has furthermore been invaluable. Particular thanks are also due to Luke Pitcher for his meticulous and invaluable corrections to this thesis above and beyond the call of duty. Above all, I thank my family for persevering in the unenviable Burden of supporting me in the classics. It is only thanks to the huge sacrifices made by my father that I was able to enter my degree and my doctorate. He is the intellectual model of my life; I would be lost without him. I am blessed for my mother and her limitless understanding when faced with my cancellations of our weekly catch-ups. And for my grandmother, Valerie, I cannot write the words. Finally, thank you, Duncan, for putting up with me. 4 Note on Texts and Translations For my primary source of Cassius ϊiὁΝIΝhavἷΝuὅἷἶΝἑaὄy’ὅΝ1λ1ἂ-1927 LCL edition of the text, and have preferred his book-numberings ὁvἷὄΝthὁὅἷΝὁἸΝἐὁiὅὅἷvaiὀ’ὅΝ1ἆλἆΝἷἶitiὁὀΝaὀἶΝ those of earlier scholars. However, for books 72-80 of the history, I have placed the book- ὀumἴἷὄΝὁἸΝἐὁiὅὅἷvaiὀ’ὅΝἷἶitiὁὀΝaἸtἷὄΝἑaὄἷy’ὅΝὀumἴἷὄiὀgΝiὀΝὅὃuaὄἷΝἴὄaἵkἷtὅΝ(ἷέgέΝἑaὅὅέΝϊiὁέΝ 73[72].1.1). All Cassius Dio fragments are taken from the first two of the nine LCL vὁlumἷὅΝaὀἶΝaὄἷΝἶἷὀὁtἷἶΝἴyΝ‘ἔ’ΝἸὁllὁwἷἶΝἴyΝἑaὄἷy’ὅΝἸὄagmἷὀtΝaὀἶΝὅἷἵtiὁὀΝὀumἴἷὄΝ(ἷέgέΝ Cass. Dio. F 2.4). All translations of Dio are my own unless otherwise indicated. For the progymnasmata of Aelius Theon, pseudo-Hermogenes, Aphthonius, and Nicolaus, IΝ havἷΝ uὅἷἶΝ ἕέΝ χέΝ Kἷὀὀἷἶy’ὅΝ Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric, Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta, 2003. In all cases I have preferred to use his translation. Chapter- and section-ὀumἴἷὄὅΝ ἸὁὄΝ χἷliuὅΝ ἦhἷὁὀ’ὅΝ progymnasmata aὄἷΝ thὁὅἷΝ ἵὁὀtaiὀἷἶΝ withiὀΝ Kἷὀὀἷἶy’ὅΝ ἀίίἁΝ ἷἶitiὁὀ,Ν aὀἶΝ ὀὁtΝ thὁὅἷΝ ὁἸΝ ἥὂἷὀgἷl’ὅΝ Rhetores Graeci. For the treatise of pseduo-Hermogenes I have followed Kἷὀὀἷἶy’ὅΝὂὄaἵtiἵἷΝaὀἶΝuὅἷἶΝthἷΝὂagἷ-ὀumἴἷὄὅΝὁἸΝἤaἴἷ’ὅΝHermogenis Opera. For that of Aphthonius I have used the page-ὀumἴἷὄὅΝ ὁἸΝ ἤaἴἷ’ὅΝ Aphthonii Progymnasmata and of ἥὂἷὀgἷl’ὅΝ Rhetores Graeci iὀtἷὄἵhaὀgἷaἴly,Ν aὅΝ ἶὁἷὅΝ KἷὀὀἷἶyέΝ ἔὁὄΝἠiἵὁlauὅ’ΝtἷxtΝ IΝhavἷΝ used the page-ὀumἴἷὄὅΝ ὁἸΝ ἔἷltἷὀ’ὅΝ Nicolai Progymnasmata, again as followed in Kἷὀὀἷἶy’ὅΝἀίίἁΝἷἶitiὁὀέΝ ἔὁὄΝ ἢhilὁὅtὄatuὅ’Ν Vitae Sophistarum IΝ havἷΝ uὅἷἶΝ Wὄight’ὅΝ 1λἀ1Ν LCL edition, but translations of this text are my own unless otherwise indicated. For his Vita Apollonii I have used the first two of three volumes oἸΝἑέΝἢέΝJὁὀἷὅ’ΝὀἷwΝἀίίἃ-2006 LCL edition, again preferring my own translations. Translations into English of French, German, and Italian scholarship are my own, usually with important points of translation preserved in italics in the body of the translation or in the corresponding footnote. All other book, section, and chapter numbers are taken from the LCL edition of each author and quotations of these are my own translation unless otherwise specified. 5 List of Abbreviations Aphth. Aphthonius Prog. Progymnasmata App. Appian BC Bellum Civile Gall. Gallica Mith. Mithridatica Apul. Apuleius Ap. Apologia As. Asinius Aureus Flor. Florida Arist. Aristotle NE Ethica Nicomachea Pol. Politica Rhet. Rhetorica [Arist.] pseudo-Aristotle Rh. Al. Rhetorica ad Alexandrum Aristid. Aristides Or. Orationes Aug. Augustus RG Res Gestae Divi Augusti Caes. Julius Caesar BC De Bello Civile BG De Bello Gallico Cass. Dio. Cassius Dio Historia Romana Cic. Cicero Att.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Electronic Passport to Ancient Rome
    The Electronic Passport to Ancient Rome A New Power Rises decreed that each brother would The earliest empires had been in the east. build a city, but Romulus’ city Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, India, and Greece were would be much larger. Romulus all home to at least one powerful civilization. completed his city on April 21, 753BC. Remus was upset that Romulus had built his city, so he climbed About 387BC, a city on the Italian peninsula began acquiring land and building an empire. That city over the wall. The enraged Romulus killed his was Rome. For more than one thousand years, brother with an ax. The city came to be known as Rome controlled the western world. Rome, named for its legendary founder. Rome grew into an empire in part because of The early Romans lived in small how it treated the people it conquered. If a city was communities that grew into city-states, often ruled defeated by another empire, its citizens were forced by kings from wealthy families. About fifty years from the land if they were after Romulus founded the city, the legends say the lucky, and enslaved if Etruscans conquered the Romans. they were not. Initially, The Etruscans were brutal rulers who rained the Romans extended the terror on the Roman people. They were eventually rights of citizenship to the ousted by a group of Roman aristocrats who people they conquered. Rome founded the Roman Republic. conquered many of its allies by force, but once the new people became The Patricians and the Plebeians citizens, they often joined the Roman The patricians were the noble families of army.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective on the Early Roman Dictatorship, 501-300 B.C
    A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. BY Jeffrey A. Easton Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts. Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Committee Members Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date defended: April 26, 2010 The Thesis Committee for Jeffrey A. Easton certifies that this is the approved Version of the following thesis: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. Committee: Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date approved: April 27, 2010 ii Page left intentionally blank. iii ABSTRACT According to sources writing during the late Republic, Roman dictators exercised supreme authority over all other magistrates in the Roman polity for the duration of their term. Modern scholars have followed this traditional paradigm. A close reading of narratives describing early dictatorships and an analysis of ancient epigraphic evidence, however, reveal inconsistencies in the traditional model. The purpose of this thesis is to introduce a new model of the early Roman dictatorship that is based upon a reexamination of the evidence for the nature of dictatorial imperium and the relationship between consuls and dictators in the period 501-300 BC. Originally, dictators functioned as ad hoc magistrates, were equipped with standard consular imperium, and, above all, were intended to supplement consuls. Furthermore, I demonstrate that Sulla’s dictatorship, a new and genuinely absolute form of the office introduced in the 80s BC, inspired subsequent late Republican perceptions of an autocratic dictatorship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussolini's Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità
    “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità Benjamin Barron Senior Honors Thesis in History HIST-409-02 Georgetown University Mentored by Professor Foss May 4, 2009 “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgments ii List of Illustrations iii Introduction 1 I. Mussolini and the Power of Words 7 II. The Restrained Side of Mussolini’s Romanità 28 III. The Shift to Imperialism: The Second Italo-Ethiopian War 1935 – 1936 49 IV. Romanità in Mussolini’s New Roman Empire 58 Conclusion 90 Bibliography 95 i PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first came up with the topic for this thesis when I visited Rome for the first time in March of 2008. I was studying abroad for the spring semester in Milan, and my six-month experience in Italy undoubtedly influenced the outcome of this thesis. In Milan, I grew to love everything about Italy – the language, the culture, the food, the people, and the history. During this time, I traveled throughout all of Italian peninsula and, without the support of my parents, this tremendous experience would not have been possible. For that, I thank them sincerely. This thesis would not have been possible without a few others whom I would like to thank. First and foremost, thank you, Professor Astarita, for all the time you put into our Honors Seminar class during the semester. I cannot imagine how hard it must have been to read all of our drafts so intently. Your effort has not gone unnoticed.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompeii and Herculaneum: a Sourcebook Allows Readers to Form a Richer and More Diverse Picture of Urban Life on the Bay of Naples
    POMPEII AND HERCULANEUM The original edition of Pompeii: A Sourcebook was a crucial resource for students of the site. Now updated to include material from Herculaneum, the neighbouring town also buried in the eruption of Vesuvius, Pompeii and Herculaneum: A Sourcebook allows readers to form a richer and more diverse picture of urban life on the Bay of Naples. Focusing upon inscriptions and ancient texts, it translates and sets into context a representative sample of the huge range of source material uncovered in these towns. From the labels on wine jars to scribbled insults, and from advertisements for gladiatorial contests to love poetry, the individual chapters explore the early history of Pompeii and Herculaneum, their destruction, leisure pursuits, politics, commerce, religion, the family and society. Information about Pompeii and Herculaneum from authors based in Rome is included, but the great majority of sources come from the cities themselves, written by their ordinary inhabitants – men and women, citizens and slaves. Incorporating the latest research and finds from the two cities and enhanced with more photographs, maps and plans, Pompeii and Herculaneum: A Sourcebook offers an invaluable resource for anyone studying or visiting the sites. Alison E. Cooley is Reader in Classics and Ancient History at the University of Warwick. Her recent publications include Pompeii. An Archaeological Site History (2003), a translation, edition and commentary of the Res Gestae Divi Augusti (2009), and The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy (2012). M.G.L. Cooley teaches Classics and is Head of Scholars at Warwick School. He is Chairman and General Editor of the LACTOR sourcebooks, and has edited three volumes in the series: The Age of Augustus (2003), Cicero’s Consulship Campaign (2009) and Tiberius to Nero (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History, Rome
    4rome.qxd 4/14/04 2:33 AM Page 125 Ancient Rome Lesson 11 Rome: Republic to Empire OBJECTIVES Overview This lesson traces the history of Rome from its founding Students will be able to: myths through its kings, the republic, and the end of the republic. First, students hold a discussion on what a dictator • Explain the founding is. Then they read and discuss an article on the beginning of myths of Rome. Rome, the Roman Republic, and its transformation into an • Identify Cincinnatus, empire. Finally, in small groups, students role play members Julius Caesar, Cicero, and of a congressional committee deciding on whether the U.S. Augustus. Constitution should be amended to give the president greater • Describe the government powers in an emergency. of the Roman Republic, the checks on it, and its use of dictators. • Express a reasoned opin- STANDARDS ADDRESSED ion on whether the United States should adopt an California History–Social Science Standard 6.7: Students amendment to grant the analyze the geographic, political, economic, religious, president greater powers and social structures during the development of Rome. in an emergency. (1) Identify the location and describe the rise of the Roman Republic, including the importance of such mythi- cal and historical figures as Aeneas, Romulus and Remus, PREPARATION Cincinnatus, Julius Caesar, and Cicero. (2) Describe the government of the Roman Republic and its significance Handout 11A: Timeline of (e.g., written constitution and tripartite government, Ancient Rome—1 per student checks and balances, civic duty). Handout 11B: Map of the (4) Discuss the influence of Julius Caesar and Augustus in Roman Empire—1 per student Rome’s transition from republic to empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification Into Branches of Modern Legal
    THE CLASSIFICAT ION IN T O BRANCHES OF MODERN LEGAL SYS T EMS 443 Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso XXVII (Valparaíso, Chile, 2º semestre de 2006) [pp. 443 - 472] THE classiFicatiON INTO BRANCHES OF MODERN LEGAL SYSTEMS AND ROMAN laW TRADITIONS [“La clasificación en ramas de los sistemas legales modernos y las tradiciones del Derecho romano”] GÁBOR HAMZA * RESUMEN ABS T RAC T El presente trabajo se basa en la lec- This paper is based on the author’s ción inaugural del autor para su ingreso opening lesson upon his entry into the en la Academia Húngara de Ciencias; y Hungarian Academy of Sciences. He en él examina las diversas divisiones en hereby discusses the various divisions in partes o ramas de que ha sido objeto el parts or branches of the Law throughout Derecho, a través de la historia, empe- history, beginning with those formulated zando por las formuladas por los juristas by Roman jurists of public and private romanos, de Derecho público y privado y Law, and of civil and praetorian (hono- Derecho civil y pretorio (honorario). Es rary) Law. The first one has undoubte- sobre todo la primera que ha tenido una dly some influence, which the author influencia posterior, que el autor analiza analyzes among the commentators, in entre los glosadores y comentaristas, en la the humanistic judicial practice, and in jurisprudencia humanística y en diversas several later schools, with an extension escuelas de la época posterior, con exten- to Scottish law and to the common law sión al derecho escocés y al common law, and, of course in the juridical science of y desde luego en la Ciencia jurídica de the XIX and XX centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaces of Roman Constitutionalism 26-28 September 2019
    Spaces of Roman Constitutionalism 26-28 September 2019 Law, Governance and Space: Questioning the Foundations of the Republican Tradition (SpaceLaw) University of Helsinki Tieteiden talo (House of Science and Letters) Kirkkokatu 6, 00170 Helsinki Márlio Aguiar (University of São Paulo): Iurisdictio, ius dicere and ius dicentis officium in Roman legal tradition between the Republic and the Principate The word iurisdictio can be described as a basic historical concept (Geschichtliche Grundbegriff) in Roman legal and political history. It is at the same time a semantic unit that aims to explain a social phenomenon as a cognoscitive scientia or ars, and a normative concept which aims to act in social reality, concerned with the exercise of ius dicere to order the society. With the transformation and growth from the Republic to the Empire, not only the ius ciuile was marked with many changes, but 1 also the ius publicum (concerning the res publica, the princeps, the magistrates and the Roman officials) – and the iurisdictio was related with both private and public dimensions. After the lex Aebucia and the lex Plaetoria, from the mid and Late Republic until the Severan age, the Romans effectively used this concept within their own legal and cultural tradition of continuous modification of past concepts. The Romans later forged the nominalized form of the word that expressed the characteristics, symbols and acts of the “ius dicere”: praetors, aediles, the princeps, prases provinciarum, praefecti (and many of their legati) were all invested with some kind of iurisdictio, the ius dicentis officium (Ulp. D.2.1.1). The iurisdictio also played a large role in Roman legal history by its function in Roman civil procedure as the main function of the iudex appointed by the magistrate in the in iure stage for the trial in the stage apud iudicem.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans on Parade: Representations of Romanness in the Triumph
    ROMANS ON PARADE: REPRESENTATIONS OF ROMANNESS IN THE TRIUMPH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfullment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Amber D. Lunsford, B.A., M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Erik Gunderson, Adviser Professor William Batstone Adviser Professor Victoria Wohl Department of Greek and Latin Copyright by Amber Dawn Lunsford 2004 ABSTRACT We find in the Roman triumph one of the most dazzling examples of the theme of spectacle in Roman culture. The triumph, though, was much more than a parade thrown in honor of a conquering general. Nearly every aspect of this tribute has the feel of theatricality. Even the fact that it was not voluntarily bestowed upon a general has characteristics of a spectacle. One must work to present oneself as worthy of a triumph in order to gain one; military victories alone are not enough. Looking at the machinations behind being granted a triumph may possibly lead to a better understanding of how important self-representation was to the Romans. The triumph itself is, quite obviously, a spectacle. However, within the triumph, smaller and more intricate spectacles are staged. The Roman audience, the captured people and spoils, and the triumphant general himself are all intermeshed into a complex web of spectacle and spectator. Not only is the triumph itself a spectacle of a victorious general, but it also contains sub-spectacles, which, when analyzed, may give us clues as to how the Romans looked upon non-Romans and, in turn, how they saw themselves in relation to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Jennifer Gerrish University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Gerrish, Jennifer, "Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 511. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Abstract This dissertation explores echoes of the triumviral period in Sallust's Histories and demonstrates how, through analogical historiography, Sallust presents himself as a new type of historian whose "exempla" are flawed and morally ambiguous, and who rejects the notion of a triumphant, ascendant Rome perpetuated by the triumvirs. Just as Sallust's unusual prose style is calculated to shake his reader out of complacency and force critical engagement with the reading process, his analogical historiography requires the reader to work through multiple layers of interpretation to reach the core arguments. In the De Legibus, Cicero lamented the lack of great Roman historians, and frequently implied that he might take up the task himself. He had a clear sense of what history ought to be : encomiastic and exemplary, reflecting a conception of Roman history as a triumphant story populated by glorious protagonists. In Sallust's view, however, the novel political circumstances of the triumviral period called for a new type of historiography. To create a portrait of moral clarity is, Sallust suggests, ineffective, because Romans have been too corrupted by ambitio and avaritia to follow the good examples of the past.
    [Show full text]