DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

471 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Western Central C-31 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, centre-ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, centro-occidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Highwaterman catfish Hypophthalmus edentatus 13 ... ... ... ... 44 50 49 American eel Anguilla rostrata 22 17 11 13 13 27 52 163 American shad Alosa sapidissima 24 103 145 149 155 148 169 202 Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus 24 0 0 - - - - - Hickory shad Alosa mediocris 24 - - - - 22 - - American gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum 24 ... ... ... ... 10 ... ... Yellowfin river pellona Pellona flavipinnis 24 ... ... ... ... 35 40 40 Striped bass Morone saxatilis 25 99 18 14 9 4 7 9 White perch Morone americana 25 ... ... ... ... 1 ... ... Tonguefishes Cynoglossidae 31 - - 4 25 - - - Summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus 31 8 9 8 7 4 - 2 Bastard halibuts nei Paralichthys spp 31 334 399 379 468 444 398 434 Flatfishes nei Pleuronectiformes 31 428 396 339 263 257 3 330 332 White hake Urophycis tenuis 32 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 Gadiformes nei Gadiformes 32 2 2 1 3 1 1 286 Ladyfish Elops saurus 33 1 259 1 224 974 660 571 973 955 Tarpon Megalops atlanticus 33 137 53 71 73 59 83 219 Bonefish Albula vulpes 33 16 51 40 35 32 34 164 Sea catfishes nei Ariidae 33 21 953 14 483 9 997 6 615 6 560 5 301 4 454 Squirrelfishes nei Holocentridae 33 100 175 150 117 168 129 437 Flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus 33 8 973 10 745 8 008 7 362 6 402 5 230 5 697 Lebranche mullet Mugil liza 33 1 893 2 006 1 973 2 085 2 131 1 270 1 323 White mullet Mugil curema 33 3 152 3 291 4 231 3 660 3 018 3 555 3 342 Parassi mullet Mugil incilis 33 13 40 80 22 82 90 87 Bobo mullet Joturus pichardi 33 6 6 6 10 7 9 234 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 4 513 6 285 4 640 5 389 5 863 5 718 7 006 Common snook Centropomus undecimalis 33 1 341 1 841 2 138 1 495 1 547 935 986 Snooks(=Robalos) nei Centropomus spp 33 5 348 5 499 5 537 5 256 4 440 5 317 5 100 Gag Mycteroperca microlepis 33 12 8 13 9 9 3 2 Scamp Mycteroperca phenax 33 23 18 23 28 25 16 13 Yellowfin grouper Mycteroperca venenosa 33 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Brazilian groupers nei Mycteroperca spp 33 23 24 24 30 36 37 32 Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus 33 391 386 274 245 246 161 154 Yellowedge grouper Epinephelus flavolimbatus 33 46 50 34 81 102 80 122 Red hind Epinephelus guttatus 33 234 244 245 238 218 255 159 Red grouper Epinephelus morio 33 2 196 156 88 79 85 75 Misty grouper Epinephelus mystacinus 33 6 5 5 7 4 7 4 Snowy grouper Epinephelus niveatus 33 8 7 8 12 9 8 18 Warsaw grouper Epinephelus nigritus 33 26 28 14 28 46 27 27 Groupers nei Epinephelus spp 33 8 246 6 276 6 269 7 114 6 887 5 465 5 697 Black seabass Centropristis striata 33 229 257 185 212 379 312 442 Coney Cephalopholis fulva 33 124 114 114 107 102 44 34 Groupers, seabasses nei Serranidae 33 13 324 13 144 14 668 13 588 11 894 10 606 8 346 Sand tilefish Malacanthus plumieri 33 - - - 6 3 3 4 Mutton snapper Lutjanus analis 33 30 22 21 88 71 82 15 Southern red snapper Lutjanus purpureus 33 1 124 1 316 1 773 1 881 2 628 2 844 1 818 Blackfin snapper Lutjanus buccanella 33 3 3 11 14 13 13 11 Northern red snapper Lutjanus campechanus 33 5 117 5 500 4 391 3 711 3 567 1 952 2 726 Cubera snapper Lutjanus cyanopterus 33 344 359 350 261 172 115 85 Grey snapper Lutjanus griseus 33 229 229 245 230 219 216 227 Lane snapper Lutjanus synagris 33 1 175 1 630 1 598 1 981 1 601 1 808 1 558 Silk snapper Lutjanus vivanus 33 100 73 52 91 73 77 57 Snappers nei Lutjanus spp 33 1 443 1 119 1 322 1 464 1 502 1 096 930 Yellowtail snapper Ocyurus chrysurus 33 2 954 3 773 3 546 4 441 4 869 3 837 3 353 Queen snapper Etelis oculatus 33 142 90 85 114 96 155 106 Vermilion snapper Rhomboplites aurorubens 33 4 055 3 578 3 538 3 680 3 861 2 531 2 952 Snappers, jobfishes nei Lutjanidae 33 11 879 8 989 9 133 8 505 8 590 7 120 6 781 White margate Haemulon album 33 - 15 8 9 9 - - White grunt Haemulon plumierii 33 1 664 1 738 1 044 863 881 506 248 ...A Haemulon spp 33 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 Pigfish Orthopristis chrysoptera 33 - - - 6 5 4 4 Barred grunt Conodon nobilis 33 187 195 165 238 301 299 226 Grunts, sweetlips nei Haemulidae (=Pomadasyidae) 33 10 472 7 014 7 322 7 481 7 972 5 932 6 282 Sand weakfish Cynoscion arenarius 33 29 28 38 37 40 33 30 Spotted weakfish Cynoscion nebulosus 33 475 523 317 337 387 275 270 Squeteague(=Gray weakfish) Cynoscion regalis 33 96 103 50 57 50 24 21 Weakfishes nei Cynoscion spp 33 15 858 12 085 12 313 12 794 13 292 9 661 8 593 Whitemouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri 33 3 620 2 130 2 450 2 570 2 660 1 600 1 670 Atlantic croaker Micropogonias undulatus 33 465 145 69 122 247 390 1 668 Gulf kingcroaker Menticirrhus littoralis 33 851 730 377 262 243 281 312 Black drum Pogonias cromis 33 2 147 1 994 1 992 1 809 2 208 2 107 2 453 Spot croaker Leiostomus xanthurus 33 441 432 333 269 396 186 390 Red drum Sciaenops ocellatus 33 24 5 2 - - - - Croakers, drums nei Sciaenidae 33 9 612 2 721 136 496 9 13 108 Porgies Calamus spp 33 517 584 416 339 361 335 395 Sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus 33 768 526 715 757 774 692 633 Western Atlantic seabream Archosargus rhomboidalis 33 ... ... ... 25 23 25 22 Red porgy Pagrus pagrus 33 6 6 9 11 255 208 316 Porgies, seabreams nei Sparidae 33 1 286 1 332 1 174 1 328 1 072 962 1 194 Goatfishes, red mullets nei Mullidae 33 148 170 89 134 110 236 97 Mojarras(=Silver-biddies) nei Gerres spp 33 196 251 233 296 270 247 117 Mojarras, etc. nei Gerreidae 33 2 049 2 048 1 841 1 956 2 121 2 307 2 082 Sea chubs nei Kyphosidae 33 9 3 9 20 7 6 6 Hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus 33 276 299 637 665 682 841 899 472 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Western Central C-31 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, centre-ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, centro-occidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Wrasses, hogfishes, etc. nei Labridae 33 88 25 24 150 139 342 142 Parrotfishes nei Scaridae 33 661 755 843 693 711 643 536 Angelfishes nei Pomacanthidae 33 12 15 17 8 1 6 6 Surgeonfishes nei Acanthuridae 33 338 363 326 301 247 138 173 Spadefishes nei Ephippidae 33 20 7 6 26 10 - 2 Boxfishes nei Ostraciidae 33 156 171 157 149 146 107 108 Filefishes, leatherjackets nei Monacanthidae 33 2 2 11 2 11 3 3 Triggerfishes, durgons nei Balistidae 33 432 626 507 484 519 665 595 Cusk-eels, brotulas nei Ophidiidae 34 4 1 1 - - - - Wreckfish Polyprion americanus 34 420 ... 3 - 8 63 146 Atlantic goldeneye tilefish Caulolatilus chrysops 34 - - - - 12 28 9 Great Northern tilefish Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps 34 171 433 381 405 416 284 275 Tilefishes nei Branchiostegidae 34 319 13 11 23 42 32 96 Tripletail Lobotes surinamensis 34 69 103 128 93 113 120 115 Escolar Lepidocybium flavobrunneum 34 43 39 56 45 60 34 43 Oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus 34 9 3 4 4 3 - - Snake mackerels, escolars nei Gempylidae 34 9 5 6 2 7 7 7 Largehead hairtail Trichiurus lepturus 34 9 135 5 215 6 022 6 672 6 917 4 104 4 319 Hairtails, scabbardfishes nei Trichiuridae 34 2 386 2 492 3 229 4 071 4 913 5 408 2 075 Black driftfish Hyperoglyphe bythites 34 2 2 4 2 1 1 2 Barrelfish Hyperoglyphe perciformis 34 - - 11 7 12 - - Scorpionfishes nei Scorpaenidae 34 - - 282 - - - - American angler Lophius americanus 34 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 Demersal percomorphs nei Perciformes 34 5 782 3 378 3 487 3 751 4 050 3 475 3 515 Round sardinella Sardinella aurita 35 109 026 64 447 55 621 37 140 48 910 42 827 43 108 Brazilian sardinella Sardinella brasiliensis 35 - - 0 - 0 - - Atlantic menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus 35 5 582 199 331 109 118 357 174 Gulf menhaden Brevoortia patronus 35 369 906 408 875 456 576 420 719 454 758 438 640 623 369 Scaled sardines Harengula spp 35 1 262 1 249 1 198 1 143 1 327 1 409 1 254 Atlantic thread herring Opisthonema oglinum 35 10 940 7 439 7 487 8 317 8 639 6 077 5 937 Atlantic anchoveta Cetengraulis edentulus 35 480 280 320 340 350 210 220 Broad-striped anchovy Anchoa hepsetus 35 - - - - 0 - 1 Anchovies, etc.
Recommended publications
  • Cytogenetic Analysis of Global Populations of Mugil Cephalus (Striped Mullet) by Different Staining Techniques and Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization

    Cytogenetic Analysis of Global Populations of Mugil Cephalus (Striped Mullet) by Different Staining Techniques and Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization

    Heredity 76 (1996) 77—82 Received 30 May 1995 Cytogenetic analysis of global populations of Mugil cephalus (striped mullet) by different staining techniques and fluorescent in situ hybridization ANNA RITA ROSSI, DONATELLA CROSETTIt, EKATERINA GORNUNG & LUCIANA SOLA* Department of Animal and Human Biology, University of Rome 7, Via A. Bore/li 50, 00161 Rome and tICRAM, Central Institute for Marine Research, Via L. Respighi 5, 00197 Rome, Italy Thepresent paper reports the results of cytogenetic analysis carried out on several scattered populations of the striped mullet, Mugil cephalus, the most widespead among mugilid species. The karyotype was investigated through Ag-staining, C-banding, fluorochrome-staining (chro- momycin A3/DAPI) and fluorescent in situ hybridization with rDNA genes. All populations showed the same chromosome number and morphology and no changes were detected in heterochromatin and NORs. Therefore, neither population- nor sex-specific marker chromo- somes were identified. In some of the specimens, NOR size heteromorphism was detected. Results are discussed with respect to karyotype and ribosomal cistrons organization and to cytotaxonomic implications. Keywords:cytotaxonomy,FISH, heterochromatin, karyotype, NOR. Although the karyotype of M cephalus is already Introduction known (Table 1), there are no data from differential Thestriped mullet, Mugil cephalus, is the most wide- staining techniques, except for observations on spread among mugilid species, and inhabits the trop- nucleolar organizer regions (NOR5) by Amemiya & ical and subtropical seas of the world. Both the Gold (1986). Moreover, previous studies cover only worldwide distribution, the range discontinuity few localities from the wide species range and speci- (Thomson, 1963) and the coastally-dependent life mens from more than one collecting site have never history have raised questions on the conspecificity of been observed in the same laboratory.
  • 229 Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names

    229 Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names

    previous page 229 INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES EXPLANATION OF THE SYSTEM Type faces used: Italics : Valid scientific names (genera and species) Italics : Synonyms * Italics : Misidentifications (preceded by an asterisk) ROMAN (saps) : Family names Roman : International (FAO) names of species 230 Page Page A African red snapper ................................................. 79 Abalistes stellatus ............................................... 42 African sawtail catshark ......................................... 144 Abámbolo ............................................................... 81 African sicklefìsh ...................................................... 62 Abámbolo de bajura ................................................ 81 African solenette .................................................... 111 Ablennes hians ..................................................... 44 African spadefish ..................................................... 63 Abuete cajeta ........................................................ 184 African spider shrimp ............................................. 175 Abuete de Angola ................................................. 184 African spoon-nose eel ............................................ 88 Abuete negro ........................................................ 184 African squid .......................................................... 199 Abuete real ........................................................... 183 African striped grunt ................................................
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf

    Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf

    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D

    Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D

    The Open Marine Biology Journal, 2008, 2, 29-37 29 Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D. Aurelle1, R.-M. Barthelemy*,2, J.-P. Quignard3, M. Trabelsi4 and E. Faure2 1UMR 6540 DIMAR, Station Marine d'Endoume, Rue de la Batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France 2LATP, UMR 6632, Evolution Biologique et Modélisation, case 18, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France 3Laboratoire d’Ichtyologie, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France 4Unité de Biologie marine, Faculté des Sciences, Campus Universitaire, 2092 Manar II, Tunis, Tunisie Abstract: Molecular phylogenetic relationships among five genera and twelve Mugilidae species were investigated us- ing published mitochondrial cytochrome b and 16S rDNA sequences. These analyses suggested the paraphyly of the genus Liza and also that the separation of Liza, Chelon and Oedalechilus might be unnatural. Moreover, all the species of the genus Mugil plus orthologs of Crenimugil crenilabis clustered together; however, molecular analyses suggested possible introgressions in Mugil cephalus and moreover, that fish identified as Mugil curema could correspond to two different species as already shown by karyotypic analyses. Keywords: Mugilidae, grey mullets, mitochondrial DNA, Mugil cephalus, introgression. INTRODUCTION We have focused this study on Mugilid species for which both cytochrome b (cytb) and 16S rDNA mtDNA sequences The family Mugilidae, commonly referred to as grey have been already published. Their geographic distributions mullets, includes several species which have a worldwide are briefly presented here. Oedalechilus labeo is limited to distribution; they inhabit marine, estuarine, and freshwater the Mediterranean Sea and the Moroccan Atlantic coast, environments at all latitudes except the Polar Regions [1]; a whereas, Liza and Chelon inhabit also the Eastern Atlantic few spend all their lives in freshwater [2].
  • I CHARACTERIZATION of the STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) in SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE of FISHERS and ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

    I CHARACTERIZATION of the STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) in SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE of FISHERS and ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

    i CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE OF FISHERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science ________________________________________________________________________ By Charlotte Marin 2018 ii APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science ________________________________________ Charlotte A. Marin Approved: 2018 ________________________________________ S. Gregory Tolley, Ph.D. Committee Chair ________________________________________ Richard Cody, Ph.D. ________________________________________ Edwin M. Everham III, Ph.D. The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to dedicate this project to Harvey and Kathryn Klinger, my loving grandparents, to whom I can attribute my love of fishing and passion for the environment. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my mom, Kathy, for providing a solid educational foundation that has prepared me to reach this milestone and inspired me to continuously learn. I would also like to thank my aunt, Deb, for always supporting my career aspirations and encouraging me to follow my dreams. I would like to thank my in-laws, Carlos and Dora, for their enthusiasm and generosity in babysitting hours and for always wishing the best for me. To my son, Leo, the light of my life, who inspires me every day to keep learning and growing, to set the best example for him.
  • Reproductive Development of Female Bonefish (Albula Spp.)

    Reproductive Development of Female Bonefish (Albula Spp.)

    REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF FEMALE BONEFISH (ALBULA SPP.) FROM THE BAHAMAS by Cameron Alexander Luck A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida December 2018 Copyright 2018 by Cameron Luck ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I sincerely appreciate the guidance of my advisor Dr. Matthew Ajemian for his continued support throughout this endeavor as well as the input from my committee members: Dr. Sahar Mejri, Dr. Aaron Adams, and Dr. Paul Wills. I am extremely grateful for the collaboration and support of Justin Lewis. Field collections would have been impossible without his local knowledge, willingness to be available, passion for bonefish, and incredible work ethic. I am also grateful for the words of wisdom and comedic relief often provided by fellow graduate students, lab members, and interns of the Fish Ecology and Conservation Lab: Grace Roskar, Breanna Degroot, Steve Lombardo, Rachel Shaw, Mike McCallister, Alex Allen, and many others. This project was financially supported by Bonefish & Tarpon Trust (BTT) and National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF). We are grateful for the lodging and water access provided by East End Lodge, Andros South, and Hank’s Place. The experimental protocol for this study received approval from Florida Atlantic University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Animal Use Protocol #A16-34). iv ABSTRACT Author: Cameron Luck Title: Reproductive Development of Female Bonefish (Albula spp.) from the Bahamas Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Matthew J. Ajemian Degree: Master of Science Year: 2018 Bonefish (Albula spp.) support an economically important sport fishery, yet little is known regarding the reproductive biology of this genus.
  • Uso De Polissacarídeos Não-Amiláceos Pela Tainha

    Uso De Polissacarídeos Não-Amiláceos Pela Tainha

    1 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE 2 INTITUTO DE OCEANOGRAFIA 3 PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM AQUICULTURA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 USO DE POLISSACARÍDEOS NÃO-AMILÁCEOS POR JUVENIS DE TAINHA 13 MUGIL LIZA (VALENCIENNES, 1836) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 LEONARDO ROCHA VIDAL RAMOS 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 RIO GRANDE 34 ABRIL 2015 1 1 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE 2 INTITUTO DE OCEANOGRAFIA 3 PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM AQUICULTURA 4 5 6 7 8 USO DE POLISSACARÍDEOS NÃO-AMILÁCEOS POR JUVENIS DE TAINHA 9 MUGIL LIZA (VALENCIENNES, 1836). 10 11 Leonardo Rocha Vidal Ramos 12 13 Tese apresentada como parte dos requisitos para 14 a obtenção do grau de doutor em Aquicultura no 15 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Aquicultura da 16 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande 17 Orientador: Dr. Marcelo Borges Tesser 18 Co-orientador: Dr. Paulo Cesar Abreu 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Rio Grande – RS – Brasil 27 Abril 2015 28 2 1 ÍNDICE 2 DEDICATÓRIA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 3 AGRADECIMENTOS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 4 RESUMO GERAL------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 5 GENERAL ABSTRACT ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 6 INTRODUÇÃO GERAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 7 REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS------------------------------------------------------ 22 8 OBJETIVOS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • CBD Strategy and Action Plan

    CBD Strategy and Action Plan

    http://www.wildlifetrust.org.uk/cumbria/importance%20of%20biodiversity.htm [Accessed 10th October, 2003]. Daiylpress (2002); Brown Tree frog; [on line]. Available on. www.vvdailypress.com/ living/biogeog [Accessed 13th December 2003]. FAO(2002); St. Kitts and Nevis Agricultural Diversification Project: Unpublished research presented to the Water Services Department. FloridaGardener (2002); Giant or marine Toad; [on line]. Available on. http://centralpets.com/pages/photopages/reptiles/frogs/ [Accessed 12th December 2003]. Friends of Guana River state park (2002); Racer snake; [on line] Available on. http://www.guanapark.org/ecology/fauna [Accessed 21st November, 2003]. GEF/UNDP(2000); Capacity Development Initiative; [online] Available on. http://www.gefweb.org/Documents/Enabling_Activity_Projects/CDI/LAC_Assessment.p df [Accessed 12th November, 2003]. Granger, M.A (1995) ; Agricultral Diversification Project : Land Use; Basseterre : Government of St.Kitts and Nevis. Guardianlife (2004);Leatherback turtle; [on line]. Available on. www.guardianlife.co.tt/glwildlife/ neckles.html [Accessed 15th May 2004] Harris, B(2001); Convention on Biological Diversity Country Study Report: Socio- economic issues; Basseterre, Government of St. Kitts and Nevis. Henry, C (2002); Civil Society & Citizenship; [on line]. Available on. http://www.la.utexas.edu/chenry/civil/archives95/csdiscuss/0006.html [Accessed 15th September 2003]. http://www.yale.edu/environment/publications/bulletin/101pdfs/101strong.pdf Heyliger, S (2001); Convention on Biological Diversity Country Study Report: Marine & Biodiversity; Government of St.Kitts and Nevis. Hilder, P (1989); The Birds of Nevis; Charlestown; Nevis Histroical and Conservation Society. Horwith, B & Lindsay, K(1999); A Biodiversity Profile of St. Kitts and Nevis; USVI; Island Resources Foundation. Imperial Valley College (2001); Spotted Sandpiper; [on line].
  • Bait Fisheries Serving the Marine Recreational Fisheries of Puerto Rico

    Bait Fisheries Serving the Marine Recreational Fisheries of Puerto Rico

    LEGORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. BAIT FISHERIES SERVING THE MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHERIES OF PUERTO RICO by Steve LeGore, Ph.D. Submitted to: Department of Natural and Environmental Resources Marine Resources Division San Juan, Puerto Rico Reference: DNER Contract Number 133-06000965 For Grant F-54 Contract Register Number 27-3-06 Submitted by: LeGore Environmental Associates, Inc. 2804 Gulf Drive Holmes Beach, FL 34217 Tel: (941) 778-4650 [email protected] Technical Report No. 06-113F May 11, 2007 PROLOGUE The author is grateful for the assistance and participation of several individuals, each making valuable contributions to the efforts described in this document. The program was initiated in coordination with Dr. Craig Lilyestrom of the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER), who has consistently supported the successful completion of this effort. He also reviewed a draft of this report prior to its finalization. Representatives of the commercial guided marine recreational fisher and bait fisher communities were very supportive, although some components of the non-commercial recreational community were more reticent. Mr. Jorge Casillas, a graduate student at the University of Puerto Rico, Mr. Eloy Martinez, an aspiring graduate student recently accepted at the University of South Florida, and Ms. Maria Camacho-Rodríguez of the DNER were of great help with certain logistic arrangements and in conducting certain interviews. Messrs. Mark Hardin and Frank Hearne provided helpful assistance and advice, and Christopher LeGore assisted with photographic production. Finally, Mr. Jose M. Berríos served as Contract Manager for DNER, as ably assisted by Ms. Aitza Pabón. All of these contributions were essential to the successful conduct of this effort, and all are appreciated.
  • Karyological Characterization of Mugil Trichodon Poey, 1876 (Pisces: Mugilidae)*

    Karyological Characterization of Mugil Trichodon Poey, 1876 (Pisces: Mugilidae)*

    sm69n4525-1949 21/11/05 16:06 Página 525 SCI. MAR., 69 (4): 525-530 SCIENTIA MARINA 2005 Karyological characterization of Mugil trichodon Poey, 1876 (Pisces: Mugilidae)* MAURO NIRCHIO 1, ERNESTO RON 1 and ANNA RITA ROSSI 2 1 Escuela de Ciencias Aplicadas del Mar, Universidad de Oriente, Apartado Postal 174-Porlamar, Isla de Margarita, Venezuela. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell'Uomo, Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Via A. Borelli 50, 00161 Roma, Italia. SUMMARY: Cytogenetic studies were conducted on Mugil trichodon from Margarita Island, Venezuela. The species showed a karyotype 2n=48 with entirely acrocentric chromosomes (Arm number, NF=48). Chromosomes gradually decreased in size and did not allow a clear distinction of homologues, except for one marker pair, which showed a conspic- uous secondary constriction. C-banding showed heterochromatic blocks restricted at the centromeric regions of all the chro- mosomes. Some were more obvious than others, with the exception of the chromosome pair that had a secondary constric- tion with entirely heterochromatic short arms. Sequential staining with Giemsa and AgNO3 demonstrated the conspicuous secondary constrictions corresponding to the NORs, and these had significant intraindividual size variations between both homologous chromosomes. The data obtained here support the contention that Mugilidae have a conservative chromosome macrostructure and reinforce the hypothesis that small structural chromosome rearrangements involving active NOR sites are the main cause of the karyotypic diversification seen in this group. Keywords: karyotype, NOR, C-banding, Mugil trichodon. RESUMEN: CARACTERIZACIÓN CARIOLÓGICA DE MUGIL TRICHODON POEY, 1876 (PISCES: MUGILIDAE). – Se presenta el estu- dio citogenético de Mugil trichodon de la Isla de Margarita, Venezuela.
  • Identification of Juveniles of Grey Mullet Species (Teleostei

    Identification of Juveniles of Grey Mullet Species (Teleostei

    Cah. Biol. Mar. (2008) 49 : 269-276 Identification of juveniles of grey mullet species (Teleostei: Perciformes) from Kuriat Islands (Tunisia) and evidence of gene flow between Atlantic and Mediterranean Liza aurata Monia TRABELSI1, Didier AURELLE2, Nawzet BOURIGA1,4, Jean-Pierre QUIGNARD3, Jean-Paul CASANOVA4 and Eric FAURE4* (1) Unité de Biologie marine, Faculté des Sciences, Campus Universitaire, 2092 Manar II, Tunis, Tunisie (2) UMR 6540 DIMAR, Station Marine d'Endoume, Rue de la batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France (3) Laboratoire d’Ichtyologie, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France (4) LATP, CNRS-UMR 6632, Evolution biologique et modélisation, case 5, Université de Provence, Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France *Corresponding author: Tel: 00 (33) 491 10 61 77, Fax: 00 (33) 491 10 62 25, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Unidentified juveniles of a grey mullet species from the Kuriat Islands (Tunisia) were compared with Mediterranean and Atlantic candidate species (Mugil spp. or Liza spp.) using a mitochondrial gene (cytochrome b). These analyses have shown that juveniles are L. aurata individuals; phylogenetic analyses supported this grouping with very high bootstrap values and also shown evidence of gene flow between Atlantic and Mediterranean populations. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses were congruent with the analyses of the number of pyloric caeca. As mugilid juveniles for aquaculture are still obtained from wild stocks, these data provided a valuable baseline for further investigations on identification of these fish. Moreover, using the polymerase chain reaction, sufficient DNA for phylogenetic analyses can be amplified from very small portions of caudal fins and these samples can be collected without sacrificing individuals, which is one important requirement for the study of species that young fry is used for stocking lagoons and lakes.
  • Growing MARINE BAITFISH a Guide to Florida’S Common Marine Baitfish and Their Potential for Aquaculture

    Growing MARINE BAITFISH a Guide to Florida’S Common Marine Baitfish and Their Potential for Aquaculture

    growing MARINE BAITFISH A guide to Florida’s common marine baitfish and their potential for aquaculture This publication was supported by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) under NOAA Grant No. NA10 OAR-4170079. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these organizations. Florida Sea Grant University of Florida || PO Box 110409 || Gainesville, FL, 32611-0409 (352)392-2801 || www. flseagrant.org Cover photo by Robert McCall, Ecodives, Key West, Fla. growing MARINE BAITFISH A guide to Florida’s common marine baitfish and their potential for aquaculture CORTNEY L. OHS R. LEROY CRESWEll MATTHEW A. DImaGGIO University of Florida/IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center 2199 South Rock Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34945 SGEB 69 February 2013 CONTENTS 2 Croaker Micropogonias undulatus 3 Pinfish Lagodon rhomboides 5 Killifish Fundulus grandis 7 Pigfish Orthopristis chrysoptera 9 Striped Mullet Mugil cephalus 10 Spot Leiostomus xanthurus 12 Ballyhoo Hemiramphus brasiliensis 13 Mojarra Eugerres plumieri 14 Blue Runner Caranx crysos 15 Round Scad Decapterus punctatus 16 Goggle-Eye Selar crumenophthalmus 18 Atlantic Menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus 19 Scaled Sardine Harengula jaguana 20 Atlantic Threadfin Opisthonema oglinum 21 Spanish Sardine Sardinella aurita 22 Tomtate Haemulon aurolineatum 23 Sand Perch Diplectrum formosum 24 Bay Anchovy Anchoa mitchilli 25 References 29 Example of Marine Baitfish Culture: Pinfish ABOUT Florida’s recreational fishery has a $7.5 billion annual economic impact—the highest in the United States. In 2006 Florida’s recreational saltwater fishery alone had an economic impact of $5.2 billion and was responsible for 51,500 jobs.