DOCSLIB.ORG

Contents Introduction Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contents Introduction Introduction ENERGY AGENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Contents Recent Energy Sector Development z Introduction and z Recent energy sector development AERS Responsibilities z Development and investment plan Ljiljana Hadžibabić z AERS* responsibilities Head of the Energy Department z Final remarks/ Conclusion NARUC’ Energy Regulatory Partnership Program AERS – PA PUC 3rd Partnership Activity 1 2 Belgrade, September 15 – 19, 2008 * - Energy Agency of the Republic of Serbia Introduction Introduction 7th century - first Serbian states Serbia 11th century - first kingdom z Serbia 1345 - Serbian empire 1389 - the first battle with Ottoman z Historical and geographical basic data empire, at Kosovo field 1540 -1867 – without independence 1918-1990 (’06) - Yugoslavia z Beginning of electrification and gasification since 2006 - Republic of Serbia z More than 100 years of electricity usage Land Area - 88,361 sq km (34,116 sq miles) z About 60 years of natural gas usage Population 7.5 Million (without K&M*) The main religion - Christian orthodox Estimated GDP 2008 – US$10, 985 pc (IMF) Capital – Belgrade, - Latitude 44° N 3 - Longitude 21° E 4 - population 1.6 Million * -K&M – Kosovo & Metohija First Power Plant based on AC Tesla’s principles – 1900 ! First gas well - 1949 z 1949 - the first gas well was activated z Source of domestic gas – northern Serbia HPP Vuce, 1903 (HPP Niagara 1895) 1893 - first public power station, Belgrade 1900 – first HPP based on AC Tesla’s principles, 1903 – first, 17km long-distance power line 1900-1911 –the oldest four HPPs, still in operation5 6 1 Recent Energy Sector Development Historical milestones z Recent trends z Electricity z Natural gas 10 000 z 1949 – 1979 development based on domestic z Production capacities and demands MW 8 000 sources z Problems in the period 1990-2000 z 1951 - construction of the gas transmission 6 000 system z Reconstruction and key achievement z 1979 - Gas demand based on domestic 4 000 sources reached 1 bcm z 1979 - conection with Hungarian net and the 2 000 HP network development started z Current situation 0 z 2005 - commencement of works on 1970 1980 1990 2004 2005 2006 the Underground Gas Storage Banatski Dvor z Primary energy demand TPP CHP HPP z Dependence on import z Balances z 1947 – commencement of HV networks, HHPs, open-pit mines and TPPs constructing z 1975 – 1985 intensive investment activities z 1990 – 25% surplus of electricity 7 8 z After 1990 – lack of investment, no new generation facilities Demand trends (1) Demand trends (2) Electricity Consumption Natural gas consumption 34 Milion Cu m TWh 3500 32 3000 30 2500 28 2000 26 1500 24 1000 22 500 20 0 9 10 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '90. '92. '94. '96. '98. '00 '02 '04 '06 2000 Demand trends (3) Problems in the period 1990-2000 Final energy consumption in industrial branches 4500 z International economic sanctions 4000 z Lack of liquid fuels and natural gas z Lack of money for sustainable development 3500 z Lack of financial means and spare parts for maintenance 3000 z Low electricity price 2500 z Deteriorated equipment 2000 1000 toe1000 z TPPs and open-pit mines 1500 z Electricity consumption for household heating 1000 z Damage from NATO AIR STRIKES in 1999 500 z Transmission network and TPPs; 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Iron and Steel Non-ferrous materials Construction materials Chemicals Non-metallic industry Textiles industry Wood industry Food industry Engineering 11 12 Paper industry Energy sector Other industries 2 Problems in the period 1990-2000 (2) Balance of electricity 1990 - 2007 45 mil.USD Annual Maintenance in Electric Power Industry TWh 350 40 35 300 30 250 25 200 20 150 15 10 100 5 50 0 0 '90. '92. '94. '96. '98. '00 '02 '04 '06 TPP TPP-HP HPP Gross Consumption '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '0713 14 International Community Assistance Reconstruction of capacities Since 2000 450 mil € donations - mostly from EU through EAR z Transmission network - after bombing Main areas of assistance: z Electricity imports z TPPs after period of lack of maintenances And bombing z Fuel for heating z Open-pit mines z Spare parts and equipment for PP’s and open-pit mines z Overhauls of TPP’s z District heating systems of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš z Reforms, capacity building and technical assistance 15 16 Results achieved 2000 2007/ ’08 Curent situation Insufficient production •Increased production of coal Low efficiency of PP’s and electricity z Primary energy demand Damaged transmission network •Repaired and renewed transmission network z Dependence on import During winter season 2000/01 z Electricity 55 days of power cuts Since winter season 2002/2003 z Structure of Power Generation despite International Community no power cuts Assistance z Transmission infrastructure z Balances New Tariff System & Average final all consumers From August 2008 z Natural gas 0.8 ¢$/KWh 5.5 ¢€ /KWh z Transmission infrastructure z Demand – gas and electricity TPP’s EFOR 34% TPP’s EFOR 12,6% 17 18 3 Primary energy demand – 2007 (1) Primary energy demand – 2007 (2) Total demand 14,824 M teo Mtoe 9,000 2007 6% 8,000 Imported: 41% Import 13% 7,000 z Oil: 87% dependence increases Coal 6,000 z Gas: 92% Oil Gas 5,000 Hydro z Coal: 11% 4,000 54% Domestic z Electricity: 1.9% of 4 months’ consumption in winter season; 3,000 27% Import exporter on yearly level 2,000 1,000 Import Domestic Domestic 0,000 Coal Oil Gas Hydro 19 20 Structure of Power Generation Transmission Infrastructure (without K&M) www.ems.rs 7155 MW (+ 1200 MW at K&M) MVA TRANSMISSION NETWORK, Dec 31, 2006 km 8 000 7 000 7 450 TPP 5 833 7 000 55,5% 6 000 Pumped- 6 000 5 882 storage PP 5 000 8,6% 5 000 4 000 4 050 4 000 3 000 3 000 2 170 1 650 2 000 2 000 HPPs vith 1 000 1 000 reservoir 5,2% 0 0 400 / x 220 / x 110 / x 400 kV 220 kV 110 kV Transformers Lines Lignite 2007: Input: 47,884 GWh Withdrawal from Run-of-river HPPs www.eps.rs Output : 46,597 GWh the neighboring systems: 8,905 GWh 25,8% TPP-HP 21 Injection into 22 4,9% Losses rate: 2,69% the neighboring systems: 8,658 GWh Electricity Balance 2007 (1) Electricity Balance 2007 (1) (without K&M) (without K&M) GWh 2007: 3 500 z Generation 34.4 TWh z Gross consumption 32.9 TWh 2 700 z Import 1.8 TWh 1 900 z Export 1.8 TWh 1 100 z Lignite production 36,5 mill t 300 z Number of consumers 3.3 mil Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -500 TPP TPP-HP HPP Import Consump. Cons. + Export Exp-Imp 23 24 4 Transit of electricity in 2007 Natural gas – basic infrastructure z One input point – from Hungary z Operating pressure in input point 43 bar z Natural gas storage - Installed capacity: z I phase 400 mcm z II phase 800 mcm z Transmission lines, total length 2200 km z Compressor station near Belgrade 4400 kW z Distribution pipeline - total lenght 10500km z Number of the main regulatory measurement stations - 152 25 26 Monthly Natural Gas Demand in 2007(1)7 Structure of Natural Gas Demand 2007 (2) mcm 350 4% 1% 7% 300 250 12% 39% 200 Industrial 150 District heating Raw material 100 Residential 17% 50 Commercial Power generation 0 Storage injection Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 27 28 20% Development and investment plan Development and investment plan - Legal framework - z Government - for Serbia z Legal framework z Energy Law, adopted 2004 z Regional approach and key studies z Energy Strategy until 2015, adopted 2005 z Program of Strategy implementation, adopted z Most important issues 2005 z Industry - for itself z 5 years Development plan - public utilities obligation z Yearly program of investments – obligation for all companies 29 30 5 Development and Investments Development and Investments - Key studies - - Resource (1) - z Regional and national approaches z Studies: z z REBIS:GIS – Regional Balkans Infrastructure Study and Domestic resources Generation Investment Study 2005 - 2020 z Lignite z List Cost Investment Plan for Serbia z South East Europe: Regional Gasification Study with z Hydro potential regard to analysis of storage facilities z South East Europe: Regional Gasification Study z Renewable sources z Recommendations for electricity sector: z SEE region will require z Imported resource z 12,700 MW of new capacity z 9,400 MW of rehabilitated capacity - to extend life time z Natural Gas z Serbia will require min z 640 MW of new capacities z 2,800 MW of rehabilitated capacities - to extend life time (mostly accomplished) 31 32 Development and Investments Development and Investments - Resource (2) - - Resource (3) - Lignite Hydro potential Serbia will have a supply of coal for the next Kovin 50 years (excluding K&M). basin Danube Kostolac basin Morava Kolubara Drina basin Lim Smal HPP, P < 10 MW Kosovo Reserve: 13.4 Bill.tons basin Total 17300 GWh/year Activated Drim Nonactivated 7100 GWh/year Metohija 7100 basin Development and Investments Development and Investments - Resource (4) - - Electricity until 2015 - (1) Renewable sources - Potential Assessment z Electricity demand forecast: 0.9% annually, by Electric Power Industry of Serbia, Development plan 2008 – 2015 z Small Hydro PP z Investment plan, rehabilitation and modernization of z 850 Sites, 450 MW, 1 500 GWh/year existing and construction of new capacities – 9.5 billions € z CADASTRE of Small PP’s (’87) z HPP – 1 056 millions € z Biomass z TPP and environmental protection – 3 840 millions € z Open-pit mines – 2 095 millions € z Wind power plants - farms z Transmission system – 400 millions € z Waste incineration… z Distribution system –
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • The PE EPS Environmental Report for 2015
    Environmental Protection Electric Power Industry of Serbia 2015 Environmental Report Belgrade, April 2016 PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia Environmental Protection INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................................6 1. COAL AND ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................7 1.1 PE EPS COAL PRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 PE EPS ELECTRICITY GENERATION ........................................................................................................................................7 1.3 FUEL CONSUMPTION AND HAZARDOUS AND HARMFUL SUBSTANCES AIR EMISSION FROM PE EPS TPPS ..................................8 1.4 PE EPS WORK INJURIES ......................................................................................................................................................10 1.5 PE EPS HEALTH ..................................................................................................................................................................10 2. KOLUBARA MINING BASIN BRANCH ......................................................................................................................................12 A KOLUBARA MB – OPEN CAST MINES
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxigenic Fungal and Mycotoxin Contamination of Maize Samples from Different Districts in Serbia
    Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 34 (2), p 239-249, 2018 ISSN 1450-9156 Publisher: Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun UDC 632.4:633.15 https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1802239K TOXIGENIC FUNGAL AND MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION OF MAIZE SAMPLES FROM DIFFERENT DISTRICTS IN SERBIA Vesna Krnjaja1, Slavica Stanković2, Miloš Lukić1, Nenad Mićić1, Tanja Petrović3, Zorica Bijelić1, Violeta Mandić1 1Institute for Animal Husbandry, Autoput 16, 11080, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia 2Maize Research Institute “Zemun Polje“, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia 3Institute of Food Technology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia Corresponding author: [email protected] Original scientific paper Abstract: This study was carried out in order to investigate the natural occurrence of toxigenic fungi and levels of zearalenone (ZEA), deoxynivalenol (DON) and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in the maize stored immediately after harvesting in 2016 and used for animal feed in Serbia. A total of 22 maize samples were collected from four different districts across the country: City of Belgrade (nine samples), Šumadija (eight samples), Podunavlje (four samples) and Kolubara (one sample). Toxigenic fungi were identified according to the morphological characteristics whereas the mycotoxins contamination were detected using biochemistry enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent (ELISA) assay. The tested samples were mostly infected with Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium spp., except that one sample originated from Kolubara was not contaminated with Aspergillus species. Fusarium graminearum was the most common species in the maize sample from Kolubara district (60%), F. verticillioides in the maize samples from Podunavlje (43.75%) and City of Belgrade (22.4%) districts, and Penicillium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Serbia: Floods
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRRS014 Glide n°: FF2020-00158-SRB Expected timeframe: 4 months Date of issue: 10 July 2020 Expected end date: 30 November 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 313,953 Total number of people affected: 52,745 Number of people to be 20,256 assisted: Provinces affected: 24 Provinces targeted: 20 Host National Societypresence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Red Cross of Serbia (RCS) with 222 volunteers and 83 staff in the branches of Arilje, Blace, Cacak, Despotovac, Doljevac, Gornji Milanovac, Ivanjica, Koceljeva, Kosjeric, Krusevac, Kursumlija, Lucani, Majdanpek, Osecina, Pozega, Prokuplje, Zitoradja, Kraljevo, Ljubovija, Trstenik, Krupanj, Obrenovac, Bajina Basta, Vladimirci. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Sector for emergency of the Ministry of Interior, members of the Municipal Emergency Response headquarters (municipal emergency services), Serbian Armed Forces, local public companies. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster For two weeks before the date of the disaster, which occurred on 22-24 June, the Republic of Serbia was affected by heavy rainfalls. The most affected areas are Kolubarski, Moravicki, Raski, Zlatiborski, Rasinski, Toplicki, Jablanicki, and Pomoravski districts. 8 municipalities and cities reported on 22 June that were affected by heavy rain that caused flash floods and floods. It was reported that the municipalities of Osecina, Ljubovija, and Lucani are the most affected by heavy rain (more than 40 litres per square meter in 24 hours) leading to floods in the whole region.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • Prostorni Plan Podru^Ja Reis-A Kosova I Metohije
    WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT Slavka Zeković and Tamara Maričić DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ECONOMIC DISTRICTS IN BELGRADE METROPOLITAN AREA Slavka Zeković, PhD, Tamara Maričić, MSc Institute of Architecture and Town & Regional Planning of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 73/II SERBIA e-mail:[email protected]; www.iaus.org.yu Abstract: Paper discusses new economic districts and spatial structures of the economic activities in metropolitan areas influenced by transitional processes and globalisation. It indicates the impacts of new economic trends and economic districts on creation of metropolitan areas’ spatial organisation. Paper shows mechanisms of the agglomeration of new economic poles and spatial-economic clusters in metropolitan areas. These mechanisms have consequences on economic and spatial changes, on changes of urban, regional and social structures, on environmental degradation, etc. New economic zones in metropolitan areas are result of market pressures, the increase of economic competitiveness and influences of foreign and domestic companies on the territorial capital of those areas and their urban/ spatial structures. There are indications of possible development impacts on creation of new economic districts with the preliminary analyses of Belgrade metropolitan area. Paper concludes that new economic districts – new industrial, commercial, entrepreneurial zones that developed systematically or spontaneously in the suburban areas (along highways) of Belgrade metropolitan area, have a major role in spatial development of economic activities and in the planning of territorial organization of this area. Key words: new economic districts, spatial clusters, business activities, sustainable development, urban policy, urban development 1 Introduction necessary to incorporate European strategic The new economic and social development frameworks, approaches and planning practises policy (based on the Lisbon agenda) founded on [1,2,3,4].
    [Show full text]
  • The Availability of Data Had to Fields Might Have Been Included, As They Are Part and Parcel of the Sidered, As They Frequently
    A SURVE OF BALKAN HOUSES AND FARM BUILDINGS Majda Tharnher INTRODUCTION This study is an analysis of settlement patterns, the construc- tion and form of houses, yards and farm buildings in peasant communities in Yugoslavia, Albania, Bulgaria and Rumania. It might appear more logical to cover the whole of the Balkan Peninsula in which case Greece should have been added and Rumania excluded. How- ever, my main interest is in the Southern Slays of which Greek culture is not a part. Albania, on the other hand, has certain affinities to the culture of Slavic Montenegro., such as in social organization, and the large Albanian element in the population of southwestern Serbia has probably influenced the material culture of that region. In any case the political boundary between Yugoslavia and Albania scarcely reflects the cultural affiliation. The deci- sion to- include Ruania, which cannot be considered a purely Slavic country, rests on historical factors, for Rumania also came under the influence of Turkish rule, sharing the fate of other Balkan countries. The inclusion of Rumania should therefore throw light on the effect of Turkish culture on rural settlements in this region. It was deemed desirable to keep the time factor constant and to choose a period after liberation from Turkish rule and before urban influence had affected rural areas. The availability of data had to be taken into consideration, and, since material on the first half of the 19th century is scarce, most of the research being done with the beginning of the 20th century, the period between 1875 and 1900 was selected.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Description of the Ongoing Supply-Demand Situation with the Following Indicators Included, Reference Should Be Made
    SECURITY OF SUPPLY - SERBIA - 1. Electricity Production vs. demand Tables and diagram below show operational data of Serbian electricity production and demand for period of 2001-2006, subdivided into generation sources, as well as the available production capacity in Serbia. SERBIA 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 (OPERATIONAL DATA) Thermal conventional net production GWh 22042,9 22223,2 24318,2 24081,0 26565,0 27602,0 Hydraulic net production GWh 10693,2 10528,5 9213,9 11135,0 11924,0 10850,0 Total production GWh 32736,1 32751,7 33532,1 35216,0 38489,0 38452,0 National electrical consumption GWh 33805,2 33377,8 34378,0 35114,0 36573,0 37126,0 Consumption of pumps GWh 1047,1 1027,9 531,2 792,0 962,0 851,0 Demand (consumption+pumps) GWh 34852,3 34405,7 34909,2 35906,0 37535,0 37977,0 Exchange in parallel operation1 GWh -824,9 347,9 -1023,4 -948,9 Exchange in island operation GWh -1291,4 -2001,8 -354,0 258,0 Total exchange GWh -2116,2 -1653,9 -1377,4 -690,9 954,0 4,0 Main fuel(s) Capacity (MW) in 2006 Lignite 3936 Hydroelectricity 2831 -run-of river HPP 1797 -storage HPP 420 -reversible HPP 614 Liquid fuel-fired combined heat and power plants 353 Total 7120 Total (including lignite TPPs on the territory of Kosovo) 2 8335 including Kosovo and Metohija excluding Kosovo and Metohija Lignite-fired PP 71.3% 68% Liquid fuel –fired 0.5% 0.55% Hydro power plants 28.2% (run-of-river: 23.5% and storage: 31.55% 4.8%) 1 Reconnection to UCTE happened in October 2004 2 Since June 1999, Serbia does not operate its facilities on the territory under UNMIK according to 1244 SC Resolution 1 45000,0 40000,0 35000,0 30000,0 25000,0 HPP TPP 20000,0 Exchange Demand 15000,0 10000,0 5000,0 0,0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 -5000,0 The Serbian Energy Strategy 2005-2015 envisages the growth rate of electricity consumption from 2.2 % to 1.7 % annually, depending on the economy development scenario, for mentioned period.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia Exclusive: Bidders for New TPP Kolubara 2 and TENT B3, China Vs Others, Report
    Serbia exclusive: Bidders for new TPP Kolubara 2 and TENT B3, China vs others, report The development of electric power system is a key link in the development of the entire electric power system of Serbia and about nine billion EUR should be invested in this area by 2030th, according to the new Energy Development Strategy Draft. It was estimated that the demands for electricity until 2025 would increase by 10.5 percent, and 16.6 percent by 2030th. No power plant was built in Serbia more than twenty years. Electricity production in Serbia meets the domestic market needs, but generally is not sufficient for consumption during average winter, so the electricity must be imported. The potential for the new thermal power plants construction exists, but it is certain that there is not enough money. Investment in the construction of new thermal capacities would be of great importance, as it would solve the problem of kilowatts shortage produced in the country, and at the same time the electricity export would be possible in the Balkan region. To note, coal in Serbia contributes in electricity production even with 64.1 %, hydro energy with 34.5 %, and natural gas with 1.4 %. The situation is such that the country energy stability depends on coal. Coal has a certain future. Provided that it meets all strict measures for the environment protection, the new technologies modernization and introduction, coal will remain the leading energy source, regardless of all “European histories” on renewable energy. Decisions adopted at the recently held Ministerial Council of the Energy Community of Southeast Europe provide an opportunity for the realization of the long-announced investments in the energy sector, such as thermal power plant “Kolubara B” and”Nikola Tesla B3″.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Water Used for Irrigation of Agricultural Soil in the Basin of Kolubara River
    Soil -Water Jour nal Soil-Water Journal, 2015, Special Issue, 36-42 The quality of water used for irrigation of agricultural soil in the basin of Kolubara river Radmila Pivic *, Zoran Dinic, Dragana Josic, Aleksandra Stanojkovic Sebic Institute of Soil Science, Belgrade, Serbia *Corresponding author e-mail : [email protected] Received : 15.12.2013 Accepted: 14.04.1014 Abstract This paper presents the results of testing the quality of water for irrigation during the growing seasons 2012/2013, in the basin of the Kolubara River, from Belo ševac to Obrenovac, in three monitoring cycles on 16 selected sites belonging to agricultural area under irrigation. The determination of quantity of trace elements and heavy metals Cr, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd, B, As, Fe, Hg was performed during mentioned period. The content of trace elements and heavy metals in the samples of water is generally below the maximum allowable concentration (MAC). In the samples No. 2, 3, 4, in the second series of sampling was recorded higher content of As above the MAC, which can be explained by drought, low water levels and potential anthropogenic pollution. In the other two cycles of monitoring are not registered concentrations of tested elements above MAC. Based on the presented and analyzed results of testing of hazardous and harmful substances in the water for irrigation of the Kolubara River, it can be concluded that it can be used for irrigation of crops and soil with restrictions and frequent quality checks during the summer months and control potential sources of pollution from industry. Keywords: Harmful substances, irrigation water, soil INTRODUCTION The scope of the research conducted in this The major proportion of all water quality paper is the study of quality of irrigation water from degradation worldwide is due to anthropogenic the Kolubara River, complies with the requirements causes (Faniran et al., 2001; Simeonov et al., of FAO, 1954 and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. BIODIVERSITY IN SERBIA – STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS; SIGNIFICANCE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR HUMAN WELL-BEING 14 1.1. Abiotic and biotic factors of biodiversity in Serbia 14 1.2. Diversity of ecosystems in Serbia 15 1.3. Threats and pressures exerted on biodiversity in sensitive ecosystems 18 1.3.1. Pressures on biodiversity - examples 22 1.4. Protected areas 28 1.4.1. National protected areas 29 1.4.2. Areas of international importance for the conservation of biodiversity 34 1.5. Protected species 36 1.5.1. Diversity of macromycetes in Serbia 41 1.6. Overview of studies and data on ecosystem services in Serbia 43 1.7. Natural resource systems and well-being of people in Serbia 48 1.7.1. Agricultural land in Serbia 49 1.7.2. Allocation of agricultural land 50 1.7.3. National agroecological program 53 1.7.5. Fish resources in Serbia 55 1.7.6. Forest ecosystems 57 1.7.7. Ecosystem services – forest ecosystems 60 1.7.8. Collection of wild species from nature 63 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR BIODIVERSITY WITH AN ACTION PLAN AND THE INCLUSION OF BIODIVERSITY INTO OTHER SECTORS 70 2.1. The Strategy for biodiversity of the Republic of Serbia with the Action plan for the period from 2011 to 2018 70 2.2. Strategic goals of biodiversity 71 2.3. Review of the Strategy of biodiversity in Serbia 74 2.4. Activities taken at the national level regarding implementation of the Convention on Biodiversity, after submission of the Fourth national report (2011-2014) 75 2.4.1.
    [Show full text]