Contents Introduction Introduction

Contents Introduction Introduction

ENERGY AGENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Contents Recent Energy Sector Development z Introduction and z Recent energy sector development AERS Responsibilities z Development and investment plan Ljiljana Hadžibabić z AERS* responsibilities Head of the Energy Department z Final remarks/ Conclusion NARUC’ Energy Regulatory Partnership Program AERS – PA PUC 3rd Partnership Activity 1 2 Belgrade, September 15 – 19, 2008 * - Energy Agency of the Republic of Serbia Introduction Introduction 7th century - first Serbian states Serbia 11th century - first kingdom z Serbia 1345 - Serbian empire 1389 - the first battle with Ottoman z Historical and geographical basic data empire, at Kosovo field 1540 -1867 – without independence 1918-1990 (’06) - Yugoslavia z Beginning of electrification and gasification since 2006 - Republic of Serbia z More than 100 years of electricity usage Land Area - 88,361 sq km (34,116 sq miles) z About 60 years of natural gas usage Population 7.5 Million (without K&M*) The main religion - Christian orthodox Estimated GDP 2008 – US$10, 985 pc (IMF) Capital – Belgrade, - Latitude 44° N 3 - Longitude 21° E 4 - population 1.6 Million * -K&M – Kosovo & Metohija First Power Plant based on AC Tesla’s principles – 1900 ! First gas well - 1949 z 1949 - the first gas well was activated z Source of domestic gas – northern Serbia HPP Vuce, 1903 (HPP Niagara 1895) 1893 - first public power station, Belgrade 1900 – first HPP based on AC Tesla’s principles, 1903 – first, 17km long-distance power line 1900-1911 –the oldest four HPPs, still in operation5 6 1 Recent Energy Sector Development Historical milestones z Recent trends z Electricity z Natural gas 10 000 z 1949 – 1979 development based on domestic z Production capacities and demands MW 8 000 sources z Problems in the period 1990-2000 z 1951 - construction of the gas transmission 6 000 system z Reconstruction and key achievement z 1979 - Gas demand based on domestic 4 000 sources reached 1 bcm z 1979 - conection with Hungarian net and the 2 000 HP network development started z Current situation 0 z 2005 - commencement of works on 1970 1980 1990 2004 2005 2006 the Underground Gas Storage Banatski Dvor z Primary energy demand TPP CHP HPP z Dependence on import z Balances z 1947 – commencement of HV networks, HHPs, open-pit mines and TPPs constructing z 1975 – 1985 intensive investment activities z 1990 – 25% surplus of electricity 7 8 z After 1990 – lack of investment, no new generation facilities Demand trends (1) Demand trends (2) Electricity Consumption Natural gas consumption 34 Milion Cu m TWh 3500 32 3000 30 2500 28 2000 26 1500 24 1000 22 500 20 0 9 10 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '90. '92. '94. '96. '98. '00 '02 '04 '06 2000 Demand trends (3) Problems in the period 1990-2000 Final energy consumption in industrial branches 4500 z International economic sanctions 4000 z Lack of liquid fuels and natural gas z Lack of money for sustainable development 3500 z Lack of financial means and spare parts for maintenance 3000 z Low electricity price 2500 z Deteriorated equipment 2000 1000 toe1000 z TPPs and open-pit mines 1500 z Electricity consumption for household heating 1000 z Damage from NATO AIR STRIKES in 1999 500 z Transmission network and TPPs; 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Iron and Steel Non-ferrous materials Construction materials Chemicals Non-metallic industry Textiles industry Wood industry Food industry Engineering 11 12 Paper industry Energy sector Other industries 2 Problems in the period 1990-2000 (2) Balance of electricity 1990 - 2007 45 mil.USD Annual Maintenance in Electric Power Industry TWh 350 40 35 300 30 250 25 200 20 150 15 10 100 5 50 0 0 '90. '92. '94. '96. '98. '00 '02 '04 '06 TPP TPP-HP HPP Gross Consumption '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '0713 14 International Community Assistance Reconstruction of capacities Since 2000 450 mil € donations - mostly from EU through EAR z Transmission network - after bombing Main areas of assistance: z Electricity imports z TPPs after period of lack of maintenances And bombing z Fuel for heating z Open-pit mines z Spare parts and equipment for PP’s and open-pit mines z Overhauls of TPP’s z District heating systems of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš z Reforms, capacity building and technical assistance 15 16 Results achieved 2000 2007/ ’08 Curent situation Insufficient production •Increased production of coal Low efficiency of PP’s and electricity z Primary energy demand Damaged transmission network •Repaired and renewed transmission network z Dependence on import During winter season 2000/01 z Electricity 55 days of power cuts Since winter season 2002/2003 z Structure of Power Generation despite International Community no power cuts Assistance z Transmission infrastructure z Balances New Tariff System & Average final all consumers From August 2008 z Natural gas 0.8 ¢$/KWh 5.5 ¢€ /KWh z Transmission infrastructure z Demand – gas and electricity TPP’s EFOR 34% TPP’s EFOR 12,6% 17 18 3 Primary energy demand – 2007 (1) Primary energy demand – 2007 (2) Total demand 14,824 M teo Mtoe 9,000 2007 6% 8,000 Imported: 41% Import 13% 7,000 z Oil: 87% dependence increases Coal 6,000 z Gas: 92% Oil Gas 5,000 Hydro z Coal: 11% 4,000 54% Domestic z Electricity: 1.9% of 4 months’ consumption in winter season; 3,000 27% Import exporter on yearly level 2,000 1,000 Import Domestic Domestic 0,000 Coal Oil Gas Hydro 19 20 Structure of Power Generation Transmission Infrastructure (without K&M) www.ems.rs 7155 MW (+ 1200 MW at K&M) MVA TRANSMISSION NETWORK, Dec 31, 2006 km 8 000 7 000 7 450 TPP 5 833 7 000 55,5% 6 000 Pumped- 6 000 5 882 storage PP 5 000 8,6% 5 000 4 000 4 050 4 000 3 000 3 000 2 170 1 650 2 000 2 000 HPPs vith 1 000 1 000 reservoir 5,2% 0 0 400 / x 220 / x 110 / x 400 kV 220 kV 110 kV Transformers Lines Lignite 2007: Input: 47,884 GWh Withdrawal from Run-of-river HPPs www.eps.rs Output : 46,597 GWh the neighboring systems: 8,905 GWh 25,8% TPP-HP 21 Injection into 22 4,9% Losses rate: 2,69% the neighboring systems: 8,658 GWh Electricity Balance 2007 (1) Electricity Balance 2007 (1) (without K&M) (without K&M) GWh 2007: 3 500 z Generation 34.4 TWh z Gross consumption 32.9 TWh 2 700 z Import 1.8 TWh 1 900 z Export 1.8 TWh 1 100 z Lignite production 36,5 mill t 300 z Number of consumers 3.3 mil Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -500 TPP TPP-HP HPP Import Consump. Cons. + Export Exp-Imp 23 24 4 Transit of electricity in 2007 Natural gas – basic infrastructure z One input point – from Hungary z Operating pressure in input point 43 bar z Natural gas storage - Installed capacity: z I phase 400 mcm z II phase 800 mcm z Transmission lines, total length 2200 km z Compressor station near Belgrade 4400 kW z Distribution pipeline - total lenght 10500km z Number of the main regulatory measurement stations - 152 25 26 Monthly Natural Gas Demand in 2007(1)7 Structure of Natural Gas Demand 2007 (2) mcm 350 4% 1% 7% 300 250 12% 39% 200 Industrial 150 District heating Raw material 100 Residential 17% 50 Commercial Power generation 0 Storage injection Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 27 28 20% Development and investment plan Development and investment plan - Legal framework - z Government - for Serbia z Legal framework z Energy Law, adopted 2004 z Regional approach and key studies z Energy Strategy until 2015, adopted 2005 z Program of Strategy implementation, adopted z Most important issues 2005 z Industry - for itself z 5 years Development plan - public utilities obligation z Yearly program of investments – obligation for all companies 29 30 5 Development and Investments Development and Investments - Key studies - - Resource (1) - z Regional and national approaches z Studies: z z REBIS:GIS – Regional Balkans Infrastructure Study and Domestic resources Generation Investment Study 2005 - 2020 z Lignite z List Cost Investment Plan for Serbia z South East Europe: Regional Gasification Study with z Hydro potential regard to analysis of storage facilities z South East Europe: Regional Gasification Study z Renewable sources z Recommendations for electricity sector: z SEE region will require z Imported resource z 12,700 MW of new capacity z 9,400 MW of rehabilitated capacity - to extend life time z Natural Gas z Serbia will require min z 640 MW of new capacities z 2,800 MW of rehabilitated capacities - to extend life time (mostly accomplished) 31 32 Development and Investments Development and Investments - Resource (2) - - Resource (3) - Lignite Hydro potential Serbia will have a supply of coal for the next Kovin 50 years (excluding K&M). basin Danube Kostolac basin Morava Kolubara Drina basin Lim Smal HPP, P < 10 MW Kosovo Reserve: 13.4 Bill.tons basin Total 17300 GWh/year Activated Drim Nonactivated 7100 GWh/year Metohija 7100 basin Development and Investments Development and Investments - Resource (4) - - Electricity until 2015 - (1) Renewable sources - Potential Assessment z Electricity demand forecast: 0.9% annually, by Electric Power Industry of Serbia, Development plan 2008 – 2015 z Small Hydro PP z Investment plan, rehabilitation and modernization of z 850 Sites, 450 MW, 1 500 GWh/year existing and construction of new capacities – 9.5 billions € z CADASTRE of Small PP’s (’87) z HPP – 1 056 millions € z Biomass z TPP and environmental protection – 3 840 millions € z Open-pit mines – 2 095 millions € z Wind power plants - farms z Transmission system – 400 millions € z Waste incineration… z Distribution system –

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us