DOCSLIB.ORG

The Royal Australian Engineer (RAE) Corp World War 1 to Present Hosted by Gold Coast Regional Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Royal Australian Engineer (RAE) Corp World War 1 to Present Hosted by Gold Coast Regional Group The Royal Australian Engineer (RAE) Corp World War 1 to present Hosted by Gold Coast Regional Group VENUE WW1 and Gallipoli – The role of engineers and Nerang RSL achievements 69 Nerang Street, Presented by Mark Swain Nerang QLD 4211 The presentation will give a brief overview of the role DATE & TIME engineers took through World War 1, with a focus on Wednesday 5 August 2015 Gallipoli. This historical overview will show through a series 6:00pm for 6:30pm start of pictures the hardships and achievements made by the Royal Australian Engineers. The provision of basic TICKETS (incl. GST) necessities such as power and communications in the harsh environment generated significant challenges. The need to Non-members $85.00 overcome significant obstacles, such as rivers and poor EA Members $55.00 ground conditions, with limited resources and technology RSL Members $55.00 tested the skills of those involved – the outcomes by Students: $45.00 necessity were practical. (dinner & beverages incl.) About the Speaker: REGISTRATIONS CLOSE Mark Swain is a committee member for Nerang RSL and is 12pm - Friday 31 July 2015 the manager for the World War 1 Display Centre at Nerang. Mark had over 20 years experience in the Australian Army. He was a technician who worked in many roles with the army, with periods in the Royal Australian Engineers 21 Construction Regiment 103 Construction Squadron through to Royal Australian Artillery 41 Field Battery. He had active For further information contact service in East Timor from 1999 to 2000. In recent years he CPD Events & Group has put time into researching the historical records of World Engagement Team War 1 and Gallipoli for the development of the Nerang RSL Phone: 1300 653 113 Display Centre. This role is expected to continue over the Email: next 4 years for the 100 year commemoration of World [email protected] War1. The Royal Australian Engineer (RAE) Corp World War 1 to present Hosted by Gold Coast Regional Group RAEs role in various theatres since the end of World War 1 Presented day By Patrick Kidd, CPEng, RAE Corp The presentation will give a brief overview of the RAEs role in various theatres since the end of World War 1 to the present day. The RAE has had substantial involvement in virtually all theatres of conflict, peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, development work and infrastructure works undertaken within Australia that have involved the Australian Army, since the end of World War 1. Through a series of pictures and some background briefing a synopsis of these operations and works will be provided to assist the audience in understanding the types of tasks the RAE corp has undertaken over the last 100 years. About the Speaker Patrick Kidd is currently working as the Geotechnics Manager SMEC Gold Coast office. He has over 20 years' experience in geotechnical engineering and engineering geology. Patrick is also a long term serving member of the Royal Australian Engineers. He has served in the Army Reserve for over 20 years and performed virtually every job at soldier and non- commissioned officer level, within a combat engineer squadron up to and including the Squadron Sergeant Major. Over his army career Patrick has been deployed to East Timor and locally on Operation Flood Assist. He has also deployed as a post disaster recovery specialist for Aus Aid/Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade four times, generally working closely on these operations with Australian Defence Force and other Australian Government personnel. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3: Australian Force Structure, Interoperability and Intelligence
    3 Australian force structure, interoperability and intelligence Introduction 3.1 The Australian Defence Force (ADF) remains primarily structured for operations in defence of Australia1, yet it is increasingly involved in coalition operations with US forces, supporting Australia’s wider interests and objectives beyond our immediate neighbourhood. An ongoing challenge for the ADF is to determine the most effective way it can contribute both to potential operations in Defence of Australia, and the increasingly more demanding operations beyond our immediate neighbourhood. 3.2 The moderate levels of conventional threat in Australia’s immediate region, linked with the low likelihood of a conventional attack on Australia, compared to the high threats faced by the ADF when deployed to locations like Iraq and Afghanistan raises questions about the suitability of Australia’s force structure. Evidence to the inquiry is divided over whether adjustments to force structure, as a result of coalition operations a long way from Australia, are justified. 3.3 A number of force structure determinants are emerging from Australia’s recent involvement in coalition operations. The key determinant for conducting coalition operations remains, however, the ability to be interoperable with our allies in a range of key areas. The importance of interoperability to ADF operations will be examined and the key issues raised in evidence will be discussed. 1 Australian Government, Defence 2000 – Our Future Defence Force, p. XI. 24 AUSTRALIA’S DEFENCE RELATIONS WITH THE US 3.4 The final section of the chapter examines the significance of intelligence sharing between Australia and the US. The discussion will explore the key benefits and disadvantages of our intelligence sharing arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brisbane Line
    1 The Brisbane Line A publication of the Royal United Service Institute Queensland Inc. Promoting Australia’s National Security & Defence A Constituent Body of the Royal United Services Institute of Australia ABN: 91 025 331 202 Tel: (07) 3233 4420 Victoria Barracks, Brisbane QLD 4000 (07) 3233 4616 Correspondence to: Email: [email protected] Victoria Barracks Brisbane Web: www.rusi.org.au ENOGGERA QLD 4051 Patron: Her Excellency, the Governor of Qld, Ms Penelope Wensley, AC Vice Patrons: VOL: 1 ISSUE: 4 MAJGEN S.Smith, DSC , AM AIRCDRE T. Innes CMDR P.Tedman, DSM, ADC, RAN November 2013 Commissioner I. Stewart, APM Management Committee: PRESIDENT’S REPORT President: AIRCDRE Andrew Kilgour, AM Vice Pres (Ops) SQNLDR John Forrest, RFD (Ret’d) Vice Pres (Admin) Mr Peter Mapp Welcome to the November issue of the RUSI Hon. Secretary LTCOL Ian Willoughby, (Ret’d) Hon. Treasurer Mr Barry Dinneen, FCA, FTIA, JP(Qual) Qld newsletter ‘The Brisbane Line’. This will be Hon. Librarian LTCOL Dal Anderson, RFD, ED (Ret’d) the last one for 2013 and a fitting close to a good Asst Sec (Publicity) Mr Duncan McConnell Committee : LTCOL Russell Linwood, ASM year for RUSIQ. Our lectures from August CAPT Neville Jolly (Ret’d) onwards will be reproduced in this issue and the Mr Sean Kenny, ASM Editor Brisbane Line: Mrs Mary Ross February 2014 issue. Inaugural President 1892-94: Our Annual General meeting was held on MAJGEN J F Owen, Commander Qld Defence Force Wednesday, 18 September 2013 following the Past Presidents: monthly lecture. I am pleased to announce that 2009-11 AIRCDRE P W Growder the Committee was elected again for the next 12 2006-09 BRIG W J A Mellor DSC, AM 2003-06 GPCAPT R C Clelland AM months – I look forward to working with the 2001-03 MAJGEN J C Hartley AO team again.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicals and Recurring Documents
    PERIODICALS AND RECURRING DOCUMENTS May 2012 Legend A ANNUAL S-M SEMI-MONTHLY D DAILY BI-M BI-MONTHLY W WEEKLY Q QUARTERLY BI-W BI-WEEKLY TRI-A TRI-ANNUAL M MONTHLY IRR IRREGULAR S-A SEMI-ANNUAL A ACADEME. (BI-M) 1985-1989 ACADEMY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. PROCEEDINGS. (IRR) 1960-1991 (MFILM 1975-1980) (MFICHE 1981-1982) ACQUISITION REVIEW QUARTERLY. (Q) 1994-2003 CONTINUED BY DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL. AD ASTRA-TO THE STARS. (M) 1989-1992 ADA. (Q) 1991-1997 FORMERLY AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY. ADF: AFRICA DEFENSE FORUM. (Q) 2008- ADVANCE. (A) 1986-1994 ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. SEE S.A.M. ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. ADVISOR. (Q) 1974-1978 FORMERLY JOURNAL OF NAVY CIVILIAN MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. ADVOCATE. (BI-M) 1982-1984 - 1 - AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1977-1978 CONTINUED BY AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1979-1986 FORMERLY AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. AEROSPACE. (Q) 1963-1987 AEROSPACE AMERICA. (M) 1984-1998 FORMERLY ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE SCIENCE. (Q) 1990-1991 FORMERLY DEFENSE SCIENCE. AEROSPACE HISTORIAN. (Q) 1965-1988 FORMERLY AIRPOWER HISTORIAN. CONTINUED BY AIR POWER HISTORY. AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL. (BI-M) 1967-1981 FORMERLY AIR FORCE SPACE DIGEST INTERNATIONAL. AEROSPACE MEDICINE. (M) 1973-1974 CONTINUED BY AVIATION SPACE AND EVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE. AEROSPACE POWER JOURNAL. (Q) 1999-2002 FORMERLY AIRPOWER JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL. AEROSPACE SAFETY. (M) 1976-1980 AFRICA REPORT. (BI-M) 1967-1995 (MFICHE 1979-1994) AFRICA TODAY. (Q) 1963-1990; (MFICHE 1979-1990) 1999-2007 AFRICAN SECURITY. (Q) 2010- AGENDA. (M) 1978-1982 AGORA.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Operations at Pine Gap
    The Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability Management of Operations at Pine Gap Desmond Ball, Bill Robinson and Richard Tanter Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability Special Report 24 November 2015 Summary The management of operations at the Pine Gap facility has become increasingly complex as the functions of the station have expanded, the number of agencies involved has grown, and the demands of a wider range of ‘users’ or ‘customers’ for the provision of ‘actionable intelligence’ in near real-time have increased markedly. Operations at Pine Gap are now completely integrated, in terms of American and Australian, civilian and military, and contractor personnel working together in the Operations Room; the organisational structure for managing operations, which embodies concerted collaboration of multiple US agencies, including the National Reconnaissance Office, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Service Cryptologic Agencies and the National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency (NGA); and functionally with respect to signals intelligence (SIGINT) collected by the geosynchronous SIGINT satellites controlled by Pine Gap, communications intelligence collected by foreign satellite/communications satellite (FORNSAT/COMSAT) interception systems at Pine Gap, and imagery and geospatial intelligence produced by the NGA, as well as missile launch detection and tracking data. Conceptualising the extraordinary growth and expansion of operations at Pine Gap is not easy – by the nature of the facility. Externally, it is evident in the increase in size of the two main operations buildings within the high security compound – areas quite distinct from the separate part of the facility that deals with administration matters. The total area of floor space in the Operations Buildings has increased five-fold since 1970 to more than 20,000 m2.
    [Show full text]
  • Findings of Inquest Into the Death of Sean Sargent
    CORONERS COURT OF QUEENSLAND FINDINGS OF INQUEST CITATION: Inquest into the disappearance of Sean Sargent TITLE OF COURT: Coroners Court JURISDICTION: Brisbane FILE NO: 2013/137 DELIVERED ON: 25 October 2017 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATES: 13 December 2016; 21 February 2017; 8 – 12 May 2017; 20 – 22 September 2017 FINDINGS OF: John Hutton CATCHWORDS: Coroners: inquest, missing person, Army Officer, civilian police and military police investigations REPRESENTATION: Counsel Assisting: Peter De Waard (Coroners Court of Queensland) Thomas Sargent and Nancy Anderson: Matthew Holmes (instructed by (Father and sister of missing person) Taylors Solicitors) Senior Sergeant Shayne Maxwell: Adrian Braithwaite (instructed by(Initial lead police investigator) by Gilshenan and Luton Legal Practice) Queensland Police Service: Mark O’Brien (Queensland Police Legal Service) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS REQUIRED BY SS. 43(2) and (4) ......................................................................................................4 EVIDENCE, DISCUSSION AND GENERAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH ...............................................4 Move to Australia .................................................................................................................................................4 The death of Sean’s mother when he was 16 .................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Joint Approach Past, Present and Future
    Australia’s Joint Approach Past, Present and Future Joint Studies Paper Series No. 1 Tim McKenna & Tim McKay This page is intentionally blank AUSTRALIA’S JOINT APPROACH PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE by Tim McKenna & Tim McKay Foreword Welcome to Defence’s Joint Studies Paper Series, launched as we continue the strategic shift towards the Australian Defence Force (ADF) being a more integrated joint force. This series aims to broaden and deepen our ideas about joint and focus our vision through a single warfighting lens. The ADF’s activities have not existed this coherently in the joint context for quite some time. With the innovative ideas presented in these pages and those of future submissions, we are aiming to provoke debate on strategy-led and evidence-based ideas for the potent, agile and capable joint future force. The simple nature of ‘joint’—‘shared, held, or made by two or more together’—means it cannot occur in splendid isolation. We need to draw on experts and information sources both from within the Department of Defence and beyond; from Core Agencies, academia, industry and our allied partners. You are the experts within your domains; we respect that, and need your engagement to tell a full story. We encourage the submission of detailed research papers examining the elements of Australian Defence ‘jointness’—officially defined as ‘activities, operations and organisations in which elements of at least two Services participate’, and which is reliant upon support from the Australian Public Service, industry and other government agencies. This series expands on the success of the three Services, which have each published research papers that have enhanced ADF understanding and practice in the sea, land, air and space domains.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTACT RAR Pages 78-80.Indd
    In the early 1980s, the Army began to pay more attention to the northern regions of the nation and THE PILBARA REGIMENT eventually raised Regional Force Surveillance Units, The Pilbara Regiment evolved out of the 5th Independent based on a squadron/troop structure, in the Northern Rifl e Company, which was raised on 26 January 1982. Territory, Western Australia, and north Queensland. RFSUs The fi rst soldiers were enlisted into the unit at Tom Price were created with the aim of fi lling a gap in the ground and Newman in March 1982. At that time, the company surveillance capability of Australia’s northern defence. headquarters comprised fi ve Regular members who It was recognised that a force operating in this austere formed initially at Campbell Barracks, Swanbourne, in environment would require special knowledge and skills Perth, then moved to Port Hedland in December 1982. UNITS that regular forces do not readily possess and so, a key The unit remained an Independent Rifl e Company until A patrolman is feature of the RFSU concept was the valuable contribution 26 January 1985 when it was converted to a Regional self-suffi cient that Indigenous people could make to the Defence of Force Surveillance Unit to provide a reconnaissance and and must be Australia, as they did during WWII. surveillance capability in the Pilbara region of Western capable of Many Indigenous communities are located in remote Australia – and so became The Pilbara Regiment. areas or close to remote vital assets and, as such, can The unit badge depicts an emu over crossed .303 working in provide invaluable local knowledge to RFSU patrols rifl es with the Sturt’s Desert Pea forming the surround, small groups, operating right across the north and west of the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the First AIF: a Brief Guide
    Last updated August 2021 Understanding the First AIF: A Brief Guide This document has been prepared as part of the Royal Australian Historical Society’s Researching Soldiers in Your Local Community project. It is intended as a brief guide to understanding the history and structure of the First Australian Imperial Force (AIF) during World War I, so you may place your local soldier’s service in a more detailed context. A glossary of military terminology and abbreviations is provided on page 25 of the downloadable research guide for this project. The First AIF The Australian Imperial Force was first raised in 1914 in response to the outbreak of global war. By the end of the conflict, it was one of only three belligerent armies that remained an all-volunteer force, alongside India and South Africa. Though known at the time as the AIF, today it is referred to as the First AIF—just like the Great War is now known as World War I. The first enlistees with the AIF made up one and a half divisions. They were sent to Egypt for training and combined with the New Zealand brigades to form the 1st and 2nd Divisions of the Australia and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC). It was these men who served on Gallipoli, between April and December 1915. The 3rd Division of the AIF was raised in February 1916 and quickly moved to Britain for training. After the evacuation of the Gallipoli peninsula, 4th and 5th Divisions were created from the existing 1st and 2nd, before being sent to France in 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE in the AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE: TOWARDS a UNIQUE SOLUTION Brigadier Peter J. Dunn, AM Master of Defence S
    ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE IN THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE: TOWARDS A UNIQUE SOLUTION Brigadier Peter J. Dunn, AM Master of Defence Studies Sub-Thesis University College The University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy 1994 CONTENTS PARTS 1 PRINCIPAL CHANGES IN AUSTRALIA'S MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE SINCE THE 1950s 1 2 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE THEORY AND REVIEWS OF THE ADF 16 3 A CHANGING ORGANISATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE ADF- THE NEED TO FOCUS ON "CORE BUSINESS" 27 4 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE FOR MORE EFFECTIVE ADF OPERATIONS 45 5 CONCLUSIONS 68 BIBLIOGR.\PHY 74 FIGURES 1 LOCBI IN THE PRE-BAKER STUDY ADF 32 2 LOCBI IN THE POST- BAKER STUDY ADF 33 3 OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY IN THE ADF STRUCTURE 42 4 MODEL ONE ADF ORGANISATION 53 5 MODEL TWO ADF ORGANISATION 57 6 MODEL THREE ADF ORGANISATION 66 Ill ABSTR.4CT The Australian Defence organisation has been the subject of almost constant review since the 1950s. The first of these major reviews, the Morshead Review was initiated in 1957. This review coincided with the growing realisation that Australia had to become more self reliant in defence matters. The experience of World War Two had shown that total reliance on "great and powerful friends" was a dangerous practice and self reliance dictated that Australia's military forces would have to act together in a joint environment. Australia's system of military command had to be capable of producing effective policies and planning guidance to met the new demands of independent joint operations. Successive reviews aimed at moving the Australian Defence Forces toward a more joint organisation have resulted in major changes to the higher defence machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Australia's Involvement in Peacekeeping Operations
    Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Inquiry into Australia’s involvement in Peacekeeping Operations; 24 July 2007 Responses to questions taken on notice from the Department of Defence Index of responses to Questions taken on Notice Questions taken on notice during the hearing 1 ADF Peacekeeping Centre 2 ADF language capability 3 ADF language training Written questions received following the hearing W1 Assessing support for peacekeeping operations W2 Additional Army battalions W3 INTERFET leadership W4 Coordination with the UN W5 Coordination with the AFP W6 Division of roles with the AFP W7 Coordination with AusAID W8 Australian Training Support Team East Timor – relationship with other deployed forces W9 Australian Training Support Team East Timor – situational awareness W10 Australian Training Support Team East Timor – chain of command W11 Australian Training Support Team East Timor – legal status W12 Australian Training Support Team East Timor – lessons learnt W13 Medication for ADF personnel W14 Post-deployment medical care W15 Australian Training Support Team East Timor – classification and conditions of service W16 Pre-deployment training W17 Health awareness W18 Post-deployment debriefing W19 UN Senior Mission Leadership courses W20 ADF Peacekeeping Centre W21 ADF Peacekeeping Centre W22 Civil-Military Coordination W23 ADF investigations W24 Lessons learnt W25 Health literacy among peacekeepers W26 Peacekeeping health study W27 Medical records W28 Classification of service W29 Australian Peacekeeping Medal W30 Australian War Memorial Roll of Honour - 1 - Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Inquiry into Australia’s involvement in Peacekeeping Operations; 24 July 2007 Responses to questions taken on notice from the Department of Defence Question 1 ADF Peacekeeping Centre How many people work at the Australian Defence Force Peacekeeping Centre? RESPONSE The authorised establishment of full-time staff at the ADF Peacekeeping Centre is currently two.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Army Journal Is Published by Authority of the Chief of Army
    Australian Army Winter edition 2014 Journal Volume XI, Number 1 • What Did We Learn from the War in Afghanistan? • Only the Strong Survive — CSS in the Disaggregated Battlespace • Raising a Female-centric Battalion: Do We Have the Nerve? • The Increasing Need for Cyber Forensic Awareness and Specialisation in Army • Reinvigorating Education in the Australian Army The Australian Army Journal is published by authority of the Chief of Army The Australian Army Journal is sponsored by Head Modernisation and Strategic Planning, Australian Army Headquarters © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 This journal is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review (as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968), and with standard source credit included, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Contributors are urged to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in their articles; the Editorial Advisory Board accepts no responsibility for errors of fact. Permission to reprint Australian Army Journal articles will generally be given by the Editor after consultation with the author(s). Any reproduced articles must bear an acknowledgment of source. The views expressed in the Australian Army Journal are the contributors’ and not necessarily those of the Australian Army or the Department of Defence. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise for any statement made in this journal. ISSN 1448-2843 Editorial Advisory Board Prof Jeffrey Grey LTGEN Peter Leahy, AC (Retd) MAJGEN Elizabeth Cosson, AM (Retd) Dr John Blaxland BRIG Justin Kelly, AM (Retd) MAJGEN Michael Smith, AO (Retd) Dr Albert Palazzo Mrs Catherine McCullagh Dr Roger Lee RADM James Goldrick (Retd) Prof Michael Wesley AIRCDRE Anthony Forestier (Retd) Australian Army Journal Winter, Volume XI, No 1 CONTENTS CALL FOR PAPERS.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFORCE Soldiers Receive Operational Service Medals
    NORFORCE soldiers receive Operational Service Medals 1 Fifteen NORFORCE* soldiers have been presented the Operational Service Medal for their service on long-range patrols in northern Australia, as part of Operation RESOLUTE. Operation RESOLUTE is the Australian Defence Force’s (ADF) contribution to the whole-of-government effort to protect Australia’s borders and offshore maritime interests Formed in 1981, NORFORCE is one of three Regional Force Surveillance Units (RFSUs) employed in the surveillance and reconnaissance of the remote areas of northern Australia, and its coastline. In the unlikely event of the invasion of northern Australia, NORFORCE and the other RFSUs would operate in a ‘stay behind’ capacity. 2 Receiving their medal at a parade in Darwin on Sunday 7 July 2013, the soldiers are the first of 29 NORFORCE personnel, awarded the medal. The Minister for Defence, Science and Personnel, Warren Snowdon, joined the Unit’s Honorary Colonel and Administrator of the Northern Territory, the Honourable Sally Thomas AM, at the presentation ceremony which marked the 32nd anniversary of the raising of NORFORCE. 3 “Since its formation in 1981, the men and women of the North West Mobile Force have played a crucial role in Australia’s multi-agency border protection activities,” Mr Snowdon said. According to the minister, many of NORFORCE’s soldiers come from remote communities in the region, and Australia relies on their local knowledge and contacts to keep our borders secure. As many soldiers patrol the areas where they are from, a great trust has developed between this regiment and remote Aboriginal communities. ”Today we recognise and thank them for their valuable contribution to Australia’s border security, with this award providing appropriate recognition to all those officers patrolling in often difficult conditions.” he said.
    [Show full text]