DOCSLIB.ORG

Sapper – 2015 1 Sapper 2015 Australian Sapper Is the Annual Magazine of the Royal Australian Engineers, Published by Authority of the Head of Corps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sapper – 2015 1 Sapper 2015 Australian Sapper Is the Annual Magazine of the Royal Australian Engineers, Published by Authority of the Head of Corps Australian Australian Sapper – 2015 1 sapper 2015 Australian Sapper is the annual magazine of the Royal Australian Engineers, published by authority of the Head of Corps. Copyright Text and images in this publication are sourced from the Department of Defence and are copyright of the Commonwealth of Australia unless otherwise credited. Enquiries regarding the use of material in this publication should be directed to the Editor. Contributors are urged to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in their articles; the Editorial Board accepts no responsibility for errors of fact. The views expressed in this publication are the contributors’ and not necessarily those of the Royal Australian Engineers, the Australian Army or the Department of Defence. ISSN: 1449-4140 Editorial board Editor-in-Chief: Brigadier Wayne Budd AM, CSC Editor: Major Craig Clunas Graphic Design: Mr George Petrovski Contact the editor: [email protected] Cover. Sapper Luke Matthews of 3 CER, works to clear debris with a skid steer loader in the aftermath of Tropical Cylone Marcia as part of the Emergency Support Force (ESF) operating in the remote community Contents Message from the Head of Corps Royal Australian Engineers ....................................................... 4 Message from the Corps Sergeant Major Royal Australian Engineers ............................................. 6 The Royal Australian Engineers Foundation ................................................................................... 7 Force Engineer Branch .................................................................................................................. 8 Modernising Manoeuvre Support capability ................................................................................. 10 ....................................................................... 12 Directorate of Soldier Career Management - Army ...................................................................... 13 RAE Trades and Training .............................................................................................................. 14 School of Military Engineering ...................................................................................................... 16 Construction Troop - Armament and Construction Wing ALTC .................................................... 21 Operations .................................................................................................................................. 22 Exercises .................................................................................................................................... 26 Sapper SITREP 1st Combat Engineer Regiment ................................................................................................... 30 2nd Combat Engineer Regiment .................................................................................................. 33 3rd Combat Engineer Regiment ................................................................................................... 34 5th Engineer Regiment 36 6th Engineer Support Regiment .................................................................................................. 38 8th Engineer Regiment ................................................................................................................ 40 11th Engineer Regiment .............................................................................................................. 41 19th Chief Engineer Works .......................................................................................................... 42 22nd Engineer Regiment ............................................................................................................ 46 1st Topographic Support Squadron ............................................................................................. 48 3rd Field Squadron ...................................................................................................................... 50 Special Operations Engineer Regiment ........................................................................................ 52 Personnel matters ....................................................................................................................... 54 The Corps’ Museum .................................................................................................................... 56 Engineers at Gallipoli – 1915 ........................................................................................................ 58 From mud models to ROC maps ................................................................................................. 67 Modernisation of Army’s geospatial and multimedia capabilities ................................................... 68 The Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Agency ................................................................................. 70 High-risk search for relevance ..................................................................................................... 72 ............................................................................................................. 74 UNTAG reunion .......................................................................................................................... 76 Return to Gallipoli ........................................................................................................................ 78 4 Australian Sapper – 2015 Message from the Head of Corps Royal Australian Engineers BRIG Wayne Budd AM, CSC I am delighted to be able to write to you an annual Corps dinner. The reasons for our again in 2015. Much has happened this Corps traditions can be quite small but each year and the tempo of activities remains has a part in the esprit de corps that sets our high. In my engagements in Canberra great Corps apart from others. I continue to hear others talk about the When I look to the activity of units this year, Corps work and their admiration for what I see the continuing cycle of very good you achieve. Well done to everyone. training events upon which we build our skill. 2015 has been a year for considering our There is nothing more important than good heritage. The 100th anniversary of the training to understand our role in support Gallipoli landings was large in the publics of the Army when we need to deploy on awareness. Many of you may have seen our operations. Alas, our global operational ‘60 Minutes’ program special on the 1st Field commitments have not decreased, despite Company Engineers who, as I would contend some hopes for a more stable worldly from the available research material, lead environment. This makes our training and the troops ashore on the morning of 25 April readiness all the more important in being 1915. Ms Catherine Job, an experienced able to meet emerging operational needs. journalist, had an uncle in 1st Field Company The future development of Corps capabilities Engineers that morning - Sapper Cleve remains aligned with strategic level actions. Paige. Sapper Paige died that morning Delivering Army’s Initiatives is the term we are now using to describe the work of Company Engineers buried in the Shrapnel building on Beersheba. This work is about Valley cemetery on the Gallipoli Peninsula. In trying to understand what happened to her uncle, Catherine did an enormous and implementing a joint approach to some amount of research and has produced a capability. Further Army developments are substantial new amount of understanding locked in the cycle of the new Defence White about the sappers at and in the lead up Paper, the accompanying Force Structure to Gallipoli. In fact her work has revealed Review and the implementation of the Force the existence of more than 30 personal Disposition Review outcomes. You should diaries still held by families of members of understand that the appointment of our new the 1st Field Company Engineers. I thank Defence Minister, a new Chief of Army and Catherine for her passion and work and Government budget considerations will impact welcome her to the extended Corps family. the timing for release of all this eagerly awaited strategic guidance. In June this year I had the honour of accompanying a large group of old Sappers Despite the wait for some guidance, we have been busy with our own unit movements. trip was timed to coincide with the 100th Following 2 CER’s movement in to new lines anniversary of the completion of Watson last year, the move of the School of Military Pier by our sappers on 18 June 1915. The Engineering to Holsworthy was completed in completion of this pier by the men of 2nd April this year. The new ‘Home of the Corps’ Filed Company Engineers and probably has fantastic facilities which will enhance others under the command of Lieutenant Stan our delivery of training. While it was sad to Watson, provided the catalyst for a dugout leave the old Casula site, I am sure as you dinner which sparked a Corps tradition for visit the new School you will appreciate the Australian Sapper – 2015 5 investment made by Government in our capability. The new Museum is a must visit activity. 9 Field Squadron also moved back to Darwin from Edinburgh, collocating 1 CER as a Regiment again. Additionally, with the Sod Turning ceremony for the relocation of 17th Const Squadron conducted on 10 December in Amberley, a very long overdue facility renewal and relocation will await the Army. He served as a Representative the squadron in about 12 months time. Colonel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3: Australian Force Structure, Interoperability and Intelligence
    3 Australian force structure, interoperability and intelligence Introduction 3.1 The Australian Defence Force (ADF) remains primarily structured for operations in defence of Australia1, yet it is increasingly involved in coalition operations with US forces, supporting Australia’s wider interests and objectives beyond our immediate neighbourhood. An ongoing challenge for the ADF is to determine the most effective way it can contribute both to potential operations in Defence of Australia, and the increasingly more demanding operations beyond our immediate neighbourhood. 3.2 The moderate levels of conventional threat in Australia’s immediate region, linked with the low likelihood of a conventional attack on Australia, compared to the high threats faced by the ADF when deployed to locations like Iraq and Afghanistan raises questions about the suitability of Australia’s force structure. Evidence to the inquiry is divided over whether adjustments to force structure, as a result of coalition operations a long way from Australia, are justified. 3.3 A number of force structure determinants are emerging from Australia’s recent involvement in coalition operations. The key determinant for conducting coalition operations remains, however, the ability to be interoperable with our allies in a range of key areas. The importance of interoperability to ADF operations will be examined and the key issues raised in evidence will be discussed. 1 Australian Government, Defence 2000 – Our Future Defence Force, p. XI. 24 AUSTRALIA’S DEFENCE RELATIONS WITH THE US 3.4 The final section of the chapter examines the significance of intelligence sharing between Australia and the US. The discussion will explore the key benefits and disadvantages of our intelligence sharing arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brisbane Line
    1 The Brisbane Line A publication of the Royal United Service Institute Queensland Inc. Promoting Australia’s National Security & Defence A Constituent Body of the Royal United Services Institute of Australia ABN: 91 025 331 202 Tel: (07) 3233 4420 Victoria Barracks, Brisbane QLD 4000 (07) 3233 4616 Correspondence to: Email: [email protected] Victoria Barracks Brisbane Web: www.rusi.org.au ENOGGERA QLD 4051 Patron: Her Excellency, the Governor of Qld, Ms Penelope Wensley, AC Vice Patrons: VOL: 1 ISSUE: 4 MAJGEN S.Smith, DSC , AM AIRCDRE T. Innes CMDR P.Tedman, DSM, ADC, RAN November 2013 Commissioner I. Stewart, APM Management Committee: PRESIDENT’S REPORT President: AIRCDRE Andrew Kilgour, AM Vice Pres (Ops) SQNLDR John Forrest, RFD (Ret’d) Vice Pres (Admin) Mr Peter Mapp Welcome to the November issue of the RUSI Hon. Secretary LTCOL Ian Willoughby, (Ret’d) Hon. Treasurer Mr Barry Dinneen, FCA, FTIA, JP(Qual) Qld newsletter ‘The Brisbane Line’. This will be Hon. Librarian LTCOL Dal Anderson, RFD, ED (Ret’d) the last one for 2013 and a fitting close to a good Asst Sec (Publicity) Mr Duncan McConnell Committee : LTCOL Russell Linwood, ASM year for RUSIQ. Our lectures from August CAPT Neville Jolly (Ret’d) onwards will be reproduced in this issue and the Mr Sean Kenny, ASM Editor Brisbane Line: Mrs Mary Ross February 2014 issue. Inaugural President 1892-94: Our Annual General meeting was held on MAJGEN J F Owen, Commander Qld Defence Force Wednesday, 18 September 2013 following the Past Presidents: monthly lecture. I am pleased to announce that 2009-11 AIRCDRE P W Growder the Committee was elected again for the next 12 2006-09 BRIG W J A Mellor DSC, AM 2003-06 GPCAPT R C Clelland AM months – I look forward to working with the 2001-03 MAJGEN J C Hartley AO team again.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicals and Recurring Documents
    PERIODICALS AND RECURRING DOCUMENTS May 2012 Legend A ANNUAL S-M SEMI-MONTHLY D DAILY BI-M BI-MONTHLY W WEEKLY Q QUARTERLY BI-W BI-WEEKLY TRI-A TRI-ANNUAL M MONTHLY IRR IRREGULAR S-A SEMI-ANNUAL A ACADEME. (BI-M) 1985-1989 ACADEMY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. PROCEEDINGS. (IRR) 1960-1991 (MFILM 1975-1980) (MFICHE 1981-1982) ACQUISITION REVIEW QUARTERLY. (Q) 1994-2003 CONTINUED BY DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL. AD ASTRA-TO THE STARS. (M) 1989-1992 ADA. (Q) 1991-1997 FORMERLY AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY. ADF: AFRICA DEFENSE FORUM. (Q) 2008- ADVANCE. (A) 1986-1994 ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. SEE S.A.M. ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. ADVISOR. (Q) 1974-1978 FORMERLY JOURNAL OF NAVY CIVILIAN MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. ADVOCATE. (BI-M) 1982-1984 - 1 - AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1977-1978 CONTINUED BY AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1979-1986 FORMERLY AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. AEROSPACE. (Q) 1963-1987 AEROSPACE AMERICA. (M) 1984-1998 FORMERLY ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE SCIENCE. (Q) 1990-1991 FORMERLY DEFENSE SCIENCE. AEROSPACE HISTORIAN. (Q) 1965-1988 FORMERLY AIRPOWER HISTORIAN. CONTINUED BY AIR POWER HISTORY. AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL. (BI-M) 1967-1981 FORMERLY AIR FORCE SPACE DIGEST INTERNATIONAL. AEROSPACE MEDICINE. (M) 1973-1974 CONTINUED BY AVIATION SPACE AND EVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE. AEROSPACE POWER JOURNAL. (Q) 1999-2002 FORMERLY AIRPOWER JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL. AEROSPACE SAFETY. (M) 1976-1980 AFRICA REPORT. (BI-M) 1967-1995 (MFICHE 1979-1994) AFRICA TODAY. (Q) 1963-1990; (MFICHE 1979-1990) 1999-2007 AFRICAN SECURITY. (Q) 2010- AGENDA. (M) 1978-1982 AGORA.
    [Show full text]
  • BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION % ■I960 Border Roads Organisation Constituted with Maj Gen
    CHRONICLE OF IMPORTANT EVENTS IN MILITARY ENGINEERING IN INDIA Although M ilitary Engineering was well known in ancient, medieval and pre-British India, as evidenced by the innumerable constructions such as forts and moats all over the country, the chronology of these developments has not been established. The developments during the B ritish period are given below BRITISH PERIOD 1 671 The first M ilitary Engineer in India was appointed by the East India Company, in Bombay, He was Colonel Herman Bake, and was designated "Engineer and Su.y^e.yar' General” of the Island of Bombay. 1672 The first uniform appeared in Bombay, 1726 Surveyor of Works (possibly the first) appointed in B o m b a y , 1750 Appointment of “Engineer General” was created, 1755 Though M ilitary Engineers had taken part in several campaigns earlier, it was only this year that they were officially recognised as Combat O fficers, in addition to being Technical Experts, « ~ 1777 Company of Pioneer Laskers was raised in Bombay, 18 Field Company traces its origin to it and is possibly the oldest Company of the Corps of Engineers, 1780 Madras Sapers formed at Madras, 1799 "Engineer Brigade” employed at Seringapatam, 1803 The pontoon made its first appearance, inspired by local boats used by the Mahratta armies, 1818 Bengal Sappers formed at Allahabad, 1820 Bombay Sappers formed, 1831 The term “Corps of Sappers & Miners” first used, 1847 Thomason College of Civil Engineering was established with a Bengal Sapper as its first principal. 1870 First telegraph section was raised by Bengal Sappers, 1885 Battalion Organisation of ”Sa|>pers & Miners” was abolished.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the 90 YEARS of the RAAF
    90 YEARS OF THE RAAF - A SNAPSHOT HISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defence, the Royal Australian Air Force or the Government of Australia, or of any other authority referred to in the text. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise, for any statements made in this document. Release This document is approved for public release. Portions of this document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 90 years of the RAAF : a snapshot history / Royal Australian Air Force, Office of Air Force History ; edited by Chris Clark (RAAF Historian). 9781920800567 (pbk.) Australia. Royal Australian Air Force.--History. Air forces--Australia--History. Clark, Chris. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Office of Air Force History. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Development Centre. 358.400994 Design and layout by: Owen Gibbons DPSAUG031-11 Published and distributed by: Air Power Development Centre TCC-3, Department of Defence PO Box 7935 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 AUSTRALIA Telephone: + 61 2 6266 1355 Facsimile: + 61 2 6266 1041 Email: [email protected] Website: www.airforce.gov.au/airpower Chief of Air Force Foreword Throughout 2011, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has been commemorating the 90th anniversary of its establishment on 31 March 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • INFANTRYMAN August 2015
    INFANTRYMAN The Journal of the RAR Association SA August 2015 Keeping the Spirit Alive ANZAC Centenary Memorial Garden Walk project a long hard trek any of you would be aware of ANZAC MCentenary Memorial Garden Walk project which, to the best of our knowledge, has been on the wish list drawing board for about nine years. Not wishing to bore you with the detailed financial arrangements however it is a joint effort by A distinguished 7RAR Association marching on ANZAC the Federal and State Governments, the Adelaide City Day. For those less observant notice they are all dressed Council and Government House. This, as you can in collar, tie and coats out of respect for their lost mates imagine, has taken an enormous amount of time and and the occasion. effort to finally pull together where all stakeholders is like a goat track. The old green tin fence containing including veterans have been consulted and some basic the Government House grounds looks like the back of design elements taking shape. a warehouse. The view to the Torrens and the Parade Ground is fragmented. Overall much will be done through The walk will start at the National War Memorial on North this project to improve the aesthetics and feel of the Terrace and finish at the end where the current footpath whole of the Kintore Avenue and the eastern boundary of approaches the Avenue of Honour and Torrens Parade Government House. Ground. The Governor of South Australia, His Excellency the Honorable Hieu Van Le AO, has relinquished 10 It is proposed that only the three services and theatres of metres of the eastern gardens abutting Kintore Avenue war will be incorporated with the lovely old Dardanelles for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Chapters 4-7 Burns
    76 CHAPTER 4 THE REALITY BEHIND THE BRISBANE LINE ALLEGATIONS Curtin lacked expertise in defence matters. He did not understand the duties or responsibilities of military commanders and never attended Chiefs of Staff meetings, choosing to rely chiefly on the Governments public service advisers. Thus Shedden established himself as Curtins chief defence adviser. Under Curtin his influence was far greater than 1 it had ever been in Menzies day. Curtins lack of understanding of the role of military commanders, shared by Forde, created misunderstandings and brought about refusal to give political direction. These factors contributed to events that underlay the Brisbane Line controversy. Necessarily, Curtin had as his main purpose the fighting and the winning of the war. Some Labor politicians however saw no reason why the conduct of the war should prevent Labor introducing social reforms. Many, because of their anti-conscriptionist beliefs, were unsympathetic 2 to military needs. Conversely, the Army Staff Corps were mistrustful of their new masters. The most influential of their critics was Eddie Ward, the new Minister for Labour and National Service. His hatred of Menzies, distrust of the conservative parties, and suspicion of the military impelled him towards endangering national security during the course of the Brisbane Line controversy. But this lay in the future in the early days of the Curtin Government. Not a great deal changed immediately under Curtin. A report to Forde by Mackay on 27 October indicated that appreciations and planning for local defence in Queensland and New South Wales were based on the assumption that the vital area of Newcastle-Sydney-Port Kembla had priority in defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Divisional Organization, 1914-1918
    Russian Divisional Organization 1914-1918 Imperial Guard 1st Guard Infantry Division Preobragenski Guard Infantry Regiment Semenov Guard Infantry Regiment Ismailov Guard Infantry Regiment Guard Jager Regiment 2nd Guard Infantry Division Moscow Guard Infantry Regiment Guard Grenadier Infantry Regiment Pavlov Guard Infantry Regiment Finland Guard Infantry Regiment 3rd Guards (Warsaw) Infantry Division Lithuania Guard Infantry Regiment Kexholm Guard Infantry Regiment St. Petersburg Guard Infantry Regiment Guard Rifle Division 1st Guard Rifle Regiment "Strelkovyi Evo Velichestva" 2nd Guard Rifle Regiment "Tsarskoe Selo" 3rd Guard Rifle Regiment "Strelkovyi Ego Velichestva" 4th Guard Rifle Regiment "Strelkovyi Imperatorskoi Familii" 3rd Finland Rifle Battalion 1st Guard Cavalry Division Chevalier Guard Regiment Horse Guard Regiment Tsar (Emperor) Guard Regiment Tsarina (Empress) Guard Regiment 2nd Guard Cavalry Division Horse Grenadier Guard Regiment Tsarina Guard Uhlan Regiment Guard Dragoon Regiment Tsar Guard Hussar Regiment 3rd Guard Cavalry Division Tsar Guard Uhlan Regiment Grodno Guard Hussar Regiment Tsar Guard Cossack Regiment Combined Guard Cossack Regiment Kuban Warsaw Division Cossack's (2 sqns) Kuban Guard Cossack Regiment (2 sqns) Terek Guard Cossack Regiment (2 sqns) Tsararevich's Ataman Cossack Guard Regiment Ural Guards Sotnia Guard Artillery 1st Guard Artillery Brigade (1-6th Btrys) 2nd Guard Artillery Brigade (1-6th Btrys) 3rd Guard Artillery Brigade (1-6th Btrys) Guard Horse Artillery Brigade (1-6th Btrys) Other Guard Guard
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Parks and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation 2019 Explanatory Note
    Marine Parks and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation 2019 Marine Parks and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation 2019 Explanatory notes for SL 2019 No. 64 made under the Marine Parks Act 2004 State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 General Outline Short title Marine Parks and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation 2019 Authorising law Sections 25 and 150 of the Marine Parks Act 2004 Section 165 of the State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 Policy objectives and the reasons for them The policy objectives of the Marine Parks and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation 2019 (Amendment Regulation) are to amend the: 1. Marine Parks (Great Sandy) Zoning Plan 2017 to create a new designated area for the wreck of the ex-HMAS Tobruk in the Great Sandy Marine Park to allow for ongoing management of the dive site; and to correct mapping errors in the statutory maps of zones and designated areas for the marine park; 2. State Penalties Enforcement Regulation 2014 to prescribe Penalty Infringement Notice offences for the ex-HMAS Tobruk designated area; 3. Marine Parks (Declaration) Regulation 2006, the Marine Parks (Great Barrier Reef Coast) Zoning Plan 2004 and the Marine Parks (Moreton Bay) Zoning Plan 2008 to clarify the intent of the ‘mangrove line’ marine park boundary definitions; 4. Marine Parks (Moreton Bay) Zoning Plan 2008 and the Marine Parks (Great Sandy) Zoning Plan 2017 grey nurse shark designated area provisions to remove reference to the withdrawn Australian Standard AS 4005.1-2000 Training and certification of recreational divers and to ensure consistency between these provisions in both zoning plans; 5. Marine Parks (Moreton Bay) Zoning Plan 2008 to make a minor correction in the entry and use provisions for marine national park zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Heritage Register
    Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Housing Australia Annual Report 2013–14: Section 2
    02 Portfolio provisioning and management Defence housing requirement > Property provisioning Portfolio management > Major developments 02 Objectives • Housing supplied and managed effectively to meet Defence requirements • Good stakeholder management and public relations Key performance indicator Target Achievement Housing provisioned for Defence against agreed >98.5% 99.4% Portfolio provisioning and management Portfolio provisioning provisioning plan Defence member satisfaction with property 80% 89% Major outcomes 01 02 03 Provided a total Constructed and Achieved overall lease portfolio of 17,590 purchased 662 new additions of 1,537 properties, which met dwellings for Defence against a Corporate the key performance families and a further Plan target of 1,522. measure for housing 120 apartments provisioning. for MCA. 20 Defence Housing Australia 04 05 06 02 Acquired development Continued work on Gained UDIA six leaf sites in Thornton, residential developments EnviroDevelopment Hunter Valley and including 13 sites in certification for Edmondson Park NSW worth $502.9 six residential (NSW), Rockingham million, one site in ACT developments. and Fremantle (WA), worth $46.6 million, Raceview, Ipswich (QLD) 15 sites in QLD worth and the Defence site $433.9 million, six sites in 2CRU, Darwin (NT). NT worth $574.6 million, four sites in WA worth and management Portfolio provisioning $102.4 million, one site in VIC worth $14.0 million and one site in SA worth $30.5 million. 07 08 09 Achieved a net margin Through Defence, Through Defence, for land development received Parliamentary referred the sales of $37.9 million approval for the construction of including sales from construction of 80 houses at RAAF stage three and four 50 houses on RAAF Base Darwin (NT) surplus lots at Breezes Base Tindal (NT).
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
    We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships.
    [Show full text]