DOCSLIB.ORG

The Myth of the Matching Principle As a Tax Value

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Myth of the Matching Principle As a Tax Value Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Law Faculty Articles and Essays Faculty Scholarship 1998 The Myth of the Matching Principle as a Tax Value Deborah A. Geier Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles Part of the Tax Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Original Citation Deborah A. Geier, The Myth of the Matching Principle as a Tax Value, 15 American Journal of Tax Policy 17 (Spring 1998) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Articles and Essays by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Myth of the Matching Principle as a Tax Value DEBORAH A GEIER* Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION................................................ 18 II. THE MATCHING PRINCIPLE IN FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND THE ROLE OF GAAP IN TAX ACCOUNTING........ 27 Ill. THE MATCHING PRINCIPLE IN TAX ACCOUNTING . • 41 A CAPITALIZATION, DEPRECIATION, AND THE IN­ COME-TAX VALUE...................................... 41 1. Capitalization . 42 2. Depreciation..................................... 58 B. ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING-DEDUCTIONS............. 71 1. The Anderson Case . 71 2. Financial Accounting as "Science"?......... 75 3. The Other Early Cases: Drawing the Line at "Contingent" Liabilities. 84 4. Corning to Understand the True Tax Value at Stake: The Anti-Tax Arbitrage Value and the Income-Tax Value Revis­ ited................................................ 91 5. Modern Decision.making . 102 C. ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING-INCOME................... 113 1. Prepaid Gross Receipts ............ .......... 113 2. Other Income.................................... 139 * Professor of Law, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University. I would like to thank Charlotte Crane, Calvin Johnson, Michael Lang, and George Ym for their helpful comments on an earlier draft. As several of them did not agree with positions taken in the Article, the reader should be careful in ascribing their agreement to the views discussed. I would also very much like to thank Joseph Dodge and Cliff Fleming, who were gracious enough to ask me to join with them in writing Federal Income 1b.x: Doctrine, Structure and Policy. The seeds for this Article were germinated during that project. While we do not always agree on everything, I have learned, and continue to learn, a great deal from them. Finally, I would like to thank law librarian Marie Rehmar, whose tireless help in finding some of the historical material was invaluable. 17 18 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TAX POLICY [Vol. 15:17 3. Final Thoughts.................................. 143 D. TWO-PARTY MATCHING . 152 1. In General . 152 2. Premature Accrual of Future Expenses Revisited.......................................... 158 3. Prepaid Gross Receipts Revisited........... 160 4. Final Thoughts.................................. 162 IV. CONCLUSION.................................................. 164 Those of us in the tax law business know that we are bright, engaging, and athletic; we combine animal magnetism with erudi­ tion. However, tax lawyers are lumped with accountants in the public mind, and are burdened with the images of thick specta­ cles, green eyeshades, cluttered minds, and unlimited capacities for boredom. One commentator has even stated that a "tax lawyer is a person who is good with numbers but who does not have enough personality to be an accountant."1 I. INTRODUCTION It is high time we tax lawyers did a better job of educating the world that tax law is not about financial accounting. It is important that we do so not because we dislike accountants; some very nice ones have been students in my classes. It is im­ portant because the often implicit assumption that financial ac­ counting presumptively guides tax accounting can and has un­ dermined tax values. This Article is one modest contribution in the continuing efforts toward the emancipation· of tax law from financial accounting. Those steeped in a financial accounting background often have trouble letting go of that culture when they cross over the great divide into the tax realm. Perhaps more important, those who are not steeped in financial accounting-such as judges­ often assume without reflection that financial accounting princi­ ples ought to govern tax accounting. This tendency is often the strongest when it comes to the financial accounting norm com­ monly referred to as "the matching principle." The principle that expenditures ought to be deducted in the same period as the income to which they relate is a sacrosanct 1. Erik M. Jensen, The Heroic Nature of Tax Lawyers, 140 U. PA. L. REv. 367, 367­ 68 (1991) (book review essay of John Grisham, The Firm) (footnotes omitted). 1998] THE MYTH OF MATCHING 19 one in the financial accounting world.2 The income tax, however, is not uniformly wedded to this matching principle. In some cases, the Code seems to require what smacks of "matching," not in the financial accounting sense described above, but in the sense that income or expenses can be deferred to the future or accelerated in order to be accounted for in the same period as offsetting deductions or inclusions. One example is the rule in section 121!3 that deductible capital losses are allowable in any year only to the extent of includable capital gain; unused losses must be deferred. Sections 163(d), 465, 469, and 1092 similarly require delay of otherwise deductible amounts to future years in which income is realized. The capitalization of expenditures that do not create or purchase a distinct asset but will produce a sig­ nificant economic benefit in future years is a similar, though distinct, manifestation of the phenomenon, as is depreciation. And the matching of inclusion and deduction between two differ­ ent taxpayers, required by sections 83(h), 267(a)(2), 483, 404(a)(5), and the original issue discount rules of sections 1271­ 1275, is yet another distinct facet of the idea. But the income tax (and cases construing it) also selectively departs from the matching principle. Prepaid services income re­ ceived by an accrual basis taxpayer must usually, though not al­ ways, be included in the year of receipt under current law, even though the related expenses will not be incurred (and deducted) until future years.4 Similarly, the "economic performance" re­ quirement of section 461(h) may result in what accountants would argue is a "mismatch" of income and deduction.5 These income tax rules that require deviation from the matching principle are usually perceived by accountants as ei­ ther indefensible or as introducing unnecessary complexity to the tax accounting world. 6 They are also often perceived as un­ fair, in that they sometimes combine to create a "one-way street" in favor of the fisc. 7 Accountants typically argue that tax 2. For a fuller description of the matching principle, see infra notes 25-29 and ac­ companying text. 3. All references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, unless otherwise noted. 4. See infra notes 319-414 and accompanying text. 5. See infra notes 255-288 and accompanying text. 6. See infra notes 31-37 and accompanying text. 7. See William L. Raby & Burgess J.W. Raby, '.Abuse of Discretion' and 'Clearly Re­ flect Income', 71 TAX NCYl'Es 227, 229 (Apr. 8, 1996) (chastising "indiscriminate IRS at­ tempts to switch all and sundry to methods of accounting that will maximize the Trea­ 20 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TAX POLICY [Vol. 15:17 accounting should simply follow financial accounting.8 Even some tax lawyers, policymakers, and judges (and justices), insuf­ ficiently conscious of the tax values that should inform tax ac­ counting and with no formal background in financial accounting, are often lulled into agreement with the rhetoric of the financial accountants. As recently as 1992, for example, the Supreme Court has (unfortunately) stated: "The Code endeavors to match expenses with the revenues of the taxable period to which they are properly attributable, thereby resulting in a more accurate calculation of net income for tax purposes."9 Accounting norms can exude an enticing siren song to those insufficiently schooled in tax values. Accounting norms seem to some to be formal, tested, and have the aura of an entire profession behind them,10 which can lend them solidity in the unquestioning judge's eye. And, after all, both tax accounting and financial accounting measure "income," don't they? Nowhere does this tension between the income tax world and the world of financial accounting manifest itself so explicitly as in section 446(b), which provides that "if the [taxpayer's ac­ counting method] does not clearly reflect income, the computa­ tion of taxable income shall be made under such method as, in the opinion of the Secretary, does clearly reflect income." Under this authority, the Commissioner can challenge not only the tax­ payer's use of a particular regime of tax accounting in general, such as the cash method, the accrual method, or inventory ac­ counting, but also the taxpayer's treatment of a particular item or transaction under those methods. Most courts are quite deferential to the Commissioner's ex­ ercise of authority under this provision.11 Yet, the authority is not without limits under the statute, for it is constrained by the sury's revenue" and characterizing the IRS approach as one that "comes close to asserting that the King can do no wrong"). 8. See Harold Dubroff et al., Tux Accounting: The Relationship of Clear Refl.ection ofIncome to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, 47 ALB. L. REv. 354, 359 n.20 and 389 n.143 (1983) (both collecting authorities); Raby & Raby, supra note 7. 9. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992). 10. See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE MATCHING CONCEPT and the ADJUSTING PROCESS Objectives
    3 THE MATCHING CONCEPT AND THE ADJUSTING PROCESS objectives After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Explain how the matching concept 1 relates to the accrual basis of accounting. Explain why adjustments are neces- 2 sary and list the characteristics of adjusting entries. Journalize entries for accounts requir- 3 ing adjustment. Summarize the adjustment process 4 and prepare an adjusted trial balance. Use vertical analysis to compare finan- 5 cial statement items with each other and with industry averages. PHOTO: © PHOTODISC GREEN/GETTY IMAGES Assume that you rented an apartment last month and signed a nine-month lease. When you signed the lease agreement, you were required to pay the final month’s rent of $500. This amount is not returnable to you. You are now applying for a student loan at a local bank. The loan application re- quires a listing of all your assets. Should you list the $500 deposit as an asset? The answer to this question is “yes.” The deposit is an asset to you until you re- ceive the use of the apartment in the ninth month. A business faces similar accounting problems at the end of a period. A business must determine what assets, liabilities, and owner’s equity should be reported on its balance sheet. It must also determine what revenues and expenses should be reported on its income statement. As we illustrated in previous chapters, transactions are normally recorded as they take place. Periodically, financial statements are prepared, summarizing the effects of the transactions on the financial position and operations of the business.
    [Show full text]
  • Accrual Vs. Cash Accounting
    Accrual vs Cash One of the first steps in setting up an accurate accounting system is selecting a method of recording transactions. The two most common methods are the cash basis of accounting and the accrual basis of accounting. This article highlights the differences between these methods, and presents considerations when choosing which method is right for your organization. Cash Method Accrual Method The cash method is the simplest option, and replicates The more complex accrual method is what is required by checkbook accounting used in personal finances. Income Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). If your and expenses are recognized when the cash is transferred. organization plans to go through a financial statement au- Revenue is recorded when funds are received and expens- dit or review, it is highly recommended that the organiza- es are recorded when bills are paid, regardless of when tion adopt the accrual method so that it is in conformance the transaction was entered into between the organiza- with GAAP. Lending and funding sources also often re- tion and the donor/customer or vendor. As a result, the quire financial information be submitted using the accrual balance sheet of a cash basis organization only contains method. This method records income when it is earned cash and net assets. Receivables, prepaid expenses, paya- and expenses when they are incurred. As a result, income bles and deferred revenue are all accrual concepts ignored and all of the costs incurred in the process of earning the when using the cash method. The benefits of this method revenue are matched and recorded in the same fiscal peri- are the simplicity and a clear sense of cash flow.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting
    On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting Occasional Paper Series Center for Excellence in Accounting & Security Analysis Columbia Business School established the Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis in 2003 under the direction of Trevor Harris and Professor Stephen Penman. The Center (“CEASA”) aims to be a leading voice for independent, practical solutions for financial reporting and security analysis, promoting financial reporting that reflects economic reality and encourages investment practices that communicate sound valuations. CEASA’s mission is to develop workable solutions to issues in financial reporting and accounting policy; produce a core set of principles for equity analysis; collect and synthesize best thinking and best practices; disseminate ideas to regulators, analysts, investors, accountants and management; and promote sound research on relevant issues. Drawing on the wisdom of leading experts in academia, industry and government, the Center produces sound research and identifies best practices on relevant issues. CEASA's guiding criterion is to serve the public interest by supporting the integrity of financial reporting and the efficiency of capital markets. Located in a leading university with a mandate for independent research, CEASA is positioned to lead a discussion of issues, with an emphasis on sound conceptual thinking and without obstacles of constituency positions. More information and access to current research is available on our website at http://www.gsb.columbia.edu/ceasa/ The Center is supported by our generous sponsors: General Electric, IBM and Morgan Stanley. We gratefully acknowledge the support of these organizations that recognize the need for this center. ON THE BALANCE SHEET-BASED MODEL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING Principal Consultant Ilia D.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions to Questions for Chap 9
    CHAPTER 9 Inventories ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 01. July 24 Accounts Payable ($1,700 – $200) ....................... 1,500 Purchase Discounts ($1,500 X 2%) ................... 30 Cash ($1,500 – $30) .............................. 1,470 02. Accounts Added/Deducted Normal Balance Purchase Returns and Allowances Deducted Credit Purchase Discounts Deducted Credit Freight-in Added Debit 03. (a) X = Purchase returns and allowances and Y = Purchase discounts, or vice versa. (b) X = Freight-in. (c) X = Cost of goods purchased. (d) X = Ending merchandise inventory. 04. Agree. Effective inventory management is frequently the key to successful business operations. Management attempts to maintain sufficient quantities and types of goods to meet expected cus- tomer demand. It also seeks to avoid the cost of carrying inventories that are clearly in excess of anticipated sales. 05. Inventory items have two common characteristics: (1) they are owned by the company and (2) they are in a form ready for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. 06. Taking a physical inventory involves actually counting, weighing or measuring each kind of inven- tory on hand. Retailers, such as a hardware store, generally have thousands of different items to count. This is normally done when the store is closed. Tom will probably count items, and mark the quantity, description, and inventory number on prenumbered inventory tags. 07. (a) (1) The goods will be included in Janine Company's inventory if the terms of sale are FOB destination. (2) They will be included in Laura Company's inventory if the terms of sale are FOB ship- ping point. (b) Janine Company should include goods shipped to a consignee in its inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Comparisons of the FRF for Smestm Reporting
    Private Companies Practice Section March 2018 Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Comparisons of the FRF for SMEsTM Reporting Framework to Other Bases of Accounting s e i t i t n E d e z i S FRF - for m u i d e M d SMEs n a - ll aicpa.org/FRF-SMEs a m S F r i o na f n rk ci o al R ew eporting Fram ™ Comparisons of the FRF for SMEs Reporting Framework to Other Bases of Accounting Introduction Owner-managers of SMEs, CPAs serving SMEs, users of SME financial statements, and other stakeholders are often familiar with the tax basis of accounting and U.S. GAAP. Also, many stakeholders are following the implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standard for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) around the world as its use continues to expand and its implications for the U.S. marketplace continue to grow. As such, these stakeholders are interested in understanding how the principles and criteria included in the FRF for SMEs accounting framework compare to those other bases of accounting. To assist those stakeholders, comparisons of the FRF for SMEs accounting framework to (1) the tax basis, (2) U.S. GAAP, and (3) IFRS for SMEs are presented on the following pages. These comparisons are not all inclusive. Rather, the following comparisons are made at a high level and are intended to draw attention to differences between the FRF for SMEs accounting framework and the other bases of accounting on certain accounting and financial reporting matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management: Cash Vs. Accrual Accounting Danny Klinefelter, Dean Mccorkle and Steven Klose*
    EAG- 036 February 2017 Risk Management Series Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting Danny Klinefelter, Dean McCorkle and Steven Klose* Selecting a record-keeping system is an A business can be going broke and still generate important decision for agricultural producers. a positive cash basis income for several years The system should help with decision making in a by building accounts payable (accruing but not risky environment and calculate taxable income. paying expenses), selling assets, and not replacing Most producers keep their records with the cash capital assets as they wear out. receipts and disbursements method or with an However, most farmers and ranchers use accrual method. cash basis accounting because: 1) the accounting Either method should be acceptable for principles of an accrual system can be complex; calculating taxable income (except for corporate 2) given the cost of hiring accountants to keep taxpayers who have revenues exceeding their records, accrual accounting is more $25,000,000). However, it is not acceptable to keep expensive; and 3) cash basis accounting is more books throughout the year using one method flexible for tax planning. of accounting and then convert at year-end to another method, solely because the second Getting the Best of Both Systems method might compute taxable income more There is a process by which cash basis income favorably. and expense data can be adjusted to approximate The main difference between accrual basis and accrual income. This can be very beneficial to cash basis accounting is the time at which income producers, giving them the simplicity and tax and expenses are recognized and recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between GAAP and Statutory Accounting
    GAAP vs Statutory Accounting Every industry has a given set of principles for the preparation of financial statements. These principles define how financial transactions should be accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the statutory bodies. Two of these statutory bodies are known as GAAP and SAP. Statutory Accounting Principles, also known as SAP, are used to prepare the financial statements of insurance companies. In the United States, authorized insurers are required to prepare financial information according to SAP. These principles are designed for the insurance departments of different states to help them regulate the solvency of insurance companies. On the other hand, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP provides a common set of accounting standards, procedures and rules that are defined by the professional accountancy body. Almost every publicly traded company in the United States has adopted GAAP. These principles provide authoritative accounting standards as well as commonly accepted methods of recording and reporting accounting transactions. Companies are required to follow GAAP in order to take the investors into confidence who use financial information of the company for investment purposes. However, GAAP and SAP are not same. There are differences between these two accounting frameworks and these differences are discussed below. Difference between GAAP and Statutory Accounting Industry Difference It is mandatory for all the companies in the United States to use GAAP. When the companies file their financial reports, they are required by the Security and Exchange Commission of the U.S. to follow these Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Financial Accounting Standards Board, also known as FASB, set the GAAP rules and accounting standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue Recognition - Academic Year (Tuition & Fee Revenue, Housing Revenue & Credits, Financial Aid, and Stipend Expense) Policy
    ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Revenue Recognition - Academic Year (Tuition & Fee Revenue, Housing Revenue & Credits, Financial Aid, and Stipend Expense) Policy Approval Authority: Vice Chancellor for Finance Originally issued: May 2018 Responsible Administrator: Controller Responsible Office: Finance Current version effective as of: Enrollment Affairs’ Office November 2019 Policy Contact: Assistant Controller POLICY STATEMENT/REASON FOR POLICY All academic year tuition and fee revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense are deferred at the time of billing. The goal of this document is to define how to recognize tuition and fee revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense in accordance with general accepted accounting principles (GAAP) on a quarterly basis. THIS POLICY APPLIES TO This policy applies to all Vanderbilt financial units receiving tuition and fees revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense for the academic year. This policy does not apply to the summer term; see separate Revenue Recognition Summer Term policy. POLICY A. Entries are recorded quarterly to recognize tuition and fee revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense to ensure revenues and related expenses are properly matched when earned. B. Entries must be posted by the fourth day of close. C. Recognition Methodology Page 1 of 3 DEFINITIONS General Ledger - The general ledger contains all Vanderbilt financial transactions. Currently, the general ledger (system of record) is Oracle. Information from the general ledger is used by Vanderbilt to analyze, report, and monitor the results of the business. Tuition and fees - Tuition is money received in exchange for instruction for which the student receives course credit.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3 Adjusting the Accounts Time Period Assumption: an Assumption
    Lecture 3 Adjusting the accounts Time period assumption: An assumption that the economic life of a business can be divided into artificial time period. The time period assumption is called the periodicity assumption. Fiscal year : An accounting time period that is one year in length is a fiscal year. A fiscal year usually begins with the first day of a month and ends twelve months later on the last day of a month Accounting time periods are generally a month, a quarter, or a year. Monthly and quarterly time periods are called interim periods. Most large companies must prepare both quarterly and annual financial statements. Calendar year: An accounting period that extends from January 1 to December 31 is called the calendar year Accrual basis accounting : Under the accrual basis, companies record transactions that change a company’s financial statements in the periods in which the events occur. Under the accrual basis, revenues and expenses are recorded when they are earned, regardless of when the money is actually received or paid. This method is more commonly used than the cash method. Cash basis accounting: Under cash-basis accounting, companies record revenue when they receive cash. They record an expense when they pay out cash. The cash basis seems appealing due to its simplicity, but it often produces misleading financial statements. It fails to record revenue that a company has earned but for which it has not received the cash. Also, it does not match expenses with earned revenues. Cash-basis accounting is not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
    [Show full text]
  • The Matching Principle Prescribes
    The matching principle prescribes Continue Correct. ($44,000 (current tax) less than $4,000 (deferred tax) - $40,000 $4,000 of the estimated current tax tax relates to prepaid income, therefore, $4,000 must be deducted from tax expense and in respect of accounting profits earned next year. that, in the receipt of income, the costs incurred to receive these revenues must be reported during the same reporting period (same income reporting). This principle is central to accounting, the method required by GAAP, since the method of accounting simply reports costs when paying. The principle of comparison relates to the comparison of income recognized during this period with expenditures that resulted in income under the accounting accrual method so that the net result is fairly reported during that period. Since it is sometimes difficult to link income to the costs used to generate it, general guidelines are used to compare costs with income. The principle of conformity and cause and effect The clearest and simplest example of cost-matching with income is the cause and effect of the relationship illustrated in the value of goods sold and income. When a product is sold, the most direct cost incurred is the cost of the product. In the case of the Solar Sunglasses Store, when Solar sells sunglasses for $50, the direct cost of sunglasses incurred to create a sale was $15 paid for sunglasses. The $15 value of the goods sold is recognized with a $50 sale so that the proceeds and expenses incurred to obtain the sale are reported, or consistent, in the same period.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmasking the Matching Principle in Tax Law
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1993 Unmasking the Matching Principle in Tax Law Julie Roin Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Julie Roin, "Unmasking the Matching Principle in Tax Law," 79 Virginia Law Review 813 (1993). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNMASKING THE "MATCHING PRINCIPLE" IN TAX LAW Julie A. Roin * INTRODUTION XItr are accustomed to believing that a taxpayer's treatment of one transaction may determine the tax consequences of a later, related transaction. For example, the amount of gain a taxpayer rec- ognizes upon the disposition of an asset depends on the circumstances under which the taxpayer acquired the asset and, in particular, on the basis created as a result of that acquisition.I We are much less accus- tomed to believing that the tax consequences of a transaction should be determined by another taxpayer's treatment of the transaction. Most commentators are willing to acknowledge that "Congress is free to enact-and should enact-rules to the effect that the tax treatment of one party is in fact keyed to that of another in particulartypes of transactions." 2 But most resist the uniform application of a "'com- mon law' income-tax principle holding that the tax treatment of one '3 taxpayer determines the tax treatment of another." * Class of 1963 Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Preparing Financial Statements
    Revised Summer 2012 CHAPTER 3 PREPARING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Key Terms and Concepts to Know Accounting Period: Time Period Principle Calendar vs. Fiscal Year Accounting Cycle: Know the steps in order. Use the steps as a reference to insure that journal entries, trial balances and financial statements are prepared in the proper order. Accrual Basis Accounting: Accrual vs. Cash Basis Accounting Revenue Recognition Principle requires that revenues are reported in the period in which they are earned, regardless of when payment is received. Matching Principle requires that all expenses incurred (whether paid or not) are recorded in the same accounting period as the revenues earned as a result of these expenses. Adjusting Entries: Accrued revenues and accrued expenses Deferred revenues and deferred expenses Unbilled vs. unearned revenues Closing Process: Records the current year’s net income and dividends in retained earnings and zeros-out the balance in all revenue, expense and dividend accounts at year-end. Revenue and expense account balances are transferred into the Income Summary account. The balance in the income summary represents net income (revenues minus expenses) which is then transferred into retained earnings. Dividends are transferred directly into retained earnings, bypassing the income summary because dividends are not part of the calculation of net income and do not appear on the income statement. Profit Margin ratio and Current ratio Page 1 of 27 Revised Summer 2012 Key Topics to Know Adjusting Entries Adjusting entries are required to record internal transactions and to bring assets and liability accounts to their proper balances and record expenses or revenues in the proper accounting period.
    [Show full text]