DOCSLIB.ORG

The Foreign Service Journal, July-August 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Foreign Service Journal, July-August 2006 HONORING MORT ABRAMOWITZ SUMMER FICTION AFSA NEWS MOVES! AFSA AWARD WINNERS INSIDE $3.50 / JULY-AUGUST 2006 OREIGN ERVICE FJ O U R N A L S THE MAGAZINE FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS PROFESSIONALS TRANSFORMING DIPLOMACY A Hard Sell in Foggy Bottom? CONTENTS July-August 2006 Volume 83, No. 7-8 See p. 65 C OVER S TORY FS FICTION 19 / TRANSFORMING DIPLOMACY AT STATE DAY OF THE JACKALOPE / 39 Obtaining the necessary resources to implement A diplomatic faux pas is narrowly avoided with the transformational diplomacy will be the key test of delivery of a hefty jackalope. Secretary of State Rice’s commitment to her vision. By Brian Aggeler By Shawn Zeller RAM BALRAM’S FINAL EXAM / 44 An Indian village’s history and hope are wrapped up in the struggles of a doddering but determined old man. By Rakesh Surampudi C OLUMNS D EPARTMENTS PRESIDENT’S VIEWS / 5 LETTERS / 6 Closer State-DOD CYBERNOTES / 11 Cooperation: Building MARKETPLACE / 12 on Existing Success BOOKS / 49 IN MEMORY / 52 F EATURE By J. Anthony Holmes AFSA NEWS / 65 PEAKING UT INDEX TO 30 / HONORING AN “AGGRESSIVE INTERVENTIONIST”: S O / 15 AMBASSADOR MORTON ABRAMOWITZ Run, Lemmings, Run ADVERTISERS / 90 Last month AFSA recognized the retired By David T. Jones ambassador’s many contributions to American REFLECTIONS / 92 diplomacy and his lifetime of public service. A Deep Bow to the By Steven Alan Honley Foreign Service By Ashley Wills THE MAGAZINE FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS PROFESSIONALS OREIGN ERVICE Foreign Service Journal (ISSN 0146-3543), 2101 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037-2990 is published J O U R N A L F S monthly with a combined July/August issue by the American Foreign Service Association, a private, non-profit Editor Editorial Board STEVEN ALAN HONLEY organization. Material appearing herein represents the opinions of the writers and does not necessarily represent Senior Editor TED WILKINSON, the views of the Journal, the Editorial Board or AFSA. Writer queries and submissions are invited, preferably by SUSAN B. MAITRA CHAIRMAN e-mail. Journal subscription: AFSA Members - $13 included in annual dues; others - $40. For foreign surface mail, Associate Editor add $18 per year; foreign airmail, $36 per year. Periodical postage paid at Washington, D.C., and at additional mail- KENT C. BROKENSHIRE SHAWN DORMAN ing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to Foreign Service Journal, 2101 E Street N.W., Washington, D.C. Ad & Circulation Manager STEPHEN W. B UCK 20037-2990. Indexed by Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS). The Journal is not responsible for unsolicited ED MILTENBERGER ANTHONY S. CHAN Business Manager LILLIAN DEVALCOURT-AYALA manuscripts, photos or illustrations. Advertising inquiries are invited. The appearance of advertisements herein MIKKELA V. T HOMPSON JOSH GLAZEROFF does not imply the endorsement of the services or goods offered. FAX: (202) 338-8244 or (202) 338-6820. Art Director ILLIAM ORDAN E-MAIL: [email protected]. WEB: www.afsa.org. TELEPHONE: (202) 338-4045. © American Foreign Service CARYN SUKO SMITH W W. J Association, 2006. Printed in the U.S.A. Send address changes to AFSA Membership, 2101 E Street N.W., Editorial Intern LAURIE KASSMAN EIRENE BUSA JOYCE W. N AMDE Washington, D.C. 20037-2990. Printed on 50-percent recycled paper, of which 10 percent is post-consumer waste. Advertising Intern KAY WEBB MAYFIELD ANDRES VIDER CHRISTOPHER L. TEAL Cover and inside illustration by Brian Aggeler JULY-AUGUST 2006/FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL 3 PRESIDENT’S VIEWS Closer State-DOD Cooperation: Building on Existing Success BY J. ANTHONY HOLMES The state of the world today, cers for expanded cooperation • Establishing a joint FSI-NDU pro- and for the foreseeable future, with our military overseas is gram to train FS political advisers dictates much closer coopera- the existing State/DOD coop- (“polads”) to military commanders tion between the State and eration programs. Particularly before they go to their assignments; Defense Departments, particu- relevant are those offered at • Assigning State officers to the new larly at overseas missions. This the National Defense Univer- 10-month Counterterrorism Fellows enhanced coordination lies at sity, the premier professional program, set up three years ago to bring the heart of Secretary Rice’s military educational institution senior military and civilian officials from transformational diplomacy initiative. in the United States. Fortuitously, around the world to the U.S. to cement Regrettably, the political-military DOD is in the process of converting contacts and to acquaint them with our function in the State Department has NDU into more of a National Security interagency terrorism programs; become marginalized over the past cou- University to strengthen interagency • Setting up a working relationship ple of decades, its appeal as a specialty between the State Department’s Office has waned, and the number of FSOs in of Stabilization and Reconstruction the PM Bureau has shrunk markedly. Promoting a more and NDU’s Strategic Gaming Center. At a time when DOD is playing a much productive engagement NDU’s widely acclaimed Gaming Cen- larger role in both foreign affairs and the with the military will ter could prepare, facilitate, and host the conduct of diplomacy, it is important strategic scenarios for this State entity; that State both increase its understand- come with a price tag. • Establishing a jointly-run FSI- ing of the U.S. military’s values and cul- But it is one worth NDU program to train civilian and mil- ture and try to impart to our military an paying. itary personnel to participate in Provin- understanding of what drives State cial Reconstruction Teams in Iraq, Department approaches and why we Afghanistan and other post-conflict situ- see the world differently than they do. collaboration and increase professional ations; The reality remains that only the education to more civilians and military • Creating closer contacts between State Department sees the entire fabric officers. NDU’s three affiliated regional centers of our relations with other nations, and The State Department has long par- and the State Department by assigning only State is responsible for managing ticipated in key NDU programs, includ- a senior FSO to serve as a deputy direc- and maximizing the totality of these ing the highly valued, but limited, stu- tor at each; and relationships. While the “long war” may dent and faculty slots at the National •Extending current State Depart- dominate relations with some countries, War College and the Industrial College ment faculty assignments at NDU to it is not the only element in any of our of the Armed Forces. With the provi- two years with an option for a third. bilateral relationships. The other sion of some modest resources and While the ideas above are a mix of aspects simply have to be factored in as additional billets, NDU can play a sig- old and new, all of them would well. One example of this is the signifi- nificantly greater role in preparing State increase State/DOD understanding cance of Iran and Iraq in terms of glob- Department personnel to meet some of and cooperation. Admittedly, promot- al economic and energy interests. the new national security challenges. ing a more productive engagement An obvious place for State to focus in New initiatives worthy of considera- with the military will come with a price order to prepare Foreign Service offi- tion, according to senior State officials tag. But to advance transformational presently assigned to NDU, include: diplomacy and achieve the results J. Anthony Holmes is the president of the • Doubling the number of FSOs Secretary Rice wants, that price will American Foreign Service Association. who attend the War College and ICAF; have to be paid. I JULY-AUGUST 2006/FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL 5 LETTERS “The Other Side of the of Household who are interested in type of challenge in their Foreign Unaccompanied Tour”: participating. Service careers. For more informa- FLO Responds Once FLO receives the contact tion on FLO’s programs in support of We were pleased to see the article information, Nan, a trained social unaccompanied tours, please visit our by FSO Deborah Sisbarro (May AFSA worker, maintains regular communi- Web site at www.state.gov/m/dghr/flo, News), who served two years in Mos- cation with family members, providing or contact Nan Leininger directly at cow as a public diplomacy officer and information, referrals and guidance, [email protected] or (202) 647- extended for one year while her hus- developing programs to serve both 1076. band served in Iraq. Ms. Sisbarro adults and children, and advocating Ann DeLong Greenberg noted that being able to remain in for services as needed. The goal is to Director Moscow during this period provided create an interactive “virtual commu- Family Liaison Office continuity and stability for her family; nity” of mutually supportive families Washington, D.C. allowed her son to stay in the same who share the same situation. FLO school and maintain the same friends has reached out by developing the Support Career Development and nanny; and enabled her to contin- HomeFrontUS listserv, establishing a As a Foreign Service office man- ue working with supportive supervi- 24/7 hotline for referrals and making agement specialist who has been in sors. In addition, it was easier for the various relevant publications available the Service since 1986, I think the family to meet at a halfway point in online. Nan also presents information OMS career development plans sound Europe when her husband was able to on FLO’s support services to the DS great. However, they don’t help us take R&R. Iraq course each week. She recently much if we do not have support from However, Ms. Sisbarro expressed visited Baghdad and Riyadh to see the post management and, most of all, disappointment that, as the spouse of physical environments and speak with from our supervisors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Diplomacy Project: a US Diplomatic Service for the 21St
    AMERICAN DIPLOMACY PROJECT A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Ambassador Nicholas Burns Ambassador Marc Grossman Ambassador Marcie Ries REPORT NOVEMBER 2020 American Diplomacy Project: A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and layout by Auge+Gray+Drake Collective Works Copyright 2020, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America FULL PROJECT NAME American Diplomacy Project A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Ambassador Nicholas Burns Ambassador Marc Grossman Ambassador Marcie Ries REPORT NOVEMBER 2020 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs | Harvard Kennedy School i ii American Diplomacy Project: A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................3 10 Actions to Reimagine American Diplomacy and Reinvent the Foreign Service ........................................................5 Action 1 Redefine the Mission and Mandate of the U.S. Foreign Service ...................................................10 Action 2 Revise the Foreign Service Act ................................. 16 Action 3 Change the Culture ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Sides and Guiding Policy United States’ and Pakistan’S Wars in Afghanistan
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORDA Choosing Sides and Guiding Policy United States’ and Pakistan’s Wars in Afghanistan Azhar Merchant 4/24/2019 Table of Contents I. Introduction… 2 II. Political Settlement of the Mujahedeen War… 7 III. The Emergence of the Taliban and the Lack of U.S. Policy… 27 IV. The George W. Bush Administration… 50 V. Conclusion… 68 1 I. Introduction Forty years of war in Afghanistan has encouraged the most extensive periods of diplomatic and military cooperation between the United States and Pakistan. The communist overthrow of a relatively peaceful Afghan government and the subsequent Soviet invasion in 1979 prompted the United States and Pakistan to cooperate in funding and training Afghan mujahedeen in their struggle against the USSR. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Afghanistan entered a period of civil war throughout the 1990s that nurtured Islamic extremism, foreign intervention, and the rise of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, ultimately culminating in the devastating attacks against Americans on September 11th. Seventeen years later, the United States continues its war in Afghanistan while its relationship with Pakistan has deteriorated to an all-time low. The mutual fear of Soviet expansionism was the unifying cause for Americans and Pakistanis to work together in the 1980s, yet as the wars in Afghanistan evolved, so did the countries’ respective aims and objectives.1 After the Soviets were successfully pushed out of the region by the mujahedeen, the United States felt it no longer had any reason to stay. The initial policy aim of destabilizing the USSR through prolonged covert conflict in Afghanistan was achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • By Any Other Name: How, When, and Why the US Government Has Made
    By Any Other Name How, When, and Why the US Government Has Made Genocide Determinations By Todd F. Buchwald Adam Keith CONTENTS List of Acronyms ................................................................................. ix Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 Section 1 - Overview of US Practice and Process in Determining Whether Genocide Has Occurred ....................................................... 3 When Have Such Decisions Been Made? .................................. 3 The Nature of the Process ........................................................... 3 Cold War and Historical Cases .................................................... 5 Bosnia, Rwanda, and the 1990s ................................................... 7 Darfur and Thereafter .................................................................... 8 Section 2 - What Does the Word “Genocide” Actually Mean? ....... 10 Public Perceptions of the Word “Genocide” ........................... 10 A Legal Definition of the Word “Genocide” ............................. 10 Complications Presented by the Definition ...............................11 How Clear Must the Evidence Be in Order to Conclude that Genocide has Occurred? ................................................... 14 Section 3 - The Power and Importance of the Word “Genocide” .. 15 Genocide’s Unique Status .......................................................... 15 A Different Perspective ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, November 2017
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION NOVEMBER 2017 IN THEIR OWN WRITE THE AID-DEVELOPMENT CONUNDRUM OWNING LEADERSHIP FOREIGN SERVICE November 2017 Volume 94, No.9 Focus on Foreign Service Authors 27 In Their Own Write We are pleased to present this year’s roundup of books by Foreign Service members and their families. 42 Of Related Interest Here are recent books of interest to the foreign affairs community that 21 were not written by members Writing and the 24 of the Foreign Service. Foreign Service On the Writing Unique experiences are the stuff of Roller Coaster Foreign Service life—and compelling There’s no more everyday 52 literature. One former FSO describes boredom, but don’t expect writing Bibliography of USAID his journey to becoming a writer. to be easier than your old job. Authors–An Update By Peter Kujawinski By Charles Ray By John Pielemeier Feature 54 When Criticism Falls on Deaf Ears: The Case of U.S. Foreign Aid Although economists and practitioners have questioned the theory behind foreign assistance to underdeveloped countries for more than four decades, the aid industry is bigger and stronger than ever today. By Thomas Dichter THE FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL | NOVEMBER 2017 5 FOREIGN SERVICE Perspectives 85 Departments Reflections An Ambassador 10 7 Returns to China Letters President’s Views By Bea Camp Serving in Hardship Posts 13 Talking Points By Barbara Stephenson 70 In Memory 9 Letter from the Editor The Writing Life By Shawn Dorman Marketplace 19 80 Speaking Out Classifieds Owning Leadership 86 82 Real Estate By Michael Pelletier Local Lens London, United Kingdom 84 Index to Advertisers By Brittany McAnally AFSA NEWS THE OFFICIAL RECORD OF THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION 59 The Foreign Service: A Home Run for America 66 AFSA Congratulates JSP Graduates 60 AFSA On the Hill—Supporting 67 A Great Way to Support AFSA U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC-2021-000027, Request for Copies of All Dissent Channel
    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop TWFN-6 A60M Washington, DC 20555-0001 Email: [email protected] November 9, 2020 Greetings, This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. This request should be considered under both statutes to maximize the release of records. REQUESTER INFORMATION Name: Kenneth Klippenstein Position: DC Correspondent/The Nation Address: (b) (6) Email: (b) (6) Phone: (b) (6) Noelle Llamas Email: (b) (6) (b) (6) RECORDS SOUGHT I respectfully request copies of all dissent channel cables, memos or any other similar type of submission received by your agency from January 1, 2009 to November 9, 2020. BACKGROUND Many federal agencies contain a messaging framework through which they are invited to express constructive criticism of government policy; this request will refer to such mechanisms as a “dissent channel.” Some agencies may not formally call it a dissent channel but the purpose is the same. For example, The Central Intelligence Agency has "red teams" of intelligence officers and analysts "dedicated to arguing against the intelligence community's conventional wisdom and spotting flaws in logic and analysis.1 In 1980, one year after the Three Mile Island nuclear meltdown, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) created its Differing Professional Opinion process, a dissent resolution mechanism.2 In 2011 the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) created a dissent reporting mechanism they called the Direct Channel, and made
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Foreign Assistance Series ELISABETH KVITASHVILI Interviewed by: John Pielemeier Initial Interview Date: December 5, 2016 Copyright 2018 ADST This oral history transcription was made possible through support provided by U.S. Agency for International Development, under terms of Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-F-16-00101. The opinions expressed herein are those of the interviewee and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training. TABLE OF CONTENTS Family background University and growing interest in international development 1979 entry into USAID as a GS officer 1983 conversion to the Foreign Service 1984 Assignment to Peshawar and the Cross-Border Humanitarian Assistance program for Afghanistan The “infamous” Primary Education Program for Afghanistan, work in Nepal and adventures in Srinagar 1986 USAID/Honduras and visits from Oliver North. Mob attack on the USAID mission USAID/Washington Asia Bureau: work in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Philippines and Thailand 1989: Setting up the new USAID program in the former Soviet Union. 1991: Work in Armenia, Chernobyl, Ukraine and airlifts with the DOD Office of Humanitarian Assistance 1992: Assignment to Moscow and opening the new mission 1 Changing the Russia program from humanitarian assistance to market and democratic reforms Providing humanitarian assistance to Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Visits by Pres. Clinton
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo | ISSF Article Review 99 Issforum.Org
    H-Diplo | ISSF Article Review 99 issforum.org H-Diplo/ISSF Editors: Seth Offenbach and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo/ISSF Web and Production Editor: George Fujii Amanda J. Rothschild. “Rousing a Response: When the United States Changes Policy toward Mass Killing.” International Security 42:2 (Fall 2017): 120-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_A_00295. Review by Debbie Sharnak, Harvard University Published by ISSF on 20 June 2018 http://tiny.cc/ISSF-AR99 https://issforum.org/articlereviews/99-rousing https://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-AR99.pdf ver the last year, the mass killing and ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya Muslim minority in Myanmar has become a major international issue. More than 700,000 Rohingya have fled from the O Rakhine state, the death roll exceeded 10,000 in a four month period from August to December 2017 alone, and policymakers and United Nations (UN) experts have been moving towards calling the situation a genocide.1 In the U.S., Congress, the State Department, and public pressure has begun to mount over whether the U.S. response—thus far a combination of congressional hearings, humanitarian assistance, and withdrawal of aid to the military—warrants a shift. 2 1 Nicholas Kristof, “Is This a Genocide?” New York Times, 15 December 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/15/opinion/sunday/genocide-myanmar-rohingya-bangladesh.html; Barb Wilkinson, “UN Official Convinced of Myanmar Rohingya ‘Genocide’,” CNN, 12 March 2018, https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/asia/myanmar-rohingya-un-violence-genocide-intl/index.html. 2 U.S. House of Representatives, Hearing, “The Rohingya Crisis: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh's Genocide Debate; a Conscientious Research
    Bangladesh’s genocide debate; A conscientious research Collective and institutional commissions of crimes diminish the self-recognition of culpability; individual responsibility loses its meaning once it is applied to a group or a community that shares a common membership and is associated through the perpetration of a crime. Often this is applied to mass atrocities such as genocide. The perpetrators believe they are invincible since they act within a social structure that dictates their actions and make them feel part of a collective criminal project, which in return weakens any sense of personal liability. “Where all are guilty, no one is; confessions of collective guilt are the best possible safeguard against the discovery of culprits, and the very magnitude of the crime the best excuse for doing nothing” - Hannah Arendt This paper will explore this notion by implementing it to the commission of war crimes, and will examine how the concept of power and particularly imposition of control and avoidance of responsibility facilitates its realization. It will outline a definition of war crimes and analyse the legal safeguards and frameworks that have been implemented in order to prevent their happening. The paper will further theoretically unravel the notion of political power and authority, and will subsequently examine how the two phenomena are interrelated – how powerful individuals and States are able to evade the law or use it to their own advantage while disregarding human rights, in order to pursue political objectives. This paper will further set out an approach of analysing this powerful juridical-political superstructure of the State apparatus through drawing an example with the war crimes and genocide committed over the East Pakistani people (present-day Bangladesh) during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.
    [Show full text]
  • A" Time When Principles Make Best Politics"? the Western Response To
    A “Time When Principles Make Best Politics”? The Western Response to “Genocide” in East Pakistan by Richard David Pilkington A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of PhD-History Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard David Pilkington 2016 A “Time When Principles Make Best Politics”? The Western Response to “Genocide” in East Pakistan Richard David Pilkington PhD-History Department of History University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This study examines the formulation of and interplay between the US, Canadian, and British policies generated in response to the mass atrocities perpetrated by Islamabad authorities in East Pakistan during 1971. It focuses on the reactions of these three closely-connected North Atlantic powers to the gross human rights abuses, analyzing the decision-making processes in Washington, Ottawa, and London during the crucial first few months of the crisis, identifying the forces at play in determining policy, and investigating the nature, development, and resolution of debates over national interests and ethical concerns. The analysis is built primarily upon documentary evidence from the US National Archives, the Nixon Presidential Materials Project, Library and Archives Canada, and the National Archives of the United Kingdom. In Washington, President Richard Nixon and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, exerted great personal influence over the determination of policy and favored a strategy of appeasement. Importantly, their secret initiative to secure rapprochement with China, which only sprang into life at the end of April, did not drive their thinking during the vital first month after the clampdown began as Kissinger has previously claimed.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Article Review 20 18
    H-Diplo Article Review 20 18 Article Review Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Web and Production Editor: George Fujii @HDiplo Article Review No. 776 20 June 2018 Amanda J. Rothschild. “Rousing a Response: When the United States Changes Policy toward Mass Killing.” International Security 42:2 (Fall 2017): 120-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_A_00295. URL: http://tiny.cc/AR776 Review by Debbie Sharnak, Harvard University ver the last year, the mass killing and ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya Muslim minority in Myanmar has become a major international issue. More than 700,000 Rohingya have fled from the O Rakhine state, the death roll exceeded 10,000 in a four month period from August to December 2017 alone, and policymakers and United Nations (UN) experts have been moving towards calling the situation a genocide.1 In the U.S., Congress, the State Department, and public pressure has begun to mount over whether the U.S. response—thus far a combination of congressional hearings, humanitarian assistance, and withdrawal of aid to the military—warrants a shift. 2 According to Amanda J. Rothschild’s new article, “Rousing a Response: When the United States Changes Policy Towards Mass Killing,” there have, historically, been certain conditions that need to be present in order for these types of major policy shifts to occur in the face of mass atrocity. Rothschild develops a “generalizable theory” for analyzing how and why the U.S. moves from a “limited response to state-sponsored mass killing” to “more robust measures” (121). Focusing on nonmilitary responses, primarily defined as diplomatic, humanitarian, and economic options, she uses an impressive array of government documents to 1 Nicholas Kristof, “Is This a Genocide?” New York Times, 15 December 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/15/opinion/sunday/genocide-myanmar-rohingya-bangladesh.html; Barb Wilkinson, “UN Official Convinced of Myanmar Rohingya ‘Genocide’,” CNN, 12 March 2018, https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/asia/myanmar-rohingya-un-violence-genocide-intl/index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR CHRISTOPHER VAN HOLLEN Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 23, 1990 Copyright 199 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Department of State Secretariat 1 51-1 54 Learning how foreign policy machinery worked NSC-State relationship Truman- Acheson Transition to Eisenhower administration McCarthyism John Foster Dulles New Delhi and Calcutta 1 54-1 58 ,nterest in ,ndia Political officer in Delhi and Calcutta Travel and reporting in ,ndia Concern a.out ,ndia/s drift to left Congress Party ,ndian officials 0isits to Dacca Consulate 1eneral relations with em.assy Pakistan 1 5 -1 21 3arachi and political reporting ,ndian and Pakistani biases in Foreign Service 4.S. interests in Pakistan SEATO Political situation in Pakistan Mohammed Ayu. 3han Strains on 4.S.-Pakistani relationship Move to Murree office to service Rawalpindi NATO Affairs 7RPM8 1 21-1 24 1uidance for political consultations in NATO 1 Relations with other bureaus in Department AN3ARA 1 25-1 28 Relations with 1reece- Cyprus NATO Dealing with Turks Turkish view of Soviets NEA 1 28-1 72 ,ndo-Pakistan conflict over East Pakistan Pu.lic opinion on side of ,ndians Nixon administration on Pakistani side Pakistani role in opening to China Attempting even-handed policy Lack of o.jectivity of 4.S. am.assadors on scene Bypassing am.assadors Role of 4.S. consulate general in Dacca Joseph Sisco and Parker Hart 3issinger and NSC Bangladesh as —international basket case“ Am.assador to Sri Lanka 1 72-1 72 How appointed 0iew of Bandaranaike government as unfriendly Few 4.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissent Channel”
    April 7, 2017 The U.S. Department of State’s “Dissent Channel” Two recently leaked Dissent Channel messages pertaining Rusk’s legacy to explore alternative foreign policy ideas. to the Obama Administration’s policy toward Syria and the Per recommendation by Task Force VII on the Stimulation Trump Administration’s first travel ban on seven Muslim- of Creativity, Secretary Rogers formally established the majority countries have helped facilitate broader political Dissent Channel to hear “well-thought-out dissent” ideas debate and scrutiny of both policies. Congress’s decisions that otherwise would not reach him or senior officials regarding the Department of State’s Dissent Channel through preexisting channels. messages, including the questions of whether Congress should receive notification of, or even access to, such Former Under Secretary for Political Affairs Nicholas messages may impact the nature of the Department’s Burns, the third-ranking DOS official serving in the George deliberations on paramount foreign policy issues and how W. Bush Administration, stressed the value his boss, its employees use the Dissent Channel. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, placed on the Dissent Channel for two reasons. One, the Channel allows DOS What Is the Dissent Channel? personnel to express dissenting views on issues central to The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has long maintained “U.S. foreign policy,” and, two, dissenting views offer an internal communications procedure known as the expert advice to the leadership that ultimately benefits the “Dissent Channel.” According to DOS’s Foreign Affairs department and the nation. Burns also emphasized the Manual (FAM), the Dissent Channel allows any U.S.
    [Show full text]