ª Ž¦ق¦ Ž¦قً . دس ª . ‎ً % . . غ ¦ . Žžفً . ق . . Ž‏قš . , . ª

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ª Ž¦ق¦ Ž¦قً . دس ª . ‎ً % . . غ ¦ . Žžفً . ق . . Ž‏قš . , . ª View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Simorgh Research Repository ÏÓÛý ªŽýž-ŽÞŽ žª ª ª , 0: ? * ð0 /#) & ž . , - , Ð() %& ' #$ ª ¦ ! ª ž ª Ï $% &' ( $ !"# ª : . $ 4 , . $ , * 3 Ž¦Þ𠎦ަ . - , , ( $ )*+ ª ª , ,>* ÏÓ 6 !7 4 8"9 : ; $( : #* . % ýð @AB . C DAE F G H . # . 7 ? $% &' O , * C O$ %6 . 6 N# . 6 N# @E K$ &# % , , L 'M ? $ , * Q A, A" $, R"S "& % 8, O$ %6 . 7 $ - P A*+ . 7 Buthidae ,Liochelidae $ Hemiscorpiidae W ¦ % Û @?C T U$ : Androctonus crassicauda . * . 6 N# ŽžÝð X % . , Scopionoidae Buthotus , Odontobuthus doriae , Orthochirus scorobiculosus , Hemiscorpius Lepturus , Mesobuthus eupeus , . $ $ , * Nebo sp Androctonus.amorcuxi ,saulcyi . !, W $] $% . \ 7 % W , &X Þ , : - , _ )" O ` T . $ $ , * $ ("%, )W #& ? % ("B . Nebo ^ T 46 % . * :+ _ 7 U"&W . >6 O $+ % $ 6 #&? % ŽþÞš *% 6 . * > ," " 4 $ >6 % L c _ , % . # C Pd e _ , ."O" $ ª ª 7 ª : - 4,-. 3 ,1 2 , 4,-. +9 :; ,785 Ì- 5 - 4,-. 3 ,1 2 ,)(* +,-. / ( Ï- - 4,-. 3 ,1 2 , =(; > ?@A( ,( B4C Ô- 5 - 4,-. 3 ,1 2 , +,-. ,2 . Ó- 5 5 - 4,-. 3 ,1 2 ª+,-. , 2 , C8 ; 785 - 5 ••• dehghani37@ yahoo.com : 8 9 (4: 6 5 2 , )(* +,-. / :6 , 234 5-4 * ÏÓÛÒ ÏÎ/ ÏÙ/ : =>: ÏÓÛÒ ÌÏ/Ù/ : 5 ;< (! ÏÓÛ ÏÌ/ Ì/ : (! ,2- ž ª W % Anuroctonus ^ $ @P Chactidae Uroctonus ^ . $ @P Chactidae W Iuridae :+ ª $ .f B 7 g EB T , $ @P Chactidae W Vaejovidae W % % ª. 7 . i " j 4 $ ª h Belisarius ^ * GkC Troglotayosicidae W !? . !, . *k Troglotayosicus ^ . * @P Chactidae W ("B Ï.( ) , ;" - , "&" ÔÎ ª T W !7 $ - P Superstitioniidae W M" % @`? L ( $ L XB d * W 6 . ^ GkC Diplocentridae % ªT . W .P` XB d .( )Ì , q" GkC Hemiscorpiidae W * @P Scorpionidae e * Peters (1861) ªB P (* ªD% ? " $ W Hemiscorpius Habibiella . ^ ª Thorell (1876) O$ $ ($s 6 - ` . $ Heteroscorpionidae W $ @P Liochelidae ª Pocock (1893) ª Simon (1879, 1880) ª Karsch (1879) @P Urodacidae W Heteroscorpion ^ GkC - ` T ( $ ª Birula (1977) ª Kraeplin (1894, 1899, 1905) Prendini & Wheeler , ÌÎÎ - , ` )Ò.( * Ó(. ) * W * ª W Ò L ( $ - . T $ . P` * 4 $ L "" x .B P Lourenco ª Lamoral (1980) L] P !"X? ( $ 6 7 $ Soleglad&Fet(2003) $ }&S Ù % ( $ . Williams (1987) (1985, 1989) - , # Fet & Soleglad ý(. ) L x "" ÏÔ $ M' (#v . $ 7X T W L3 !, ; 6 !', . - , )Ô.( * wP T T % W ;A# kB . $% 9 . P` W ""x : S, T . W .P` "W 7 $ . W X , ª ÏÙÛÙ - , Stock well A B % @P .!, $ )Þ.( )Þ.( !, Nv y P W qd, W $% s ($% . ~, D"&? $ . "7x , , % ^ Ó.( ) !, ? 3 $4 ^ ($ s N L 'M " $ $ !, ~, T ÏÚ T W X ª )# Fet(2000) 6 % T -T T $ , * & T Lourenco . , ^{, ( ) ;$+7 W 6 % T C , .* T ($ #" $ Q s % ^ )Ó.( !7 $ ;$+7 ' ÌÎ W X , , K$ 6 !"# % T T T !, ÌÎ % W ( $ X ªSoleglad&Fet(2003) B P 6 % X , $# &' )*+ L " W $% L""x ($ !7 $ ; T ÏÔ B• ( $ . $$ !? % . $ O$ y P W qd, Iuridae W Caraboctoninae # # &' . , ( "B " € P O $ . T Hadruroides, Caraboctonus . ^ W ( $ . !7 $ M. M. " D% ? . % $ |P7 Iuridae W * ? Hadrurus T .P` % C , ( $ )Ù.( $ e * Chactidae W ? Iurus Calchas ^ * T ", T !7 L 9 Olivier (1807) |, $% T ª!* ÓÒ X Broteochactas ^ ª6 % ^ . " Crassicauda 6 }"9 . ^ ,$ @P Neochatas ^ ' #4 ª Thorell (1876) ª Nordmann (1840) O$ O ^ # Taurepania Cayooca, Guyanochactas, Birula ª Pocock (1899) ª Birula (1896) ª Pococlk (1889) % , * Chactidae W Broteochactas Birula (1903) Werner (1902) ª Pocock (1900) ª (1900) W Hadrurochactas ^ Broteochactas ^ ,2. ' & ! $% # ! " 6 % . " " T . W ^ ª ÏÙÎ - , . W $ . T .kO •* " Ds ""x : W !, T † ` % $ Buthidae W &X ª $ . T $4 ($W6 v C - C .!, $ ª $% ÏÏ ÏÏ ª^ @ * ª Scorpionidae ª ª " " ), W ªÓ T .P` 3 ,>7 ªVachon (1968) %7 % @P .( ÏÓ ) ) Ù.( Ù.( ) $ " ( " A #" ) "& T "B Ï ^ Ù ª W $ . T L 9 " XB d $( . T !,>7 ª (ÏÙÚÎ )`"`C ÏÎ(. ) !, # 7X 7 v . X % " $ ÓÚ% ÌÔ ª^ ÏÏ ª W $ $ . . $ , * "+ $ kB $ . T ª %7 .( ÏÏ ) !, # :+ . $ L v ª * A*+ ! "# !, # :+ ÌÓ ^ ÏÚ ª W @ ? 6 B , ª $ € P " + " T , P"PE 8, ‚$ % ^ (ª 1997)Kovarik ÏÌ.( ) :+ j . % (" … % > . T ªO O$ L 'M % 8, $ M' . ~" !W * . !, $ Scorpionidae ª Buthidae W , $ !W * 4 ª 6 "A # ", ! #" :+ $% ÔÙ ÓÌ ª^ ÏÛ ª Diplocentridae ;P , $% . ` $ , ("‡# O$% $% . ()"B ª!, # . :+ % ."O" O Os :+ +" >6 ƒ !,>7 % ^ .( ÏÓ ) !, # :+ h ) . $ , * 3 ˆ" 7 , ( $ Bk W$% ª Prendini (ª 1997)Kovarik |, * . * 4 Ž¦Þ𠎦ަ . - , , Scorpionidae W ' #4$% T Hemiscorpiinae Hemiscorpiidae 6 y P W qd, ª Habibiella ^ . W ( $ . " . !7 4 8"9 XdP L 9 XB d ($ ÏÔ(. ) $ T ª Hemiscorpius L 9 ( haphazard ) , 7 … "\ ." # $ "7x T ª ' !E B P ‚$ ª Lourenco L 9 # . 6 N# . !7 4 " , " Hemiscorpinae W$% y P ª " ªT . W % ^ "ƒ , !*> d ª % > |, ", ( $ !, # "ƒ• ^ W qd, 7 ( $ ‡ s .$X !7 L 9 :% 6 Ô $ . T „ 7 L "" x ~ " + € "C # W $ % $ L""x % ^ )Ó(. !7 ? W $ ) "T . " # . @$ E !*> $ ( $ . W X T .P` ª " 46 A T Diplocentridae W . !7 $ ; T W Ó Ô % !* , }&S . O %$ Scorpionidae W 6 . ^ GkC .>* $ª , ( ( "# . ^ GkC Hemiscorpiidae W . * @P "\ 8C 3 % >6 B #C . O Liochelidae $ W Hemiscorpius Habibiella $ $ A W ª ‰, ‰, $% ª 8C " $ ( $ .P` .( )Ò $ @P e+ * C ªT (T ª L ? G + $ W "… S ."&T ( ÏÓÛÓ ) A# P ªÌÎÎÓ - , . # .!7 ? 4 , , ÌÙ $ . T 6 . $ … : %] L 'M ~s . Pd % B , ª X Ï(. ) ƒ ª 7 ? W ,2/ ž ª !` . "P 9 ðÐ ý/ # ŽžÝð # "9 @E T . 6 N# ª "9 K$ , ðÐ ðÐ .Ý/ L 8 ª ] 7 * "9 . O$ % 6 - P % ^ * . 6 N# . # . _ 6 9 ªÐÝ _ Œ _ + 9 * F6 ª .] @ .% , # + # " 3 9 ýþ $ _ 9 ÝÓ ª A", % ýð ˆ "&" @AB . C F G H * 9 ¦ý _ +B A" A, _ " ª , , L 'M . C ~s #* . ^ "P ^ _ {B _ "A,# C O$ %6 G H ( $ ^{, * ? Ï.( Ï.( - ) * R"S . !7 $ - P A*+ &' O , * . € " $ 7x ($" $, R"S "& % 8, O$ %6 % A ", _ 6 _ Œ $_ + $ , * . 7 ? $ , * Q A, A" * . 6 N# ; ( $ , # * : + . ^ _ € "ƒ 7x $( # : #* # A* qd, * ' ? &9 7 _ , ($" . $ . 6 N# !7 " % |P7 &, % @9 C L 'M Žš(. ) 6 @#' * . Ò • > !7 " € . e % @9 C L 'M ("‡# # $ , * , ª ª D € . e $( # 6 ! `c . 6 N# * . : #* ($" . Ì 6 `' "ª , ª W _ , XB d U$ . $ ƒ 8"9 - žš( ª ª žš( )ý/ 47 % ~" * . 6 N# # "9 Pd @E _ , ( "# ^ ", )þ/ý(ª % Žð(ª ) ‚ >* Žý(ª )ý/ T $. ƒ - • >T )Ý/ð(ª )Ý(ª !7" )¦/ý(ª )Ý/ý(ª ($#T )ž/Ž( 6`' )ž( D )Ý/¦(ª !7 )ð/Ð(ª $ . 6 N# 9 ~C ( )Þ/š ", % # - , W $ !$ xB Ž¦Þ¦ - , % % Ì.( Ì.( - ) >6 !$% . @E % # ÏÌÒ † X# ª Ž¦Þð ,>* % " " A, W &X ` ^ 9" , . ,> * }&S ( "%, #&? % ( "B . , ( $ !7 " ($" Mesobuthus eupeus X $( .% $ . 6 N# •* 6 $S . $ . * $ , * $ AW 7 . !* (' Ú ) 9 ÔÔ + " 7 G 8* % ‰ ª , ŽŽ ŽB % : !, %$ (ª ' ÓÒÏ ) 9 ÌÛ / Androctonus crassicauda hE ! c . !O (* h` Tª Orthochirus (ª ' ÌÛÒ ) 9 ÌÌ Ò/ Odontobuthus doriae "#' "* ‚$ qd, % .* . >? Hemiscorpius Lepturus (ª ' ÓÙ ) 9 Ó scorobiculosus . T † ` (> " *. D"P " )Ô 9 Ó/Î Buthotus saulcyi (ª ' ÏÏ ) 9 Ù/Î $ W ª 6 dW L 9 T T }$ Nebo ( ' )Ô 9 Ó/Î Androctonus.amorcuxi ª ( ' - . (subaculear spine) & $% O . ( ' )Ó 9 Ó/Î + " 7 ( $# sp C ‚s T ;" . !, 6 . > Ì C & W % ( 9 )Ù/Î Hemiscorpius Lepturus . . - j+ "T . , &" Ó Ì " " A, W % ( 9 )Ó/Î Nebo sp ª & " B" . * 6 . > Ò X % . " W &X ( 9 ÙÛ )Û/ P" ,20 ' & ! $% # ! " 3 456 7 Ž¦Þð 1 Ž¦Þ¦ # -% , ! $% ! *$+ # ( ) " Ž: ! " *+" $ ( $ ) $%& ) : Buthidae 1 (ÐÐ) ððý žð¦ ¦šÐ Mesobuthus eupeus (žÞ ð/ ) ¦ÝŽ Žþð ŽÝÝ Androctonus crassicauda (žž Ý/ ) žÞÝ ŽšÐ ŽÞž Odontobuthus doriae (¦) ¦þ Þ ¦Ž Orthochirus scrobiculosus (š/¦ð) Ð ž ž Androctonus.amorcuxi (š/¦ð) Ð Ž ¦ Buthotus saulcyi : Liochelidae B Hemiscorpiidae 1 (š/þ)ŽŽ ý Ð Hemiscorpious lepturus : Scorpionidae 1 ¦)¦/š( ¦)¦/š( - - Nebo sp ( ( Žšš )ŽžÝð ðý¦ Ýþž RS $%? 456 7 Ž¦Þð 1 Ž¦Þ¦ # -% , ! $% # ! >5 " <= ":; )89! : ž ! " Nebo SP *+" O.s O.d N.sp M.e H.l B.s A.c A.a ( $ )$%& - ./ (¦/Ý) ÐÝ ž ¦ - ¦š - - ŽŽ - +T. (š/Þ) Žš - - - þ - - Ž - (C . (ž) žÝ - - - Žš - - ŽÝ - . (Ý) ýÝ þ - Ž ¦Ý Ý Ð žš - +T (S (ý/¦) þž - - - Þž - - Žš - (žš ý/ ) žÝž ð ð - Žþ¦ - - ðþ - 8UT ) þ/ý( þ/ý( ) Žšš ž Ý - Ðý - - Ðð - ,: (ý/Ý) þÝ - ¦Ð - žÐ - - ¦Ý ž S (C (Žð) Žþš ž ŽŽŽ - Ðý - - ¦š - V.. - (Ž/ž).
Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the North American Vaejovid Scorpion Subfamily Syntropinae Kraepelin, 1905, Based on Morphology, Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA
    Cladistics Cladistics 31 (2015) 341–405 10.1111/cla.12091 Phylogeny of the North American vaejovid scorpion subfamily Syntropinae Kraepelin, 1905, based on morphology, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA Edmundo Gonzalez-Santill an a,b,*,†,‡ and Lorenzo Prendinib aThe Graduate Center, City University of New York, CUNY, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA; bScorpion Systematics Research Group, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY, 10024-5192, USA; †Present address: Laboratorio Nacional de Genomica para la Biodiversidad, Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Km 9.6 Libramiento Norte Carretera Leon, C.P. 36821, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico; ‡Present address: Laboratorio de Aracnologıa, Departamento de Biologıa Comparada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, C.P. 04510, Mexico D.F., Mexico Accepted 25 June 2014 Abstract The first rigorous analysis of the phylogeny of the North American vaejovid scorpion subfamily Syntropinae is presented. The analysis is based on 250 morphological characters and 4221 aligned DNA nucleotides from three mitochondrial and two nuclear gene markers, for 145 terminal taxa, representing 47 species in 11 ingroup genera, and 15 species in eight outgroup genera. The monophyly and composition of Syntropinae and its component genera, as proposed by Soleglad and Fet, are tested. The follow- ing taxa are demonstrated to be para- or polyphyletic: Smeringurinae; Syntropinae; Vaejovinae; Stahnkeini; Syntropini; Syntrop- ina; Thorelliina; Hoffmannius; Kochius; and Thorellius. The spinose (hooked or toothed) margin of the distal barb of the sclerotized hemi-mating plug is demonstrated to be a unique, unambiguous synapomorphy for Syntropinae, uniting taxa previ- ously assigned to different subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida, Solifugae) with Special Focus on Functional Analyses and Phylogenetic Interpretations
    HISTOLOGY AND ULTRASTRUCTURE OF SOLIFUGES Comparative studies of organ systems of solifuges (Arachnida, Solifugae) with special focus on functional analyses and phylogenetic interpretations HISTOLOGIE UND ULTRASTRUKTUR DER SOLIFUGEN Vergleichende Studien an Organsystemen der Solifugen (Arachnida, Solifugae) mit Schwerpunkt auf funktionellen Analysen und phylogenetischen Interpretationen I N A U G U R A L D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald vorgelegt von Anja Elisabeth Klann geboren am 28.November 1976 in Bremen Greifswald, den 04.06.2009 Dekan ........................................................................................................Prof. Dr. Klaus Fesser Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Gerd Alberti Erster Gutachter .......................................................................................... Zweiter Gutachter ........................................................................................Prof. Dr. Romano Dallai Tag der Promotion ........................................................................................15.09.2009 Content Summary ..........................................................................................1 Zusammenfassung ..........................................................................5 Acknowledgments ..........................................................................9 1. Introduction ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (SCORPIONIDA ) Herbert L. Stahnke Arizona State Universit Y Tempe, Ariz
    Stahnke, H. L. 1974 . Revision and keys to the higher categories of Vejovidae (Scorpionida) . J . Arachnol. 1 :107-141 . REVISION AND KEYS TO THE HIGHER CATEGORIE S OF VEJOVIDAE (SCORPIONIDA ) Herbert L. Stahnke Arizona State Universit y Tempe, Arizona 85281 ABSTRACT The higher categories of the Vejovidae have been revised and keys to these categories are pre- sented . As part of the revision a new subfamily, the Hadrurinae, has been recognized . In the sub - family Syntropinae a new genus, Vejovoidus, has been introduced . In the subfamily Vejovinae ne w genera recognized are Serradigitus and Pseudouroctonus. Thirteen species previously placed in th e genus Uroctonus have been shown to belong to the genus Vejovis. An extensive study of the value o f trichobothria in scorpion systematics is presented . The systematic status of Uroctonus fractus i s doubtful. It has been eliminated from the Vejovidae and apparently should be placed in the Chactida e where it will undoubtedly be synonymized . INTRODUCTIO N A revision of the Vejovidae is long overdue . With the introduction of ultraviole t detection (Stahnke, 1972) many new species are being discovered and placed into th e literature with little regard to the more precise recognition of higher categories and i n most instances without the characterization of the genera in which the new species ar e placed. This paper is a beginning toward a more precise recognition of the apparen t higher categories through a careful study of the type-species as a point of departure . The spelling "Vejovis" is used rather than the original "Vaejovis" as previously seemed correct (Stahnke, 1972).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTE DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Anne Mabille ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : Nesrine Akkari (Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienne, Autriche) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Serge Gofas (Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Espagne) Sylvain Hugel (CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, France) Marco Isaia (Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italie) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Jose Christopher E. Mendoza (Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Singapour) Annemarie Ohler (MNHN, Paris, France) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) COUVERTURE / COVER : Mitaraka Sud Massif showing dense humid forest of altitude, type locality of M. inselberg n. sp. Photo: Xavier Desmier. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Geodiversitas, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Naturae, Cryptogamie sous-sections Algologie, Bryologie, Mycologie.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Fauna of Wadi Al-Quff Protected Area, Palestine
    80 Jordan Journal of Natural History Invertebrate Fauna of Wadi Al-Quff Protected Area, Palestine Mazin Qumsiyeh Palestine Museum of Natural History and Palestine Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainability, Bethlehem University ABSTRACT We report results of a preliminary survey of the invertebrate fauna of Wadi Al-Quff area (occupied Palestine). We recorded 23 species of butterflies in 5 families. Moths were a difficult group to classify but we have at least 45 species. Dragon flies and damsel flies were noted in the Wadi Hasaka area. Four mantids in three families, two species of stick insects, one earwig species (Dermeptera) and at least seven species of Orthoptera were noted. There were at least 13 species of Hemiptera (true bugs) and 5 species of Neuroptera (netwing insects). We noted at least 13 species in ten families of the Order Diptera (the flies). We also collected/observed at least 17 species of Hymenoptera in eight families. In the Order Blattoidae (roaches), we noted two species only but the Order Coleoptera (Beetles) was very richly represented with at least 23 species in 10 families. Among parasitic arthropods we collected two species of fleas and three species of ticks (Ixodidae), one of the latter involved in transmittal of spotted fever. Five species of scorpions were noted, the largest being the Jericho or Mt. Nebo scorpion Nebo hierichonticus and the smallest being the brown scorpion Compsubuthus werneri. Two species of pseudoscorpions and two species of camel spiders were collected. A more difficult group was the regular spiders (Araneae) and we noted over two dozen species in at least 8 families.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Accounting of Medically Significant Scorpions
    Toxicon 151 (2018) 137–155 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon A global accounting of medically significant scorpions: Epidemiology, major toxins, and comparative resources in harmless counterparts T ∗ Micaiah J. Ward , Schyler A. Ellsworth1, Gunnar S. Nystrom1 Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Scorpions are an ancient and diverse venomous lineage, with over 2200 currently recognized species. Only a Scorpion small fraction of scorpion species are considered harmful to humans, but the often life-threatening symptoms Venom caused by a single sting are significant enough to recognize scorpionism as a global health problem. The con- Scorpionism tinued discovery and classification of new species has led to a steady increase in the number of both harmful and Scorpion envenomation harmless scorpion species. The purpose of this review is to update the global record of medically significant Scorpion distribution scorpion species, assigning each to a recognized sting class based on reported symptoms, and provide the major toxin classes identified in their venoms. We also aim to shed light on the harmless species that, although not a threat to human health, should still be considered medically relevant for their potential in therapeutic devel- opment. Included in our review is discussion of the many contributing factors that may cause error in epide- miological estimations and in the determination of medically significant scorpion species, and we provide suggestions for future scorpion research that will aid in overcoming these errors. 1. Introduction toxins (Possani et al., 1999; de la Vega and Possani, 2004; de la Vega et al., 2010; Quintero-Hernández et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior and Ecology of Mating in Th E Cannibalistic Scorpion, Par Uroctonus Mesaensis Stahnke (Scorpionida : Vaejovidae )
    Polis, G . A . and R . D. Farley, 1979 . Behavior and ecology of mating in the cannibalistic scorpion , Paruroctonus mesaensis Stahnke (Seorpionida : Vaejovidae) . J. Arachnol . 7 :33-46 . BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF MATING IN TH E CANNIBALISTIC SCORPION, PAR UROCTONUS MESAENSIS STAHNKE (SCORPIONIDA : VAEJOVIDAE ) Gary A. Polisr and Roger D. Farley Department of Biology University of California at Riversid e Riverside, California 9250 7 ABSTRACT During the seasonal mating period, mature males undergo alteration in behavior and ecology ; the y are more vagrant and feed less than all other components of the population . Cannibalism of mature males by mature females combined with other factors related to mating contribute to a higher death rate of adult males as compared to adult females . Reproductive behavior consists of mating rituals which minimize predatory behavior and elicit th e cooperation necessary for indirect sperm transfer . These rituals include the promenade a deux , cheliceral massage, post-mating escape and heretofore undescribed behavior which precedes the actua l mating dance . INTRODUCTION Mating behavior is often complicated by conflicting stimuli which simultaneousl y produce the incompatible tendencies to flee, attack and mate (Tinbergen 1953, Morri s 1956) . Agonistic and escape behaviors must be inhibited so partners can obtain sufficien t proximity for transfer of sperm. This is often accomplished during courtship where a stereotyped series of cues allows recognition of potential mates and produces a non- aggressive interaction with sufficient coordination and cooperation for successfu l fertilization (Bastock 1967, Morris 1970) . To understand how the behavioral requisite s for mating are achieved, courtship can be analyzed through an ethogram of its componen t behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Scorpion Phylogeography in the North American Aridlands
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 8-1-2012 Scorpion Phylogeography in the North American Aridlands Matthew Ryan Graham University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Biology Commons, Desert Ecology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Repository Citation Graham, Matthew Ryan, "Scorpion Phylogeography in the North American Aridlands" (2012). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1668. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4332649 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCORPION PHYLOGEOGRAPHY IN THE NORTH AMERICAN ARIDLANDS by Matthew Ryan Graham Bachelor of Science Marshall University 2004 Master of Science Marshall University 2007 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences School of Life Sciences College of Sciences The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas August 2012 Copyright by Matthew R. Graham, 2012 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE COLLEGE We recommend the thesis prepared under our supervision by Matthew R.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Jordanian Scorpions
    30 Jordan Journal of Natural History New records of Jordanian scorpions Zuhair Amr1, Omar A. Abed2, Thabet Al Share2, Nashat Hamidan2 & Lorenzo Prendini3 1. Department of Biology, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan. 2. The Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature, Amman, Jordan. 3. Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Fourteen scorpion species were collected during a recent field expedition to Jordan. Family Buthidae was represented by twelve species in seven gen- era (Androctonus, Birulatus, Buthacus, Compsobuthus, Hottentotta, Leiurus, and Orthochirus) and families Diplocentridae and Scorpionidae by one genus and species each (Nebo and Scorpio) respectively. Buthacus nigroaculeatus and B. yotvatensis were recorded for the first time in Jordan. Key words: Scorpions, Jordan, Buthidae, Diplocentridae, Scorpionidae, Buthacus yotvatensis. INTRODUCTION Although the scorpion fauna of Jordan has never been systematically sur- veyed, it is better known than that of many other countries in the Middle East. Thus far, 18 species and subspecies representing 10 genera in three families, Buthidae (Androctonus, Birulatus, Buthacus, Buthus, Compsobuthus, Hottentotta, Leiurus and Orthochirus), Diplocentridae (Nebo) and Scorpionidae (Scorpio) have been reported from Jordan (Vachon, 1966; Levy et al., 1973; Kinzelbach 1984; Amr et al., 1988; Amr & El-Oran, 1994; Stathi & Mylonas, 2001; Lourenço et al., 2002, 2010; Kovařík, 2003, 2012; Amr & Abu Baker, 2004; Kovařík & Whitman, 2004; Lowe et al., 2014). During September 2013, we conducted a field trip to collect scorpions from Jarash, along the desert highway to Aqaba, Ash Shawbak, Wadi Ramm and Al Mudawwarah. The present report documents the fourteen species of scorpions collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprint Covers
    TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM Speleological Monographs, Number 7 Studies on the CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA of North America Part V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher and James R. Reddell TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM SPELEOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, NUMBER 7 STUDIES ON THE CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA OF NORTH AMERICA, PART V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher Invertebrate Zoology, Natural Science Research Laboratory Museum of Texas Tech University, 3301 4th Street Lubbock, Texas 79409 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] and James R. Reddell Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin, PRC 176, 10100 Burnet Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] March 2009 TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM and the TEXAS NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78705 Copyright 2009 by the Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin All rights rereserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including electronic storage and retrival systems, except by explict, prior written permission of the publisher Printed in the United States of America Cover, The first troglobitic weevil in North America, Lymantes Illustration by Nadine Dupérré Layout and design by James C. Cokendolpher Printed by the Texas Natural Science Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas PREFACE This is the fifth volume in a series devoted to the cavernicole and endogean fauna of the Americas. Previous volumes have been limited to North and Central America. Most of the species described herein are from Texas and Mexico, but one new troglophilic spider is from Colorado (U.S.A.) and a remarkable new eyeless endogean scorpion is described from Colombia, South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotype for Nebo Hierichonticus (Simon 1872) from the Palestinian Territories (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae)
    © 2014 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 79(2): 277–280 Karyotype for Nebo hierichonticus (Simon 1872) from the Palestinian Territories (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae) Mazin B. Qumsiyeh1*, Zuhair S. Amr2, Kareem T. Abu Srour1, and Nael Al-Fawaghra1 1 Faculty of Science, Bethlehem University and Palestine Museum of Natural History, Bethlehem, Palestine 2 Department of Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan Received September 14, 2013; accepted May 22, 2014 Summary In this paper we report the first karyotypic data on Nebo hierichonticus (Simon 1872) from the occupied Palestinian territories. The karyotype consists of 50 chromosomes which appear acrocentric except for pair 3, likely representing the XY. With additional data on scorpionidae coming through, we suggest that a model of chromosomal evolution might involve changes in chromosome numbers that relate to chromosomal stability in the nucleus and recombination affecting adaptability as previously suggested and supported by studies of salmonid fish chromosomes. Key words Karyotype, Nebo hierichonticus, Palestinian territory, Scorpion. The order Scorpiones is a fascinating order of arthropods with over 2000 species. Its taxonomy continues to undergo revision, and new species are described as new data accumulate, including data on morphology and DNA analysis (e.g. Prendini et al. 2003, Sousa et al. 2011). In the Eastern Mediterranean region, some morphological work on scorpions was done by Vachon (1966, 1974), Levy and Amitai (1980), Lourenço (1999, 2002b), Amr and Al-Oran (1994), Kabakibi et al. (1999), and Stathi and Lourenço (2003). A review showed that only about 80 of over 2000 known species of scorpions have been evaluated by chromosome studies (Moustafa et al.
    [Show full text]