Arachnida, Solifugae) with Special Focus on Functional Analyses and Phylogenetic Interpretations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arachnida, Solifugae) with Special Focus on Functional Analyses and Phylogenetic Interpretations HISTOLOGY AND ULTRASTRUCTURE OF SOLIFUGES Comparative studies of organ systems of solifuges (Arachnida, Solifugae) with special focus on functional analyses and phylogenetic interpretations HISTOLOGIE UND ULTRASTRUKTUR DER SOLIFUGEN Vergleichende Studien an Organsystemen der Solifugen (Arachnida, Solifugae) mit Schwerpunkt auf funktionellen Analysen und phylogenetischen Interpretationen I N A U G U R A L D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald vorgelegt von Anja Elisabeth Klann geboren am 28.November 1976 in Bremen Greifswald, den 04.06.2009 Dekan ........................................................................................................Prof. Dr. Klaus Fesser Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Gerd Alberti Erster Gutachter .......................................................................................... Zweiter Gutachter ........................................................................................Prof. Dr. Romano Dallai Tag der Promotion ........................................................................................15.09.2009 Content Summary ..........................................................................................1 Zusammenfassung ..........................................................................5 Acknowledgments ..........................................................................9 1. Introduction ............................................................................. 12 1.1. BIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY AND LIFE CYCLE ...................................... 12 1.2. GROSSMORPHOLOGY ................................................................ 13 1.3. DISTRIBUTION, SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY ............................ 16 1.4. OBJECTIVES OF THE PRESENT WORK .......................................... 20 2. Materials and methods ............................................................21 2.1. MATERIALS .............................................................................. 21 2.1.1. Animals ............................................................................... 21 2.1.2. Collecting of animals ............................................................... 22 2.1.3. Chemicals and solutions ........................................................... 25 2.2. METHODS ............................................................................... 31 2.2.1. Keeping live animals ............................................................... 31 2.2.2. Identification ........................................................................ 31 2.2.3. Light microscopy .................................................................... 33 2.2.4. Electron microscopy ............................................................... 36 2.2.5. Stereo microscopy and digital image processing ............................... 37 2.2.6. Video recording ..................................................................... 37 2.2.7. DNA extraction, PCR and Sequencing ............................................ 38 3. Results and discussions ........................................................... 39 3.1. FLUORESCENCE ....................................................................... 39 3.1.1. Results ................................................................................ 39 3.1.2. Discussion ............................................................................ 39 3.2. SUCTORIAL ORGAN .................................................................. 41 3.2.1. Results ................................................................................ 41 External morphology of the suctorial organ ............................................... 41 Histology of the suctorial organ ............................................................ 43 Content Fine structure of the pad .................................................................. 43 3.2.2. Discussion ............................................................................ 43 3.3. TARSALIA OF LEGS I-IV .............................................................. 50 3.3.1. Results ................................................................................ 50 3.3.1.1. Ammotrechidae ................................................................... 50 3.3.1.2. Daesiidae .......................................................................... 55 3.3.1.3. Eremobatidae ..................................................................... 57 3.3.1.4. Galeodidae ......................................................................... 63 3.3.1.5. Gylippidae ........................................................................ 67 3.3.1.6. Solpugidae ........................................................................ 68 3.3.2. Discussion ............................................................................ 70 3.4. MEDIAN EYES .......................................................................... 73 3.4.1. Results ................................................................................ 73 Gross morphology of the ocular tubercle .................................................. 73 Histology of the median eyes .............................................................. 75 Fine structure of the median eyes ......................................................... 75 3.4.2. Discussion ............................................................................ 79 3.5. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) .............................................. 82 3.5.1. Results ................................................................................ 82 Prosomal ganglion .......................................................................... 82 Opisthosomal ganglion ..................................................................... 82 Peripheral nerves .......................................................................... 88 3.5.2. Discussion ............................................................................ 88 3.6. MALLEOLI ............................................................................... 90 3.6.1. Results ................................................................................ 90 3.6.2. Discussion ............................................................................ 94 3.7. ALIMENTARY SYSTEM ................................................................ 96 3.7.1. Results ................................................................................ 96 External morphology and histology of the chelicerae ..................................... 96 External morphology of the rostrum ........................................................ 96 Histology of the rostrum ................................................................... 96 Gut system ................................................................................. 99 Parasites ................................................................................... 111 3.7.2. Discussion ...........................................................................112 Content 3.8. COXAL GLANDS ....................................................................... 116 3.8.1. Results ............................................................................... 116 Anatomy of the coxal glands .............................................................. 116 Histology of the coxal glands ............................................................... 116 Fine structure of the coxal glands ........................................................ 120 3.8.2. Discussion ...........................................................................120 3.9. RESPIRATORY SYSTEM .............................................................. 124 3.9.1. Results ............................................................................... 124 Prosomal spiracles and tracheae ..........................................................124 Tracheal cells and tracheae ............................................................... 127 Opisthosomal spiracles ....................................................................127 3.9.2. Discussion ...........................................................................127 Spiracles ................................................................................... 127 Tracheae .................................................................................. 129 3.10. CIRCULATORY SYSTEM ............................................................ 132 3.10.1. Results ............................................................................. 132 Heart ...................................................................................... 132 Hemocytes ................................................................................ 132 Nephrocytes ...............................................................................138 3.10.2. Discussion ......................................................................... 139 3.11. FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM ....................................................... 142 3.11.1. Results ............................................................................. 142 Juvenile female genital system ........................................................... 143 Adult female genital system .............................................................. 148 Ultrastructure of the adult female genital system ........................................151
Recommended publications
  • Solifugae, Eremobatidae)
    1998. The Journal of Arachnology 26:113-116 RESEARCH NOTE THE EFFECTS OF REPRODUCTIVE STATUS ON SPRINT SPEED IN THE SOLIFUGE, EREMOBATES MARATHONI (SOLIFUGAE, EREMOBATIDAE) Costs associated with reproduction are de- gravid females of the solifuge Eremobates lineated by trade-offs between the current re- marathoni Muma 1970 . To my knowledge, no productive capacity of an animal and the prob- previous data on sprint speed or the relation- ability of its future survival and reproductive ship between sprint speed and reproductive success (Williams 1966) . The successful anal- status exist for the Solifugae . ysis of life history parameters depends on our Eremobates marathoni is a common inhab- ability to identify proximate mechanisms by itant of the Big Bend region of Trans Pecos which such costs are mediated . Documented Texas (Punzo 1997), which lies within the costs associated with reproduction include de- northern confines of the Chihuahuan Desert. I creased survivorship resulting from physio- collected gravid (G) and nongravid (NG) fe- logical or behavioral changes that accompany males by hand at night with the aid of a head reproduction (Hirshfield & Tinkle 1975 ; Bell lamp as they wandered over the surface of the 1980). For example, if escape from a predator ground, or through the use of pitfall traps as depends on the speed or endurance of a po- described previously (Punzo 1994a) . All so- tential prey organism, then any reduction in lifuges were collected within a 3 km radius of the locomotor performance of gravid females Marathon, Texas (Brewster County) during could increase the risk of predation . Loco- July 1996 . A detailed description of the ge- motor performance has been correlated with ology and dominant vegetation of this area is survivorship in many species of vertebrates given by Tinkam (1948) .
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9111799 Evolutionary morphology of the locomotor apparatus in Arachnida Shultz, Jeffrey Walden, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Coelotes Spiders (Araneae
    Zoological Studies 40(2): 127-133 (2001) Three New Coelotes Spiders (Araneae: Amaurobiidae) from Taiwan Xinping Wang1,*, I-Min Tso2 and Hai-Yin Wu3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, NY 10024, USA 2Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan 407, R.O.C. 3Institute of Natural Resource Management, Tunghwa University, Hwalian, Taiwan 974, R.O.C. (Accepted January 4, 2001) Xinping Wang, I-Min Tso and Hai-Yin Wu (2001) Three new Coelotes spiders (Araneae: Amaurobiidae) from Taiwan. Zoological Studies 40(2): 127-133. Five species of the spider genus Coelotes were collected from pitfall traps in the Hui-Sun Experimental Forest Station in the central mountains of Taiwan. These include Coelotes xinhuiensis Chen, 1984, Paracoelotes taiwanensis Wang and Ono, 1998; and 3 new species: Coelotes bifida sp. n., C. latus sp. n., and C. longus sp. n. The new species are described and illustrated, and the spinneret morphology and natural history of the new species C. bifida and C. latus are reported. The current number of coelotine spider species in Taiwan is increased to 12. The species, Wadotes primus Fox, 1937, which was described from Hong Kong, is newly transferred to the genus Coelotes (new combination). Key words: Coelotes bifida, Coelotes latus, Coelotes longus, Spinnerets, Hui-Sun Forest Area. Coelotes spiders are widespread and spe- wanese arachnofaunal surveys, many unrecorded cious in East Asia (Yaginuma 1986, Wang et al. species were found in these collections. Among the 1990, Wang and Ono 1998), with currently more than specimens obtained, coelotine spiders were quite 100 described species.
    [Show full text]
  • Abhandlungen Und Berichte
    ISSN 1618-8977 Mesostigmata Band 4 (1) 2004 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz ACARI Bibliographia Acarologica Herausgeber: Dr. Axel Christian im Auftrag des Staatlichen Museums für Naturkunde Görlitz Anfragen erbeten an: ACARI Dr. Axel Christian Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz „ACARI“ ist zu beziehen über: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz – Bibliothek PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz Eigenverlag Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Alle Rechte vorbehalten Titelgrafik: E. Mättig Druck: MAXROI Graphics GmbH, Görlitz Editor-in-chief: Dr Axel Christian authorised by the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Enquiries should be directed to: ACARI Dr Axel Christian Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany ‘ACARI’ may be orderd through: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz – Bibliothek PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany Published by the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz All rights reserved Cover design by: E. Mättig Printed by MAXROI Graphics GmbH, Görlitz, Germany Christian & Franke Mesostigmata Nr. 15 Mesostigmata Nr. 15 Axel Christian und Kerstin Franke Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Jährlich werden in der Bibliographie die neuesten Publikationen über mesostigmate Milben veröffentlicht, soweit sie uns bekannt sind. Das aktuelle Heft enthält 321 Titel von Wissen- schaftlern aus 42 Ländern. In den Arbeiten werden 111 neue Arten und Gattungen beschrie- ben. Sehr viele Artikel beschäftigen sich mit ökologischen Problemen (34%), mit der Taxo- nomie (21%), mit der Bienen-Milbe Varroa (14%) und der Faunistik (6%). Bitte helfen Sie bei der weiteren Vervollständigung der Literaturdatenbank durch unaufge- forderte Zusendung von Sonderdrucken bzw. Kopien. Wenn dies nicht möglich ist, bitten wir um Mitteilung der vollständigen Literaturzitate zur Aufnahme in die Datei.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of Gaeolaelaps (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae)
    Zootaxa 3861 (6): 501–530 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3861.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60747583-DF72-45C4-AE53-662C1CE2429C Two new species of Gaeolaelaps (Acari: Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) from Iran, with a revised generic concept and notes on significant morphological characters in the genus SHAHROOZ KAZEMI1, ASMA RAJAEI2 & FRÉDÉRIC BEAULIEU3 1Department of Biodiversity, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 3Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Two new species of laelapid mites of the genus Gaeolaelaps Evans & Till are described based on adult females collected from soil and litter in Kerman Province, southeastern Iran, and Mazandaran Province, northern Iran. Gaeolaelaps jondis- hapouri Nemati & Kavianpour is redescribed based on the holotype and additional specimens collected in southeastern Iran. The concept of the genus is revised to incorporate some atypical characters of recently described species. Finally, some morphological attributes with
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 596–601 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ Short PALAEOENTOMOLOGY Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Communication ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) PE https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.10 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7F92F14-A680-4D30-8CF5-2B27C5AED0AB A new spider (Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany PAUL A. SELDEN1, 2, * & torsten wappler3 1Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. 2Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 3Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Friedensplatz 1, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The Fossil-Lagerstätte of Grube Messel, Germany, has Thomisidae and Salticidae (Schawaller & Ono, 1979; produced some of the most spectacular fossils of the Wunderlich, 1986). The Pliocene lake of Willershausen, Paleogene (Schaal & Ziegler, 1992; Gruber & Micklich, produced by solution of evaporites and subsequent collapse, 2007; Selden & Nudds, 2012; Schaal et al., 2018). However, has produced some remarkably preserved arthropod fossils few arachnids have been discovered or described from this (Briggs et al., 1998), including numerous spider families: World Heritage Site. An araneid spider was reported by Dysderidae, Lycosidae, Thomisidae and Salticidae (Straus, Wunderlich (1986). Wedmann (2018) reported that 160 1967; Schawaller, 1982). All of these localities are much spider specimens were known from Messel although, sadly, younger than Messel. few are well preserved. She figured the araneid mentioned by Wunderlich (1986) and a nicely preserved hersiliid (Wedmann, 2018: figs 7.8–7.9, respectively). Wedmann Material and methods (2018) mentioned six opilionids yet to be described, and figured one (Wedmann, 2018: fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 16. Endocrine System II
    Highlights from Pesticides Lecture Prior to World War II pesticides were _______________, while post-WW II they were ______________. What is meant by the biomagnification of pesticides and what are its consequences? Differentiate between acute and chronic pesticide toxicity. Define the term LD50. Provide two major consequences of the wide-spread use of Mirex (chlorinated hydrocarbon) to control fire ants. Characterize chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides (DDT and its relatives). What is meant when it is said that the use of pesticides is contextual? Define the term naturally-occurring inorganic pesticide and provide an example. Highlights from Biological Control Lecture Define the three types of biological control and provide an example of each. Contrast predators and parasitoids. What is a density-dependent mortality factor? How has the introduction of the soybean aphids affected pest management in the Midwest? Name one untoward effect related to controlling tamarisk trees on the Colorado River. What is meant by an inoculative release of a biological control agent? How do pesticide economic thresholds affect biological control programs? Lecture 19. Endocrine system II Physiological functions of hormones • Anatomy • Hormones: 14 • Functions Functions of insect hormones: diversity Hormonal functions: Molting as a paradigm egg Eat and grow Bridge Disperse and passage reproduce embryo Postembryonic sequential polymorphism • Nature of molting, growth or metamorphosis? • When and how to molt? The molting process Ecdysis phase Pre-ecdysis phase Post-ecdysis phase Overview • About 90 years’ study (1917-2000): 7 hormones are involved in regulating molting / metamorphosis • 3 in Pre-ecdysis preparatory phase: the initiation and determination of new cuticle formation and old cuticle digestion, regulated by PTTH, MH (Ecdysteroids), and JH • 3 in Ecdysis phase: Ecdysis, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of Structural Colors
    HOME | SEARCH | PACS & MSC | JOURNALS | ABOUT | CONTACT US Physics of structural colors This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 2008 Rep. Prog. Phys. 71 076401 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/71/7/076401) The Table of Contents and more related content is available Download details: IP Address: 132.72.138.1 The article was downloaded on 02/07/2008 at 16:04 Please note that terms and conditions apply. IOP PUBLISHING REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS Rep. Prog. Phys. 71 (2008) 076401 (30pp) doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401 Physics of structural colors S Kinoshita, S Yoshioka and J Miyazaki Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Received 3 September 2007, in final form 16 January 2008 Published 6 June 2008 Online at stacks.iop.org/RoPP/71/076401 Abstract In recent years, structural colors have attracted great attention in a wide variety of research fields. This is because they are originated from complex interaction between light and sophisticated nanostructures generated in the natural world. In addition, their inherent regular structures are one of the most conspicuous examples of non-equilibrium order formation. Structural colors are deeply connected with recent rapidly growing fields of photonics and have been extensively studied to clarify their peculiar optical phenomena. Their mechanisms are, in principle, of a purely physical origin, which differs considerably from the ordinary coloration mechanisms such as in pigments, dyes and metals, where the colors are produced by virtue of the energy consumption of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Revision and Insights Into the Speciation Mode of the Spider Dysdera Erythrina Species-Complex (Araneae&Thinsp;:&A
    AUTHORS’ PAGE PROOFS: NOT FOR CIRCULATION CSIRO PUBLISHING Invertebrate Systematics http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/IS16071 Taxonomic revision and insights into the speciation mode of the spider Dysdera erythrina species-complex (Araneae : Dysderidae): sibling species with sympatric distributions Milan Rezá cA,G, Miquel A. Arnedo B, Vera Opatova B,C,D, Jana MusilováA,E, Veronika Rezá cová F and Jirí Král D ABiodiversity Lab, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, CZ-161 06 Prague 6-Ruzyne, Czechia. BDepartment of Animal Biology & Biodiversity Research Institute, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. CDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicná 7, CZ-128 44 Prague 2, Czechia. DDepartment of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. ELaboratory of Arachnid Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicná 5, CZ-128 44 Prague 2, Czechia. FLaboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-142 20 Prague, Czechia. GCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] ONLY Abstract. The genus Dysdera Latreille, 1804, a species-rich group of spiders that includes specialised predators of woodlice, contains several complexes of morphologically similar sibling species. Here we investigate species limits in the D. erythrina (Walckenaer, 1802) complex by integrating phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular data, and use this information to gain further knowledge on its origin and evolution. We describe 16 new species and redescribe four 5 poorly known species belonging to this clade. The distribution of most of the species in the complex is limited to southern France and thenorth-eastern Iberian Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Solpugid (Arachnida) Populations
    Muma, M . H . 1980 . Comparison of three methods for estimating solpugid (Arachnida) populations . J . Arachnol., 8 :267-270 . COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING SOLPUGID (ARACHNIDA) POPULATIONS' '2 Martin H. Muma3 Route 11, Box 25 0 Silver City, New Mexico 88061 ABSTRACT This 2-year study of solpugids collected at 2-week intervals from Hurley and Lordsburg, Ne w Mexico comparing 12 can traps with 40 trap boards and 40 pieces of natural ground-surface debris demonstrates that can traps are much more reliable in estimating both the mean number of individuals and the number of species in a given area than either of the other two methods tested . Additional methods studies are needed for species not consistently susceptible to can trap collections, and for attaining greater reliability for data on the relative densities of solpugid species . INTRODUCTION The present paper presents comparative population data for solpugids obtained during 1974-75 from collections in can traps, under trap boards, and under natural ground - surface debris . Estimates of solpugid populations have been published by Muma (1963, 1974b , 1975a), Allred and Muma (1971), and Brookhart (1972) . The data presented by Muma (1963), Allred and Muma (1971) and Brookhart (1972) were obtained using pit traps (large, dry cans) and were believed by Muma (1974b) to be questionable owing to th e ability of solupgids to climb smooth vertical surfaces with their adhesive palpal organs . Some of the data presented by Muma (1974a) are similarly questionable, but that obtain- ed with killing-preserving can traps, used by Muma (1975a), may be statistically valid within relatively broad limits, 30 percent of the mean, as indicated by Muma (1975b) .
    [Show full text]
  • 140063122.Pdf
    Dtet specia|isatlon and ďverslÍlcatlon oftlrc sf,der genrs Dysdara (Araneae: Dysdertdae) Summaryof PhD. thesis Tho main aim of my sfudy is to pr€s€nt now knowledge about the diet specialisation antl diversiÍicationóf ttre ipider genusDys&ra. This PhD. lhesis, ďvided in two parts' is tre summary of Íive papers. 1. Diet specialisatlon 1.1. Řezíě M., Pekór s. & I'bin Y.: Morphologlcal and behavlourď adapations for onlscophagr lnDysderassden (Araneae: Dysdertnne) [acoeptedby Journal of Zoologfl Very little is known about predators feeding on woodlioe. Spiders of the genus Dyidera (Dysderidae) were long suspeotedto be onisoophagous,but evidenoe for lheir díet speoialisation hás beenrlaoking. These spidas are chareotorised by an unusual morphological variability oftheir mouth-parts,partioularly tho ohelioaae, suggosting dietary sfrcialisation któróukazuje na potavní specializaci. Thus, we investigatedthe rebtiónsirip between mouthpertmorphology, prey pÍeferenoeand predatory belraviour of ťrvespecies represerrtingdiffoent chelioenď types. Resulb obtained sugg€st that sfudiedĎysdera spidas diffo in prey specialisetion for woďlioo. The species with unmodified chelicerae reatlity oapturedvarious artkopďs but refused woodlice while speoieswith modified ohetóerae oapfuredwoodlice' Particularly,Dysdera erythrina ind D. spinrcrus captured woodlioe as freque,lrtý as ďternativo pfey typ€s. Dysdera abdomiialis andD. dubrovnlnrii sigrificantly preforred woodlice to alternative prey. Cheliooď modifioations were found to detormine the grasping bohaviour. Species 'pinoers with elongated chelicerae used a taotio" i.e. insertd one chelicera into the soft ventil side and plaoed lhe olher on the dorsal side of woodlouse. Species with .fork dorsally ooncave chálicerae used a tactio': they fuckod thom quiokly under woodlóuse in order to bite the vental side of woodlouse body. Specios with flattonď .key chelicerae usď a tactic': lhey inserted a flattraredchelicera betweon sclerites of the armouredwoodlouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine New Species of the Eremobates Scaber Species Group of the North American Camel Spider Genus Eremobates (Solifugae, Eremobatidae)
    Zootaxa 4178 (4): 503–520 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4178.4.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20E72076-A0E4-427F-96D5-74A6DD4C9E06 Nine new species of the Eremobates scaber species group of the North American camel spider genus Eremobates (Solifugae, Eremobatidae) PAULA E. CUSHING1 & JACK O. BROOKHART2 Denver Museum of Nature and Science, 2001Colorado Blvd., Denver, CO 80205 USA. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Nine new species of the Eremobates scaber species group of the solifuge genus Eremobates Banks 1900 are described, eight of them from Mexico. These new species are: E. axacoa, E. bonito, E. cyranoi, E. fisheri, E. hidalgoana, E. jalis- coana, E. minamoritaana, E. zacatecana, and E. zapal and together increase the size of this species group to 23. A key to all species in the E. scaber species group is also provided. Key words: Camel spider, solifugid, revision, taxonomy Introduction Solifugae, commonly known as camel spiders, is a poorly studied order of arachnids. It currently includes 12 families and over 1,100 described species. The phylogeny of the order and of all but one family is currently unresolved. In recent years, our lab has focused on the phylogeny, biology, and natural history of the North American family Eremobatidae Kraepelin 1899 (Brookhart & Cushing 2002, 2004, 2005; Cushing et al. 2005, 2014, 2015; Conrad & Cushing 2011; Cushing & Casto 2012). Cushing et al. (2015) produced a backbone molecular phylogeny of the Eremobatidae that supported the monophyly of several genera and species groups within the family.
    [Show full text]