DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D: Specialist Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX D: SPECIALIST REPORTS Annexure A: Wetland Delineation and Risk Assessment © 2018 POPLAR CREEK FARM (PTY) LTD \\ \ MOOIFONTEIN 292 JT EIA Specialist Report: Aquatic Delineation and Risk Assessment DRAFT 1. 0 th 29 June 201 8 [Caption} Episodic Dranage Line, Mooifontein 292 JT [11th May 2018]. Prepared for: Prepared by: Rob Palmer Steven Henwood Nepid Consultants CC Henwood Environmental Solutions (Pty) Ltd P O Box 4349 PO Box 12340 WHITE RIVER STEILTES 1240 1213 SOUTH AFRICA Email: [email protected] Cell: +27 082 5744 486 Fax: 08668 28220 e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.nepid.co.za i © 2018 Disclaimer This report was based on the author’s best scientific and professional knowledge and information available at the time of writing. Although Nepid Consultants has tried to ensure that all information contained within this report is accurate, Nepid does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information presented in this report. TERMS OF REFERENCE Conduct wetland delineation and functionality report for clearing and cultivation on the farm Mooifontein 292 JT [Email request from Steven Henwood, 2018-05-07]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following are gratefully acknowledged for assisting with the information presented in this report: • Dawie Janse van Rensburg, Poplar Creek • Felicity Weir, White River ii © 2018 Requirements for Specialist Reports Reference Appendix 6 of Amendments to the environmental impact assessment regulations, 2014 (Government Notice No 326, 7th April 2017), promulgated in terms of National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998). a(i) the specialist who prepared the report Appendix A a(ii) the expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a Appendix A curriculum vitae (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be Appendix B specified by the competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was Chapter 1 prepared; (cA) an indication of the quality and age of the base data used for the Section 3.3 specialist report (cB) a description of existing impacts on site, cumulative impacts of the Section 5.3 proposed development and levels of acceptable change Section 6.3 (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the relevance Section 3.3 of the season to the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or Chapter 3 carrying out the specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site Chapter 5 related to the proposed activity or activities and its associated structures (alternatives were and infrastructure, inclusive of a site plan identifying site alternatives; not considered) (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; Figure 5-2 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated structures Figure 5-2 and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in Section 3.10 knowledge; (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on Chapter 6 the impact of the proposed activity, including identified alternatives on the environment, [ including identified alternatives on the environment], or activities (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Appendix F (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation n/a (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental Section 8.3 authorisation; (n) a reasoned opinion- Section 8.1 (i) as to whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; (iA) regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity, activities, and (ii) if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure plan; (o) a description of any consultation process that was undertaken during None the course of preparing the specialist report; (p) a summary and copies of any comments received during any n/a consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto; and (q) any other information requested by the competent authority; n/a (2) Where a government notice by the Minister provides for any protocol or n/a minimum information requirement to be applied to a specialist report, the requirements as indicated in such notice will apply. iii © 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................................ II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................. II TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS REPORT ............................................................................... 5 1.3 EXPERTISE OF THE SPECIALIST ............................................................................................. 5 1.4 LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................................ 6 2. STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................. 8 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 APPROACH ........................................................................................................................ 10 3.2 REVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.3 FIELD SURVEY ................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................... 10 3.5 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM DELINEATION .................................................................................... 10 3.6 ECOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT ...................................................................... 10 3.7 PRESENT ECOLOGICAL STATE ............................................................................................ 11 3.8 RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................. 11 3.9 BUFFER ZONES .................................................................................................................. 11 3.10 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................... 12 4. REGIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................... 13 4.1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ......................................................................................................... 13 4.2 TOPOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 14 4.3 DRAINAGE.......................................................................................................................... 15 4.4 TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION ................................................................................................. 15 4.5 AQUATIC ECOREGION ......................................................................................................... 16 4.6 STRATEGIC WATER SOURCE AREAS ................................................................................... 16 4.7 PROVINCIAL FREWATER ASSESSMENT................................................................................. 16 4.8 LAND USE .......................................................................................................................... 17 5. BASELINE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 18 5.1 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM CLASSIFICATION AND DELINEATION .................................................... 18 5.2 ECOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL IMPORTANCE ......................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Magnoliophyta, Arly National Park, Tapoa, Burkina Faso Pecies S 1 2, 3, 4* 1 3, 4 1

    Magnoliophyta, Arly National Park, Tapoa, Burkina Faso Pecies S 1 2, 3, 4* 1 3, 4 1

    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2011 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution Magnoliophyta, Arly National Park, Tapoa, Burkina Faso PECIES S 1 2, 3, 4* 1 3, 4 1 OF Oumarou Ouédraogo , Marco Schmidt , Adjima Thiombiano , Sita Guinko and Georg Zizka 2, 3, 4 ISTS L , Karen Hahn 1 Université de Ouagadougou, Laboratoire de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales, UFR/SVT. 03 09 B.P. 848 Ouagadougou 09, Burkina Faso. 2 Senckenberg Research Institute, Department of Botany and molecular Evolution. Senckenberganlage 25, 60325. Frankfurt am Main, Germany 3 J.W. Goethe-University, Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity. Siesmayerstr. 70, 60054. Frankfurt am Main, Germany * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Biodiversity and Climate Research Institute (BiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325. Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Abstract: The Arly National Park of southeastern Burkina Faso is in the center of the WAP complex, the largest continuous unexplored until recently. The plant species composition is typical for sudanian savanna areas with a high share of grasses andsystem legumes of protected and similar areas toin otherWest Africa.protected Although areas wellof the known complex, for its the large neighbouring mammal populations, Pama reserve its andflora W has National largely Park.been Sahel reserve. The 490 species belong to 280 genera and 83 families. The most important life forms are phanerophytes and therophytes.It has more species in common with the classified forest of Kou in SW Burkina Faso than with the geographically closer Introduction vegetation than the surrounding areas, where agriculture For Burkina Faso, only very few comprehensive has encroached on savannas and forests and tall perennial e.g., grasses almost disappeared, so that its borders are even Guinko and Thiombiano 2005; Ouoba et al.
  • Nupe Plants and Trees Their Names And

    Nupe Plants and Trees Their Names And

    NUPE PLANTS AND TREES THEIR NAMES AND USES [DRAFT -PREPARED FOR COMMENT ONLY] Roger Blench Mallam Dendo 8, Guest Road Cambridge CB1 2AL United Kingdom Voice/ Fax. 0044-(0)1223-560687 Mobile worldwide (00-44)-(0)7967-696804 E-mail [email protected] http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm This printout: January 10, 2008 Roger Blench Nupe plant names – Nupe-Latin Circulation version TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................ 1 TABLES........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. THE NUPE PEOPLE AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................... 2 2.1 Nupe society ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 The environment of Nupeland ............................................................................................................. 3 3. THE NUPE LANGUAGE .......................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................
  • The Importance of Scrophulariaceae Family As a Source of Herbal and Conventional Medicines

    The Importance of Scrophulariaceae Family As a Source of Herbal and Conventional Medicines

    THE IMPORTANCE OF SCROPHULARIACEAE FAMILY AS A SOURCE OF HERBAL AND CONVENTIONAL MEDICINES. A DISSERTATION BY: KETTER FAITH CHEROTICH U29/10964/2006 SCHOOL OF PHARMACY SUPERVISED BY: DRA.GATUMA DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY AND PHARMACOGNOSY SCHOOL OF PHARMACY A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF PHARMACY DEGREE OF UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI AUGUST 2011 DECLARATION This research project is my original idea and has been submitted for evaluation, research and examination with my approval and to the best of my knowledge has not been presented elsewhere for project work. ~~ IG;, I~oll Sign . Date lo~ . Name: KETTER FAITH CHEROTICH This project has been submitted with my approval as the University Supervisor c:;;er-?' ~/'l ' Sign ~ . Date ~.~. (P. '7I.'~R..~.!. Name: DR A.GATUMA Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacognosy School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi. DEDICATION To my parents for moulding me to the person I am today. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Special thanks to my project supervisor Dr.Gatuma for his constant guidance and correction that proved useful to my work. To the attendants at the National Museums of Kenya library especially Monicah, who proved very instrumental in my research which enabled me to complete this work. iii ABBREVIATIONS WHO- World Health Organization CNS- Central Nervous System GMPs- Good Manufacturing Practices iv ABSTRACT This project was based on extensive exploration of Scrophulariaceae family as an important source of traditional and conventional medicines using literature survey, internet andjoumals. A brief survey of the various sub-families was done, and then the various species of medicinal importancewere considered.
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Flora of Guinea-Bissau (West Africa)

    An Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Flora of Guinea-Bissau (West Africa)

    BLUMEA 53: 1– 222 Published on 29 May 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651908X608179 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF GUINEA-BISSAU (WEST AFRICA) L. CATARINO, E.S. MARTINS, M.F. PINTO BASTO & M.A. DINIZ IICT – Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, Trav. Conde da Ribeira 9, 1300-142 Lisboa, Portugal; e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Summary . 1 Résumé . 1 Resumo . 2 Introduction – The country’s main features . 2 Vegetation . 5 Botanic collections in Guinea-Bissau . 9 Material and Methods . 13 Checklist of the vascular flora of Guinea-Bissau . 19 Pteridophyta . 19 Magnoliophyta (Angiospermae) . 21 Magnoliopsida (Dicotyledones) . 21 Liliopsida (Monocotyledones) . 119 References . 151 Taxonomic Index . 191 SUMMARY A Checklist of Guinea-Bissau’s vascular flora is presented, based on the inventory of herbarium material and on recent collections. In addition to the name, we cite for each taxon the basionym and synonyms, the life form and habitat, as well as the chorology, Raunkiaer’s biological type, phenology and vernacular names if known. 1507 specific and infra-specific taxa were recorded, of which 1459 are autochthonous, belonging to 696 genera. This shows a higher diversity than the 1000 species estimated so far. In the autoch- thonous flora there are 22 species of Pteridophyta from 14 families; 1041 taxa of Dicotyledons from 107 families, and 396 taxa of Monocotyledons belonging to 33 families. Three taxa are probably endemic to the country. Key words: flora, phytogeography, ecology, chorology, vernacular names, Guinea-Bissau. RÉSUMÉ Ayant pour base l’inventaire des matériaux d’herbier et les récoltes récentes, une Checklist est présenté sur la flore vasculaire de la Guinée-Bissau.
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0027697 A1 Deo (43) Pub

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0027697 A1 Deo (43) Pub

    US 20120027697A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0027697 A1 Deo (43) Pub. Date: Feb. 2, 2012 (54) PLANT EXTRACTS, COMPOSITIONS CSK 5/00 (2006.01) CONTAINING SAME, AND USES THEREOF C09K 8/584 (2006.01) CIOM 69/04 (2006.01) (76) Inventor: Namita Deo, Newark, NJ (US) CIOL I/O (2006.01) A2.3L. I./22 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 13/017,179 A6IR 36/68 (2006.01) (22) Filed: Jan. 31, 2011 (52) U.S. Cl. ............. 424/58; 424/725; 424/769: 424/59; 424/70.6:510/108; 5.10/344; 510/365; 510/109: Related U.S. Application Data 510/218: 252/380: 252/182.12: 516/10; 106/400; (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/729,718, 507/203; 508/110; 44/307:426/615 filed on Mar. 23, 2010. (57) ABSTRACT Publication Classification This disclosure relates to plant extracts selected from Bacopa (51) Int. Cl. plant extracts, Centella plant extracts, Jatropha plant extracts, A 6LX 8/97 (2006.01) Aegle plant extracts, Terminalia plant extracts, Phyllanthus A6 IK 36/23 (2006.01) plant extracts, Spilanthes plant extracts, and mixtures thereof. A6 IK 36/47 (2006.01) compositions containing plant extracts selected from Bacopa A6 IK 36/75 (2006.01) plant extracts, Centella plant extracts, Jatropha plant extracts, A6 IK 36/185 (2006.01) Aegle plant extracts, Terminalia plant extracts, Phyllanthus A6 IK 36/28 (2006.01) plant extracts, Spilanthes plant extracts, and mixtures thereof. A61O 1704 (2006.01) and to the use of these compositions in a variety of applica A61O 19/04 (2006.01) tions including, for example, cosmetic and/or pharmaceutical A61O 19/08 (2006.01) preparations, therapeutic preparations, and personal care A6IP 7/00 (2006.01) preparations.
  • The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Central Africa

    The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Central Africa

    THE S THE STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION T A OF FRESHWATER BIODIVERSITY T U S IN CENTRAL AFRICA AND Brooks, E.G.E., Allen, D.J. and Darwall, W.R.T. D I st RIBU T ION OF F RE S HWA T ER B IODIVER S I T Y IN CEN CENTRAL AFRICA CENTRAL T RAL AFRICA INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE WORLD HEADQUARTERS Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 999 0000 Fax: + 41 22 999 0020 www.iucn.org/species www.iucnredlist.org The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development Africa challenges. The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Eastern Africa. Compiled by William R.T. Darwall, Kevin IUCN works on biodiversity, climate change, energy, human livelihoods and greening the world economy by supporting scientific research, managing G. Smith, Thomas Lowe and Jean-Christophe Vié, 2005. field projects all over the world, and bringing governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Southern Africa. Compiled by William R.T. Darwall, IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, Kevin G. Smith, Denis Tweddle and Paul Skelton, 2009. with more than 1,000 government and NGO members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Western Africa.
  • Serikali Ya Mapinduzi Zanzibar Care Tanzania And

    Serikali Ya Mapinduzi Zanzibar Care Tanzania And

    SERIKALI YA MAPINDUZI ZANZIBAR CARE TANZANIA AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL CROPS, FRUITS AND FORESTRY NGEZI – VUMAWIMBI FOREST RESERVES BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY REPORT PREPARED BY C. L. NAHONYO, L. B. MWASUMBI, C. A. MSUYA, C.A. MASAO, T. B. SUYA AND C. SHING’WENDA DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY AND MARINE BIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM P. O. BOX 35064 DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA [email protected] JULY 2005 Table of Contents Item Page Title………………………………………………………….……………………... i Table of Contents………………………………………………………………….. ii List of Tables………………………………………………………………………. iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………… v List of Maps………………………………………………………………………... v List of Appendices…………………………………………………………………. vi Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………… vii Map showing position of Pemba relative to Tanzania mainland……………….….. viii Map of Zanzibar showing position of Ngezi –Vumawimbi Forest Reserves.……... ix Executive Summary………………………………………………………………... x 1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………... 1 1.1 Overview of Tanzania biodiversity………………………………………… 2 1.2 Brief history of Ngezi –Vumawimbi study area…………………………… 3 1.2.1 History of Ngezi forest………………………………………………… 3 2.0 THE SURVEY AREA…………………………………………………………. 5 2.1 Location……………………………………………………………………. 5 2.2 Scope……………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.3 Accessibility………………………………………………………………... 5 2.4 Topography………………………………………………………………… 5 2.5 Geology and hydrology...………………………………………………….. 6 2.6 Soils………………………………………………………………………... 6 2.7 Climate……………………………………………………………………... 6 2.8 Vegetation………………………………………………………………….

  • An Annotated Checklist of the Coastal Forests of Kenya, East Africa

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 147: 1–191 (2020) Checklist of coastal forests of Kenya 1 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.147.49602 CHECKLIST http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated checklist of the coastal forests of Kenya, East Africa Veronicah Mutele Ngumbau1,2,3,4, Quentin Luke4, Mwadime Nyange4, Vincent Okelo Wanga1,2,3, Benjamin Muema Watuma1,2,3, Yuvenalis Morara Mbuni1,2,3,4, Jacinta Ndunge Munyao1,2,3, Millicent Akinyi Oulo1,2,3, Elijah Mbandi Mkala1,2,3, Solomon Kipkoech1,2,3, Malombe Itambo4, Guang-Wan Hu1,2, Qing-Feng Wang1,2 1 CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Gar- den, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China 2 Sino-Africa Joint Research Center (SA- JOREC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4 East African Herbarium, National Museums of Kenya, P. O. Box 45166 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Corresponding author: Guang-Wan Hu ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Herendeen | Received 23 December 2019 | Accepted 17 March 2020 | Published 12 May 2020 Citation: Ngumbau VM, Luke Q, Nyange M, Wanga VO, Watuma BM, Mbuni YuM, Munyao JN, Oulo MA, Mkala EM, Kipkoech S, Itambo M, Hu G-W, Wang Q-F (2020) An annotated checklist of the coastal forests of Kenya, East Africa. PhytoKeys 147: 1–191. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.147.49602 Abstract The inadequacy of information impedes society’s competence to find out the cause or degree of a prob- lem or even to avoid further losses in an ecosystem.
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants of the W National Park in Burkina Faso, Including the Adjacent Hunting Zones of Tapoa-Djerma and Kondio

    A Checklist of Vascular Plants of the W National Park in Burkina Faso, Including the Adjacent Hunting Zones of Tapoa-Djerma and Kondio

    Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e54205 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e54205 Taxonomic Paper A checklist of vascular plants of the W National Park in Burkina Faso, including the adjacent hunting zones of Tapoa-Djerma and Kondio Blandine M.I. Nacoulma‡, Marco Schmidt §,|, Karen Hahn¶, Adjima Thiombiano‡ ‡ Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso § Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany | Palmengarten, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ¶ Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Corresponding author: Marco Schmidt ([email protected]) Academic editor: Anatoliy Khapugin Received: 12 May 2020 | Accepted: 18 Jun 2020 | Published: 03 Jul 2020 Citation: Nacoulma BM.I, Schmidt M, Hahn K, Thiombiano A (2020) A checklist of vascular plants of the W National Park in Burkina Faso, including the adjacent hunting zones of Tapoa-Djerma and Kondio. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e54205. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54205 Abstract Background The W National Park and its two hunting zones represent a unique ecosystem in Burkina Faso for biodiversity conservation. This study aims at providing a detailed view of the current state of the floristic diversity as a baseline for future projects aiming at protecting and managing its resources. We combined intensive inventories and distribution records from vegetation plots, photo records and herbarium collections. New information This is the first comprehensive checklist of vascular plants of the Burkina Faso part of the transborder W National Park. With 721 documented species including 19 species new to Burkina Faso, the Burkina Faso part of the W National Park is, so far, the nature reserve with most plant species in Burkina Faso.

  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0236324 A1 Deo (43) Pub

    US 2011 0236324A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0236324 A1 Deo (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 29, 2011 (54) PLANT EXTRACTS, COMPOSITIONS plant extracts, Centella plant extracts, and mixtures thereof. CONTAINING SAME, AND USES THEREOF and to the use of these compositions in a variety of applica tions including, for example, cosmetic and/or pharmaceutical (76) Inventor: Namita Deo, Newark, NJ (US) preparations, therapeutic preparations, and personal care preparations. A preferred Bacopa plant extract is obtained (21) Appl. No.: 12/729,718 from Bacopa monniera, and a preferred Centella plant extract (22) Filed: Mar. 23, 2010 is obtained from Centella asiatica. The plant extracts include Sunless tanning active extracts, Sunscreen active extracts, Publication Classification ultraviolet radiation protective extracts, anti-aging active extracts, anti-wrinkle active extracts, moisturizing active (51) Int. Cl. extracts, skin soothing active extracts, skin/hair softening A 6LX 8/97 (2006.01) active extracts, skin/hair treatment active extracts, anti-in A61O 5/00 (2006.01) flammatory active extracts, cosmeceutical preservative A61O 1704 (2006.01) extracts, cosmeceutical stabilizer extracts, antioxidant active A61O 19/00 (2006.01) extracts, free radical inhibitive extracts, cleansing active A61O II/00 (2006.01) extracts, anti-microbial active extracts, anti-fungal active (52) U.S. Cl. ................ 424/58; 424/725; 424/74; 424/59 extracts, hair coloring active extracts, and oral cleaning/de odoring active extracts. The cosmeceutical compositions (57) ABSTRACT include at least one of a Bacopa plant extract, a Centella plant This disclosure relates to plant extracts selected from Bacopa extract, or a mixture thereof.
  • Botanical Research Institute of Texas

    Botanical Research Institute of Texas

    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE SYSTEMATICS OF THE MECARDONIA ACUMINATA (TRIBE GRATIOLEAE, PLANTAGINACEAE) COMPLEX OF SOUTHEASTERN USA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By ADJOA RICHARDSON AHEDOR Norman, Oklahoma 2007 i UMI Number: 3261117 Copyright 2007 by Ahedor, Adjoa Richardson All rights reserved. UMI Microform 3261117 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 SYSTEMATICS OF THE MECADONIA ACUMINATA (TRIBE GRATIOLEAE, PLANTAGINACEAE) COMPLEX OF SOUTHEASTERN USA A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY AND MICROBIOLOGY BY _________________________________ Dr. Wayne J. Elisens, chair _________________________________ Dr. Richard Broughton _________________________________ Dr. Linda L. Wallace ________________________________ Dr. Scott Russell _________________________________ Dr. Jia Li ii © Copyright by ADJOA RICHARDSON AHEDOR 2007 All Rights Reserved. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was partly funded through grants provided to the primary author by the University of Oklahoma Graduate Student Senate and the Department of Botany and Microbiology. I would like to recognize members of my graduate committee for their critical review of this project, especially Dr. Wayne Elisens for his directions and encouragement, Dr. Scott Russell for the use of microscopes and imaging equipments in the Samuel Robert Noble Electron Microscopy Laboratory, and Dr. Jia Li for the use of his laboratory equipment. I would like to thank Mr. Bill Chissoe and Mr. Greg Strout for their directions and assistance in the use of the SEM and image software.
  • Distribution, Use and Ecological Roles of the Medicinal Plants Confined to Freshwater Ecosystems in South Africa

    Distribution, Use and Ecological Roles of the Medicinal Plants Confined to Freshwater Ecosystems in South Africa

    DISTRIBUTION, USE AND ECOLOGICAL ROLES OF THE MEDICINAL PLANTS CONFINED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS IN SOUTH AFRICA DISTRIBUTION, USE AND ECOLOGICAL ROLES OF THE MEDICINAL PLANTS CONFINED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS IN SOUTH AFRICA Report to the Water Research Commission by J Wentzel and CE van Ginkel WRC Report No. KV 300/12 August 2012 Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 Gezina, 0031 SOUTH AFRICA This report emanates from a project titled Distribution, use and ecological roles of the medicinal plants confined to freshwater ecosystems in South Africa (WRC Project No. K8/971) DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use ISBN 978-1-4312- 0312-3 Printed in the Republic of South Africa © WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION Executive summary The aim of this study was to assess the current knowledge on the distribution, ecological role and use of indigenous plants utilised for medicinal purposes that occur in freshwater ecosystems. It is in support of the Department of Science and Technology (DST) 10-year Innovation Strategy and the ‘Farmer to Pharma’ Grand Challenge, which focuses on unlocking the value of our biodiversity, indigenous knowledge and traditional medicine. For the purposes of this study, the definition of freshwater ecosystems were obtained from a study initiated by SANBI (2009).This study used the Hydrogeomorphic Model as basis and was the author’s opinion that this model would give a good indication of plant habitat.