DOCSLIB.ORG

A History of the Papacy from the Great Schism to the Sack of Rome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

presented to librae? of the of Toronto N Bertram 1H. 2>at>ts rrcm tbc boohe of the late Xionel Davia, ik.C. THE PAPACY VOL. 11. WORKS BY MANDELL CREIGHTON, D.D., SOMETIME BISHOP OF LONDON. A HISTORY OF THE PAI >M TIIK GREAT TO THE SACK OF R 1527. 6 vois. Crown 8vo, 5*. net each. HISTORICAL KSSAYS AND REVIEWS. Edited by LOUISE CREIGHTON. Crown 8vo, 51. net. HI^l >RICAL LECTURES AND ADI) Edited by LOUISE CRICK, -own 8vo, 5 V QUEK KTH. With Portrait Crown 8vo, $s. net. CARLISLE. Crown 8vo, y. (>d, (Historic Towns.) \ DE MONTFUK I. Fcp. 8vo, a*. 6rf. (Historical KTH. W,t,, 5 Maps and 4 < logical Table*. Fcp. dvo, as. bd. (Epochs of Modem Hutory.) . i i .-s IH-R'.'H \\:. : and ( rown 8vo, 5*. net. i-'.'JUTION AND before Uie of in Lectures preacher! University Cambridge 1893-4. Crown 8vo. a*. 6d. Speeches and Sermons. vn 8vo. 51. net. Popular Edition, 6,. MIND OF M>ns. Crown 8vo. 31. 6 ; UNIVERSITY AND OIHKK M ra 8vo, oat COUN ' N(i. Crown 8vo, 2.. orf. net 1<N I.IM praached < ; 74- ivo, 3*. 6^L oat. N O M A N VDKAS. A HISTORY OF THE PAPACY FROM THE GREAT SCHISM TO THE SACK OF ROME BY M. CREIGHTON, D.D., OXON. AND CAM. LATE LORD BISHOP OF LONDON DIXIE PROFESSOR OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE HON. FELLOW OF MERTON COLLEGE, OXFORD, AND EMMANUEL COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE LL.D. OF GLASGOW AND HARVARD; D.C.L. OF DURHAM; LITT. D. OF DUBLIN FELLOW OF THE SOCIETA ROMANA DI STORIA PATRIA NEW EDITION IN SIX VOLUMES VOL. II. NE W IMPRESSION LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON FOURTH AVENUE & 30TH STREET, NEW YORK BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS 1914 All rights reserved t*y& CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME BOOK II. continued. THE COUNCIL OF CONSTANCE. 1414 1418. CHAPTER IV. fOHN HUS IN BOHEMIA. 13981414. 4.O AGK 1369-1402. Early life of Hus 3 Position of Hus 4 of of . 1403. Condemnation Wyclif by University Prag 4 Hus and Archbishop Zbynek .... 5 1406-8. Zbynek proceeds against Wyclifite teachers . 5 1408-9. Influence of the Council of Pisa on Wenzel's position 6 1409. The Germans quit the University of Prag . 7 Influence of this on Germany .... 8 Bull of Alexander V. against Bohemian heretics . 9 Hus protests against the Bull .... 10 Zbynek burns Wyclifs writings . 12 Hus excommunicated by Cardinal Colonna . 13 Temporary truce 13 Hus protests against the sale of indulgences . 15 Tumult in Prag 16 Excommunication of Hus 17 I4I2-3. Hus in exile 18 Wenzel attempts to make peace .... 18 Literary activity of Hus 19 Theological opinions of Hus .... 19 1414. Hus agrees to go to the Council of Constance 22 Journey of Hus to Constance .... 23 CONTENTS OP THE SECOND VOLUME. CHAPTER V. THE COUNCIL Of CONSTANCE AND THE BOHEMIAN REFORMERS 14141416. 4.0 *< 1414. Hus and the opening of the Council 25 Enemies of Hus at Constance 25 26 Opinions at the Council about Hus Nov. a8. Hus imprisoned 28 Hus before the Pope and Cardinals 28 1415. Anger of Sigismund at the violation of his safe-conduct . 30 Arguments in favour of disregarding the safe-conduct . 31 May 4. Condemnation of Wyclifs writings 33 May 16-31. Protest of Hus's friends 34 The Communion under both kinds in Bohemia . -35 May 83. Capture of Jerome of Prag . .... 36 Different positions of Hus and the Council .... 37 June 5. First audience of Hus 38 June 7. Second audience of Hus 39 Attitude of Sigismund 41 June 8. Third audience of Hus 42 Incautious confidences of Sigismund 44 Attempt to induce Hus to retract 45 June 15. Decree against the Communion under both kinds . 46 Hus bids farewell to bis friends 47 July 6. Formal condemnation of Hus 48 Hus degraded from the priesthood 49 Death of Hus 49 Fairness of Hus's trial 50 J U J73~\ Effects of the death of Hus in Bohemia .... 51 . 10. Recantation of Jerome of Prag 53 Feb.. 1416. Proceedings against Jerome 53 Poggio's account of the trial 54 Mayas. Trial of Jerome 55 Mays* Jerome's second audience 56 Jerome withdraws his recantation .... 57 May 30. Death of Jerome 57 CHAPTER VI. SIOtSMUND'S JOUINEY, AND THE COUNCIL DURING HIS ABSENCE. 14151416. July4 .T 4 i5 Abdication of Gregory XI I. 59 8. Departort of Sigismund from Constance .... 59 BbDHstDBQ ftt Pcrpifidn . * . * 60 Reristaoce of Benedict Xlli 61 Dec. 13. Articles of Narbonne 62 Joy at Constance 6a CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME. A.D. 1416. Plans of Sigismund ........ 63 Mar. -Apr. Sigismund in Paris . 64 August. Failure of Sigismund's peace projects ..... 65 Aug. 15. Treaty of Canterbury 65 to Constance .'an., 1417. Return of Sigismund ..... 66 July, 1415. Appointment of first Reform Commission .... 67 Complaint of the French nation against Annates . 68 November. Failure of their movement against Annates .... 69 1415-6. Lethargy of the Council about Reform . 70 Opinions of Jean Petit ........ 7i 1413. Condemnation of Petit by the Bishop of Paris 71 1415. Moderating attitude of the Council towards the question 72 Quarrel of Gerson and the Burgundian party /?3 1416. Action of the Cardinals 74 Opinions in the Council about Petit's propositions . 74 Oct. 15. Incorporation of Aragon 76 Nov. -Dec. Discord of the French and English 76 CHAPTER VII. THE COUNCIL OF CONSTANCE AND THE ELECTION OF MAKTIN V. 1417. 1417. Position of the Council 78 March 3. Protest of the French against the English Nation 79 March 30. Answer of the English * 80 January. Citation of Benedict XIII. 82 March 30. Demand of Castile for a new election . 82 Question of the Council's procedure 83 Parties in the Council .... 84 Change of attitude of the French Nation 86 April-June. Disturbance about the order of business 88 July ii. Compromise ..... 89 July 26. Deposition of Benedict XIII. 90 Oct. 8, 1416. Report of the First Reform Commission 90 1417. Appointment of a Second Reform Commission 91 Sept. 9. The Cardinals press for a Papal election 9i Sept. 9-11. Renewed disturbances at Constance . 92 Sept. ii. Protest of the Cardinals .... 93 Diminution of Sigismund's party . 94 Sept. 14. Resistance of the Germans .... 94 Sigismund deserted by the English 94 Oct. 2. Sigismund driven to consent to a new election 96 Oct. 9. Reform decrees . 96 Compromise made by the Bishop of Winchester 97 Oct. 30. Decrees for furtherance of Reform . 98 Nov. 8. Beginning of the Conclave . 99 Nov. 9-10. Proceedings of the Conclave . 100 Nov. ii. Election of Oddo Colonna .... ICO CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME. CHAPTER VIII. MARTIN V. AND THE REFORMATION AT CONSTANCE. END OP THE COUNCIL. 14171418. A D PAOB 1417 Martin V. confirms the Chancery rules . .103 Rules of the Papal Chancery 103 Nov. ai. Coronation of Martin V io.j Difficulties in the way of Reform 105 Jan., 1418. Martin V.'s Reform programme 106 February. Embassy of the Greeks 107 Questions of Petit and Falkenberg 109 March ai. Reform Statutes no The Concordats of Constance 1 1 1 Contents of the Concordats .112 The Brethren of Common Life 1 1 1 1 Position of Matthias Grabow . April Grabow condemned by D'Ailly and Gcrson . .115 April 22. Dissolution of the Council . * II May 16. Martin V. leaves Constance no Difficulties of Sigismund's departure 117 Fortunes of D'Ailly and Gerson 118 Results of the Reformation of Constance .... Reforms mooted at Constance 120 Renewal of Synods 120 Reorganisation of the College of Cardinals . .121 Papal taxation 121 Papal law courts . 123 Papal grants 123 Papal dispensations 124 Papal revenues iss Causes of the failure of the Reform at Constance . Defective organisation of the Council 126 BOOK III. THE COUNCIL OF BASEL. 14191444. CHAPTER I. MARTIN V. AND ITALIAN AFFAIRS. 14191425. 1418 Martin V. journeys to Italy . 1.3' Feb.. 1419 Martin V. at Florence . 141416. For; un-s of Naples 132 Rise of Braccio 133 CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME. A.D. PAGE 1417. Braccio in Rome . 134 1419. Alliance of Martin V. with Giovanna II 135 June i. Submission of Baldassare Cossa . 136 Martin V. suspicious of Giovanna II. 138 in Florence 8 Feb. , 1420. Braccio i3 June. Sforza declares for Louis III. of Anjou .... 140 Alliance of Giovanna II. with Alfonso V. of Aragon . 140 Discontent of Martin V. with the Florentines . .141 Sept. Martin V. goes to Rome 142 1422. Peace in Naples *43 1423. Giovanna II. adopts Louis of Anjou 144 October. Alfonso leaves Naples 145 at . April. Martin V. summons a Council Pavia . .145 to Siena July. Council transferred ....... 146 Aug. -Nov. Contest about safe-conduct ....... 147 Intrigues of the Curial party 147 Feb., 1424. The Reformers abandoned by the Franco . .149 March. Dissolution of the Council of Siena 149 1425. Reform Constitution of Martin V 150 Death of Sforza Jan. , 1424. 151 June. Death of Braccio 152 1424-30. Martin V. recovers the States of the Church . .152 Nov., 1424. Death of Benedict XIII 154 1429. End of the anti-Popes 154 CHAPTER II. MARTIN V. AND THE PAPAL RESTORATION. BEGINNINGS OF EUGENIU6 IV. 14251432. 1420-25. Martin V. and France * . 156 1423. Martin V. reproves Archbishop Chichele 157 1426-27. Martin V. makes Henry Beaufort Cardinal and legate . 157 1427-28. Martin V. humbles Archbishop Chichele . 158 1429. Beaufort's Crusade against the Hussites . 160 Results of Martin V.'s policy in England 160 Architectural works of Martin V. 161 Martin V. and his Cardinals ..... 161 Coijrt of Martin V 162 Feb., 1431.
Recommended publications
  • QUESTION 39 Schism We Next Have to Consider the Vices That Are Opposed to Peace and That Involve Deeds: Schism (Schisma) (Quest

    QUESTION 39 Schism We Next Have to Consider the Vices That Are Opposed to Peace and That Involve Deeds: Schism (Schisma) (Quest

    QUESTION 39 Schism We next have to consider the vices that are opposed to peace and that involve deeds: schism (schisma) (question 39); strife (rixa) (question 41); sedition (seditio) (question 42); and war (bellum) (question 40). On the first topic there are four questions: (1) Is schism a special sin? (2) Is schism a more serious sin than unbelief? (3) Do schismatics have any power? (4) Are schismatics appropriately punished with excommunication? Article 1 Is schism a special sin? It seems that schism is not a special sin: Objection 1: As Pope Pelagius says, “Schism (schisma) sounds like scissor (scissura).” But every sin effects some sort of cutting off—this according to Isaiah 59:2 (“Your sins have cut you off from your God”). Therefore, schism is not a special sin. Objection 2: Schismatics seem to be individuals who do not obey the Church. But a man becomes disobedient to the precepts of the Church through every sin, since sin, according to Ambrose, “is disobedience with respect to the celestial commandments.” Therefore, every sin is an instance of schism. Objection 3: Heresy likewise cuts a man off from the unity of the Faith. Therefore, if the name ‘schism’ implies being cut off, then schism does not seem to differ as a special sin from the sin of unbelief. But contrary to this: In Contra Faustum Augustine distinguishes schism from heresy as follows: “Schism is believing the same things as the others and worshiping with the same rites, but being content merely to split the congregation, whereas heresy is believing things that are diverse from what the Catholic Church believes.” Therefore, schism is not a general sin.
  • Merton College Bylaws As at 2021-06-21

    Merton College Bylaws As at 2021-06-21

    MERTON COLLEGE BYLAWS MADE FOR THE COLLEGE BY THE GOVERNING BODY UNDER STATUTE 2.7 As amended to 21 June 2021 Chapters I. The Governing Body II. The Warden III. The Fellows IV. College Officers Part I: General Provisions Part II: Statutory Officers other than Tutors or Lecturers (in statutory order) Part III: Non-Statutory College Officers (in alphabetical order) Part IV: The Tutors and Lecturers of the College Part V: The Dean and Keeper of the Statutes V. Junior Members & Life Members VI. Administration Part I: Relating to the Buildings and Amenities of the College Part II: Administrative Offices Part III: Relating to Teaching and Research Part IV: Relating to Accommodation Part V: Financial Provisions (including Accounts, Expenditure, Expenses, Allowances, &c.) Part VI: Miscellaneous Administrative Provisions Part VII: Fixed-Term Employees (Fellows of the College) Part VIII: The Merton Nursery VII. Committees, Sub-Committees, Forums, and Panels VIII. Academic Staff IX. Non-Academic Staff X. The Common Table, The Common Room, College Dinners and Entertainment Part I: The Common Room Part II: The Common Table Part III: College Dinners and Entertainment XI. Discipline and Fitness to Study of Junior Members XI A: Academic Discipline XI B: Discipline for Serious Misconduct XI C: Failure in the First Public Examination XI D: Suspension and Fitness to Study Appendices A. Bylaw VI.1(b): Commemoration of Benefactors B. Bylaw VI.39: Policies adopted by the Governing Body 1. EJRA Policy 2012 2. Information Security a. Information Security Policy 2018 b. Data Protection Policy 2018 c. Data Protection Breach Regulations 2018 d. Mobile Device Security Regulations 2018 e.
  • Slezský Sborník Acta Silesiaca

    Slezský Sborník Acta Silesiaca

    SLEZSKÝ SBORNÍK ACTA SILESIACA ROČNÍK CVIII / 2010 ČÍSLO 1–2 STUDIE / ARTICLES Robert ANTONÍN: Jan Lucemburský a slezská knížata v letech 1327–1329 5–21 John the Blind and Princes of Silesia in the Years 1327–1329 The study based on the analysis of narrative sources and sources of diplomatic character shows that in Polish politics of John the Blind in the 1320s is discernible a long-term tendency to subdue the Silesian territories. Firstly, they formed a buffer zone between the traditional Bohemian crown lands and parts of Poland that were controlled by Władysław I the Elbow-high (Pol. Łokietek), secondly, they represented an important centre of Central-European economy. Key Words: Middle Ages; history of Silesia; John the Blind; John of Bohemia; John of Luxembourg; 14th century; Princes of Silesia Mario MÜLLER: Der Glogauer Erbfolgestreit (1476–1482) zwischen den 22–59 Markgrafen von Brandenburg, Herzog Johann II. von Sagan und Matthias Corvinus, König von Ungarn und Böhmen The Głogów war of succession (1476–1482) between the margrave of Brandenburg, Duke John (Johann) II of Żagań and King Matthias Corvinus of Hungary and Bohemia Válka o hlohovské dědictví (1476–1482) mezi braniborskými markrabaty, kníņetem Janem II. Zaháňským a uherským a českým králem Matyáńem Korvínem The Głogów (Germ. Glogau) war of succession describes the war between the margrave of Brandenburg and Duke John II of Żagań (Germ. Sagan) over the Duchy of Głogów. It broke out after the death of Duke Henry XI on February 22nd, 1476, and found its end in the Treaty of Kamenz in September 1482. This war of succession obtained nationwide significance because of the contemporary confu- sion over the Bohemian throne, fought between King Matthias and Vladislav II, son of the Polish King Casimir IV Jagiełło.
  • Anatomy of Melancholy by Democritus Junior

    Anatomy of Melancholy by Democritus Junior

    THE ANATOMY OF MELANCHOLY WHAT IT IS WITH ALL THE KINDS, CAUSES, SYMPTOMS, PROGNOSTICS, AND SEVERAL CURES OF IT IN THREE PARTITIONS; WITH THEIR SEVERAL SECTIONS, MEMBERS, AND SUBSECTIONS, PHILOSOPHICALLY, MEDICINALLY, HISTORICALLY OPENED AND CUT UP BY DEMOCRITUS JUNIOR [ROBERT BURTON] WITH A SATIRICAL PREFACE, CONDUCING TO THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSE PART 2 – The Cure of Melancholy Published by the Ex-classics Project, 2009 http://www.exclassics.com Public Domain CONTENTS THE SYNOPSIS OF THE SECOND PARTITION............................................................... 4 THE SECOND PARTITION. THE CURE OF MELANCHOLY. .............................................. 13 THE FIRST SECTION, MEMBER, SUBSECTION. Unlawful Cures rejected.......................... 13 MEMB. II. Lawful Cures, first from God. .................................................................................... 16 MEMB. III. Whether it be lawful to seek to Saints for Aid in this Disease. ................................ 18 MEMB. IV. SUBSECT. I.--Physician, Patient, Physic. ............................................................... 21 SUBSECT. II.--Concerning the Patient........................................................................................ 23 SUBSECT. III.--Concerning Physic............................................................................................. 26 SECT. II. MEMB. I....................................................................................................................... 27 SUBSECT. I.--Diet rectified in substance...................................................................................
  • Pdfeast-West-Schism.Pdf 97 KB

    Pdfeast-West-Schism.Pdf 97 KB

    Outline the events that lead to an overall schism between the church of the East and the West. Was such a schism inevitable given the social, political and ecclesiastical circumstances? Name: Iain A. Emberson Module: Introducing Church History Essay Number: 1 Tutor: Richard Arding Date: 11 November 2009 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Greek and Latin Cultural Differences 3. Rome and Constantinople 4. The Filioque 5. The Iconoclastic Controversy 6. The Photian Schism 7. Excommunication and Final Schism 8. Aftermath and Reflection 9. Conclusion 10. Bibliography 2 1. Introduction The East-West Schism (also known as the Great Schism) resulted in the division of Christianity into Eastern (Greek) and Western (Latin) branches. The mutual excommunications in 1054 marked the climax to a long period of tension between the two streams of Christianity and resulted from, amongst other things, cultural, linguistic, political and theological differences that had built up over time. Here we examine a number of these differences and their ultimate culmination in dividing East from West. 2. Greek and Latin Cultural Differences In his work 'Turning Points', Noll argues that “As early as the first century, it was possible to perceive pointed differences between the representatives of what would one day be called East and West.” 1 The Eastern Orthodox theologian Timothy Ware expands on this: From the start, Greeks and Latins had each approached the Christian mystery in their own way. At the risk of some oversimplification, it can be said that the Latin approach was more practical, the Greek more speculative; Latin thought was influenced by judicial ideas...while the Greeks understood theology in the context of worship and in the light of the Holy Liturgy..
  • The Short Outline of the History of the Czech Lands in The

    The Short Outline of the History of the Czech Lands in The

    Jana Hrabcova 6th century – the Slavic tribes came the Slavic state in the 9th century situated mostly in Moravia cultural development resulted from the mission of Saints Cyril and Methodius – 863 translation of the Bible into the slavic language, preaching in slavic language → the Christianity widespread faster They invented the glagolitic alphabet (glagolitsa) 885 – Methodius died → their disciples were expeled from G.M. – went to Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia etc., invented cyrilic script http://www.filmcyrilametodej.cz/en/about-film/ The movie (document) about Cyril and Methodius the centre of the duchy in Bohemia Prague the capital city 10th century – duke Wenceslaus → assassinated by his brother → saint Wenceslaus – the saint patron of the Czech lands the Kingdom of Bohemia since the end of 12th century Ottokar II (1253–1278, Přemysl Otakar II) – The Iron and Golden King very rich and powerful – his kingdom from the Krkonoše mountains to the Adriatic sea 1278 – killed at the battle of Dürnkrut (with Habsburgs) Wenceslaus II of Bohemia (1278–1305) – king of Bohemia, King of Poland Wenceslaus III (1305–1306) – assassinated without heirs The kingdom of Ottokar II The Kingdom of Wenceslaus II Around 1270 around 1301 John of Bohemia (1310–1346, John the Blind) married Wenceslaus’s sister Elizabeth (Eliška) Charles IV the king of Bohemia (1346–1378) and Holy Roman Emperor (1355–1378) . The Holy Roman Empire (962–1806) – an empire existing in Europe since 962 till 1806, ruled by Roman Emperor (present –day territories of Germany, Austria, the Czech Republic, Switzerland and Liechenstein, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, parts of eastern France, nothern Italy and western Poland) the most important and the best known Bohemian king 1356 - The Golden Bull – the basic law of the Holy Roman Empire Prague became his capital, and he rebuilt the city on the model of Paris, establishing the New Town of Prague (Nové Město), Charles Bridge, and Charles Square, Karlštejn Castle etc.
  • Tanulmányt Alap

    Tanulmányt Alap

    'W,- Ö -χ "V& > f\ • % :\i.\<; YA iíoiísza(ÍI Κ I I; Л Ь A I TANULMÁNYT ALAP \ í \i 1 í ^M'íi^i íí'k'Vi ^rjl'x" • ч r • M /w i i ι ΛΙ Γ,ΓνΜ χ, i l i, Λ EIN r \ Ι UN : \'I '/ Jο^ ιv i' ,·л \ τi JA w. »g ? .· νν тi м\ Ул V wO/jу Vί 71\ ϊ ilί i \ i Τ ? VEZÉ KORMÁNYOK. \ r~ \ ι X / \ / \ Λ VALLAS KS ΚΟΖΟΚΤΛΤΑΚΠίΥΙ Μ. Κ11. MIXI ST КI ί MK< Míi/ASÁI'.OL. Ρ UDAPESTEN. NYOMATOTT Λ ΜΛΟΥΛΙί ΚίΙί. J.OYΈΤΚΜΙ KÖN ΥΥΝ ΥΟ.ΜΟΛΒΛΧ. № η V' Y. 1 S A f) ' V Ov ' 4 9 / ; 4: с f А ζ' г χ' {1 ί f ί A MAGYARORSZÁGI KIR TANULMÁNYI ALAP JOGI r _ r r, TERMESZETENEK MEGVIZSGÁL AS ARA SZOLGÁLÓ YE ZÉRÓK MÁN Y OK. A VALLÁS ÉS KÖZOKTATÁSÜGYI M. KIR. MINISTER MEGBÍZÁSÁBÓL. ÁLL. POLGÁRI I3K. TANI10KÉPZÖ INT. KÖNYVTÁRA jf Érteett: 19 dÂÂ^s1 Leltári szÁm Csoportszám·^ | BUDAPESTEN. NYOMATOTT A MAGYAR KIR. EGYETEMI KÖNYVNYOMDÁBAN. A magyarországi kir. tanulmányi alapjogi természetének megvizsgálására szolgáló vezérokmányok jegyzéke. Lap. Lap. I. XIV. Kelemen pápának a jezsuita-rend meg- IX. D. e. Mária Terézia római császárné és ma- szüntetése iránt 1773.* évi julius 21-én kiadott gyar királynő alapitó-levele 1780. évi marczius brevéje 1 25-éről a jezsuita-rend vagyonából a magyar és horvát tanulmányi alap alakítása, és a magyar II. D. e. Mária Terézia római császárné és magyar tanulmányi és az egyetemi alap némely javainak királynőnek a m. k. helytartótanácshoz 1773. kicserélése iránt 35 évi september 20-án intézett leirata, melylyel a megszüntetett jezsuita-rend vagyonának a X.
  • Ungleiche Entwicklung in Zentraleuropa. Galizien

    Ungleiche Entwicklung in Zentraleuropa. Galizien

    Ungleiche Entwicklung in Zentraleuropa SOZIAL- UND WIRTSCHAFTSHISTORISCHE STUDIEN Institut für Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte Universität Wien Gegründet von Alfred Hoffmann und Michael Mitterauer Herausgegeben von Carsten Burhop, Markus Cerman, Franz X. Eder, Josef Ehmer, Peter Eigner, Thomas Ertl, Erich Landsteiner und Andrea Schnöller Wissenschaftlicher Beirat: Birgit Bolognese-Leuchtenmüller Ernst Bruckmüller Alois Ecker Herbert Knittler Andrea Komlosy Michael Mitterauer Andrea Pühringer Reinhard Sieder Hannes Stekl Dieter Stiefel Band 37 Klemens Kaps UNGLEICHE ENTWICKLUNG IN ZENTR ALEUROPA Galizien zwischen überregionaler Verflechtung und imperialer Politik (1772–1914) 2015 Böhlau Verlag Wien Köln Weimar The research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) : PUB 214-V16 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek : Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie ; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © 2015 by Böhlau Verlag Ges.m.b.H., Wien Köln Weimar Wiesingerstraße 1, A-1010 Wien, www.boehlau-verlag.com Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist unzulässig. Lektorat : Dr. Andrea Schnöller, Wien Satz : Michael Rauscher, Wien Druck und Bindung : Prime Rate, Budapest Gedruckt auf chlor- und säurefrei gebleichtem Papier Printed in the EU ISBN 978-3-205-79638-1 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Danksagung ................................
  • The Ginger Fox's Two Crowns Central Administration and Government in Sigismund of Luxembourg's Realms

    The Ginger Fox's Two Crowns Central Administration and Government in Sigismund of Luxembourg's Realms

    Doctoral Dissertation THE GINGER FOX’S TWO CROWNS CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNMENT IN SIGISMUND OF LUXEMBOURG’S REALMS 1410–1419 By Márta Kondor Supervisor: Katalin Szende Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department, Central European University, Budapest in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies, CEU eTD Collection Budapest 2017 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 6 I.1. Sigismund and His First Crowns in a Historical Perspective 6 I.1.1. Historiography and Present State of Research 6 I.1.2. Research Questions and Methodology 13 I.2. The Luxembourg Lion and its Share in Late-Medieval Europe (A Historical Introduction) 16 I.2.1. The Luxembourg Dynasty and East-Central-Europe 16 I.2.2. Sigismund’s Election as King of the Romans in 1410/1411 21 II. THE PERSONAL UNION IN CHARTERS 28 II.1. One King – One Land: Chancery Practice in the Kingdom of Hungary 28 II.2. Wearing Two Crowns: the First Years (1411–1414) 33 II.2.1. New Phenomena in the Hungarian Chancery Practice after 1411 33 II.2.1.1. Rex Romanorum: New Title, New Seal 33 II.2.1.2. Imperial Issues – Non-Imperial Chanceries 42 II.2.2. Beginnings of Sigismund’s Imperial Chancery 46 III. THE ADMINISTRATION: MOBILE AND RESIDENT 59 III.1. The Actors 62 III.1.1. At the Travelling King’s Court 62 III.1.1.1. High Dignitaries at the Travelling Court 63 III.1.1.1.1. Hungarian Notables 63 III.1.1.1.2. Imperial Court Dignitaries and the Imperial Elite 68 III.1.1.2.
  • Form: Rcia Supplemental Marriage Information

    Form: Rcia Supplemental Marriage Information

    DOCUMENT 615C FORM: RCIA SUPPLEMENTAL MARRIAGE INFORMATION PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY -- CORRECT SPELLING OF NAMES IS MOST IMPORTANT Current Last Name: Maiden Name (if applicable): Given Name(s): Sex □ M □ F CURRENT MARITAL STATUS: ✓ all applicable items □ Engaged to be Married (Complete Section I) □ Currently Married by Religious Service; Civil; etc (Complete Section II) □ Previously Married (Complete Section III) □ Current Fiancé(e) or Spouse was previously married (Complete Section III) SECTION I | ENGAGED TO BE MARRIED 1) Will this be your first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete SECTION III. 2) Name of Fiancé(e): 3) Is this your Fiancé(e)’s first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete SECTION III. 4) Is your Fiancé(e) baptized? □ Yes □ No; If Yes, what Christian denomination? 5) If no, what faith tradition (if any) does he/she identify with? 6) In what kind of celebration or ritual will your upcoming marriage be witnessed? □ Catholic (Latin or Eastern Rite); □ Orthodox; □ Christian (Other); □ Religion (Other); | □ Civil/Non-Faith. Notations (if any): 7) Who will preside at your wedding? □ Priest/Deacon; □ Non-Catholic Minister; □ Justice of the Peace; □ Other: 8) If you are wanting your marriage recognized by the Catholic Church, have you discussed either of the following with your Parish Priest?: □ a Marriage Dispensation; □ a Convalidation (“Blessing”) 615C- Supplemental Marriage Information 2018/03 Page 1 of 4 DOCUMENT 615C SECTION II | CURRENT MARRIAGE (RELIGIOUS SERVICE: CIVIL; ETC.): 1) Is this your first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete Section III. 2) Name of Spouse: 3) Is this your Spouse’s first marriage? □ Yes □ No; If no, please complete Section III.
  • The College and Canons of St Stephen's, Westminster, 1348

    The College and Canons of St Stephen's, Westminster, 1348

    The College and Canons of St Stephen’s, Westminster, 1348 - 1548 Volume I of II Elizabeth Biggs PhD University of York History October 2016 Abstract This thesis is concerned with the college founded by Edward III in his principal palace of Westminster in 1348 and dissolved by Edward VI in 1548 in order to examine issues of royal patronage, the relationships of the Church to the Crown, and institutional networks across the later Middle Ages. As no internal archive survives from St Stephen’s College, this thesis depends on comparison with and reconstruction from royal records and the archives of other institutions, including those of its sister college, St George’s, Windsor. In so doing, it has two main aims: to place St Stephen’s College back into its place at the heart of Westminster’s political, religious and administrative life; and to develop a method for institutional history that is concerned more with connections than solely with the internal workings of a single institution. As there has been no full scholarly study of St Stephen’s College, this thesis provides a complete institutional history of the college from foundation to dissolution before turning to thematic consideration of its place in royal administration, music and worship, and the manor of Westminster. The circumstances and processes surrounding its foundation are compared with other such colleges to understand the multiple agencies that formed St Stephen’s, including that of the canons themselves. Kings and their relatives used St Stephen’s for their private worship and as a site of visible royal piety.
  • The Birth of an Empire of Two Churches : Church Property

    The Birth of an Empire of Two Churches : Church Property

    The Birth of an Empire of Two Churches: Church Property, Theologians, and the League of Schmalkalden CHRISTOPHER OCKER ID THE CREATION OF PROTESTANT CHURCHES IN GERMANY during Luther’s generation follow someone’s intentions? Heiko Oberman, appealing to a medieval DLuther, portrays the reformer as herald of a dawning apocalypse, a monk at war with the devil, who expected God to judge the world and rescue Christians with no help from human institutions, abilities, and processes.1 This Luther could not have intended the creation of a new church. Dorothea Wendebourg and Hans-Jürgen Goertz stress the diversity of early evangelical movements. Goertz argues that anticlericalism helped the early Reformation’s gamut of spiritual, political, economic, and social trends to coalesce into moderate and radical groups, whereas Wendebourg suggests that the movements were only united in the judgment of the Counter Reformation.2 Many scholars concede this diversity. “There were very many different Reformations,” Diarmaid McCulloch has recently observed, aimed “at recreating authentic Catholic Christianity.”3 But some intention to form a new church existed, even if the intention was indirect. Scholars have identified the princely reaction to the revolting peasants of 1524–1525 as the first impetus toward political and institutional Protestantism.4 There was a 1Heiko A. Oberman, Die Wirkung der Reformation: Probleme und Perspektiven, Institut für Europäische Geschichte Mainz Vorträge 80 (Wiesbaden, 1987), 46; idem, Luther: Man between God and the Devil (New York, 1992), passim; idem, “Martin Luther zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit,” in Die Reformation: Von Wittenberg nach Genf (Göttingen, 1987), 189–207; Scott Hendrix, “‘More Than a Prophet’: Martin Luther in the Work of Heiko Oberman,” in The Work of Heiko A.