Bbm:978-94-015-8181-3/1.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bbm:978-94-015-8181-3/1.Pdf INDEXES INDEX OF NAMES Abaris 344 320,471 Abel 70, 104, 248, 447, 450 Alcinous (pseudo-), see Albinus of Smyrna Abelard, Peter 244, 375, 402, 405, 424, 425, Alcmaeon of Croton 189, 269 431 Alcuin of York 402 Abraham 70, 78, 96, 104, 105, 108, III, Il3, Alderotti, Taddeo (physician) 80 Il4, Il8, 121, 126 217, 227, 242, 249, 305, Aldo di Asolo (printer) 86 n 310, 447, 455 Aldobrandini, Pietro (Cardinal) 156, 157 Aceti, G. 442 Aldobrandini, Tommaso 156, 157, 158 Adam (Adamus), Melchior 70, 74, 97, 113, Alessandro di Sangro, Bishop of Bene- 128 vento 46 Adam xxiii, 52, 69, 70, 77, 91, 96, 100, 101, Alexander of Aphrodisias 43, 102, Il7, 216, 104, 107, 114, 115, 126, 215, 217, 238, 247, 230, 443, 467 251, 307, 310, 349, 446, 454, 466 Alexander of Hales 56, 456 Adrian VI, Pope (Adrian of Utrecht) 385 Alexander the Great 109, 131, 139, 166 Aegidius Romanus 27, 80, 102 Alexandre de Villedieu (Alexander de Aelian (Claudius Aelianus) 150 Villa Dei) 80 Aeschines Socraticus 180 Alfarabi, see al-Farabi Aeschylus 172, 173 Alfonso X (the Wise), King of Castile and Aesculapius 105, 109, 110 Leon 75,80 Aesop 73, 105 Algasel, see al-Ghazzali Aetius of Antioch 458 Allacci (Allatius), Leone 17B, 194 Agenor, King of the Phoenicians 108, Il2 Allen, M.]. B. 61 Aglaophemus 16, 24, Il2, Il7, 297 Allut, P. 63 Agricola, Rudolph 143, 242, 385 Amabile, L. xviii Agrippa von Nettesheim, Heinrich Cor- Amalric (Amaury) of Bene, 432 nelius 49, 51 n, 64, 447 Ammonius Alexandrinus (Eclectic philo- Aguzzi Barbagli, D. 24 sopher, teacher of Plutarch) 230 Alberti, A. 146 Ammonius Hermiae Il7 Alberti, Leon Battista 39, 40 Ammonius Saccas 18, 43, 191, 305, 320 Albertus Magnus 27, 56, 80, 94, 102, 216, Amphion 105, 346 244, 400, 402, 402, 425, 443, 456 Anacharsis (Scythian philosopher) 94, Albinus of Smyrna 152, 187, 193, 194, 305, 130, 179,344 Index ifNames Anacreon (lyric poet) 172 xxxiii, 4, 6, 7, 10, II, 13, 19, 21, 22, 23, Anaxagoras II, 26 n, 43, 73, 92, 94, 97, 99, 26-37, 40, 43, 44, 45, 47, 53, 56, 57, 62, 127, 130, 133, 140, 149, 185, 186, 215, 227, 68, 71, 73, 90, 92, 94-8, 101, 102, IIO, 234, 26 9, 276, 305, 340, 354, 365, 443 II6, II7, 121, 122, 125, 129, 130, 132, 135, Anaxarchus of Abdera 73, 127, 130, 131, 138, 139, 140, 142, 144, 148, 149, 151, 154, 180, 191, 196, 269 166,167,180,188,192,193,195,213,216, Anaximander II, 43, 73, 92, 97, 99, 127, 149, 218-21, 228, 230, 233, 243, 247, 250, 251, 179, 186, 192, 196, 227, 250, 269, 305, 261-70, 274, 275, 285, 299,3°1,317,318, 443 319, 323, 356, 364, 376, 377, 380, 383, Anaximenes II, 26 n, 43, 73, 97, 98, 127, 175, 384, 390-94, 400, 406, 412-14, 416, 179, 227, 269, 305, 443 417, 422 , 426 , 428, 429, 43 2-4, 43 6, Anderson, F. H. 170 438, 439, 443, 444, 447, 448, 457, 459, Anderson, P. R. 291 463, 467, 472 Andrea di Asolo (printer) 86 n Arius 34 Andreae, Samuel 289 Arnobius 448 Andreae, Tobias see d'Andre, Tobie Arrian (Flavius Arrianus) 150 Andronicus of Rhodes 102, 444, 448 Ashworth, E. J. 103 Anicetus, Pope 431 Aspelin, G 290 Anniceris the Cyrenaic 180, 227 Athenodorus of Soloi 128 Annius of Viterbo 100 Atlas 94 Antiochus of Ascalon 43, 180, 228, 457 Atticus, Titus Pomponius 87 Antipater of Sidon (mte of Tarsus) 128 Attilius Regolus, Marcus 131 Antipater of Tarsus 180,228 Augustine, St 7, 9, 16, 29, 38, 47, 52, 57, 68, Antisthenes (founder of the Cynics) 92, 70, 93, 101, 104, II4, II8, 126, 127, 220, 127, 130, 180, 227, 230, 447 243, 260, 305, 316, 317, 323, 401, 406, Antonaci, A. 62 450, 459, 471 Apollinaris, Bishop of Laodicea 458 Aulotte, R. 5In Apollo 217, 248, 300 Aulus Gellius 7, 127, 456 Apollonius ofTyana 244 Ausonius, Decimus Magnus 172 Apuleius of Madaura 16, 127, 230,305, 422, Austin, W. H. 291, 292 456 Aventinus, see Thurmair, Johannes Aquinas, see Thomas Aquinas Averroes 26 n, 94, 139, 140, 216, 219, 228, Arcesilaus (founder of the middle Acad­ 230, 244, 382, 444, 448, 467 emy) 10, 18, 43, 49, 93, 130, 180, 227, Avicebron, see Ibn Gabirol 230, 262 Avicenna 16, 26 n, 102, 444, 448 Archedemus of Tarsus (Stoic) 128 Ayers, M. R. xxiii Archelaus of Miletus (physicist) II, 127, 140, 179, 186, 468 Bacchus 300 Archimedes 381 Bacon, Francis xvii, xxxii, 3, 66, 84, 143, Archytas of Tarentum 189, 243, 250, 269 144, 163-71, 173, 205, 206, 221, 239, 286, Aristaeus 147 294, 335, 373, 407, 410, 425, 438, 459, Aristarchus of Samos 135, 381 456,459 Aristippus ofCyrene 73,127,13°,180,187, Bacon, Roger 80 190, 194, 468 Badaloni, N. 99, 146, 369 Aristo (Ariston) of Chios (Stoic philoso- Bai:f, Jean-Antoine de 36 n pher) 128 Balbi, Giovanni (da Genova), see Balbus, Aristophanes of Byzantium 187 Johannes (of Genoa) Aristophanes 105, 178 Baldini, U. 137, 149 Aristotle xv, xvi, xxviii, xxix, xxx, XXXl, Baldo, 1. F. xx Index of Names 479 Balbus (or Baldus), Johannes (of Genoa) Bertelli, S. 169 80 Berti, E. 62, 387, 442 Baldwin, J. M. 20I Bessarion, Ioannes (Cardinal) 16, 26, 29, Balsamo, L. 74, 82, 85 47, 97, 385, 456 BaM, A. xxii, 201, 202, 289 Bias (one of the Seven Wise Men of Barbaro, Daniele, Bishop of Aquileia 89 Greece) 130, 179, 269 Barbaro, Ermolao 26, 385 Biel, Gabriel 56, 216, 239, 244, 384 Barbaro, Marco 90 Binder (Binderus), C. 424n Barbieri, F. 75 Bini, V. !O3 Barnes, A. 2II Bion the Borysthenite 130, 180 Baron, H. 7, 59 Blackwell, C. W. T. xvii, xxiv, 203 Baronius, Cardinal 58, 407 Bloch, Olivier 146 Barotti, Giannandrea !O3 Blount, Charles 367 Basil of Caesarea 448 Blum, P. R. 387 Basilides (Gnostic) 431 Bochart, Samuel 296 Basnage,Jacques 329,33°,367 Boder (Boederus), Johann Henirich II3 Basso, Girolamo !O7 n Bodin, Jean 425 Basson (Bassonius), Sebastien 132-3 Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus 16, Battafarano, I. M. 85 29, !O2, 443, 456 Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 435 Boethus of Sidon (Stoic) 94, 99 Baxter, William 158 Bohatec, J. 2II Bay,J. C 74 Bohme, Jakob 461 Bayle, Pierre xvi, 103, 199, 202, 208, 234, Boileau, Gilles 158 235, 430, 439, 441 Bolduan (Bolduanus), Paulus 77-8 Beatus Rhenanus, see Rhenanus, Beatus Bonanate, U. 370 Beauregard, see Berigard, Claude Guiller- Bonaventure, St (Giovanni Fidanza) 80, met de 4°2 Bede (the Venerable) 401 Bonilla y San Martin 60 Bekker, Balthasar 263 Boninsegna, Giovanni Battista 60 Bellarmine, Robert (Cardinal) 403 Bor (Borrius), Salomon 177 Bellucci, M. 49 Borromeo, Carlo 24 Belus 184 Bottin, Francesco xx, xxxiii, xxix Ben, H. 146 Bouillier, F. 221 Benedetti, L. 288 Boureau -Deslandes, Andre-F ranc;:ois Beni, Paolo 35 xxxiii, 368 Beniveni, Gerolamo, 172, 187, 320 Bourguet, Louis 439 Benouis, M. K. 36 n Bowen, B. C. 64 Bentley, Richard 169, 194 Boxhorn, Marcus Suerius van 4II Beonio Brocchieri, V. 129 Boyle, Robert 164 Berengarius of Tours 402, 424 Braccio, Marcello, see Marcello, Braccio Berigard, Claude Guillermet de xxxi, 71, Bracciolini, Poggio, see Poggio Bracciolini 120, 147-9 Bradwardine, Thomas 325 Bernal, M. xxiv Brahe, Tycho 135, 175 Bernardi, Giovanni Battista, 36, 37, 64, Braun, L. xiii, xiv, xv, xvi, xvii, xxii, xxiii, 169 xxix, xxxiv, 9 n, 59, 64, 74, 76, 78, 80, Bernardini, A. 85, 235 85, 88, 90, 96, II3, II8, 124, 129, 133, 159, Beroaldo the Elder, Filippo 39, 40 160, 169, 176, 206, 209, 2II, 235, 252, Berossus (Chaldean priest and historian) 289, 290, 303, 330, 335, 343, 370, 387, 91, II4, 184, 217 398, 409, 442 Index of Names Brehier, E. xiii, xiv, xv, xvii, xxii, 289 Calvin, John 316-17, 324 Bricot, Thomas 403 Camerarius, Joachim 385 Brognolo, Benedetto 157 Campanella, Tommaso xvi, xvii, 61, 135, Brown, C. C. 291 240, 298, 407, 425 Brown, S. 291, 387 Campo, M. 442 Brucker, Johann Jakob xiii, xiv, xvii, xviii, Camutius, Andreas 63 xx, xxii, xxiv, xxxiii, 76, 80, 87, 90, II3, Canigiani, Antonio 15 129, 154, 169, 200, 202, 234, 235, 246, Cano, Melchior 403 258, 259, 277, 278, 329, 330, 335, 368 , Cantimori, Delio 57, 65 370, 397, 406, 408, 436, 438, 439, 440, Carboni (Carbo), Ludovico (da Costac- 441, 442, 460 ciaro) 69, 82, 99-103, Breen, Q 62 Cardano, Girolamo xvii, 85, 143, 324, 425 Brues, Guy. de, see De Brues, Guy Cario, Johannes 238, 407 Brugger, W. 133 Carmides (middle Platonist) 43 Bruni, Leonardo xv, xxix, 6, 9, 59, 244, Carneades 8, 10, 18, 43, 73, 123, 180, 181, 385 227, 230, 263, 264, 468, 469 Bruningius, Christianus (Christian Van Carpocrates of Alexandria (Gnostic) 431, Bruyn) I07n 461, 461 Bruno, Giordano xvii, 66, 314 Carpzov, J. 412 n, 421 Brush, C. B. 64 Casaubon, Isaac 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 173, Brydges, S. E. 172 183, 198, 240, 321, 351, 431 Bucher (Bucherus), Caspar II3-I4 Casaubon, Meric 158 Budde (Buddeus), Johann Franz xxvii, 45, Casimir, Henrik, Prince of Nassau 268 199, 202, 234, 328, 329, 362, 368 , 370, Casini, P. 369 389, 396, 438 Cassirer, E. xviii, 290 Buhle, Johann Gotdieb 124, 129, 154, 409, Castellani di Faenza, Giulio 36, 63 441 Casula, M. 103 Bullough, G. 171 Cato, Marcus Porcius (the Censor) 455 Buonafede, Appiano (Agatopisto Croma­ Cato, Marcus Porcius (Uticensis) 131,455, ziano) 76, 85, 89, 90, 129, 200, 202, 468 132, 330, 370, 397, 409 Cavini, W. 42 n, 64 Buoninsegni, Giovanni Battista 9 n Cebes of Thebes (disciple of Socrates and Burley (Burlaeus), Walter xv, 7, II, 60, Philolaus) 180 232,443 Cecchini Degan, A.
Recommended publications
  • Was Shakespeare a Ramist?
    The Oxfordian Volume 22 October 2020 ISSN 1521-3641 The OXFORDIAN The Oxfordian is the peer-reviewed journal of the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship, a non-profit educational organization that conducts research and publication on the Early Modern period, William Shakespeare and the authorship of Shakespeare’s works. Founded in 1998, the journal offers research articles, essays and book reviews by academicians and independent scholars, and is published annually during the autumn. Writers interested in being published in The Oxfordian should review our publication guidelines at the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship website: https://shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/the-oxfordian/ Our postal mailing address is: The Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship PO Box 66083 Auburndale, MA 02466 USA Queries may be directed to the editor, Gary Goldstein, at [email protected] Back issues of The Oxfordian may be obtained by writing to: [email protected] 2 The OXFORDIAN Volume 22 2020 Was Shakespeare a Ramist? Reviewed by Michael Dudley The Rational Shakespeare: Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship. By Michael Wainwright. Palgrave Macmillan 2018 (324 pp.) in hardcover, paperback and Kindle. he question regarding the authorship of the Works of Shakespeare has for generations been dismissed by most of the intelligentsia as patent Tnonsense or a conspiracy theory—in short, as highly irrational—with a correspondingly dim view of its proponents’ intelligence and sanity. It is therefore singularly refreshing and impres- sive that a scholarly work that acknowledges Edward de Vere as Shakespeare should be entirely premised on an exploration of rationalism, not only in terms of the worldview apparent in the Shakespeare canon, but as a structured argument unto itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Richard Peter Mckeon Papers 1918-1985
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Richard Peter McKeon Papers 1918-1985 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Acknowledgments 4 Descriptive Summary 4 Information on Use 4 Access 4 Citation 5 Biographical Note 5 Scope Note 6 Related Resources 7 Subject Headings 7 INVENTORY 8 Series I: Biographical Materials 8 Subseries 1: Professional Materials 8 Subseries 2: Personal Papers and Memorabilia 9 Subseries 3: Family Documents and Correspondence 10 Series II: Correspondence 11 Series III: Subject Files 41 Series IV: Writings 61 Subseries 1: Bibliography 62 Subseries 2: Reprints 62 Subseries 3: Books 63 Sub-subseries 1: William of Ockham Materials 63 Sub-subseries 2: Peter Abailard (Abelard), Sic et Non 65 Sub-subseries 3: Sic et Non Card Files 66 Sub-subseries 4: Other Books 71 Subseries 4: Published Articles 71 Subseries 5: Book Reviews 79 Subseries 6: Unpublished Materials 79 Subseries 7: Miscellaneous 86 Series V: Course Materials 101 Subseries 1: Lecture Notes 101 Subseries 2: Syllabi, Examinations, Handouts 114 Series VI: Conferences 121 Series VII: UNESCO Materials 127 Subseries 1: Preparatory Commission 128 Subseries 2: First General Conference, Paris 128 Subseries 3: Second General Conference, Mexico City 129 Subseries 4: Third General Conference, Beirut 130 Subseries 5: Fifth General Conference, Florence 131 Subseries 6: Sixth General Conference, Paris 131 Subseries 7: Programme Commission Reports 131 Subseries 8: Executive Board of UNESCO Meetings 132 Subseries 9: U.S. National Commission for UNESCO 132 Subseries 10: Miscellaneous 133 Series VIII: Encyclopaedia Britannica 137 Subseries 1: History 137 Subseries 2: Board of Editors Meetings 137 Subseries 3: Roof articles project 138 Subseries 4: Other Articles and Projects 139 Series IX: Miscellaneous Papers 140 Series X: Audio-Visual Materials 140 Subseries 1: Reel Tapes 141 Subseries 2: Microfilm and Glass Plates 144 Series XI: Recommendations and Evaluations 144 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.RPMCKEON Title McKeon, Richard Peter.
    [Show full text]
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The
    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Categories in the Early Roman Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, in Sehepunkte 15 (2015), Nr
    Citation style Andrea Falcon: Rezension von: Michael J. Griffin: Aristotle's Categories in the Early Roman Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, in sehepunkte 15 (2015), Nr. 7 [15.07.2015], URL:http://www.sehepunkte.de/2015/07/27098.html First published: http://www.sehepunkte.de/2015/07/27098.html copyright This article may be downloaded and/or used within the private copying exemption. Any further use without permission of the rights owner shall be subject to legal licences (§§ 44a-63a UrhG / German Copyright Act). sehepunkte 15 (2015), Nr. 7 Michael J. Griffin: Aristotle's Categories in the Early Roman Empire This is a book about the reception of Aristotle's Categories from the first century BC to the second century AD. The Categories does not appear to have circulated in the Hellenistic era. By contrast, this short but enigmatic treatise was at the center of the so-called return to Aristotle in the first century BC. The book under review tells us the story of this remarkable reversal of fortune. The main characters in this story are philosophers working in the three main philosophical traditions of post- Hellenistic philosophy. For the Peripatetic tradition, these are Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon. For the Academic and Platonic tradition, Eudorus of Alexandria and Lucius. For the Stoic tradition, Athenodorus and Cornutus. A supporting role is reserved to the following interpreters of the Categories : Aristo of Alexandria, Ps-Archytas, Nicostratus, Aspasius, Herminus, and Adrastus. In broad outline, the story told in the book goes as follows: Andronicus of Rhodes rescued the Categories from obscurity by deciding to place it at the beginning of his catalogue of Aristotle's writings (chapter 2).
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotelianism in the First Century BC
    CHAPTER 5 Aristotelianism in the First Century BC Andrea Falcon 1 A New Generation of Peripatetic Philosophers The division of the Peripatetic tradition into a Hellenistic and a post- Hellenistic period is not a modern invention. It is already accepted in antiquity. Aspasius speaks of an old and a new generation of Peripatetic philosophers. Among the philosophers who belong to the new generation, he singles out Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon.1 Strabo adopts a similar division. He too distinguishes between the older Peripatetics, who came immediately after Theophrastus, and their successors.2 He collectively describes the latter as better able to do philosophy in the manner of Aristotle (φιλοσοφεῖν καὶ ἀριστοτελίζειν). It remains unclear what Strabo means by doing philosophy in the manner of Aristotle.3 But he certainly thinks that the philosophers who belong to the new generation, and not those who belong to the old one, deserve the title of true Aristotelians. For Strabo, the event separating the old from the new Peripatos is the rediscovery and publication of Aristotle’s writings. We may want to resist Strabo’s negative characterization of the earlier Peripatetics. For Strabo, they were not able to engage in philosophy in any seri- ous way but were content to declaim general theses.4 This may be an unfair judgment, ultimately based on the anachronistic assumption that any serious philosophy requires engagement with an authoritative text.5 Still, the empha- sis that Strabo places on the rediscovery of Aristotle’s writings suggests that the latter were at the center of the critical engagement with Aristotle in the 1 Aspasius, On Aristotle’s Ethics 44.20–45.16.
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Trained Theologian
    THE WELL-TRAINED THEOLOGIAN essential texts for retrieving classical Christian theology part 1, patristic and medieval Matthew Barrett Credo 2020 Over the last several decades, evangelicalism’s lack of roots has become conspicuous. Many years ago, I experienced this firsthand as a university student and eventually as a seminary student. Books from the past were segregated to classes in church history, while classes on hermeneutics and biblical exegesis carried on as if no one had exegeted scripture prior to the Enlightenment. Sometimes systematics suffered from the same literary amnesia. When I first entered the PhD system, eager to continue my theological quest, I was given a long list of books to read just like every other student. Looking back, I now see what I could not see at the time: out of eight pages of bibliography, you could count on one hand the books that predated the modern era. I have taught at Christian colleges and seminaries on both sides of the Atlantic for a decade now and I can say, in all honesty, not much has changed. As students begin courses and prepare for seminars, as pastors are trained for the pulpit, they are not required to engage the wisdom of the ancient past firsthand or what many have labelled classical Christianity. Such chronological snobbery, as C. S. Lewis called it, is pervasive. The consequences of such a lopsided diet are now starting to unveil themselves. Recent controversy over the Trinity, for example, has manifested our ignorance of doctrines like eternal generation, a doctrine not only basic to biblical interpretation and Christian orthodoxy for almost two centuries, but a doctrine fundamental to the church’s Christian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Summit of Ancient Latin Mathematical Competence:Apuleius and Augustine
    Roskilde University The Summit of Ancient Latin Mathematical Competence Apuleius and Augustine Høyrup, Jens Published in: Actes du XIIIe Colloque Maghrébin sur l'Histoire des Mathématiques Arabes (COMHISMA13) Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Høyrup, J. (2018). The Summit of Ancient Latin Mathematical Competence: Apuleius and Augustine. In M. Abdeljaouad, & H. Hedfi (Eds.), Actes du XIIIe Colloque Maghrébin sur l'Histoire des Mathématiques Arabes (COMHISMA13) (pp. 157-170). COMHISHA. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 13e colloque maghrébin sur l’histoire des mathématiques arabes, Tunis 2018 THE SUMMIT OF ANCIENT LATIN MATHEMATICAL COMPETENCE: APULEIUS AND AUGUSTINE Jens HØYRUP Roskilde Universitetscenter (Danemark) Dedicated to Samia Ahasniou and Saliha Mostefai Abstract. According to all we know, Latin Antiquity was utterly unfamiliar with the theoretical aspects of mathematics; Quintilian did not know finger reckoning from geometry, while Cicero explains that the Romans were not interested.
    [Show full text]
  • Iconoclasm: a Christian Dilemma
    ICONOCLASM: A CHRISTIAN DILEMMA - A BYZANTINE CONTROVERSY By STEPHEN CHARLES STEACY •• Bachelor of Arts Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1969 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 1978 ICONOCLASM: A CHRISTIAN DILEMMA - A BYZANTINE CONTROVERSY Thesis Approved: '. ~- Dean of the Graduate College 1019541 ii P~F~E This thesis is concerned with Iconoclasm, the religious upheaval which troubled the Byzantine conscience for over a century. There have been numerous theories adduced by his­ torians to account for this phenomenon. It is the purpose of this study to view the varying interpretations, analyze their shortcomings, and to put forth a different view of the controversy, one that more adequately expresses the deeply rooted religious nature of the movement, a movement not only of the eighth and ninth centuries but an idea which was nurtured in fertile soil of the Old Testament and Apostolic Christianity. The author wishes to express heartfelt appreciation to his thesis adviser, Dr. George Jewsbury, whose unflagging solicitude, support, and inspiration were instrumental in the preparation of this work. A note of thanks is given to Mrs. Karen Hoyer, whose typing expertise, in the final analysis, made the difference between success and failure. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY 1 II. THEOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL COURSES OF THE CONTROVERSY. • • . • . • • . • . 13 Genesis of the Cult of Icons .•.• 13 The Scriptures as the Foundation of Iconoclasm. 26 Precursors of ·the Iconoclast Movement . 30 Origen . 31 Eusebius .
    [Show full text]
  • THE SENTENCES of SEXTUS Wisdom Literature from the Ancient World
    THE SENTENCES OF SEXTUS Wisdom Literature from the Ancient World Leo G. Perdue, General Editor Reinhard Gregor Kratz, Associate Editor Area Editors Bendt Alster Pancratius C. Beentjes Katharine Dell Edward L. Greenstein Victor Hurowitz John Kloppenborg Michael Kolarcik Manfred Oeming Bernd U. Schipper Günter Stemberger Loren T. Stuckenbruck Number 1 THE SENTENCES OF SEXTUS THE SENTENCES OF SEXTUS By Walter T. Wilson Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta THE SENTENCES OF SEXTUS Copyright © 2012 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions O! ce, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sentences of Sextus. The sentences of Sextus / Walter T. Wilson. p. cm. — (Wisdom literature from the ancient world ; number 1) ISBN 978-1-58983-719-5 (paper binding : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983-720-1 (electronic format) — ISBN 978-1-58983-727-0 (hardcover binding : alk. paper) 1. Christian life—Early works to 1800. 2. Sentences of Sextus. I. Sextus, Pythagoreus. II. Wilson, Walter T. III. Sentences of Sextus. English. 2012. IV. Sentences of Sextus. Greek. 2012. V. Title. VI. Series: Wisdom literature from the ancient world ; no. 1. BV4500.S4913 2012 248.4—dc23 2012041820 Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 standards for paper permanence.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Synopsis of the Aristotelian Commentary Tradition (In Less Than Sixty Minutes)
    HISTORICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN COMMENTARY TRADITION (IN LESS THAN SIXTY MINUTES) Fred D. Miller, Jr. CHAPTER 1 PERIPATETIC SCHOLARS Aristotle of Stagira (384–322 BCE) Exoteric works: Protrepticus, On Philosophy, Eudemus, etc. Esoteric works: Categories, Physics, De Caelo, Metaphysics, De Anima, etc. The legend of Aristotle’s misappropriated works Andronicus of Rhodes: first edition of Aristotle’s works (40 BCE) Early Peripatetic commentators Boethus of Sidon (c. 75—c. 10 BCE) comm. on Categories Alexander of Aegae (1st century CE)comm. on Categories and De Caelo Adrastus of Aphrodisias (early 1st century) comm. on Categories Aspasius (c. 131) comm. on Nicomachean Ethics Emperor Marcus Aurelius establishes four chairs of philosophy in Athens: Platonic, Peripatetic, Stoic, Epicurean (c. 170) Alexander of Aphrodisias (late 2nd —early 3rd century) Extant commentaries on Prior Analytics, De Sensu, etc. Lost comm. on Physics, De Caelo, etc. Exemplar for all subsequent commentators. Comm. on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Only books 1—5 of Alexander’s comm. are genuine; books 6—14 are by ps.-Alexander . whodunit? Themistius (c. 317—c. 388) Paraphrases of Physics, De Anima, etc. Paraphrase of Metaphysics Λ (Hebrew translation) Last of the Peripatetics CHAPTER 2 NEOPLATONIC SCHOLARS Origins of Neoplatonism Ammonius Saccas (c. 175—242) forefather of Neoplatonism Plotinus (c. 205—260) the Enneads Reality explained in terms of hypostases: THE ONE—> THE INTELLECT—>WORLD SOUL—>PERCEPTIBLE WORLD Porphyry of Tyre (232–309) Life of Plotinus On the School of Plato and Aristotle Being One On the Difference Between Plato and Aristotle Isagoge (Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories) What is Neoplatonism? A broad intellectual movement based on the philosophy of Plotinus that sought to incorporate and reconcile the doctrines of Plato, Pythagoras, and Aristotle with each other and with the universal beliefs and practices of popular religion (e.g.
    [Show full text]