DOCSLIB.ORG

Okanogan County Wildlife Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Okanogan County Wildlife Species List Washington Gap Analysis Project 288 Species Predicted or Breeding in: Okanogan County CODE COMMON NAME Amphibians RACAT Bullfrog RALU Columbia spotted frog SPIN Great basin spadefoot AMMA Long-toed salamander PSRE Pacific treefrog (Chorus frog) AMTI Tiger salamander BUBO Western toad Birds REAM American avocet BOLE American bittern FUAM American coot COBR American crow CIME American dipper CATR American goldfinch FASP American kestrel ANRUBE American pipit SERU American redstart TUMI American robin ANAAM American wigeon HALE Bald eagle RIRI Bank swallow HIRU Barn swallow STVA Barred owl BUIS Barrow's goldeneye CEAL Belted kingfisher CYNI Black swift CHNI Black tern PIAR Black-backed woodpecker PIPI Black-billed magpie PAAT Black-capped chickadee ARAL Black-chinned hummingbird PHME Black-headed grosbeak DEOB Blue grouse ANDI Blue-winged teal DOOR Bobolink PAHU Boreal chickadee AEFU Boreal owl EUCY Brewer's blackbird SPBR Brewer's sparrow CEAM Brown creeper MOAT Brown-headed cowbird CACAL California quail STELCA Calliope hummingbird BRCA Canada goose NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project CATME Canyon wren CACAS Cassin's finch VISO Cassin's vireo (Solitary vireo) BOCE Cedar waxwing PARU Chestnut-backed chickadee SPPA Chipping sparrow ALCH Chukar ANCY Cinnamon teal NUCO Clark's nutcracker HIPY Cliff swallow TYAL Common barn-owl BUCL Common goldeneye GAIM Common loon MERME Common merganser CHMI Common nighthawk PHNU Common poorwill COCOR Common raven GAGA Common snipe GETR Common yellowthroat ACCO Cooper's hawk JUHY Dark-eyed (Oregon) junco PIPU Downy woodpecker EMOB Dusky flycatcher PODNI Eared grebe TYTY Eastern kingbird STVU European starling COVE Evening grosbeak OTFL Flammulated owl PAIL Fox sparrow ANST Gadwall AQCH Golden eagle RESA Golden-crowned kinglet AMSA Grasshopper sparrow DUCA Gray catbird EMWR Gray flycatcher PECA Gray jay PEPE Gray partridge LETE Gray-crowned rosy finch (Rosy finch) ARHE Great blue heron STNE Great gray owl BUVI Great horned owl ANCR Green-winged teal PIVI Hairy woodpecker EMHA Hammond's flycatcher HIHI Harlequin duck CAGU Hermit thrush LOCUC Hooded merganser ERAL Horned lark CARME House finch PADO House sparrow TRAE House wren NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project CHVO Killdeer CHGR Lark sparrow PAAMO Lazuli bunting AYAF Lesser scaup MELE Lewis' woodpecker MELI Lincoln's sparrow LALU Loggerhead shrike NUAM Long-billed curlew ASOT Long-eared owl OPTO Macgillivray's warbler ANPL Mallard CIPA Marsh wren FACO Merlin SICU Mountain bluebird PAGA Mountain chickadee ZEMA Mourning dove VERU Nashville warbler COAU Northern flicker ACGE Northern goshawk CICY Northern harrier ANAC Northern pintail GLGN Northern pygmy-owl STSE Northern rough-winged swallow AEAC Northern saw-whet owl SENO Northern waterthrush COBO Olive-sided flycatcher VECE Orange-crowned warbler PAHA Osprey EMDI Pacific slope flycatcher (Western) POPO Pied-billed grebe DRPI Pileated woodpecker PIEN Pine grosbeak CAPI Pine siskin FAME Prairie falcon CARPU Purple finch LOXCU Red crossbill SITCA Red-breasted nuthatch SPRU Red-breasted sapsucker VIOL Red-eyed vireo AYAM Redhead SPNU Red-naped sapsucker POGR Red-necked grebe BUJA Red-tailed hawk AGPH Red-winged blackbird LADE Ring-billed gull AYCO Ring-necked duck PHCO Ring-necked pheasant COLI Rock dove SAOB Rock wren RECA Ruby-crowned kinglet OXJA Ruddy duck NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project BOUM Ruffed grouse SERUF Rufous hummingbird AMBE Sage sparrow ORMO Sage thrasher PASA Savannah sparrow SAYSA Say's phoebe ACST Sharp-shinned hawk TYPH Sharp-tailed grouse ASFL Short-eared owl MELME Song sparrow PORCA Sora STOC Spotted owl ACMA Spotted sandpiper PIER Spotted towhee (Rufous-sided) DECA Spruce grouse CYST Steller's jay BUSW Swainson's hawk CAUS Swainson's thrush PITR Three-toed woodpecker MYTO Townsend's solitaire DETO Townsend's warbler TABI Tree swallow CAAUR Turkey vulture IXNA Varied thrush CHVA Vaux's swift CAFU Veery POOGR Vesper sparrow TATH Violet-green swallow RALI Virginia rail VIGI Warbling vireo SIME Western bluebird TYVE Western kingbird STUNE Western meadowlark OTKE Western screech-owl PILU Western tanager COSO Western wood-pewee SICAR White-breasted nuthatch ZOLE White-crowned sparrow PIAL White-headed woodpecker LALE White-tailed ptarmigan AESA White-throated swift LOLE White-winged crossbill SPHTH Williamson's sapsucker EMTR Willow flycatcher PHTR Wilson's phalarope WIPU Wilson's warbler TRTR Winter wren AISP Wood duck DEPE Yellow warbler ICVI Yellow-breasted chat XAXA Yellow-headed blackbird NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project DECOR Yellow-rumped warbler Probable Breeding SPPAL Clay-colored sparrow Mammals TATA Badger CASCAN Beaver EPFU Big brown bat OVCA Bighorn sheep URAM Black bear LYRU Bobcat NECI Bushy-tailed woodrat MYOCA California myotis SPSA Cascade golden-mantled ground squirrel SPCO Columbian ground squirrel CALAT Coyote MIOR Creeping vole PEMA Deer mouse TADO Douglas' squirrel CEEL Elk MUER Ermine MAPE Fisher SCNI Fox squirrel MYTH Fringed myotis SPLA Golden-mantled ground squirrel CALU Gray wolf PEPA Great basin pocket mouse URAR Grizzly bear PHIN Heather vole LACI Hoary bat MACA Hoary marmot MUMU House mouse TAMI Least chipmunk MYLU Little brown myotis MYEV Long-eared myotis MYVO Long-legged myotis MILO Long-tailed vole MUFR Long-tailed weasel LYCA Lynx MAAM Marten SOCI Masked shrew MIPE Meadow vole MUVI Mink MIMO Montane vole ALAL Moose APRU Mountain beaver ORAM Mountain goat FECO Mountain lion ODHEH Mule deer ONZI Muskrat NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project GLSA Northern flying squirrel THTA Northern pocket gopher RANO Norway rat SYNU Nuttall's cottontail ZATR Pacific jumping mouse ANPA Pallid bat OCPR Pika ERDO Porcupine PRLO Raccoon VUVU Red fox TAHU Red squirrel LUCA River otter LANO Silver-haired bat MYLE Small-footed myotis LEAM Snowshoe hare EUMA Spotted bat MEMEP Striped skunk PLTOT Townsend's big-eared bat TATO Townsend's chipmunk SOVA Vagrant shrew SOPAL Water shrew SCGRI Western gray squirrel REME Western harvest mouse ZAPR Western jumping mouse CLCA Western red-backed vole ODVI White-tailed deer LETO White-tailed jack rabbit GUGU Wolverine MAFL Yellow-bellied marmot TAAM Yellow-pine chipmunk MYYU Yuma myotis Reptiles THSI Common garter snake PIME Gopher snake HYTO Night snake ELCO Northern alligator lizard CHPI Painted turtle COLCO Racer CHBO Rubber boa SCGRA Sagebrush lizard PHDO Short-horned lizard SCOC Western fence lizard CRVI Western rattlesnake EUSK Western skink NatureMapping 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Behavioral Aspects of Western Gray Squirrel Ecology
    Behavioral aspects of western gray squirrel ecology Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Cross, Stephen P. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 06:42:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565181 BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF WESTERN GRAY SQUIRREL ECOLOGY by Stephen Paul Cross A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of. the DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN ZOOLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 9 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by St e p h e n Paul Cross_______________________________ entitled B E H A V I O R A L A S P E C T S OF W E S T E R N G RAY__________ S Q U I R R E L E C O LOGY___________________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of D O C T O R OF P H I L O S O P H Y_____________________________ Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver Island Marmot
    Vancouver Island Marmot Restricted to the mountains of Vancouver Island, this endangered species is one of the rarest animals in North America. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks move between colonies can have a profound one basket” situation puts the Vancouver impact on the entire population. Island Marmot at considerable risk of Vancouver Island Marmots have disap- extinction. peared from about two-thirds of their his- Why are Vancouver Island torical natural range within the past several What is their status? Marmots at risk? decades and their numbers have declined by urveys of known and potential colony he Vancouver Island Marmot exists about 70 percent in the last 10 years. The sites from 1982 through 1986 resulted in nowhere in the world except Vancouver 1998 population consisted of fewer than 100 counts of up to 235 marmots. Counts Island.Low numbers and extremely local- individuals, making this one of the rarest Srepeated from 1994 through 1998 turned Tized distribution put them at risk. Human mammals in North America. Most of the up only 71 to 103 animals in exactly the same activities, bad weather, predators, disease or current population is concentrated on fewer areas. At least 12 colony extinctions have sheer bad luck could drive this unique animal than a dozen mountains in a small area of occurred since the 1980s. Only two new to extinction in the blink of an eye. about 150 square kilometres on southern colonies were identified during the 1990s. For thousands of years, Vancouver Island Vancouver Island. Estimating marmot numbers is an Marmots have been restricted to small Causes of marmot disappearances imprecise science since counts undoubtedly patches of suitable subalpine meadow from northern Vancouver Island remain underestimate true abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Squirrels
    Tree Squirrels When the public is polled regarding suburban and urban wildlife, tree squirrels generally rank first as problem makers. Residents complain about them nesting in homes and exploiting bird feeders. Interestingly, squirrels almost always rank first among preferred urban/suburban wildlife species. Such is the Figure 1. The Eastern gray squirrel is from the deciduous paradox they present: We want them and we don’t and mixed coniferous-deciduous forests of eastern North want them, depending on what they are doing at any America, and was introduced into city parks, campuses, given moment. and estates in Washington in the early 1900s. (Drawing by Elva Paulson) Although tree squirrels spend a considerable amount of time on the ground, unlike the related ground squirrels, they are more at home in trees. Washington is home to four species of native tree squirrels and two species of introduced tree squirrels. Native Washington Tree Squirrels The Douglas squirrel, or chickaree (Tamiasciurus douglasii) measures 10 to 14 inches in length, including its tail. Its upper parts are reddish-or brownish-gray, and its underparts are orange to yellowish. The Douglas squirrel is found in stands of fir, pine, cedar, and other conifers in the Cascade Mountains and western parts of Washington. The red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, Fig. 4) is about the same size as the Douglas squirrel and lives in coniferous forests and semi-open woods in northeast Washington. It is rusty-red on the upper part and white or grayish white on its underside. The Western gray squirrel (Sciurus griseus, Fig. 2) is the largest tree squirrel in Washington, ranging from 18 to 24 inches in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NOCA/NRTR—2012/593 ON THE COVER Hoary Marmot (Marmota caligata) Photograph courtesy of Roger Christophersen, North Cascades National Park Complex Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NOCA/NRTR—2012/593 Roger G. Christophersen National Park Service North Cascades National Park Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro-Woolley, WA 98284 June 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Tracks of Southeast Alaska
    COMMON TRACKS OF SOUTHEAST ALASKA A naturalist’s guide to our most “trackable” mammals and birds: where to find them and how to read their sign. Richard Carstensen 2013 for Discovery Southeast Alaska Dept of Fish and Game & Juneau Audubon Society TRACKING HABITATS muddy beaches stream yards & trails mudflat banks buildings keen’s mouse* red-backed vole* long-tailed vole* red squirrel beaver porcupine shrews* snowshoe hare* black-tailed deer domestic dog house cat black bear short-t. weasel* mink marten* river otter * Light-footed. Tracks usually found only on snow. ISBN: 978-0-9853474-0-6# 2013 text & illustrations © Discovery Southeast Printed by Alaska Litho Juneau, Alaska 1 CONTENTS DISCOVERY SOUTHEAST ........................................................... 2 ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ............................... 3 PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION ............................................ 5 TRACKING BASICS: LINGO, GAITS ......................................... 10 SCIENTIFIC NAMES ................................................................ 16 MAMMAL TRACK DESCRIPTIONS ............................................ 18 BIRD TRACK DESCRIPTIONS .................................................. 35 AMPHIBIANS .......................................................................... 40 OTHER MAMMALS ................................................................... 41 OTHER BIRDS ......................................................................... 45 RECOMMENDED FIELD
    [Show full text]
  • Thurston County Species List
    Washington Gap Analysis Project 202 Species Predicted or Breeding in: Thurston County CODE COMMON NAME Amphibians RACAT Bullfrog RHCAS Cascade torrent salamander ENES Ensatina AMMA Long-toed salamander AMGR Northwestern salamander RAPR Oregon spotted frog DITE Pacific giant salamander PSRE Pacific treefrog (Chorus frog) RAAU Red-legged frog TAGR Roughskin newt ASTR Tailed frog PLVA Van Dyke's salamander PLVE Western redback salamander BUBO Western toad Birds BOLE American bittern FUAM American coot COBR American crow CIME American dipper CATR American goldfinch FASP American kestrel TUMI American robin HALE Bald eagle COFA Band-tailed pigeon HIRU Barn swallow STVA Barred owl CEAL Belted kingfisher THBE Bewick's wren PAAT Black-capped chickadee PHME Black-headed grosbeak ELLE Black-shouldered kite (White-tailed kite DENI Black-throated gray warbler DEOB Blue grouse ANDI Blue-winged teal EUCY Brewer's blackbird CEAM Brown creeper MOAT Brown-headed cowbird PSMI Bushtit CACAL California quail BRCA Canada goose VISO Cassin's vireo (Solitary vireo) BOCE Cedar waxwing PARU Chestnut-backed chickadee SPPA Chipping sparrow NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project ANCY Cinnamon teal HIPY Cliff swallow TYAL Common barn-owl MERME Common merganser CHMI Common nighthawk COCOR Common raven GAGA Common snipe GETR Common yellowthroat ACCO Cooper's hawk JUHY Dark-eyed (Oregon) junco PIPU Downy woodpecker STVU European starling COVE Evening grosbeak PAIL Fox sparrow ANST Gadwall AQCH Golden eagle RESA Golden-crowned kinglet PECA Gray jay ARHE Great
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Comunication of Red Squirrels (Tamiasciurus Hudsonicus): Field Observations and Plaiback Experiments
    ACOUSTIC COMUNICATION OF RED SQUIRRELS (TAMIASCIURUS HUDSONICUS): FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND PLAIBACK EXPERIMENTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Stephen George Frost IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF EASTER OF SCIENCE IDEGREE GRANTED June 1978 i; TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Site Sound Level Measurements Playback Methods Laboratory Work RESULTS Vocalizations 11 Peep 11 Groan 13 Chuck 14 Trill 15 Scream 18 Chatter (air) 19 Whine 22 Multiple-Chuck 23 Growl 25 Chuckle 27 Buzz 28 Squeak 30 Non-vocal Acoustic Sounds 30 Drumming 30 Substrate Scratching and Rapid Ascent 31 Teeth Chattering 32 Tail Movements Accompanying Acoustical Communication 32 Vocal Behavior upon Release from Captivity 32 Sound Levels of Red Squirrel Sounds 33 Graded Nature of Red Squirrel Vocalizations 34 Playback Experiments 35 DISCUSSION 4o SUMMARY 57 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 58 LITERATURE CITED 59 APPENDIX A: FIGURES 61 APPENDIX B: TABLES 90 ii LIST OF FIGURES Page Fig. 1. Grid map of Itasca Biology Station study area. • • . 63 Fig. 2. Dye-marking number locations. • . • . • • • .. 65 Fig. 3. Sonograms of red squirrel vocalizations. .. 67 Fig. 4. Sonograms of red squirrel vocalizations. • . • • . 69 Fig. 5. Gradations of some red squirrel vocalizations. .. 71 Fig. 6. Gradations of some red squirrel vocalizations. .. 73 Fig. 7. Histograms of behavioral responses of the red squirrel to playbacks of a one minute alarm sequence of 127 Peep, twelve Chuck, and three Groan vocalizations. .. • • • • • • ... 75 Fig. 8. Histograms of behavioral responses of the red squirrel to playbacks of a Trill vocalization (preceded by five Peeps) three times during one minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Beavers
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Wildlife Damage for July 1994 Mountain Beavers Dan L. Campbell USDA-APHIS-Animal Damage Control, Olympia, WA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Campbell, Dan L., "Mountain Beavers" (1994). The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. 14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Dan L. Campbell Project Leader Olympia Field Station MOUNTAIN BEAVERS Denver Wildlife Research Center USDA-APHIS- Animal Damage Control Olympia, Washington 98512 Fig. 1. Mountain beaver, Aplodontia rufa Damage Prevention and Repellents Identification Control Methods 36% Big Game Repellent Powder has The mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa, been registered for mountain beaver Exclusion Fig. 1) is a medium-sized rodent in the in Washington and Oregon. family Aplodontiadae. There are no Use plastic mesh seedling protectors Toxicants other species in the family. Average on small tree seedlings. Wire mesh adults weigh 2.3 pounds (1,050 g) and cages are somewhat effective, but A pelleted strychnine alkaloid bait was range from 1.8 to 3.5 pounds (800 to large diameter cages are expensive registered in Oregon but may be 1,600 g). Average overall length is 13.5 and allow animals to enter them.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Ecological Factors That Affect the Population and Distribution of the Western Gray Squirrel in Northcentral Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1992 Studies of ecological factors that affect the population and distribution of the western gray squirrel in northcentral Oregon Susan Ann Foster Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, and the Environmental Monitoring Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Foster, Susan Ann, "Studies of ecological factors that affect the population and distribution of the western gray squirrel in northcentral Oregon" (1992). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2383. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2380 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE POPULATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE WESTERN GRAY SQUIRREL IN NORTHCENTRAL OREGON by SUSAN ANN FOSTER A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES AND RESOURCES: BIOLOGY Portland State University ©1992 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES: The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Susan Ann Foster presented January 10, 1992. Richard B. Forbes, Chair Robert O. Tinnin Richard R. Petersen Daniel M. Johnson David W. McClure Thomas Palm / APPROVED: Robert O. Tinnin, Chair, Department of Biology C. William Savery, Interim Vice Provost foi$2radraduate Studies and Research ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank the many people who have encouraged me in the process of this dissertation, especially Professors Richard Forbes, Robert Tinnin, and Richard Petersen.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Forests for Fish and Wildlife
    Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Managing Forests for Fish and Wildlife December 2002 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Leaflet Number 18 Forested areas can be managed with a wide variety of objectives, ranging from allowing natural processes to dictate long-term condition without active management of any kind, to maximizing production of wood products on the shortest rotations possible. The primary purpose of this document is to show how fish and wildlife habitat management can be effectively integrated into the management of forestlands that are subject to periodic timber harvest activities. For forestlands that are not managed for production of timber or other forest products, many of the principles U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station in this leaflet also apply. Introduction Succession of Forest Vegetation Forests in North America provide a wide variety of In order to meet both timber production and wildlife important natural resource functions. Although management goals, landowners and managers need commercial forests may be best known for production to understand how forest vegetation responds following of pulp, lumber, and other wood products, they also timber management, or silvicultural prescriptions, or supply valuable fish and wildlife habitat, recreational other disturbances. Forest vegetation typically opportunities, water quality protection, and other progresses from one plant community to another over natural resource benefits. In approximately two-thirds time. This forest succession can be described in four of the forest land (land that is at least 10% tree- stages: covered) in the United States, harvest of wood products plays an integral role in how these lands are managed. Sustainable forest management applies Fish and Wildlife Air and Water biological, economic, and social principles to forest Wood Products Habitat Quality regeneration, management, and conservation to meet the specific goals of landowners or managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Owl Workshop
    MONTANA OWL WORKSHOP APRIL 25–30, 2021 LEADER: DENVER HOLT LIST COMPILED BY: DENVER HOLT VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM MONTANA OWL WORKSHOP APRIL 25–30, 2021 By Denver Holt The winter of 2021 was relatively mild, with only one big storm in October and one cold snap in February. In fact, Great Horned Owls began nesting at the onset of this cold snap. Our female at the ORI field station began laying eggs and incubating. For almost a week the temperature dropped from about 20 degrees F to 10, then 0, then minus 10, minus 15, and eventually minus 28 degrees below zero. Meanwhile, the male roosted nearby and provided his mate with food while she incubated eggs. Eventually, the pair raised three young to fledging. Our group was able to see the entire family. By late February to early March, an influx of Short-eared Owls occurred. I had never seen anything like it. Hundreds of Short-eared Owls arrived in the valley. Flocks of 15, 20, 35, 50, and 70 were regularly reported by ranchers, birders, photographers, and others. And, in one evening I counted 90, of which 73 were roosting on fence posts and counted at one time. By mid-to-late March, however, except for Great Horned Owls, other owl species numbers dropped significantly. We found only one individual Long-eared Owl and zero nests in our Missoula study site. It’s been many, many years since we have not found a nest in Missoula.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Watching in the Pacific Northwest, Summer 2019 with Notes on Birding, Locations, Sounds, and Chasing Chipmunks
    Mammal watching in the Pacific Northwest, summer 2019 With notes on birding, locations, sounds, and chasing chipmunks Keywords: Sciuridae, trip report, mammals, birds, summer, July Daan Drukker 1 How to use this report For this report I’ve chosen not to do the classic chronological order, but instead, I’ve treated every mammal species I’ve seen in individual headers and added some charismatic species that I’ve missed. Further down I’ve made a list of hotspot birding areas that I’ve visited where the most interesting bird species that I’ve seen are treated. If you are visiting the Pacific Northwest, you’ll find information on where to look for mammals in this report and some additional info on taxonomy and identification. I’ve written it with a European perspective, but that shouldn’t be an issue. Birds are treated in detail for Mount Rainier and the Monterey area, including the California Condors of Big Sur. For other areas, I’ve mentioned the birds, but there must be other reports for more details. I did a non-hardcore type of birding, just looking at everything I came across and learning the North American species a bit, but not twitching everything that was remotely possible. That will be for another time. Every observation I made can be found on Observation.org, where the exact date, location and in some cases evidence photos and sound recordings are combined. These observations are revised by local admins, and if you see an alleged mistake, you can let the observer and admin know by clicking on one of the “Contact” options in the upper right panel.
    [Show full text]