Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 116/Monday, June 17, 2019/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 116/Monday, June 17, 2019/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices 28019 missiles in flight, evaluates potential genuine specific force. The EGI is designated targets for pilot training, but false alarms, declares validity of threat, Selective Available Anti-Spoofing it does not have a warhead or and selects appropriate Infrared Module (SAASM) based on navigation propulsion section and cannot be Countermeasures (IRCM). It includes platform that combines an inertia sensor launched. Electro Optical Missile Sensors, for position information and is 12. If a technologically advanced Electronic Control Unit (ECU), UNCLASSIFIED. The GPS crypto adversary were to obtain knowledge of Sequencer, and the Improved variables need the highest GPS accuracy the specific hardware and software Countermeasures Dispenser (ICMD) that and are classified up to SECRET. elements, the information could be used consists of the Dispenser Assembly and 8. The AGM-114R Hellfire missile is to develop countermeasures that might the Payload Module. The ICMD precision strike, Semi-Active Laser reduce weapon system effectiveness or dispenses decoy expendable objects (SAL) guided missile and is the be used in the development of a system (chaff, flares, etc.) to confuse threat principle air to ground weapon for the with similar or advanced capabilities. radar devices. In-country repair AH-64 Apache. The SAL Hellfire 13. A determination has been made capability will not be provided. Reverse missile is guided by laser energy that Qatar can provide substantially the engineering is not a major concern. The reflected off the target. It has three same degree of protection for the hardware is UNCLASSIFIED when the warhead variants: a dual warhead, sensitive technology being released as software is not loaded. The software is shape-charge, high explosive anti-tank the U.S. Government. This sale is classified SECRET. capability for armored targets, a blast necessary in furtherance of the U.S. 5. The AN/APR-39, Radar Signal fragmentation warhead for urban patrol foreign policy and national security boat and other soft targets and metal Detecting Set is designed to operate on objectives outlined in the Policy rotary wing and slow moving fixed wing augmented charge warhead for urban Justification. aircraft to detect, categorize, and structures. AGM-114R allows selection prioritize pulse radio frequency emitter of warhead effects corresponding to a 14. All defense articles and services illuminating the host platform to allow specific target type. Hardware for the listed in this transmittal are authorized appropriate countermeasures. This is AGM-114R is UNCLASSIFIED. for release and export to the the 1553 data bus compatible 9. The highest level for release of the Government of Qatar. configuration. In-country repair AGM-114R Hellfire III missile is Secret, [FR Doc. 2019–12665 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am] capability will not be provided. based upon the software. The highest BILLING CODE 5001–06–P Hardware is UNCLASSIFIED when the level of classified information that could software is not loaded. The software is be disclosed by a proposed sale or by CONFIDENTIAL. The system can be testing of the end item is SECRET; the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE programmed with threat data provided highest level that must be disclosed for by the purchasing country. production, maintenance, or training is Office of the Secretary 6. The AN/AVR-2B Laser Detecting CONFIDENTIAL. Reverse engineering Set is a passive laser warning system could reveal confidential information. [Transmittal No. 18–20] that receives processes, and displays Vulnerability data, countermeasures, threat information resulting from vulnerability/susceptibility analyses, Arms Sales Notification aircraft illumination by laser and threat definitions are classified AGENCY: designators, rangefinders, and SECRET or CONFIDENTIAL. Defense Security Cooperation beamrider missile guidance systems. 10. The M211-flare is a Agency, Department of Defense. The AN/AVR-2B uses the existing AN/ countermeasure decoy in a 1’’ x 1’’ x 8’’ ACTION: Arms sales notice. APR-39A/D interface for control status form factor in an aluminum case and crew warning. The threat cartridge. It consists of case, piston, SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is information is processed by the AN/ special material payload foils, and end publishing the unclassified text of an APR-39 RSDS, displayed on the aircraft cap. The special material is a arms sales notification. multi-function display and announced pyrophoric metal (iron) foil that reacts FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: by the AN/APR-39 RSDS via the aircraft with oxygen to generate infrared energy. Karma Job at [email protected] Inter Communication System. In- The M211 decoys are dispersed from an or (703) 697–8976. country repair capability will not be aircraft to be used as a decoy in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This provided. Reverse engineering is not a combination with the currently fielded 36(b)(1) arms sales notification is major concern. The hardware is M206 and M212 countermeasure flares published to fulfill the requirements of classified CONFIDENTIAL; releasable to protect against advanced air-to-air section 155 of Public Law 104–164 technical manuals for operation and and surface-to-air missile threats. The dated July 21, 1996. The following is a maintenance are classified SECRET. hardware is Unclassified and releasable copy of a letter to the Speaker of the 7. Embedded Global Positioning technical manuals for operation and House of Representatives, Transmittal System (GPS)/Inertial Navigation maintenance are classified SECRET. 18–20 with attached Policy Justification System (INS). GPS/INS utilize GPS 11. The M36E9 Captive Air Training and Sensitivity of Technology. satellite signals to correct or calibrate a Missile (CATM) is a Hellfire training solution from an INS. Inertial navigation missile (Non-NATO) that consists of a Dated: June 11, 2019. systems usually can provide an accurate functional guidance section coupled to Aaron T. Siegel, solution only for short duration. The an inert missile bus. The missile has an Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison INS accelerometers produce an operational semi-active laser seeker that Officer, Department of Defense. unknown bias signal that appears as a can search for and lock-on to laser BILLING CODE 5001–06–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Jun 14, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 28020 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices BILLING CODE 5001–06–C Twenty (20) AGM-84 Block II Harpoon Seventy (70) KMU-557 GBU-31 Tail Kits Transmittal No. 18-20 Missiles (GBU-31 JDAM, GBU-56 JDAM) Two (2) ATM-84L-1 Block II Harpoon One hundred twenty (120) KMU-572 Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Missiles Tail Kits (GBU-38, -54) Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the Forty (40) AGM-154 Joint Standoff One hundred (100) DSU-38 Proximity Arms Export Control Act, as amended Weapon (JSOW) All-Up-Rounds Sensors (GBU-54) (i) Prospective Purchaser: Government Fifty (50) AGM-88B High-Speed Anti- Four hundred sixty-two (462) MK-82 or of Bahrain Radiation Missiles (HARM) BLU-111 500 lb Bomb Bodies (ii) Total Estimated Value: Four (4) AGM-88 HARM Training (Supporting GBU-12, GBU-38, GBU- Missiles 49, GBU-54) Major Defense Equipment * $400 million Two hundred ten (210) BLU-109/BLU- Other .................................... $350 million One hundred (100) GBU-39 250 lb Small Diameter Bomb (SDB-1) All-Up- 117 or MK-84 2000 lb Bomb Bodies TOTAL .............................. $750 million Rounds (Supporting GBU-10, GBU-31, GBU- Four hundred (400) MAU-209 C/B 50, GBU-56) (iii) Description and Quantity or Computer Control Groups (GBU-10, Ten (10) Practice BLU-109/BLU-117 Quantities of Articles or Services under -12) Six hundred seventy (670) FMU-152 Consideration for Purchase: Eighty (80) MAU-210 Enhanced Fuses (supporting GBU-10, -12,-31, Major Defense Equipment (MDE): Computer Control Groups (GBU-49, -38, -49, -50, -54, & -56) Thirty-two (32) AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM -50) Non-MDE: Also included are LAU-118 Missiles Three hundred forty (340) MXU-650 Air launchers; BRU-61 racks; general One (1) AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM Foil Group (GBU-12, -49) purpose Air Foil Groups; tactical Guidance Section One hundred forty (140) MXU-651 Air training rounds; combat arms training Thirty-two (32) AIM-9X Missiles Foil Groups (GBU-10, -50) and Maintenance Assets; nose support VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Jun 14, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES EN17JN19.000</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices 28021 cups; Swivel/Link attachments; DSU- (Supporting GBU-10, GBU-31, GBU-50, two (2) additional U.S. Government 38/40/42 proximity sensors; Repair and GBU-56); ten (10) practice BLU-109/ representatives to Bahrain. Return services; studies and surveys; BLU-117; six hundred seventy (670) There will be no adverse impact on weapons system support and test FMU-152 fuses (supporting GBU-10, U.S. defense readiness as a result of this equipment; publications and technical -12, -31, -38; -49, -50, -54, & -56). Also proposed sale. documentation; Alternate Mission included are LAU-118 launchers; BRU- Transmittal No. 18–20 Equipment (AME); mission system 61 racks; general purpose Air Foil spares and munitions spare parts; Groups; tactical training rounds; combat Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of software maintenance and support; arms training and Maintenance Assets; Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the missile support and test equipment; nose support cups; Swivel/Link Arms Export Control Act common munitions bit/reprogramming attachments; DSU-38/40/42 proximity Annex equipment; missile and munitions sensors; Repair and Return services; Item No. vii containers; personnel training and studies and surveys; weapons system training equipment; site surveys; U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California TECHNICAL REPORT “SEA ARCHER” Distributed Aviation Platform by Faculty Members Charles Calvano David Byers Robert Harney Fotis Papoulias John Ciezki Robert Ashton Student Members LT Joe Keller, USN LCDR Rabon Cooke, USN CDR(sel) James Ivey, USN LT Brad Stallings, USN LT Antonios Dalakos, Helenic Navy LT Scot Searles, USN LTjg Orhan Okan, Turkish Navy LTjg Mersin Gokce, Turkish Navy LT Ryan Kuchler, USN LT Pete Lashomb, USN Ivan Ng, Singapore December 2001 Approved for public release, distribution unlimited REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2001 Technical Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS “Sea Archer” Distributed Aviation Platform 6. AUTHOR(S) Charles Calvano, Robert Harney, David Byers, Fotis Papoulias, John Ciezki, LT Joe Keller, LCDR Rabon Cooke, CDR (sel) James Ivey, LT Brad Stallings, LT Scot Searles, LT Ryan Kuchler, Ivan Ng, LTjg Orhan Okan, LTjg Mersin Gokce, LT Antonios Dalakos, LT Pete Lashomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020
    80060 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices Defense System Launcher political stability, military balance, 2. The highest level of classification of Transporter Units, twenty-five (25) economic and progress in the region. defense articles, components, and radar trucks, spare and repair parts, This proposed sale will improve the services included in this potential sale support and test equipment, recipient’s capability to meet current is CONFIDENTIAL. publications and technical and future threats by providing a 3. If a technologically advanced documentation, personnel training flexible solution to augment existing adversary were to obtain knowledge of and training equipment, U.S. surface and air defenses. The recipient the hardware and software elements, the Government and contractor will be able to employ a highly reliable information could be used to develop representatives’ technical and effective system to counter or deter countermeasures or equivalent systems, assistance, engineering and logistics maritime aggressions, coastal blockades, which might reduce system support services, and other related and amphibious assaults. This effectiveness or be used in the elements of logistics support. capability will easily integrate into development of a system with similar or (iv) Military Department: Navy (TW-P- existing force infrastructure. The advanced capabilities. LHX) recipient will have no difficulty 4. A determination has been made (v) Prior Related Cases, if any: TW-P- absorbing these systems into its armed that the recipient can provide LGV, TW-P-LGN, TW-P-LGL forces. substantially the same degree of (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, The proposed sale of this equipment protection for the sensitive technology Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None and support will not alter the basic (vii) Sensitivity of Technology being released as the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac by Susan H.H
    Gallery of USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac By Susan H.H. Young Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2007. Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying missions over intercontinental range, then penetrating enemy defenses with the largest pay- load of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 67. Unit Location: Dyess AFB, Tex., Ellsworth AFB, S.D., Edwards AFB, Calif. Contractor: Boeing; AIL Systems; General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbo- fans, each 30,780 lb thrust. B-1B Lancer (Richard VanderMeulen) Accommodation: four, pilot, copilot, and two systems officers (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. B-1B. Initiated in 1981, the first production model of Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Dimensions: span spread 137 ft, swept aft 79 ft, length the improved variant B-1 flew in October 1984. USAF Contractor: Northrop Grumman; Boeing; Vought. 146 ft, height 34 ft. produced a total of 100. The active B-1B inventory was Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbo- Weights: empty equipped 192,000 lb, max operating reduced to 67 aircraft (from the remaining 92) with con- fans, each 17,300 lb thrust. weight 477,000 lb. solidation to two main operating bases within Air Combat Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Raytheon Annual Report
    Focused on the Customer 2004 annual report Board of Directors ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . . . . . , .** Chairman and CEO Institute Professor Chairman and Retired President and Chairman and Raytheon Company Massachusetts Institute of Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Technology American Standard Data General Corporation Cypress International Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Companies, Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Retired General, U.S. Army . . ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . Former Commander-in- International Business and President Emeritus . * Retired President and Chief of the United Nations Aviation Attorney California Institute of of Counsel Chief Executive Officer Command, Republic of ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Technology Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Luminent, Inc. Korea/United States Wharton Garrison ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Combined Forces/United - ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . States Forces Korea Retired Chairman and . Partner Chief Executive Officer Chairman Stuntz, Davis Staffier, P.C. *Lead Director Cabot Industrial Trust EMC Corporation **Retiring effective “2004 was a strong year with May 4, 2005 record orders of $25.7 billion; sales Leadership Team of $20.2 billion – a 12% increase Clockwise from upper left: Rebecca R. Rhoads, Jay B. Stephens, Donald M. Ronchi, Charles E. Franklin, Keith J. Peden, John D. Harris II, Edward S. Pliner, Thomas M. Culligan,
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded April 22, 2006
    SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Sustainability Manual
    Energy Usage, GHG Reduction, Effi ciency and Load Management Manual Brewers Association Energy Usage, GHG Reduction, Effi ciency and Load Management Manual Energy Usage, GHG Reduction, Effi ciency and Load Management Manual 1 2 BrewersAssociation.org table of contents Acknowledgements . .4 Best Practices - Kitchen Area . 39 Introduction . .5 Best Practices - Dining Room . 40 Section 1: Sector Profi le – Energy Use in Breweries . .6 Best Practices - Parking Lot/Outdoor Seating . 40 1.1 Overview of Current Energy Use/Greenhouse Gas 3.5 Concerts and Events . 41 Performance and Trends . 6 Section 4: Onsite Renewable Energy . .42 1.2 Regulatory Drivers . 7 4.1 Technology and Use Application Review . 43 1.3 Non-Regulatory Drivers – Image/brand, community ties. 7 4.2 Fuel Availability . 43 1.4 Risks and Opportunities – Energy/Greenhouse 4.3 Fuel Supply and Cost . 43 Gas Reduction . 8 4.4 Size Selection and Infrastructure Impacts. 44 Section 2: Data Management . .9 4.5 Cost and Savings Review . 44 2.1 Data Collection . 9 4.6 Renewable Energy Certifi cates . 45 2.2 Ensuring accuracy . 11 Section 5: Brewery Case Studies . .46 2.3 Benchmarking – Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) . 11 5.1 Usage and Reduction . 46 2.4 Guidelines for Setting Measureable Goals and Objectives . .13 Boulevard Brewing Company – Kansas City, Missouri . 46 Section 3: Usage & Reduction Best Practices . .15 Deschutes Brewery – Bend, Oregon . 46 3.1 Brewing . 16 Harpoon Brewery – Boston, Massachusetts . 47 Best Practices – CO2 Recovery Systems . 16 New Belgium Brewing Company – Fort Collins, Colorado . 47 3.2 Packaging. 18 Sierra Nevada Brewing Company – Chico, California . 47 Best Practices - Variable Speed Drives .
    [Show full text]
  • Usafalmanac ■ Gallery of USAF Weapons
    USAFAlmanac ■ Gallery of USAF Weapons By Susan H.H. Young The B-1B’s conventional capability is being significantly enhanced by the ongoing Conventional Mission Upgrade Program (CMUP). This gives the B-1B greater lethality and survivability through the integration of precision and standoff weapons and a robust ECM suite. CMUP will include GPS receivers, a MIL-STD-1760 weapon interface, secure radios, and improved computers to support precision weapons, initially the JDAM, followed by the Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) and the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM). The Defensive System Upgrade Program will improve aircrew situational awareness and jamming capability. B-2 Spirit Brief: Stealthy, long-range, multirole bomber that can deliver conventional and nuclear munitions anywhere on the globe by flying through previously impenetrable defenses. Function: Long-range heavy bomber. Operator: ACC. First Flight: July 17, 1989. Delivered: Dec. 17, 1993–present. B-1B Lancer (Ted Carlson) IOC: April 1997, Whiteman AFB, Mo. Production: 21 planned. Inventory: 21. Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Contractor: Northrop Grumman, with Boeing, LTV, and General Electric as principal subcontractors. Bombers Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbo fans, each 17,300 lb thrust. B-1 Lancer Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Brief: A long-range multirole bomber capable of flying on zero/zero ejection seats. missions over intercontinental range without refueling, Dimensions: span 172 ft, length 69 ft, height 17 ft. then penetrating enemy defenses with a heavy load Weight: empty 150,000–160,000 lb, gross 350,000 lb. of ordnance. Ceiling: 50,000 ft. Function: Long-range conventional bomber.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Billing Code 5001-06 DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE
    This document is scheduled to be published in the 1 Federal Register on 12/31/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-31420, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 5001-06 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary (Transmittal Nos. 12-66) 36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated July 21, 1996. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 12-66 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology. Dated: December 26, 2012. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 2 3 Transmittal No. 12-66 Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (i) Prospective Purchaser: The Sultanate of Oman (ii) Total Estimated Value: Major Defense Equipment* $ 82 million Other $ 35 million TOTAL $ 117 million (iii) Description and Quantity or Quantities of Articles or Services under Consideration for Purchase: 27 AIM-120C-7 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM), 162 GBU-12 PAVEWAY II 500-lb Laser Guided Bombs, 162 FMU-152 bomb fuzes, 150 BLU-111B/B 500- lb Conical Fin General Purpose Bombs (Freefall Tail), 60 BLU-111B/B 500-lb Retarded Fin General Purpose Bombs (Ballute Tail), and 32 CBU- 105 Wind Corrected Munitions Dispensers (WCMD).
    [Show full text]
  • Raytheon 2009 Annual Report 2010 Board of Directors
    Raytheon 2009 Annual Report 2010 Board of Directors William H. Swanson Stephen J. Hadley Ronald L. Skates Chairman and Principal Retired President and Chief Executive Officer The RiceHadley Group, LLC Chief Executive Officer Raytheon Company Data General Corporation Frederic M. Poses Vernon E. Clark Retired Chairman and William R. Spivey Admiral Chief Executive Officer Retired President and Chief of Naval Operations Trane, Inc. Chief Executive Officer U.S. Navy (Ret.) Luminent, Inc. Michael C. Ruettgers* John M. Deutch Retired Chairman and Linda G. Stuntz Institute Professor Chief Executive Officer Partner Massachusetts Institute EMC Corporation Stuntz, Davis & Staffier, P.C. of Technology In an environment full of challenges, Raytheon delivered *Lead Director another year of outstanding performance in 2009. Staying true to our vision and values, we executed at a world- 2010 Leadership Team class level through 8,000 programs and 15,000 contracts, William H. Swanson Jon C. Jones* Daniel L. Smith bringing Mission Assurance to our customers and solid Chairman and President President Chief Executive Officer Space and Airborne Systems Integrated Defense Systems Raytheon Company growth to our shareholders. Our domain knowledge, Taylor W. Lawrence, Ph.D. Jay B. Stephens Thomas M. Culligan President Senior Vice President technological leadership and culture of innovation con- Senior Vice President Missile Systems General Counsel and Secretary Business Development, RII Raytheon Company tinue to create expanding opportunities globally. Our Raytheon Company Keith J. Peden Senior Vice President David C. Wajsgras 75,000 customer-focused employees continue to bring Lynn A. Dugle Human Resources Senior Vice President and President Raytheon Company Chief Financial Officer Intelligence and Raytheon Company forth new solutions at an accelerating pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons
    CHILD POLICY This PDF document was made available CIVIL JUSTICE from www.rand.org as a public service of EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE Jump down to document6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit POPULATION AND AGING research organization providing PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY objective analysis and effective SUBSTANCE ABUSE solutions that address the challenges TERRORISM AND facing the public and private sectors HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND around the world. INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons Bernard Fox, Michael Boito, John C.Graser, Obaid Younossi Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release, distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]