DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Report NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California TECHNICAL REPORT “SEA ARCHER” Distributed Aviation Platform by Faculty Members Charles Calvano David Byers Robert Harney Fotis Papoulias John Ciezki Robert Ashton Student Members LT Joe Keller, USN LCDR Rabon Cooke, USN CDR(sel) James Ivey, USN LT Brad Stallings, USN LT Antonios Dalakos, Helenic Navy LT Scot Searles, USN LTjg Orhan Okan, Turkish Navy LTjg Mersin Gokce, Turkish Navy LT Ryan Kuchler, USN LT Pete Lashomb, USN Ivan Ng, Singapore December 2001 Approved for public release, distribution unlimited REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2001 Technical Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS “Sea Archer” Distributed Aviation Platform 6. AUTHOR(S) Charles Calvano, Robert Harney, David Byers, Fotis Papoulias, John Ciezki, LT Joe Keller, LCDR Rabon Cooke, CDR (sel) James Ivey, LT Brad Stallings, LT Scot Searles, LT Ryan Kuchler, Ivan Ng, LTjg Orhan Okan, LTjg Mersin Gokce, LT Antonios Dalakos, LT Pete Lashomb. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING / MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Currently, no system exists that provides a sea-based distributed aviation platform capability. The emergence of Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAVs) / Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs), the continued U.S. Navy focus on the littorals, the desire for force distribution, the need for operational cost reductions, and the advent of Network Centric Warfare (NCW) all combine to support the requirement to re-evaluate how littoral operations will be conducted in the future. Given this background, a bottom-up design of a ship supporting a primarily UAV / UCAV air wing in a low to medium threat environment, is of significant interest. SEA ARCHER meets this interest. This report outlines a design that meets the future needs for distributed aviation with a high-speed, highly automated platform. Large gains in reduced manning through automated systems for both operation and damage control help meet the demanding needs for the future of the Navy at reduced operational costs. The report will outline both the Mission Needs Statement (MNS) and Operational Requirements Document (ORD) for the ship that was developed. The analysis of alternatives that was conducted to determine relative size requirements for the ships is presented in the next section. The concept design that resulted as a result of the Total Ship Systems Engineering process is then presented. Finally, a detailed look at the analysis and trade studies that were conducted is presented in order to show the more detailed analysis that was conducted in designing the ship. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Ship Design, Total Ship Systems Engineering, SEA ARCHER, Distributed 15. NUMBER OF Aviation, Littoral Warfare ship PAGES 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii This report outlines the results of a two quarter Total Ship Systems Engineering (TSSE) Capstone design project undertaken by the students at the Naval Postgraduate School. The project was under the direction of Professors C.N. Calvano and R.Harney. The design team consisted of: LT Joe Keller, USN; LCDR Rabon Cooke, USN; CDR (sel) James Ivey, USN; LT Brad Stallings, USN; LT Scot Searles, USN; LT Ryan Kuchler, USN; Ivan Ng, Singapore Defense Science and Technology Agency; LTjg Orhan Okan, Turkish Navy; LTjg Mersin Gokce, Turkish Navy; LT Antonios Dalakos, Helenic Navy; LT Pete Lashomb, USN. ABSTRACT Currently, no system exists that provides a sea-based distributed aviation platform capability. The emergence of Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAVs) / Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs), the continued U.S. Navy focus on the littorals, the desire for force distribution, the need for operational cost reductions, and the advent of Network Centric Warfare (NCW) all combine to support the requirement to re-evaluate how littoral operations will be conducted in the future. Given this background, a bottom-up design of a ship supporting a primarily UAV / UCAV air wing in a low to medium threat environment, is of significant interest. SEA ARCHER meets this interest. This report outlines a design that meets the future needs for distributed aviation with a high-speed, highly automated platform. Large gains in reduced manning through automated systems for both operation and damage control help meet the demanding needs for the future of the Navy at reduced operational costs. The report will outline both the Mission Needs Statement (MNS) and Operational Requirements Document (ORD) for the ship that was developed. The analysis of alternatives that was conducted to determine relative size requirements for the ships is presented in the next section. The concept design that resulted as a result of the Total Ship Systems Engineering process is then presented. Finally, a detailed look at the analysis and trade studies that were conducted is presented in order to show the more detailed analysis that was conducted in designing the ship. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv FACULTY COMMENTS By Professors C. N. Calvano, and R. C. Harney, NPS TSSE PROGRAM A purpose of the TSSE capstone design project is to give experience in the design process as applied to a large, complex system, using a Navy ship as the system of interest. An additional major goal is to require the students to develop and exercise the leadership and cooperative skills needed to perform a complex task as a team. It is also hoped that the design produced will be interesting, innovative and, possibly, spur discussion and thought in Navy and industry circles. The program is made up of students enrolled in three curricula: Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Combat Systems. The faculty strives to ensure that all design projects provide an opportunity for students from each of these curricula to apply what they have learned in their individual domains while participating in a wider-scope team design. The 2001 capstone design project was the 10th since the program’s inception, but the first to be run within a broader, campus-wide collaborative environment. The project grew out of a Naval War College initiative exploring a concept called CORSAIR, a small aviation-capable ship carrying STOVL JSFs for littoral operations. CORSAIR was envisioned as contributing to a USN capability to defeat an adversary’s access-denial capability and, in this role, would essentially be providing air cover for small littoral combatants, such as the SEA LANCE, which was the subject of the 2000 TSSE capstone project, a response to another NWDC initiative. CAMPUS-WIDE COLLABORATIVE PROJECT The lead in the operational aspects of this collaborative project went to students in the Systems Engineering and Integration curriculum. They were tasked to explore the concept operationally, and their analysis resulted in a FORCE-level approach that had the following salient features: v • The FORCE was intended for operation in low to moderate threat areas in the littorals (where it could relieve or substitute for a CVBG that was needed elsewhere where the threat was high). • Unmanned air vehicles (UCAVs and UAVs), were employed exclusively to permit exploration of their utility. The air vehicles provide a primarily reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition (RSTA) mission capability, though it was seen as useful to give the UCAVs the ability to carry a limited amount of ordnance. • The aviation capability of the force would be widely distributed across a number of platforms (notionally quantified as eight). The loss or incapacitation of any platform would not result in the loss of a major part of the aviation capability. • Because strike capability was not a major part of the force’s purpose and because the aviation capability of the FORCE was the capability of interest, individual platforms would not conduct high-tempo air ops (if several aircraft needed to be launched or recovered in a short period of time, several of the eight platforms would share the task). • Survivability of the FORCE’s capability is the survivability characteristic of interest. The individual platforms would be looked upon as “combat consumable”. (This, of course, played a big part in the thinking that minimum manning was needed. And, frankly, the idea of considering individual platforms to be “combat consumable” arose when it was hoped the aviation ships would be less than 8000 MT; our design showed that size to be unachievable, given the requirements.) • The force would be capable of significantly higher speed than current forces, with exploration of a 60 knot maximum speed capability as a prime feature of interest. • The force would consist of 8 aviation platforms carrying a combination of UCAVs, UAVs and, in very small numbers, helos.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acoustic Sound Level and Sound Intensity Measurements
    Acoustic Sound Level and Sound Intensity Measurements SINT Technology s.r.l. Tel: +39.055.8826302 · Fax: +39.055.8826303 · [email protected] · www.sintechnology.com SINT Technology s.r.l. Tel: +39.055.8826302 · Fax: +39.055.8826303 · [email protected] · www.sintechnology.com Acoustic Sound Level and Sound Intensity Measurements Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure and sound intensity method Noise is a critical parameter for health and safety and noise exposure must be kept under control. Noise is characteristic of the environment in which we live and is chiefly determined by the presence of man. Whether in a natural environment, a civil or industrial installation, noise requires the intervention of man for it to be kept under control and to limit the impact of noise on daily activities. SINT Technology can provide a wide range of acoustics services, from reliable measurements to analysis of results and comparison with the limits laid down by the law and international standards, to designing solutions to reduce noise. Our services are characterised by: SINT Technology operates in va- the professionalism guaranteed by highly skilled engineering techni- rious areas cians OIL & GAS dynamism and flexibility Energy willingness to perform testing on the customer's plant in all parts of the Rail world Automotive detailed reporting in accordance with the customer's requirements and Civil SINT Technology s.r.l. Tel: +39.055.8826302 · Fax: +39.055.8826303 · [email protected] · www.sintechnology.com Acoustic Sound Level and Sound Intensity Measurements Measurement and analysis of noise in industry and in the workplace The risk of noise hazards depends primarily on the sound power level present in the workplace and on the length of daily exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1981, No.45
    www.ukrweekly.com ;?C свОБОДАJLSVOBODA І І і о "в УКРДШСШИИ щоліннмк ^Щ^У UKKAINIAHOAIIV PUBLISHEDrainia BY THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATIOnN INC . A FRATERNAWeekL NON-PROFIT ASSOCIATION l ї Ш Ute 25 cents voi LXXXVIII No. 45 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8, i98i Reagan administration Five years later announces appointment for rights post The Ukrainian Helsinki Group: WASHINGTON - After months of the struggle continues delay, the Reagan administration an– nounced on October 30 that it is no– When the leaders of 35 states gathered in Helsinki in minating Elliot Abrams, a neo-conser– August 1975 signed the Final Act of the Conference on vative Democrat and former Senate Security and Cooperation in Europe, few could aide, to be assistant secretary of state for have foreseen the impact the agreement would have in human rights and humanitarian affairs, the Soviet Union. While the accords granted the Soviets reported The New York Times. de jure recognition of post-World War ll boundaries, they The 33-year-old lawyer, who pre– also extracted some acquiescence to provisions viously worked as special counsel to guaranteeing human rights and freedom, guarantees Sen. Henry Jackson of Washington and that already existed in the Soviet Constitution and Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New countless international covenants. York, joined the administration last At the time, the human-rights provisions seemed January as assistant secretary of state unenforceable, a mere formality, a peripheral issue for international organization affairs. agreed to by a regime with no intention of carrying in announcing the nomination, Presi– them through. dent Ronald Reagan stated that hu– But just over one year later, on November 9,1976,10 man-rights considerations are an im– courageous Ukrainian intellectuals in Kiev moat of portant part of foreign policy, the Times them former political prisoners, formed the Ukrainian said.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Efficiency and Controlling Noise from Louvered Muffler
    International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X THERMAL EFFICIENCY AND CONTROLLING NOISE FROM LOUVERED MUFFLER Shaik.Peerulla Basha1, Dr.s.shakeel Ahamed,MTech,Phd,FIE,MISTE2. 1PG Student, Dept. of Mechanical engineering, Annamacharya institute of technology and sciences, Kadapa, AP, India. 2 professor,Dept. of Mechanical engineering Annamacharya institute of technology and sciences, Kadapa, AP, India ABSTRACT- The muffler is designed to not fiberglass insulation and/or resonating chambers only reduce the noise of the engine, but to reduce harmonically tuned to cause destructive interference back pressure as well. A good muffler can thus wherein opposite sound waves cancel each other improve engine performance. The muffler is out. An unavoidable side effect of muffler use is an engineered as an acoustic soundproofing device increase of back pressure which decreases engine designed to reduce the loudness of the sound efficiency. This is because the engine exhaust must pressure created by the engine by way of acoustic share the same complex exit pathway built inside the quieting. muffler as the sound pressure that the muffler is Louvered mufflers reduce the flow of engine designed to mitigate. Some vehicle owners remove noise with the use of louvers that trap some of the or install an aftermarket muffler when engine tuning sound. Perforated bullet mufflers have a section in order to increase power output or reduce fuel that is perforated to allow sound waves to consumption because of economic or environmental disperse, although it is not very effective in concerns, recreational pursuits such as motorsport reducing engine noise. and hypermiling and/or for personal aesthetic An unavoidable side effect of muffler use is an acoustical preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020
    80060 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices Defense System Launcher political stability, military balance, 2. The highest level of classification of Transporter Units, twenty-five (25) economic and progress in the region. defense articles, components, and radar trucks, spare and repair parts, This proposed sale will improve the services included in this potential sale support and test equipment, recipient’s capability to meet current is CONFIDENTIAL. publications and technical and future threats by providing a 3. If a technologically advanced documentation, personnel training flexible solution to augment existing adversary were to obtain knowledge of and training equipment, U.S. surface and air defenses. The recipient the hardware and software elements, the Government and contractor will be able to employ a highly reliable information could be used to develop representatives’ technical and effective system to counter or deter countermeasures or equivalent systems, assistance, engineering and logistics maritime aggressions, coastal blockades, which might reduce system support services, and other related and amphibious assaults. This effectiveness or be used in the elements of logistics support. capability will easily integrate into development of a system with similar or (iv) Military Department: Navy (TW-P- existing force infrastructure. The advanced capabilities. LHX) recipient will have no difficulty 4. A determination has been made (v) Prior Related Cases, if any: TW-P- absorbing these systems into its armed that the recipient can provide LGV, TW-P-LGN, TW-P-LGL forces. substantially the same degree of (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, The proposed sale of this equipment protection for the sensitive technology Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None and support will not alter the basic (vii) Sensitivity of Technology being released as the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • 5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721
    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) P. Faltstrom, Ed. Request for Comments: 5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721 The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) Abstract This document specifies rules for deciding whether a code point, considered in isolation or in context, is a candidate for inclusion in an Internationalized Domain Name (IDN). It is part of the specification of Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications 2008 (IDNA2008). Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5892. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrillische Schrift Für Den Computer
    Hanna-Chris Gast Kyrillische Schrift für den Computer Benennung der Buchstaben, Vergleich der Transkriptionen in Bibliotheken und Standesämtern, Auflistung der Unicodes sowie Tastaturbelegung für Windows XP Inhalt Seite Vorwort ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Kyrillische Schriftzeichen mit Benennung................................................................................... 3 1.1 Die Buchstaben im Russischen mit Schreibschrift und Aussprache.................................. 3 1.2 Kyrillische Schriftzeichen anderer slawischer Sprachen.................................................... 9 1.3 Veraltete kyrillische Schriftzeichen .................................................................................... 10 1.4 Die gebräuchlichen Sonderzeichen ..................................................................................... 11 2 Transliterationen und Transkriptionen (Umschriften) .......................................................... 13 2.1 Begriffe zum Thema Transkription/Transliteration/Umschrift ...................................... 13 2.2 Normen und Vorschriften für Bibliotheken und Standesämter....................................... 15 2.3 Tabellarische Übersicht der Umschriften aus dem Russischen ....................................... 21 2.4 Transliterationen veralteter kyrillischer Buchstaben ....................................................... 25 2.5 Transliterationen bei anderen slawischen
    [Show full text]
  • Structure–Function Analysis of the Tssl Cytoplasmic Domain Reveals a New Interaction Between the Type VI Secretion Baseplate A
    Structure–Function Analysis of the TssL Cytoplasmic Domain Reveals a New Interaction between the Type VI Secretion Baseplate and Membrane Complexes Abdelrahim Zoued, Chloé Cassaro, Eric Durand, Badreddine Douzi, Alexandre España, Christian Cambillau, Laure Journet, E. Cascales To cite this version: Abdelrahim Zoued, Chloé Cassaro, Eric Durand, Badreddine Douzi, Alexandre España, et al.. Structure–Function Analysis of the TssL Cytoplasmic Domain Reveals a New Interaction between the Type VI Secretion Baseplate and Membrane Complexes. Journal of Molecular Biology, Elsevier, 2016, 428 (22), pp.4413 - 4423. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.030. hal-01780163 HAL Id: hal-01780163 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01780163 Submitted on 27 Apr 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1! Structure-function analysis of the TssL cytoplasmic domain reveals a new 2! interaction between the Type VI secretion baseplate and membrane 3! complexes. 4! Abdelrahim Zoued1,#, Chloé J. Cassaro1, Eric Durand1, Badreddine Douzi2,3,¶, Alexandre P. 5! España1,†, Christian Cambillau2,3, Laure Journet1, and Eric Cascales1,* 6! 7! 1 Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Macromoléculaires (LISM, UMR 7255), Institut de 8! Microbiologie de la Méditerranée (IMM), Aix-Marseille Univ - Centre National de la Recherche 9! Scientifique (CNRS), 31 chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France 10! 2 Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB, UMR 6098), Centre National de 11! la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Campus de Luminy, Case 932, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Sonar Systems the History and Future of The
    THE SUBMARINE REVIEW FIXED SONAR SYSTEMS THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF THE UNDEWATER SILENT SENTINEL by LT John Howard, United States Navy Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California Undersea Warfare Department Executive Summary One of the most challenging aspects of Anti-Submarine War- fare (ASW) has been the detection and tracking of submerged contacts. One of the most successful means of achieving this goal was the Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) developed by the United States Navy in the early 1950's. It was designed using breakthrough discoveries of the propagation paths of sound through water and intended to monitor the growing submarine threat of the Soviet Union. SOSUS provided cueing of transiting Soviet submarines to allow for optimal positioning of U.S. ASW forces for tracking and prosecution of these underwater threats. SOSUS took on an even greater national security role with the advent of submarine launched ballistic missiles, ensuring that U.S. forces were aware of these strategic liabilities in case hostilities were ever to erupt between the two superpowers. With the end of the Cold War, SOSUS has undergone a number of changes in its utilization, but is finding itself no less relevant as an asset against the growing number of modern quiet submarines proliferating around the world. Introduction For millennia, humans seeking to better defend themselves have set up observation posts along the ingress routes to their key strongholds. This could consist of something as simple as a person hidden in a tree, to extensive networks of towers communicating 1 APRIL 2011 THE SUBMARINE REVIEW with signal fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity, Pages 1–11, Osaka, Japan, December 11-17 2016
    CL4LC 2016 Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity Proceedings of the Workshop December 11, 2016 Osaka, Japan Copyright of each paper stays with the respective authors (or their employers). ISBN 978-4-87974-709-9 ii Preface Welcome to the first edition of the “Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity” workshop (CL4LC)! CL4LC aims at investigating “processing” aspects of linguistic complexity with the objective of promoting a common reflection on approaches for the detection, evaluation and modelling of linguistic complexity. What has motivated such a focus on linguistic complexity? Although the topic of linguistic complexity has attracted researchers for quite some time, this concept is still poorly defined and often used with different meanings. Linguistic complexity indeed is inherently a multidimensional concept that must be approached from various perspectives, ranging from natural language processing (NLP), second language acquisition (SLA), psycholinguistics and cognitive science, as well as contrastive linguistics. In 2015, a one-day workshop dedicated to the question of Measuring Linguistic Complexity was organized at the catholic University of Louvain (UCL) with the aim of identifying convergent approaches in diverse fields addressing linguistic complexity from their specific viewpoint. Not only did the workshop turn out to be a great success, but it strikingly pointed out that more in–depth thought is required in order to investigate how research on linguistic complexity and its processing aspects could actually benefit from the sharing of definitions, methodologies and techniques developed from different perspectives. CL4LC stems from these reflections and would like to go a step further towards a more multifaceted view of linguistic complexity. In particular, the workshop would like to investigate processing aspects of linguistic complexity both from a machine point of view and from the perspective of the human subject in order to pinpoint possible differences and commonalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Sustainability Manual
    Energy Usage, GHG Reduction, Effi ciency and Load Management Manual Brewers Association Energy Usage, GHG Reduction, Effi ciency and Load Management Manual Energy Usage, GHG Reduction, Effi ciency and Load Management Manual 1 2 BrewersAssociation.org table of contents Acknowledgements . .4 Best Practices - Kitchen Area . 39 Introduction . .5 Best Practices - Dining Room . 40 Section 1: Sector Profi le – Energy Use in Breweries . .6 Best Practices - Parking Lot/Outdoor Seating . 40 1.1 Overview of Current Energy Use/Greenhouse Gas 3.5 Concerts and Events . 41 Performance and Trends . 6 Section 4: Onsite Renewable Energy . .42 1.2 Regulatory Drivers . 7 4.1 Technology and Use Application Review . 43 1.3 Non-Regulatory Drivers – Image/brand, community ties. 7 4.2 Fuel Availability . 43 1.4 Risks and Opportunities – Energy/Greenhouse 4.3 Fuel Supply and Cost . 43 Gas Reduction . 8 4.4 Size Selection and Infrastructure Impacts. 44 Section 2: Data Management . .9 4.5 Cost and Savings Review . 44 2.1 Data Collection . 9 4.6 Renewable Energy Certifi cates . 45 2.2 Ensuring accuracy . 11 Section 5: Brewery Case Studies . .46 2.3 Benchmarking – Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) . 11 5.1 Usage and Reduction . 46 2.4 Guidelines for Setting Measureable Goals and Objectives . .13 Boulevard Brewing Company – Kansas City, Missouri . 46 Section 3: Usage & Reduction Best Practices . .15 Deschutes Brewery – Bend, Oregon . 46 3.1 Brewing . 16 Harpoon Brewery – Boston, Massachusetts . 47 Best Practices – CO2 Recovery Systems . 16 New Belgium Brewing Company – Fort Collins, Colorado . 47 3.2 Packaging. 18 Sierra Nevada Brewing Company – Chico, California . 47 Best Practices - Variable Speed Drives .
    [Show full text]
  • Usafalmanac ■ Gallery of USAF Weapons
    USAFAlmanac ■ Gallery of USAF Weapons By Susan H.H. Young The B-1B’s conventional capability is being significantly enhanced by the ongoing Conventional Mission Upgrade Program (CMUP). This gives the B-1B greater lethality and survivability through the integration of precision and standoff weapons and a robust ECM suite. CMUP will include GPS receivers, a MIL-STD-1760 weapon interface, secure radios, and improved computers to support precision weapons, initially the JDAM, followed by the Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) and the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM). The Defensive System Upgrade Program will improve aircrew situational awareness and jamming capability. B-2 Spirit Brief: Stealthy, long-range, multirole bomber that can deliver conventional and nuclear munitions anywhere on the globe by flying through previously impenetrable defenses. Function: Long-range heavy bomber. Operator: ACC. First Flight: July 17, 1989. Delivered: Dec. 17, 1993–present. B-1B Lancer (Ted Carlson) IOC: April 1997, Whiteman AFB, Mo. Production: 21 planned. Inventory: 21. Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Contractor: Northrop Grumman, with Boeing, LTV, and General Electric as principal subcontractors. Bombers Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbo fans, each 17,300 lb thrust. B-1 Lancer Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Brief: A long-range multirole bomber capable of flying on zero/zero ejection seats. missions over intercontinental range without refueling, Dimensions: span 172 ft, length 69 ft, height 17 ft. then penetrating enemy defenses with a heavy load Weight: empty 150,000–160,000 lb, gross 350,000 lb. of ordnance. Ceiling: 50,000 ft. Function: Long-range conventional bomber.
    [Show full text]