See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252241873

Volcanism in the Orientale Basin: A Comparison to Other Nearside Lunar Basins

Conference Paper · March 2011

CITATIONS READS 0 100

4 authors, including:

Jennifer L Whitten James Head Smithsonian Institution Brown University

78 PUBLICATIONS 1,055 CITATIONS 2,129 PUBLICATIONS 59,620 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Matthew Staid Planetary Science Institute

103 PUBLICATIONS 2,623 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Venus Exploration: unveiling Esrth Twins View project

Geologic mapping of Venus View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Jennifer L Whitten on 02 September 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 2245.pdf

VOLCANISM IN THE ORIENTALE BASIN: A COMPARISON TO OTHER NEARSIDE LUNAR BASINS. J. L. Whitten1 and J. W. Head1, M. Staid2, C.M. Pieters1 and the M3 Team, 1Brown Univ., Providence RI 02912, 2PSI, Tucson AZ; ([email protected]).

Introduction: About 20% of the lunar surface is [8]. Since the basin interior has not been completely covered with mare deposits, including mare patches on filled with mare, each of its three main mountain rings the farside and limbs and larger more continuous de- is still visible (Inner Rook, Outer Rook, Cordillera) [9]. posits lying within and adjacent to the large impact The preservation of ring topography clearly separates basins on the nearside of the [1, 2, 3, 4]. Investi- all of the Orientale mare deposits and allows further gating volcanic activity in lunar basins can help to con- investigation of their ages and modes of emplacement. strain the thermal evolution of the Moon. In addition, Mare basalt emplacement began in the center of careful study of volcanic features can assist researchers the basin ~3.58 Ga, approximately a hundred million in further understanding the relationship between for- years after basin formation (~3.68 Ga), assuming this mation of basins and mare basalt petrogenesis. fill is the result of a single volcanic phase (Fig. 2). Several individual mare patches are located in the , the central deposit, erupted as a flood Orientale basin, itself located on the western limb of basalt and was followed closely by later pulses of vol- the Moon. It is the youngest multi-ring basin on the canism that produced the mare ponds in lunar surface [2]. Unlike the other large lunar multi- and lastly those in Lacus Autumni [5]. Estimated flow ring basins Orientale is well preserved, being only par- unit volumes range from 30 to 7,700 km3, averaging tially filled with mare, making it very useful for under- between 590 and 940 km3 [5]. This time sequence cor- standing the interior structure of other lunar basins and relates well with the concept that early flooding is their relationship to volcanic activity (Fig. 1). dominated by larger deposit thicknesses over a smaller Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) data [6,7] are area, and later flooding is opposite in character, with used to characterize the volcanic features within the shallower deposits that cover a larger area [10]. Orientale basin. Model ages, areas, volumes and vol- The youngest of these mare deposits occur along canic features (e.g., sinuous rilles and domes) were the edge of the basin in Lacus Autumni. Crater count mapped and measured. We compare our results for model ages range from 3.47 to 1.66 Ga (Fig. 2). A few Orientale basin with work from other researchers to of the ponds in Lacus Veris have ages between this determine the similarities and differences between the range as well. The abundance of sinuous channels and various nearside lunar basins. rilles in these two laci indicates a basaltic plains style volcanism, with both point sources and fissures [5,11]. Mare eruption locations are focused along the margins of the different basin rings, mostly in the form of vents and sinuous rilles. Most identified vents and all of the identified rilles are located on the eastern side of the Orientale basin [5]. No rilles exist on the south- western side of Orientale, likely the result of a very thick crust that hindered both the propagation of dikes to the surface and the opening of vents and extrusion of significant quantities of mare basalt over a sustained time period. The sequence and timing of mare basalt deposits suggest that regional basin-related stresses exerted control on their distribution [e.g., 12-14]. Our analysis clearly shows that Orientale serves as an ex- cellent example of the early stages of the filling of im- pact basins with mare basalt. Comparison with Other Basins: The model age distribution of Orientale mare basalts, between ~3.50 and ~1.66 Ga [5], shows that they span nearly the en- tire range of nearside model ages (Fig. 2). Even the Figure 1. LOLA topographic map of the Orientale basin. latest Orientale basalt patches are as young as some of White arrows point to different topographic rings. the youngest basalt deposits on the lunar nearside. The Summary: Orientale Basin Volcanism: Orien- majority of the mare ponds were deposited during the tale basin is dated to the beginning of the Upper Im- highest frequency of eruptions on the lunar nearside, brian period at ~3.68 Ga [5]. It is approximately 930 centered around 3.5 Ga (Fig. 2) [15]. km in diameter and covers an area of ~700,000 km2 42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 2245.pdf

The similarity in the range of mare model ages in- The lack of mare fill in Orientale has also allowed dicates that the small amount of mare fill in Orientale researchers to investigate the ring structure of other is not due to early cessation of mare emplacement, but lunar basins. Three different rings were estimated for to limited volumes of extrusion during the entire pe- the Serenitatis basin based on the spacing and mor- riod of nearside mare basalt volcanism. This suggests phology of the various rings in Orientale basin [20]. that nearside and farside volcanic source regions may Preliminary Conclusions and Future Work: In- be similar, but that other factors, such as thermal and vestigating Orientale basin has brought to light the crustal thickness barriers to magma ascent and erup- unique character of each of the lunar basins. They tion, may be determining the abundance of surface share many similarities, such as the presence of mare deposits on the limbs and farside. fill and predicted depths relative to diameter. However, Unlike Orientale, the sequence of filling is difficult they are also very different, having mare of different to define for most of the nearside basins. The continu- composition and age. Comparing Orientlae and Seren- ous high-volume eruptions have made the distinctions tiatis shows that one basin filled from the center our- more difficult. Most of the younger mare deposits on wards, while others appear to have filled from the the nearside are related to the Procellarum KREEP outer rim inwards based on surface exposure of mare Terrain [15]. Previous research has indicated that the units. Future work will focus on analyzing the various oldest deposits in Serenitatis and Crisium are located volcanic features of each lunar basin and comparing around the edge of the basins, opposite the situation in them with one another. Orientale [15-17]. Severals models dealing with different aspects of the infilling of lunar basins exist [e.g., 10,12-13,18]. One model suggests that the largest volume, but small- est area of mare fill occurs first in the center of the basin. The second stage of filling covers a much larger area, but also a smaller volume. This first stage would look similar to a circular plug, whereas the second stage would be more disk shaped [10]. Another model suggests that the infilling of basins is governed by lo- cal and global stresses. A central deposit creates a load great enough to produce local extensional stress at its edges which propogates outward over time due to a cooling thickening lithosphere [12]. The most obvious difference between Orientale and other nearside lunar basins is their volume of mare fill. Orientale mare ponds have comparatively low vol- Figure 2. Histogram of the temporal distribution of crater umes, totaling ~46,000 km3 [3,5]. All of the other count model ages for basalts in nearside and farside basins nearside lunar basins are filled with mare deposits. and craters (modified from Hiesinger et al., 2010). N=328 Therefore, calculated approximations for the total vol- represents nearside basalt ages from Hiesinger et al. [2010]. umes of the topographic depression of nearside basins N=16 represents the counts performed for Orientale basin in on the Moon [18] can be used as estimates of the vol- this study. ume of mare fill. Serenitatis and Nectaris, two basins References: [1] Head J.W. (1976) Rev. Geophys., 14, 265– similar in size to Orientale, have total basin volumes of 300. [2] Wilhelms D.E. (1987) USGS Prof. Pap. 1348. 1 x 106 km3 and 7 x 105 km3, respectively. The calcu- [3] Yingst R.A. (1997) JGR, 102, 10909–10931. [4] Head J.W. 5 3 and Wilson L. (1992) GCA, 55, 2155-2175. [5] Whitten J.L. et lated basin volume for Orientale is 7 x 10 km . There- al. (2011) JGR, in press. [6] Pieters C.M. et al. (2009) LPSC XL fore, Orientale has a volume that is typical for a lunar Abstract# 2052. [7] Green R. et al. (2011) LPSC XLII, these basin. Other studies have estimated basin diameters volumes. [8] Head, J.W. (1974) Moon, 11, 327-356. [9] Head and depths based on d/D relationships, corroborating J.W. et al.(2010) LPCs XLI, Abstract# 1030. [10] Head J.W. other estimates [19]. (1982) Moon & Planets, 26, 61-88. [11] Greeley R. (1976) Proc. LPSC VII, 2747-2759. [12] Solomon S.C. and Head J.W. (1979) This estimated basin volume for Orientale indicates 5 3 JGR, 84, 1667-1682. [13] Solomon S.C. and Head J.W. (1980) that there are ~6.55 x 10 km that were not filled with Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 18, 107-141. [14] McGovern P.J. & mare, meaning the mare load in the center of Orientale Litherland M.M. (2010) LPSC XLI, Abstract# 2724. [15] Hi- basin is not as massive as the initial central loads in esinger H. et al. (2010) GSA-Spec. Pap., in press. [16] Howard other lunar basins. A smaller central load suggests the K.A. et al. (1973) NASA Spec. Pap. 330. [17] Head J.W. et al. load necessary to cause extensional stresses around the (1978) in : The View from Luna 24. [18] Brattt S.R. et al. (1985) JGR, 90, 3049-3064. [19] Williams K.K. & edge of the basin is smaller than initially expected Zuber M.T. (1998) Icarus, 131, 107-122. [20] Head J.W. (1979) [12,13]. Moon & Planets, 21, 439-462.

View publication stats