Recall Elections by Gareth Griffith and Lenny Roth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recall Elections by Gareth Griffith and Lenny Roth E – BRIEF NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service February 2010 E-Brief 3/2010 Recall Elections by Gareth Griffith and Lenny Roth and conventions associated with 1 WHAT IS MEANT BY A representative democracy and, in the RECALL ELECTION? Westminster tradition, responsible In other jurisdictions Recall is a term government. Direct democracy, as the used to describe a process whereby name suggests, argues on behalf of the electorate can petition to trigger a popular involvement in the democratic vote on the suitability of an existing process, whereas the guiding ideas elected representative to continue in behind representative democracy tend office. In those jurisdictions where it to limit such involvement to the operates, Recall is seen as an choosing of representatives at election important, directly democratic, tool for time. the electorate to remove from office those elected representatives seen to In the direct or plebiscitary model, be ineffective. Members of Parliament are seen as ‘agents’ or ‘delegates’ of the electors. In the recent debate in NSW, the idea In the representative model, in the of a Recall election has taken a words of Edmund Burke, they are different form. Basically, it is not more than mere delegates. Rather, concerned with the Recall of an under this second model MPs are individual Member of Parliament. trustees of the electorate, there to Rather, the suggestion is that a Recall exercise their own judgement in the petition can be used to trigger an early broad interests of the nation, or 2 State election, thereby presenting the whatever form of polity is involved. electorate with the opportunity to remove an ineffective or unpopular The idea of Recall elections can be government. This argument has seen as a direct democracy check on developed in the context of four year representative democracy. As noted, fixed term Parliaments, under which an the mechanism operates in other early election can only be called under jurisdictions as a check on wayward or very limited circumstances.1 ineffective individual representatives: 2 THEORETICAL NOTE The Recall idea is based on the political theory that voters should There is in democratic thought and retain the right of control over their practice a schism between, on one elected officials’.3 side, participatory or plebiscitary processes and mechanisms, which can be discussed under the heading of ‘direct’ democracy and, on the other side, those processes, mechanisms Page 1 of 11 NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service 3 HISTORICAL NOTE Referendum and Recall would lay A complex history lies behind the both open to destructive harassing Recall idea. It is enough to say that by outside pressure groups and extremist forces and occasionally more populist versions of democracy th would lay each open to more or less developed in some quarters in the 19 irresponsible harassing by the century. For example, the Chartists in other…It would have been England campaigned for annual appropriate if the ALP had long elections. Referendums also became a since struck the anachronistic feature of democratic discourse, references from the Platform.4 including those initiated by citizens to pass or repeal particular laws. Note that in the context of the Federal Labor Party, LF Crisp stated that ‘there In Australia, populist checks on can be no doubt that Recall means representative democracy were recall of legislation, since it is linked advocated by the ALP, including the immediately with Initiative and NSW State Branch. Included under the Referendum’.5 It is possible that the heading ‘constitutional reform’ in the same applied at the State level. 1918 State Fighting Platform is the call However, at the 1916 Conference of for: the NSW Branch a resolution was moved to apply the Recall to Members Abolition of the Legislative Council of the NSW Parliament, which and the substitution therefor of the suggests that for some at least it was Initiative, Referendum and Recall. seen as a rank and file check on MPs.6 The 1965-66 State Objective and Professor George Williams has Platform includes the following agenda commented on this history: for constitutional reform: Australia has a long, forgotten Abolition of the Legislative Council. history of debating the Recall. The Institution of the Initiative ALP adopted the idea nationally in Referendum and Recall. its policy platform in 1912 but Abolition of the office of State dropped it in 1963. The Recall was Governor. also debated in the Queensland Parliament over 1917 and 1918, but While the Recall idea appealed to the was not passed. Today no rank and file, the prospect of it being Australian Parliament allows voters 7 acted upon by the party leadership to exercise a recall. was remote. Writing in 1955 about the Australian Federal Labor Party, LF 4 STANDPOINTS IN THE Crisp described the Recall and CONTEMPORARY DEBATE Initiative proposals as ‘anachronistic’. The Sydney Morning Herald is He wrote that Labor had long accepted currently inviting registered NSW the rules of the game of responsible voters to sign an online petition calling government: for a referendum to be held at the next State election to change the NSW the Initiative, Referendum and Constitution to allow for a Recall Recall cut right across the basic mechanism. As of 4 January 2010, 20, principles of responsible cabinet 054 people had signed the petition (no government. Both parties accept the broad traditions of the British updated figure has been published). parliamentary system: the Initiative, Page 2 of 11 E-Brief Recall Elections There has been considerable The SMH’s State political editor comment and debate on this issue, Andrew Clennel reported on the same from politicians, academics and others. day: These are presented in summary below. Mr O'Farrell said there were four chief reasons why people thought he 4.1 Political standpoints should not pursue recall elections, and he dismissed all of them. ''The first check [on it] is if you can't Barry O’Farrell – Leader of the get the signatures, well, clearly Opposition: there's not enough support there, so In a speech to the Sydney Institute in that's the first democratic feature March the Opposition Leader about it. announced that if elected in March ''Second, if you do get a fresh 2011 he would appoint a panel of election, it's possible the person constitutional experts to look at you're seeking to recall could win introducing a Recall election provision again. in NSW. He would then look for a ''Third, they argue that it's an referendum at either the 2012 local additional expense … [they] would probably argue we shouldn't have government elections or at the 2015 elections at all because they're State election to introduce a Recall pretty expensive too. provision. ''Fourth, they argue that it characterises all MPs or all Taking the debate a step further, the representatives as not hard-working SMH reported in December 2009: … well, I think, to quote Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott, that's just Mr O'Farrell said that if the Herald BS.'' campaign produced enough Mr O'Farrell ruled out another, signatures he would introduce possibly simpler, option to improve legislation next year in an attempt to democracy to NSW - a return to set up a referendum in 2011.8 three-year term. At that time Mr O’Farrell confirmed his Mr O’Farrell is quoted as saying: commitment to the Recall idea, stating: “So I'd be happy to have a fixed four-year term with a recall Recall elections are democratic, 10 increase accountability, offer a provision”. safeguard against abuse and can help restore confidence in, and Premier Keneally promote active involvement with, the On 12 December 2009 it was reported political process. The spectre of that the Premier would ‘support a being forced to an early election by debate’ on recall elections in NSW. the public could provide the stimulus The SMH reported: needed for government - even a NSW Labor one - to put in a full four- Ms Keneally said she was prepared year effort as well as a safeguard to listen if the public wanted a against political abuses…. A recall debate on the issue. "What I would election mechanism would give the say is that we're talking about a public a release valve. It would only significant constitutional change prove successful if first, supported here, one that is untested in the by sufficient petitioners, and second, Australian context," Ms Keneally told by a majority of electors in any reporters. The community should 9 subsequent poll. have a debate "before we would Page 3 of 11 NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service take such a step", she said. On one There have been surprisingly few side of the debate, fixed terms advances since the 19th century provided stability for a government campaigns of the Chartists for to make a hard decision "and deliver universal suffrage, secret ballots and on it". On the flipside, Ms Keneally payment for MPs. said a recall provision or even the A number of letters to the editor return of non-fixed terms could published in the Herald have warned "provide a better opportunity for that there can be a downside to the people to engage in the political right of recall on unpopular process".11 governments. In most of the US states with this provision, the bar is Andrew Stoner – Leader of the set at 12 per cent of votes cast at Nationals the previous election. Many now On behalf of the NSW Nationals, think this is too low. Cashed-up Andrew Stoner on 21 December 2009 lobby groups and corporate interests are able to wheel out sophisticated added his support for the debate on campaigns to gather the necessary the Recall idea in these terms: number of signatures.
Recommended publications
  • Sydney Harbour a Systematic Review of the Science 2014
    Sydney Harbour A systematic review of the science 2014 Sydney Institute of Marine Science Technical Report The Sydney Harbour Research Program © Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 2014 This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. Disclaimer The authors of this report are members of the Sydney Harbour Research Program at the Sydney Institute of Marine Science and represent various universities, research institutions and government agencies. The views presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of The Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the authors other affiliated institutions listed below. This report is a review of other literature written by third parties. Neither the Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the affiliated institutions take responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability, and correctness of any information included in this report provided in third party sources. Recommended Citation Hedge L.H., Johnston E.L., Ayoung S.T., Birch G.F., Booth D.J., Creese R.G., Doblin M.A., Figueira W.F., Gribben P.E., Hutchings P.A., Mayer Pinto M, Marzinelli E.M., Pritchard T.R., Roughan M., Steinberg P.D., 2013, Sydney Harbour: A systematic review of the science, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloging-in-Publication entry ISBN: 978-0-646-91493-0 Publisher: The Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Available on the internet from www.sims.org.au For further information please contact: SIMS, Building 19, Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW 2088 Australia T: +61 2 9435 4600 F: +61 2 9969 8664 www.sims.org.au ABN 84117222063 Cover Photo | Mike Banert North Head The light was changing every minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Recalling an Elected Official of the State Or a Political Subdivision
    2021-2023 __________________ RECALLING AN ELECTED OFFICIAL OF THE STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION North Dakota otes ✓ ss 2022 SECRETARY OF STATE Alvin A Jaeger State of North Dakota 600 E Boulevard Ave Dept 108 Bismarck ND 58505-0500 ELECTIONS UNIT (701) 328-4146 [email protected] Vote.ND.Gov Alternate formats for persons with disabilities are available upon request. August 2021 FOREWORD This pamphlet is a compilation of laws found in the North Dakota Century Code relating to the recall process in the state of North Dakota. It is a reference source for state and local election officials, candidates, the public and the media. If you have questions regarding this pamphlet, please contact the Elections Unit of the Secretary of State’s office by calling 701-328-4146, sending an email to [email protected], or writing to Secretary of State, Elections Unit, 600 East Boulevard Avenue Dept 108, Bismarck ND 58505-0500. DISCLAIMER The following excerpts of North Dakota law are from the North Dakota Century Code (NDCC) and pertain to elections, election procedures, and the recall process. Although every attempt has been made for accuracy, the reprint of these laws does not carry the same authority as the actual NDCC and should not be equated with the official NDCC. This compilation is only intended as a helpful resource and reference for consolidated election related laws. For official and legal purposes, the official NDCC should be used. In addition, the following excerpts of North Dakota law do not contain the material found in the legal notes following the various sections contained in the NDCC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Election Calendar
    2021 Idaho Election Calendar Revised 09/16/2021 This edition of the 2021 Idaho Election Calendar is subject to amendatory changes during the 2021 session of the Idaho Legislature. If changes occur, an updated version will be published. Jan. 4 Election Register Examination: Deadline for county clerks to examine the election register, from the Nov. 3 election, and note challenges. [§34-432(1), Idaho Code] Jan. 15 Absentee Voter Report: Deadline for county clerks to submit report on General Election absentee voters to the secretary of state, as required by federal law. [§34-1002, Idaho Code] Jan. 15 Early Voting Security Plan: Deadline for county clerks to submit their ballot security plan to the secretary of state. (*NOTE: The Early Voting Security Plan must be submitted at least 30 days prior to implementing an early voting plan.) [§34-1013, Idaho Code] Jan. 19 Ballot Question Submission Deadline: School districts must supply ballot language (to the county clerk) for any bond or property tax levy questions — to be placed on the ballot — for the March 9 election. [§34- 106(8), Idaho Code] Jan. 22 Deadline for County Clerk to order recall election for Political Subdivision for the March 9 election. [§34- 106(9) and §34-1707, Idaho Code] Jan. 28 Voting Procedure Modifications: Deadline for county clerks to submit their plans to the secretary of state if they want to modify voting procedures (for a political subdivision) — for the March 9 election. [§34-1413, Idaho Code] Jan. 28 Print Absentee Ballots: Last day for county clerk to print absentee ballots for the March 9 election.
    [Show full text]
  • California Institute of Technology
    DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125 COMPARING ABSENTEE AND PRECINCT VOTERS: A VIEW OVER TIME Jeffrey A. Dubin Gretchen A. Kalsow <� er: 0 1891 U- ,.... 0 ')/,.. 0 0 '\'- SOCI AL SCIENCE WORKING PAPER 942 October 1995 COMPARING ABSENTEE AND PRECINCT VOTERS: A VIEW OVER TIME Jeffrey A. Dubin Gretchen A. Kalsow Abstract This paper examines the trend in absentee voting over the last thirty years in Cali­ fornia. With the liberalization of absentee voting laws and practices, an increase in the numbers of absentee voters quickly followed. Absentee voters have already demonstrated their ability to influence the outcomes of local elections. An open question is what will become of absentee voters in the future. If they are the model for "voting at home," and if technological advances allow such, then the behavior of current absentee voters may be indicative of the future electorate. The increasing trend of voters opting for absentee ballots is analyzed by using GLS on a random effects time-series cross-section model with county level data. The focus is on identifying structural factors such as changing voter demographics that have influenced the decision of voters to cast absentee ballots. Thirty-three recent state-wide elections in California are the basis for this analysis, covering the statewide primary and general elections from November 1962, through November 1994. We find that the impact of demographics and time trends on absentee voting differ between general and primary elections. In addition, we find that a 1977 liberalization law in California had the effect of accelerating the usage of the absentee format.
    [Show full text]
  • Recall of Mps
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 June 2012 HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12] Published on 28 June 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pcrc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 7 Sb130-133/2122 REGULAR ELECTION SCHEDULING SB 130
    REGULAR ELECTION SCHEDULING S.B. 130-133: SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL IN COMMITTEE Senate Bills 130 through 133 (as introduced 2-11-21) Sponsor: Senator Aric Nesbitt (S.B. 130 and 132) Senator Paul Wojno (S.B. 131 and 133) Committee: Elections Date Completed: 6-23-21 CONTENT Senate Bill 130 would amend the Michigan Election Law to do the following: -- Amend the definition of "odd year primary election" to mean the election held on the June, instead of August, regular election date in an odd numbered year. -- Require general primaries that currently take place on the Tuesday after the first Monday in August before every November general election to take place in June. -- Specify that nominating petitions would have to be received by the Secretary of State (SOS) or filed with an applicable clerk up to 4 PM on the fifteenth Tuesday before the June, instead of August, primary. -- Require certain election activities that are scheduled in accordance with an August primary to be scheduled in accordance with a June primary. -- Require the filing deadline or certification deadline for a nomination by caucus or by filing a petition or affidavit to be 4 PM on the fifteenth Tuesday before the March, instead of May, election. -- Require the chairperson of the county committee or district committee of a Congressional district of each political party, by February 1 in even numbered years, instead of April 1, to provide to the board of election commissioners a certificate showing the number of delegates to the county convention in which each precinct of the county is entitled.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Charter
    CHARTER TOWN OF ATHOL Approved by voters on April 3, 2000 Effective July 1, 2000 Amended April 4, 2005 Amended April 3, 2006 Amended April 2, 2007 Amended April 6, 2015 PREAMBLE ................................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1 – POWERS OF THE TOWN ................................................................................... 4 Section 1 Incorporation ........................................................................................................... 4 Section 2 Scope of Town Powers ........................................................................................... 4 Section 3 Form of Government............................................................................................... 4 Section 4 Construction of Charter........................................................................................... 4 Section 5 Intergovernmental Relations ................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 – TOWN MEETING ................................................................................................ 5 Section 1 Organization ............................................................................................................ 5 Section 2 Powers and Responsibilities ................................................................................... 5 Section 3 Procedures ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Howard Government Success but Not Succession
    The Sydney Institute Quarterly Issue 33, August 2008 immediately knew that his days as Treasurer were numbered. Not only had the Opposition replaced THE HOWARD Hayden with the extremely popular Hawke. But Fraser had lost what benefit there might have been in GOVERNMENT surprising Labor by calling an early election - the normal time for going to the polls would have been SUCCESS around October 1983. And so it came to pass that Hawke Labor comprehensively defeated the Coalition at the March BUT NOT 1993 election. The ALP polled 53.2 per cent of the total vote after the distribution of preferences - a SUCCESSION Labor record. Howard was devastated by the result. However, both in public and private, he registered pride in his wife’s evident wisdom and political Gerard Henderson acumen - in that she had anticipated Labor’s winning leadership change strategy to overturn some seven years of Coalition government. t seems that wisdom - just like beauty - frequently I resides in the eye of the beholder. Even when it HOWARD’S FATAL MISCALCULATION comes to the Liberal Party leadership. What was wise Around a quarter of a century later, Howard led the in, say, 1983 can be forgotten a quarter of a century later. Liberal Party to a devastating defeat - with Labor In 1983 John Howard told journalist Paul Kelly about attaining 52.7 per cent of the total vote after the how he learnt that Bob Hawke had replaced Bill distribution of preferences. This was the ALP’s second Hayden as Labor leader on the eve of the March 1983 highest vote ever - only exceeded by Hawke’s victory Federal election.
    [Show full text]
  • PKD Otaku # 12 - February 2004 1 a Question of Chronology: 1955 – 1958 Frame
    "SCOTT MEREDITH TO PKD" September 30 [1968] Dear Phil, Thanks very much for our letter. Doubleday can't yet release the full $4500 because the money hasn't come in yet from NAL. We have asked them to advance some -- up to $1500 -- and we're confident this will be coming in very soon. In the meantime, I'm happy to send you a check for the $1500, less commission, as our advance on the Doubleday money. Here, then, is $1350. Doubleday, of course, is very anxious to see the new book you've mentioned to us and to Larry, and if you could send in a completed half, say in two weeks or so, they'll be able to issue an immediate contract. And, of course, they're very anxious about DEUS IRAE, mostly because they'd like to contract for THE NAME OF THE GAME IS DEATH as soon as possible, but cannot until they have something more on DEUS IRAE. This is necessary because GAME in only in outline form, whereas the new one is completed in rough draft. Now I'd like to pass on some very encouraging news from Norman Spinrad -- we know you've been talking to him about this -- that the editor at Essex House is very interested in seeing some of your old unpublished novels. They are of course moving out of the sex lines and the editor is an old S-F fan. They would pay from $1000 to $1500 for any they might want to do. By all means, send in these old ones and we'll be happy to push for you in his area.
    [Show full text]
  • Indice: 0. Philip K. Dick. Biografía. La Esquizofrenia De Dick. Antonio Rodríguez Babiloni 1
    Indice: 0. Philip K. Dick. Biografía. La esquizofrenia de Dick. Antonio Rodríguez Babiloni 1. El cuento final de todos los cuentos. Philip K. Dick. 2. El impostor. Philip K. Dick. 3. 20 años sin Phil. Ivan de la Torre. 4. La mente alien. Philip K. Dick. 5. Philip K. Dick: ¿Aún sueñan los hombres con ovejas de carne y hueso? Jorge Oscar Rossi. 6. Podemos recordarlo todo por usted. Philip K. Dick. 7. Philip K. Dick en el cine 8. Bibliografía general de Philip K. Dick PHILIP K. DICK. BIOGRAFÍA. LA ESQUIZOFRENIA DE DICK. Antonio Rodríguez Babiloni Biografía: Philip. K. Dick (1928-1982) Nació prematuramente, junto a su hermana gemela Jane, el 2 de marzo 1928, en Chicago. Jane murió trágicamente pocas semanas después. La influencia de la muerte de Jane fue una parte dominante de la vida y obra de Philp K. Dick. El biógrafo Lawrence Sutin escribe; ...El trauma de la muerte de Jane quedó como el suceso central de la vida psíquica de Phil Dos años más tarde los padres de Dick, Dorothy Grant y Joseph Edgar Dick se mudaron a Berkeley. A esas alturas el matrimonio estaba prácticamente roto y el divorcio llegó en 1932, Dick se quedó con su madre, con la que se trasladó a Washington. En 1940 volvieron a Berkeley. Fue durante este período cuando Dick comenzó a leer y escribir ciencia ficción. En su adolescencia, publicó regularmente historias cortas en el Club de Autores Jovenes, una columna el Berkeley Gazette. Devoraba todas las revistas de ciencia-ficción que llegaban a sus manos y muy pronto empezó a ser influido por autores como Heinlein y Van Vogt.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's System of Government
    61 Australia’s system of government Australia is a federation, a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy. This means that Australia: Has a Queen, who resides in the United Kingdom and is represented in Australia by a Governor-General. Is governed by a ministry headed by the Prime Minister. Has a two-chamber Commonwealth Parliament to make laws. A government, led by the Prime Minister, which must have a majority of seats in the House of Representatives. Has eight State and Territory Parliaments. This model of government is often referred to as the Westminster System, because it derives from the United Kingdom parliament at Westminster. A Federation of States Australia is a federation of six states, each of which was until 1901 a separate British colony. The states – New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania - each have their own governments, which in most respects are very similar to those of the federal government. Each state has a Governor, with a Premier as head of government. Each state also has a two-chambered Parliament, except Queensland which has had only one chamber since 1921. There are also two self-governing territories: the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. The federal government has no power to override the decisions of state governments except in accordance with the federal Constitution, but it can and does exercise that power over territories. A Constitutional Monarchy Australia is an independent nation, but it shares a monarchy with the United Kingdom and many other countries, including Canada and New Zealand. The Queen is the head of the Commonwealth of Australia, but with her powers delegated to the Governor-General by the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court and Responsible Government: 1864–1930, 40 Neb
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 40 | Issue 1 Article 3 1960 The uprS eme Court and Responsible Government: 1864–1930 Roscoe Pound Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Roscoe Pound, The Supreme Court and Responsible Government: 1864–1930, 40 Neb. L. Rev. 16 (1961) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol40/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Supreme Court and Responsible Government: 1864-1930* Roscoe Pound* * I. INTRODUCTION A just balance between the general and the local government is of the very essence of a federal polity. What is general and for the general government, and what is local and for the local govern- ment, must be distinguished clearly and maintained consistently. But what is general and what local is not always and everywhere indicated by an exactly drawn line and may vary from time to time or place to place, so that lines have to be redrawn in view of changes in economics, industry, and commerce. Moreover, a federal polity calls for constitutional law. A con- stitution is not a mere body of constitutionally prescribed rules; rules prescribing mode of choice, terms of office, powers, remunera- tion, and causes and modes of removal of officials; nor of rules of policing, definition of offenses, such, for example, as treason, and fixing and imposing penalties.
    [Show full text]