DOCSLIB.ORG

Equal Representation in Electoral

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equal Representation in Electoral VOTE WEIGHTING IN ELECTORAL SYSTEMS: THE ‘ONE VOTE, ONE VALUE’ DEBATE IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Norman John Patrick Kelly A dissertation presented as part of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Social Sciences (Politics) (Honours) within the Faculty of Media, Society and Culture of the Curtin University of Technology, 2004. November 2004 One Vote, One Value ii Declaration I declare that this Honours thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given. Norman John Patrick Kelly 1 November 2004 One Vote, One Value iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my thanks to my supervisors, Associate Professor David Charnock and Dr Alan Fenna – David, particularly for assisting in the development of the scope and direction of the thesis, and theoretical perspectives; and Alan, for your willingness to step in at a late stage of the project. Thank you to the staff at Curtin, particularly Dr Philip Moore and Dr Patrick Bertola, who always responded promptly and effectively to my long- distance requests. Thanks also to Karin Hosking and Liz Foster, for your technical guidance in the preparation of the thesis, and to the staff at the Parliamentary Library of Western Australia, and Members’ staff, for your ready assistance. Special thanks go to my interview participants, who generously gave of their time to openly discuss matters that were of particular political sensitivity. Finally, special thanks go to my partner Gail, whose encouragement, belief, emotional and practical support, and love, helped ensure the success of this project. One Vote, One Value iv Abstract Electoral systems play the predominant role in determining the nature of political expression in representative democracies. The manipulation of an electoral system to favour a particular group or class of citizens distorts the representative nature of a legislature and therefore diminishes the legitimacy that a parliament or government may claim. Australian electoral systems have a history of vote weighting, where citizens from particular geographic areas or jurisdictions receive an enhanced value for their vote. In recent decades, there has been a general trend in Australia to adopt models of voting equality, with all legislatures except Western Australia now having to some extent put in place voting based on the principle of one vote, one value. The issue of electoral reform in Western Australia, and particularly the question of voting equality, currently remains largely unresolved, with an expectation that the result of the upcoming state election, due in late 2004 or early 2005, will determine future directions for reform. The general aim of the current study was to add to the theoretical and practical understanding of vote weighting in Australian electoral systems. This was carried out by conducting an analysis of the attempts by the Gallop Labor Government from 2001 to 2004 to reform the Western Australian electoral system. The central research question was ‘What political forces were at play during the legislative and judicial debates on the Gallop Government’s attempt to introduce electoral reform based on one vote, one value?’ The study incorporated a triangulation of method and data source, and incorporated both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, including personal interviews with key participants in the debates. The findings suggest that while political theory may be applied in designing electoral systems, political imperatives will ultimately determine their construction. In the Western Australian debate, certain political parties are more adept at adopting strategies that minimise public criticism for unpopular decisions, and the major political parties are willing to consider alliances at the expense of minor parties. In addition, governments have the ability to limit the effectiveness of parliaments through the restriction of funding. It is hoped that these results will contribute to the knowledge in the area of electoral system development and design. One Vote, One Value v Table of Contents Title Page i Declaration ii Acknowledgments iii Abstract iv Table of Contents v List of Tables viii List of Graphs ix List of Maps ix Acronyms x Quotations xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Methodological Considerations 4 2.1 Contextual Issues 4 2.2 Method 5 2.3 Quantitative – Indices of Malapportionment 6 2.3.1 David-Eisenberg Index 7 2.3.2 Dauer-Kelsay Index 7 2.3.3 Gini Index / Coefficient 7 2.4 Qualitative – Interview Techniques 9 2.4.1 Interview Participants 10 2.5 The Role of the Researcher 10 Chapter 3 Political Theory of Representative Democracies and Electoral Systems 12 3.1 Representative Government 12 3.2 British Origins of Electoral Systems 13 3.3 Types of Electoral Systems 14 3.4 Australian Electoral Systems – Bicameral and Unicameral Parliaments 17 3.5 The Value of a Vote – Malapportionment and One Vote, One Value 18 3.6 Summary 20 One Vote, One Value vi Chapter 4 Australian Electoral Systems 21 4.1 The Federal Electoral System 21 4.1.1 The Senate 22 4.1.2 The House of Representatives 24 4.2 Recent Attempts to Introduce the Principle of One Vote, One Value to the Federal System 26 4.3 State and Territory Electoral Systems 28 4.3.1 Victoria 29 4.3.2 New South Wales 30 4.3.3 South Australia 30 4.3.4 Queensland 30 4.3.5 Tasmania 32 4.3.6 Australian Capital Territory 32 4.3.7 Northern Territory 33 4.4 Summary 34 Chapter 5 Western Australia – The Electoral System 35 5.1 Early History 35 5.2 Labor Party Actions towards Electoral Reform – 1970s to 1990s 40 5.3 Commission on Government 42 5.4 Election Results – 1996 and 2001 43 5.5 Current Electoral Boundaries 45 5.6 Summary 47 Chapter 6 Western Australia – Recent Attempts at Electoral Reform 50 6.1 Coalition Moves for Reform 51 6.2 The Lead Up to Legislation 51 6.3 The Gallop Labor Government Introduces Legislation 53 6.3.1 The Electoral Distribution Repeal Bill 2001 53 6.3.2 The Electoral Amendment Bill 2001 53 6.4 The Parliamentary Debates 54 6.4.1 The Legislative Assembly Debate 54 6.4.2 Initial Legislative Council Debate 55 6.4.3 Standing Committee Inquiry 56 6.4.4 Action by the Clerk of the Parliaments 58 One Vote, One Value vii 6.4.5 Renewed Parliamentary Debate 58 6.4.6 Summary of Parliamentary Actions 59 6.5 Supreme Court Action 59 6.6 High Court Action 60 6.7 Summary 61 Chapter 7 Findings 63 7.1 The Impact of One Vote, One Value on Labor and the Coalition 63 7.2 The Role of the Greens 65 7.2.1 Determining the Greens’ Position 66 7.2.2 The Greens Model – Self-Interest or an Ethical Position? 67 7.2.3 Strategic Response to the Greens Model 68 7.3 The Role of the Coalition Parties 70 7.3.1 Liberal Party 70 7.3.2 National Party 71 7.4 Initiating Supreme Court Action 72 7.5 Further Negotiations 74 7.6 A Deliberative Vote for the President 75 7.7 Subsequent Developments 76 7.8 Summary 77 Chapter 8 Concluding Discussion 78 8.1 Summary of Findings 78 8.2 Future Scenarios 80 8.3 Strengths and Limitations of the Study 81 8.4 Future Research 82 8.5 Conclusion 83 References 84 Appendices 94 Appendix A – Legislation 94 Appendix B – Participant Information Form 105 One Vote, One Value viii List of Tables 4.1 Enrolments per Elected Senator (based on the 2004 half-Senate election) 22 4.2 Enrolment numbers for House of Representatives electorates, by State/Territory (2004 election figures) 24 4.3 Allowable Variation (%) from Average Quota 29 5.1 Historical Malapportionment in the Legislative Assembly, Western Australia (one election from each decade) 38 5.2 Western Australian Legislative Assembly – Comparison of voting support and number of seats won 44 5.3 Western Australian Legislative Council – Comparison of voting support and number of seats won 45 5.4 Western Australian Enrolment Figures – Legislative Assembly Electorates (Divisions) as at 13 July 2004 46 6.1 Western Australian Legislative Council – Seats by Party, 1997-2004 51 7.1 Western Australian Legislative Assembly – Seats by Party, August 2001 64 7.2 Labor’s Proposed Reform of Legislative Assembly seats 64 7.3 The Greens Model for the Legislative Council 67 One Vote, One Value ix List of Graphs 2.1 Gini Index for the Legislative Assembly, Western Australia, 1927 8 4.1 Australian Senate – 2004 Half-Senate Election 23 4.2 Australian House of Representatives – 2004 Election 26 4.3 Queensland Assembly, enrolments at 31 August 2004 31 4.4 Australian Capital Territory, enrolments at 16 October 2004 election 33 4.5 Northern Territory Assembly, enrolments at 7 April 2004 34 5.1 Western Australian Legislative Assembly, enrolments at 13 July 2004 39 5.2 Western Australian Legislative Council, enrolments at 13 July 2004 40 List of Maps 5.1 Non-Metropolitan Regions 48 5.2 Metropolitan Regions 49 One Vote, One Value x Acronyms ACT Australian Capital Territory AGPS Australian Government Publishing Service AEC Australian Electoral Commission Austlii Australasian Legal Information Institute CDL Country and Democratic League COG Commission on Government DLP Democratic Labor Party ECQ Electoral Commission of Queensland HCA High Court of Australia JSCEM Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters LAACT Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory LCL Liberal Country League NSW New South Wales NTEC Northern Territory Electoral Commission SCL Standing Committee on Legislation SCWA Supreme Court of Western Australia SLCRC Senate Legal and Constitutional References Committee TDPC Tasmanian Department of Premier and Cabinet VEC Victorian Electoral Commission WAEC Western Australian Electoral Commission One Vote, One Value xi The cause of all these evils was love of power due to ambition and greed, which led to the rivalries from which party spirit sprung.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950
    82 The Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 After the Second World War ended with the defeat of Germany and Japan in 1945, a new global conflict between Communist and non-Communist blocs threatened world peace. The Cold War, as it was called, had substantial domestic repercussions in Australia. First, the spectre of Australians who were committed Communists perhaps operating as fifth columnists in support of Communist states abroad haunted many in the Labor, Liberal and Country parties. The Soviet Union had been an ally for most of the war, and was widely understood to have been crucial to the defeat of Nazism, but was now likely to be the main opponent if a new world war broke out. The Communist victory in China in 1949 added to these fears. Second, many on the left feared persecution, as anti-Communist feeling intensified around the world. Such fears were particularly fuelled by the activities of Senator Joe McCarthy in the United States of America. McCarthy’s allegations that Communists had infiltrated to the highest levels of American government gave him great power for a brief period, but he over-reached himself in a series of attacks on servicemen in the US Army in 1954, after which he was censured by the US Senate. Membership of the Communist Party of Australia peaked at around 20,000 during the Second World War, and in 1944 Fred Paterson won the Queensland state seat of Bowen for the party. Although party membership began to decline after the war, many Communists were prominent in trade unions, as well as cultural and literary circles.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Governor Annual Report 2014
    Office of the Governor of Tasmania Annual Report 1 July 2014- 30 June 2015 Government House Hobart Available on the Office of the Governor website: www. ovhouse. tas. ov. au Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Letter ofTransmittal 3 Mission 4 Objectives The Office of the Governor 4 Overview 4 Organisational Structure 4 Functions of the Office 5 Corporate Governance 5 Output Report 6 Output 1. 1 Support of the Governor 6 Financial Performance 6 Performance Indicators for Output 1.1 6 Qualitative Assessment 7 Key Activities - Results 7 The Year in Review 8 Constitutional 8 Administration in the absence of the Governor 10 Ceremonial 11 Visitors to Government House 13 Significantevents 13 School and community groups 19 Official callers and DiplomaticVisits 20 Recqrtions 22 Monthly State Rooms and garden tours 24 Government House productivity and training services 24 External events 25 The Government House website 28 The Government House Estate 28 Staff 29 Honorary Aides-de-Camp 30 Human Resource Management 31 Indicators of OrganisationalHealth 31 - Sick Leave and Overtime 31 - Staff Turnover 31 -Staff Leave 31 - Workers' Compensation 31 StaffEnterprise Agreement and StaffAward 31 Training and Development 32 Training Services 32 Industrial Relations 32 Work Health and Safety 32 Asset Management and Risk Policies 32 Asset Management 32 Maintenance and Capital Programs 33 Asset Management Systems 33 Acquisition and Disposal ofAssets 33 Risk Management 33 Government Procurement - Support for Local Business 33 Supplementary Information 33 Pricing
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy-To-Win-An-Election-Lessons
    WINNING ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY 1983-1996 i The Institute of International Studies (IIS), Department of International Relations, Universitas Gadjah Mada, is a research institution focused on the study on phenomenon in international relations, whether on theoretical or practical level. The study is based on the researches oriented to problem solving, with innovative and collaborative organization, by involving researcher resources with reliable capacity and tight society social network. As its commitments toward just, peace and civility values through actions, reflections and emancipations. In order to design a more specific and on target activity, The Institute developed four core research clusters on Globalization and Cities Development, Peace Building and Radical Violence, Humanitarian Action and Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. This institute also encourages a holistic study which is based on contempo- rary internationalSTRATEGY relations study scope TO and WIN approach. AN ELECTION: ii WINNING ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY 1983-1996 By Dafri Agussalim INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA iii WINNING ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY 1983-1996 Penulis: Dafri Agussalim Copyright© 2011, Dafri Agussalim Cover diolah dari: www.biogenidec.com dan http:www.foto.detik.com Diterbitkan oleh Institute of International Studies Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada Cetakan I: 2011 x + 244 hlm; 14 cm x 21 cm ISBN: 978-602-99702-7-2 Fisipol UGM Gedung Bulaksumur Sayap Utara Lt. 1 Jl. Sosio-Justisia, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 Telp: 0274 563362 ext 115 Fax.0274 563362 ext.116 Website: http://www.iis-ugm.org E-mail: [email protected] iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book is a revised version of my Master of Arts (MA) thesis, which was written between 1994-1995 in the Australian National University, Canberra Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases
    RESEARCH DISCUSSION PAPER The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases Chris Cunneen and Julia Grix Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney Law School NUMBER 15 AN AIATSIS RESEARCH DISCUSSION PAPER The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases Chris Cunneen and Julia Grix Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney Law School, 173-175 Phillip St, Sydney Research Discussion Paper # 15 First published in 2004 by the Research Section Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies GPO Box 553 Canberra ACT 2601 AIATSIS Research publications co-ordinator: Graeme K Ward Their views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Tory Strait Islander Studies. Copyright ©AIATSIS Apart from any fear dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF AUSTRALIA CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA: Chris Cunneen and Julia Grix The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases ISBN 0 85575 483 4 1. Aboriginal Australians – Children – Government Policy. 2. Aboriginal Australians – Legal status, laws, etc. 3. Aboriginal Australians – Removal. I. Grix, Julia. II. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. III. Title. (Series: Research discussion paper (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies)
    [Show full text]
  • Participants in the Courtroom Counsel, Timings When Counsel Commence and Finish Court Etiquette in the Three Courtrooms
    Portraits of the first 11 Chief Justices are displayed cases involving the interpretation of the Australian Participants in the Courtroom counsel, timings when counsel commence and finish Court Etiquette in the three courtrooms. Photographic portraits of all Constitution, or disputes between states, or between speaking, adjournments and pronouncements by the HIGH COURT Chief Justices and Justices who have sat on the Court the Commonwealth and one or more states. Matters As you enter the courtroom, it may be helpful for you Bench. The Clerk also times the oral presentations in The High Court building is open to the public. We since its inception are displayed along the wall outside raising constitutional questions may involve the to understand the various roles of the people you are special leave applications and controls the counsel request your cooperation in respecting our restrictions Courtroom 1. intervention of some or all of the Attorneys-General for about to see. warning lights on the lectern. When reserved judgments and requirements for visitors. Court Guides are stationed OF AUSTRALIA the Commonwealth, the states and the territories. are delivered, an additional Associate attends in Court around the Public Hall and will advise you of courtroom www.hcourt.gov.au Commemorative Plaques Justices to collect the written judgments from each of the protocol. It is customary, as a matter of respect to the Oral Argument The Justices enter the courtroom through a door to the Justices as they are pronounced and delivers them to Court when it is in session, that you bow on entry into A feature wall at the lower entrance to the building right of the Bench.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Head of State: Putting Republicanism Into the Republic
    The Australian Head of State: Putting Republicanism into the Republic The Australian Head of State: Putting Republicanism into the Republic* Harry Evans A reasonably detached observer could be forgiven for thinking that the Australian republican movement is floundering. The arguments against sharing a nominal head of state with another country, which is now a member of a foreign quasi-federation, seemed so irresistible. Why does the movement fall so far short of the degree of popular support required to carry the change? A large part of the explanation is provided by a lack of coherence in the official republican movement, which is illustrated by the head of state issue.1 Having proclaimed that the monarchy must go, and that we must have an Australian president, the movement immediately founders on the question of how the replacement is to be chosen. The response of a large majority of Australians, according to the polls, is that they want to elect a president.2 The official republicans recoil in horror from such a suggestion, resort to irrational arguments against it, and speak of the need to re-educate the public.3 It has to be explained to the people that we are making the change in such a way as to avoid changing the system of government: an odd argument for any kind of reformers attempting to persuade people to change anything. Never * This article was first published in Agenda, vol. 3, no. 2, 1996. Harry Evans is the Clerk of the Senate. 1 The conclusions of the official movement are contained in a statement by the Prime Minister, the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constitutional Convention (Year 7)
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Office of the Legislative Assembly Civics and Citizenship—Australian curriculum The Australian Constitution—A Constitutional Convention (Year 7) Civic Square, London Circuit GPO Box 1020, Canberra ACT 2601 Phone (02) 6205 3016 Email [email protected] www.parliament.act.gov.au Facebook @ACTAssembly Twitter @ACT_Assembly Table of Contents A Constitutional Convention ............................................................................................................... 1 Australian curriculum ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Learn about the Australian Constitution ............................................................................................... 1 Case study on the Australian Constitution ............................................................................................ 3 Reforming the Australian Constitution .................................................................................................. 4 Possible topics for proposed Constitutional changes ........................................................................... 5 Conducting a referendum ...................................................................................................................... 6 Reflection
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court and the Parliament Partners in Law-Making Or Hostile Combatants?*
    The High Court and the Parliament Partners in law-making or hostile combatants?* Michael Coper The question of when a human life begins poses definitional and philosophical puzzles that are as familiar as they are unanswerable. It might surprise you to know that the question of when the High Court of Australia came into existence raises some similar puzzles,1 though they are by contrast generally unfamiliar and not quite so difficult to answer. Interestingly, the High Court tangled with this issue in its very first case, a case called Hannah v Dalgarno,2 argued—by Wise3 on one side and Sly4 on the other—on 6 and 10 November 1903, and decided the next day on a date that now positively reverberates with constitutional significance, 11 November.5 * This paper was presented as a lecture in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series at Parliament House on 19 September 2003. I am indebted to my colleagues Fiona Wheeler and John Seymour for their comments on an earlier draft. 1 See Tony Blackshield and Francesca Dominello, ‘Constitutional basis of Court’ in Tony Blackshield, Michael Coper and George Williams (eds), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia, South Melbourne, Vic., Oxford University Press, 2001 (hereafter ‘The Oxford Companion’): 136. 2 (1903) 1 CLR 1; Francesca Dominello, ‘Hannah v Dalgarno’ in The Oxford Companion: 316. 3 Bernhard Ringrose Wise (1858–1916) was the Attorney-General for NSW and had been a framer of the Australian Constitution. 4 Richard Sly (1849–1929) was one of three lawyer brothers (including George, a founder of the firm of Sly and Russell), who all had doctorates in law.
    [Show full text]
  • To Be Called the High Court of Australia on the First Day of the 20Th Century
    . to be called the High Court of Australia On the first day of the 20th century, the Commonwealth of Australia came into existence. This new country had a new Constitution. That document set out the powers of the new Parliament and it allowed for the creation of a new court to oversee the exercise of those powers. “The judicial power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a federal Supreme Court, to be called the High Court of Australia.” The Court commenced operating in 1903 when the Governor-General appointed the Court’s first three members, Sir Samuel Griffith as the Chief Justice, and Sir Edmund Barton and Richard O’Connor as the other Justices. Each of them had been heavily involved in the Constitutional Conventions in the late 19th century. Today, the High Court of Australia sits at the apex of Australia’s justice system. The Court derives its authority directly from the Constitution and has two main functions: first, to interpret the Australian Constitution and, secondly, to sit as the final Court of Appeal on all matters arising in Federal, State and Territory courts. For the first 80 years of its life the Court was without a home of its own. It sat mostly in Sydney and Melbourne. When it travelled to other State capitals, it used the court rooms, offices and libraries of the State Supreme Courts. On 26 May 1980 the High Court building was opened and Australia’s highest Court had a permanent new home. While the Court does most of its public work in Canberra, it still travels and usually sits once a year in each State capital, apart from Sydney and Melbourne, where it sits on several occasions each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's System of Government
    61 Australia’s system of government Australia is a federation, a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy. This means that Australia: Has a Queen, who resides in the United Kingdom and is represented in Australia by a Governor-General. Is governed by a ministry headed by the Prime Minister. Has a two-chamber Commonwealth Parliament to make laws. A government, led by the Prime Minister, which must have a majority of seats in the House of Representatives. Has eight State and Territory Parliaments. This model of government is often referred to as the Westminster System, because it derives from the United Kingdom parliament at Westminster. A Federation of States Australia is a federation of six states, each of which was until 1901 a separate British colony. The states – New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania - each have their own governments, which in most respects are very similar to those of the federal government. Each state has a Governor, with a Premier as head of government. Each state also has a two-chambered Parliament, except Queensland which has had only one chamber since 1921. There are also two self-governing territories: the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. The federal government has no power to override the decisions of state governments except in accordance with the federal Constitution, but it can and does exercise that power over territories. A Constitutional Monarchy Australia is an independent nation, but it shares a monarchy with the United Kingdom and many other countries, including Canada and New Zealand. The Queen is the head of the Commonwealth of Australia, but with her powers delegated to the Governor-General by the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party
    Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party: Postmaterialism and Party change ,- By Peter James Patmore LL.B., Dip. Crim. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements fo r the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, March 2000 II This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously pubJished or written by another person except where due acknowledgment is made in the text ofthe thesis. ................�................. �---=;,.......... Peter Patmore 23" February 2000. III This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years fo llowing the date this statement is signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Peter Pa tmore 23'" February 2000 iv ABSTRACT The Tasmanian Labor Party has found itself, like many western social democratic parties, recently subject to challenge; not from its traditional enemy, the economic right, but froma new postmaterialist left. This thesis considers the concept of postmaterialism, its rise and role in the fo rmation of new ecocentric political parties, and its impact on the structure, ideology and electoral strategy of the Tasmanian Labor Party. Maurice Duverger's typology of political parties has been used to elucidate and consider the characteristics and fo rmation of political parties and the importance of electoral systems - particularly proportional representation - in achieving representational success.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Australia Sydney Registry No S77 of 2016
    • IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA SYDNEY REGISTRY NO S77 OF 2016 BETWEEN: ROBERT JOHN DAY Plaintiff AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL OFFICER FOR AND: THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA First Defendant COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Second Defendant SUBMISSIONS OF THE SECOND DEFENDANT Filed on behalf of the Second Defendant by: Date of this document: 12 April 2016 Contact: Simon Daley I Tony Burslem The Australian Government Solicitor 4 National Circuit, Barton, ACT 2600 File ref: 16001387 DX 5678 Canberra Telephone: 02 9581 7490 1 02 6253 7054 Lawyer's E-mail: [email protected] 1 [email protected] Facsimile: 02 9581 7732 1 02 6253 7384 18915894 PART I FORM OF SUBMISSIONS 1. These submissions are in a form suitable for publication on the internet. PART 11 ISSUES 2. These are stated at the commencement of part VI of these submissions. PART Ill SECTION 788 OF THE JUDICIARY ACT 1903 (CTH) 3. Notice pursuant to s 788 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) was given by the plaintiff on 31 March 2016. No further notice is necessary. PART IV FACTS 10 4. The facts are to be set out in the Application Book to be filed on 19 April 2016 (subject to possible issues of relevance). PART V LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS 5. See attachment. PART VI ARGUMENT 6. The issues that arise and the argument the Commonwealth seeks to advance in respect of each are as follows: 20 7. The overall effect of the amendments: The key provisions in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) ('Electoral Act') as amended by the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act 2016 (Cth) ('Amending Act') ('Amended Act') are ss 272(2), 269(1)(b), 239(2) and 210(1)(f)(ii).
    [Show full text]