DOCSLIB.ORG

The Global Maritime Security and the Japan‐U.S. Alliance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Global Maritime Security and the Japan‐U.S. Alliance The Global Maritime Security and the Japan‐U.S. Alliance Report of the Study Project Challenges and Prospects of Japan‐U.S. Cooperation in Non‐Traditional Security: Focusing on Anti‐Piracy Cooperation May 2010 Supported by The Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership (CGP) Published by The Japan Forum on International Relations (JFIR) Table of Contents Preface..………….……………………………………………………………………………………1 Executive Summary.…………………………………………………………………………………3 Part I: Promoting Japan‐U.S. Cooperation Chapter 1 The Establishment of U.S.‐Japan Comprehensive Approaches to Counter‐Piracy……………...7 Chapter 2 Safety and Security in the Malacca Straits: The Limits of Collaboration…………………………18 Part II: Lessons and Challenges of Counter Piracy Chapter 3 The Challenge of the Jolly Roger: Industry Perspectives on Piracy………………………………39 Chapter 4 Dangerous Sea Areas Where Many Cases of Piracy Take Place…………………………………...54 Chapter 5 Japan’s Role in Strengthening Maritime Security in Southeast Asia………………………………63 Part III: Counter Piracy and the Japan‐U. S. Alliance Chapter 6 Japan’s Counter‐Piracy Policy and The U.S.‐Japan Partnership……………………………………77 Chapter 7 United States Strategic Interests and Cooperative Activities in Maritime Southeast Asia………85 Chapter 8 Fusing U.S’s New Maritime Strategy & Japan’s Maritime Defense Strategy…………………….103 Appendix Contributors………..………….……………………………………………………………………………………120 Secretariat………..………….………………………………………………………………………………………122 Introduction to JFIR……………………………………………………………………………………………...123 Preface In the wake of the Cold War period, globalization and the information revolution have widened the areas of security, where diverse range of issues, including terrorism, pandemics, climate change and environmental destruction, have emerged as new threats, known as non‐traditional security issues. Especially, piracy has now become a global problem that requires global effort to counter. In light of the events of September 11 and the subsequent global war on terror, piracy can no longer be considered just a criminal matter. It is now a part of the national security threat. With our economy deeply integrated within the international community, it is imperative that peace on oceans is secured to guarantee uninterrupted trading. Under the banner of the Japan‐US partnership, both countries should deploy multiple approaches involving different instruments of power to control this threat of piracy. Both Japanese and US governments should, through their active presence, enhance the safety of commercial maritime routes and international navigation along the Malacca Straits and also off the Horn of Africa and enhance the global maritime security. With this awareness in mind, the Japan‐U.S. joint research project entitled “Challenges and Prospects of Japan‐U.S. Cooperation in Non‐Traditional Security: Focusing on Anti‐Piracy Cooperation” was launched in April 2009 by the Japan Forum on International Relations (JFIR) with the support of the Center for Global Partnership (CGP) of the Japan Foundation, which was completed on 30 August, 2010. The Japanese and the U.S. research teams of this project were comprised of the following: The Japanese Research Team Leader: ITO Go Members: KANEDA Hideaki KOTANI Tetsuo YAMADA Yoshihiko Secretariat: YANO Takuya The U.S. Research Team Leader: Sheldon W. SIMON Members: John BRADFORD James MANICOM Neil QUARTARO Secretariat: Tim COOK The Japanese research team was set up to conduct this project on April 8, 2009, and held the first meeting on June 8, 2009. The It held the second meeting On August 4, 2009, with participation of Ms. Raelyn CAMPBELL, then Senior Project Director, The National Bureau of Asian Research(NBR), who was in charge of this project on the U.S. side 1 (Later, Tim COOK, Project Director, Political and Security Affairs, NBR, succeeded Ms. CAMBELL as officer in charge of this project. ) . Then Prof. ITO Go who heads the Japanese team visited Washington D.C. from 23 to 28 of August, and had a meeting with U.S. Study Team at the office of NBR. On the other hand, the members of the U.S. research teams had many occasions to meet and exchange views among themselves in the U.S. on the Japan‐U.S. Alliance and its role in counter‐piracy as international public‐goods. As the culmination of this project, “International Workshop” was held on May 13, 2010, which was followed by “Open Symposium” “Japan‐U.S. Dialogue: Promoting Japan‐U.S. Cooperation in Non‐Traditional Security: the Case of Counter Piracy” on May 14, 2010, in Tokyo, where members of the Japanese and U.S. research teams jointly presented their views on how the Japan‐U.S. alliance could contribute jointly to addressing piracy, as well as to enhance international maritime security cooperation. It was organized as a panel discussion with 10 members from each of the Japan and U.S. Study Teams, including Professor of Meiji University ITO GO and Professor of Arizona State University Sheldon W. SIMON, and also joined by 81 participants from the public at large. The further details are available on the website of the GFJ. (http://www.gfj.jp/jpn/dialogue/36/main.pdf) It is my pleasure to hereby present this Report of the Japan‐U.S. joint research project entitled “Challenges and Prospects of Japan‐U.S. Cooperation in Non‐Traditional Security: Focusing on Anti‐Piracy Cooperation.” Upon publication, I would like to thank Prof. ITO Go, Leader of the Japanese Team, and Prof. Sheldon W. SIMON, Leader of the American Team, for their initiatives and contributions to this research project. I would like to thank CGP for supporting this project. It goes without saying that without their support, this project could not have been possible. August 30, 2010 ITO Kenichi President, JFIR 2 Executive Summary This project was launched right after the June, 2009 passage as well as the July, 2009 enactment of the “Law Concerning Punishments and Counter‐Measures against Acts of Piracy (hereafter the Counter‐Piracy Law).” While the fundamental agenda in any counter‐piracy measures has been how coastal states can make their efforts to lessen the number of piracies, this project, funded by Japan Foundation’s Center for Global Partnership, aimed to couple possible contributions made by both the Japanese and the U.S. governments with the established counter‐measures of the coastal states. It had the following three purposes First, it sought to look for the ways in which not only coastal states but rather ship owners and crews can assure the innocent passage of ships. Second, for this purpose, this project looked for the possibilities of joint contributions by the Japanese and the U.S. governments. Finally, regarding the geographical areas, this project thought of widening the Japan‐U.S. joint counter‐piracy contributions in the high sea as well. That is, given the widening of piracies in the high sea beyond the eastern areas of Somalia’s Gulf of Aden, this project thought of the possibilities of Japan’s making more global contributions. In this year‐long project, the Japanese team consisted of four distinguished fellows, all of whom have conducted a variety of researches on security cooperation between Japan and the United States, and their application to anti‐piracy issues. In conducting the project, we identified three stages. The first was to secure the safety of maritime transportation, including those of civilian ships. These topics come approximately under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) of Japan and the Japan Coast Guard. Prof. Yoshihiko YAMADA focused on this issue, referring to his past experiences as the director at the Nippon Foundation in charge of maritime security. The second was to extend the geographical scope of the activities of the first agenda to the global outreach, and to coordinate concomitant diplomatic relations with other countries concerned. This comes approximately under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) of Japan, and Dr. Tetsuo KOTANI worked on these 3 activities, and conducted a survey on the prospects of policy shift in Japan’s maritime security, after the recent change of Japan’s administration. The third was to take actions against heavily‐armed adversaries in practicing the maritime security activities. This comes approximately under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense (MOD) of Japan. Retired Admiral Hideaki KANEDA focused on this section, namely, Japan’s maritime security with a view to the role of the military as well as the Japan‐U.S. alliance. In his paper, he paid due attention to the U.S.‐Japan “Global Maritime Partnership.” The final role as the research team leader was to direct and coordinate researches of each of the Japanese Research Team members, in accordance with the overall research scheme of this project agreed upon with the American research team. I, Go Ito, worked on the redefinition of Japan’s alliance with the United States in the sense that the alliance has had dual phases: one for the security of Japan and the Far East, and the other for the enlargement of U.S.‐Japan cooperation on non‐traditional security issues like counter‐piracy. Thus, I sought to contain the possibility of Japan’s greater roles in the global society under the banner of the U.S.‐Japan partnership. Statistically speaking, the percentage of a ship inflicted by piracy has been 0.005%, that is, one out of 20,000 trips. That is, for ship owners and crews, the most convenient method, when they are caught by pirates, has been to pay ransom to them, and to have their ships returned. However, the lack of having incentives on the part of ship owners and crews toward the countermeasures will invite the relentless increase in piracy, which implies that piracy can be a “low‐risk, high‐return business.” Therefore, this project looked for several methods of how the coastal states and ship owners can cooperate together for the entire reduction in piracy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17. Shipping Contributors: Alan Simcock (Lead Member)
    Chapter 17. Shipping Contributors: Alan Simcock (Lead member) and Osman Keh Kamara (Co-Lead member) 1. Introduction For at least the past 4,000 years, shipping has been fundamental to the development of civilization. On the sea or by inland waterways, it has provided the dominant way of moving large quantities of goods, and it continues to do so over long distances. From at least as early as 2000 BCE, the spice routes through the Indian Ocean and its adjacent seas provided not merely for the first long-distance trading, but also for the transport of ideas and beliefs. From 1000 BCE to the 13th century CE, the Polynesian voyages across the Pacific completed human settlement of the globe. From the 15th century, the development of trade routes across and between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans transformed the world. The introduction of the steamship in the early 19th century produced an increase of several orders of magnitude in the amount of world trade, and started the process of globalization. The demands of the shipping trade generated modern business methods from insurance to international finance, led to advances in mechanical and civil engineering, and created new sciences to meet the needs of navigation. The last half-century has seen developments as significant as anything before in the history of shipping. Between 1970 and 2012, seaborne carriage of oil and gas nearly doubled (98 per cent), that of general cargo quadrupled (411 per cent), and that of grain and minerals nearly quintupled (495 per cent) (UNCTAD, 2013). Conventionally, around 90 per cent of international trade by volume is said to be carried by sea (IMO, 2012), but one study suggests that the true figure in 2006 was more likely around 75 per cent in terms of tons carried and 59 per cent by value (Mandryk, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Design Decision Support for a Carbon Dioxide Constrained Future
    Ship Design Decision Support for a Carbon Dioxide Constrained Future John Nicholas Calleya A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of University College London. Department of Mechanical Engineering University College London 2014 2 I, John Calleya confirm that that the work submitted in this Thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources I confirm that this has been indicated in the Thesis. Abstract The future may herald higher energy prices and greater regulation of shipping’s greenhouse gas emissions. Especially with the introduction of the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI), tools are needed to assist engineers in selecting the best solutions to meet evolving requirements for reducing fuel consumption and associated carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. To that end, a concept design tool, the Ship Impact Model (SIM), for quickly calculating the technical performance of a ship with different CO2 reducing technologies at an early design stage has been developed. The basis for this model is the calculation of changes from a known baseline ship and the consideration of profitability as the main incentive for ship owners or operators to invest in technologies that reduce CO2 emissions. The model and its interface with different technologies (including different energy sources) is flexible to different technology options; having been developed alongside technology reviews and design studies carried out by the partners in two different projects, “Low Carbon Shipping - A Systems Approach” majority funded by the RCUK energy programme and “Energy Technology Institute Heavy Duty Vehicle Efficiency - Marine” led by Rolls-Royce.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of KONES 2013 NO 2 VOL 20
    Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, Vol. 20, No. 2013 DIMENSIONAL CONSTRAINTS IN SHIP DESIGN Adam Charchalis Gdynia Maritime University Faculty of Marine Engineering Morska Street 83, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The paper presents general rules for calculations of ship’s hull principle dimensions at preliminary stage of design process. There are characterized and defined basic assumptions of design process and limitations for calculations of dimensions and some criteria numbers. Limitations are an outcome of shipping routes what is related to shipping restrictions, diminishing of hull drag, achieving of required strength of hull and safety of shipping requirements. Shipping limitations are because of canals and straits dimensions or harbours drafts. In order to diminish propulsion power, what is related to economically justified solution, selected form and dimensions of hull must ensure minimizing of resistance, including skin friction and wavemaking resistance. That is why proper selection of coefficients of hull shape and dimensional criteria according to ship owner’s requirements i.e. deadweight (DWT) or cargo capacity (TEU), speed and seakeeping. In the paper are analyzed dimensional constraints due to shipping region, diminishing of wavemaking and skin friction resistance or application of Froude Number, ships dimensional coefficients (block coefficient, L/B, B/T, L/H) and coefficients expressing relations between capacity and displacement. The scope of applicability above presented values for different modern vessels construction were analyzed. Keywords: ship principal dimensions, hull volumetric coefficients, hull design 1. Methodology of ship’s principal dimensions selection at early design stage Process of ship design consist of several subsequent stages.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC ROLE of INDIAN NAVY in IOR at PRESENT Hemant
    Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, Online ISSN 2348-3083, SJ IMPACT FACTOR 2019: 6.251, www.srjis.com PEER REVIEWED & REFEREED JOURNAL, JUNE-JULY, 2021, VOL-9/46 STRATEGIC ROLE OF INDIAN NAVY IN IOR AT PRESENT Hemant Kumar Pandey1, Ph. D. & Akhilesh Dwivedi2 Paper Received On: 25 JULY 2021 Peer Reviewed On: 31 JULY 2021 Published On: 1 AUGUST 2021 Content Originality & Unique: 70% Scholarly Research Journal's is licensed Based on a work at www.srjis.com Introduction- The Indian Ocean Region (IOR) turned out to be the most engaging region for global activities in recent years. The Indian Ocean consists of the most important trade routes of the world. The Indian Ocean provides a way to move through various regions of the world. World's huge economic players always keep an eye on the IOR for its strategic importance. The Indian Ocean is a gateway to the Atlantic Ocean through the Mediterranean Sea via the Red Sea and it also provides a way to the Pacific Ocean through the Strait of Malacca. It is the main shipping channel for the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. The Indian Ocean region is spread over 28 states, three continents and covers 17.5% of the global land area. The IOR is home to almost 36% of the population of the world. The region is proven to have a rich petroleum resources and other metals. Indian Ocean is also a rich source of fish and its export. Major Sea routes of the world pass through the Indian Ocean that connects the Middle East, Africa, and East Asia with Europe and the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Developments
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 Report by the UNCTAD secretariat Chapter 4 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2012 PORT DEVELOPMENTS :RUOGFRQWDLQHUSRUWWKURXJKSXWLQFUHDVHGE\DQHVWLPDWHG}SHUFHQWWR}PLOOLRQ IRRWHTXLYDOHQWXQLWV 7(8V LQLWVKLJKHVWOHYHOHYHU7KLVLQFUHDVHZDVORZHU WKDQWKH}SHUFHQWLQFUHDVHRIWKDWZDVLWVHOIDVKDUSUHERXQGIURPWKHVOXPS of 2009. Chinese mainland ports maintained their share of total world container port WKURXJKSXWDW}SHUFHQW 7KH81&7$'/LQHU6KLSSLQJ&RQQHFWLYLW\,QGH[ /6&, VKRZHGDFRQWLQXDWLRQLQ of the trend towards larger ships deployed by a smaller number of companies. Between 2011 and 2012, the number of companies providing services per country went down E\ } SHU FHQW ZKLOH WKH DYHUDJH VL]H RI WKH ODUJHVW FRQWDLQHU VKLSV LQFUHDVHG E\ }SHUFHQW2QO\}SHUFHQWRIFRXQWU\SDLUVDUHVHUYHGE\GLUHFWOLQHUVKLSSLQJ connections; for the remaining country pairs at least one trans-shipment port is required. This chapter covers container port throughput, liner shipping connectivity and some of WKHPDMRUSRUWGHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWVXQGHUZD\LQGHYHORSLQJFRXQWULHV,WDOVRDVVHVVHV how recent trends in ship enlargement may impact ports. 80 REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 A. PORT THROUGHPUT HFRQRPLHV IRU LV HVWLPDWHG DW } SHU FHQW signifying a return to previous year-on-year growth Port throughput is usually measured in tons and by levels. Developing economies’ share of world FDUJR W\SH IRU H[DPSOH OLTXLG RU GU\ FDUJR /LTXLG throughput continues to remain virtually unchanged at cargo is usually measured in tons
    [Show full text]
  • Tendency Toward Mega Containerships and the Constraints of Container Terminals
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Tendency toward Mega Containerships and the Constraints of Container Terminals Nam Kyu Park 1,* and Sang Cheol Suh 2 1 Department of International Logistics, Tongmyong University, Busan 48520, Korea 2 Institute of Port & Logistics Industry, Busan 48520, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-010-3575-1004 Received: 25 February 2019; Accepted: 17 April 2019; Published: 6 May 2019 Abstract: This paper focuses on the coping ability of the existing container terminals when mega containerships call at a port. The length of 30,000 TEU (Twenty Equivalent Unit) ships are predicted to be 453 m and occupy 498 m of a quay wall. As a result, the length of berth should be more than a minimum of 500 m. If a 25,000 TEU ship or 30,000 TEU ship call at a terminal, the outreach of QC (Quay Crane) should be a minimum 74.3 m or 81.0 m respectively. As mega ships are calling at the port, the ship waiting time, the available stacking area, and the number of handling equipment can be limited. The analysis reveals that larger ships wait for longer than the smaller ones because they have difficulty allocating the proper seat on berth. As a result of the survey in a terminal, the average occupancy is shown to be 60.4%, the minimum is 52.4%, and the maximum is 73.3%. Surveying the monthly equipment operation rate for 3 years, the average is 85.8%, the minimum is 80.1%, and the maximum is 90.1%.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm I C R O S O F T W O R
    Copernic Agent Search Results Search: Gulf of Aden war ship battle portal (All the words) Found: 1019 result(s) on _Full.Search Date: 7/23/2010 11:06:20 AM 1. Indian Frigate Sinks Pirate Ship in Gulf of Aden ... NEW DELHI, Nov. 19 -- An Indian navy frigate battled with and sank a vessel described as a pirate mother ship in the Gulf of Aden, one of the world's busiest and most ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/19/AR2008111900364.html 94% 2. Pirate Attack in the Gulf of Aden Michael Briant completed a circumnaviagion in Bambola reports on Pirates, Red Sea Anchorages lightning strikes, French Canal routes and all the fun of blue water ... http://www.michaelbriant.com/attacked.htm 93% 3. What is Happening in the Gulf of Aden? « Revolutionizing Awareness It has a Swirl Pattern just Like A Portal In ... those who have been in charge of making war ... French Ship Guepratte Provides a Presence in Gulf of Aden http://revolutionizingawareness.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/what-is-happening-in-the-gulf-of-aden/ 93% 4. Piracy in Somalia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... 11 May 2010, Somali pirates seized a Bulgarian-flagged ship in the Gulf of Aden. ... increased war insurance premium due to the high risk off the Gulf of Aden."[80] ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy_in_Somalia 92% 5. Shippers urge naval blockade of Somali coast World news channel covers Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Europe, America and Africa. Chinadaily.com.cn is the largest English portal in China, providing news, business ..
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Corps Senior Leadership
    JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2017 Supply Corps Senior Leadership Happy New Year! As we begin 2017, I am optimistic that we will build on the many successes of 2016, and that we are well-positioned as a community to meet the challenges and leverage the opportunities ahead of us. One of the ways in which we are so well-posi- tioned is the strength of our team, and it is my pleasure to introduce our new Command Master Chief, Thaddeus T. Wright, who joined NAVSUP on November 2, 2016. Master A Message from the Chief Wright brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the command and the Chief of Supply Corps enlisted community, as well as a fresh, new perspective to the NAVSUP team. This edition of the Supply Corps Newsletter features articles from the Supply Corps Senior Leadership Symposium held in Leesburg, Virginia, in November 2016. Flag Officers, Senior Executive Service members, Captains, and Captain-selects met to review the current state of our community, explore key initiatives, and prepare for 2017 and beyond. Topics such as our alignment with the Navy’s Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority, how we plan and execute in support of the full range of military operations, the role of mentor- ship in our community, and the increasing scope of our expeditionary support, highlight not only how our supply community is evolving, but also how our mission of providing world class supplies, services, and quality of life support to the warfighter is ever-enduring. Whether you are or may one day be part of our Reserve Component or FTS Supply Corps team, I encourage you to attend the upcoming National RC Supply Corps Sympo- sium in Dallas, Texas, May 20 and 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Management of Refits of Indian Naval Ships
    Planning and Management of Refits of Indian Naval Ships Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India for the year ended March 2013 Union Government Defence Services (Navy) Report No. 31 of 2013 (Performance Audit) PerformanceAuditofPlanningandManagementofRefitsofIndianNavalShips CONTENTS Sl. No./ Subject Page Para No. 1. Preface i 2. Executive Summary ii 3. Chapter 1 : Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Refit and its types 1 1.3 Organisational Structure 3 1.4 Repair Yards 4 1.5 Financial Aspects 5 1.6 Reasons for selecting the topic 5 1.7 Audit Objectives 6 1.8 Scope of Audit 6 1.9 Sources of Audit Criteria 7 1.10 Acknowledgement 7 1.11 Audit Methodology 8 4. Chapter 2 : Planning and Execution 9 of Refits 2.1 How are the refits planned? 9 2.2 Execution of Refits 11 2.3 Excess utilisation of dry docking days 18 2.4 Off-loading of refits 18 5. Chapter 3 : Mid Life Update of Ships 23 3.1 Mid Life Updates: The Rationale, Need and the 23 Candidate Ships 3.2 Planning and Implementation of MLUs 24 3.3 Financial Management 29 3.4 Efficacy of MLU 31 3.5 Procurement of MLU equipment 34 PerformanceAuditofPlanningandManagementofRefitsofIndianNavalShips 6. Chapter 4: Infrastructure, Human 41 Resources and Supply of Spares 4.1 Background 41 4.2 Infrastructure Facilities 41 4.3 Earlier Audit Findings 43 4.4 Creation of Additional infrastructure 43 4.5 Human Resources 48 4.6 Supply of Spares 54 4.7 Local purchase of Stores 59 7. Chapter 5 : Cost Accounting of Refits and 62 MLUs 5.1 Introduction 62 5.2 Cost Accounting System in Dockyard 63 5.3 Delay in preparation of AWPA 64 5.4 Difficulties in ascertaining cost of a refit 65 5.5 Delay in closing of work orders 65 5.6 Non-preparation of cost accounts 66 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mega-Ships
    The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 54 member countries. It acts as a strategic think tank with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an Annual Summit of ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States. The International Transport Forum’s Research Centre gathers statistics and conducts co-operative research programmes addressing all modes of transport. Its findings are widely disseminated and support policy making in Member countries as well as contributing to the Annual Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Logistics Support for Ballistic Missile Defense Ships in Sixth Fleet
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2013-12 Optimizing logistics support for Ballistic Missile Defense ships in sixth fleet Alarcon, Julio A. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/38881 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA MBA PROFESSIONAL REPORT OPTIMIZING LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SHIPS IN SIXTH FLEET By: Julio A. Alarcon and Timothy J. Boston December 2013 Advisors: Aruna Apte Walter DeGrange Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2013 MBA Professional Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS OPTIMIZING LOGISTICS SUPPORT FOR BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SHIPS IN SIXTH FLEET 6. AUTHOR(S) Julio A. Alarcon and Timothy J. Boston 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10.
    [Show full text]